Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5919_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
15.09.2026
Размер:
15 Мб
Скачать
☆
Drug Delivery to the Musculoskeletal System: Localized Therapies and Repair 369
Fig. 5 (a) Surface modification of SWCNT for bio-applications (from Ref. [14] with permission); (b) small-dotted circle in the nuclei of live HeLa cells contain FITC-PEG-SWCNTs; (c) FRAP analysis of the intracellular FITC­PEG-SWCNTs, Blue: Free FITC bead-loaded; Green: FITC-PEG-SWCNTs bead-loaded; Red: FITC-PEG-SWCNTs internalized by incubation for 48 h (b and c reprinted with permission from Ref. [
8])

3.4 Small Molecule Delivery System

3.4.1 Intraarticular Delivery System
– In biomedical applications, near-infrared (NIR) light with
wavelengths ranging from 650 to 900 nm is mostly utilized for deeper light penetration, meaning more than a few millimeters [
1].
For musculoskeletal tissue repair and regeneration, small therapeu­tics have emerged as promising drug delivery approaches that can reduce the drawbacks of growth factors, such as immunogenic reactions, contamination issues, and protein instability [
7].
Using polyethylene glycol-modified single-walled carbon nano­tubes (PEG-SWCNTs) (Fig.
5a), Sacchetti et al. created a novel
intraarticular delivery method that delivered gene inhibitors while remaining in the joint cavity and penetrating the car tilage matrix to treat osteoarthritis.
Procedure
(i) PEG-SWCNTs were
loaded
with morpholino antisense oligo-
mers (mASOs) against green fluorescence protein (GFP).
(ii) Small regions
(dotted circle) in the nuclei of live HeLa cells containing fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-PEG-SWCNTs internalized after an incubation of 48 h (Fig.
5b).
370 Khumtya Debbarma et al.
(iii) Recovery of fluorescence intensities in the bleached area ana-
lyzed by FRAP (Fluorescence recovery after Photobleaching): Fig. 5c.
Blue data: Free FITC.
Green data: Bead-loaded FITC-PEG-SWCNTs.
Red data: FITC-PEG-SWCNTs internalized by incubation for
(iv) These loaded particles were then injected intraarticularly into
the knees.
48 h.

3.5 Gene Delivery System

3.5.1 Ex Vivo/Indirect Gene Transfer [
3.5.2 In Vivo/Direct Gene Transfer [
13]
25]
Another new approach to treating musculoskeletal disorders is gene delivery, which allows for the localized, regulated expression of therapeutic nucleic acids and or proteins.
Vector is a gene therapy primer that allows desired gene (cDNA) to insert into the host cells in a way that make them easier to translocate to the nucleus and produce high levels of transgenic expression.
(i) The desired vector is taken up and transduced into the target
cells.
(ii) They are subsequently selected and amplified.
(iii) After that, the genetically modified cells can be directly trans-
ferred to the location of musculoskeletal injury or they can be implanted into a scaffold (Fig. 6b).
(i) Direct gene transfer is the process of introducing the gene
transfer vector directly to the site of musculoskeletal injury.
Fig. 6 (a, b) Schematic image showing gene transfer therapy. (Reprinted with permission from Ref. [3])
Drug Delivery to the Musculoskeletal System: Localized Therapies and Repair 371
(ii) This will further allow the cells that come into contact with the
vector to take up the desired/target gene and to express and secrete the transgenic products locally (Fig. 6a).

3.6 Stem Cell Technology

4 Conclusion

Transformative approaches in clinical musculoskeletal repair and regeneration involve the use of tissue engineering techniques to correct disorders, resulting from tumor removal. Cell-based treat­ments in musculoskeletal drug delivery have been particularly driven by stem cell engineering, which has the potential to promote the healing of disorders and injured tissues [
31].
Procedure
(i) Stem cells are progenitor cells derived mostly from bone mar-
row and injected directly into tissues to facilitate tissue repair.
(ii) Bone marrow–derived mesenchymal stem cells possess poten-
tial for chondrogenesis, osteogenesis and radiogenesis.
(iii) These cells support the formation of bone by osteogenesis,
adipose tissue by adipogenesis, cartilage by chondrogenesis, muscle by myogenesis, and tendon/ligament formation by tendogenesis/ligamentogenesis after differentiating into mes­enchymal progenitor cells (Fig.
7).
Drug delivery has attracted growing interest as an efficacious ther­apeutic approach for treating a variety of musculoskeletal disorders, including infection, tumor, cancer, etc. In order to achieve precisely controlled and on-demand drug delivery for musculoskeletal treat­ments, many new concepts have been proposed and studied. These include the development of new drugs (such as genes, small mole­cule therapeutics, stem cells, etc.), innovative tools (such as 3D printing, tissue engineering technique, etc.), and novel delivery strategies (such as multiple delivery, smart stimuli-responsive deliv­ery, etc.), the results usually show improved outcomes in treating various musculoskeletal disorders.
In conclusion,
new systems incorporating cutting-edge thera­peutic methodologies are always emerging, but current musculo­skeletal delivery systems are still in their infancy and required additional in vivo or clinical research. Clinical investigations for the treatment of common and uncommon musculoskeletal disor­ders will continue to be motivated by the study of drug delivery due to the swift advancement of new therapeutic medications and deliv­ery methods, as well as the potential of sophisticated drug delivery systems as discussed here.
372 Khumtya Debbarma et al.
Fig. 7 Mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) differentiation. (Adapted from Ref. [

References

1. Alvarez-Lorenzo C, Bromberg L, Concheiro A (2009) Light-sensitive intelligent drug delivery systems. Photochem Photobiol 85:848–860
2. Banerjee H, Shen S, Ren H (2018) Magneti­cally actuated minimally invasive microbots for biomedical applications. Electromagnetic Actuation and Sensing in Medical Robotics, pp 11–41
3. Bhat P, Garibyan L (2022) The potential of CRISPR-guided therapies in the dermatology clinic. JID Innov 2(4):100103
4. Binder KW, Allen AJ, Yoo JJ, Atala A (2011) Drop-on-demand inkjet bioprinting: a primer. Gene Ther Regul 06:33–49
5. Briggs AM, Woolf AD, Dreinho¨fer K, Homb N, Hoy DG, Kopansky-Giles D, Akesson K, March L (2018) Reducing the
global burden of musculoskeletal conditions. Bull W H O 96:366–368
6. Chen H, Zeng X, Tham HP, Phua SZF, Cheng W, Zeng W, Shi H, Mei L, Zhao Y (2019) NIR-light-activated combination ther­apy with a precise ratio of photosensitizer and prodrug using a host-guest strategy. Angew Chem 131:7723 –7728
7. Chen Y, Huang J, Tang C, Chen X, Yin Z, Heng BC, Chen W, Shen W (2017) Small mol­ecule therapeutics for inflammation-associated chronic musculoskeletal degenerative diseases: past, present and future. Exp Cell Res 359:1–9
8. Cheng J, Reversible accumulation of PEGylated single­walled carbon nanotubes in the mammalian nucleus. ACS Nano 2(10):2085–2094
20])
Veca LM, Lamond A et al (2008)
Drug Delivery to the Musculoskeletal System: Localized Therapies and Repair 373
9.
Di J, Kim J, Hu Q, Jiang X, Gu Z (2015) Spatiotemporal drug delivery using laser­generated-focused ultrasound system. J Con­trol Release 220:592–599
10. Dixon SJ, Chidiac P (2018) Editorial overview: musculoskeletal: new therapeutic targets and delivery systems. Curr Opin Pharmacol 40:ix– xi
11. Estelrich J, Escribano E, Queralt J, Busquets MA (2015) Iron oxide nanoparticles magnetically-guided and magnetically­responsive drug delivery. Int J Mol Sci 16: 8070–8101
12. Evans CH, Huard J (2015) Gene therapy approaches to regenerating the musculoskeletal system. Nat Rev Rheumatol 11:234–242
13. Evans CH (2007) Facilitated endogenous repair: making tissue engineering simple, prac­tical, and economical. Tissue Eng 13:1987– 1993
14. Gao Z, Varela JA, Groc L, Lounis B (2015) Toward the suppression of cellular toxicity from single-walled carbon nanotubes. Bioma­terials. Science 4(2):230
15. Geiger BC, Grodzinsky AJ, Hammond PT (2018) Designing drug delivery systems for articular joints. Chem Eng Prog 114:46–51
16. Gulzar A, Gai S, Yang P, Li C, Ansari MB, Lin J (2015) Stimuli responsive drug delivery appli­cation of polymer and silica in biomedicine. J Mater Chem B 3:8599–8622
17. Im GI (2018) Application of kartogenin for musculoskeletal regeneration. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 106:1141–1148
18. Johnson RW, Sowder ME, Giaccia AJ (2017) Hypoxia and bone metastatic disease. Curr Osteoporos Rep 15:231–238
19. Kocak G, Tuncer C, Bu¨tu¨n V (2017) pH-responsive polymers. Polym Chem 8:144– 176
20. Hankenson KH (2020) 49 Stem cells for mus­culoskeletal repair. Musculoskeletal Key
21. Kwee BJ, Mooney DJ (2017) Biomaterials for skeletal muscle tissue engineering. Curr Opin Biotechnol 47:16–22
22. Loebel C, Burdick JA (2018) Engineering stem and stromal cell therapies for musculoskeletal tissue repair. Cell Stem Cell 22:325–339
23. Lu Y, Sun W, Gu Z (2014) Stimuli-responsive nanomaterials for therapeutic protein delivery. J Control Release 194:1–19
24. Manzano M, Vallet-Regı´ M (2012) Revisiting bioceramics: bone regenerative and local drug delivery systems. Prog Solid State Chem 40: 17–30
for
25. Minas T (2012) A primer in cartilage repair. J Bone Joint Surg 94:141–146
26. Mirani B, Pagan E, Shojaei S, Dabiri SMH, Savoji H, Mehrali M, Sam M, Alsaif J, Bhilad­vala RB, Dolatshahi-Pirouz A, Radisic M, Akbari M, Facile. (2020) Method for fabrica­tion of meter-long multifunctional hydrogel fibers with controllable biophysical and bio­chemical features. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 12:9080–9089
27. Mura S, Nicolas J, Couvreur P (2013) Stimuli­responsive nanocarriers for drug delivery. Nat Mater 12:991–1003
28. Newman MR, Benoit DS (2016) Local and targeted drug delivery for bone regeneration. Curr Opin Biotechnol 40:125–132
29. Padilla S, Sanchez M, Orive G, Anitua E (2017) Human-based biological and biomi­metic autologous therapies for musculoskeletal tissue regeneration. Trends Biotechnol 35: 192–202
30. Peddada KV, Peddada KV, Shukla SK, Mishra A, Verma V (2015) Role of curcumin in common musculoskeletal disorders: a review of current laboratory, translational, and clinical data. Orthop Surg 7:222–231
31. Pourquie long road to making muscle in vitro. Curr Top Dev Biol 129:123–142
32. Rasel SI, Mohona FA, Akter W et al (2022) Exploration of site-specific drug targeting—a review on EPR-, stimuli-, chemical-, and receptor-based approaches as potential drug targeting methods in cancer treatment. J Oncol 48:1–26
33. Sahle FF, Gulfam M, Lowe TL (2018) Design strategies for physical-stimuli-responsive pro­grammable nanotherapeutics. Drug Discov Today 23:992–1006
34. Santos SS, Gonzaga RV, Silva JV, Savino DF, Prieto D, Shikay JM, Silva RS, Paulo LHA, Ferreira EI, Giarolla J (2017) Peptide dendri­mers: drug/gene delivery and other approaches. Can J Chem 95:907–916
35. Sorkio A, Koch L, Koivusalo L, Deiwick A, Miettinen S, Chichkov B, Skottman H (2018) Human stem cell based corneal tissue mimick­ing structures using laser-assisted 3D bioprint­ing and functional bioinks. Biomaterials 171: 57–71
36. Stringer J, Derby B (2010) Formation and stability of lines produced by inkjet printing. Langmuir 26:10365–10372
37. Tagami T, Foltz WD, Ernsting MJ, Lee CM, Tannock IF, May JP, Li SD (2011) MRI
´
O, Al Tanoury Z, Chal J (2018) The
374 Khumtya Debbarma et al.
monitoring of intratumoral drug delivery and prediction of the therapeutic effect with a mul­tifunctional thermosensitive liposome. Bioma­terials 32:6570–6578
38. Torchilin VP (2014) Multifunctional,
stimuli­sensitive nanoparticulate systems for drug delivery. Nat Rev Drug Discov 13:813–827
39. Tuan RS (2013) Regenerative medicine in 2012: the coming of age of musculoskeletal tissue engineering. Nat Rev Rheumatol 9:74– 76
40. Vinay R, Kusum DV (2016) Potential of tar­geted drug delivery system for the treatment of bone metastasis. Drug Deliv 23:21–29
41. Vulic K, Shoichet MS (2014) Affinity-based drug delivery systems for tissue repair and regeneration. Biomacromolecules 15:3867– 3880
42. Wang Z, Abdulla R, Parker B, Samanipour R, Ghosh S, Kim K (2015) A simple and high­resolution stereolithography-based 3D bio­printing system using visible light crosslinkable bioinks. Biofabrication 7:045009
43. Wang Z, Kumar H, Tian Z, Jin X, Holzman JF, Menard F, Kim K (2018) Visible light
photoinitiation of cell-adhesive gelatin metha­cryloyl hydrogels for stereolithography 3D bio­printing. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10: 26859–26869
44. Wang Z, Wen F, Lim PN, Zhang Q, Konishi T, Wang D, Teoh SH, Thian ES (2017) Nanoma­terial scaffolds to regenerate musculoskeletal tissue: signals from within for neovessel forma­tion. Drug Discov Today 22:1385–1391
45. Xia H, Zhao Y, Tong R (2016) Ultrasound­mediated polymeric micelle drug delivery, in: therapeutic ultrasound, country. Ther Ultrasound
46. Zardad AZ, Choonara YE, Toit LCD, Kumar P, Mabrouk M, Kondiah PPD, Pillay V (2016) A review of thermo-and ultrasound­responsive polymeric systems for delivery of chemotherapeutic agents. Polymers 8:359
47. Zhang S, Xing M, Li B (2018) Biomimetic layer-by-layer self-assembly of nanofilms, nano­coatings, and 3D scaffolds for tissue engineer­ing. Int J Mol Sci 19:1641
48. Ziemba AM, Gilbert RJ (2017) Biomaterials for local, controlled drug delivery to the injured spinal cord. Front Phar macol 8:245
Chapter 17
Drug Delivery to the Reproductive System: Innovations and Therapeutic Advances
Dhaval J. Kamothi , Ayushi Vaidhya, Nabaneeta Smaraki, and Harsh R. Jogi
Abstract
The reproductive system poses distinct physiological challenges for effective drug delivery, necessitating innovative strategies to navigate various biological barriers, including the blood-testis barrier, vaginal mucosa, and cervix. Targeted drug delivery is essential for addressing prevalent conditions that require therapeutic intervention, such as reproductive cancers, infertility, and sexually transmitted infections. Recent advancements in drug delivery systems, particularly those utilizing nanotechnology, have demon­strated significant potential in enhancing the therapeutic efficacy of various agents. Platforms like nano­particles and liposomes facilitate targeted drug delivery, whereas hydrogels and biodegradable polymers enable localized and controlled release of therapeutics. Innovations in injectable and implantable systems, such as drug-eluting intrauterine devices and subdermal implants, have further optimized sustained drug release mechanisms. Additionally, micro- and nano-needles offer minimally invasive methods for direct administration to reproductive tissues. Route-specific delivery methods, including vaginal, uterine, and penile applications, have been investigated to improve bioavailability and patient compliance. Moreover, targeted and precision medicine approaches, encompassing gene therapy and personalized medicine, are advancing tailored treatment protocols based on individual genetic and molecular profiles. The therapeutic landscape includes applications in assisted reproductive technologies and the management of reproductive cancers and infections, highlighting the transformative potential of advanced drug delivery systems to enhance patient outcomes. Nonetheless, considerations regarding safety and regulatory compliance remain paramount in the development and application of these innovative therapies, emphasizing the need for ongoing research in this critical domain of reproductive health.
Key words Targeted drug delivery, Nanoparticles, Hydrogels, Intrauterine devices, Micro-needles, Gene therapy, Personalized medicine

1 Introduction

Reproductive health is a complex and comprehensive concept that includes the physical, mental, and social dimensions of well-being as they relate to the reproductive system and its functions. Accord­ing to the World Health Organization (WHO), reproductive health
375
376 Dhaval J. Kamothi et al.
refers to a state of complete well-being in these aspects, beyond merely the absence of disease or dysfunction in relation to the reproductive system and its processes [ tional Conference on tified five key components essential for sexual and reproductive health care: (1) enhancing services related to antenatal, perinatal, postpartum, and newborn care; (2) providing comprehensive fam­ily planning services, including treatments for infertility; (3) reduc­ing the incidence of unsafe abortions; (4) fostering overall sexual and reproductive health; and (5) addressing v conditions of the sexually transmitted diseases (STDs), and gynecological disorders
. Various strategies have been embraced by the scientific com-
[
3]
munity chapter will examine innovative methods created by researchers globally to address the physical and medical challenges associated with sexual and reproductive health.
to sexual and reproductive health is crucial. Individuals of all gen­ders can experience a range of health issues, which can be categor­ized into four main groups: first, infectious diseases, including sexually transmitted infections like human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) [ uterine, and ovarian cancers in women, as well as prostate cancer in men [5, 6]; third, infertility, which may arise from factors related to either gender and often necessitates the use of assisted reproductive technology (ART) for treatment [ such as endometriosis, fibroids, and polycystic ovary syndrome [8, 9].
1, 2
]. The Cairo Interna-
Population and Development in 2004 iden-
arious pathological
reproductive system, such as cancer, infections,
enhance
to
Understanding the physical and pathological challenges related
sexual and reproductive health services. This
4]; second, various cancers, such as breast, cervical,
7]; and finally, other conditions

2 Importance of Targeted Drug Delivery to the Reproductive System

Targeted drug delivery systems (TDDSs) are designed to deliver drug precisely to the tumor site, enhancing efficacy and minimizing side effects. This is particularly important in treating ovarian cancer, which has a high mortality rate and poor prognosis due to extensive
10].
abdominal metastasis and late diagnosis [ ductive system is prone to various infections, injuries, and physio­logical changes. Advanced drug delivery platforms can significantly improve the treatment of these conditions by targeting specific cell populations or intracellular environments. TDDSs allow for con­trolled drug release, which is essential for maintaining therapeutic drug levels over extended periods. This is beneficial in managing chronic conditions and reducing the frequency of drug administra­tion [
10].
Advanced drug delivery approaches are being developed for biopharmaceuticals, including vaccines, antibiotics, nucleic acids, proteins, and peptides. These approaches can enhance the
The human repro-
Advances in Drug Delivery to the Reproductive System 377
delivery and effectiveness of these complex molecules in the repro­ductive system. In ovarian cancer, chemoresistance is a significant challenge. TDDSs can help overcome this by ensuring that higher concentrations of the drug reach the tumor site, thereby improving the overall treatment outcome.

3 Challenges in Drug Delivery to the Reproductive System

The challenges in drug delivery to the reproductive system are multifaceted and can significantly impact the effectiveness of treat­ments for infertility and related conditions. One of the primary challenges is the anatomical and physiological barriers that drugs must overcome to reach their target sites within the female repro­ductive tract (FRT). The unique environment of the FRT, includ­ing its mucosal barriers and varying pH levels, can hinder the absorption and efficacy of therapeutic agents [ traditional drug delivery methods often face limitations such as short contact time with the mucosa and variability in individual anatomy, which necessitate the development of innovative delivery systems [
(UGT) encounters multiple obstacles that can be categorized as anatomical, physiological, or behavioral. These challenges encom­pass the local epithelial barrier, the presence of drug transporters and metabolizing enzymes, the composition of the surrounding tissue (including immune cells), the influence of microbiota, the hormonal environment, the adequacy of blood supply and lym­phatic drainage, the existence of dynamic fluids with intricate com­positions, the necessity for sterility, the risk of non-target drug exposure, potential side effects, and the overall anatomical accessi­bility of the region [
infertility treatments. High costs associated with assisted reproduc­tive technologies (ART) and the lack of adequate insurance cover­age can lead to delays or discontinuation of therapy, particularly among low-income populations [ scores the need for health sector authorities to develop cost­effective solutions and improve access to ART services, ensuring that financial constraints do not prevent couples from receiving necessary treatments [
lenges, including physiological barriers, the need for innovative delivery systems, and economic constraints. Addressing these issues through advancements in nanotechnology and policy changes can enhance the effectiveness of treatments for infertility and improve overall reproductive health outcomes.
13].
The administration of drugs to the upper gastrointestinal tract
14].
Financial b
Drug
arr
iers also pose significant challenges to accessing
15]. This economic aspect under-
15]
.
delivery to the reproductive system faces several chal-
11, 12]. For instance,
378 Dhaval J. Kamothi et al.
Nanotechnology and other techniques has emerged as a promising solution to enhance drug delivery in reproductive health. The use of nanocarriers can improve the bioavailability of drugs while minimizing side effects, thereby creating more effective treatment regimens [ release drugs in a controlled manner, targeting specific tissues within the reproductive system and potentially increasing the ther­apeutic outcomes for conditions such as endometriosis and uterine fibroids [
17]. Moreover, advancements in sol-gel formulations have
shown potential for intravaginal drug delivery, offering a versatile platform for the administration of various therapeutic agents [11].

4 Advances in Drug Delivery Systems

The advanced drug delivery systems include use of delivery systems such as nanoparticles, liposomes, hydrogels and polymer gels, micro and nano needles and others (Fig.
12, 16]. These systems can be designed to
1).
4.1 Nanotechnology­Based Delivery Systems
Nanomedicine represents a biotechnological strategy for the deliv­ery of therapeutics, employing nanoparticles (NPs) to facilitate the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of various medical conditions
18]. Due to their nanoscale dimensions, specifically those measur-
[ ing less than 100 nm, NPs exhibit unique properties that allow for targeted drug delivery and protection of therapeutic agents
19]. The functionalization of NP surfaces improves the selective
[ targeting of particular cells or tissues, while the encapsulation of therapeutic agents minimizes metabolic degradation and extends
Fig. 1 Representative images of the different advanced drug delivery systems