
- •11.1 Cooling
- •Table 11.2 Molecular Lowering of the Melting or Freezing Point
- •11.2 Drying and Humidification
- •11.3 Boiling Points and Heating Baths
- •Table 11.8 Organic Solvents Arranged by Boiling Points
- •Table 11.9 Molecular Elevation of the Boiling Point
- •11.4 Separation Methods
- •Table 11.11 Solvents of Chromatographic Interest
- •11.4.1 McReynolds’ Constants
- •11.4.2 Chromatographic Behavior of Solutes
- •11.4.3 Ion-Exchange (Normal Pressure, Columnar)
- •Table 11.16 Guide to Ion-Exchange Resins
- •Table 11.18 Relative Selectivity of Various Counter Anions
- •11.5 Gravimetric Analysis
- •Table 11.19 Gravimetric Factors
- •Table 11.20 Elements Precipitated by General Analytical Reagents
- •Table 11.21 Cleaning Solutions for Fritted Glassware
- •Table 11.25 Tolerances for Analytical Weights
- •Table 11.26 Heating Temperatures, Composition of Weighing Forms, and Gravimetric Factors
- •11.6 Volumetric Analysis
- •Table 11.28 Titrimetric (Volumetric) Factors
- •11.6.3 Standard Volumetric (Titrimetric) Redox Solutions
- •11.6.4 Indicators for Redox Titrations
- •11.6.5 Precipitation Titrations
- •11.6.6 Complexometric Titrations
- •11.6.7 Masking Agents
- •11.6.8 Demasking
- •Table 11.30 Standard Solutions for Precipitation Titrations
- •Table 11.31 Indicators for Precipitation Titrations
- •Table 11.32 Properties and Applications of Selected Metal Ion Indicators
- •Table 11.41 Pipet Capacity Tolerances
- •Table 11.43 Buret Accuracy Tolerances
- •11.7 Laboratory Solutions
- •11.7.1 General Reagents, Indicators, and Special Solutions
- •Table 11.49 TLV Concentration Limits for Gases and Vapors
- •Table 11.52 Chemicals Which Polymerize or Decompose on Extended Refrigeration
- •11.9 Thermometry
- •11.9.1 Temperature and Its Measurement
- •11.10 Thermocouples
- •Table 11.63 Type T Thermocouples: Copper vs. Copper-Nickel Alloy
- •11.11 Correction for Emergent Stem of Thermometers
11.38 |
|
|
|
|
SECTION 11 |
|
TABLE 11.18 Relative Selectivity of Various Counter Anions |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Relative |
Relative |
|
|
|
|
|
selectivity for |
selectivity for |
|
Counterion |
|
|
Dowex 1-X8 resin |
Dowex 2-X8 resin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OH |
|
|
|
|
1.0 |
1.0 |
Benzenesulfonate |
|
|
500 |
75 |
||
|
|
|||||
Salicylate |
|
|
|
450 |
65 |
|
|
|
|
||||
Citrate |
|
|
|
220 |
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
175 |
17 |
I |
|
|
|
|
||
Phenate |
|
|
|
110 |
27 |
|
|
|
|
||||
HSO |
|
|
|
|
85 |
15 |
4 |
|
|
|
|||
ClO |
3 |
|
|
|
74 |
12 |
NO 3 |
|
|
|
65 |
8 |
|
Br |
|
|
|
50 |
6 |
|
CN |
|
|
|
28 |
3 |
|
HSO |
|
|
|
|
27 |
3 |
3 |
|
|
|
|||
BrO |
3 |
|
|
|
27 |
3 |
NO 2 |
|
|
|
24 |
3 |
|
Cl |
|
|
|
|
22 |
2.3 |
ClO |
4 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
SCN |
|
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
HCO |
|
|
|
|
6.0 |
1.2 |
3 |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
5.5 |
0.5 |
|
IO3 |
|
|
|
|
||
H PO2 |
|
|
|
|
5.0 |
0.5 |
4 |
|
|
|
|||
Formate |
|
|
|
4.6 |
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
||||
Acetate |
|
|
|
3.2 |
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
||||
Propanoate |
|
|
|
2.6 |
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
||||
F |
|
|
|
|
1.6 |
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
exchange behavior of a cation because they do not take account of |
the influence of the aqueous |
||||||
phase. More specific information about the behavior to be expected from a cation in a column elution |
|
||||||
experiment is given by the equilibrium distribution coefficient |
|
|
|
|
K |
d . |
|
The partitioning of the potassium ion between the resin and solution phases is described by the |
|||||||
concentration distribution ratio, |
D c : |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(D c )K |
[K ]r |
|
||||
|
[K ] |
|
|
|
|||
Combining the equations for the selectivity coefficient and for |
|
|
|
|
D |
c : |
|
|
(D c )K |
kK/H |
[H ]r |
|
|||
|
[H ] |
|
|
The foregoing equation reveals that essentially the concentration distribution ratio for trace concentrations of an exchanging ion is independent of the respective solution of that ion and that the uptake of each trace ion by the resin is directly proportional to its solution concentration. However, the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRACTICAL LABORATORY INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
|
11.39 |
|||||||||
concentration distribution ratios are inversely proportional to the solution concentration of the resin |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
counterion. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
To |
accomplish any separation of two cations (or two anions), one of these ions |
must |
be taken |
|
||||||||||||||||
up by the resin in distinct preference to the other. This preference is expressed by |
the separation |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
factor (or relative retention), |
|
K/Na, using K |
|
|
and Na |
|
as the example: |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
K/Na |
(D c )K |
|
kK/H |
K |
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(D c )Na |
kNa/H |
K/Na |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
The more |
deviates from unity for a given pair of ions, the easier it will be to separate them. If the |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
selectivity coefficient is unfavorable for the separation of two ions of the same charge, no variation |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
in |
the concentration of H |
|
(the eluant) will improve the separation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
The situation is entirely different if the exchange involves ions of different net charges. Now the |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
separation factor does depend on the eluant concentration. For example, the more dilute the coun- |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
terion concentration in the eluant, the more selective the exchange becomes for the ion of higher |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
charge. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
In practice, it is more convenient to predict the behavior of an ion, for any chosen set of condi- |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
tions, by employing a much simpler distribution coefficient, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D |
g , which is defined as the concentration |
|
|||||||||||
of |
a |
solute in |
the resin phase divided by |
its |
concentration in |
the |
liquid |
phase, or: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D g |
|
concentration |
of solute, |
resin phase |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
concentration of solute, liquid phase |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
D g |
|
% solute within exchanger |
volume of solution |
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
% |
solute within |
solution |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mass of exchanger |
|
|||||||||||||
D |
g |
remains constant over a wide range of resin to liquid ratios. In a relatively short time, by simple |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
equilibration of small known amounts of resin and solution followed by analysis of the phases, the |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
distribution of solutes may be followed under many different sets of experimental conditions. Var- |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
iables requiring investigation include the capacity and percent cross-linkage of resin, |
the type of |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
resin itself, the temperature, and the concentration and pH of electrolyte in the equilibrating solution. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
By comparing the ratio of the distribution coefficients for a pair of ions, a separation factor (or |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
relative retention) is |
obtained for a specific experimental condition. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
Instead of using |
D g , separation data may be expressed in terms of a volume distribution coefficient |
|
||||||||||||||||||
D v , which is defined as the amount of solution in the exchanger per cubic centimeter of resin bed |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
divided by the amount per cubic centimeter in the liquid phase. The relation between |
|
|
|
|
D g and |
D v is |
||||||||||||||||
given by: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D v D g |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
where |
is the bed density of a column expressed in the units of mass of dry resin per cubic centimeter |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
of column. The bed density can be determined by adding a known weight of dry resin to a graduated |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
cylinder containing the eluting solution. After the resin has swelled to its maximum, a direct reading |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
of |
the |
settled |
volume of resin is recorded. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Intelligent inspection of the relevant distribution coefficients will show whether a separation is |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
feasible and what the most favorable eluant concentration is likely to be. In the columnar mode, an |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
ion, even if not eluted, may move down the column a considerable distance and with the next eluant |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
may |
appear in |
the eluate |
much earlier |
than |
indicated by the coefficient in |
the |
first eluant alone. A |
|
11.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECTION |
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
distribution coefficient value of 12 or lower is required to elute an ion completely from a column |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
containing about 10 g of dry resin using 250 to 300 mL of eluant. A larger volume of eluant is |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
required only when exceptionally strong tailing occurs. Ions may be eluted completely by 300 to |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
400 mL of eluant from a column of 10 g of dry resin at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D g values of around 20. The first traces of |
||||||||||
an element will appear in the eluate at around 300 mL when its |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D g |
value is about 50 to 60. |
|||||||||||
Example |
Shaking 50 mL of 0.001 |
M cesium salt solution with 1.0 g of a strong cation exchanger |
|
|
||||||||||||||||
in the H-form (with a capacity of 3.0 mequiv · g |
|
|
|
|
|
1 ) removes the following amount of cesium. The |
|
|||||||||||||
selectivity coefficient, |
|
k Cs/H , is 2.56, thus: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[Cs ]r [H ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
[Cs ][H ]r |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
The maximum |
amount of cesium which can enter the resin is 50 mL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.001 |
M |
0.050 equiv. |
|||||||
The minimum |
value of [H |
|
]r 3.00 |
0.05 |
2.95 mequiv, and the maximum value, assuming |
|
||||||||||||||
complete exchange of cesium ion for hydrogen ion, is 0.001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M |
. The |
minimum |
value of |
the distri- |
|||||
bution ratio is: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.56)(2.95) |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
[Cs ]r |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
(D c )Cs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.001 |
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
[Cs ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
Amount of Cs, resin phase |
(7550)(1.0 g) |
|
|
151 |
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Amount of Cs, solution phase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
50 mL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Thus, at equilibrium the 1.0 g of resin removed is: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
100% |
x |
151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
with all but 0.66% of cesium ions from solution. If the amount of resin were increased to 2.0 g, the |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
amount of cesium remaining in solution would decrease to 0.33%, half the former value. However, |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
if the depleted solution were decanted and placed in contact wit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
h 1 |
g of |
fresh resin, the |
amount of |
|||||||||
cesium remaining in solution would decrease to 0.004%. Two batch equilibrations would effectively |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
remove the |
cesium from the |
solution. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|