Теорграмматика / Блох М.Я. Семенова Т.Н. Тимофеева С.В. - Theoretical English Grammar. Seminars. Практикум по теоретической грамматике английского языка - 2010
.pdf458 |
Seminars on Theoretical English Grammar |
|
|
|
|
Entry |
Definition |
Equivalent terms |
|
|
|
relative generali- |
relative degree of abstraction, working on |
abstraction |
zation |
the level of broad or general concepts |
|
|
Cf: absolute generalization |
|
|
|
|
relevant |
pertinent, applicable, bearing on the issue |
|
|
in question |
|
|
|
|
"repetition" plural |
a specific plural form of the noun which |
|
• |
acquires a pronounced stylistic marking |
|
|
due to the repetition of the noun in the |
|
|
singular, e.g.: He smoked cigarette after |
|
|
cigarette. |
|
|
|
|
replacive mor- |
a morpheme built up on the basis of root |
|
pheme |
(or vowel) interchange; usually a root |
|
|
vowel that replaces another in a categori-al |
|
|
form, e.g.: sing - sang |
|
|
Cf: additive morpheme |
|
|
|
|
representamen |
the type to which a coding convention |
|
|
assigns a certain content by means of |
|
|
certain interpretants; type-expressions |
|
|
conventionally correlated to a type-content |
|
|
by a given culture, irrespective of the fact |
|
|
that they can be used in order to |
|
|
communicate effectively something to |
|
|
somebody (Ch.S. Peirce) |
|
|
Cf.: interpretant, sign |
|
|
|
|
Result (as a |
entity that emerges due to some action, |
Factitive (Ch. |
semantic role) |
e.g.: She has written a letter. |
Fillmore) |
|
|
|
retrospective |
establishing relation between the given |
|
coordination |
action and some prior action or moment |
|
|
|
|
root |
the element left after all affixes have been |
|
|
removed from a complex word, carrying |
|
|
the basic lexical meaning of the word |
|
|
Cf.: nucleus, stem, affix |
|
|
|
|
secondary |
predication expressed by potentially |
potential pre- |
predication |
predicative complexes with non-finite |
dication, in- |
|
forms of the verb and verbal nouns |
complete/par- |
|
Cf.: primary predication |
tial predica- |
|
|
tion, implicit |
|
|
predication, |
|
|
semi-predica- |
|
|
tion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
459 |
|
|
|
|
Entry |
Definition |
I |
Equivalent terms |
segmental |
a morpheme made up by phonemes |
|
|
morpheme |
Cf.: suprasegmental morpheme |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
semantic feature |
(in componential analysis) an elementary |
|
|
|
component of meaning. Their aggrega- |
|
|
|
tion makes up the integral meaning of a |
|
|
|
language unit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
semantics |
the study of meaning of words and |
|
|
|
sentences, their denotations, connota- |
|
|
|
tions, implications, and ambiguities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
semes |
meanings differentiated by the opposition |
|
semantic |
of signemic units |
|
feature |
|
|
|
||
sememe |
a generalized element of meaning |
|
lexico-seman- |
|
tic variant |
||
|
|
|
|
semi-notional |
words which have a complete nominative |
|
|
words |
meaning but fulfil syntactic functions |
|
|
|
typical of functional words. Cf. : notional |
|
|
|
words, functional words |
|
|
|
|
|
|
semi-predicative |
a construction made up by a non-finite |
|
potentially |
construction |
form of the verb and a substantive |
|
predicative |
|
element denoting the subject or object of |
|
construction, |
|
the action expressed by the non-finite |
|
propositional |
|
form of the verb Cf. : fully predicative |
|
construction |
|
construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
semi-proper |
proper nouns with mixed, identifying and |
|
semi-names |
nouns |
typifying, meanings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
sense |
1. = meaning; 2. paradigmatic (intensional) |
|
|
|
|
||
|
meaning. Cf: reference; 3. actual meaning |
|
|
|
of a language unit; |
|
|
|
4. a submeaning, e.g: various senses of the |
|
|
|
word "mark" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
sign |
a material designator of a meaning, a con- |
|
|
|
crete token element used in the concrete |
|
|
|
process of communication and reference. |
|
|
|
Cf: symbol, icon, index, representamen, |
|
|
|
interpretant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
30*
460 |
Seminars on Theoretical English Grammar |
|
|
|
|
Entry |
Definition |
Equivalent terms |
|
|
|
sineme |
a unit of language having a semantic con- |
|
|
tent, e.g.: morpheme, word (M. Blokh) Cf.: |
|
|
cor t erne |
|
|
|
|
significative |
suggestive of a meaning |
|
|
|
|
signifie |
meaning |
|
|
|
|
Singularia |
nouns having only the singular form |
absolute sin- |
Tantum nouns |
Cf.: Pluralia Tantum nouns |
gular nouns |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source (as a |
smth. which gives rise/origin to another |
|
semantic role) |
entity, cause of some action, e.g.: He sells |
|
|
books. |
|
|
|
|
stem |
a term in grammar and word-formation for |
|
|
a root plus the element that fits it into the |
|
|
flow of speech |
|
|
Cf.: root, nucleus, affix |
|
|
|
|
structure |
1 . the set of relations between |
|
|
the elements of a system; |
|
|
2. construction |
|
|
|
|
stylization |
the function of a dicteme which consists in |
|
|
referring it to a particular style (M. Blokh) |
|
|
|
|
subjunct |
a tertiary word in a junction |
|
|
(O. Jespersen) |
|
|
Cf.: adjunct (2) |
|
|
|
|
substance |
1 . the essence or material part; |
|
|
2. the essence which underlies all phenom- |
|
|
ena; |
|
|
3. that which is real; |
|
|
4. that which has qualities and character- |
|
|
istics |
|
|
|
|
substantive |
a noun |
|
suffix |
an affix added at the end of a word, base, |
|
|
or root to form a new word or form of the |
|
|
word |
|
|
Cf.: prefix, infix, root |
|
|
|
|
supplement |
a non-obligatory adjunct |
optional |
|
Cf.: complement |
adjunct |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Glossary of Linguistic Terms |
|
461 |
|
|
|
|
|
Entry |
Definition |
j |
Equivalent terms |
|
|
|
|
suppletivity |
the formation of word-forms from different |
|
|
|
roots Cf.: affixation, inner inflection, outer |
|
|
|
inflection |
|
|
|
|
|
|
suprasegmental |
an element accompanying the realization of |
|
|
unit |
utterances and expressing different modifica- |
|
|
|
tional meanings, such as accent, intonation |
|
|
|
contours, pauses, patterns of word-order Cf.: |
|
|
|
segmental unit/morpheme |
|
|
|
|
|
|
surface structure |
the resultant syntactic construction |
|
|
|
derived through transformations of the |
|
|
|
deep structure Cf.: deep structure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
symbol |
1. smth. that represents smth. else, smth. |
|
|
|
concrete or material used to represent |
|
|
|
smth., abstract or non-material; 2. the |
|
|
|
most arbitrary kind of sign: the word in |
|
|
|
language, the rose representing love in |
|
|
|
literature, etc. (Ch.S. Peirce) |
|
|
|
Cf.: icon, index, sign |
|
|
|
|
|
|
synchronic |
referring to a certain stage in the develop- |
|
|
|
ment of a phenomenon; coexistent |
|
|
|
Cf.: diachronic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
syntagma |
a word-group consisting of two or more |
|
word combi- |
(syntactic) |
notional elements |
|
nation, phrase |
|
|
|
|
syntagmatic |
connected on a linear basis |
|
|
|
Cf.: paradigmatic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
system |
a structured set of elements connected by a |
|
|
|
common function |
|
|
topic |
something about which something is said |
|
|
|
(predicated) Cf.: comment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
topicalization |
1 . process whereby knowledge of certain |
|
|
|
things/individuals is "foregrounded", i.e. |
|
|
|
taken from long-term memory stores to |
|
|
|
some working memory, in which the |
|
|
|
established information may be combined |
|
|
|
with the incoming new information (T.A. |
|
|
|
van Dijk); |
|
|
|
|
|
|
: PRESSI ( HERSON )
462 |
Seminars on Theoretical English Grammar |
|
|
|
|
Entry |
Definition |
Equivalent terms |
|
|
|
|
2. the formation of the informative |
thematization |
|
content of text (M. Blokh) |
|
|
|
|
transformation |
transition from one syntactic pattern to |
|
|
another syntactic pattern with the |
|
|
preservation of its notional parts |
|
|
|
|
Transformational- |
a type of generative grammar, first intro- |
|
Generative |
duced by N. Chomsky ("Three Models for |
|
Grammar |
the Description of Language", 1956). It |
|
|
holds that some rules are transformational, |
|
|
i.e. they change one structure into another |
|
|
according to such prescribed conventions as |
|
|
moving, inserting, deleting, and replacing |
|
|
items. It stipulates two levels of syntactic |
|
|
structure: deep structure (an abstract |
|
|
underlying structure that incorporates all the |
|
|
syntactic information required for the |
|
|
interpretation of a given sentence) and |
|
|
surface structure (a structure that incorpo- |
|
|
rates all the syntactic features of a sentence |
|
|
required to convert the sentence into a |
|
|
spoken or written version) |
|
|
|
|
transitivity |
the ability of a verb to take a direct |
|
|
object |
|
|
Cf.: objectivity |
|
|
|
|
transposition |
the use of a language element in the |
|
|
contextual conditions typical of its • |
|
|
oppositional counter-member by which it |
|
|
fulfils two functions simultaneously Cf.: |
|
|
neutralization |
|
|
|
|
unit |
a constituent of a system |
element |
|
|
|
utterance acts |
uttering words and sentences (J.R. Searle) |
|
valency |
the ability of a language unit to take an |
|
|
adjunct, potential combinability of a |
|
|
language unit |
|
|
|
|
verbal |
a non-finite form of the verb |
verbid |
|
Cf.: finite verb |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Glossary of Pragmalinguistic Terms
Entry |
Definition |
|
|
alerter |
an opening element preceding the actual request (i.e., term of |
|
address, attention getter, endearment term, offensive term, |
|
etc.) |
|
|
appealer |
an element used by a speaker when he wishes to appeal to |
|
the hearer's benevolent understanding. It functions to elicit a |
|
hearer's signal, and occurs in a syntactically final position, |
|
and may signal turn-availability (e.g.: Will you? O'key? |
|
Aren't we?) |
|
|
beneficiary |
the one who benefits from the performing of the act re- |
|
quired by the speaker |
|
|
cajoler |
conventionalized speech item whose semantic content is of |
|
little transparent relevance to the discourse meaning. It |
|
commonly doesn't enter into syntactical structures, but is |
|
interspersed to increase, establish, or restore harmony be- |
|
tween interlocutors, which may be endangered through the |
|
request, etc. (e.g.: You know,...) |
|
|
coerciveness |
imperative force |
|
|
cognitive load |
(= locution, proposition) the literal content of a sentence, |
|
the situation denoted |
|
|
commitment |
an upgrader serving to indicate the speaker's heightened |
indicator |
degree of commitment (involvement) vis-a-vis the state of |
|
affairs referred to in the proposition (e.g.: I'm sure, cer- |
|
tainly, etc.) |
|
|
communicative |
an ability to employ speech acts to achieve the desired com- |
competence |
municative end |
|
|
communicative risk |
a potential breakdown in communication, a failure to |
|
achieve the desired communicative result |
|
|
conventionality |
thesis formulated by J. Searle, according to which certain |
thesis |
forms tend to become conventionally established as the |
|
standard idiomatic forms for indirect speech acts |
|
|
cultural transposi- |
transfer of native speech categories to the target language |
tion |
|
|
|
directness |
the degree to which the speaker's illocutionary intent is |
|
apparent from the locution. In this sense it is a pragmalin- |
|
guistic category which leads itself to psycholinguistic vali- |
|
dation. It is related, but by no means coexistive, with po- |
|
liteness |
|
|
464 |
Seminars on Theoretical English Grammar |
|
|
Entry |
Definition |
|
|
downtoner |
a sententional or prepositional modifier which is used by a |
|
speaker in order to modulate the impact his speech act is |
|
likely to have on the hearer (e.g.: possibly, perhaps) |
|
|
hedge |
an internal modifier used by the speaker to avoid a precise |
|
prepositional specification and, consequently, the potential |
|
provocation of such precision (e.g.: somehow, kind (sort) |
|
of) |
|
|
illocutionary point |
the purpose of communication, or of a particular speech |
|
act; the speaker's intent = illocutionary intent |
|
|
indirectness |
an intended exploitation of a gap between the speaker's |
|
meaning and the utterance's meaning: the hearer identifies |
|
an utterance as a hint. As a result of this belief he assigns |
|
the speaker some hidden intention |
|
|
intensifler |
an upgrader used to intensify elements of the proposition |
|
(e.g.: a terrible/frightful man ) |
|
|
interactional style |
a method (or a complex of methods) employed by the |
|
speaker to achieve a particular illocutionary point and char- |
|
acterizing him this or that way |
|
|
interactive con- |
fundamental concerns influencing the choice of strategies in |
straints |
a message. They are: |
|
1. appropriateness: "be polite"; 2. efficiency |
|
(effectiveness): "be clear, direct"; 3. concern for |
|
minimizing imposition; 4. concern for avoiding negative |
|
evaluation by the hearer; |
|
5. likelihood of use (of a strategy within a specific request |
|
situation) |
|
|
internal modifiers |
elements within the utterance proper, the presence of which |
|
is not essential for the utterance to be potentially under- |
|
stood as, for example, a request. They serve as indicating |
|
devices used to signal pragmatic force, and as socio-prag- |
|
matic devices meant to affect the social impact the utter- |
|
ance is likely to have (downgraders and upgraders) |
|
|
interpersonal end |
the purpose of maintaining relationship between the speaker |
|
and the hearer |
|
|
locution |
aspect of an utterance which consists in its cognitive load |
|
|
Glossary of Pragmalinguistic Terms |
465 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
Entry |
Definition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
locution derivable |
(= obligation statement) the illocutionary intent which is |
|
|
|
directly derivable from the semantics of the locution |
|
|
|
|
|
|
locutionary force |
the act of speaking, the form and content of the utterance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
negative politeness |
(=deference politeness, concern for minimizing imposition) |
|
|
|
the degree to which an utterance avoids imposing on the |
|
|
|
hearer's freedom of actions; means of protecting the hear- |
|
|
|
er's negative face |
|
|
|
|
|
|
performative |
a verb that characterizes the relationship between the speaker |
|
|
|
and the addressee explicating the illocutionary force of the |
|
|
|
utterance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
performative |
a structure that involves the speaker's attempts to get the |
|
|
structure |
hearer to perform some action by virtue of the hearer hav- |
|
|
|
ing recognized that such an attempt is being made |
|
|
|
|
|
|
perlocutionary |
the effect of the utterance on the addressee |
|
|
force |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
politeness marker |
an internal modifier added to a request to bid for cooper- |
|
|
|
ative behaviour (e.g.: you know, please, etc.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
politeness theory |
pragmatic theory formulated by G. Leech, according to |
|
|
|
which the speaker may be willing to save the hearer's face |
|
|
|
by means of a polite and tactful behaviour in a context of a |
|
|
|
face-threatening request |
|
|
|
|
|
|
pragmatic error/ |
failure to convey or comprehend the intended illocutionary |
|
|
deficit |
force or politeness value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
pragmatic opacity |
(= indirectness) lack of transparency specifically and in- |
|
|
|
tentionally employed by the speaker to convey a meaning |
|
|
|
which differs, in some way, from the utterance meaning |
|
|
|
|
|
|
pragmatic transfer |
transfer of native procedures and lingual means of speech |
|
|
|
act performance to interlanguage communication |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principle of |
"make your conversational contribution such as required, |
|
|
cooperation |
at the stage at which it occurs, by the accepted purpose or |
|
|
|
direction of the talk exchange in which you are engaged" |
|
|
|
(Grice) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- of manner |
"be clear, brief, avoid obscurity" (Grice) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- of quality |
"speak only the truth" (Grice) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- of relevance |
"speak to the point" (Grice) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- of politeness |
"save the addressee's face, be polite" (Grice) |
|
|
|
|
|
: PRESSI ( HERSON )
466 |
Seminars on Theoretical English Grammar |
|
|
Entry |
Definition |
|
|
- of effective means |
(= rationality principle) "Given a desired end, one is to |
|
choose that action which most effectively, and at least cost, |
|
attains that end" (Kosher) |
|
|
prepositional |
the cognitive content of an utterance (= locution); one of |
content |
the components, alongside of the pragmatic component, |
|
of the semantics of an utterance |
|
|
sentence meaning |
standard interpretation assigned by a particular lingual |
|
structure only |
|
|
sociopragmatics |
sociological interface of pragmatics that studies the ways |
|
in which pragmatic performance is subjected to specific |
|
social conditions |
|
|
sociopragmatic |
a factor determining the specific character of communica- |
factor |
tion: age, sex, relative status of the interlocutors, situational |
|
constraints, degree of familiarity, etc. |
|
|
sociopragmatic |
the error learners commit when they assess the relevant |
failure |
situational factors as the basis of their native socioprag- |
|
matic norms |
|
|
speech act |
a form of interpersonal communication which is distin- |
|
guished by a specific communicative intention of the speaker |
|
and its own linguistic markers |
|
|
subjectivizers |
elements by which the speaker explicitly expresses his sub- |
|
jective opinion vis-a-vis the state of affairs referred to in |
|
the proposition, thus lowering the assertiveness of the re- |
|
quest (e.g.: I'm afraid, I wonder, I think) |
|
|
supportive move |
a unit external to the request which modifies its impact by |
|
either aggravating or mitigating its force |
|
|
understater |
an internal modifier by means of which the speaker under- |
|
represents the state of affairs denoted in the proposition (a |
|
bit, a little) |
|
|
upgrader |
an element which functions to increase the impact of a re- |
|
quest: intensifier, commitment indicator, expletive, time |
|
intensifier, lexical uptoner, determination marker, repeti- |
|
tion of request, orthographical (supersegmental) emphasis, |
|
emphatic addition |
|
|
utterance meaning |
meaning rendered in a specific context by having the hearer |
|
recognize the intention of the speaker |
|
|
want statement |
a statement which contains the expression of the speaker's |
|
volition, desire |
|
|
Bibliography
. . - .- ., 1964.
. . - ., 1976.
. : . . . -., 1988. . .
- ., 1999.
. . . -
. - .: , 1969.
. . - ., 1955.
. . -
. - ., 1967.
. .
.- ., 1975.
. . - ., 1979.
. -
. - , 1985.
. . - , 1998,
. . -
: . . ... . . - ., 1975.
. . -
// . - 1977. - 2. - . 78-87.
. . - ., 1976.
. //
. . . - ., 1999.
. . - ., 2000.
. // -
. - 2000. - 4.
., . , -
. - ., 2001.
. . - ., 1974.
. . -
. - ., 1971.
. . -
. - ., 1975.
. . - ., 1993.
. // . - . 16. . - ., 1985. - . 251-275.
. , , . - ., 1997.
. . -
. - ., 1975.
. . - ., 1960.
. . . - ., 1981.
. . . - ., 2001.
. . - ., 2001.
. . , , . - ., 1989.
. . - ., 1977. . .
. - ., 1976.
. . -
., 1973.
., ., . -
. - ., 1981.
. .- ., 1968.
., ., ., . -
( ). - ., 1969.
. . - ., 1990.
. . -
. - ., 1975.
. . - ., 1978.
. - ., 1990.
. . . - ., 1972.
. // -
. - . 10. - ., 1981.
. . . .
. - ., 1967.
. - , 1996.
. . - ., 1981.
. . -
// . - 1972. - 2.
: PRESSI ( HERSON )
Bibliography |
469 |
.
// . . . - . 36. - 1977. - 4.
. . - ., 1989.
. . - , 1971.
. . . - , 1976.
. -
: . . ... . . . - ., 1983.
. : -
. - ., 2001.
. // -
. - . 17. - ., 1986. - . 195-222.
. -
. - ., 1981.
. . - ., 1959.
. . - ., 1957.
. . . - ., 1977.
. . -
. - ., 1981.
. . -
: . . ... .
. . - ., 2001.
. . -
. - ., 1986.
. . - ., 1986.
. // . - . 10.- ., 1981.- . 369-495.
. //
. - . 10. - ., 1981. - . 496-530.
-. . / . . , . , . -
. - ., 1997.
. . - ., 1969.
. « » //
. - . 4. - ., 1965.
470 |
Seminars on Theoretical English Grammar |
Bibliography |
471 |
. . . .
., 1992.
. . - ., 1976.
. . -
. - ., 1995.
Austin J. How To Do Things With Words. - Oxford, 1962.
Blokh M. Y. A Course in Theoretical English Grammar. - M., 2000. BloomfleldL. Language. -N.Y., 1933.
Bryant M. A Functional English Grammar. - N.Y., 1945. Burchfield R. The English Language. - Oxford, 1985.
Chomsky N. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. - Cambridge, Mass., 1965.
Chomsky N. Studies on Semantics in Generative Grammar. - The Hague: Mouton, 1980.
Curme G. O. A Grammar of the English Language. - Vol. 3. Syntax. - Boston, N.Y., 1935.
Dijk T.A. van. Text and Context. Explorations in the Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse. -N.Y., 1977.
Eco U. The Role of the Reader (Explorations in the Semantics of Texts). - Bloomington, 1984.
Firth J.R. Papers in Linguistics 1934-1951. - London, 1957. Francis W.N. The Structure of American English. - N.Y., 1958. Fries Ch. American English Grammar. - N.Y., London, 1940. Fries Ch. The Structure of English. - N.Y., 1952.
Ganshina M.A., Vasilevskaya N.M. English Grammar. - M., 1964.
Gardiner A. The Theory of Proper Names. - Oxford, 1954.
Haas W. Linguistic Relevance//In Memory of J.R. Firth. - London, 1966. Halliday M.A.K. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. - London, 1995. Halliday M.A.K., Hasan R. Cohesion in English. - Longman, 1976.
HarrisZ. Structural Linguistics. -Chicago, 1960.
Hill A. Introduction to Linguistic Structures. - N.Y., 1958. Hockett C. A Course in Modern Linguistics. - N.Y., 1955. llyish B.A. The Structure of Modern English. - L., 1971.
Jespersen O. The Philosophy of Grammar. - N.Y., 1924.
Jespersen O. Essentials of English Grammar. - L., 1933.
Joos M. The English Verb, Form and Meaning. - The University of Wisconsin Press, 1964.
Kruisinga E. A Handbook of Present-Day English. Part II. - Groningen, 1931.
Leech G.N. Explorations in Semantics and Pragmatics. - Amsterdam, 1980. Leech G., SvartvikJ. A Communicative English Grammar. - M., 1983. Lock G. Functional English Grammar. - Cambridge, 1966.
Lyons J. Semantics. - Vol. 1-2. - Cambridge, London, N.Y., Melbourne, 1977.
NesfieldJ.C. English Grammar: Past and Present. - London, 1944. Nida E. Morphology. - Ann Arbor, 1965.
Palmer F.R. Semantics. A New Outline. - Cambridge, 1977. Palmer F.R. Modality and the English Modals. - London, 1979.
Quirk R., Greenbaum S., Leech G., Svartvik J. A University Grammar of English. - M., 1982.
Roberts P. English Syntax. An Introduction to Transformational Grammar. -N.Y., 1964.
Robins R.H. General Linguistics. An Introductory Survey. - Lnd., 1985.
Searle J.R. Speech Acts. An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. - Cambridge, 1969.
Stokoe H.R. The Understanding of Syntax. - London, 1937. Strong B. Modern English Structure. - L., 1962.
Sweet H. A New English Grammar, Logical and Historical. - Part 1. - Oxford, 1903.
Sweet H. The Practical Study of Languages. - Oxford, 1964.
Thomas O. Transformational Grammar and the Teacher of English. - London, 1969.
Wierzbicka A. A Semantic Basis for Grammatical Typology // Discourse Grammar and Typology / Ed. by A.T. Givon, S.A. Thompson. - Cambridge, 1995.
)
. .
3. .
.
.
. .
. .
.
06236 09.11.01
« »
. . , 214000, . , . . , 2.
: PRESSI ( HERSON )