
- •OUTLINE
- •MULTI-LEVEL GOVERNANCE
- •DECENTRALIZATION
- •ISSUES FOR REGIONS: THE ENVIRONMENT IN THE US
- •Federal and Regional programs
- •BOTH GOALS IMPORTANT
- •REGIONAL/FEDERAL PROGRAMS MUST BE COORDINATED
- •ARE RELATIVELY
- •CENTRALIZATION
- •DIFFERENT COUNTRIES
- •RUSSIAN FEDERALISM: EXPERIMENTATION
- •RUSSIA’S FAST ADVANCING
- •WHY MANY COUNTRIES STILL FOLLOW CENTRALIZED MODEL
- •DISTRIBUTED GOVERNANCE
- •EXPERIMENTAL
- •REGIONAL GENERAL ISSUES
- •SPECIAL ISSUES
- •EACH SPHERE HAS BUNDLE
- •HUMAN RESOURCES
- •DROUGHT MANAGEMENT WILL
- •DROUGHT MANAGEMENT
- •REGIONAL PROJECTS FOR
- •FLOOD MANAGEMENT: REGIONAL AND LOCAL
- •WHAT SEEMS TO WORK
- •ANSWERS EMERGING
- •ANSWERS FROM RUSSIA:
- •FEDERAL AND
- •STARTING POINT: 1998
- •THEN DECLINE, THEN
- •WHAT HAPPENED?
- •KALUGA PROJECTS (2005-8) WITH FEDERAL SUPPORT
- •PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP
- •INDUSTRIAL ZONES
- •STARTED WITH 4 MAJOR
- •SPILLOVERS
- •RESULTS
- •PARTNERSHIPS
- •EXPLOITING PROXIMITY TO
- •PROBLEMS
- •SUCCESSFUL REGIONAL PROJECT
- •TECHNOLOGICAL AND INVESTMENT ORIENTATION
- •DIFFUSION OF GOVERNANCE
- •ADAPTABLE TASK-ORIENTED
- •LOOSE AND CONTROLLED
- •INDICATORS FOR CONTROLLED
- •INDICATORS FOR LOOSE

ANSWERS FROM RUSSIA:
LEADERSHIPIn the 1990s, right resources seemed to be the answer (no military industries)
Now it is clear that the right leaders is the answer
|
|
2 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
0 |
|
2 |
|
|
, |
|
|
4 |
|
|
2 |
|
y |
|
|
l |
|
|
Ju |
|
|
ЛЕТНИЙ КАМПУС АКАДЕМИИ ПРИ ПРЕЗИДЕНТЕ РФ -2012 |
33 |

|
|
2 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
0 |
|
2 |
|
|
, |
|
|
4 |
|
|
2 |
|
y |
|
|
l |
|
|
Ju |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
E |
|
|
|
|
|
|
C |
|
|
|
|
|
C |
|
|
|
|
|
U |
|
|
|
|
|
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
T |
|
|
|
|
|
|
N |
|
|
|
|
|
|
I |
|
|
|
|
|
|
JO |
|
|
|
|
|
A e |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
s |
|
|
|
|
G c |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
s |
|
|
|
|
U |
|
c |
|
|
|
|
|
u |
|
|
|
|
|
L h |
|
|
|
||
A w |
s |
|
|
|
||
K r |
t |
|
|
|
|
|
|
i |
|
|
|
|
|
E o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
e |
|
|
|
|
|
|
v |
|
|
|
|
|
H n |
|
|
|
|
|
|
T l |
g |
|
|
|
|
|
i |
|
|
|
|
|
|
l |
|
|
|
|
|
|
i |
|
|
|
|
|
|
p |
|
|
|
|
|
|
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ЛЕТНИЙ КАМПУС АКАДЕМИИ ПРИ ПРЕЗИДЕНТЕ РФ -2012 |
34 |

FEDERAL AND
SUBNATIONALPro-Investment StrategyEFFORT
Begins 2006
Results staggering:
|
|
2 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
0 |
|
2 |
|
|
, |
|
|
4 |
|
|
2 |
|
y |
|
|
l |
|
|
Ju |
|
|
ЛЕТНИЙ КАМПУС АКАДЕМИИ ПРИ ПРЕЗИДЕНТЕ РФ -2012 |
35 |

STARTING POINT: 1998
Location:
•Along Moscow–Kiev motorway, backbone of the spatial economic organization
•Proximitiy to Moscow (170 km)
Regional economy
•Military-oriented (one/half employees in 1980s)
•Machine-building
•Production of transportation and related equipment (mainly for railroads),
• Science, nuclear physics research |
Russia’s |
First Nuclear Reactor: |
|
in Obninsk (106,000 population) |
|
•Few natural resources (some ag, timber, logging)
•Wood-working and paper industries
|
|
2 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
0 |
|
2 |
|
|
, |
|
|
4 |
|
|
2 |
|
y |
|
|
l |
|
|
Ju |
|
|
ЛЕТНИЙ КАМПУС АКАДЕМИИ ПРИ ПРЕЗИДЕНТЕ РФ -2012 |
36 |

THEN DECLINE, THEN
In 1990s, output shrank by almost 60%
After 2006, it began to grow far faster than Russian average
As next figure shows*
*Dmitry Zimin, “Promoting Investment in Russia’s Regions,” Eurasian Geography and Economics, 2010, 51, No. 5, pp. 653–668.
|
|
2 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
0 |
|
2 |
|
|
, |
|
|
4 |
|
|
2 |
|
y |
|
|
l |
|
|
Ju |
|
|
ЛЕТНИЙ КАМПУС АКАДЕМИИ ПРИ ПРЕЗИДЕНТЕ РФ -2012 |
37 |

|
|
2 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
0 |
|
2 |
|
|
, |
|
|
4 |
|
|
2 |
|
y |
|
|
l |
|
|
Ju |
|
|
ЛЕТНИЙ КАМПУС АКАДЕМИИ ПРИ ПРЕЗИДЕНТЕ РФ -2012 |
38 |

WHAT HAPPENED?
“Investment Promotion Machine” as in
Central European States
•Foreign involvement does not always produce wealth (financial gap, no spillovers)
•Require consensus among political and economic elites at national/regional/local level
•No single project can do it
•Requires stable, predictable and honest government
•Greenfield investments work best
|
|
2 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
0 |
|
2 |
|
|
, |
|
|
4 |
|
|
2 |
|
y |
|
|
l |
|
|
Ju |
|
|
ЛЕТНИЙ КАМПУС АКАДЕМИИ ПРИ ПРЕЗИДЕНТЕ РФ -2012 |
39 |

KALUGA PROJECTS (2005-8) WITH FEDERAL SUPPORT
•Public funds invested in industrial parks (techno-parks)
•Public funds invested in transportation infrastructure (Federal investment in Moscow-Kiev motorway connecting Kaluga/Obninsk with Moscow
•Investment financed by borrowing (new corporation)
The Russian Detroit |
|
|
2 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
0 |
|
2 |
|
|
, |
|
|
4 |
|
|
2 |
|
y |
|
|
l |
|
|
Ju |
|
|
ЛЕТНИЙ КАМПУС АКАДЕМИИ ПРИ ПРЕЗИДЕНТЕ РФ -2012 |
40 |

PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP
TECHNOPARK |
“VOLVO- |
VOSTOK” |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
0 |
|
2 |
|
|
, |
|
|
4 |
|
|
2 |
|
y |
|
|
l |
|
|
Ju |
|
|
ЛЕТНИЙ КАМПУС АКАДЕМИИ ПРИ ПРЕЗИДЕНТЕ РФ -2012 |
41 |

INDUSTRIAL ZONES
• Created four industrial zones (linking
Kaluga, Obninsk with businesses)
Public funds reconstructed them, then carefully sold to private investors
• Created One-stop shop for investors
(Kaluga Regional Development Agency)
Helped investors with permissions (environmental, safety), services, meetings with public officials
|
|
2 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
0 |
|
2 |
|
|
, |
|
|
4 |
|
|
2 |
|
y |
|
|
l |
|
|
Ju |
|
|
ЛЕТНИЙ КАМПУС АКАДЕМИИ ПРИ ПРЕЗИДЕНТЕ РФ -2012 |
42 |