Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
lfw201501-dl.pdf
Скачиваний:
8
Добавлен:
14.04.2015
Размер:
35.85 Mб
Скачать

OPTICAL FILTERS

Optical filter performance keeps improving—measurement techniques must keep pace

AMBER CZAJKOWSKI and STEPHAN BRIGGS

Measuring the new generation of steep

meeting these tough re-

the inspection activities. The same is

bandpass filters with bandwidths

quirements—in fact, fil-

true for performing root cause anal-

less than 1 nm tests the resolution

ter fabricators often

ysis of problems with multi-element

manufacture their comsystems, where accurate measurement

capabilities of instrumentation; more

ponents to specifications

at the component level is critical for

credible measurements in these high-

so tight they can’t be routroubleshooting. Any measurement is

 

 

performance regimes are now required

tinely measured. The

a function of instrument accuracy, but

to advance the boundaries of optical

question with today’s

the issue is particularly challenging for

filter technology.

 

high-performance filters

measuring precision filters, where the

 

becomes: How do you

scale of the spectral features can be fin-

 

 

The telecom boom of the late 1990s

verify they meet their specifications?

er than the resolution of the instrument.

drove advances in many different

 

 

Because modern spectrophotometers

technologies, not the least being opti-

Is your filter made to spec?

are easy to use, operators often over-

cal filter technology. Telecom needed

Verifying that your filter is made to

look the fact that spectral measure-

dense wavelength division multiplying

spec is not simple. Most commercial

ments are not a one-size-fits-all prop-

(DWDM) filters with superior perfor-

spectrophotometers do not simply pro-

osition. The measurement approach

mance, which spurred optical coating

vide an accurate spectral curve; the op-

can vary depending on the type of filter

innovation. Since then, life sciences

erator must have some insight into the

and which feature of the curve requires

and space exploration have continued

measurement method. In other words,

further analysis. For most high-per-

to drive performance requirements and

without proper understanding of how

formance filters, some optics knowl-

revolutionize expectations of how we

the spectrophotometer works, and op-

edge goes a long way to assess spec-

can manipulate light. These fields have

tical limitations of its components, the

tral conformance or, at the very least,

further challenged filter manufactur-

measurement may not be complete-

understanding of the limitations of

ers to deliver on ever-more demand-

ly accurate using just “standard” set-

most commercial spectrophotome-

ing specifications. System designers

tings. That puts a heavy burden on

ters. The following example discuss-

now often demand tight requirements

the user to acquire information about

es a few common limitations of most

such as deep opti-

 

 

 

cal density (OD) blocking coupled with nearly vertical transitions from low signal to high transmission.

Filter manufacturers are becoming adept at

FIGURE 1. To evaluate a 785 nm Raman longpass edge filter for integration into a

spectroscopy setup, the optical engineer faces three measurement challenges: confirm transmission of the passband, resolve and verify that steepness of the nearly vertical edge is <1%, and measure the blocking to ensure >OD6 @ 785 nm.

Laser

Spectrometer

 

Laser-line

Raman

bandpass flter

longpass edge flter

 

Object

Laser Focus World www.laserfocusworld.com

January 2015 105

OPTICAL FILTERS continued

measurement instruments.

Let’s say you need to evaluate a 785 nm Raman longpass edge filter for integration into a spectroscopy setup for a fluorescence imaging system using confocal Raman microscopy, similar to Figure 1. The excitation and emission modes of the fluorophore of interest can be similar in wavelength, so the transition width of the filter (distance in nanometers from 50% to 785 nm laser-line) often needs to be <1% or better. In addition, the intensity of the returned Raman signal is inversely proportional to the fourth power of the excitation wavelength—that’s on the order of 1012 smaller than the excitation intensity.

This means the filter requires very deep attenuation at 785 nm to block any residual laser light emitted from the sample, typically requiring an optical density (OD) >6. Any superfluous light needs to be completely attenuated to detect the extremely small emission signal. Likewise, the transmission of the passband needs to be optimized to transmit as much of the signal wavelength as possible. The spectral performance for the Raman longpass edge filter would resemble Figure 2.

For components like this Raman precision filter, the measurement problem becomes three-fold:

1. Confirm transmission of the passband

Transmission (%)

100

80

Blocking

 

Passband

 

 

60

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Transmission

 

 

 

40

 

 

 

width

 

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

675

725

775

825

875

925

975

1025

1075

785 Wavelength (nm)

FIGURE 2. Spectral performance curve for a typical 785 nm Raman longpass edge filter with OD ≥6.0 coating performance.

2.Resolve and verify the steepness of the nearly vertical edge is <1%

3.Measure the blocking to ensure >OD6

@ 785 nm.

Confirming the transmission of the passband is straightforward and can be performed with any well-calibrated spectrophotometer. The difficulty comes when moving toward the transition edge and beyond to the verification of the OD of the blocking. Determining these values often requires more than one scan, with tradeoffs as to what can be achieved with each measurement. One could bump up the integration time and scan at 0.25– 0.50 nm step intervals to achieve the accuracy needed, but time becomes a major factor and single scans could last up to 30 minutes or longer depending on the desired results.

Effects of spectrophotometer bandwidth

When measuring the very narrow spectral edge of precision filters, you need special care to avoid misleading artifacts. First, the resolution of the instrument can cause a theoretical “square” edge to become a “rounded” edge during the transition from the high transmission region. This is directly related to the spectral bandwidth and area of the diffraction grating—the larger the area of diffraction, the higher the resolution.

For a grating with a given number of lines/mm, a larger grating area provides higher resolution, but adds to the size and cost of the instrument. Similarly, the resolution can be increased by reducing the spectral bandwidth (SBW) parameter, but this has the effect of reducing the amount of light through the instrument, which, in turn, reduces the sensitivity at the detector.

The location of the edge in wavelength space is also important—if the light source is non-collimated and some f/# (cone angle) is present, the edge will exhibit a minor shift. Most spectrophotometers are not perfectly collimated, so it’s best to use very small apertures when measuring to restrict the light to on-axis performance. Again, this decreases the amount of light in and the sensitivity of the system.

Berlin-Brandenburg.

The region for precision.

www.photonics-bb.com

106 January 2015

 

 

 

www.laserfocusworld.com Laser Focus World

Traveling further down the edge of the filter to the 0.1–0.01% region, a “shoulder” or a “sideband measurement artifact” may appear. This feature is unique to very steep transition measurements from high blocking to high transmission, much like this Raman longpass edge filter. It arises from the non-monochro- matic illumination source and SBW effect discussed above.

The instrument scans over a wavelength on the very steep edge and with a non-zero SBW. The finite spectral bandwidth means that instead of being attenuated at the actual OD level of the filter, additional periphery wavelength noise is transmitted by the filter within the band, registering as a signal on the detector. The sum of primary and periphery signals leads to a higher intensity reading than what is actually present. In a commercial instrument, there is little that can be done to reduce this shoulder, except add

 

OPTICAL FILTERS continued

supplementary filtering in the mea-

The noise floor can be reduced by in-

surement path.

creasing the grating SBW, thus allowing

 

more light, which can allow for high-

When there is not

er OD measurement. However, this in-

much to measure

creased sensitivity results in reduced spec-

Lastly, the third measurement problem

tral resolution. Another way to address

arises from sensitivity limitations. As

noise floor is to “baseline” the unit with

mentioned, a filter having a high atten-

a rear beam attenuator, which helps bias

uation (OD >5) has very little light reach-

the dynamic range of the detector.

ing the detector, so you are actually mea-

So, although it’s theoretically feasi-

suring the absence of light. The optical

ble to manufacture optical filters with

and electronic noise at the detector lim-

edge transitions <0.2% and blocking OD

its the lowest signal that can be mea-

>10, the measurement is not yet credi-

sured accurately.

Recall that the Raman signal we are trying to measure is on the order of 1012 smaller than the excitation signal, and most detectors have a dynamic range of 106, which is highly wavelength-depen- dent. This effect is referred to as a “noise floor.” The result is a flat, noisy spectrum that bottoms out at some minimum, even though the theoretical design is known to perform much better.

ble. This is why you often see the fine print “by design” on filter specs—ven- dors are not reluctant to admit these limitations. Experienced filter manufacturers have built custom in-house solutions to address the measurement shortcomings, which might involve a monochromatic high-intensity light source to circumvent the sensitivity issues, in addition to photomultiplier tube arrays for single photon detection.

At Deposition Sciences youíll

 

 

 

 

 

 

!

 

"

 

#$%

 

&'"

 

( &

 

 

www.depsci.com

3300 Coffey Lane, Santa Rosa, CA 95403 Tel (707) 573-6700 / 866-433-7724 Fax (707) 573-6748 email: solutions@depsci.com

Call for Entries

2015 CLEO/Laser Focus World

INNOVATION AWARDS

Showcase Your Products. Reach Top Industry Decision Makers.

Gain Recognition.

CLEO and Laser Focus World announce the call for submissions for the annual Innovation

Awards.This program was established to honor exhibiting companies that have demonstrated outstanding leadership and made significant contributions in advancing the field of optics and photonics.

The winning entry is recognized at the distinguished and widely-attended CLEO Plenary and

Awards Session. In addition, the winning company receives a two-page editorial spread in the

CLEO: 2015 Buyers’ Guide, a video feature on Laser Focus World’s website and more. The winner and all finalists are highlighted in preand post-show promotions and official onsite conference materials.

Submission Deadline: 23 February 2015, 11:59 PM EDT (03:59 GMT)

Please submit entries online at: www.cleoconference.org/InnovationAwards

FEATURED AT

CLEO:2O15

Conference: 10–15 May 2015

THE INNOVATION AWARDS ARE SPONSORED BY:

Exhibition: 12–14 May 2015

CLEO:2O15

 

 

SAN JOSE CONVENTION CENTER

 

®

 

San Jose, California, USA

 

 

However, most consumers are limited to commercial options and can find themselves performing up to three separate measurements, varying instrument parameters like SBW, detector changeover λ, interval step-size, integration time, and rear beam configuration in order to analyze distinct features of filter performance.

The future of high-performance filter measurement

You can imagine that measuring a steep fluorescence bandpass filter, with <1% transitions at either side of the passband and extended OD6 blocking over the entire visible range, is difficult. Ultranarrow filters are even more problematic. These filters have bandwidths <1 nm, which really test an instrument’s resolution capabilities. As design progresses further, measurement will become increasingly more challenging.

Today, optical filters permeate many industries with a diverse range of

OPTICAL FILTERS continued

applications. Not every customer has the luxury to have an optics expert on their staff available to test and evaluate procured components. It’s customary for the filter vendor to provide a performance curve, but it’s helpful if the customer is equipped to interpret data they receive and associate results with known measurement limitations.

Most filter-focused companies can manufacture filters to much tighter specifications than even they can confirm. The marketplace demand for filters, in turn, needs to drive the technology to enable more credible measurement in high-per- formance regimes: the next breakthrough required to really push the boundaries of optical filter technology.

Amber Czajkowski is a thin film engineer and Stephan Briggs is a biomedical engineer at Edmund Optics, Barrington, NJ; email: aczajkowski@edmundoptics.com and sbriggs@edmundoptics.com; www. edmundoptics.com.

InGaAs

Photodiodes

TO-style packages available with flat AR-coated windows, ball lens, and dome lens

Active diameters from 50 µm to 5 mm

Analog bandwidth to 8 GHz

Standard and custom ceramic submounts available

FC, SC, and ST receptacles

Standard axial pigtail package and new miniature ceramic pigtail packages, all available with low back-reflection fiber

Fermionics • 4555 Runway St. • Simi Valley, CA 93063 • Tel: (805) 582-0155 • Fax: (805) 582-1623

w w w . f e r m i o n i c s . c o m

Laser Focus World www.laserfocusworld.com

ANNOUNCEMENT OF A

COMPETITIVE CALL FOR ADDITIONAL PROJECT PARTNERS

Project acronym: LASHARE

Project grant agreement number: 609046

Project full name: Laser Equipment Assessment for High Impact Innovation in the Manufacturing European industry

The project LASHARE is currently active in the Seventh Framework programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities contributing to the creation of the European research area and to innovation (2007-2013). LASHARE requires the participation of new partners to carry out certain tasks within the project. Please note that the Seventh Framework programme offers part-funding not full-funding of research activities. LASHARE has a vacancy in its consortium for partners established in an EU Member State or FP7 Associated State.

LASHARE aims to advance innovative equipment solutions that have been demonstrated at laboratory level, Technology Readiness Level (TRL) 3-4, towards robust prototypes at TRL 7-8. The development is guided by an Assessment Framework that involves an industrial user, an RTD partner and the supplier of the equipment. The laser based equipment assessment (LEA) should focus on the benefit of the supplier which should be an SME. The role of the users is to provide guidance towards requirements and provide the basis for validation.

All assessments shall be related to equipment for laser-based material processing. Suppliers of innovative high-tech equipment are expected to install and assess their prototypes or products in production-like environments and validate them in a manufacturing line or in an industrial environment that is very close to manufacturing conditions. The primary aim is to strengthen the ICT equipment supplier base, predominantly SMEs, through a close cooperation with globally acting manufacturers, by improving the manufacturing processes in relation to quality, speed, environmental and resource efficiency.

The LEAs shall cover innovative laser applications in laser-based material processing and address improvements related to quality, speed, flexibility and resource efficiency of laser-based material processing. The project aims to select between 10 and 12 new LEAs for funding in this competitive call. Each of the LEA teams will consist of a user, a supplier and an RTD partner. The RTD partner must be one of the existing LASHARE RTD partners.

The core task of the laser-based equipment assessment shall focus on sensors and knowledge based ICT systems that enable at least one of the following aspects:

ïautonomous set up of machine and laser parameters for fast and flexible manufacture

ïprocess and quality control for robust processes and

fully documented production

in the area of complex manufacturing tasks.

Opening: 1 February 2014

Deadline: 16 March at 17h00

Expected duration of participation: 24 months

Duration of an assessment: max. 22 months

Funding: Total funding available for new partners amounts to 1,767,000 €; the requested funding for each LEA should not exceed 250,000 €

Call identifier: LASHARE Competitive Call 1

Language of submission: English

Email address: cc@lashare.eu

Web address for further information: www.lashare.eu

LASHARE is also calling for experts to evaluate proposals. If you would like to be considered please visit www.lashare.eu

January 2015 109

Соседние файлы в предмете [НЕСОРТИРОВАННОЕ]