Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_232_библиотеки_им_акад_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
13.10.2026
Размер:
2 Мб
Скачать
☆
3. Laparoscopic Entr
y
Techniques: Consensus 3
3
5
3. Wu MH, Lin CC, Yan
g
YC, et al. Cardiovascular collapse durin
g
gy
naecolo
g
ic lapa-
roscop
y
comp
l
icate
d
by
pu
l
monar
y
e
d
ema: report o
f
a case. J Formos Me
d
Assoc
.
1994;93:629–632.
5
4. Peterson HB, Hu
lk
a JF, P
h
i
ll
ips JM. American Association o
f
Gynaeco
l
ogic Laparos-
copists’ 1988 mem
b
ers
h
ip survey on operative
l
aparoscopy. J Repro
d
Me
d.
5:5
8
7–5
89
.
5
5. Levy BS, Hulka JF, Peterson HB, et al. Operative laparoscopy: American Association
o
f Gynaecologic Laparoscopists, 1993 membership survey. J Am Assoc Gynaecol
La
p
arosc. 1994;1:301–305.
5
6. Vilos GA. Laparoscopic bowel in
j
uries: fort
y
liti
g
ated
gy
naecolo
g
ical cases in
C
anada. J Obstet G
y
naecol Can
.
2002;24:224–230
.
5
7. Chandler JG, Corson SL, Wa
y
LW. Three spectra of laparoscopic entr
y
access in
j
u
-
ries. J Am Co
ll
Sur
g
.
2001
;
192
:47
8
–4
90.
5
8. Lam A, Rosen DMB. Laparoscopic
b
owe
l
an
d
vascu
l
ar comp
l
ications: s
h
ou
ld
t
h
e
V
erres nee
dl
e an
d
cannu
l
a
b
e rep
l
ace
d
? J Am Assoc G
y
naeco
l
Laparosc
.
199
6;
1:
301
–
30
5.
5
9. Ternamian AM. Laparoscopy wit
h
out trocars.
S
urg En
d
osc.
7
;11
:
81
5–
818
.
6
0. Ternamian AM, Deitel M. Endoscopic threaded imaging port (Endo TIP) for lapa-
roscopy: experience with different body weights. Obes Surg
.
1999
;
9:44–47.
6
1. Garr
y
R. Towards evidence-based laparoscopic entr
y
techniques: clinical problems
a
n
d
d
il
e
mm
as.
G
y
naecol Endosc.
999;8:403–406
.
https://t.me/med1917
4
. Complications of Laparoscopic Surger
y
fo
r En
do
metri
o
si
s
J
eremy T. Wrigh
t
C
omp
l
ications o
f
l
aparoscopic surgery are in
f
act
f
ewer t
h
an t
h
ose reporte
d
f
or
l
aparotomy [1],
b
ut t
h
eir potentia
l
severity an
d
t
h
e
f
ai
l
ure to
d
iagnose
th
em quic
kl
y an
d
treat t
h
em e
ff
ective
l
y means t
h
at t
h
e patient can
b
e severe
ly
ill
b
e
f
ore a
d
iagnosis is ma
d
e, wit
h
catastrop
h
ic resu
l
ts. Ina
d
vertent
b
owe
l
i
njury at
l
aparotomy is regar
d
e
d
as a recognize
d
h
azar
d
, particu
l
ar
l
y
d
uring
adh
esio
l
ysis. Suc
h
enterostomies are usua
ll
y imme
d
iate
l
y recognize
d
an
d
r
epaire
d
wit
h
minima
l
postoperative seque
l
ae.
Adh
esio
l
ysis at
l
aparoscopy,
h
owever, is usua
ll
y carrie
d
out using
h
ig
h-
e
nergy sources suc
h
as
d
iat
h
ermy,
l
aser energy, or u
l
trasoun
d
. T
h
ese tec
h-
n
iques may cause isc
h
emic
d
amage t
h
at is not apparent at t
h
e time o
f
proce
d
ure
a
n
d
may present to anot
h
er p
h
ysician some
d
ays
l
ater. Conservative manage
-
m
ent wi
ll
f
urt
h
er
d
e
l
ay
d
iagnosis, so t
h
at t
h
e patient
b
ecomes grave
l
y i
ll
.
S
urgery t
h
en wi
ll
usua
ll
y require
f
eca
l
d
iversion, an
d
t
h
ere wi
ll
b
e mu
l
tisystem
f
ai
l
ure, a varia
bl
e stay on an intensive care unit, an
d
possi
bl
y even
d
eat
h
.
I
nevita
bl
y, suc
h
cases wi
ll
b
e su
b
ject to critica
l
inci
d
ent appraisa
l
s, poten
-
t
ia
l
interna
l
investigations
f
or assessment o
f
sa
f
e practice, Genera
l
Me
d
ica
l
C
ounci
l
comp
l
aints, an
d
civi
l
l
itigation
f
or persona
l
injury an
d
neg
l
igence
1
]
.
O
perative
l
aparoscopy a
l
ways carries t
h
e potentia
l
f
or severe comp
l
ica-
t
ions. T
h
is c
h
apter examines strategies
f
or avoi
d
ing an
d
re
d
ucing t
h
ese as
m
uc
h
as possi
bl
e.
ndometriosis Surger
y
E
n
d
ometriosis surgery is associate
d
wit
h
a particu
l
ar
l
y
h
ig
h
ris
k
f
or com
-
plications. Superfi
cial peritoneal disease such as powder burn, sago grain,
fl
ame hemorrhages, and white scars are frequently found in the ovarian fossae,
o
n t
h
e uterosacra
l
l
igaments, an
d
in t
h
e pouc
h
o
f
Doug
l
as. T
h
ey over
l
ie t
h
e
g
reat vesse
l
s o
f
t
h
e pe
l
vis, t
h
e ureter, an
d
possi
bl
y t
h
e rectum at t
h
e peritonea
l
refl
ection in the pouch of Douglas. Ovarian involvement may also include the
v
ascu
l
ar ovarian
l
igament an
d
t
h
e vascu
l
ar p
l
exus over
l
ying t
h
e ureter. Treat
-
m
ent o
f
t
h
ese areas
b
y a
bl
ation, t
h
ermocoagu
l
ation, or
l
aser vaporization runs
th
e ris
k
o
f
t
h
erma
l
d
amage to un
d
er
l
ying structures, w
h
ic
h
may not
b
e imme-
d
iate
l
y apparent
.
https://t.me/med1917
4. Complications of Laparoscopic Surger
y
for Endometriosis 3
5
M
ore a
d
vance
d
d
isease an
d
previous sur
g
er
y
l
ea
d
to mar
k
e
d
anatomica
l
d
istortion. A
dh
esive
b
owe
l
d
isease
f
requent
ly
invo
l
vin
g
t
h
e si
g
moi
d
co
l
on an
d
a
l
so sma
ll
b
owe
l
l
esions, o
bl
iteration o
f
t
h
e pe
l
vic cu
l
d
e sac
by
uterosacra
l
an
d
rectovagina
l
en
d
ometriosis, an
d
invasion o
f
t
h
e muscu
l
aris o
f
t
h
e rectum,
particularly at the peritoneal refl ection, add hazard to this already diffi
cu
l
t
s
ur
g
er
y
. Mana
g
ement o
f
fi
b
rotic no
d
u
l
ar rectova
g
ina
l
en
d
ometriosis can
l
ea
d
to
l
arge
b
owe
l
d
amage, sma
ll
b
owe
l
d
amage (as sma
ll
b
owe
l
a
dh
esions to t
h
is
area are not uncommon), ureteric damage, and signifi
cant hemorrhage.
F
i
g
ure 4.1 s
h
ows severe in
fi
l
tratin
g
no
d
u
l
ar en
d
ometriosis o
f
t
h
e
l
e
f
t u
l
tra-
s
oun
d
l
igament. Me
d
ia
ll
y t
h
ere is tet
h
ering o
f
t
h
e rectum to t
h
e
l
igament, t
h
e
muscu
l
aris
b
eing invo
l
ve
d
. Latera
ll
y t
h
e ureter can
b
e seen
d
rawn me
d
ia
ll
y
an
d
cau
d
a
ll
y
b
y t
h
e
d
isease. Latera
l
to t
h
is is t
h
e uterine vascu
l
ature, t
h
e area
itse
lf
b
eing
h
emorr
h
agic an
d
in
fl
ame
d
. Excision requires care
f
u
l
d
issection
an
d
preservation o
f
t
h
e ureters,
bl
oo
d
vesse
l
s, an
d
recta
l
wa
ll
.
E
n
d
ometriosis o
f
t
h
is nature gives rise to severe symptoms, particu
l
ar
ly
b
ac
k
ac
h
e,
d
yspareunia, an
d
d
ysc
h
ezia. Dysc
h
ezia, or pain
f
u
l
d
e
f
ecation, is a
very important symptom to e
l
icit. It is
f
requent
l
y associate
d
wit
h
pain sitting
d
own, particu
l
ar
l
y
d
uring t
h
e menses. Inquiry s
h
ou
ld
esta
bl
is
h
w
h
et
h
er t
h
is
s
ymptom is present t
h
roug
h
out t
h
e menstrua
l
cyc
l
e or on
l
y
d
uring menses [2].
Pain
d
uring menses is
l
i
k
e
l
y to
b
e associate
d
wit
h
partia
l
recta
l
invo
l
vement,
i.e., t
h
e recta
l
mucosa is spare
d
, an
d
on
l
y t
h
e peritonea
l
sur
f
ace an
d
muscu
l
aris
are invo
l
ve
d
, w
h
ereas continuous recta
l
pain an
d
d
ysc
h
ezia suggest
f
u
ll
t
h
ic
k
-
ness invo
l
vement, w
h
ic
h
h
as o
b
vious signi
fi
cance in p
l
anning treatment an
d
counse
l
ing
f
or t
h
e patient
.
igure 4.1
.
Left ultrasound ligament showing a filtrating and nodular endometriosis
.
https://t.me/med1917
3
6 J.T. Wri
g
ht
at
i
ent Counsel
i
n
g
Ad
equate preoperative patient counse
l
in
g
can prevent muc
h
nee
dl
ess
c
omp
l
aint
l
iti
g
ation. Most women wit
h
t
h
is
d
isease are
d
esperate
f
or
h
e
l
p; t
h
e
y
h
ave severe s
y
mptoms and have usuall
y
had multiple dia
g
nostic procedures,
trials of hormone manipulation, and possible superfi
cial destructive therapy
t
o t
h
e
d
isease usin
g
a
bl
ative or vaporizin
g
tec
h
niques. Bot
h
h
ormona
l
manipu
-
lation and ablative or vaporization therapy cause fi
brosis and scarring without
fully removing what is often deeply infi
ltrating disease.
T
he patient’s histor
y
has to be taken methodicall
y
, and each episode of
t
reatment carefull
y
documented. Questionnaires with structured questions are
u
seful in documentin
g
severit
y
of s
y
mptoms and previous interventions and
t
heir outcome. Computer pro
g
rams linked to databases are a ver
y
useful data-
c
ollection tool, either in real time or subse
q
uent to consultations [3]. The
p
atient histor
y
should be supplemented b
y
careful ph
y
sical examination, with
p
articular reference to notin
g
areas of tenderness and nodularit
y
in the utero-
sacral ligament and posterior pelvic pouch. All the fi
ndings require careful
d
ocumentation, preferabl
y
usin
g
a structured approach. Followin
g
this, the
patient should be given a realistic appraisal of the likely benefi
ts an
d
com
pl
ica-
t
ions o
f
sur
g
er
y
, inc
l
u
d
in
g
t
h
e ris
k
s o
f
ureteric or
b
owe
l
d
ama
g
e, an
d
t
h
e pos
-
sibility of hemorrhage signifi
cant enough to require blood transfusion. The
n
eed for laparotom
y
to deal with an
y
of these complications must be stressed
.
I
t should be emphasized that the purpose of sur
g
er
y
is to remove the areas
of infi
ltrating endometriosis and that this will be carried out using the best
a
vai
l
a
bl
e means,
b
e it
l
aparoscop
y
or
l
aparotom
y
.
A
ll
p
atients should have osmotic and mechanical bowel
p
re
p
aration
p
rior
t
o sur
g
er
y
, supplemented when necessar
y
b
y
on-table rectal lava
g
e prior to the
defi
nitive procedure being carried out.
I
t is wise to
d
ocument t
h
e a
d
vice t
h
at is
g
iven to patients, an
d
t
h
e aut
h
or
s
upp
l
ements t
h
is wit
h
a persona
l
l
etter to t
h
e patient out
l
inin
g
t
h
e con
d
ition,
history, physical fi
ndings, proposed surgery, and likely complications. Such
explanation, although time-consuming, signifi
cantly reduces the risk of patient
c
om
pl
aint
.
Surg
i
cal Techn
i
ques
D
issection should start and sta
y
in normal tissue surroundin
g
the endo
-
m
etriotic lesion, aimin
g
to remove the area with a small rim of normal tissue.
A
s the disease is frequently peritoneal, the surgeon should aim to stay as
superfi
cial as possible, dissecting away from great vessels. Energy sources such
a
s diatherm
y
or laser vaporization work much better when the tissue is under
t
ension, and the use of probes, such as a rectal probe or va
g
inal probe, will
h
elp considerabl
y
both in maintainin
g
tension and keepin
g
these structures
a
wa
y
f
rom t
h
e area o
f
d
issection, an
d
t
h
us ina
d
vertent
d
ama
g
e. Hemostasis is
sometimes diffi
cult to achieve, but immediate identifi
cation and coagulation
of
sma
ll
-vesse
l
bl
ee
d
in
g
wi
ll
a
ll
ow
d
issection to procee
d
quic
kly
, a
l
t
h
ou
gh
https://t.me/med1917
4. Complications of Laparoscopic Surger
y
for Endometriosis 3
7
patients w
h
o
h
ave
h
a
d
mu
l
tip
l
e sur
g
eries wi
ll
f
requent
ly
un
d
er
g
o consi
d
era
bl
e
venous an
d
capi
ll
ary oozing (Figure 4.2)
.
Copious suction and irrigation will help to keep the operative fi
e
ld
c
l
ear,
b
ut t
h
e steep Tren
d
e
l
en
b
urg position o
f
ten a
d
opte
d
d
uring t
h
is sort o
f
surgery
means that considerable volumes of fl
uid will collect in the abdominal cavity
an
d
t
h
at
b
owe
l
wi
ll
fl
oat on t
h
is, risin
g
h
i
gh
er in t
h
e a
bd
omen an
d
o
b
scurin
g
t
h
e view. Re
g
u
l
ar suction an
d
a continuous c
h
ec
k
on t
h
e vo
l
umes in
f
use
d
into
an
d
aspirate
d
f
rom t
h
e a
bd
omina
l
cavity wi
ll
h
e
l
p
k
eep t
h
e situation un
d
er
contro
l
. During t
h
e proce
d
ure, recta
l
integrity s
h
ou
ld
b
e routine
l
y c
h
ec
k
e
d
,
and this can be quickly and easily carried out by fl ooding the pelvis with fl
ui
d
an
d
passing air un
d
er pressure into t
h
e rectum, w
h
ic
h
can
b
e simp
l
y ac
h
ieve
d
b
y using a
bl
a
dd
er syringe.
I
n many centers, t
h
is sort o
f
surgery is
b
est carrie
d
out using a team
approac
h
, as a segmenta
l
recta
l
resection or anterior-wa
ll
d
isc resection ma
y
b
e necessary, an
d
t
h
e gyneco
l
ogist may not
h
ave t
h
e s
k
i
ll
s or experience to
e
ff
ect a competent repair. T
h
e growt
h
o
f
l
aparoscopic
b
owe
l
surgery means
t
h
at many units wi
ll
h
ave surgeons wit
h
t
h
e necessary s
k
i
ll
s, an
d
a goo
d
wor
k
in
g
partners
h
ip can si
g
ni
fi
cant
ly
increase patient sa
f
et
y
. Particu
l
ar
caution is necessary w
h
en a gyneco
l
ogist is as
k
e
d
to un
d
erta
k
e a proce
d
ure or
give an opinion on a patient w
h
o is a
l
rea
d
y anest
h
etize
d
, w
h
ic
h
regretta
bly
can
b
e quite commonp
l
ace. As experience an
d
s
k
i
ll
in
l
aparoscopic proce
d
ures
grow, particu
l
ar
l
y among surgeons in training, requests to atten
d
t
h
e operat
-
ing t
h
eater w
h
en severe en
d
ometriosis is unexpecte
dl
y con
fi
rme
d
are increas-
ing
l
y common. T
h
e surgeon may
b
e invite
d
to un
d
erta
k
e a
d
iagnostic or
t
h
erapeutic proce
d
ure on a patient w
h
o is poor
l
y prepare
d
,
b
ot
h
emotiona
lly
an
d
p
h
ysica
ll
y. Bowe
l
injury in t
h
ese circumstances may
l
ea
d
to consi
d
era
bl
y
f
eca
l
soi
l
ing, an
d
h
emorr
h
age may occur, a situation w
h
ere on
l
y emergenc
y
resources rat
h
er t
h
an previous
l
y crossmatc
h
e
d
bl
oo
d
are avai
l
a
bl
e. A patient
gure 4.2. Pe
l
vis wit
h
perioperative vagina
l
h
emorr
h
age
.
https://t.me/med1917
3
8 J.T. Wri
g
ht
wh
o
h
as
b
een ina
d
equate
ly
assesse
d
an
d
counse
l
e
d
wi
ll
not ta
k
e
k
in
dly
to
w
a
k
in
g
up wit
h
a
l
aparotom
y
/
f
eca
l
d
iversion an
d
a
bl
oo
d
trans
f
usion runnin
g
.
I
n t
h
ese circumstances
,
care
f
u
l
assessment an
d
d
ocumentation wit
h
a view to
undertaking defi
nitive surgery at a later date is far preferable to undertaking
a
n imme
d
iate proce
d
ure, re
g
ar
dl
ess o
f
h
ow muc
h
pressure one is un
d
er.
I
nvitations ma
y
a
l
so
b
e exten
d
e
d
to un
d
erta
k
e t
h
ese proce
d
ures on co
l-
l
eagues’ patients w
h
om t
h
e surgeon
h
as not previous
l
y assesse
d
or counse
l
e
d
.
H
owever tempting it is to un
d
erta
k
e t
h
ese proce
d
ures, eit
h
er
f
or t
h
e privi
l
ege
of
b
ein
g
as
k
e
d
to
d
o so, or
f
or pecuniar
y
a
d
vanta
g
e, un
l
ess t
h
e patient
h
as
b
een proper
l
y examine
d
an
d
counse
l
e
d
, it is an unwise practice.
Aud
i
t
L
aparoscopic sur
g
er
y
g
enerall
y
, and for endometriosis in particular, has
developed without any formal assessment of effi
cacy or safety, in either the
s
hort or lon
g
term. There is little in the wa
y
of formal assessment of s
y
mp
-
t
omatolo
gy
, s
y
mptom relief followin
g
sur
g
ical intervention, or the morbidit
y
a
ssociated with such intervention. The recordin
g
of ph
y
sical si
g
ns either
d
urin
g
clinical assessment or at laparoscop
y
is poor. The recordin
g
s
y
stems
t
hat do exist, e.
g
., the r-AFS score, now the r-ASRM score, a scorin
g
s
y
stem
d
evised b
y
the American Fertilit
y
Societ
y
, are associated more with evaluatin
g
t
he effects of the disease on fertilit
y
than with pain and discomfort.
T
he conduct of randomized clinical trials in sur
g
er
y
g
enerall
y
, and endo
-
metriosis surgery specifi
cally, is very diffi
cult to undertake because of the large
number of variables involved and the diffi
culty of persuading a patient to
u
nder
g
o a sham procedure, even if this was ethicall
y
advisable. Inevitabl
y
, the
o
nl
y
wa
y
of assessin
g
the value of this sur
g
er
y
will be in the audit of patient
s
eries. This requires the careful documentation of s
y
mptoms, ph
y
sical si
g
ns,
surgical fi
ndings, treatment, morbidity, and subsequent change over time of
sy
mptoms and si
g
ns. A vast amount of data captured durin
g
interactions with
p
atients requires such detailed documentation and recordin
g
that a computer-
i
zed database with a core data set is the onl
y
wa
y
of assessin
g
this information
p
roperl
y
. Such databases now exist commerciall
y
or can be easil
y
developed
u
sin
g
simple database software
.
Individual core data sets can then be held centrally so that the effi
cacy and
t
he morbidit
y
of various procedures ma
y
be assessed, with the
g
reater accu
-
r
ac
y
and predictabilit
y
of lar
g
e numbers. It is onl
y
with this sort of data that
p
ro
p
er assessment wou
ld
b
e
p
ossi
bl
e.
Aud
i
t Result
s
T
he author’s personal data series of sur
g
er
y
for severe rectova
g
inal endo
-
m
etriosis associated with either
p
artial or com
p
lete obliteration of the cul de
s
ac over a 2-
y
ear period is shown cumulativel
y
in Table 4.1 and Fi
g
ure 4.3. The
https://t.me/med1917
4. Complications of Laparoscopic Surger
y
for Endometriosis 3
9
T
ab
le 4
.
1
.
Author’s Data for Severe Rectova
g
inal Endometriosis with Cul de Sac
Ob
liter
a
ti
o
n
Januar
y
Januar
y
Januar
y
Januar
y
Januar
y
Januar
y
Januar
y
2
000
– 2
000
– 2
000
– 2
000
– 2
000
– 2
000
– 2
000–
April Au
g
ust December April Au
g
ust December Apri
l
2
000
2
000
2
000
2
00
1 2
00
1 2
00
1 2
00
2
T
o
t
a
l
6
24 42 4
9
59
7
0
82
c
ases
% comp
l
ete 67 63 67 67 64 69 7
1
o
bl
iteration
%
h
emorr
h
age 0 4 5 4 3 6
6
>
500 m
L
%
seromuscular 0 0 5 4 3 3
5
rectal repair
%
full-thickness 0 4 12 10 8 10 1
0
rectal re
p
air
% ureter
i
c 0 4 2 2 2 1
1
d
amage
12
0
1
00
80
60
o. o
f
Case
s
ercenta
g
e
40
20
0
14.00
%
12.00
%
10.00
%
8.00
%
6.00
%
4
.00
%
2
.00
%
0.00
%
01
/
0-04
/
00 01
/
00-80
/
00 01
/
00-12
/
00 01
/
00-04
/
01 01
/
00-08
/
0
1
T
imelin
e
01
/
00-12
/
01 01
/
00-04
/
02 01
/
00-09
/
02
Total Cases % Full-Thickess Rectal Repair
Figure 4.3
.
Cumulative number of patients with severe rectovaginal endometriosis associ
-
a
te
d
with
ob
liter
a
ti
o
n
o
f the c
u
l
d
e s
a
c
.
https://t.me/med1917
4
0 J.T. Wri
g
ht
n
um
b
er o
f
patients requirin
g
eit
h
er a seromuscu
l
ar or
f
u
ll
-t
h
ic
k
ness recta
l
repair rapidly becomes constant, as does the incidence of signifi
ca
n
t
h
emorr
h
a
g
e (Fi
g
ure 4.4). Increase
d
experience re
d
uces t
h
e ris
k
o
f
ureteric
d
ama
g
e.
D
espite t
h
ese cases in w
h
ic
h
t
h
e posterior cu
l
d
e sac is comp
l
ete
ly
o
bliterated and thus the anatomical distortion
g
reater, increased experience
all
ows a
g
reater c
h
ance o
f
success
f
u
lly
d
issectin
g
t
h
e recta
l
muscu
l
aris awa
y
f
r
o
m
the
m
ucosa
a
n
d
thus
a
r
educt
i
o
n in
the
n
eed
fo
r
a
full
-
th
i
ck
n
ess
r
ectal
r
e
p
a
i
r.
Al
t
h
ou
gh
t
h
ere is an un
d
erstan
d
in
g
by
t
h
ose w
h
o
h
an
dl
e a
l
ar
g
e num
b
er
of
cases
of
se
v
e
r
e
e
n
do
m
et
ri
os
i
s
that
the
l
i
kel
i
hood
of
r
ectal
inv
ol
v
e
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
a
l
imite
d
recta
l
resection is
h
ig
h
in t
h
is
d
isease,
f
or t
h
e vast majority o
f
gyne-
c
o
l
ogists an
d
ot
h
er
h
ea
l
t
h
pro
f
essiona
l
s, a recta
l
repair wi
ll
usua
ll
y
b
e regar
d
e
d
a
s a critica
l
inci
d
ent invo
l
vin
g
t
h
e pro
d
uction o
f
inci
d
ent reports an
d
an asso
-
c
iate
d
, possi
bly
h
osti
l
e au
d
it, o
f
ten
b
ase
d
on an incomp
l
ete un
d
erstan
d
in
g
o
f
th
e
d
isease, t
h
e sur
g
er
y
, an
d
t
h
e
l
on
g
-term outcome, an
d
ma
y
resu
l
t in a
d
verse
c
riticism o
f
t
h
e sur
g
eon’s wor
k
. A
d
verse-inci
d
ent reports are not usua
lly
mea
-
s
ure
d
a
g
ainst a
d
enominator, an
d
persona
l
au
d
it series wi
ll
g
o a
l
on
g
wa
y
to
p
rotectin
g
onese
lf
a
g
ainst suc
h
criticisms.
As series grow, surgical risks with 90% confi
d
ence interva
l
s (CIs) can
b
e
g
enerate
d
, as is s
h
own in Box 4.1, an
d
pre
d
ictive
f
actors accurate
l
y assesse
d
.
Th
is wi
ll
b
ot
h
improve an
d
g
ive an actuaria
l
b
ase to patient counse
l
in
g
.
Th
e pre
d
ictive
f
actors
f
or
f
u
ll
-t
h
ic
k
ness recta
l
invo
l
vement o
f
en
d
ometriosis
a
re s
h
own in Box 4.2.
2
0
80
60
No. o
f
Cases
Percenta
g
e
40
2
0
0
7
.00
%
6
.00
%
5
.00
%
4
.00
%
3.00
%
2.00
%
1.00
%
0
.00
%
0
1
/
0-04
/
00 01
/
00-80
/
00 01
/
00-12
/
00 01
/
00-04
/
01 01
/
00-08
/
0
1
Tim
e
lin
e
01
/
00-12
/
01 01
/
00-04
/
02 01
/
00-09
/
02
Total Cases % Hemorrha
g
e > 500 mL
ure 4.4
.
Cumulative number o
f
patients with severe rectova
g
inal endometriosis and
ercent with si
g
ni
f
icant perioperative hemorrha
g
e
.
https://t.me/med1917
4. Complications of Laparoscopic Surger
y
for Endometriosis 4
1
I
n a
ll
b
ranc
h
es o
f
surgery, innovation
h
as
b
een associate
d
wit
h
an initia
l
increase in mor
b
i
d
ity, an
d
in
d
ee
d
morta
l
ity,
b
e
f
ore
b
ecoming t
h
e accepte
d
met
h
o
d
o
f
treatment. Goo
d
examp
l
es o
f
t
h
is progression are
l
aparoscopic
c
h
o
l
ecystectomy an
d
h
eart transp
l
antation. To overcome initia
l
preju
d
ice or
indeed to properly assess the effi
cacy and safety of any surgical technique,
meticu
l
ous au
d
it com
b
ine
d
wit
h
care
f
u
l
an
d
measura
bl
e tec
h
niques are t
h
e
on
l
y met
h
o
d
s o
f
assessment. W
h
ere possi
bl
e an
d
et
h
ica
l
, o
f
course, t
h
ese
met
h
o
d
s s
h
ou
ld
b
e associate
d
wit
h
ran
d
omize
d
c
l
inica
l
tria
l
s, w
h
ic
h
are now
un
d
er way. Surgica
l
treatment o
f
en
d
ometriosis current
l
y remains t
h
e on
l
y
e
ff
ective treatment,
b
ut on
l
y a
f
ew centers are a
bl
e an
d
wi
ll
ing to carry out
t
h
ese proce
d
ures. A
d
equate training met
h
o
d
s wou
ld
l
ea
d
to an increase in t
h
e
num
b
er o
f
centers a
bl
e to provi
d
e t
h
is surgery
.
E
xperience, training, an
d
au
d
it remain t
h
e cornerstones o
f
a
d
equate
t
h
erapy an
d
are strong
l
y recommen
d
e
d.
eferen
c
e
s
1. Ka
l
u G, Wrig
h
t JY. Laparoscopic surgery an
d
t
h
e
l
aw.
stetrician & G
y
naeco
l
ogist.
2001;3
:
1
4
1
.
Box 4.2 Symptoms and S
i
gns Pred
i
ct
i
ve of Severe
Rectovag
i
nal Endometr
i
os
is
D
y
schezia throu
g
hout mont
h
Va
g
inal epithelial involvement
N
odule
4
cm
Rectal fi
xity
Box 4.
1
Hemorr
h
a
g
e 6% (95% CI 2–13
)
Seromuscular re
p
air 6% (95% CI 2–13
)
Mucosa
l
repair 9% (95% CI 5–16
)
Rectovaginal fi
stula 1%
(
95% CI 0.2–6 NS*
)
Ureteric fi
stula 1% (95% CI NS)
*NS, not signifi
can
t
https://t.me/med1917
4
2 J.T. Wri
g
ht
2
. Redwine DB, Wri
g
ht JT. Laparoscopic treatment of complete obliteration of the cul
-
d
e-sac associate
d
wit
h
en
d
ometriosis:
l
on
g
-term
f
o
ll
ow-up o
f
en
bl
oc resection.
F
erti
l
S
teri
l
. 2001;76:358–365
.
3. Kretz JM, Re
d
wine DB, O
l
ive DL. Data
b
ase management on a persona
l
computer.
J
Am Assoc G
y
neco
l
Laparosc.
7
;
4:
28
5–
289
.
v
https://t.me/med1917