
- •Федеральное агентство по образованию рф
- •1. Организационно-методический раздел.
- •Раздел 1. Стратегии перевода. Членение текста.
- •Тема 1. Предпереводческий анализ текста. Способы перевода.
- •Тема 2. Единицы перевода и членение текста.
- •Тема 3. Перевод заголовков
- •Кроме вспомогательного глагола в данном случае был опущен и артикль. Наряду с артиклями в заголовках также часто опускаются притяжательные местоимения и другие служебные слова.
- •1.Переведите заголовки на русский язык:
- •2. Для каждого из слов слева, обычно используемых в заголовках, найдите синонимичное соответствие в правом столбике, обращаясь к нижеприведенным заголовкам:
- •4. Выберите лучшее объяснение ключевых слов:
- •Тема 5. Конкретизация, генерализация.
- •Тема 6. Перевод атрибутивных сочетаний.
- •Сокращение
- •Расширение
- •Тема 7. Перевод фразеологизмов.
- •1.Подберите английские эквиваленты следующих русских поговорок и пословиц:
- •2.Переведите на русский язык предложения, выделив фразеологизмы в их составе.
- •Раздел 3. Грамматические и стилистические приемы перевода.
- •Тема 8. Морфологические преобразования в условиях различия грамматических форм.
- •Тема 9. Эмфатизация и эмфатические конструкции.
- •Тема 10. Инверсия.
- •Тема 11. Антонимический перевод
- •Тема 12. Синтаксические преобразования на уровне предложений.
- •Тема 13.Перестановка компонентов.
- •Тема 14. Перевод метафорических единиц.
- •Тема 15.Перевод метонимии.
- •Тема 16. Приемы передачи иронии.
- •3. Приложения
- •Taxation
- •Banking
- •Приложение 3. Marketing
- •Management Text a. History of management theories
- •Views on management have changed substantially over the past century – particularly in the past few decades.
- •Scientific Management Theory (1890 - 1940)
- •Text b. Contemporary theories in management
- •Contingency Theory
- •Лексический минимум по теме «Taxation»
- •Некоторые трудности при переводе конструкций с инфинитивом, герундием и причастием
- •Латинские выражения, используемые в текстах на английском языке.
3. Приложения
Приложение 1.
Taxation
The ways in which governments raise money through taxation continue to vary widely across the OECD, with Denmark collecting almost 60% of its revenues from personal and corporate taxes and France less than 25%, according to data in the latest edition of the OECD’s annual Revenue Statistics publication.
In North America, Mexico collects more than half of its tax revenue from taxes on the sales of goods and services while the US raises less than fifth of its revenue form this source. At regional and local level, different patterns are also visible. While most countries use a mix of state and local taxes to finance sub-national government, Ireland and the UK rely exclusively on local property taxes and Sweden exclusively on local income tax. Such differences reflect national choices with regard to taxation which in turn are determined by economic and social priorities.
In 2004, the OECD publication reveals, Sweden once again had the highest tax-to-GDP ratio among OECD countries, at 50.7% against 50.6% in 2003. Denmark came next at 49.6% (48.3%), followed by Belgium at 45.6% (45.4%). At the other end of the scale, Mexico had the lowest tax-to-GDP ratio, at 18.5%, against 19.0% in 2003. Korea had the second lowest, at 24.6% (25.3%), and the US had the third, at 25.4% (25.6%).
The ratio of total tax revenues to gross domestic product at market prices is a widely used measure of the extent of state involvement in national economies. Countries with high tax-to-GDP ratios tend to pay more from public purse for services that citizens would have to pay for themselves – or do without – in lower-tax countries. However, comparisons are not always easy to make: for example, many countries with high tax-to-GDP ratios provide family benefits as cash payments rather than as tax reductions, increasing the apparent tax burden as measured by the tax-to-GDP ratio.
Taking the 30-nation OECD area as a whole, the tax-to-GDP ratio calculated on an unweighted average basis fell marginally in 2003 – the latest year for which complete figures are available – to 36.3%, from 36.4% in 2002 and from a peak of 37.1% in 2000. In 1975, the average tax-to-GDP ratio was 30.3%. The Netherlands showed the biggest percentage-point reduction in the overall share of taxation in its economy, with the tax-to-GDP ratio falling two percentage points to 39.3% of GDP in 2004 from 41.3% in 1975. In Spain, by contrast, the tax-to-GDP ratio jumped by almost 17 percentage points from 18.2% in 1975 to 35.1% in 2004.
Recent changes in tax-to-GDP ratios in many countries have reflected the combined impact of changes in economic growth and lower rates of taxation on personal and corporate income. The OECD average corporate tax fell from 33.6% in 2000 to 29.8% in 2004, while the average top personal income tax rates fell from 47.1% to 44.0%. These resulted in marked falls in revenues between 2000 and 2002, when economic growth was sluggish, but a revival of economies in 2003 led to a recovery in revenues, thanks to the positive impact of growth on incomes and profits, and hence in the overall tax base.
Приложение 2.