- •Tapescript Section Unit 1, Part 1
- •Unit 1, Part 2
- •Unit 1, Part 3
- •Unit 1, Part 4
- •Unit 2, Part 1
- •Unit 3, Part 1
- •Unit 3, Part 2
- •Unit 3. Part 3
- •Unit 3, Part 4
- •Unit 3, Part 4
- •Unit 4, Part 1
- •Unit 4, Part 2
- •Unit 4, Part 3
- •Unit 4, Part 4
- •Stereotyping
- •Omission or invisibility
- •Derogatory labelling
- •Imposed labelling
- •Unit 5, Part 2
- •Unit 5, Part 3
- •Unit 5, Part 4
- •Unit 6, Part 1
- •Unit 6, Part 2
- •Unit 6, Part 3
- •Unit 6, Part 4
Imposed labelling
Imposed labelling is when a minority or less powerful group has a name or term given to them by the majority group. Usually when these minority groups assert their own powers and rights they replace their imposed label with a term of their own choice. It is important to be aware of the significance of terms, forms of address and labels chosen by minority groups and to respect and use their chosen preference.
Sexist language is language that expresses a bias in favour of one sex and thus discriminates against the other. In general the bias has been in favour of men and against women. This bias occurs when the language used to describe women makes them seem invisible, is stereotypical or implies that women are somehow inferior to men.
Non-discriminatory or non-sexist language is language which recognises the differences between the sexes but treats both sexes equally and fairly.
A common form of sexist language is the use of the terms man, he, his, etc to refer to all humanity, both male and female. This use of these terms does not give women equal linguistic representation. Ambiguities also arise because
these terms have a dual meaning. They can be used to refer to men only. Here are some suggested alternatives.
Avoid |
Suggested |
man |
humans, human beings, humankind, man and woman, person, men and women, people |
manpower |
workforce, personnel, staff, human resources |
man-made |
artificial, constructed, fabricated, handmade |
man in the street |
average person, ordinary people, people in general |
chairman |
chairperson, convenor, coordinator |
workmanlike |
skilful, efficient |
policeman |
police officer |
groundsman |
gardener, grounds worker, landscaper |
spokesman |
principal advocate, official, representative, speaker, spokesperson |
businessman |
business person, business executive, entrepreneur |
Avoid using occupational titles containing the feminine suffixes -ess, -ette, -trix, -ienne. These often have trivialising or negative connotations and convey the idea that women are deviations from a male norm.
actress authoress waitress sculptress comedienne |
actor author waiter sculptor comedian |
The inappropriate use of names, titles, salutations and endearments creates the impression that women merit less respect or less serious consideration than men do. Be absolutely consistent and use titles for men and women that are parallel.
The titles Miss and Mrs not only identify the person addressed as a woman but reveal her marital status, whereas the use of Mr merely identifies that person as a man. The use of Ms is recommended for all women when the parallel Mr is applicable, and Ms should always be used when a woman's preferred title is unknown. A woman's preferred title should be respected when known.
The use of endearments such as dear, love, sweetie, honey for women in work and formal situations is inappropriate,
condescending and sometimes insulting to women. Their use should be avoided.
Avoid irrelevant sexist references to a woman's physical appearance, marital or parenting status. In the professional context where these factors are not referred to in relation to a man they should not be raised in relation to a woman.
Avoid the use of stereotyped descriptions when referring to men's and women's behaviour. If men and women have
similar behaviours or characteristics the same language should be used to describe both. Commonly used stereotyping terms are -
For men |
For women |
strong |
domineering |
cautious |
timid |
assertive |
aggressive |
firm |
stubborn |
conversation |
gossip |
In recent years, there has been an increasing awareness of the rights and concerns of people with disabilities. With this
increasing awareness has come the recognition that discriminatory language is often used in relation to people with
disabilities. Often these people have been the subject of depersonalising, stereotyped and derogatory language. The
preferred term people with disabilities was developed because it recognises that people with disabilities are people first.
The discriminatory nature of derogatory labels used to describe members of minority groups is often obvious. However, in the case of people with disabilities, labels such as crippled, blind, deaf, dumb and retarded are still commonly used and should be avoided. Some acceptable alternatives for such labels are person with mobility impairment, person with Down's Syndrome, person with hearing and speech disabilities, person with an intellectual disability.
The use of imprecise euphemistic terms such as physically challenged, physically gifted and differently abled should be avoided. Avoid using the terms victim or sufferer to refer to a person who has or has had an illness, disease or disability.
These terms dehumanise the person and emphasise powerlessness.
Avoid |
Suggested |
victim or AIDS sufferer |
people who are HIV positive, a person who has AIDS |
polio victim |
a person who has had polio |
Language used in reference to people of other than heterosexual preference is often derogatory and implies inferiority or deviance. Avoid terms such as poofter, queer, queen, dyke, transvestite and use instead homosexual/gay men or homosexual women/lesbian or transsexual/trans-gender.
Avoid stereotyped descriptions or derogatory terms, eg. gay men are often referred to as effeminate and lesbians are often referred to as butch or masculine.