Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_2915_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
15.09.2026
Размер:
12 Мб
Скачать
☆
Hodgkin’s Lymphoma
221
Stage
description
I
Involvement of a single lymph node regions (I) or single extralymphatic organ or site in the absence of any lymph node involvement (IE)
II
Involvement of two or more lymph node regions on the same side of the diaphragm (the mediastinum is considered as a single site, whereas hilar lymph nodes are lateralized). The number of anatomic sites should be indicated by a subscript (e.g., II3)D.
III
Involvement of lymph node regions or structures on both sides of the diaphragm
III1 With involvement of splenic hilar, celiac, or portal nodes III2 With involvement of para-aortic, iliac, and mesenteric nodes
IV
Involvement of one or more extranodal sites in addition to a site for which
the designation “E” has been used
Factor
EORTC
GHSG
NCIC
Stanford
Mediastinum
MM >35% of TD at T5/6 on PA CXR
MMW/MTD ≥ 1/3 on PA CXR
MMW/MTD >1/3 on PA CXR
MM >10 cm OR MMW/MTD >1/3 on PA CXR
ESR/ “B” symptoms
ESR ≥30 w/“B” symptoms ESR ≥50 w/o “B” symptoms
ESR ≥30 w/“B” symptoms ESR ≥50 w/o “B” symptoms
ESR ≥50 or
“B” symptoms
“B” symptoms
Nodal sites
≥4 Sites
≥3 Sites
≥4 Sites
Others
Age ≥50
Extranodal site
Age ≥40 or MCHL/LDHL
Risk factor
No. of risk factor
Freedom from progression at 5 years (%)
Serum albumin <40 g/l
0
84%
Hemoglobin <10.5 g/l
1
77%
Male gender
2
67%
Age ≥45 years
3
60%
Stage IV disease
4
51%
White blood cell count ≥15 × 109/l Lymphocytopenia <0.6 × 109/l
≥5
42%
Table 3. The modified Cotswolds staging system for Hodgkin’s lymphoma
Reference
Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC et al (eds) (2009) AJCC (American Joint Committee on
Cancer) cancer staging manual, 7th edn. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York; Tsang
R, Connors J.
8. Prognostic Factors
For stages I and II patients, prognostic factors are listed in Table-xx. There are different combinations of these factors, resulting in different definitions on favorable and unfavorable prognostic for early stage HL (table-4 and 5).
Table 4. Different definitons of favorable and unfavorable prognostic
Table 5. International Prognostic Score (IPS) for advanced HD
Gustavo Arruda Viani
222
Study
Question
Description
EORTC H6U
ABVD or MOPP?
Randomized 316 patients with unfavorable prognosis, early stage HL
who did not undergo laparotomy were randomly to mantle irradiation and either ABVD or MOPP.
At 10 years, ABVD was associated with a significantly higher
freedom from progression (90 versus 68 %).
German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG) HD7 trial
E-RT with or without CT?
Randomized 643 favorable prognosis patients with CS IA-IIB HL
were randomized to receive subtotal nodal and splenic irradiation with or without two courses of ABVD.
There was a significantly improved 7-year freedom from treatment
failure in the radiation therapy and chemotherapy arm (88%) versus radiation therapy alone (67 %). No survival differences were seen.
SWOG study
E-RT with or without CT?
Randomized 348 patients with favorable prognosis CS IA-IIA to
receive either subtotal lymphoid irradiation (STLI: sequential mantle and periaortic/splenic fields) alone or combined modality treatment (CMT) with three courses of AV (doxorubicin, vinblastine) followed by STLI.
There is a superior 3-y failure-free survival for patients on the CMT
arm (94%) compared with the STLI arm (81 %, p<0.001).
References
Cosset JM, Henry-Amar M, Meerwaldt JH et al. The EORTC trials for limited stage
Hodgkin's disease. The EORTC Lymphoma Cooperative Group. Eur J Cancer.
1992;28A(11):1847. Engert A, Plütschow A, Eich HT et al. Reduced treatment intensity in patients with early-
stage Hodgkin's lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(7):640. Hasenclever, D, Diehl, V. A prognostic score for advanced Hodgkin's disease. International
Prognostic Factors Project on Advanced Hodgkin's Disease. N Engl J Med 1998;
339:1506.
9. Treatment
• In the last decades the treatment of HL has evolved from extended-field radiation
alone as the main therapy to a combined-modality approach with chemotherapy and radiation, or chemotherapy alone (table 6).
• ABVD containing multidrug regimen(s) is the treatment of choice for HL. Multidrug
chemotherapy is superior to single drug regimens, and ABVD-containing regimens produce improved disease-free survival as compared to MOPP alone (Table-6).
• Furthermore, ABVD has acute toxicity (hematological toxicity), but more long term
adverse affects (pulmonary and cardiac toxicity). Brief and dose-intense chemotherapy regimens (Stanford V regimen) plus radiation therapy to bulky disease sites for locally extensive and advanced- stage Hodgkin’s disease have produced acceptable outcomes (table 6).
Table 6. Clinical evidence for Hodgkin’s disease
Hodgkin’s Lymphoma
223
Study
Question
Description
EORTC H9-F
CT or CT plus RT
771 favorable prognosis CS I-II patients were treated with 6 cycles of
the EBVP.
Patients who achieve a complete remission or complete remission
undetermined after chemotherapy were randomly assigned to receive 36 Gy involved field irradiation versus 20 Gy involved field irradiation versus no radiation therapy.
At the most recent interim analysis, the chemotherapy alone arm was
closed, due to a higher than expected number of relapses that met stopping rules.
Grupo Argentino de Tratamiento de la Leucemia Aguda (GATLA)
CT or CT plus RT
277 patients with CS I-II Hodgkin’s lymphoma were randomized to
receive either 6 cycles of cyclophosphamide, vinblastine, procarbazine, and prednisone (CVPP) followed by involved-field radiation therapy to 30 Gy, or not.
At 84 months, disease-free survival (DFS) for the combined modality
therapy arm was significantly longer than that of the chemotherapy alone arm (71 versus 62 %).
Tata Memorial Hospital
CT or CT plus RT
Randomized complete responders after six cycles of ABVD to receive
either involved-field radiation therapy or no further treatment.
Patients of all stages were included; 55 % had CS I-II disease.
Significant differences in six-year event-free survival (88 versus 76 %) and overall survival (100 versus 89%) were observed, favoring the combined modality therapy arm.
References
Carde P, Hagenbeek A, Hayat M et al. Clinical staging versus laparotomy and combined
modality with MOPP versus ABVD in early-stage Hodgkin's disease: the H6 twin
randomized trials from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer
Lymphoma Cooperative Group. J Clin Oncol. 1993;11(11):2258. Engert A, Franklin J, Eich HT et al. Two cycles of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and
dacarbazine plus extended-field radiotherapy is superior to radiotherapy alone in early
favorable Hodgkin's lymphoma: final results of the GHSG HD7 trial. J Clin Oncol.
2007;25(23):3495. Press OW, LeBlanc M, Lichter AS et al. Phase III randomized intergroup trial of subtotal
lymphoid irradiation versus doxorubicin, vinblastine, and subtotal lymphoid irradiation
for stage IA to IIA Hodgkin's disease. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19(22):4238.
• BEACOPP is an option for unfavorable or advanced presentations. Radiation is the
single most effective therapeutic agent in controlling locoregional HL. Radiation fields should be based on anatomical structures and the extent of the tumor.
• Once the diagnosis of Hodgkin’s lymphoma has been established, subsequent
treatment is based upon stratification into favorable and unfavorable prognosis disease based upon the presence or absence of certain clinical features, such as age, B symptoms, and large mediastinal adenopathy and clinical stage.
• For most patients with early stage favorable prognosis Hodgkin’s lymphoma, the
combination chemotherapy plus involved-field radiation therapy is recommended. In this scenario, ABVD chemotherapy in combination with involved-field radiotherapy is the standard treatment for patients with favorable prognosis stage I-II Hodgkin’s lymphoma (table – 7).
Table 7. Clinical evidence for combined treatment
Gustavo Arruda Viani
224
Study
Question
Description
EORTC H8F trial
Involved or extended field RT?
Randomized 542 patients with favorable prognosis CS IA-IIA Hodgkin’s
lymphoma to either three cycles of MOPP/ABV hybrid plus involved field irradiation or subtotal nodal radiotherapy (mantle and paraaortic­splenic irradiation).
The combination therapy arm had significantly superior five-year relapse-
free survival (99 versus 78%), and superior 10-year overall survival (97 versus 92 %). Both arms had similar response rates and cumulative risk for second cancers.
German Hodgkin Study Group HD10 Trial
2 ABVD or 4 ABVD? 20 Gy or 30 Gy RT?
Randomized 1370 patients to receive one of the following four
treatments: two cycles of ABVD followed by 30 Gy involved field radiation therapy; two cycles of ABVD followed by 20 Gy involved field radiation therapy; four cycles of ABVD followed by 30 Gy involved field radiation therapy; or four cycles of ABVD followed by 20 Gy involved field radiation therapy.
At median follow-up of 7.5 years, there was no significant difference
between four and two cycles of ABVD chemotherapy in five-year overall survival (97.1 versus 96.6 %), freedom from treatment failure (93.0 versus 91.1 %), and progression-free survival (93.5 versus 91.2 %).
References
Thomas J, Ferme C, Noordijk EM, et al. EORTC lymphoma group; groupe d’études des
lymphomes adultes (GELA). Results of the EORTC-GELA H9 randomized trials: The
H9-F trial (comparing 3 radiation dose levels) and H9-U trial (comparing 3 chemotherapy
schemes) in patients with favorable or unfavorable early stage Hodgkin’s lymphoma
(HL). Haematologica 2007;92(s5):27. Pavlovsky S, Maschio M, Santarelli MT et al. Randomized trial of chemotherapy versus
chemotherapy plus radiotherapy for stage I-II Hodgkin's disease. J Natl Cancer Inst.
1988;80(18):1466.
• The treatment with reduced intensity delivering two cycles of ABVD followed by 20
Gy involved-field radiation therapy may be sufficient treatment for patients with favorable presentations of stage I-II Hodgkin’s lymphoma, according to definition from the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG).
• For patients with favorable risk early stage disease that don`t have enrollment criteria
for the GHSG study (eg, those with three sites of disease). Three to four cycles of ABVD followed by 30 Gy involved field radiation therapy (table – 8).
Table 8. Clinical evidence for radiotherapy field, radiotherapy dose and chemotherapy
cycles in favorable HD
References
Ferme C, Eghbali H, Meerwaldt JH, et al. Chemotherapy plus involved-field radiation in
early stage Hodgkin’s disease. N Engl J Med 2007;357(19):1916–1927. Engert A, Plütschow A, Eich HT et al. Reduced treatment intensity in patients with early-
stage Hodgkin's lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(7):640.
Hodgkin’s Lymphoma
225
Study
Question
Description
The German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG) HD11
ABVD or BEACOPP? 20 or 30 Gy RT?
Randomized 1395 patients with unfavorable prognosis early-
stage HL to receive one of the following four treatments. Four cycles of ABVD followed by 30 Gy involved field radiation therapy. Four cycles of ABVD followed by 20 Gy involved field radiation therapy. Four cycles of baseline BEACOPP followed by 30 Gy involved field radiation therapy. Four cycles of baseline BEACOPP followed by 20 Gy involved field radiation therapy.
At a median follow-up of 7.5 years, overall survival was
similar in all four treatment arms. Treatment with four cycles of ABVD followed by 30 Gy of involved field radiation therapy resulted in similar rates of progression-free survival and freedom from treatment failure when compared with either escalated BEACOPP strategy.
Patients who received baseline BEACOPP had significantly
higher rates of severe toxicity.
EORTC H8U
4 or 6 cycles? I-RT or E-RT?
Compared the hybrid MOPP/ABV regimen for four versus six
cycles and the radiation field size for involved versus extended fields in 996 patients with unfavorable prognosis early stage HL.
At 10 years of follow-up, there were no differences in failure-
free or overall survival. Estimated five-year event-free survival rates were approximately 87 % and 10-year overall survival estimates were approximately 86 %.
EORTC H9U trial
4 ABVD, 6 ABVD or 4 BECCOP?
The randomly assigned patients with unfavorable prognosis
stage I-II HL to receive one of three treatments: six cycles of ABVD, four cycles of ABVD, or four cycles of BEACOPP followed by 30 Gy involved-field radiation in all arms.
Preliminary results show similar four-year event-free and
overall survival in all three arms, but increased toxicity with BEACOPP.
• For most patients with early stage unfavorable prognosis Hodgkin’s lymphoma,
chemotherapy can be given until maximal tumor response, as evaluated by computed tomography scan and positron emission tomography imaging, after at least two cycles of chemotherapy. After these cicles, chemotherapy is followed by involved field radiation therapy. The progress of clinical trials to identify the best chemotherapy combination for these patients occured with early studies compared MOPP with MOPP-like combinations, later trials compared MOPP or MOPP-like combinations with ABVD in an attempt to both enhance efficacy and reduce toxicity by limiting exposure to alkylating agentes and the most recent trials compared ABVD with more intense chemotherapy combinations such as escalated BEACOPP. Currently, after all these trials ABVD combination remains as standard chemo­therapy regimen.
• In patients without bulky disease, radiation doses of 30 Gy appear to be adequate.
Currently, bulky disease is still treated with total doses de 30 to 36 Gy (table 9).
Table 9. Clinical evidence for radiotherapy dose and chhemotherapy combinations
Gustavo Arruda Viani
226
Study
Description
meta­analysis
Included four randomized trials with a total of 2868 adult patients with newly diagnosed
advanced stage or unfavorable early stage HL.
BEACOPP resulted in significantly longer progression-free survival (hazard ratio 0.53;
95% CI 0.44-0.64), but no different in overall survival (hazard ratio 0.80; 95% CI 0.59-
1.09).
BEACOPP was associated with significantly more severe hematologic toxicity,
infections, and occurrence of myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia.
Dana­Farber Cancer Institute
Randomized 361 patients with advanced HL or relapse after initial radiotherapy to treat
with either 6 to 8 cycles of MOPP, 6 to 8 cycles of ABVD, or 12 cycles of MOPP alternating with ABVD.
MOPP alternating with ABVD was as effective but more toxic than ABVD alone.
When compared with those who were assigned to MOPP, patients assigned to ABVD demonstrated a higher rate of initial complete response (82 versus 67 %).
EORTC
Randomized 333 patients to consolidation RT or observation after the achievement of a
CR with a MOPP/ABV hybrid regimen.
When compared with patients who received RT, patients who did not receive RT had
similar rates of event-free survival (77 versus 73 %) and overall survival (85 versus 78 %) at eight years.
References
Eich HT, Diehl V, Görgen H, Pabst T et al. Intensified chemotherapy and dose-reduced
involved-field radiotherapy in patients with early unfavorable Hodgkin's lymphoma: final
analysis of the German Hodgkin Study Group HD11 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28
(27):4199. FerméC, Eghbali H, Meerwaldt JH et al. Chemotherapy plus involved-field radiation in early-
stage Hodgkin's disease. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(19):1916. Noordijk, E.M., Thomas, J., Foerme, M.B, et al. First results of the EORTC-GELA H9
randomized trials: the H9-F trial (comparing 3 radiation dose levels) and H9-U trial
(comparing 3 chemotherapy schemes) in patients with favorable or unfavorable early
stage Hodgkin's lymphoma (abstract). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2005; 16:6505.
• Patients with advanced stage HL, chemotherapy based on ABVD is the preferred
choice. Alternative options include escalated BEACOPP and Stanford V. Although escalated BEACOPP programs have shown advantages in freedom from progression, its toxicities can make it inappropriate for some populations.
• The role of consolidation radiotherapy (RT) after chemotherapy induction for
advanced stage HL is controversial. RT appears to improve freedom from pro­gression but not overall survival. Its use depends primarily upon the initial chemotherapy administered and the patient's response to that chemotherapy.
• Patients with initial bulky mediastinal disease (>10 cm or >1/3 the chest diameter)
and/or the presence of residual abnormalities on imaging studies after completion of chemotherapy (ie, partial response, PR) should recceive RT after ABVD.
• RT can be not beneficial in patients without initially bulky disease who achieve a
complete remission (CR) with ABVD (table 10).
Table 10. Clinical evidence for radiotherapy in advanced HL
Hodgkin’s Lymphoma
227
References
Bauer K, Skoetz N, Monsef I, Engert A, Brillant C. Comparison of chemotherapy including
escalated BEACOPP versus chemotherapy including ABVD for patients with early
unfavourable or advanced stage Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.
2011.
Canellos GP, Anderson JR, Propert KJ et al. A Chemotherapy of advanced Hodgkin's disease
with MOPP, ABVD, or MOPP alternating with ABVD. N Engl J Med. 1992;327
(21):1478. Aleman BM, Raemaekers JM, TomiŝiĉR et al. Involved-field radiotherapy for patients in
partial remission after chemotherapy for advanced Hodgkin's lymphoma. European
Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Lymphoma Group. Int J
Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;67(1):19.
10. Radiotherapy Techniques
To reduce toxicity to normal adjacent organs, and optimise dose distribution for the target volume, CT planning should be used. Thus, CT scans of 3 mm slice thickness are taken using intravenous contrast to aid delineation of lymph nodes adjacent to vascular structures. PET­CT and CT scans taken in the treatment position before chemotherapy are co-registered with the post-chemotherapy CT planning scans for target volume delineation. (figure 3).
Figure 3. CT simulator for radiotherapy planning.
Patients are scanned lying supine with appropriate immobilisation devices for the anatomical site to be treated, with a system of skin tattoos. For axillary radiotherapy, the arm is abducted and supported using an arm pole or other restraint. For cervical nodal irradiation, a thermoplastic or vacuum shell is used with reference points on the shell for alignment with lasers (figure 4).
Gustavo Arruda Viani
228
Figure 4. Immobilisation mask for a mantle field planning.
As lymphomas occur at several anatomical sites, the scan should include the whole volume of critical organs such as lung, liver, and kidneys for DVH assessment. Traditionally, wide or extended field radiotherapy treatments called as ‘Mantle’ and ‘Inverted Y’ were used as primary treatment for lymphomas with satisfactory cure rates but with a high rate of late toxicity, mainly, to the heart, lungs and breasts (figure-5).
Figure 5. Mantle field design for radiotherapy treatment.
With multimodality treatment combining chemotherapy and adjuvant radiotherapy, evidences have supported the use of local radiotherapy instead of extended fields, to reduce
Hodgkin’s Lymphoma
229
toxicity. There are three possible approaches to using smaller volume treatments. Since lymphatic spread involves nodes adjacent to the primary site of disease first, locoregional treatment that includes elective adjuvant irradiation of the first node stations may be given (IFRT). The CTV includes the GTV, which is the primary site, and adjacent nodes as CTV (a situation analogous to treatment of uninvolved nodes in head and neck cancer). Alternatively, only the initial macroscopic volume of disease (GTV), whether in lymph node (involved nodal INRT), or an organ (sometimes called involved site ISRT) is treated with a GTV-CTV margin. Finally, the residual GTV following chemotherapy, defined by PET-CT, could be the basis of the target volume. In published reports the target volumes used may combine aspects of these different conceptual approaches. When primary radiotherapy without chemotherapy is given (e.g. stage I follicular non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma or nodular lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin’s lymphoma), IFRT is used to include the uninvolved first node station in the CTV as well as the macroscopically involved GTV. The CTV is designed using the initial volume of involved lymph nodes, i.e. the initial GTV as shown on staging CT, MRI and FDG-PET­CT scans. These scans need to be taken in the radiotherapy treatment position, whenever possible, for accurate co-registration with subsequent CT planning scans which are taken after chemotherapy. When primary radiotherapy is given, the GTV is present both clinically and on imaging. After chemotherapy there may be a complete response (PET and CT negative) with no GTV, or a partial response with a residual GTV. The original GTV is outlined on the post­chemotherapy CT planning scan using the co-registered initial CT and PET scans. The patient’s anatomy will have altered with response to chemotherapy, and the principle is to cover the site of original disease, but to reduce toxicity by excluding wherever possible normal tissues that were displaced, but not involved by tumour. Anatomical planes act as boundaries and the volume should not extend into adjacent bone, air or viscera. For both IFRT and INRT of the mediastinum, the pre-chemotherapy volume is used for the superior– inferior extension and the post-chemotherapy volume for the axial to reduce dose to blood vessels, heart, coronary arteries and lung which may have returned to their normal position (Figure 6).
Figure 6. Mantle, Involved field and involved nodal field limits for HL.
Gustavo Arruda Viani
230
Where there was definite tumour infiltration into adjacent tissues at diagnosis, the whole volume should still be included. The CTV for IFRT includes the clinically and radiologically involved lymph nodes as imaged at presentation (GTV) with the adjacent lymphatics and uninvolved first node station. For definitive radiation therapy for HL, a total dose of 36–44 Gy can be used to the involved region of disease. The uninvolved region should be treated to 30–36 Gy. For adjuvant radiation therapy following definitive multi-drug chemotherapy, 30– 36 Gy is recommended for bulky disease (stage I–IV), and 20–30 Gy is recommended for non-bulky diseases (stage I–IV). A total of 30 Gy can be recommended for excised NLPHL. Fraction size of 1.5–2.0 Gy per daily fraction is usually used.
Conclusion
• For patients with early-stage disease, the standard approach is a combined modality
with short-course chemotherapy, followed by low-dose radiation targeting involved lymph node region(s).
• In patients with advanced-stage disease, chemotherapy is the main modality. . When
a complete response is obtained with ABVD chemotherapy or its equivalent, there is no role for consolidation radiation therapy.
• Different radiation fields have been used in Hodgkin’s lymphoma and involved-fi eld
radiation therapy (IFRT) is the current standard. It covers involved lymph nodes before chemotherapy and the nodal region in which the involved lymph node(s) is/are located.