Литература / UMTS-Report
.pdf
UMTS 30.06 version 3.0.0 |
|
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
TR 101 146 V3.0.0 (1997-12) |
|
user |
1.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Uplink Satisfied user |
|
|
|
|||
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Downlink Satisfied user |
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
0.0 |
100 |
200 |
300 |
400 |
500 |
600 |
700 |
800 |
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
System Load (kbps/MHz/cell) |
|||||
Figure 56 System Bandwidth 15 MHz
Table 16 UDD 2048 Indoor Simulation Summary
|
Environment |
Cell Capacity |
Spectrum |
|
|
(#User/MHz/Cell) |
Efficiency |
|
|
(UL/DL) |
(kbps/MHz/Cell) |
|
|
(UL/DL) |
|
UDD2048 |
Indoor |
|
240 / 240 |
(10%) |
|
|
|
12.6 System Level Simulation Results (50%speech+50%UDD384)
12.6.1 Indoor Office A
These simulations are in progress and results will be submitted shortly.
UMTS 30.06 version 3.0.0 |
253 |
TR 101 146 V3.0.0 (1997-12) |
13. Conclusion
In this evaluation report we have provided a description of the basic functional blocks that make up the OFDMA system. From this description it should be clear that the OFDMA proposal can be considered as a hybrid OFDM-TDMA scheme.
∙The benefits of using OFDM as the underlying modulation scheme, is that it greatly reduces the required hardware complexity and provides a degree of flexibility in the frequency domain that enables two MACs to be supported by the same basic PHY layer. This inherent frequency flexibility provides operators with frequency deployment options that allows the support of asymmetric up and down links as well as smaller re-farmed portions of spectrum.
∙The benefits of the two software driven TDMA style MACs allow the OFDMA proposal to realistically provide the full complement of UMTS services (including unlicensed operation & high bit-rate support) in a spectrally efficient manner with relatively low complexity terminals.
∙Both MACs have been deliberately designed to share the same basic TDMA framing structure of GSM, making the possibility of dual mode UMTS/GSM terminals/core networks that much more realistic.
∙In addition to this ability to co-exist and work with existing 2nd generation networks, we believe that OFDMA also has the flexibility to expand its horizons for later developments of UMTS.
∙Enhancement techniques already available and proven for TDMA system can be applied to OFDMA easily (e.g. HCS, directional antennas).
In the near future we intend to release further results showing the system capacity for packet data transfer services. We also have work under way to develop a hardware testbed. In the meantime, we look forward to your comments and questions.
UMTS 30.06 version 3.0.0 |
258 |
TR 101 146 V3.0.0 (1997-12) |
15.2 Abbreviations
BCCH |
Broadcast control channel |
CDMA |
Code Division Multiple Access |
DCA |
Dynamic channel assignment |
DCCH |
Dedicated control channel |
DL |
Downlink |
IACH |
Initial acquisition channel |
KERO |
Knowledge enclosed reference operation |
MRC |
Maximal ratio combining |
OBO |
Output Back Off |
OFDMA |
Orthogonal Frequency Multiple Access |
QPSK |
Quadrature Phase Shift Keying |
RACH |
Random access channel |
ROT |
Random orthogonal transform |
RPS |
Random phase shift |
SFH |
Slow Frequency Hopping |
TDMA |
Time Division Multiple Access |
UL |
Uplink |
UMTS |
Universal Mobile Telephone System |
15.3 References
[SMG50402] ETR/SMG-50402 Version 0.9.5.
ETSI draft specification of the Selection procedure for the choice of radio transmission technologies of the Universal Mobile Telecommunication System (UMTS).
[Mueller97] Mueller S., Baeuml R., Fischer R., Huber B; ‘OFMD with reduced Peak-to- Average Power Ratio by Multiple Signal Representation; Annals of Telecommunications; Vol. 52; No. 1-2; pp. 58-67, February 1997.
[Olofsson95] Olofsson H., Naslund J., Sköld J.; ‘Interference Diversity Gain in Frequency Hopping GSM’; Proceedings IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC); Chicago; pp. 102-106; June 1995
[Pauli97] Pauli M., Kuchenbecker H.P.; 'Minimisation of the intermodulation distortion of a nonlinearilty amplified OFDM signal'; Wireless Personal Communications; Vol. 4; No. 1; pp. 93-101; January 1997,.
UMTS 30.06 version 3.0.0 |
259 |
TR 101 146 V3.0.0 (1997-12) |
2)'0$ (YDOXDWLRQ 5HSRUW
The Multiple Access Scheme Proposal for the UMTS Terrestrial Radio Air Interface (UTRA)
Part 2
Link Budget and Technology Description Template
Introduction:
This document contains the link budgets for speech, LCD 144 and LCD384.
For Speech also the new test cases of Vehicular B channel model and MS speed of 250km/h has been tested with excellent performance.
The second part of this document contains the technology description template for the OFDMA system (according to ETR30.03).
|
|
|
Table of Content |
1. |
Link Budget Templates..................................................................................................................... |
260 |
|
|
1.1 |
Link Budget Speech.................................................................................................................... |
260 |
|
1.2 |
Link Budget LCD144 ................................................................................................................. |
262 |
|
1.3 |
Link Budget LCD384 ................................................................................................................. |
263 |
|
1.4 Link Budget UDD144 ................................................................................................................ |
264 |
|
|
1.5 Link Budget UDD384 ................................................................................................................ |
265 |
|
|
1.6 Link Budget UDD2048 .............................................................................................................. |
266 |
|
2. |
Technology Description Template.................................................................................................... |
267 |
|
UMTS 30.06 version 3.0.0 |
260 |
TR 101 146 V3.0.0 (1997-12) |
1. Link Budget Templates
1.1 Link Budget Speech
Test environment |
|
(O) |
(P) |
(V) |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vehicular A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120[km/h] |
|
Item |
|
Down |
Up |
Down |
Up |
Down |
Up |
|
|
Link |
Link |
Link |
Link |
Link |
Link |
Test service |
|
SP |
SP |
SP |
SP |
SP |
SP |
Ave. Tx Power per traffic Ch |
[dBm] |
10.0 |
4.0 |
20.0 |
14.0 |
30.0 |
24.0 |
(a1) Max Tx Power per traffic Ch |
[dBm] |
16.0 |
10.0 |
26.0 |
20.0 |
36.0 |
30.0 |
(a2) Max Total Tx Power |
[dBm] |
16.0 |
10.0 |
26.0 |
20.0 |
36.0 |
30.0 |
(b) Cable, connector, and combiner |
[dB] |
2 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) Transmitter Antenna gain |
[dBi] |
2 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
13 |
0 |
(d1) Tx e.i.r.p. per traffic ch=(a1-b+c) |
[dBm] |
16.0 |
10.0 |
34.0 |
20.0 |
47.0 |
30.0 |
(d2) Total Tx e.i.r.p. = (a2-b+c) |
[dBm] |
16.0 |
10.0 |
34.0 |
20.0 |
47.0 |
30.0 |
(e) Receiver Antenna Gain |
[dBi] |
0 |
2 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
13 |
(f) Cable and Connector Losses |
[dB] |
0 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
(g) Receiver Noise Figure |
[dB] |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
(h) Thermal Noise Density |
[dBm/Hz] |
-174 |
-174 |
-174 |
-174 |
-174 |
-174 |
(i) Receiver Interference Density |
[dBm/Hz] |
-Infty |
-Infty |
-Infty |
-Infty |
-Infty |
-Infty |
(j) total effective noise plus |
[dBm/Hz] |
-169 |
-169 |
-169 |
-169 |
-169 |
-169 |
interfererence |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(k)Information Rate (10 log (Rb)) |
[dBHz] |
45.05 |
45.05 |
45.05 |
45.05 |
45.05 |
45.05 |
|
|
|
|
8.0[kbps] x 4 |
|
|
|
(l) Required Eb/(No+Io) |
[dB] |
10.0 |
10.0 |
11.2 |
11.2 |
5.6 |
5.6 |
with no power control |
|
|
including diversity gain |
|
|||
(m) Receiver sensitivity = (j + k + l) |
[dB] |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
|
113.95 |
113.95 |
111.75 |
111.75 |
118.35 |
118.35 |
(n) Hand-off gain |
[dB] |
5.9 |
5.9 |
4.7 |
4.7 |
4.7 |
4.7 |
(o) Explicit diversity gain |
[dB] |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
included in req.Eb/No |
|
|||
(o') Other gain |
[dB] |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
(p) Log-normal fade margin |
[dB] |
15.4 |
15.4 |
11.3 |
11.3 |
11.3 |
11.3 |
(q) Maximum path loss |
[dB] |
120.35 |
114.45 |
140.15 |
134.15 |
158.75 |
152.75 |
= {d1-m+(e-f)+o+n+o’ -p} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(r) Maximum Range |
[m] |
600.25 |
381.65 |
635.33 |
449.77 |
6514 |
4511 |
(O)L(R[m]) = 37 + 30log( R[m] ) [dB]
(P)L(R[km]) = 148.03 + 40log( R[km] ) [dB]
(V)L(R[km]) = 128.15 + 37.6log( R[km] ) [dB]
