Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3835_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
15.09.2026
Размер:
13 Мб
Скачать
☆
Chapter 9
https://t.me/medicina_free
Acoustic Radiation Force Optical Coherence Elastography
Yueqiao Qu, Youmin He, Teng Ma, Qifa Zhou and Zhongping Chen
Introduction
Mechanical properties, such as the elasticity and viscosity, are often major indicators of diseases. The stiffness of tissue changes in unison with the onset of pathology in the cases of cardiovascular diseases, ocular diseases, and tumor formations. The cellular composition of the tissues is altered over time, in tune with disease progression. However, the reported stiffness of a specific type of cell or tissue differs greatly depending on the type of imaging modality used and the experimental conditions. In order to accurately distinguish the diseased tissues from healthy ones, it is necessary to validate the results through both theoretical and experimental methods.
Y. Q u · Y. H e · Z. Chen (B) Department of Biomedical Engineering, Beckman Laser Institute, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697, USA e-mail: z2chen@uci.edu
Y. Q u e-mail: rachelyqu@gmail.com
Y. H e e-mail: youminh1@uci.edu
T. M a Paul C. Lauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Institute of Biomedical and Health Engineering, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen 518055, China e-mail: teng.ma@siat.ac.cn
Q. Zhou Roski Eye Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA e-mail: qifazhou@usc.edu
Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA
© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020 Q. Zhou and Z. Chen (eds.), Multimodality Imaging,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981- 10-6307-7_9
207
208 Y. Qu et al.
https://t.me/medicina_free
Cardiovascular diseases have the highest rate of fatalities and account for 30.8% of all deaths in the USA (Mozaffarian et al. 2016; Dariush et al. 2016). Atherosclerosis, accounting for 41 deaths per day, is a cardiovascular condition that is associated with changes in the composition of the blood vessel walls. During the early onset of disease, the walls of the artery thicken due to fatty deposits, inflammation, cells, and scar tissue build up (Ross 1999; Hansson 2005). Eventually, the lesions that form, called plaques, are composed of distinctive necrotic cores and a fibrous cap. If the plaque is stable with a relatively thick cap and small lipid core, there may be varying degrees of obstruction to blood flow. However, in the case of a vulnerable plaque, the cap, containing collagen and smooth muscle cells, becomes less than 65 µmin thickness and can rupture easily. When there is a plaque rupture, the inflammatory elements of the necrotic core burst into the artery and can cause blocked arterial flow, angina, or even myocardial infarction (Virmani et al. 2003; Cheruvu et al. 2007).
Early detection of vulnerable plaques is essential to the health and safety of car­diovascular patients. The structure and composition of t he plaque are largely used currently to determine its vulnerability. Current clinical imaging techniques include angiography, angioscopy, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (Amir­bekian 2007; Waxman et al. 2006). Angiography allows the physician to visualize the region of blockage, by inserting a dye into the bloodstream and observing the mechanisms of flow (Little et al. 1988). Angioscopy helps to examine the surface of the interior blood vessel to identify areas of damage and abnormality (Sherman et al.
1986; Takano et al. 2001). Ultrasound and MRI allow for visualization through the
depth of the blood vessel walls, at the expense of resolution and cost, respectively (LaMuraglia et al. 1996). Due to these limitations, current imaging modalities cannot effectively identify vulnerable plaques with high sensitivity and specificity (Amir­bekian 2007; Waxman et al. 2006). Since the change in the composition of the blood vessel wall is indicative of the early onset of atherosclerosis, it is possible to classify vulnerability according to the composition. Plaques can be differentiated into three different types based on their composition: lipid, fibrous, and calcified. The mechan­ical stiffness of these three components differs by nearly one order of magnitude (Ebenstein et al. 2009; Inagaki et al. 2006; Baldewsing et al. 2005). Therefore, if the stiffness of the tissue can be measured, the composition can be determined, and vulnerable plaques can be isolated.
Mechanical testing methods have been used to observe the differences in the stiff­ness of lipid, fibrous, and calcified plaque components (Loree et al. 1994; Chai et al.
2014; Walsh et al. 2014). However, these tests require extraction and manipulation
of the tissue, which is not possible for in vivo imaging. It is necessary to understand the change in tissue elasticity in vivo during the early onset and formation of plaques in order to accurately assess the mechanical properties under the influence of natu­ral environmental factors (Takano et al. 2001; Ebenstein et al. 2009; Inagaki et al.
2006; Baldewsing et al. 2006). The feasibility of such measurements is limited by
the resolution and accuracy of the measurement device, size of the device, and the accessibility of the plaque in question.
Tissue elastography is a method that has been developed to map out the mechanical properties of tissues (Schaar et al. 2003; Ophir et al. 1991). There are typically
9 Acoustic Radiation Force Optical Coherence Elastography 209
https://t.me/medicina_free
Table 9.1 Elastography in three steps
Excitation Detection Parameter estimation
Internal External Mechanical test
Static Dynamic
Magnetic resonance Ultrasound Optical
Quantitative Qualitative
three steps involved as depicted in Table 9.1: excitation, detection, and parameter estimation (Sun et al. 2011; Manduca et al. 2001; Greenleaf et al. 2003). The tissue is first excited using an internal or external mechanism, where the tissue itself or an outside force causes deformation (Greenleaf et al. 2003). The force can be either static or dynamic in nature, depending on the variable to be measured. For example, a few external methods include piezoelectric elements, air puff devices, and acoustic radiation force (ARF) using ultrasound. All of these devices operate by giving a static, continuing force to analyze a stable deformation state, or by providing a single or modulated dynamic signal of pulses to analyze the change in deformation over time. Once the tissue is deformed, a technique is used to visualize and measure the amount of deformation. Traditionally, mechanical testing using pressure sensors was implemented to obtain data in ex vivo samples. Magnetic resonance and ultrasound methods have also been used to detect tissue deformation at the expense of high cost and low resolution, respectively. In recent years, optical imaging methods, such as optical coherence elastography, have been developed to detect tissue response (Khalil et al. 2005; Wang et al. 2006, 2007;Qietal.2012, 2013, 2014; Zhu et al. 2015;Qu et al. 2016, 2018;Heetal.2019; Kennedy et al. 2015; Liang et al. 2010; Manapuram et al. 2012; Rogowska et al. 2004; van Soest et al. 2007; Wang and Larin 2015). In particular, phase resolved Doppler optical coherence tomography (OCT) has been widely used for detection (Chen et al. 1997a, b; Zhao et al. 2000a, b), with its main advantages being its high resolution and high displacement sensitivity.
Most parameter estimation methods target the extraction of elasticity by the means of elastograms or elasticity maps (Khalil et al. 2005; Wang et al. 2006, 2007;Qietal.
2012, 2014;Quetal.2016, 2018; Kennedy et al. 2015; Liang et al. 2010; Manapuram
et al. 2012; Rogowska et al. 2004; van Soest et al. 2007; Wang and Larin 2015;He et al. 2019). Research has also been done to observe other mechanical properties, such as the viscosity (Sinkus et al. 2005a,
b; Catheline et al. 2004). The parameter
estimation can be either quantitative or qualitative. Qualitative methods allow users to obtain relative values for mechanical properties and can be beneficial for the comparison between healthy and diseased tissues. However, there are often problems with the calibration accuracy of the system as well as environmental and systematic changes between measurements that limit the functions of qualitative data. Due to these factors, quantitative measurements with strong theoretical evidence are always preferred. A few examples of quantification include shear wave velocity calculations, strain imaging, and tissue frequency response (Nightingale et al. 2003; Evans et al.
2010; O’Donnell et al. 1994;Qietal.2012, 2013, 2014; Ahmad et al. 2015; Liang
210 Y. Qu et al.
https://t.me/medicina_free
et al. 2008;Quetal.2018;Heetal.2019). Select methods will be discussed in detail in the next section.
Intravascular elastography using ultrasound has been widely studied in the past 20 years (Takano et al. 2001; de Korte et al. 1998, 2000; Baldewsing et al. 2004a). In general, a pressure is applied to the artery, and ultrasound imaging is used for the detection of tissue displacement, which is then converted to strain measurements and an elastogram can be generated. Examples of ultrasound elastography techniques include compression strain imaging and phase-sensitive speckle tracking methods based on cross-correlation analyses (de Korte et al. 2000). In vivo intravascular ultrasound elastography studies have also taken place in the past years, along with modeling methods such as finite element analysis (de Korte et al. 2002; Baldewsing et al. 2004b, c). However, these methods are often limited by the low ultrasound resolution of typically 150–300 µm, which allows for the detection of homogenous plaque types, but are limited in the observation of heterogeneity within small regions, which is the case for most human plaques (Prati et al. 2001). In addition, most vul­nerable plaques are characterized by thin fibrous caps, as little as 65 µm in thickness, which cannot be accurately measured using ultrasound (Virmani et al. 2003). Using optical methods, with micron-level resolution, it is possible to detect minute changes in tissue elasticity within a small region. Finally, due to the nanometer sensitivity of phase-resolved OCT, only small forces are necessary to induce vibrations, which is critical in in vivo clinical applications.
Compressional and Shear Wave Methods Using OCE
Optical coherence elastography (OCE) is a technology that uses the principles of opti­cal coherence tomography (OCT) to detect the tissue response to excitation (Huang et al. 1991; Fujimoto 2001). OCT is based on the interference of backscattered light signals of the sample and a reference mirror. In regard to OCE, an excitation force, most often external, is applied to the tissue, while the optical interference information is extracted (Sun et al. 2011; Kennedy et al. 2015; Liang et al. 2010; Manapuram et al. 2012; Rogowska et al. 2004; van Soest et al. 2007; Wang and Larin 2015;Qi et al. 2012, 2014;Quetal.2016). In summary, the A-line interference signal, I (z), can be summarized using Eq. 9.1, where its magnitude and phase, denoted by φ(z) at a certain depth z, can be separated. The information provided can be used to measure the tissue response by using certain parameters such as done in the phase-resolved method and Doppler variance methods (Zhao et al. 2000a, b).
I
Interference
(z) =|I
Interference
There are primarily two types of tissue responses, which rely on elastic wave properties, that are studied using OCE: the p-wave and the s-wave (Catheline et al.
1999). When a force is exerted on a sample, the first response consists of the p-wave,
(z)|e
i φ(z)
(9.1)
9 Acoustic Radiation Force Optical Coherence Elastography 211
https://t.me/medicina_free
also known as the compressional wave, traveling across the sample parallel to the direction of the force. The p-wave travels at a high speed and essentially compresses the sample as it passes. The s -wave, also referred to as the secondary or shear wave, travels perpendicularly to the direction of the initial force and is approximately three orders of magnitude slower than the p-wave (Gennisson et al. 2005). The s-wave is directly related to the shear modulus. We will now introduce two different methods of parameter estimation: (1) Doppler OCE using the p-wave measurements to obtain the elastic modulus and (2) velocity extraction using s-waves to obtain the shear modulus.
Doppler OCE
With the extracted phase information shown in Eq. 9.1, the phase shift between 2 A-lines can be calculated. The Doppler frequency shift, f proportional to the axial velocity denoted by v
cos θ and the measured phase shift,
r
φ(z),asshowninEq.9.2 (Chen et al. 1997a, b; Zhao et al. 2000a, b):
n cos θ
2v
r
=
f
D
λ
0
φ(x, z, t
=
2πt
, is by definition directly
D
)
(9.2)
The variable n refers to the refractive index of the sample, λ
represents the
0
central wavelength of the light source, and t is the period between the A-lines. By rearranging Eq. 9.2, the Doppler velocity can be defined as a function of the phase shift between A-lines. The displacement of the sample can be obtained by integrating the velocity over time as done in Eq. 9.3:
d =
t
2
t
1
vrdt =
t
2
φ(x, z, t)λ
4πnt cos θ
t
1
0
dt (9.3)
In order to calculate the mechanical elasticity, it is necessary to associate the displacement from the Doppler relationship to the elastic modulus. By definition, the strain, ε, is linearly proportional to the displacement and inversely proportional to the change in sample thickness or the compression of the sample in the axial direction, denoted by z,asshowninEq.9.4:
d
ε =
z
(9.4)
Young’s modulus, Y , is linearly proportional to the stress, σ , and inversely pro- portional to the strain, ε.InEq.9.5 below, the stress can be written as the force per area, while the strain is defined as in Eq. 9.4.
212 Y. Qu et al.
https://t.me/medicina_free
FA
Y =
dz
In compressional OCE, an elastogram is generated based on the inverse relation­ship between the displacement and Young’s modulus. For excitation methods such as ARF or air puff, it is difficult to quantify the force applied per area. Although we can calculate ARF in a well-defined geometry, it is difficult to get the precise value of ARF for in vivo applications where the distance between the transducer and tissue changes. In other words, the stress is difficult to be quantified, so a qualitative map is produced. For qualitative imaging purposes, the elasticity of healthy tissue and plaque areas can be differentiated by the differences in displacement values, with a high displacement corresponding to softer tissue. Since the difference in elasticity is often at least one order of magnitude, qualitative information is helpful in disease diagnosis.
An example of an experiment done using compressional OCE is shown in Fig. 9.1 (Qi et al. 2012). The excitation mechanism was ARF. Since the resonance frequency of phantom is within 300 Hz, a pulsed excitation was used with a modulation of 500 Hz to avoid the effects of resonance. The force was applied to a side-by­side agarose phantom with Young’s moduli of 83.6 kPa on the right-hand side and
265.7 kPa on the left side. Figure 9.1a shows the structural OCT image, where the boundary between the two different phantoms cannot be identified. Using Eq. 9.1 to isolate the phase shift, an elastogram is generated in Fig. 9.1b. It is evident that the 500 Hz modulation can be clearly observed, and the right side had a much higher phase response than the left, as shown in the amplitude plot in 1c. The measured response ratio between the left to the right side is 1:3.05. Figure 9.1d–f shows the 3D reconstruction of the same data. Since phase and displacement are proportional, it can be concluded that the right-hand side is approximately three times softer than its counterpart.
Although the compressional OCE method allows users to approximate the ratio between sample compositions, it is unable to directly offer quantitative elasticity. This is problematic when comparisons and diagnoses must be made between two different images or between different time points. Due to changes in experimental conditions and noise within the system, the displacement map cannot be effectively used to make conclusions between different samples and at different acquisition times. Because the ARF on the sample cannot be accurately measured for in vivo application, the absolute Young’s modulus cannot be extracted. This leads to methods of quantification, which will be discussed in the next section.
σ
=
ε
(9.5)
Shear Velocity Estimation
The shear wave is the second parameter that has been widely studied in OCE tech­niques (Fujimoto 2001; Catheline et al. 1999; Gennisson et al. 2005). Since it travels
9 Acoustic Radiation Force Optical Coherence Elastography 213
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 9.1 Side-by-side agarose phantom results using compressional OCE method. a OCT intensity image. b OCE phase image. c OCE amplitude plot of data in the red box. d 3D OCT reconstruction. e 3D OCE reconstruction. f Fused 3D OCT and OCE images. Scale bar: 500 µm (Qi et al. 2012)
much slower than compressional waves, it is possible to analyze its speed of motion in different mediums. We can approximate the shear wave speed, v Voigt model for a homogeneous medium consisting of a single spring and damper. In Eq. 9.6 below, μ represents the shear modulus, ω is the shear wave angular fre­quency, η is the shear viscosity, and ρ is the tissue density. ω can also be defined to be twice the shear wave frequency (Razani et al. 2012).
During OCE experiments, it is possible to use the phase maps to calculate the dis­placement of the shear wave at different locations. In order to calculate the mechanical
(ω),usinga
s
2μ2+ ω2η
=
v
(ω)
s
ρμ +
μ
2
+ ω2η
2
2
(9.6)
214 Y. Qu et al.
https://t.me/medicina_free
elasticity, we can first relate the shear modulus to the shear wave velocity informa­tion. Intuitively, the stiffer the material, the faster the shear wave propagation. In addition, the tissue density must also be considered. This relationship is shown in Eq. 9.7.
μ = ρC
2
s
(9.7)
Assuming that the tissue in question is incompressible, the Young’s modulus, which is the direct measure of elasticity, is approximately three times the value of the shear modulus.
E ≈ 3μ (9.8)
Using the above model, it is possible to obtain the elasticity map directly from the shear wave velocity. Both phase resolved Doppler and Doppler variance mea­surements can be used to detect the propagation of the shear wave (Zhu et al. 2015; Xu et al. 2016; Zhang et al. 2009; Razani et al. 2012; Chen et al. 2004; Yamakoshi et al. 1990;Quetal.2018;Heetal.2019).
In the following experiment, ARF was used as the method of excitation while a swept-source OCT system was used for the detection of shear wave (Zhu et al.
2015). The sample was an ex vivo rabbit cornea. Excitation ARF was applied in a
diagonal direction to the cornea while the detection occurred from the top. There was a shear wave that propagated from the middle of the cornea to the two sides. The results are shown in Fig. 9.2. Figure 9.2a shows the B-mode OCT image, while Fig. 9.2b represents t he propagation of the shear wave over time at each X location. The slope of the curve in Fig. 9.2b represents the distance over time or the velocity of the s hear wave propagation. Figure 9.2c shows the raw data of the shear wave location at different sampling times, where the shear wave moves from the center of the cornea to the outer boundaries continuously. In order to gather all the necessary parameters, M-mode imaging was performed at each x location.
Two limitations of the above setup include the speed of the imaging device and the effects of tissue boundary conditions. The sampling rate must be faster than the shear wave propagation speed according to the Nyquist theory. For stiffer tissues, such as calcified atherosclerotic plaques, the wave propagation is much faster, and tracing the wave with a faster light source is necessary. The location of the excitation makes a difference in the boundary conditions, which is also determined by the geometry of the structure. There may be interference between different waves that are induced and also with the interfaces of the tissue l ayers. The alignment of the excitation and detection is also crucial in generating shear waves in the intended direction with minimal boundary influences. Several studies have co-aligned the excitation and detection so that it can be adapted to in vivo tissue imaging (Nguyen et al. 2014; Wang and Larin 2014). In addition, modeling and simulations may be necessary to study the wave dynamics in different tissues. In the case of intravascular and cardiovascular imaging with live pathological tissue, heartbeat and breathing motions may have a
9 Acoustic Radiation Force Optical Coherence Elastography 215
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 9.2 Ex vivo rabbit cornea imaging. a OCT B-mode scan. b Spatial-temporal map of shear wave propagation. c Raw spatial data of shear wave propagation over time
large effect on data acquisition, and the mechanical structure may prove to be much more complex.
However, since only a single-excitation pulse is necessary to scan the entire field of view, shear wave OCE is suitable for cardiovascular applications. The pulse power is much lower than that of compressional OCE and can be kept within the federal safety limit for the Mechanical Index (MI). Also, the imaging time required is much shorter when detecting a single pulse, so large area intravascular acquisition can be performed to identify the pathological vessels within a long stretch. The successful translation of shear wave OCE imaging to in vivo studies and clinical trials would have the potential to make a great leap in the diagnosis of cardiovascular diseases.
Quantitative ARF-OCE Using Compressional Wave
The methodology of the compressional wave ARF-OCE has been outlined in the previous section. The feasibility of this method for vascular imaging will be exam­ined. The schematic diagram of an ARF-OCE system is shown in Fig. 9.3a (Qi et al.
2013). A 4 MHz ultrasound transducer was used for excitation, driven by a function
generator, and a radiofrequency amplifier. Individual pulses were given to the sam­ple with a 50% duty cycle, 60 V excitation voltage, and 500 Hz. The OCT detection of the tissue response occurs on the opposite side of the sample. The OCT system consists of an 890 nm light source, with a high axial resolution of 3.5 µm. The light is split into the reference arm, where it is reflected back with a mirror, and the sample arm, where it interacts with the tissue sample. Galvanometer mirrors are used for
216 Y. Qu et al.
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 9.3 Vascular imaging using compressional wave ARF-OCE system. a System schematic dia- gram. b OCT structural image of cadaver coronary artery. c OCE phase image under compressional wave excitation. d H&E histology of corresponding segment. e Close-up view of lesion in yellow box. Scale bar: 1 mm (Qi et al. 2012, 2013)
scanning the sample. The backscattered light from both the sample and reference arms travel back through the same path, into the detector arm, where their spectrums are detected using a line scan CCD camera. The interference signal is analyzed, and each A-line is obtained accordingly. The intensity and phase information for each A-line can be extracted by means of Eq. 9.1, so the OCT and Doppler OCE images can be obtained.
Using the system outlined in Fig. 9.3a, human cadaver coronary arteries were studied (Qi et al. 2012). The sample was placed between the ultrasound transducer