Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5919_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Preface
- •Contents
- •Contributors
- •1. Introduction
- •2. The Initial Phase of Drug Delivery Systems
- •3. Recent Drug Delivery Systems
- •4. Drug Delivery via Carriers
- •5.4 Polymer-Lipid Hybrid Nanoparticles Drug Delivery System
- •5.5 Self-Micro Emulsifying Drug Delivery System
- •5.6 In Situ Gel Drug Delivery System
- •5.8 Targeted Drug Delivery
- •6. Ceramic-Based Drug Delivery System
- •7. Polysaccharide-Based Drug Delivery System
- •8. Closed Loop Insulin Delivery System
- •9. Liposome-Mediated Drug Delivery
- •5. Recent Drug Delivery Systems
- •5.3 Hexagonal Boron Nitride Nanosheet Drug Delivery System
- •10. Dendrimers
- •11. PEGylated Drug Delivery System
- •12. Antibody-Drug Conjugate System
- •13. Mesoporous Silica-Based Drug Delivery
- •14. Transdermal Drug Delivery System
- •15. Hydrogel-Mediated Ocular Drug Delivery
- •16. Challenges with Current Drug Delivery Systems
- •17. Future Direction and Conclusion
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Pharmacokinetic Principles
- •2.1 Application of the Pharmacokinetic Principle in the Biomedical Fields
- •3. Cell Membrane/Biological Membrane
- •3.1 Passage of Drugs Across Biological Membranes
- •3.1.1 Simple Transport
- •3.1.2 Specialized Transport
- •4. Routes of Drug Administration
- •4.1 Oral (Enteral) Versus Parenteral Administration
- •4.2 Various Routes of Drug Administration
- •5. Absorption
- •5.1 Factors Affecting Absorption of Drugs
- •5.1.1 Physio-chemical Characteristics
- •5.1.2 Dosage Form
- •5.1.3 Concentration and Volume
- •5.1.4 Blood Flow
- •5.1.5 Surface Area
- •5.1.6 Administration Route
- •5.1.7 Disease States
- •5.2 Gastrointestinal Tract
- •5.3 Parenteral Sites
- •5.4 Pulmonary Sites (Alveoli)
- •5.5 Topical Sites
- •6. Distribution
- •6.1 Factors Affecting Distribution of Drugs
- •6.1.1 Physicochemical Properties of the Drug
- •6.1.2 Binding to Plasma and Tissue Proteins
- •6.1.3 Blood Flow and Organ Size
- •6.1.4 Specialized Compartments and Barriers
- •6.1.5 Specialized Transport Systems
- •6.1.6 Disease States
- •6.1.7 Physiological Factors
- •7. Metabolism/Biotransformation
- •7.1 Functions of Metabolism
- •7.2 Sites of Metabolism
- •7.3.1 Microsomal Enzymes
- •7.3.2 Non-microsomal Enzymes
- •7.4 Pathways of Biotransformation
- •8. Excretion
- •8.1 Routes of Excretion
- •8.1.1 Renal Excretion of Drugs
- •8.1.2 Extra-Renal Excretion of Drugs
- •9.1 Minimum Effective Concentration (MEC)
- •9.2 Maximum Safe Concentration (MSC) or Minimum Toxic Concentration (MTC)
- •9.4 Area Under the Curve (AUC)
- •9.5 Peak Effect
- •9.7 Onset of Action
- •9.8 Onset Time
- •9.9 Duration of Action
- •10. Order of Pharmacokinetic Processes
- •10.1 Zero-Order Kinetics
- •10.2 First-Order Kinetics
- •10.3 Mixed-Order Kinetics
- •11. Pharmacokinetic Models
- •11.1 Compartmental Models
- •11.3 Physiological Models
- •12. Determinants of Pharmacokinetics
- •12.1 Absorption
- •12.1.1 Bioavailability
- •12.1.2 Bioequivalence
- •12.1.3 Area Under Curve (AUC)
- •12.2 Distribution
- •12.2.1 Volume of Distribution
- •12.3 Elimination
- •12.3.2 Clearance (Cl) or Body Clearance
- •13. Conclusion
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Principles of Targeted Drug Delivery
- •3.1 Changes in pH and Salt Development
- •3.7 Dendrimers
- •4.1 Small-Sized Molecule-Based Targeting Strategies
- •4.2 Nucleic Acid Fragment-Based Targeting Strategies
- •4.3 Peptide- and Antibody-Based Targeting Strategies
- •4.4 Cell-Based Targeting Strategies
- •5. Conclusion
- •References
- •3.4 Liposomes
- •3.5 Solid Lipid Nanoparticles
- •3.6 Co-crystal Preparation
- •1. Introduction
- •2. History
- •3.1 Organic Nanoparticles
- •3.2 Inorganic Nanoparticles
- •4. Nanotechnology-Based Drug Delivery Systems
- •4.1 Smart Drug Delivery Systems
- •4.3 Multifunctional Drug Carriers
- •4.4 Organic/Inorganic Composites
- •5. Nanoparticulate Drug Delivery Systems
- •5.1 Liposomes
- •5.2 Microemulsions
- •5.3 Nanoparticles
- •6. Applications
- •6.1 Enhanced Drug Delivery
- •6.2 Overcoming Biological Barriers
- •6.3 Controlled Drug Release
- •6.4 Combination Therapy
- •6.5 Personalized Medicine
- •7. Limitations
- •7.1 Complexity and Cost
- •7.2 Biocompatibility and Toxicity
- •7.3 Stability and Shelf Life
- •7.4 Drug Loading and Release
- •7.5 Biological Barriers and Clearance
- •8. Conclusions
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Guidelines for Design of Lipid-Based Formulations
- •3. Formulation Strategies
- •3.1 Lipid Nanoparticles
- •3.1.1 Solid Lipid Nanoparticles (SLNs)
- •3.1.2 Nanostructured Lipid Carriers (NLCs)
- •3.2 Liposomes
- •3.2.1 Conventional Liposomes
- •3.2.2 PEGylated Liposomes
- •3.2.3 Multifunctional Liposomes
- •3.3 Microemulsions and Self-micro Emulsifying Drug Delivery Systems (SMEDDS)
- •3.4 Hybrid Systems
- •3.4.1 Lipid-Polymer Hybrid Nanoparticles
- •3.4.2 Lipid-Protein Hybrid Systems
- •4. Advanced Characterization Methods
- •4.1 In Vitro and In Vivo Assessment
- •4.1.1 Dissolution Studies
- •4.1.2 Permeability Studies
- •4.2 Imaging Techniques
- •4.2.1 Electron Microscopy
- •4.2.2 Fluorescence Imaging
- •Fluorescent Probes
- •Confocal Microscopy
- •4.2.3 Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
- •4.3 Stability Studies
- •4.3.1 Oxidative Stability
- •4.3.2 Thermal Stability
- •5. Applications of Lipid-Based Drug Delivery Systems
- •5.1 Cancer Therapy
- •5.1.1 Targeted Drug Delivery
- •5.1.2 Combination Therapy
- •5.2 Central Nervous System Disorders
- •5.2.2 Neuroprotective Effects
- •5.3 Antiviral and Antimicrobial Applications
- •5.3.1 Lipid Nanoparticles for Antiviral Drugs
- •5.3.2 Antibiotic Delivery Systems
- •6. Future Perspectives and Challenges
- •7. Conclusion
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •3. Design and Characterization of Polymeric Drug Delivery Systems
- •4. Responsive Polymers
- •4.1 Polymeric Hydrogels
- •4.1.1 Characterization of Polymeric Hydrogels
- •Structural Analysis
- •Functional Analysis
- •4.2 Polymeric Micelles
- •4.2.1 Characterization of Polymeric Micelle
- •Critical Micelle Concentration Determination (CMC)
- •Morphological Characterization
- •Physicochemical Characterization
- •4.3 Liposomes
- •4.3.1 Ethosome
- •4.3.2 Transferosome
- •4.3.3 Niosome
- •4.4 Polyplexes or Polymer-Drug Conjugates
- •4.4.1 Dendrimers
- •4.4.2 Polymer-Protein Conjugates
- •4.4.3 Polymeric Nanoparticles
- •5. Conclusion
- •6. Future Prospects
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •2.1 Types of Stimuli
- •3. Mechanism of Stimuli Responsiveness
- •3.1 pH-Responsive Systems
- •4. Materials
- •4.1 pH-Responsive Materials
- •4.4 Synthetic Thermo-Responsive Materials
- •4.7 Magnetic Responsive Materials
- •4.8.1 Intrinsically Conducting Polymers
- •4.8.2 Hydrogels
- •5. Methods
- •5.1 pH-Responsive Drug Delivery Systems
- •6. Conclusion
- •7. Notes
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •3. Basic Features Required for the Biomaterial
- •4. Characteristics of Biomaterials
- •6. Biocompatibility as the Crucial Item
- •7. Biomaterials in Drug Delivery
- •8. Controlled Drug Delivery
- •9. Clinical Need for Controlled Drug Delivery
- •10. Biomaterials for Controlled Release of Small Molecules
- •11. Bioresponsive Polymers: From Design to Implementation
- •11.3 Hydrolysis and Enzymatically Responsive Polymers
- •11.7 Swelling and Contracting Polymers
- •12. Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems
- •12.1 Barriers to Transdermal Delivery
- •12.2 Development of Transdermal Drug Delivery Patches
- •12.3 Hydrogels Versus Non-hydrogel Polymeric Patches
- •12.4 Patches Based on Biopolymers
- •12.5 Patches Based on Synthetic Polymers
- •12.6 Drug Particles/Carriers
- •12.7 Commercial Patches
- •13. Smart Biomaterials
- •14. Conclusion and Future Perspective
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •1.1 Historical Evolution
- •2. Skin Anatomy and Physiology
- •2.1 Cutaneous Layer Organization
- •2.2 Cutaneous Barrier Function
- •3. Mechanisms of Transdermal Drug Delivery
- •4. Formulation Strategies for Transdermal Drug Delivery
- •4.1 Drug Selection Criteria
- •4.2 Vehicle and Excipient Considerations
- •4.3 Permeation Enhancers
- •4.4 Transdermal Drug Delivery Technologies
- •5. Evaluation Methods for Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems
- •6. Applications of Transdermal Drug Delivery
- •6.1 Therapeutic Areas
- •6.2 Case Studies of Successful Transdermal Products
- •7. Regulatory Considerations and Approval Process
- •7.1 FDA Guidelines for Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems
- •7.2 Quality Control and Manufacturing Standards
- •7.3 Clinical Trial Requirements
- •8. Challenges and Future Perspectives
- •8.1 Overcoming Cutaneous Barrier Properties
- •8.2 Expanding the Range of Deliverable Drugs
- •8.3 Intelligent and Responsive Transdermal Systems
- •8.4 Integration with Other Drug Delivery Technologies
- •8.5 Conclusion
- •References
- •1. Background
- •2. Importance of the Tumor Microenvironment (TME) in Cancer Progression and Therapy
- •2.1 Components of the TME
- •2.2 Therapeutic Targeting of the TME
- •2.3 Impact of Standard Therapies on the TME
- •3. Tumor-Homing Peptides
- •3.1 Different Strategies for Targeting Peptides to Tumor Microenvironment
- •3.2 Applications and Development
- •3.3 Examples and Discoveries
- •4. Tumor Microenvironment Responsive Drug Delivery Systems (DDSS)
- •5. Nanoparticle-Based Smart Drug Delivery Systems
- •5.1.1 Endogenous Stimulus-Responsive Drug Delivery Systems (DDSs)
- •5.1.2 Exogenous Stimulus-Responsive DDSs
- •5.2.2 Dynamic Strategies for Tumor Targeting
- •6. Challenges and Opportunities for Targeted Delivery to Cancer Cells
- •7. Future Directions
- •8. Conclusions
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Materials
- •2.1 Types of Biosensors
- •2.1.2 Smart Polymers
- •2.1.3 Microfabricated Devices
- •2.2.1 Enzyme-Based Biosensors
- •2.2.2 Antibody-Based Biosensors
- •2.2.3 Aptamer-Based Biosensors
- •2.2.4 Whole-Cell-Based Biosensors
- •3. Methods
- •3.1 Approach Toward Designing Biosensors
- •3.1.1 Selection of the Analyte and Bioreceptors
- •3.1.2 Immobilization of Biosensors
- •3.1.3 Selection of Transducer
- •3.2 Green Biosensors
- •3.3 Challenges in Development of Biosensors-Based Drug Delivery Systems
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •3. Ocular Barriers Hindering Absorption of Drugs
- •3.1 Precorneal Barriers
- •3.1.1 Tear Film, Tear Turnover, and Nasolacrimal Duct Drainage
- •3.1.3 Conjunctival and Scleral Barriers
- •3.2 Corneal Barrier
- •3.3 Blood-Ocular Barriers
- •4. Various Routes for Ocular Drug Delivery
- •4.1 Topical Administration
- •4.2 Subconjunctival Administration
- •4.3 Transscleral Administration
- •4.4 Intracameral Administration
- •4.5 Intravitreal Injections/Implants (IVIs)
- •4.6 Retrobulbar Administration
- •4.7 Systemic Administration
- •5. Nanotechnology-Based Ocular Drug Delivery Platforms
- •5.1 Nanoparticles (NPs)
- •5.1.1 Polymeric Nanoparticles (PNPs)
- •5.2 Nanomicelles
- •5.3 Nanoemulsions (NEs)
- •5.4 Nanosuspensions
- •5.5 Nanocrystals (NCs)
- •5.6 Liposomes
- •5.7 Microemulsions
- •5.8 Niosomes
- •5.10 Dendrimers
- •5.11 Nanowafers
- •5.12 Cubosomes
- •5.13 Bilosomes
- •5.14 Olaminosomes
- •5.15 Contact Lenses
- •5.16 Hydrogels
- •5.17 Microneedles (MNs)
- •6. Alternative Ocular Drug Delivery Approaches
- •6.1 Gene Therapy
- •6.1.1 Viral Vectors
- •6.1.2 Non-viral Vectors
- •6.1.3 Antisense Oligonucleotides (ASOs), RNAi, CRISPR-Cas9
- •6.2 Exosomes
- •6.3 Self-nano Emulsifying Drug Delivery Structures (SNEDDS)
- •7. Clinical Status of Nanotechnology-Based Ocular Drug Delivery Systems
- •8. Future Outlooks
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Anatomy and Physiology of GIT
- •2.1 Mouth and Esophagus
- •2.2 Stomach
- •2.3 Small Intestine
- •2.4 Ruminant Digestive System
- •3. Blood Supply
- •4. Nerve Supply
- •5. Challenges in GIT Drug Delivery
- •5.1 Acidic Environment of the Stomach
- •5.2 Alkaline pH of the Intestine
- •5.3 Variable GI Transit Times
- •6. Future Opportunities in GIT Drug Delivery
- •6.1.1 Targeted Delivery Systems
- •6.1.2 Ligand-Conjugated Nanoparticles
- •6.1.3 Liposomes
- •6.1.4 Solid Lipid Nanoparticles
- •6.2 Controlled Release Systems
- •6.2.1 Osmotic Pumps
- •6.2.2 Matrix Systems
- •6.3 Mucoadhesive Systems
- •6.3.1 Mucoadhesive Polymers
- •6.4 Absorption Enhancers
- •6.5 Tight Junction Modulators
- •6.6 Development of Prodrugs
- •7. Conclusion
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Anatomy and Physiology of the Respiratory System
- •3. Traditional Methods of Respiratory Drug Delivery
- •3.1 Metered-Dose Inhalers (MDIs)
- •3.2 Dry Powder Inhalers (DPIs)
- •3.3 Nebulizers
- •3.5 Improved Patient Compliance Through User-Friendly Devices
- •3.8 Enhanced Absorption by Overcoming Biological Barriers
- •3.9 Macromolecule Delivery Facilitation
- •3.10 Reduced Side Effects Through Improved Targeting
- •3.11 Formulation Challenges Addressed
- •3.12 Smart Technology Integration for Personalized Treatment
- •3.13 Environmental Sustainability Considerations
- •4. Novel Drug Delivery Approaches
- •4.2 Liposomal Formulations
- •5. Advanced Inhalation Devices
- •6. Targeted Drug Delivery Strategies
- •6.2 pH-Responsive Drug Release
- •7. Emerging Therapeutics for Respiratory Diseases
- •8.2 Combination Therapies
- •8.3 Prodrug Approaches
- •9. Personalized Medicine in Respiratory Drug Delivery
- •10. Future Perspectives and Emerging Technologies
- •10.1 3D-Printed Inhalers
- •11. Conclusion
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Delivery of Small Molecules
- •3. Drawbacks of Conventional Drug Delivery System
- •4. Factors Affecting Cardiovascular Drug Targeting System
- •4.1 Particle Shape
- •4.2 Particle Size
- •4.3 Particle Density
- •4.4 Flow Characteristics
- •5. Various Targeted Drug Delivery Systems
- •5.1 Application of Exosomes and EVs (Extracellular Vesicles)
- •5.4 Nanomedicines in Cardiovascular Therapy
- •5.5 PLGA-Based Nanoparticles
- •5.6 Liposomal Delivery Systems
- •5.7 Delivery of Biologicals
- •5.8 RNA-Based Delivery
- •5.9 Therapeutic Proteins and Peptides
- •6. Future Perspectives and Challenges
- •7. Conclusion
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Materials
- •2.1 Equipment
- •2.2 Drugs
- •3. Methods
- •3.1.1 Extrusion-Based 3D Bioprinting
- •3.1.2 Inkjet 3D Bioprinting
- •3.1.3 Light-Based Bioprinting
- •3.1.4 Laser-Assisted Printing
- •3.2 Multiple Drug Delivery
- •3.2.1 Multilayer Films with Capsule-Integrated Polypeptide/Polyelectrolyte
- •3.2.2 Multilayer Shells Using Polypeptides/Polyelectrolytes (PL or PG) and LbL Assembly
- •3.3.1 Physical Stimulation-Responsive Drug Delivery Systems
- •3.3.4 Light-Responsive Drug Delivery Systems (LRDDS)
- •3.4 Small Molecule Delivery System
- •3.4.1 Intraarticular Delivery System
- •3.5 Gene Delivery System
- •3.6 Stem Cell Technology
- •4. Conclusion
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Importance of Targeted Drug Delivery to the Reproductive System
- •3. Challenges in Drug Delivery to the Reproductive System
- •4. Advances in Drug Delivery Systems
- •4.2 Liposomes
- •4.3 Hydrogels and Biodegradable Polymers
- •4.4 Injectable and Implantable Devices
- •4.5 Micro- and Nano-Needles
- •4.6 Spermbots
- •5.1 Vaginal and Cervical Delivery
- •5.2 Uterine and Intrauterine Delivery
- •5.3 Penile and Testicular Delivery
- •6. Targeted and Precision Medicine Approaches
- •6.1 Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT)
- •6.2 Gene Therapy and RNA-Based Approaches
- •6.3 Personalized Medicine in Reproductive Disorders
- •7. Therapeutic Applications and Innovations
- •7.1 Infertility and Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART)
- •7.2 Treatment of Reproductive Cancers
- •7.4 Contraceptive Technologies
- •8. Safety and Regulatory Considerations
- •9. Future Directions and Emerging Trends
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Liposomes
- •3. Preparation of Liposomes
- •3.1 Reagents
- •3.2 Hydration and Liposome Extrusion
- •3.4 Conjugation
- •3.8 PEGylation
- •3.8.1 Materials Required
- •3.8.2 Procedure
- •3.9 Liposomal Doxorubicin (LD)
- •3.10 Marqibo (Vincristine Sulfate)
- •3.11 DepoCyt (Cytarabine)
- •4. Poly(Lactic-co-Glycolic Acid, PLGA) Nanoparticles
- •4.2 Methods
- •4.2.1 Reagents
- •4.2.2 Procedure
- •5. Polycaprolactone (PCL)
- •5.2 pH Sensitivity and Stability
- •5.3 Methods
- •5.3.1 Materials
- •5.4 Drug Loading
- •6. Chitosan-Based Systems
- •6.1 Encapsulation of Nucleic Acids and Proteins
- •6.3 pH Sensitivity and Stability of Chitosan Nanoparticles
- •6.4 Methodology
- •6.4.1 Reagents
- •6.4.2 Procedure
- •7. Dendrimers
- •7.1 Antisense Oligonucleotides
- •7.2 Small-Interfering RNA (siRNA)
- •7.4.1 Divergent Method
- •7.4.2 Convergent Method
- •8. Challenges in Developing Orphan Drugs
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Vaccine Delivery Systems
- •3. Polymers
- •4. Non-biodegradable NPs
- •5. Calcium Phosphate NPs
- •6. Colloidally Stable Nanoparticles
- •7. Proteasomes
- •8. Liposomes
- •9. Virus-like Particles (VLPs) and Virosomes
- •10. Immune-Stimulating Complexes ISCOMs
- •11. Emulsion Delivery Systems
- •12. Exosome-Based Vaccine Delivery System
- •13. Immunotherapy Using Nano- and Microparticles
- •14. Properties and Role of Nanoparticles in Drug Delivery
- •15. Biomimicry
- •16. Micellar Systems
- •17. Hydrogels
- •18. Edible Vaccines
- •19. Plant-Derived Viruses
- •20. Melt-in Mouth Strips
- •21. Transdermal Delivery
- •22. Delivery of Nucleic Acids
- •23. mRNA Delivery
- •24. Delivery of Cytokines
- •25. DC Targeting
- •26. Drug Delivery Targeting T Cells
- •27. Conclusions
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Materials
- •2.1 Equipment
- •2.2 Reagents and Solutions
- •3. Methods
- •3.1 Adenovirus
- •3.3 Retroviral Vectors (RV)
- •3.4 Lentivirus (LV)
- •4. Conclusion
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Technologies Utilizing Cells in Treating Diseases
- •2.1 Somatic Cell Technologies
- •2.2 Immortalized Cell Lines
- •2.5 Genome Editing Technologies
- •2.6 Cell Plasticity Technologies
- •3. Different Kinds of Cells Are Utilized in the Process of Cell Treatment
- •4. The Practices of Regenerative Medicine and Cell Therapy
- •4.1 Veterinary Medicine Therapeutic Uses
- •5. Advancements and Challenges in Drug Delivery
- •6. Drug Delivery Systems and Applications
- •6.2 Drug Nanocarriers Based on Hyaluronic Acid
- •6.3 Hexagonal Boron Nitride Nanosheet Drug Delivery System
- •6.4 Polymer-Lipid Hybrid Nanoparticles
- •6.6 In Situ Gel Drug Delivery System

x Contributors
SHIVALI KHANDELWAL • Division of Biological Standardization, ICAR-Indian Veterinary
Research Institute, Bareilly, UP, India
S
ANWEER KHATOON
Department of Veterinary Parasitology, CVAS, RAJUVAS, Navania,
•
Rajasthan, India
S. S
IMRAN KOUR
Department of Veterinary Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of
•
Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, DUVASU, Mathura, UP, India
A
NIL KUMAR
Department of Zoology, Baba Raghav Das Post Graduate College, Deoria,
•
UP, India
M
ANJULENDRA KUMAR
Department of Zoology, Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University,
•
Lucknow, UP, India
N
AVE EN KUMAR
P
RADEEP KUMAR
Apollo College of Veterinary Medicine, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
•
Division of Veterinary Biotechnology, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research
•
Institute, Izatnagar, Uttar Pradesh, India
S
UDHIR KUMAR
Department of Zoology, Baba Raghav Das Post Graduate College, Deoria,
•
UP, India
V
IJAY KUMAR
Department of Animal Genetics and Breeding, DUVASU, Mathura, Uttar
•
Pradesh, India
R
EDDI LOKESWARI
Department of Veterinary Microbiology, ICAR-Indian Veterinary
•
Research Institute (ICAR-IVRI), Izatnagar, Bareilly, UP, India
M
ILINDMITRA K. LONARE
Department of Veterinary Pharmacology and Toxicology, COVS,
•
GADVASU, Rampura Phul, Punjab, India
B
AVADHARANI MANI
ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute (ICAR-IVRI), Hebbal,
•
Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
M
ANISHA
OUNIL MANKAD
M
Division of Animal Physiology, ICAR-NDRI, Karnal, Haryana, India
•
Department of Nano Biotechnology, Anand Agricultural University,
•
Anand, Gujarat, India
M
AMTA MEENA
Division of Pharmacology and Toxicology, ICAR-Indian Veterinary
•
Research Institute, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India
D
UMALA NAVEEN
Department of Veterinary Microbiology, ICAR-Indian Veterinary
•
Research Institute (ICAR-IVRI), Izatnagar, Bareilly, U.P., India
A
NURADHA NEMA
Assistant Professor, Department of Veterinary Surgery & Radiology,
•
CVSc & AH, Rewa, NDVSU, MP, India
P
RITAM PAL
Division of Animal Genetics and Breeding, ICAR-NDRI, Karnal, Haryana,
•
India
S
ANTANU PAL
Department of Veterinary Microbiology, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research
•
Institute (ICAR-IVRI), Izatnagar, Bareilly, U.P., India
D
ISHA PANT
Department of Veterinary Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Veterinary
•
and Animal Sciences, GB Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar,
Uttarakhand, India
K
AMAL PANT
A
BHISHEK PATHAK
Veterinarian, Government of Uttarakhand, Didihaat, Uttarakhand, India
•
Department of Veterinary Pharmacology and Toxicology, Apollo College
•
of Veterinary Medicine, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
P
OOJA
P
RADEEP KUMAR RAM
S
IVARAMAN RAMANARAYANAN
Department of Animal Genetics and Breeding, DUVASU, Mathura, U.P., India
•
APRI, DRPCAU, Pusa, Samastipur, Bihar, India
•
Department of Veterinary Pharmacology and Toxicology,
•
COVS, Kishanganj, BASU, Patna, Bihar, India
M
ATUKUMALLI USHA RANI
Veterinary Pharmacology & Toxicology, PV Narsimha Rao
•
Telangana Veterinary University, Hyderabad, Telangana, India

Contributors xi
ROSHNI • Livestock Product Technology, NTR College of Veterinary Science, Gannavaram,
Andhra Pradesh, India
J
ADAV SARMA
Department of Veterinary Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Veterinary
•
Science, Assam Agricultural University, Khanapara, Guwahati, India
L
IPIKA SARMA
Department of Veterinary Physiology, College of Veterinary Science, Assam
•
Agricultural University, Khanapara, Guwahati, Assam, India
S
ONAL SAXENA
Division of Veterinary Biotechnology, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research
•
Institute, Izatnagar, Uttar Pradesh, India
M
ANJINDER SHARMA
Department of Veterinary Physiology and Biochemistry, COVS, Guru
•
Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
M
EEMANSHA SHARMA
Division of Pharmacology and Toxicology, ICAR-Indian Veterinary
•
Research Institute, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India
P
ABBATHI SHIVAKUMAR
Veterinary Pharmacology & Toxicology, PV Narsimha Rao
•
Telangana Veterinary University, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
S
AMEER SHRIVASTAVA
Division of Veterinary Biotechnology, ICAR-Indian Veterinary
•
Research Institute, Izatnagar, Uttar Pradesh, India
S
HVETA SINGH
Department of Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Science, Assam
•
Agricultural University, Khanapara, Guwahati, Assam, India
T
HAKUR UTTAM SINGH
Division of Pharmacology and Toxicology, ICAR-Indian Veterinary
•
Research Institute, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India
N
ABANEETA SMARAKI
CADRAD, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar,
•
Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India
T
EJPAL
Department of Veterinary Microbiology, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research
•
Institute (ICAR-IVRI), Izatnagar, Bareilly, U.P., India
P
ANKAJ KUMAR UMAR
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Nanaji Deshmukh
•
Veterinary Science University, Jabalpur, MP, India
V
ISHWA RANJAN UPADHYAY
Division of Animal Physiology and Reproduction, ICAR-
•
NRCC, Bikaner, Rajasthan, India
S
ANJAY VAGHELA
College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Kamdhenu
•
University, Anand, Gujarat, India
A
YUSHI VAIDHYA
Division of Pharmacology and Toxicology, ICAR-Indian Veterinary
•
Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India
R
AJESH SUDHAKAR WAKCHAURE
RATIBHA YADAV
P
V
ISHAL YADAV
Mata Jijabai Govt PG Girls College, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India
•
Animal Reproduction, Gynaecology and Obstetrics, ICAR-National Dairy
•
Veterinary Polytechnic, Jagdalpur, Chhattisgarh, India
•
Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana, India

Chapter 1
Introduction to Drug Deliver y System: Past, Present,
and Future Perspectives
Santanu Pal, Dumala Naveen, Tejpal, and Swarup Debroy
Abstract
Recent advancements in molecular pharmacology and a deepened understanding of disease mechanisms
have emphasized the need to precisely target specific cells responsible for disease onset and progression to
prevent side effects and minimize systemic exposure. Drug delivery (DD) involves the strategies, formulations, technologies, and procedures employed to transport a pharmaceutical substance within the body of
both humans and animals to produce the intended therapeutic outcome. The most frequently used delivery
methods include topical (applied to the skin), transmucosal (such as nasal, buccal, sublingual, vaginal,
ocular, and rectal), and inhalation routes. Traditional dosage forms release the drug rapidly, which can lead
to variations in blood drug levels depending on the form of dosage. Current drug delivery systems (DDS)
leverage cutting-edge technology to expedite the delivery of drugs systemically to specific target sites,
thereby maximizing therapeutic efficacy while minimizing unintended accumulation in the body. Consequently, they play a pivotal role in disease management and treatment. Modern DDS present distinct
advantages over conventional delivery systems, owing to their superior performance, automation, precision,
and effectiveness. Utilizing nanomaterials or small-scale devices with multifunctional components, these
systems are characterized by biocompatibility, biodegradability, and high viscoelasticity, resulting in prolonged circulating half-lives. This chapter offers a comprehensive overview of drug delivery systems’
historical progression and technological evolution. It also delves into recent developments in DDS, their
therapeutic applications, challenges in their use, and potential future improvements for enhanced performance and utilization.
Key words Molecular pharmacology, Drug delivery, Therapeutic outcome, Nanomaterials
1 Introduction
Drug delivery involves the process or strategy of administering
pharmaceutical substances to elicit therapeutic effects in humans
or animals. It encompasses a variety of techniques and technologies
aimed at safely and effectively transporting drugs to their intended
site of action within the body. This can include methods such as oral
ingestion, injections, patches, or controlled-release formulations.
The primary goal of drug delivery is to optimize the efficacy, safety,
1

2 Santanu Pal et al.
Table 1
Progression of controlled drug delivery systems from the year 1950 onward [
Sl.
Generation of drug
No.
delivery systems
1. First generation Conventional dosage Capsule, tablet, emulsion,
2. Second generation Modified action systems Enteric coating, repeat/prolong
3. Third generation Controlled delivery systems Osmotically, swelling and diffusion
4. Fourth generation Targeted delivery systems Targeted, modulated, self-regulated
Properties Dosage forms
suspension
action
controlled systems
delivery systems
1]
5. Fifth generation Long-term delivery systems
(6–12 months)
and patient compliance of pharmaceutical treatments. Utilizing an
advanced drug delivery system (ADDS) can rejuvenate an existing
drug molecule, breathing new life into its therapeutic potential
1
[
he slow but steady enhancement in effectively treating severe
]. T
illnesses
approach
tuents
istics
underscores a growing
delivering
of
to
the
medication
medications
deter
and are accountable for the alterations it induces in the body
when ingested. The progress in pharmacology and pharmacokinetics has underscored the significance of drug release in determining
therapeutic efficacy, leading to the emergence of the controlled
release concept. The approval of controlled-release formulations
of drugs initially occurred in the 1950s, sparking notable
because of their considerable advantages over traditional medications (Table
1). These formulations release drugs at a predeter-
mined rate and duration. Moreover, controlled drug delivery
systems remain unaffected by physiological conditions, allowing
them to sustain drug release for extended periods
days to years (Fig.
1) [2]. Traditional approaches are constrained by
factors such as the inadequate solubility of drugs, lack of specificity,
and undesirable release characteristics.
Novel drug delivery systems (NDDS) offer solutions to common issues associated with traditional dosage forms, including high
dosage with low availability, instability, the first-pass effect, fluctuating plasma drug levels, and rapid release of medicinal products.
Through improved performance, protection, patient compliance,
and extended product shelf life, NDDS aims to alleviate these
problems. Nanoparticles find applications across various fields and
are produced through diverse processes. Currently, 95% of experimental drugs exhibit inadequate pharmacokinetic and
Nanorobots, g
biologicals
necessity
to
its
mine
herapy,
ene t
for a multidisciplinar
specific
tissues.
physicochemical
ranging from
consti-
The
character
interest
y
-

Introduction to Drug Delivery System: Past, Present, and Future Perspectives 3
Fig. 1 The efficacy of drugs remains intact if their concentration in the blood
exceeds the minimum effective level, irrespective of variations in pharmacokinetic profiles
biopharmaceutical properties. As a result, it’s imperative to establish medication distribution schemes that specifically target affected
sites without causing harm to healthy tissues. This approach aims to
disperse therapeutic drug molecules ef fectively, reducing required
dosage levels and enhancing therapeutic effectiveness and safety
profiles in novel therapies [
technology trace
back to 1952 when the Spansule® sustained-
3
]. The origins of modern drug delivery
release capsule technology was introduced. This innovation allows
for the gradual release of a drug over 12 hours following oral
administration, achieved by an initial immediate dose followed by
a gradual release of the remaining medication. Before the 1980s,
oral and transdermal formulations were the primary methods for
delivering small-molecule drugs, providing the
ing up
to 24 hours. However, the landscape changed with the
rapeutic effects last-
introduction of Lupron Depot® in 1989, marking the emergence
of long-acting injectable and implantable formulations. These
innovations extended drug delivery durations from days to months,
and in some cases, even years. Notably, these advancements facilitated the long-term delivery of peptide and protein drugs, albeit
restricted to parenteral administration [
PEGylated protein,
Adagen®, in 1990 heralded the onset of the
4]. The advent of the first
PEGylation era. This led to the development of Doxil® (doxorubicin in PEGylated liposome) in 1995, Movantik® (PEGylated
naloxone—naloxegol) in 2014, and Onpattro® (Patisiran—
siRNA in PEGylated lipid nanoparticle) in 2018 [
4]. Both Mylo-
targ™ (an antibody-drug conjugate containing gemtuzumab

4 Santanu Pal et al.
ozogamicin) and Rapamune® (a nanocrystal formulation of sirolimus) were introduced in the year 2000 [
2 The Initial Phase of Drug Delivery Systems
During ancient times, reliance on medicinal plants was common.
While these plants offered benefits, they lacked uniformity, consistency, and precision in drug delivery. Before the adoption of controlled drug delivery methods, pharmaceuticals were typically
manufactured and preserved in pill or capsule for ms. Upon ingestion, these formulations dissolved upon contact with gastrointestinal fluids passed through the intestinal wall and were subsequently
absorbed into the bloodstream via blood capillaries. However,
during this period, there was no capability to regulate the kinetics
of drug release. Several systems incorporating polymers were available, with waxes frequently included alongside drugs to prolong
their mechanisms of action or enhance specific features such as
targeting particular sites. The conventional drug delivery system
consists of cream, ointment, paste, tablets, capsules, pills, solution,
mixture, tinctures, emulsion, suspension, granules, powders,
snuffs, inhalations, aerosols, liniments, lotions, paints, and suppositories, etc. (Fig.
Creams are semi-solid dosage forms known for their soft texture and ease of spreading. They typically consist of over 20% water
and volatile substances, with less than 50% hydrocarbons like waxes
or polyols serving as the base for the drugs. Cream bases are
emulsions categorized into two types: oil-in-water (O/W) creams
2).
4].
Fig. 2 Schematic diagram outlining the available conventional dosage forms

Introduction to Drug Delivery System: Past, Present, and Future Perspectives 5
and water-in-oil (W/O) creams. Oil-in-water (O/W) creams are
composed of tiny oil globules dispersed within a continuous aqueous phase, stabilized by surfactants.
Ointments are semi-solid formulations primarily composed of
oil-based substances, with the base typically being anhydrous and
not mixing with skin secretions. They contain less than 20% water
and volatile substances, with over 50% hydrocarbons (such as waxes
or polyols) serving as the vehicle. This composition results in ointments having a prolonged retention time but lower spreadability.
Paste is essentially an ointment with a higher concentration of
insoluble solids incorporated. The addition of a significant amount
of particulate matter leads to increased stiffness of the formulation.
Compared to ointments, pastes exhibit reduced permeability, less
risk of maceration, and lower heat. Upon application to the skin,
pastes form an effective protective barrier.
Tablets are a solid form of medication that is produced through
compression and wet/dry granulation, resulting in various shapes
such as round, oval, or square. To facilitate effective tableting,
excipients like binders, glidants, and lubricants are commonly
included. Additionally, disintegrants are added to promote the
rapid breakdown of tablets within the digestive system.
Capsules are another form of a solid dosage in which the drug
ingredients are enclosed within a soluble shell. Capsules serve to
conceal the unpleasant taste of their contents and typically exhibit
limited interaction between the drug and excipients. There are two
main types of capsules: Hard-shelled capsules, primarily utilized for
encapsulating dry, powdered components, and soft-shelled capsules, mainly employed for hydrophobic drugs and oily active substances that are either suspended or dissolved in oil.
Pills are solid single-dose forms created by compressing active
pharmaceutical ingredients (API) together with adhesives and
other additives into rounded masses intended for oral
administration.
A s
uppository i
s a small, rounded, or cone-shaped semi-solid
medication form inserted into a bodily opening such as the rectum
or vagina. It dissolves or melts within the body to release the drug,
providing either local or systemic therapeutic effects. Suppositories
typically consist of natural fats like cocoa butter or synthetic compounds like polyethylene glycol (Carbowax), with glycerol serving
as a primary excipient. They are specifically designed for rectal
insertion and offer a rapid onset of action due to the highly vascularized nature of the rectum. Additionally, they bypass the hepatic
first-pass metabolism.
Oral solutions
are clear liquid formulations intended for oral
administration, consisting of one or more active ingredients dissolved in an appropriate solvent system. Oral emulsions are liquid
formulations designed for oral administration, featuring a biphasic
composition where the drug is contained within an oil-in-water

6 Santanu Pal et al.
emulsion, present in either single or dual phases. Oral suspensions
are liquid dosage forms intended for oral administration, consisting
of one or more active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) suspended
within a suitable solvent. Although they tend to settle over time,
they can be easily redispersed by shaking to achieve a uniform
suspension. This suspension remains stable enough to ensure accurate dosing. Syrup refers to a concentrated solution of sugar, typica
lly sucrose, in water, within which active pharmaceutical
ingredients (APIs) are
useful for masking the unpleasant taste of medications. An elixir is a
clear liquid intended for oral administration, primarily used for
delivering potent or nauseating drugs by incorporating pleasant
flavors. The formulation includes a significant proportion of ethanol or sucrose as the vehicle, along with antimicrobial preservatives
to
improve stability.
In 1951, Lipowski pioneered a patented oral sustained-release
formulation. He coated pills with enteric polymers (such as beads),
layering the drug and coating alternately. This method resulted in a
slow, consistent, and periodic release of the drug [
Jatzkewitz reported the first therapeutic nanoparticle by preparing
the initial polymer-drug conjugate [
a rapid development of site-specific drug delivery systems, with
continuous updates to strategies, encompassing advancements
such as liposomes (including immunoliposomes and magnetoliposomes), nanoparticles (including magnetic nanoparticles and polymeric nanoparticles), sophisticated polymers (such as dendrimers),
and viral vectors [
dissolved. Flavored syrups are particularly
2]. In 1955,
2]. Following 1970, there was
5].
3 Recent Drug Delivery Systems
In recent years, considerable advancements have been achieved in
the development of drug delivery systems utilizing organic, inorganic, and hybrid nanoparticles as carriers for targeted drug delivery, especially in chemotherapy (Fig.
delivery systems are designed with enhanced characteristics such
as reduced particle size, improved permeability, enhanced solubility, efficacy, precise targeting, stability, decreased toxicity, and prolonged release. A novel drug delivery system (NDDS) encompasses
methods, formulations, technologies, and systems designed to
effectively transport a pharmaceutical substance within the body,
ensuring its safe delivery to achieve the intended therapeutic outcomes [
and biochemical mechanisms. Physical mechanisms, known as controlled drug delivery systems, involve processes such as osmosis,
diffusion, erosion, dissolution, and electron transport. Biochemical
mechanisms consist of monoclonal antibodies, gene therapy, vector
systems, polymer-drug conjugates, and liposomes. Drug carriers
6]. Novel drug delivery systems encompass both physical
These modern drug
3).

Introduction to Drug Delivery System: Past, Present, and Future Perspectives 7
Fig. 3 Various recent drug delivery systems designed for diverse therapeutic
objectives
encompass a variety of options including soluble polymers, microparticles constructed from insoluble or biodegradable natural and
synthetic polymers, microcapsules, cells, cell ghosts, lipoproteins,
liposomes, and micelles. These carriers can be designed to degrade
slowly, respond to stimuli such as pH or temperature changes, and
even be targeted by attaching specific antibodies against characteristic components of the desired area within the body.
4 Drug Delivery via Carriers
Carriers play a crucial role in achieving targeted drug delivery by
serving as essential molecules or systems necessary for effectively
transporting the loaded drug to specific sites within the body. These
engineered vectors are designed to retain the drug either through
encapsulation or by using spacer molecules, and subsequently
transport or deliver it to the vicinity of the target cell. Several
drug delivery systems rely on carriers, including microspheres and
microcapsules, nanoparticles, monoclonal antibodies, prodrugs,
resealed erythrocytes, artificial cells, neutrophils, and vesicular
carriers.
In recent
for drug delivery. Lipid vesicles have proven to be valuable tools in
times, vesicles have emerged as the preferred method

8 Santanu Pal et al.
Table 2
Variations among nanosomal vesicular carriers are outlined [
17]
Sl.
Nanosome Main component Uses Special properties
No.
1. Niosomes Cholesterol, charge-inducing
substances, nonionic
surfactants
2. Liposomes Phospholipids dispersed in
aqueous solution
3. Transferosomes Surfactants, a little alcohol, dye,
and phosphatidylcholine in
buffer solution
4. Ethosomes High concentration of alcohol,
phospholipid, water,
cholesterol, dye
immunology, membrane biology, diagnostic methods, and more
recently, genetic engineering. Vesicles are instrumental in modeling
biological membranes and facilitating the transport and targeted
delivery of active agents. Vesicular drug delivery systems include
phytosomes, aquasomes, liposomes, sphinosomes, transferosomes,
niosomes, ethosomes, and phytosomes (Table
Phytosomes represent a novel drug delivery system where the
hydrophilic bioactive components of herbs are encapsulated and
surrounded by phospholipids. This complex resembles a miniature
cell, leading to improved pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic
properties compared to traditional herbal extracts, ultimately
resulting in enhanced bioavailability. The binding of botanical
extracts with phospholipids enhances their absorption in the intestinal tract, thereby increasing their bioavailability.
Aquasomes represent
designed for transporting bioactive molecules, including peptides,
proteins, hormones, antigens, and genes, to specific targeted sites.
These spherical structures typically range from 60 to 300 nanometers in size. Unlike conventional nanoparticles, aquasomes are
three-layered self-assembled structures. They consist of a solid
nanocrystalline core surrounded by an oligomeric film, onto
which biochemically active molecules can be adsorbed with or
without modification. These structures form through
non-covalent and ionic bonds. The solid core provides structural
stability, while the carbohydrate coating prevents dehydration and
stabilizes the bioactive molecules. Aquasomes have demonstrated
efficacy in delivering substances such as insulin, hemoglobin, and
enzymes like serration peptidase.
Carrier of lipophilic and
amphiphilic drugs
Used in targeted oral,
topical, and pulmonary
DD
Penetrate deeper
epidermis layers, used
for transdermal delivery
Controlled transdermal
delivery
Stable, no need for
special storage or
preparation
Unstable, needs
special storage
and preparation
Ultra flexible and
deformable
vesicles
Soft and novel
vesicles
2).
a recent advancement in delivery systems
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
