Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5919_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Preface
- •Contents
- •Contributors
- •1. Introduction
- •2. The Initial Phase of Drug Delivery Systems
- •3. Recent Drug Delivery Systems
- •4. Drug Delivery via Carriers
- •5.4 Polymer-Lipid Hybrid Nanoparticles Drug Delivery System
- •5.5 Self-Micro Emulsifying Drug Delivery System
- •5.6 In Situ Gel Drug Delivery System
- •5.8 Targeted Drug Delivery
- •6. Ceramic-Based Drug Delivery System
- •7. Polysaccharide-Based Drug Delivery System
- •8. Closed Loop Insulin Delivery System
- •9. Liposome-Mediated Drug Delivery
- •5. Recent Drug Delivery Systems
- •5.3 Hexagonal Boron Nitride Nanosheet Drug Delivery System
- •10. Dendrimers
- •11. PEGylated Drug Delivery System
- •12. Antibody-Drug Conjugate System
- •13. Mesoporous Silica-Based Drug Delivery
- •14. Transdermal Drug Delivery System
- •15. Hydrogel-Mediated Ocular Drug Delivery
- •16. Challenges with Current Drug Delivery Systems
- •17. Future Direction and Conclusion
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Pharmacokinetic Principles
- •2.1 Application of the Pharmacokinetic Principle in the Biomedical Fields
- •3. Cell Membrane/Biological Membrane
- •3.1 Passage of Drugs Across Biological Membranes
- •3.1.1 Simple Transport
- •3.1.2 Specialized Transport
- •4. Routes of Drug Administration
- •4.1 Oral (Enteral) Versus Parenteral Administration
- •4.2 Various Routes of Drug Administration
- •5. Absorption
- •5.1 Factors Affecting Absorption of Drugs
- •5.1.1 Physio-chemical Characteristics
- •5.1.2 Dosage Form
- •5.1.3 Concentration and Volume
- •5.1.4 Blood Flow
- •5.1.5 Surface Area
- •5.1.6 Administration Route
- •5.1.7 Disease States
- •5.2 Gastrointestinal Tract
- •5.3 Parenteral Sites
- •5.4 Pulmonary Sites (Alveoli)
- •5.5 Topical Sites
- •6. Distribution
- •6.1 Factors Affecting Distribution of Drugs
- •6.1.1 Physicochemical Properties of the Drug
- •6.1.2 Binding to Plasma and Tissue Proteins
- •6.1.3 Blood Flow and Organ Size
- •6.1.4 Specialized Compartments and Barriers
- •6.1.5 Specialized Transport Systems
- •6.1.6 Disease States
- •6.1.7 Physiological Factors
- •7. Metabolism/Biotransformation
- •7.1 Functions of Metabolism
- •7.2 Sites of Metabolism
- •7.3.1 Microsomal Enzymes
- •7.3.2 Non-microsomal Enzymes
- •7.4 Pathways of Biotransformation
- •8. Excretion
- •8.1 Routes of Excretion
- •8.1.1 Renal Excretion of Drugs
- •8.1.2 Extra-Renal Excretion of Drugs
- •9.1 Minimum Effective Concentration (MEC)
- •9.2 Maximum Safe Concentration (MSC) or Minimum Toxic Concentration (MTC)
- •9.4 Area Under the Curve (AUC)
- •9.5 Peak Effect
- •9.7 Onset of Action
- •9.8 Onset Time
- •9.9 Duration of Action
- •10. Order of Pharmacokinetic Processes
- •10.1 Zero-Order Kinetics
- •10.2 First-Order Kinetics
- •10.3 Mixed-Order Kinetics
- •11. Pharmacokinetic Models
- •11.1 Compartmental Models
- •11.3 Physiological Models
- •12. Determinants of Pharmacokinetics
- •12.1 Absorption
- •12.1.1 Bioavailability
- •12.1.2 Bioequivalence
- •12.1.3 Area Under Curve (AUC)
- •12.2 Distribution
- •12.2.1 Volume of Distribution
- •12.3 Elimination
- •12.3.2 Clearance (Cl) or Body Clearance
- •13. Conclusion
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Principles of Targeted Drug Delivery
- •3.1 Changes in pH and Salt Development
- •3.7 Dendrimers
- •4.1 Small-Sized Molecule-Based Targeting Strategies
- •4.2 Nucleic Acid Fragment-Based Targeting Strategies
- •4.3 Peptide- and Antibody-Based Targeting Strategies
- •4.4 Cell-Based Targeting Strategies
- •5. Conclusion
- •References
- •3.4 Liposomes
- •3.5 Solid Lipid Nanoparticles
- •3.6 Co-crystal Preparation
- •1. Introduction
- •2. History
- •3.1 Organic Nanoparticles
- •3.2 Inorganic Nanoparticles
- •4. Nanotechnology-Based Drug Delivery Systems
- •4.1 Smart Drug Delivery Systems
- •4.3 Multifunctional Drug Carriers
- •4.4 Organic/Inorganic Composites
- •5. Nanoparticulate Drug Delivery Systems
- •5.1 Liposomes
- •5.2 Microemulsions
- •5.3 Nanoparticles
- •6. Applications
- •6.1 Enhanced Drug Delivery
- •6.2 Overcoming Biological Barriers
- •6.3 Controlled Drug Release
- •6.4 Combination Therapy
- •6.5 Personalized Medicine
- •7. Limitations
- •7.1 Complexity and Cost
- •7.2 Biocompatibility and Toxicity
- •7.3 Stability and Shelf Life
- •7.4 Drug Loading and Release
- •7.5 Biological Barriers and Clearance
- •8. Conclusions
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Guidelines for Design of Lipid-Based Formulations
- •3. Formulation Strategies
- •3.1 Lipid Nanoparticles
- •3.1.1 Solid Lipid Nanoparticles (SLNs)
- •3.1.2 Nanostructured Lipid Carriers (NLCs)
- •3.2 Liposomes
- •3.2.1 Conventional Liposomes
- •3.2.2 PEGylated Liposomes
- •3.2.3 Multifunctional Liposomes
- •3.3 Microemulsions and Self-micro Emulsifying Drug Delivery Systems (SMEDDS)
- •3.4 Hybrid Systems
- •3.4.1 Lipid-Polymer Hybrid Nanoparticles
- •3.4.2 Lipid-Protein Hybrid Systems
- •4. Advanced Characterization Methods
- •4.1 In Vitro and In Vivo Assessment
- •4.1.1 Dissolution Studies
- •4.1.2 Permeability Studies
- •4.2 Imaging Techniques
- •4.2.1 Electron Microscopy
- •4.2.2 Fluorescence Imaging
- •Fluorescent Probes
- •Confocal Microscopy
- •4.2.3 Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
- •4.3 Stability Studies
- •4.3.1 Oxidative Stability
- •4.3.2 Thermal Stability
- •5. Applications of Lipid-Based Drug Delivery Systems
- •5.1 Cancer Therapy
- •5.1.1 Targeted Drug Delivery
- •5.1.2 Combination Therapy
- •5.2 Central Nervous System Disorders
- •5.2.2 Neuroprotective Effects
- •5.3 Antiviral and Antimicrobial Applications
- •5.3.1 Lipid Nanoparticles for Antiviral Drugs
- •5.3.2 Antibiotic Delivery Systems
- •6. Future Perspectives and Challenges
- •7. Conclusion
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •3. Design and Characterization of Polymeric Drug Delivery Systems
- •4. Responsive Polymers
- •4.1 Polymeric Hydrogels
- •4.1.1 Characterization of Polymeric Hydrogels
- •Structural Analysis
- •Functional Analysis
- •4.2 Polymeric Micelles
- •4.2.1 Characterization of Polymeric Micelle
- •Critical Micelle Concentration Determination (CMC)
- •Morphological Characterization
- •Physicochemical Characterization
- •4.3 Liposomes
- •4.3.1 Ethosome
- •4.3.2 Transferosome
- •4.3.3 Niosome
- •4.4 Polyplexes or Polymer-Drug Conjugates
- •4.4.1 Dendrimers
- •4.4.2 Polymer-Protein Conjugates
- •4.4.3 Polymeric Nanoparticles
- •5. Conclusion
- •6. Future Prospects
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •2.1 Types of Stimuli
- •3. Mechanism of Stimuli Responsiveness
- •3.1 pH-Responsive Systems
- •4. Materials
- •4.1 pH-Responsive Materials
- •4.4 Synthetic Thermo-Responsive Materials
- •4.7 Magnetic Responsive Materials
- •4.8.1 Intrinsically Conducting Polymers
- •4.8.2 Hydrogels
- •5. Methods
- •5.1 pH-Responsive Drug Delivery Systems
- •6. Conclusion
- •7. Notes
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •3. Basic Features Required for the Biomaterial
- •4. Characteristics of Biomaterials
- •6. Biocompatibility as the Crucial Item
- •7. Biomaterials in Drug Delivery
- •8. Controlled Drug Delivery
- •9. Clinical Need for Controlled Drug Delivery
- •10. Biomaterials for Controlled Release of Small Molecules
- •11. Bioresponsive Polymers: From Design to Implementation
- •11.3 Hydrolysis and Enzymatically Responsive Polymers
- •11.7 Swelling and Contracting Polymers
- •12. Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems
- •12.1 Barriers to Transdermal Delivery
- •12.2 Development of Transdermal Drug Delivery Patches
- •12.3 Hydrogels Versus Non-hydrogel Polymeric Patches
- •12.4 Patches Based on Biopolymers
- •12.5 Patches Based on Synthetic Polymers
- •12.6 Drug Particles/Carriers
- •12.7 Commercial Patches
- •13. Smart Biomaterials
- •14. Conclusion and Future Perspective
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •1.1 Historical Evolution
- •2. Skin Anatomy and Physiology
- •2.1 Cutaneous Layer Organization
- •2.2 Cutaneous Barrier Function
- •3. Mechanisms of Transdermal Drug Delivery
- •4. Formulation Strategies for Transdermal Drug Delivery
- •4.1 Drug Selection Criteria
- •4.2 Vehicle and Excipient Considerations
- •4.3 Permeation Enhancers
- •4.4 Transdermal Drug Delivery Technologies
- •5. Evaluation Methods for Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems
- •6. Applications of Transdermal Drug Delivery
- •6.1 Therapeutic Areas
- •6.2 Case Studies of Successful Transdermal Products
- •7. Regulatory Considerations and Approval Process
- •7.1 FDA Guidelines for Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems
- •7.2 Quality Control and Manufacturing Standards
- •7.3 Clinical Trial Requirements
- •8. Challenges and Future Perspectives
- •8.1 Overcoming Cutaneous Barrier Properties
- •8.2 Expanding the Range of Deliverable Drugs
- •8.3 Intelligent and Responsive Transdermal Systems
- •8.4 Integration with Other Drug Delivery Technologies
- •8.5 Conclusion
- •References
- •1. Background
- •2. Importance of the Tumor Microenvironment (TME) in Cancer Progression and Therapy
- •2.1 Components of the TME
- •2.2 Therapeutic Targeting of the TME
- •2.3 Impact of Standard Therapies on the TME
- •3. Tumor-Homing Peptides
- •3.1 Different Strategies for Targeting Peptides to Tumor Microenvironment
- •3.2 Applications and Development
- •3.3 Examples and Discoveries
- •4. Tumor Microenvironment Responsive Drug Delivery Systems (DDSS)
- •5. Nanoparticle-Based Smart Drug Delivery Systems
- •5.1.1 Endogenous Stimulus-Responsive Drug Delivery Systems (DDSs)
- •5.1.2 Exogenous Stimulus-Responsive DDSs
- •5.2.2 Dynamic Strategies for Tumor Targeting
- •6. Challenges and Opportunities for Targeted Delivery to Cancer Cells
- •7. Future Directions
- •8. Conclusions
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Materials
- •2.1 Types of Biosensors
- •2.1.2 Smart Polymers
- •2.1.3 Microfabricated Devices
- •2.2.1 Enzyme-Based Biosensors
- •2.2.2 Antibody-Based Biosensors
- •2.2.3 Aptamer-Based Biosensors
- •2.2.4 Whole-Cell-Based Biosensors
- •3. Methods
- •3.1 Approach Toward Designing Biosensors
- •3.1.1 Selection of the Analyte and Bioreceptors
- •3.1.2 Immobilization of Biosensors
- •3.1.3 Selection of Transducer
- •3.2 Green Biosensors
- •3.3 Challenges in Development of Biosensors-Based Drug Delivery Systems
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •3. Ocular Barriers Hindering Absorption of Drugs
- •3.1 Precorneal Barriers
- •3.1.1 Tear Film, Tear Turnover, and Nasolacrimal Duct Drainage
- •3.1.3 Conjunctival and Scleral Barriers
- •3.2 Corneal Barrier
- •3.3 Blood-Ocular Barriers
- •4. Various Routes for Ocular Drug Delivery
- •4.1 Topical Administration
- •4.2 Subconjunctival Administration
- •4.3 Transscleral Administration
- •4.4 Intracameral Administration
- •4.5 Intravitreal Injections/Implants (IVIs)
- •4.6 Retrobulbar Administration
- •4.7 Systemic Administration
- •5. Nanotechnology-Based Ocular Drug Delivery Platforms
- •5.1 Nanoparticles (NPs)
- •5.1.1 Polymeric Nanoparticles (PNPs)
- •5.2 Nanomicelles
- •5.3 Nanoemulsions (NEs)
- •5.4 Nanosuspensions
- •5.5 Nanocrystals (NCs)
- •5.6 Liposomes
- •5.7 Microemulsions
- •5.8 Niosomes
- •5.10 Dendrimers
- •5.11 Nanowafers
- •5.12 Cubosomes
- •5.13 Bilosomes
- •5.14 Olaminosomes
- •5.15 Contact Lenses
- •5.16 Hydrogels
- •5.17 Microneedles (MNs)
- •6. Alternative Ocular Drug Delivery Approaches
- •6.1 Gene Therapy
- •6.1.1 Viral Vectors
- •6.1.2 Non-viral Vectors
- •6.1.3 Antisense Oligonucleotides (ASOs), RNAi, CRISPR-Cas9
- •6.2 Exosomes
- •6.3 Self-nano Emulsifying Drug Delivery Structures (SNEDDS)
- •7. Clinical Status of Nanotechnology-Based Ocular Drug Delivery Systems
- •8. Future Outlooks
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Anatomy and Physiology of GIT
- •2.1 Mouth and Esophagus
- •2.2 Stomach
- •2.3 Small Intestine
- •2.4 Ruminant Digestive System
- •3. Blood Supply
- •4. Nerve Supply
- •5. Challenges in GIT Drug Delivery
- •5.1 Acidic Environment of the Stomach
- •5.2 Alkaline pH of the Intestine
- •5.3 Variable GI Transit Times
- •6. Future Opportunities in GIT Drug Delivery
- •6.1.1 Targeted Delivery Systems
- •6.1.2 Ligand-Conjugated Nanoparticles
- •6.1.3 Liposomes
- •6.1.4 Solid Lipid Nanoparticles
- •6.2 Controlled Release Systems
- •6.2.1 Osmotic Pumps
- •6.2.2 Matrix Systems
- •6.3 Mucoadhesive Systems
- •6.3.1 Mucoadhesive Polymers
- •6.4 Absorption Enhancers
- •6.5 Tight Junction Modulators
- •6.6 Development of Prodrugs
- •7. Conclusion
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Anatomy and Physiology of the Respiratory System
- •3. Traditional Methods of Respiratory Drug Delivery
- •3.1 Metered-Dose Inhalers (MDIs)
- •3.2 Dry Powder Inhalers (DPIs)
- •3.3 Nebulizers
- •3.5 Improved Patient Compliance Through User-Friendly Devices
- •3.8 Enhanced Absorption by Overcoming Biological Barriers
- •3.9 Macromolecule Delivery Facilitation
- •3.10 Reduced Side Effects Through Improved Targeting
- •3.11 Formulation Challenges Addressed
- •3.12 Smart Technology Integration for Personalized Treatment
- •3.13 Environmental Sustainability Considerations
- •4. Novel Drug Delivery Approaches
- •4.2 Liposomal Formulations
- •5. Advanced Inhalation Devices
- •6. Targeted Drug Delivery Strategies
- •6.2 pH-Responsive Drug Release
- •7. Emerging Therapeutics for Respiratory Diseases
- •8.2 Combination Therapies
- •8.3 Prodrug Approaches
- •9. Personalized Medicine in Respiratory Drug Delivery
- •10. Future Perspectives and Emerging Technologies
- •10.1 3D-Printed Inhalers
- •11. Conclusion
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Delivery of Small Molecules
- •3. Drawbacks of Conventional Drug Delivery System
- •4. Factors Affecting Cardiovascular Drug Targeting System
- •4.1 Particle Shape
- •4.2 Particle Size
- •4.3 Particle Density
- •4.4 Flow Characteristics
- •5. Various Targeted Drug Delivery Systems
- •5.1 Application of Exosomes and EVs (Extracellular Vesicles)
- •5.4 Nanomedicines in Cardiovascular Therapy
- •5.5 PLGA-Based Nanoparticles
- •5.6 Liposomal Delivery Systems
- •5.7 Delivery of Biologicals
- •5.8 RNA-Based Delivery
- •5.9 Therapeutic Proteins and Peptides
- •6. Future Perspectives and Challenges
- •7. Conclusion
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Materials
- •2.1 Equipment
- •2.2 Drugs
- •3. Methods
- •3.1.1 Extrusion-Based 3D Bioprinting
- •3.1.2 Inkjet 3D Bioprinting
- •3.1.3 Light-Based Bioprinting
- •3.1.4 Laser-Assisted Printing
- •3.2 Multiple Drug Delivery
- •3.2.1 Multilayer Films with Capsule-Integrated Polypeptide/Polyelectrolyte
- •3.2.2 Multilayer Shells Using Polypeptides/Polyelectrolytes (PL or PG) and LbL Assembly
- •3.3.1 Physical Stimulation-Responsive Drug Delivery Systems
- •3.3.4 Light-Responsive Drug Delivery Systems (LRDDS)
- •3.4 Small Molecule Delivery System
- •3.4.1 Intraarticular Delivery System
- •3.5 Gene Delivery System
- •3.6 Stem Cell Technology
- •4. Conclusion
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Importance of Targeted Drug Delivery to the Reproductive System
- •3. Challenges in Drug Delivery to the Reproductive System
- •4. Advances in Drug Delivery Systems
- •4.2 Liposomes
- •4.3 Hydrogels and Biodegradable Polymers
- •4.4 Injectable and Implantable Devices
- •4.5 Micro- and Nano-Needles
- •4.6 Spermbots
- •5.1 Vaginal and Cervical Delivery
- •5.2 Uterine and Intrauterine Delivery
- •5.3 Penile and Testicular Delivery
- •6. Targeted and Precision Medicine Approaches
- •6.1 Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT)
- •6.2 Gene Therapy and RNA-Based Approaches
- •6.3 Personalized Medicine in Reproductive Disorders
- •7. Therapeutic Applications and Innovations
- •7.1 Infertility and Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART)
- •7.2 Treatment of Reproductive Cancers
- •7.4 Contraceptive Technologies
- •8. Safety and Regulatory Considerations
- •9. Future Directions and Emerging Trends
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Liposomes
- •3. Preparation of Liposomes
- •3.1 Reagents
- •3.2 Hydration and Liposome Extrusion
- •3.4 Conjugation
- •3.8 PEGylation
- •3.8.1 Materials Required
- •3.8.2 Procedure
- •3.9 Liposomal Doxorubicin (LD)
- •3.10 Marqibo (Vincristine Sulfate)
- •3.11 DepoCyt (Cytarabine)
- •4. Poly(Lactic-co-Glycolic Acid, PLGA) Nanoparticles
- •4.2 Methods
- •4.2.1 Reagents
- •4.2.2 Procedure
- •5. Polycaprolactone (PCL)
- •5.2 pH Sensitivity and Stability
- •5.3 Methods
- •5.3.1 Materials
- •5.4 Drug Loading
- •6. Chitosan-Based Systems
- •6.1 Encapsulation of Nucleic Acids and Proteins
- •6.3 pH Sensitivity and Stability of Chitosan Nanoparticles
- •6.4 Methodology
- •6.4.1 Reagents
- •6.4.2 Procedure
- •7. Dendrimers
- •7.1 Antisense Oligonucleotides
- •7.2 Small-Interfering RNA (siRNA)
- •7.4.1 Divergent Method
- •7.4.2 Convergent Method
- •8. Challenges in Developing Orphan Drugs
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Vaccine Delivery Systems
- •3. Polymers
- •4. Non-biodegradable NPs
- •5. Calcium Phosphate NPs
- •6. Colloidally Stable Nanoparticles
- •7. Proteasomes
- •8. Liposomes
- •9. Virus-like Particles (VLPs) and Virosomes
- •10. Immune-Stimulating Complexes ISCOMs
- •11. Emulsion Delivery Systems
- •12. Exosome-Based Vaccine Delivery System
- •13. Immunotherapy Using Nano- and Microparticles
- •14. Properties and Role of Nanoparticles in Drug Delivery
- •15. Biomimicry
- •16. Micellar Systems
- •17. Hydrogels
- •18. Edible Vaccines
- •19. Plant-Derived Viruses
- •20. Melt-in Mouth Strips
- •21. Transdermal Delivery
- •22. Delivery of Nucleic Acids
- •23. mRNA Delivery
- •24. Delivery of Cytokines
- •25. DC Targeting
- •26. Drug Delivery Targeting T Cells
- •27. Conclusions
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Materials
- •2.1 Equipment
- •2.2 Reagents and Solutions
- •3. Methods
- •3.1 Adenovirus
- •3.3 Retroviral Vectors (RV)
- •3.4 Lentivirus (LV)
- •4. Conclusion
- •References
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Technologies Utilizing Cells in Treating Diseases
- •2.1 Somatic Cell Technologies
- •2.2 Immortalized Cell Lines
- •2.5 Genome Editing Technologies
- •2.6 Cell Plasticity Technologies
- •3. Different Kinds of Cells Are Utilized in the Process of Cell Treatment
- •4. The Practices of Regenerative Medicine and Cell Therapy
- •4.1 Veterinary Medicine Therapeutic Uses
- •5. Advancements and Challenges in Drug Delivery
- •6. Drug Delivery Systems and Applications
- •6.2 Drug Nanocarriers Based on Hyaluronic Acid
- •6.3 Hexagonal Boron Nitride Nanosheet Drug Delivery System
- •6.4 Polymer-Lipid Hybrid Nanoparticles
- •6.6 In Situ Gel Drug Delivery System

Biosensor-Based Drug Delivery Systems: Innovations, Applications, and… 249
30. Martinkova P, Kostelnik A, Valek T, Pohanka
(2017) Main streams in the construction of
M
biosensors and their applications. Int J Electrochem Sci 12:7386–7403
31. Nguyen HH, Kim M (2017) An
overview of
techniques in enzyme immobilization. Appl Sci
Converg Technol 26:157–163
32. Sassolas A, Blum LJ, Leca-Bouvier BD (2012)
Immobilization
strategies to develop enzy-
matic biosensors. Biotechnol Adv 30:489–511
33. Sneha HP, Beulah KC, Murthy PS (2019)
Enzyme
immobilization methods and applications in the food industry. In: Kuddus M
(ed) Enzymes in food biotechnology, 1st edn.
Academic, London, pp 645–658
34. Malhotra BD, Ali MA (2017) Nanomaterials in
biosensors:
fundamentals and applications. In:
Malhotra BD, Ali MA (eds) Nanomaterials for
biosensors, 1st edn. Elsevier, Cambridge, MA,
pp 1–73
35. Shanker A, Lee K, Kim J (2014) Synthetic
hybrid
biosensors. In: Meyers RA
(ed) Encyclopedia of molecular cell biology
and molecular medicine, 2nd edn. WileyVCH Verlag Gmbh & Co. KGaA, Weinheim,
pp 1–36
36.
Grieshaber D, MacKenzie R, Janos Vo¨ro¨s J ,
Reimhult E (2008) Electrochemical
biosensors—sensor principles and architectures. Sensors 8:1400– 1458
37. Bollella P, Schulz C, Favero G, Mazzei F,
Ludwig R, Gorton L, Antiochia R (2017)
Green synthesis and characterization of gold
and silver nanoparticles and their application
for development of a third generation lactose
biosensor
. Electroanalysis 29:77–86
38. Santhosh A, Theertha V, Prakash P, Smitha
Chandran S
(2021) From waste to a value
added product: green synthesis of silver nanoparticles from onion peels together with its
diverse applications. Mater Today Proc 46:
4460–4463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
matpr.2020.09.680
39. Zamarchi F, Vieira IC (2021) Determination
paracetamol using a sensor based on green
of
synthesis of silver nanoparticles in plant extract.
J Pharm Biomed Anal 196:113912. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2021.113912
40. Tian Y, Chengnan X, Juan Qiao LQ, Zhang R
(2019)
Green synthesis of gold nanoclusters
using papaya juice for detection of L-lysine.
Chin Chem Lett 30:660–663
41. Chen Y, Qiao J, Liu Q, Zhang M, Qi L (2018)
Fluorescence
turn-on assay for detection of
serum D-penicillamine based on papain@AuNCs-Cu2þ complex. Anal Chim Acta
1026:133–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
aca.2018.04.014
42. Singh P, Singh Kshitji RB, Singh Jay SRP
(2021)
Biogenic synthesis of copper oxide
nanoparticles: characterization and biosensing
applications, SPAST Abstr
43. Sukumar S, Ru
drasenan A, Padmanabhan
Nambiar D (2020) Green-synthesized riceshaped copper oxide nanoparticles using Caesalpinia bonducella seed extract and their
applications. ACS Omega 5:1040–1051.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.9b02857


Chapter 12
Ocular Drug Delivery: Overcoming Barriers for Effective
Treatment
Anuradha Nema
Abstract
Eye is a complex organ responsible for vision with its unique anatomy and physiology. Conventional routes
for ocular drug delivery include topical, subconjunctival, intracameral, intravitreal, transscleral, retrobulbar,
and systemic. Among them, topical route is one of the preferred routes due to its non-invasiveness, safety,
and high patient compliance. However, presence of various anatomical and physiological ocular barriers
creates hindrance in active absorption and activity of therapeutic drugs to treat ocular diseases by any route.
To overcome various ocular barriers and improve drug bioavailability, development of nanotechnologybased ocular drug delivery system (ODDS) is advantageous. Ocular treatment is achieving the higher level
with several advantages due to advancement in nanocarriers. Nanostructured platforms have several positive
outcomes, including overcoming ocular barriers, increasing transcorneal permeability, lengthening drug
residence time, reducing drug degradation, decreasing dosing frequency, achieving sustained release,
improving patient compliance, drug targeting, and gene delivery. Many nanocarriers, such as nanoparticles,
nanosuspensions, nanomicelles, nanofibers, nanoemulsions, liposomes, etc., have proven excellent delivery
potential in both in-vitro and in-vivo studies, enhancing drug permeability across the ocular barriers and
increasing drug bioavailability in the eye. In future, more innovations are needed to achieve greater results
in management of ocular diseases.
Key words Drug targeting, Gene delivery, Nanocarriers, Nanotechnology, Ocular barriers, Ocular
drug delivery system, Residence time, Transcorneal permeability
1 Introduction
Vision, a complex and multipart process, gives a sense of sight and is
accomplished by a highly complex sense organ, the eye. Eye is the
only organ to directly observe nervous system (optic nerve) and
peripheral vasculature (retinal arterioles and venules) and thus is
helpful in diagnosing various systemic diseases [
anatomy and physiology offer eye with challenges for drug delivery
to targeted sites. Anatomically, it is divided into anterior and posterior segments [
2]. Both segments of eye are vulnerable to a variety
of diseases either due to local cause or systemic problems, causing
251
1]. Complicated

252 Anuradha Nema
visual impairment. Structurally and functionally, ophthalmic tissues
are protected by certain dynamic and static protective barriers
3]. These barriers are precorneal barriers, corneal barrier and
[
blood-ocular barriers. Tear film, reflex blinking, eyelid, conjunctiva,
cornea, and nasolacrimal drainage prevent the eye surface from
foreign substances [
4]. Blood-ocular barriers include the blood-
aqueous barrier (BAB) in the anterior segment and blood-retinal
barrier (BRB) in the posterior segment of eye that prevent the toand-fro movement of etiological agents between eye and blood
circulation [
it
still
is
. Although eye has multiple protective mechanisms,
5]
vulnerable to infection, trauma, and other diseases. Cataract, glaucoma, diabetic retinopathy, keratitis, uveitis, etc. can cause
vision impairment, and their adequate treatment is of utmost
importance to improve quality of life [
6]. Medicinal treatment is
the primary treatment for most of eye diseases. Delivering drugs to
target eye tissues at the desired therapeutic concentration without
affecting other unaffected tissues is of prime concern [
protective barriers,
which are considered as boon for eye protection
7]. Besides,
on one hand, serve as hindrance in ocular therapy on the
other hand.
To achieve therapeutic effects, medications are either applied
topically, delivered subconjunctivaly, intraocularly (intracameral or
intravitreal), periocularly (subtenon, retrobulbar, or juxtascleral),
or systemically [
8]. Ocular barriers create a substantial challenge in
treating ocular problems in relation to attainment at the desired site
and residing there for an appropriate duration. As a consequence,
bioavailability of medications is often less than 5% [
For a
ffective therapeutics, ocular drug delivery systems
n e
9].
(ODDS) are designed so as to: (a) deliver drugs to target ocular
tissues by overcoming ocular barriers, (b) enhance drug stability
and treatment efficiency, (c) lengthen drug retention time and
decrease dosing frequency, (d) facilitate multiple drug combinations, and (e) increase patient compliance and diminish drugrelated side effects [
Ocular medications
10].
used are either in liquid (drops, suspension, and emulsion), solid (powder, insert, contact lens), semi-solid
(gels and ointments), or mixed (in-situ gel) form. Among all, eye
drops are the commonest form of medications used. But they are
limited mostly to deliver the medications into the anterior part of
11].
eye and have short residence time [
For a drug to be effective, it
must reach and preserve an acceptable drug concentration with
minimum quantity of active therapeutic component. It is achieved
by appropriate corneal penetration along with effective precorneal
residence time. To overcome all ocular therapeutic challenges,
innovative nanotechnology is evidencing dynamic progress in the
field of ocular drug delivery. These technologies are providing new
ophthalmic therapeutic interferences by overcoming ocular obstacles, reducing drug degradation, increasing dr ug residence time,

2 Eye’s Anatomy
Ocular Drug Delivery: Overcoming Barriers for Effective Treatment 253
enhancing trans-corneal permeation across barriers, and reducing
dosing frequency. Nanosystems with numerous advantages are to
the next level as compared to traditional drug administration by
improving patient compliance, achieving sustained and controlled
release, drug targeting, and gene delivery [
12]. Nanocarriers, such
as nanoemulsions (NEs), nanomicelles, microemulsions, nanoparticles (NPs), nanofibers, dendrimers, liposomes, nanowafers,
microneedles (MNs), etc., are effective in therapy of anterior and
posterior ocular diseases. Gene therapy, exosome, and self-nanoemulsifying drug delivery systems (SNEDDS) are emerging as
potential tools in ocular drug delivery [
ophthalmic treatment, a novel
non-invasive ODDS is important to
13]. Hence, for effective
overcome ocular barriers, sustained drug release, and its maintained
effective drug concentrations at the targeted site.
Anatomically eye is divided into anterior and posterior segments.
Anterior segment includes tear film, cornea, pupil, conjunctiva, iris,
ciliary body, aqueous humor, and lens, while the posterior segment
is composed of sclera, choroid, vitreous body, retina, and optic
nerve. Anatomy of eye is demonstrated in Fig.
1. Quantity and
Fig. 1 Anatomy of the eye. (1) Anterior segment; (2) posterior segment; (3) tear
film; (4) sclera; (5) eyelid; (6) cornea; (7) anterior chamber; (8) iris; (9) pupil;
(10) lens; (11) vitreous body; (12) retina; (13) optic nerve; (14) blood vessels;
(15) choroid

254 Anuradha Nema
quality of tear film are controlled by orbital glands. Cornea is
composed of five layers, epithelium, bowman’s membrane, stroma,
descemet’s membrane, and endothelium. It is known as a lipidaqueous-lipid sandwich, where stroma (hydrophilic) is sandwiched
between epithelium and endothelium. Transparency of cornea is
preserved by endothelium [
mucous membrane, is divided into palpebral
5
]. Conjunctiva, a delicate transparent
and bulbar conjunctiva. It is composed of epithelium, substantia propria enclosing
nerves, lymphatic and blood vessels, and submucosa layer. Iris,
the pigmented portion of eye, regulates the quantity of light
penetrating the eye through control of pupil size. Ciliary body is
composed of pigmented and non-pigmented epithelium, stroma,
and muscles. Capillaries of ciliary body is res
cation between anterior and posterior segments.
ponsible for communi-
Transparent lens
focuses the light onto retina. Vitreous humor, a gel-like, clear,
avascular tissue, maintains the shape of eye. It is made of 99.9%
water, hyaluronic acid, and collagen. Sclera is made of collagen and
mucopolysaccharides. Choroid, situated between sclera and retina,
is a vascular layer. The retina is composed of neural and glial cells
that produces electrical impulses and deliver
brain [
11].
them via optic nerve to
3 Ocular Barriers Hindering Absorption of Drugs
Static and dynamic absorption barriers in eye prevent extraneous
substances, including therapeutic agents, from reaching to targeted
sites. Dynamic barriers principally include tear film, tear turnover,
nasolacrimal duct drainage, conjunctival and choroidal blood flow,
and lymphatic clearance. Cornea, conjunctiva, sclera, vitreous body,
BAB, and BRB form static barriers of eye. Barriers can also be stated
as precorneal, corneal, and blood-ocular barriers. Various ocular
barriers are depicted in Fig.
various ocular therapeutic drugs, thereby reducing their
bioavailability [14].
3.1 Precorneal Barriers
3.1.1 Tear Film, Tear Turnover, and Nasolacrimal Duct Drainage
Tear film, eyelids and their reflex blinking, conjunctiva, and nasolacrimal drainage prevent foreign substances away from the eye
surface. It prevents drugs from reaching the cornea and other
ocular tissues. Variations in capacity of cul-de-sac also affects therapeutic drug concentration in eye.
A thin, transparent tear film is composed of an outer lipid layer,
middle aqueous layer, and inner mucin layer. Negatively charged
mucin layer protect the eye surface from harmful molecules and
infections through electrostatic forces. The aqueous and lipid layers
act as barriers for lipophilic and lipophobic drugs, respectively
15]. The non-specific binding of drugs to tear enzymes and
[
2. All barriers limit absorption of

Fig. 2 Ocular barriers
Ocular Drug Delivery: Overcoming Barriers for Effective Treatment 255
proteins also obstruct drug absorption and entry through cornea
and anterior chamber. Additionally, after topical application of
drugs tear turnover increases, resulting in rapid removal of drug
through nasolacrimal drainage (1–2 minutes). This drainage is a
major barrier in the precorneal region [
16]. In view of maintaining
effective drug concentration, residence time of the drug must be
attained by different mechanisms.
3.1.2 Capacity of Cul-desac
3.1.3 Conjunctival and Scleral Barriers
Cul-de-sac, a shallow pocket in the lower eyelid where palpebral
and bulbar conjunctiva meet, has a maximum capacity of approximately 30 μL [
17]. In inflammatory and allergic conditions of eye,
capacity of cul-de-sac is further minimized. The low capacity of culde-sac reduces the residence time and concentration of the drug in
eye, thereby reducing its therapeutic effects.
After topical administration, the non-corneal alternative route of
drug entry is through conjunctiva and sclera. Conjunctival mucous
membrane is formed by epithelium and stromal layer. It produces
and maintains tear film and protects the eye from external pathogens. Conjunctival surface area is approximately 17 times greater
than that of cornea. Hence, it is more permeable than the cornea
for absorption of macromolecules and hydrophilic compounds
18]. Additionally, being highly vascularized medicines remain
[
localized for shorter duration and systemically absorbed to be
distributed throughout the body. This non-productive huge drug
loss into the systemic circulation reduces ocular region bioavailability. To overcome this loss and to enhance drug efficacy, high

256 Anuradha Nema
concentrations with repeated instillations of drug are required
[
19]. However, in this way, patient compliance is negatively influ-
enced and possibility of side effects is increased.
After permeation from conjunctiva, drug travels through transscleral route from sclera to anterior segment. Sclera, the white part
of eye is an opaque, hard sheath and is relatively more permeable
with larger surface area than cornea. The scleral penetration of drug
is mainly determined by the size of drug and scleral thickness. Drug
spread across the sclera through perivascular space and between
scleral fibrils, to reach the choroid and retina [
20].
3.2 Corneal Barrier
3.3 Blood-Ocular Barriers
Cornea, the outermost clear, avascular layer, protects eye from
diverse chemical and mechanical injuries. It is composed of epithelium, stroma, and endothelium and poses a significant challenge for
ocular rug delivery. Only small and lipophilic drugs can pass
through epithelium, whereas stroma permits hydrophilic drugs.
Besides, the presence of cytochrome P450 (drug-degrading
enzymes) and drug efflux pumps in epithelium are responsible for
low drug bioavailability. Endothelium, due to its hydrophobic
nature, restricts the penetration of hydrophilic drug and macromolecules into aqueous humor. Thus, trans-corneal permeation is
rate-limiting step for drug transfer from lacrimal fluid into aqueous
humor that depends on drug molecular weight, hydrophobicity
charge, and degree of ionization [
21].
These barriers prevent the non-specific entry of foreign compounds
into the blood stream and are classified as blood-aqueous bar rier
(BAB) in anterior segment and blood-retinal barrier (BRB) in
posterior segment of eye. Additionally, they limit the entry of
compounds into the eye from systemic circulation. The bloodaqueous barrier consists of non-pigmented ciliary body of iris vasculature and epithelial tissue of the endothelial cells. The permeability of drugs across BAB is determined by the osmotic pressure
and physicochemical properties of therapeutic agents. Lipophilic
and small-molecule drugs can permeate more rapidly through barrier than hydrophilic and large-molecule drugs. This specialized
tissue barrier creates a challenge for ocular drug delivery and hin-
.
ders therapeutic efficacy [
The blood-retinal
22]
barrier is the most important barrier in posterior part of eye and comprises of internal and external components. The inner BRB is formed by tight junctions between retinal
capillary endothelial cells, while close junctions between retinal
pigment epithelial cells forms outer BRB. It prevents entry of
plasma components, drugs, and toxic substances into retina.
Hence, BRB is essential to maintain normal visual function [
23].

Ocular Drug Delivery: Overcoming Barriers for Effective Treatment 257
4 Various Routes for Ocular Drug Delivery
Conventional routes of ocular drug administration primarily
include topical, conjunctival and scleral, intracameral, intravitreal,
retrobulbar, and systemic routes. Figure
routes for ocular drug delivery. Table
of ocular drug administration with their advantages, challenges
encountered, and applications. Drug administration done by any
route has to bypass one or more ocular barriers to reach the
targeted site. Table
with their preferred route of administration and uses.
2 demonstrates some common ocular drugs
3 demonstrates various
1 summarizes various routes
4.1 Topical Administration
Topical administration is the commonest and easiest non-invasive
route of ocular drug administration. It represents more than 95% of
commercially available ocular products but with low bioavailability
(<5%). As compared to other routes of administration, it has the
advantages of (a) being non-invasive, (b) relative ease of drug
administration, and (c) minimum systemic side effects of drug.
Hence, ophthalmic solutions are the foremost choice for many
anterior segment eye diseases management, such as dry eye, inflammation, infection, allergy, and glaucoma [
24]. But, due to insuffi-
cient corneal permeation and short residence time, bioavailability is
low. Furthermore, bioavailability is reduced by tear drainage, reflex
blinking, and non-productive absorption to systemic circulation
through conjunctiva and nasolacrimal region. To overcome this
Fig. 3 Routes for ocular drug delivery. (1) Topical; (2) intracameral; (3) subconjunctival; (4) transscleral; (5) intravitreal; (6) retrobulbar; (7) systemic (oral or
parenteral)

258 Anuradha Nema
Table 1
Various routes of ocular drug administration, their advantages, disadvantages/challenges, and their
applications
Route of drug
S. No.
administration
1 Topical Non-invasive, self-
2 Intracameral Provides high anterior
3 Subconjunctival Site for depot
4 Transscleral Bypasses anterior segment
Advantages
administrable with high
patient compliance,
minimum systemic side
effects
chamber drug
concentration,
eliminates usage of
topical drops, avoids
corneal, conjunctival
and BAB barriers,
reduces corneal and
systemic side effects
seen with topical
steroid therapy
formulations to deliver
drugs to anterior and
posterior segment,
avoids corneal and BAB
barriers, large sized
molecules can pass
sclera which are
impermeable
to cor
nea
Disadvantages/
challenges encountered
Corneal barrier, higher
tear dilution, and
turnover rate, efflux
pumps, low
bioavailability (<5%),
high dosing
Toxic endothelial cell
destruction syndrome
(TECDS) and toxic
anterior segment
syndrome (TASS) may
occur with
inappropriate doses and
preparations
Subconjunctival
hemorrhage, increased
toxicity with choroidal
and conjunctival
circulation
Invasive, low
bioavailability as
compared to
intravitreal
Applications
Keratitis, dry eye,
conjunctivitis,
episcleritis, scleritis,
blepharitis, uveitis
Anesthesia,
inflammation,
prevention of
endophthalmitis
after surgery,
glaucoma, pupil
dilation
Corneal opacity,
glaucoma, retinitis
Glaucoma, retinitis, to
deliver antiangiogenic drugs to
target sites
5 Intravitreal Direct delivery to vitreous
and retina, high
bioavailability, evades
BRB
6 Retrobulbar Site for drug depot,
selective delivery to
both anterior and
posterior segments,
avoidance of corneal
and conjunctival
barriers, long duration
of action
Due to vitreous fluid
turnover- frequent
IVTs may cause
increased IOP,
hemorrhage, retinal
detachment, cataract,
endophthalmitis,
patient incompliance
Poor patient compliance
due to invasiveness,
pain, risk of
hemorrhage, eyeball
perforation or optic
nerve damage
Retinal vein occlusion,
cytomegalovirus
retinitis, diabetic
macular oedema
Anesthesia
(continued)
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
