principles_of_economics_gregory_mankiw
.pdf274 |
PART FIVE FIRM BEHAVIOR AND THE ORGANIZATION OF INDUSTRY |
cookies (“rise”) for each additional input of labor (“run”). That is, the slope of the production function measures the marginal product of a worker. As the number of workers increases, the marginal product declines, and the production function becomes flatter.
|
OUTPUT (QUANTITY OF |
MARGINAL |
|
|
TOTAL COST OF INPUTS |
|
NUMBER OF |
COOKIES PRODUCED |
PRODUCT |
COST OF |
COST OF |
(COST OF FACTORY + COST |
|
WORKERS |
PER HOUR) |
OF LABOR |
FACTORY |
WORKERS |
OF WORKERS) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
0 |
50 |
$30 |
$ 0 |
$30 |
|
1 |
50 |
30 |
10 |
40 |
||
40 |
||||||
2 |
90 |
30 |
20 |
50 |
||
30 |
||||||
3 |
120 |
30 |
30 |
60 |
||
20 |
||||||
4 |
140 |
30 |
40 |
70 |
||
10 |
||||||
5 |
150 |
30 |
50 |
80 |
||
|
Table 13-1 |
A PRODUCTION FUNCTION AND TOTAL COST: HUNGRY HELEN’S COOKIE FACTORY |
|
Quantity of Output (cookies per hour)
150 |
|
Production function |
140 |
|
|
130 |
|
|
120 |
|
|
110 |
|
|
100 |
|
|
90 |
|
|
80 |
|
|
70 |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 Number of Workers Hired |
280 |
PART FIVE FIRM BEHAVIOR AND THE ORGANIZATION OF INDUSTRY |
|
|
|
wait to use the equipment. Therefore, when the quantity of lemonade being pro- |
|
|
duced is already high, the marginal product of an extra worker is low, and the mar- |
|
|
ginal cost of an extra glass of lemonade is large. |
|
|
U - Shaped Average Total Cost Thirsty Thelma’s average-total-cost |
|
|
curve is U-shaped. To understand why this is so, remember that average total cost |
|
|
is the sum of average fixed cost and average variable cost. Average fixed cost al- |
|
|
ways declines as output rises because the fixed cost is getting spread over a larger |
|
|
number of units. Average variable cost typically rises as output increases because |
|
|
of diminishing marginal product. Average total cost reflects the shapes of both av- |
|
|
erage fixed cost and average variable cost. At very low levels of output, such as 1 |
|
|
or 2 glasses per hour, average total cost is high because the fixed cost is spread |
|
|
over only a few units. Average total cost then declines as output increases until the |
|
|
firm’s output reaches 5 glasses of lemonade per hour, when average total cost falls |
|
|
to $1.30 per glass. When the firm produces more than 6 glasses, average total cost |
|
|
starts rising again because average variable cost rises substantially. |
|
|
The bottom of the U-shape occurs at the quantity that minimizes average total |
ef ficient scale |
cost. This quantity is sometimes called the efficient scale of the firm. For Thirsty |
|
the quantity of output that |
Thelma, the efficient scale is 5 or 6 glasses of lemonade. If she produces more or |
|
minimizes average total cost |
less than this amount, her average total cost rises above the minimum of $1.30. |
The Relationship between Mar ginal Cost and Average Total Cost If you look at Figure 13-5 (or back at Table 13-2), you will see something that may be surprising at first. Whenever marginal cost is less than average total cost, average total cost is falling. Whenever marginal cost is greater than average total cost, average total cost is rising. This feature of Thirsty Thelma’s cost curves is not a coincidence from the particular numbers used in the example: It is true for all firms.
To see why, consider an analogy. Average total cost is like your cumulative grade point average. Marginal cost is like the grade in the next course you will take. If your grade in your next course is less than your grade point average, your grade point average will fall. If your grade in your next course is higher than your grade point average, your grade point average will rise. The mathematics of average and marginal costs is exactly the same as the mathematics of average and marginal grades.
This relationship between average total cost and marginal cost has an important corollary: The marginal-cost curve crosses the average-total-cost curve at the efficient scale. Why? At low levels of output, marginal cost is below average total cost, so average total cost is falling. But after the two curves cross, marginal cost rises above average total cost. For the reason we have just discussed, average total cost must start to rise at this level of output. Hence, this point of intersection is the minimum of average total cost. As you will see in the next chapter, this point of minimum average total cost plays a key role in the analysis of competitive firms.
TYPICAL COST CURVES
In the examples we have studied so far, the firms exhibit diminishing marginal product and, therefore, rising marginal cost at all levels of output. Yet actual firms are often a bit more complicated than this. In many firms, diminishing marginal product does not start to occur immediately after the first worker is hired. Depending on the