
Rothwell W.J. - Beyond Training and Development[c] The Groundbreaking Classic on Human Performance Enhancement (2004)(2-e)(en)
.pdf
|
|
|
|
Corresponding HPE Core Competencies |
|
|
|
|
|
Organizational |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Environment |
Work Environment |
Work |
Worker |
Steps in the New |
Role Name for |
(The World Outside |
(The World Inside |
(Transformation |
(People Performing |
|
|
HPE Model |
HPE Specialists |
the Organization) |
the Organization) |
Processes) |
the Work) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. |
Assess the likely |
Forecaster of |
Ability to forecast |
Ability to forecast |
Ability to forecast |
Ability to forecast |
|
outcomes of im- |
Consequences |
the likely conse- |
the likely conse- |
the likely conse- |
the likely conse- |
|
plementation to |
|
quences of human |
quences of human |
quences of human |
quences of human |
|
minimize nega- |
|
performance |
performance |
performance |
performance |
|
tive side effects |
|
enhancement |
enhancement |
enhancement |
enhancement |
|
and maximize |
|
strategies as they |
strategies as they |
strategies as they |
strategies as they |
|
results |
|
may eventually |
may eventually |
may eventually |
may eventually |
|
|
|
affect relations |
affect intergroup |
affect work meth- |
affect individuals |
|
|
|
with customers, |
and intragroup |
ods and processes |
and their per- |
|
|
|
suppliers, dis- |
relations inside |
|
formance |
|
|
|
tributors, and |
the organization |
|
|
|
|
|
other external |
|
|
|
|
|
|
stakeholders |
|
|
|
8. |
Establish an ac- |
Action Plan Fa- |
Ability to prepare |
Ability to prepare |
Ability to prepare |
Ability to prepare |
|
tion plan for the |
cilitator |
and coordinate |
and coordinate |
and coordinate |
and coordinate |
|
implementa- |
|
the preparation of |
the preparation of |
the preparation of |
the preparation of |
|
tion of the per- |
|
action plans for |
action plans for |
action plans for |
action plans for |
|
formance en- |
|
human per- |
human per- |
human perfor- |
human per- |
|
hancement |
|
formance en- |
formance en- |
mance enhance- |
formance en- |
|
strategies |
|
hancement, |
hancement, |
ment, integrating |
hancement, |
|
|
|
integrating them |
integrating them |
them with work |
giving each |
|
|
|
with organiza- |
with organiza- |
processes and |
worker a say in |
|
|
|
tional strategic |
tional culture, |
methods |
decisions and ac- |
|
|
|
plans |
structure, and |
|
tions affecting her |
|
|
|
|
politics |
|
or him |
PECIALISTSS NHANCEMENTE ERFORMANCEP UMANH FOR OMPETENCIESC OREC 294

9. |
Implement the |
Human Per- |
Ability to imple- |
Ability to imple- |
Ability to imple- |
Ability to imple- |
|
performance |
formance En- |
ment, or coordi- |
ment, or coordi- |
ment, or coordi- |
ment, or coordi- |
|
enhancement |
hancement |
nate implemen- |
nate implemen- |
nate implementa- |
nate the |
|
strategies |
Implementer |
tation of, human |
tation of, human |
tion of, human |
implementa- |
|
|
|
performance |
performance |
performance |
tion of, human |
|
|
|
enhancement |
enhancement |
enhancement |
performance |
|
|
|
strategies, inte- |
strategies, inte- |
strategies, integ- |
enhancement |
|
|
|
grating them with |
grating them with |
rating them with |
strategies, giving |
|
|
|
organizational |
organizational |
work processes |
each worker a say |
|
|
|
strategic plans |
culture, structure, |
and work |
in decisions and |
|
|
|
|
and politics |
methods |
actions affecting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
her or him |
10. |
Evaluate results |
Human Per- |
Ability to evalu- |
Ability to evalu- |
Ability to evalu- |
Ability to evalu- |
|
during and after |
formance En- |
ate, or coordinate |
ate, or coordinate |
ate, or coordinate |
ate, or coordinate |
|
implement- |
hancement |
evaluation of, |
evaluation of, |
evaluation of, |
the evaluation of, |
|
ation, feeding |
Evaluator |
human perfor- |
human perfor- |
human perfor- |
human per- |
|
information |
|
mance enhance- |
mance enhance- |
mance enhance- |
formance en- |
|
back into step 1 |
|
ment strategies, |
ment strategies, |
ment strategies, |
hancement |
|
|
|
integrating eval- |
integrating eval- |
integrating eval- |
strategies, giving |
|
|
|
uation processes |
uation processes |
uation processes |
each worker a say |
|
|
|
with organiza- |
with corporate |
with work pro- |
in evaluation |
|
|
|
tional strategy |
culture, structure, |
cesses and work |
processes and in |
|
|
|
evaluation |
and politics |
methods |
feeding results |
|
|
|
|
|
|
back into future |
|
|
|
|
|
|
human per- |
formance enhancement strategies
Specialists Enhancement Performance Human for Competencies Core
295
This page intentionally left blank

A P P E N D I X I I
A S S E S S I N G H U M A N P E R F O R M A N C E
E N H A N C E M E N T C O M P E T E N C I E S :
A D A T A C O L L E C T I O N I N S T R U M E N T
Instructions
Competency assessment identifies the characteristics underlying the successful performance of exemplary workers. It can be past-, present-, or future-oriented.
One way to transform the traditional training and development department into a human performance enhancement (HPE) function is to establish an organization-specific HPE competency model and then build the competencies of the training and development staff—or others—until staff competencies match the HPE competencies.
Use this instrument to identify the HPE competencies critical to future success in your organization and then rate yourself against them. In the left column on the following pages, you will find statements describing HPE competencies. In the center column, rate by circling a number how important you believe that competency is to future success in your job category in your organization. Use the following scale:
297

298 |
ASSESSING HUMAN PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT COMPETENCIES |
1 No importance
2 Little importance
3 Some importance
4 Much importance
5 Very much importance
Then, in the right column, rate by circling a number how competent you believe yourself to be in that competency area at present. Use the following scale:
1 No competence
2 Little competence
3 Some competence
4 Much competence
5 Very much competence
As you complete each role category on the instrument, compile a subtotal for the center and right columns and place the score in the appropriate box on each page. When you finish the entire instrument, copy your scores from each box to the appropriate totals at the end of the instrument. Then return the completed instrument to a designated Survey Administrator for scoring. The results of this study will be used to assess HPE competencies in this organization. Your participation is essential.

Human Performance Enhancement Competency |
|
Future Importance |
|
|
Present Competence |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate the future importance of each competency |
None |
Little |
Some |
Much |
Very |
None |
Little |
Some |
Much |
Very |
|
and your present competency level of each of the |
|
|
|
|
Much |
|
|
|
|
Much |
|
following HPE competencies for your job |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
category in the organization |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auditor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Identifies what is happening) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Ability to examine needs and expecta- |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
tions of customers, suppliers, distribu- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tors, and stakeholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
Ability to formulate, assess and convert |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
organizational plans into HPE efforts or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
strategies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. |
Ability to key improvement efforts to orga- |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
nizational mission and strategy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. |
Ability to identify organizational strengths |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
and weaknesses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. |
Ability to examine work flow within and |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
between departments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. |
Ability to detect bottlenecks in work pro- |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
cessing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. |
Ability to assess present worker compe- |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
tency levels |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8. |
Ability to assess workforce supply |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Competency Score by Role |
Future Importance Score |
|
|
Present Competence Score |
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Competencies Enhancement Performance Human Assessing
299

Visionary
(Identifies what should be happening)
9. |
Ability to identify customer needs and ex- |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
pectations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10. |
Ability to detect threats and opportunities |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
in the organizational environment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11. |
Ability to locate world-class benchmarks |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
of organizational performance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12. |
Ability to modify criteria of High-Perform- |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
ance Work (HPW) Organizations to fit one |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
corporate culture |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13. |
Ability to identify employee needs and ex- |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
pectations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14. |
Ability to clarify ways to improve work |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
flow to achieve breakthrough productivity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
increases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15. |
Ability to forecast future worker compe- |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
tency needs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16. |
Ability to assess workforce needs for the |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
organization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Competency Score by Role |
Future Importance Score |
|
|
Present Competence Score |
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300
OMPETENCIESC NHANCEMENTE ERFORMANCEP UMANH SSESSINGA

Human Performance Enhancement Competency |
|
Future Importance |
|
|
Present Competence |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate the future importance of each competency |
None |
Little |
Some |
Much |
Very |
None |
Little |
Some |
Much |
Very |
and your present competency level of each of the |
|
|
|
|
Much |
|
|
|
|
Much |
following HPE competencies for your job |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
category in the organization |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gap Assessor
(Clarifies present and future performance gaps)
17. |
Ability to compare what is and what |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
should be in the organization’s inter- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
actions with the external environment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18. |
Ability to compare what is and what |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
should be in the organization’s internal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
environment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19. |
Ability to compare what is and what |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
should be in work processing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20. |
Ability to compare the difference between |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
what is and what should be at the individ- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ual level |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21. |
Ability to detect mismatch(es) between |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
individual and the job in which she or he |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
is placed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Competency Score by Role |
Future Importance Score |
|
|
Present Competence Score |
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Competencies Enhancement Performance Human Assessing
301

HPE Facilitator
(Determines the present and future importance of performance gaps)
22. |
Ability to determine the importance of |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
gaps between what is and what should be |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in the organization’s interactions with the |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
external environment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23. |
Ability to determine the importance of |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
gaps between what is and what should be |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
within the organization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24. |
Ability to determine the importance of |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
gaps between what is and what should be |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in work processing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25. |
Ability to determine the importance of |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
gaps between what the worker can do and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
what the worker should be able to do |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Competency Score by Role |
Future Importance Score |
|
|
Present Competence Score |
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
302
C NHANCEMENTE ERFORMANCEP UMANH SSESSINGA
OMPETENCIES

Strategic Troubleshooter
(Identifies the underlying causes of performance gaps)
26. |
Ability to isolate strategic mismatches in |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
the organization’s interactions with the |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
external environment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27. |
Ability to benchmark with other organiza- |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
tions in the industry or ‘‘best-in-class’’ or- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ganizations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28. |
Ability to isolate large-scale and small- |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
scale cause(s) of gaps within the organi- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
zation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29. |
Ability to troubleshoot the cause(s) of |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
gaps in the work or work flow |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30. |
Ability to troubleshoot the cause(s) of per- |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
formance gaps between the worker and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
other performance environments (work |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
level, work environment level, and organi- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
zational environment level) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Competency Score by Role |
Future Importance Score |
|
|
Present Competence Score |
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Competencies Enhancement Performance Human Assessing
303