Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5919_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
15.09.2026
Размер:
15 Мб
Скачать
☆
Biosensor-Based Drug Delivery Systems: Innovations, Applications, and… 249
30. Martinkova P, Kostelnik A, Valek T, Pohanka (2017) Main streams in the construction of
M biosensors and their applications. Int J Electro­chem Sci 12:7386–7403
31. Nguyen HH, Kim M (2017) An
overview of techniques in enzyme immobilization. Appl Sci Converg Technol 26:157–163
32. Sassolas A, Blum LJ, Leca-Bouvier BD (2012) Immobilization
strategies to develop enzy-
matic biosensors. Biotechnol Adv 30:489–511
33. Sneha HP, Beulah KC, Murthy PS (2019) Enzyme
immobilization methods and applica­tions in the food industry. In: Kuddus M (ed) Enzymes in food biotechnology, 1st edn. Academic, London, pp 645–658
34. Malhotra BD, Ali MA (2017) Nanomaterials in biosensors:
fundamentals and applications. In: Malhotra BD, Ali MA (eds) Nanomaterials for biosensors, 1st edn. Elsevier, Cambridge, MA, pp 1–73
35. Shanker A, Lee K, Kim J (2014) Synthetic hybrid
biosensors. In: Meyers RA (ed) Encyclopedia of molecular cell biology and molecular medicine, 2nd edn. Wiley­VCH Verlag Gmbh & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, pp 1–36
36.
Grieshaber D, MacKenzie R, Janos Vo¨ro¨s J , Reimhult E (2008) Electrochemical biosensors—sensor principles and architec­tures. Sensors 8:1400– 1458
37. Bollella P, Schulz C, Favero G, Mazzei F, Ludwig R, Gorton L, Antiochia R (2017) Green synthesis and characterization of gold and silver nanoparticles and their application
for development of a third generation lactose biosensor
. Electroanalysis 29:77–86
38. Santhosh A, Theertha V, Prakash P, Smitha Chandran S
(2021) From waste to a value added product: green synthesis of silver nano­particles from onion peels together with its diverse applications. Mater Today Proc 46: 4460–4463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
matpr.2020.09.680
39. Zamarchi F, Vieira IC (2021) Determination paracetamol using a sensor based on green
of synthesis of silver nanoparticles in plant extract. J Pharm Biomed Anal 196:113912. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2021.113912
40. Tian Y, Chengnan X, Juan Qiao LQ, Zhang R
(2019)
Green synthesis of gold nanoclusters using papaya juice for detection of L-lysine. Chin Chem Lett 30:660–663
41. Chen Y, Qiao J, Liu Q, Zhang M, Qi L (2018) Fluorescence
turn-on assay for detection of serum D-penicillamine based on papai­n@AuNCs-Cu2þ complex. Anal Chim Acta 1026:133–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
aca.2018.04.014
42. Singh P, Singh Kshitji RB, Singh Jay SRP (2021)
Biogenic synthesis of copper oxide nanoparticles: characterization and biosensing applications, SPAST Abstr
43. Sukumar S, Ru
drasenan A, Padmanabhan Nambiar D (2020) Green-synthesized rice­shaped copper oxide nanoparticles using Cae­salpinia bonducella seed extract and their applications. ACS Omega 5:1040–1051.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.9b02857
Chapter 12
Ocular Drug Delivery: Overcoming Barriers for Effective Treatment
Anuradha Nema
Abstract
Eye is a complex organ responsible for vision with its unique anatomy and physiology. Conventional routes for ocular drug delivery include topical, subconjunctival, intracameral, intravitreal, transscleral, retrobulbar, and systemic. Among them, topical route is one of the preferred routes due to its non-invasiveness, safety, and high patient compliance. However, presence of various anatomical and physiological ocular barriers creates hindrance in active absorption and activity of therapeutic drugs to treat ocular diseases by any route. To overcome various ocular barriers and improve drug bioavailability, development of nanotechnology­based ocular drug delivery system (ODDS) is advantageous. Ocular treatment is achieving the higher level with several advantages due to advancement in nanocarriers. Nanostructured platforms have several positive outcomes, including overcoming ocular barriers, increasing transcorneal permeability, lengthening drug residence time, reducing drug degradation, decreasing dosing frequency, achieving sustained release, improving patient compliance, drug targeting, and gene delivery. Many nanocarriers, such as nanoparticles, nanosuspensions, nanomicelles, nanofibers, nanoemulsions, liposomes, etc., have proven excellent delivery potential in both in-vitro and in-vivo studies, enhancing drug permeability across the ocular barriers and increasing drug bioavailability in the eye. In future, more innovations are needed to achieve greater results in management of ocular diseases.
Key words Drug targeting, Gene delivery, Nanocarriers, Nanotechnology, Ocular barriers, Ocular drug delivery system, Residence time, Transcorneal permeability

1 Introduction

Vision, a complex and multipart process, gives a sense of sight and is accomplished by a highly complex sense organ, the eye. Eye is the only organ to directly observe nervous system (optic nerve) and peripheral vasculature (retinal arterioles and venules) and thus is helpful in diagnosing various systemic diseases [ anatomy and physiology offer eye with challenges for drug delivery to targeted sites. Anatomically, it is divided into anterior and poste­rior segments [
2]. Both segments of eye are vulnerable to a variety
of diseases either due to local cause or systemic problems, causing
251
1]. Complicated
252 Anuradha Nema
visual impairment. Structurally and functionally, ophthalmic tissues are protected by certain dynamic and static protective barriers
3]. These barriers are precorneal barriers, corneal barrier and
[ blood-ocular barriers. Tear film, reflex blinking, eyelid, conjunctiva, cornea, and nasolacrimal drainage prevent the eye surface from foreign substances [
4]. Blood-ocular barriers include the blood-
aqueous barrier (BAB) in the anterior segment and blood-retinal barrier (BRB) in the posterior segment of eye that prevent the to­and-fro movement of etiological agents between eye and blood circulation [ it
still
is
. Although eye has multiple protective mechanisms,
5]
vulnerable to infection, trauma, and other diseases. Cata­ract, glaucoma, diabetic retinopathy, keratitis, uveitis, etc. can cause vision impairment, and their adequate treatment is of utmost importance to improve quality of life [
6]. Medicinal treatment is
the primary treatment for most of eye diseases. Delivering drugs to target eye tissues at the desired therapeutic concentration without affecting other unaffected tissues is of prime concern [ protective barriers,
which are considered as boon for eye protection
7]. Besides,
on one hand, serve as hindrance in ocular therapy on the other hand.
To achieve therapeutic effects, medications are either applied topically, delivered subconjunctivaly, intraocularly (intracameral or intravitreal), periocularly (subtenon, retrobulbar, or juxtascleral), or systemically [
8]. Ocular barriers create a substantial challenge in
treating ocular problems in relation to attainment at the desired site and residing there for an appropriate duration. As a consequence, bioavailability of medications is often less than 5% [
For a
ffective therapeutics, ocular drug delivery systems
n e
9].
(ODDS) are designed so as to: (a) deliver drugs to target ocular tissues by overcoming ocular barriers, (b) enhance drug stability and treatment efficiency, (c) lengthen drug retention time and decrease dosing frequency, (d) facilitate multiple drug combina­tions, and (e) increase patient compliance and diminish drug­related side effects [
Ocular medications
10].
used are either in liquid (drops, suspen­sion, and emulsion), solid (powder, insert, contact lens), semi-solid (gels and ointments), or mixed (in-situ gel) form. Among all, eye drops are the commonest form of medications used. But they are limited mostly to deliver the medications into the anterior part of
11].
eye and have short residence time [
For a drug to be effective, it must reach and preserve an acceptable drug concentration with minimum quantity of active therapeutic component. It is achieved by appropriate corneal penetration along with effective precorneal residence time. To overcome all ocular therapeutic challenges, innovative nanotechnology is evidencing dynamic progress in the field of ocular drug delivery. These technologies are providing new ophthalmic therapeutic interferences by overcoming ocular obsta­cles, reducing drug degradation, increasing dr ug residence time,
2 Eye’s Anatomy
Ocular Drug Delivery: Overcoming Barriers for Effective Treatment 253
enhancing trans-corneal permeation across barriers, and reducing dosing frequency. Nanosystems with numerous advantages are to the next level as compared to traditional drug administration by improving patient compliance, achieving sustained and controlled release, drug targeting, and gene delivery [
12]. Nanocarriers, such
as nanoemulsions (NEs), nanomicelles, microemulsions, nanopar­ticles (NPs), nanofibers, dendrimers, liposomes, nanowafers, microneedles (MNs), etc., are effective in therapy of anterior and posterior ocular diseases. Gene therapy, exosome, and self-nano­emulsifying drug delivery systems (SNEDDS) are emerging as potential tools in ocular drug delivery [ ophthalmic treatment, a novel
non-invasive ODDS is important to
13]. Hence, for effective
overcome ocular barriers, sustained drug release, and its maintained effective drug concentrations at the targeted site.
Anatomically eye is divided into anterior and posterior segments. Anterior segment includes tear film, cornea, pupil, conjunctiva, iris, ciliary body, aqueous humor, and lens, while the posterior segment is composed of sclera, choroid, vitreous body, retina, and optic nerve. Anatomy of eye is demonstrated in Fig.
1. Quantity and
Fig. 1 Anatomy of the eye. (1) Anterior segment; (2) posterior segment; (3) tear film; (4) sclera; (5) eyelid; (6) cornea; (7) anterior chamber; (8) iris; (9) pupil; (10) lens; (11) vitreous body; (12) retina; (13) optic nerve; (14) blood vessels; (15) choroid
254 Anuradha Nema
quality of tear film are controlled by orbital glands. Cornea is composed of five layers, epithelium, bowman’s membrane, stroma, descemet’s membrane, and endothelium. It is known as a lipid­aqueous-lipid sandwich, where stroma (hydrophilic) is sandwiched between epithelium and endothelium. Transparency of cornea is preserved by endothelium [ mucous membrane, is divided into palpebral
5
]. Conjunctiva, a delicate transparent
and bulbar conjunc­tiva. It is composed of epithelium, substantia propria enclosing nerves, lymphatic and blood vessels, and submucosa layer. Iris, the pigmented portion of eye, regulates the quantity of light penetrating the eye through control of pupil size. Ciliary body is composed of pigmented and non-pigmented epithelium, stroma, and muscles. Capillaries of ciliary body is res cation between anterior and posterior segments.
ponsible for communi-
Transparent lens focuses the light onto retina. Vitreous humor, a gel-like, clear, avascular tissue, maintains the shape of eye. It is made of 99.9% water, hyaluronic acid, and collagen. Sclera is made of collagen and mucopolysaccharides. Choroid, situated between sclera and retina, is a vascular layer. The retina is composed of neural and glial cells that produces electrical impulses and deliver brain [
11].
them via optic nerve to

3 Ocular Barriers Hindering Absorption of Drugs

Static and dynamic absorption barriers in eye prevent extraneous substances, including therapeutic agents, from reaching to targeted sites. Dynamic barriers principally include tear film, tear turnover, nasolacrimal duct drainage, conjunctival and choroidal blood flow, and lymphatic clearance. Cornea, conjunctiva, sclera, vitreous body, BAB, and BRB form static barriers of eye. Barriers can also be stated as precorneal, corneal, and blood-ocular barriers. Various ocular barriers are depicted in Fig. various ocular therapeutic drugs, thereby reducing their bioavailability [14].

3.1 Precorneal Barriers

3.1.1 Tear Film, Tear Turnover, and Nasolacrimal Duct Drainage
Tear film, eyelids and their reflex blinking, conjunctiva, and naso­lacrimal drainage prevent foreign substances away from the eye surface. It prevents drugs from reaching the cornea and other ocular tissues. Variations in capacity of cul-de-sac also affects thera­peutic drug concentration in eye.
A thin, transparent tear film is composed of an outer lipid layer, middle aqueous layer, and inner mucin layer. Negatively charged mucin layer protect the eye surface from harmful molecules and infections through electrostatic forces. The aqueous and lipid layers act as barriers for lipophilic and lipophobic drugs, respectively
15]. The non-specific binding of drugs to tear enzymes and
[
2. All barriers limit absorption of
Fig. 2 Ocular barriers
Ocular Drug Delivery: Overcoming Barriers for Effective Treatment 255
proteins also obstruct drug absorption and entry through cornea and anterior chamber. Additionally, after topical application of drugs tear turnover increases, resulting in rapid removal of drug through nasolacrimal drainage (1–2 minutes). This drainage is a major barrier in the precorneal region [
16]. In view of maintaining
effective drug concentration, residence time of the drug must be attained by different mechanisms.
3.1.2 Capacity of Cul-de­sac
3.1.3 Conjunctival and Scleral Barriers
Cul-de-sac, a shallow pocket in the lower eyelid where palpebral and bulbar conjunctiva meet, has a maximum capacity of approxi­mately 30 μL [
17]. In inflammatory and allergic conditions of eye,
capacity of cul-de-sac is further minimized. The low capacity of cul­de-sac reduces the residence time and concentration of the drug in eye, thereby reducing its therapeutic effects.
After topical administration, the non-corneal alternative route of drug entry is through conjunctiva and sclera. Conjunctival mucous membrane is formed by epithelium and stromal layer. It produces and maintains tear film and protects the eye from external patho­gens. Conjunctival surface area is approximately 17 times greater than that of cornea. Hence, it is more permeable than the cornea for absorption of macromolecules and hydrophilic compounds
18]. Additionally, being highly vascularized medicines remain
[ localized for shorter duration and systemically absorbed to be distributed throughout the body. This non-productive huge drug loss into the systemic circulation reduces ocular region bioavailabil­ity. To overcome this loss and to enhance drug efficacy, high
256 Anuradha Nema
concentrations with repeated instillations of drug are required [
19]. However, in this way, patient compliance is negatively influ-
enced and possibility of side effects is increased.
After permeation from conjunctiva, drug travels through trans­scleral route from sclera to anterior segment. Sclera, the white part of eye is an opaque, hard sheath and is relatively more permeable with larger surface area than cornea. The scleral penetration of drug is mainly determined by the size of drug and scleral thickness. Drug spread across the sclera through perivascular space and between scleral fibrils, to reach the choroid and retina [
20].

3.2 Corneal Barrier

3.3 Blood-Ocular Barriers

Cornea, the outermost clear, avascular layer, protects eye from diverse chemical and mechanical injuries. It is composed of epithe­lium, stroma, and endothelium and poses a significant challenge for ocular rug delivery. Only small and lipophilic drugs can pass through epithelium, whereas stroma permits hydrophilic drugs. Besides, the presence of cytochrome P450 (drug-degrading enzymes) and drug efflux pumps in epithelium are responsible for low drug bioavailability. Endothelium, due to its hydrophobic nature, restricts the penetration of hydrophilic drug and macro­molecules into aqueous humor. Thus, trans-corneal permeation is rate-limiting step for drug transfer from lacrimal fluid into aqueous humor that depends on drug molecular weight, hydrophobicity charge, and degree of ionization [
21].
These barriers prevent the non-specific entry of foreign compounds into the blood stream and are classified as blood-aqueous bar rier (BAB) in anterior segment and blood-retinal barrier (BRB) in posterior segment of eye. Additionally, they limit the entry of compounds into the eye from systemic circulation. The blood­aqueous barrier consists of non-pigmented ciliary body of iris vas­culature and epithelial tissue of the endothelial cells. The perme­ability of drugs across BAB is determined by the osmotic pressure and physicochemical properties of therapeutic agents. Lipophilic and small-molecule drugs can permeate more rapidly through bar­rier than hydrophilic and large-molecule drugs. This specialized tissue barrier creates a challenge for ocular drug delivery and hin-
.
ders therapeutic efficacy [
The blood-retinal
22]
barrier is the most important barrier in pos­terior part of eye and comprises of internal and external compo­nents. The inner BRB is formed by tight junctions between retinal capillary endothelial cells, while close junctions between retinal pigment epithelial cells forms outer BRB. It prevents entry of plasma components, drugs, and toxic substances into retina. Hence, BRB is essential to maintain normal visual function [
23].
Ocular Drug Delivery: Overcoming Barriers for Effective Treatment 257

4 Various Routes for Ocular Drug Delivery

Conventional routes of ocular drug administration primarily include topical, conjunctival and scleral, intracameral, intravitreal, retrobulbar, and systemic routes. Figure routes for ocular drug delivery. Table of ocular drug administration with their advantages, challenges encountered, and applications. Drug administration done by any route has to bypass one or more ocular barriers to reach the targeted site. Table with their preferred route of administration and uses.
2 demonstrates some common ocular drugs
3 demonstrates various
1 summarizes various routes

4.1 Topical Administration

Topical administration is the commonest and easiest non-invasive route of ocular drug administration. It represents more than 95% of commercially available ocular products but with low bioavailability (<5%). As compared to other routes of administration, it has the advantages of (a) being non-invasive, (b) relative ease of drug administration, and (c) minimum systemic side effects of drug. Hence, ophthalmic solutions are the foremost choice for many anterior segment eye diseases management, such as dry eye, inflam­mation, infection, allergy, and glaucoma [
24]. But, due to insuffi-
cient corneal permeation and short residence time, bioavailability is low. Furthermore, bioavailability is reduced by tear drainage, reflex blinking, and non-productive absorption to systemic circulation through conjunctiva and nasolacrimal region. To overcome this
Fig. 3 Routes for ocular drug delivery. (1) Topical; (2) intracameral; (3) subcon­junctival; (4) transscleral; (5) intravitreal; (6) retrobulbar; (7) systemic (oral or parenteral)
258 Anuradha Nema
Table 1 Various routes of ocular drug administration, their advantages, disadvantages/challenges, and their applications
Route of drug
S. No.
administration
1 Topical Non-invasive, self-
2 Intracameral Provides high anterior
3 Subconjunctival Site for depot
4 Transscleral Bypasses anterior segment
Advantages
administrable with high patient compliance, minimum systemic side effects
chamber drug concentration, eliminates usage of topical drops, avoids corneal, conjunctival and BAB barriers, reduces corneal and systemic side effects seen with topical steroid therapy
formulations to deliver drugs to anterior and posterior segment, avoids corneal and BAB
barriers, large sized molecules can pass sclera which are impermeable
to cor
nea
Disadvantages/ challenges encountered
Corneal barrier, higher
tear dilution, and turnover rate, efflux pumps, low bioavailability (<5%), high dosing
Toxic endothelial cell
destruction syndrome (TECDS) and toxic anterior segment syndrome (TASS) may occur with inappropriate doses and preparations
Subconjunctival
hemorrhage, increased toxicity with choroidal and conjunctival circulation
Invasive, low
bioavailability as compared to intravitreal
Applications
Keratitis, dry eye,
conjunctivitis, episcleritis, scleritis, blepharitis, uveitis
Anesthesia,
inflammation, prevention of endophthalmitis after surgery, glaucoma, pupil dilation
Corneal opacity,
glaucoma, retinitis
Glaucoma, retinitis, to
deliver anti­angiogenic drugs to target sites
5 Intravitreal Direct delivery to vitreous
and retina, high bioavailability, evades BRB
6 Retrobulbar Site for drug depot,
selective delivery to both anterior and posterior segments, avoidance of corneal and conjunctival barriers, long duration of action
Due to vitreous fluid
turnover- frequent IVTs may cause increased IOP, hemorrhage, retinal detachment, cataract, endophthalmitis, patient incompliance
Poor patient compliance
due to invasiveness, pain, risk of hemorrhage, eyeball perforation or optic nerve damage
Retinal vein occlusion,
cytomegalovirus retinitis, diabetic macular oedema
Anesthesia
(continued)