- •Contents
- •List of illustrations
- •List of tables
- •List of boxes
- •Foreword
- •Preface
- •Acknowledgements
- •1 Introduction
- •2 Key words in brand management
- •4 The economic approach
- •5 The identity approach
- •7 The personality approach
- •8 The relational approach
- •9 The community approach
- •10 The cultural approach
- •11 Taxonomy of brand management 1985–2006
- •Notes
- •Name Index
- •Subject Index
List of tables
5.1 |
Product and corporate branding |
51 |
5.2The internal and external supporting themes adding up to
|
brand identity |
59 |
5.3 |
Three perspectives on organizational culture |
66 |
5.4 |
Detecting identity gaps |
73 |
5.5 |
Aligning identity gaps |
74 |
6.1 |
A simple version of a matrix array |
100 |
7.1Creating brand personality in accordance with the consumer
|
self construct |
140 |
8.1 |
Relationship forms |
161 |
8.2Differences between the information-processing and the
|
experiential consumer perspective |
174 |
9.1 |
Variations of brand community |
190 |
10.1A comparison between the mindshare branding model and the
|
cultural branding model |
220 |
10.2 |
The postmodern and the post-postmodern branding paradigm |
223 |
11.1 |
The roles of brands |
251 |
11.2 |
Four brand management paradigms |
254 |
11.3 |
A comparison of axioms across four branding models |
255 |
11.4 |
Comparison of brand management categorizations |
256 |
List of boxes
3.1 |
Overview of brand management 1985–2006 |
26 |
4.1Economic man: individual and societal maximization in a
supermarket checkout queue |
32 |
4.2Transactional versus relational perspective on brand
|
management |
36 |
4.3 |
Regression analysis |
41 |
5.1 |
The identity concept adopted from marketing |
49 |
5.2 |
From product to corporate branding at Lego |
52 |
5.3 |
Is identity enduring? |
54 |
5.4 |
Culture in the identity approach |
58 |
5.5 |
Misaligned identities: the case of Body Shop |
63 |
5.6 |
Doing a study of brand identity yourself |
69 |
5.7 |
Living the brand: all about the people of Quiksilver |
75 |
5.8 |
Do’s and don’ts of the identity approach |
76 |
6.1 |
Memory representations |
90 |
6.2 |
Heuristics are important in low-involvement categories |
92 |
6.3 |
How to structure brand associations |
96 |
6.4 |
Projective techniques |
101 |
6.5 |
Map out customers’ brand associations yourself |
102 |
6.6 |
Things to consider when choosing the right brand name |
105 |
6.7 |
Six managerial guidelines |
107 |
6.8 |
Do’s and don’ts of the consumer-based approach |
109 |
7.1 |
Oil of Olay: female consumers’ hopes and dreams |
126 |
7.2 |
Archetypes and brand personality |
131 |
7.3 |
Ordinal scales applied |
135 |
7.4 |
Interval scales applied |
135 |
7.5‘Six steps’ method of exploring and measuring brand
|
personality |
137 |
7.6 |
Brand personalities in practice |
141 |
7.7 |
When good brands do bad |
145 |
7.8 |
Do’s and don’ts of the personality approach |
146 |
8.1Customer relationship management and brand relationship
theory |
152 |
xii |
List of boxes |
|
8.2 |
Background of the brand relationship theory |
159 |
8.3 |
The complexity of a relationship |
164 |
8.4 |
Depth is preferred to breadth |
167 |
8.5 |
Stories can be helped along |
167 |
8.6 |
Conduct a long interview yourself |
169 |
9.1 |
Who owns the Apple brand now? |
184 |
9.2 |
Getting too close? |
193 |
9.3 |
Solving the insider/outsider dilemma |
193 |
9.4 |
Quantitative triangulation of qualitative data |
194 |
9.5How to do an ethnographic study of a brand community
|
yourself |
195 |
9.6 |
Insights from the Volkswagen ‘Beetle’ community |
198 |
9.7 |
Do’s and don’ts in the community approach |
200 |
9.8Libresse: the community principles applied to fast-moving
|
consumer goods |
202 |
10.1 |
Macro-level culture defined |
209 |
10.2 |
How Snapple became an iconic brand |
218 |
10.3 |
Civic responsibilities or cultural branding? |
221 |
10.4 |
Doing semiotics |
225 |
10.5 |
Doing a cultural study yourself |
227 |
10.6 |
The versatile brand manager of the cultural approach |
230 |
10.7 |
Just another legal case or an early warning sign? |
232 |
10.8 |
A citizen-artist brand? |
232 |
10.9 |
Do’s and don’ts in the cultural approach |
234 |
Foreword
Leslie de Chernatony
Given the research I have undertaken over the years helping managers understand the nature of their brand and the opportunities for strategically growing brands, I am delighted to write the foreword for this insightful and most timely book. The authors have done an extremely thorough job, diligently working through the brand research literature to devise seven perspectives from diverse schools of thought about perceptions of brands. From this typology, among other things, they consider how the all-important brand equity is created and managed. The authors are to be congratulated on grounding this text so expertly in the literature yet still enabling management implications to be wisely crystallized.
Seeking to elucidate the nature of a brand is a daunting task, since brands are like amoeba, constantly changing. At the most basic, brands start life in brand planning documents, evolving as pan-company teams revise their ideas. Ultimately, after being finessed by stakeholders in the value chain, brands reside in the minds and hearts of consumers – hopefully in a form not too dissimilar from that desired by the firm. The research neatly synthesized in this text coherently brings more understanding to the challenge of understanding a corporation’s brand and managing its growth trajectory. It is clear from the authors’ work why diverse interpretations exist about the nature of brands.
From this well argued text it can be appreciated that one of the challenges managers face is finding a suitable metaphor to ensure common understanding of the firm’s brand. Without this, supporting brand resources may not be coherently integrated. Furthermore, under the service dominant logic paradigm, it is more widely recognized that brands are co-created through stakeholder interactions. Managers not only have to understand each other’s understanding and inputs to brand building, but also to recognize the way brand communities want to shape the brand.Again, the authors helpfully elucidate the importance of brand communities.
There is much in this book that makes it an inspirational read.
Leslie de Chernatony Professor of Brand Marketing Birmingham University Business School