Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_4606_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
15.09.2026
Размер:
16 Мб
Скачать
☆
266
https://t.me/medicina_free
E. R. Anson and Y. Gimmon
Vestibular Symptom Quantication
It is essential to use objective and reliable tools to assess vestibular function for patients with dizziness/vertigo such as the video head impulse test (vHIT) [60, 61], video nystagmography (VNG) [62], and vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs) [63, 64]. These physiological assessments are not only important for dif­ferential diagnosis, but help in developing a vestibular rehabilitation plan [65]. Of equal importance, subjective symptoms should also be quantied using valid and reliable tests [66]. The most common questionnaires characterize subjective dizzi­ness (Dizziness Handicap Inventory [67]) and balance condence (Activity-specic Balance Condence scale [68]). More specialized questionnaires may only deal with complaints as specic as oscillopsia severity [21, 57] or the functional impact of oscillopsia [58]. Other specic symptom scales include the Vertigo Symptom Scale Short Form [69] and Vertigo Visual Analogue Scale [70, 71]. Here, we describe some of the more common patient questionnaires used for individuals with vestibular disease.
The Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI
perceived handicap resulting from dizziness symptoms after vestibular disease.
The DHI consists of 25 questions about daily activities and self-care grouped
into three domains representing functional, emotional, and physical aspects of
dizziness. A high DHI score is associated with an increased level of handicap,
range of score is 0–100 (higher scores are worse) [67]. In different populations
the criteria for important change varied between 3 points and 20 points depend-
ing on how meaningful change was determined [67, 72, 73]. The Activities-specic Balance Condence scale (ABC) is a self-report measure-
ment and patient’s rate their balance condence for performing 16 daily living
activities. The score ranges from 0, which indicates no condence, to 100, which
indicates complete condence in the participant’s ability to perform the task
without losing balance. The ABC has excellent test–retest reliability (r=0.92)
and scores of 67% or lower are associated with increased fall risk [68, 74]. The Vertigo Symptom Scale, Short Form (VSS-SF) is a self-report 15-item question-
naire that measures symptoms severity (balance disorders, autonomic arousal,
and somatic anxiety) within the past month. Each item is scored from 0 to 4.
Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms [75]. Vertigo Visual Analogue Scale (VVAS) is based on the pain visual analog scale but
modied for dizzy patients. Participants rate their dizziness level for 16 different
activities on a scale of 0–10 (higher scores are worse). It has excellent reliability
(0.85–0.96) and good validity (r=0.67) [70, 71, 76].
When conducting balance performance assessments for individuals with vestibu­lar disorders it is critical to use an assessment that includes head and body motions that manipulate sensory availability/reliability. Numerous examples of physical per­formance tests exist to characterize balance impairments in patients with vestibular
)—This validated scale evaluates the self-
14 Vestibular Rehabilitation: APatient-Centered Approach
https://t.me/medicina_free
267
pathology. Two simple, easy to use, and widespread balance performance-based measures are:
Timed Up and Go test (TUG): This clinical screening measure examines general
mobility and screens for fall risk. The individual stands up from a standard chair,
walks 3m at a regular pace, turns around, and walks back to the chair and sits
down. The patient can use a walking aid if needed. The average time to complete
two repetitions is the score with shorter performance time indicating better
performance. A performance time longer than 13.5s indicates higher fall risk
[77]. Whitney etal. (2004) showed that the fall risk cut-off score for patients with
vestibular disorders is >11.1s, with a sensitivity of 80% and specicity of 56%
in falls prediction [78]. Dynamic Gait Index (DGI): The DGI is an 8-item scale that was developed initially
to identify fall risk in older adults [79]. The DGI is a sensitive assessment tool to
identify people at risk of falls due to vestibular disorders [80]. Participants are
scored on an ordinal score (0–3) while performing a variety of ambulatory tasks
such as walking with head turns or walking around/over obstacles. Scores of 19
points or less indicates an increased risk of falling [80]. Some patients may score
above the 19 point cut-off, and may benet from a more challenging version of
the test known as the Functional Gait Assessment [81].
A nal category of behavioral tests that are helpful for identifying impairments for individuals with vestibular disease evaluate behavioral performance of the VOR.The most common and low tech clinically friendly version of these tests that quantify gaze stability is the Dynamic Visual Acuity test (DVA) [82]. Computer aided testing allows for separately evaluating (1) how small a target can be recog­nized at specied head velocities [83], (2) the fastest velocity that an object of speci­ed size can be recognized [84, 85], and a combined evaluation of the VOR gain and DVA [86, 87]. Here we briey describe the clinical version of the DVA.
Dynamic Visual Acuity (DVA) test: Vestibular hypofunction leads to impaired gaze
stability due to increased retinal slip during head movement. The DVA test is a
behavioral assessment of gaze stability [82]. The clinical DVA starts with an
evaluation of static visual acuity using a Snellen or EDTRS chart by asking the
patient to read the smallest line that they can see clearly without moving their
head. Then the patient is instructed to read the lines from the top down while the
examiner passively oscillates the patient’s head ±15° to 20° at 2Hz. A difference
of 2 lines or more between the static acuity and the dynamic acuity suggests
uncompensated gaze instability [88, 89]. Computerized versions of the DVA test
were found to be more valid [83].
268
https://t.me/medicina_free
E. R. Anson and Y. Gimmon
Vestibular Conditions Manifesting These Symptoms
Unilateral Vestibular Hypofunction
Unilateral vestibular hypofunction (UVH) is the partial or complete loss of function of one or more of the vestibular organs and/or vestibular nerves on one side [8, 30]. Acute unilateral vestibular hypofunction is most commonly due to vestibular neuri­tis but other causes include: trauma, surgical nerve transection, ototoxic medication, vestibular schwannoma, superior canal dehiscence, or Meniere’s disease [8, 30, 90,
91]. Acute asymmetry in resting vestibular tone leads to sudden onset of vertigo,
nausea, and imbalance symptoms and transient spontaneous nystagmus [90, 92]. Although visible nystagmus and vertigo usually subside within hours to 14days, uncompensated UVH results in imbalance, blurry vision with head movement, diz­ziness, spatial disorientation, and difculty with path instability when walking [92–
96]. UVH may affect a person’s ability to drive, perform typical daily activities, and
work [97, 98]. Negative changes in quality of life may also lead to secondary prob­lems such as depression and anxiety as well as secondary deconditioning likely due to reduction in activity participation [99–104]. Importantly, individuals with more complete hypofunction may take longer to rehabilitate and may continue to report subjective symptoms after apparent recovery of balance ability [65]. For some peo­ple, this may result in a chronic condition called persistent postural-perceptual diz­ziness (PPPD) [105, 106]. Vestibular rehabilitation is very effective at addressing the impairments and symptoms related to unilateral vestibular hypofunction [6, 8].
Bilateral Vestibular Hypofunction
BVH is a condition caused by absent or reduced function of the vestibular organs and/or nerves of both ears. Most instances of BHV are idiopathic [107, 108]. Other causes of BVH include: trauma, aging, infectious disease, ototoxic medication, bilateral Meniere’s disease, neurodegenerative disorders, autoimmune disease, and congenital or genetic abnormalities [107–110]. Common symptoms include oscil­lopsia with head movement and imbalance, especially in the dark or on unlevel/ uneven surfaces [55, 57–59, 109]. Most individuals with severe BVH do not com­plain of vertigo. Individuals with BVH often experience difculty walking in the dark [111]. Herdman and colleagues (2000) reported that about 50% of patient with BVH had fallen since the onset of the vestibular decit [39]. Quality of life is often negatively impacted and individuals with BVH report a high socioeconomic burden due to work-related disabilities [41, 57]. Vestibular rehabilitation is effective at addressing the impairments and symptoms related to bilateral vestibular hypofunc­tion, although the rehabilitation duration typically takes longer and the level of recovery may be less complete [6, 8].
14 Vestibular Rehabilitation: APatient-Centered Approach
https://t.me/medicina_free
269
Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo
Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) is one of the most common causes of vestibular vertigo [112–114]. Loose otoconia dislodged from the utricle that end up free-oating in the semicircular canals (canalithiasis) or attached to the cupula (cupulolithiasis) are considered to be the primary cause of BPPV symptoms [115–
120]. BPPV symptoms of vertigo and imbalance are triggered by change in head
orientation to gravity (i.e., bending over, looking up, lying down, rolling in bed) [121]. Thus, the methods for differential diagnosis depend on changes in head ori­entation while aligning a set of semicircular canals in the plane of gravity [122,
123]. Many factors including age, acute vestibular loss, and trauma contribute to
otoconia becoming dislodged [124, 125]. Although BPPV has been reported in some children [126, 127], this is relatively rare and BPPV is much more common in adulthood with prevalence increasing with age [125, 128, 129].
BPPV occurs in all three semicircular canals, with the posterior canal being most commonly affected and the anterior canal being the rarest form, and each variant has many distinct treatment options [130, 131]. It is paramount for clinicians to accurately identify the affected semicircular canal since the canalith repositioning treatments are canal specic [123, 131–133]. The Dix–Hallpike test is the clinical standard for diagnosing posterior canal BPPV (see Fig.14.1) [122, 130, 134].
Some individuals may not be able to tolerate the traditional Dix–Hallpike posi­tions, thus a modied testing position in side-lying was developed that can be used in those instances (see Fig.14.2) [135–137].
The “Supine-Roll Test” (Fig.14.3) and/or the “Bow and Lean Test” are recom­mended for differential diagnosis of lateral canal BPPV [123, 138].
Readers are encouraged to reference the most current BPPV clinical practice guideline for an extensive review of recommended differential diagnostics and
a b
Fig. 14.1 Example of Dix–Hallpike testing for BPPV on the right side, (a) shows the starting position with the head rotated 45° to the right, (b) shows the testing position maintaining a 45° rightward head rotation with 20° of neck extension. The testing position should be held for 30–60s while waiting for symptoms or nystagmus. Infrared goggles can be used to improve visualization of nystagmus as shown in (b)
270
ab
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 14.2 Example of modied side-lying Dix–Hallpike testing for BPPV on the right side, (a) shows the starting position with the head rotated 45° to the left to place the right posterior canal into the plane of movement, (b) shows the testing position maintaining a 45° leftward head rotation with 20° of neck extension. The testing position should be held for 30–60s while waiting for symptoms or nystagmus. Infrared goggles can be used to improve visualization of nystagmus as shown in (b)
E. R. Anson and Y. Gimmon
treatment strategies [130]. In this section we provide a brief overview of the most commonly used diagnostic tests and the nystagmus characteristics typical for each subtype of BPPV, see Table14.1. Selected treatment strategies are described later in this chapter.
Vestibular Migraine
Vestibular migraine is a migraine in the company of vestibular symptoms. In the past it was described by other terms such as migraine-associated dizziness, migraine related vestibulopathy and migrainous vertigo. Today, the acceptable term by the Barany Society and the International Headache Society is “Vestibular Migraine” [139, 140]. Vestibular migraine is characterized by episodic events of vertigo and/or dizziness and/or unsteadiness with or without experiencing other symptoms such as nausea, tinnitus, sound sensitivity, light sensitivity, and visual disturbance [140,
141]. The symptoms can last for minutes to days with occurrences ranges from
every day to twice a year [142, 143]. Vestibular migraines can negatively affect an individual’s activity and participation, reduce quality of life, lead to work absences, and interfere with daily activities [142, 144]. Rehabilitation programs for vestibular migraine are exercise-based. There is some evidence that symptoms and functional abilities improve with vestibular rehabilitation [145–147]. However, vestibular rehabilitation is relatively underutilized, and patients should also receive appropri­ate medical management for optimum results [143].
cd
14 Vestibular Rehabilitation: APatient-Centered Approach
https://t.me/medicina_free
a b
271
Fig. 14.3 Example of Supine Roll testing for lateral canal BPPV, (a) shows the starting position with the head in midline and elevated 30°, (b) shows the testing position with the right ear down, (c) shows the head back in the neutral midline position, (d) shows the head turned with the left ear down. Each position should be held for 30–60s while waiting for symptoms or nystagmus. Infrared goggles can be used to improve visualization of nystagmus
Persistent Postural-Perceptual Dizziness
Persistent postural-perceptual dizziness (PPPD) is a functional vestibular disorder, not a structural or psychiatric vestibular disorder. PPPD is characterized with a per­sistent dizziness, nonspinning vertigo aggravated by postural challenges with reported sensitivity to space-motion stimuli [105]. PPPD often develops after peripheral or central vestibular disorders. However, it might also develop due to vestibular migraine, panic or anxiety attacks, concussion, whiplash injuries and even by autonomic disorders [148]. Many patients with PPPD report that upright posture, standing and walking, worsen their symptoms [149, 150], interfering with participation in typical daily functions. There is emerging evidence for the impor­tance of vestibular rehabilitation to address the symptoms reported by patients with PPPD [151–153].
272
https://t.me/medicina_free
E. R. Anson and Y. Gimmon
Table 14.1
Canal Positional test Nystagmus direction
Canalithiasis
Posterior Dix–Hallpike or
Lateral Supine Roll Test or
Anterior Dix–Hallpike
Cupulolithiasis
Posterior Dix–Hallpike or
Lateral Supine Roll Test or
Anterior Dix–Hallpike or
Summary of positional tests and nystagmus characteristics for different types of BPPV
side-lying
Bow & Lean
or Deep Head Hang
side-lying
Bow & Lean
Deep Head Hang
Up-beating and geotropic torsional nystagmus
Horizontal geotropic nystagmus
Down-beating±geotropic torsional nystagmus
Up-beating and geotropic torsional nystagmus
Horizontal apogeotropic nystagmus
Down-beating±geotropic torsional nystagmus
Nystagmus duration (s)
<60 5–20s
<60 5–20s
<60 5–20s
>60 Almost none
>60 Almost none
>60 Almost none
Nystagmus latency
Concussion
Concussion is a mild traumatic brain injury, with a complex pathophysiological process leading to rapid onset of short lived neurological impairments that typically resolve spontaneously [154]. Etiology of dizziness postconcussion varies. Patients might be dizzy due to post traumatic BPPV [155] or peripheral vestibular dysfunc­tion [156]; however, video head impulse testing suggests lateral semicircular canal function remains intact for many concussed adolescents [157, 158]. Whether from central or peripheral pathology gaze stability is impaired postconcussion [156, 159,
160]. Oculomotor functions such as smooth pursuit, saccades, convergence motion
of the eyes and accommodation are frequently abnormal after a mild head injury [161], leading to symptoms of dizziness. In many cases posttraumatic migraine with aura of dizziness/vestibular migraine might be a result of concussion [160]. Most patients postconcussion return to their prior level of functional within days to weeks, yet some patients have prolonged recovery that may be associated with psychiatric comorbidities such as anxiety, social withdrawal, inter personal sensitivity, and fearfulness [162–164]. Concussed individuals experiencing dizziness, imbalance, and oculomotor symptoms benet from symptom management using vestibular rehabilitation [165–168].
Mal de Debarquement Syndrome (MdDS)
MdDS, sickness of disembarkation, is a subjective perception of an oscillatory sen­sation of swaying or rocking [169–171]. Possible triggers for MdDS are disembark­ing from a moving water, air or land-based vessel (boats, airplanes, trains, etc.)
14 Vestibular Rehabilitation: APatient-Centered Approach
https://t.me/medicina_free
[169]. History of migraine, stress, medication changes, and sleep deprivation serve as contributing factors [169]. Symptoms include persistent motion when standing or lying down, especially with eyes closed. Symptoms often abate slightly during movement like walking or driving [169]. MdDS patients report reduced condence during activities of daily living [172]. There are some promising technology driven treatments for MdDS, but at the moment they remain primarily experimental [173–
176]. Traditional vestibular rehabilitation has been used to address the symptoms of
MdDS; however, reports of effectiveness are inconsistent and additional research is needed [177, 178].
273
Symptom-Based Treatment Approaches
Education
Patient education is a key element in vestibular rehabilitation. Patients are educated about their symptoms and impairments, the underlying mechanism of their pathol­ogy, potential risks, and the importance of symptom provocative treatment strate­gies improving patient buy-in and participation in home exercises [179]. In addition, patient education facilitates better self-management of aggravating factors [6]. Hillier and McDonnell reported in their Cochrane review that even a minimal approach to patient education enhances the effectiveness of vestibular rehabilita­tion [7].
Positional Vertigo
Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) is one of the most common forms of vertigo [114], and the primary treatments for BPPV emphasize using gravity to reposition otoconia debris from the affected semicircular canal [130]. Here we dis­cuss canalith repositioning treatments for the most common subtypes of BPPV fol­lowed by a brief discussion on habituation as a less preferred form of treatment for BPPV.
As we mentioned earlier, the most common type of BPPV involves loose otoco­nia in the posterior semicircular canal, diagnosed by the Dix–Hallpike test. The two most common treatment approaches for canalithiasis are the Epley (canalith reposi­tioning) maneuver and the Semont maneuver [133, 180–183]. A description of the performance for the canalith repositioning maneuver (Epley) and the Semont maneuver are provided in the captions for Fig.14.4 (Epley) and Fig.14.5 (Semont).
The efcacy (>85%) of the Epley and Semont maneuvers have been shown to be equivalent when combining the results of two studies [180]. Current evidence sup­ports canalith repositioning treatments as having greater efcacy over other tech­niques such as the Brandt–Daroff exercises [184].
274
a b
https://t.me/medicina_free
E. R. Anson and Y. Gimmon
c
d
e
Fig. 14.4 Example of the Epley treatment for left posterior canal BPPV, (a) shows the starting position with the head turned 45° to the left, (b) shows the second position with the left ear down and approximately 20° of neck extension, (c) shows the third position with the right ear down (head turned 45° to the right) and approximately 20° of neck extension, (d) shows the fourth posi­tion in side-lying with the right ear down and approximately 10° of neck exion, (e) shows the nal position seated at the edge of the mat. Each position should be held for 30–45s after vertigo/nys­tagmus stops
ab
14 Vestibular Rehabilitation: APatient-Centered Approach
https://t.me/medicina_free
275
c
Fig. 14.5 Example of the Semont treatment for right posterior canal BPPV, (a) shows the starting position with the head turned 45° to the left, (b) shows the second position with the right ear down and approximately 20° of neck extension, (c) shows the third position with the nose and left ear down and approximately 10° of neck exion, (d) shows the nal position seated at the edge of the mat. Transitions between positions are fast with abrupt stops to dislodge stuck on otoliths. Positions b and c should be held for 1–2min each after vertigo/nystagmus stops
d
The second most common form of canalithiasis involves the lateral or horizontal canal. The differential diagnosis is based on horizontal (head referenced) nystagmus during the Supine Roll Test [123]. The Bow and Lean Test can be helpful in deter­mining the affected ear [138]. Lateral canal canalithiasis can be treated with either the Supine Roll technique or the Gufoni (Vannucchi) maneuvers [185, 186]. A description of the performance for the Supine Roll technique and the Gufoni maneu­ver are provided in the captions for Fig.14.6 (Supine Roll) and Fig.14.7 (Gufoni).
The least common form of canalithiasis involves the anterior canal [187]. There are two recommended treatment techniques to address canalithiasis involving the anterior canal. The Epley maneuver has been successfully applied to treat anterior canalithiasis [188], and more recently a technique developed by Yacovino and col­leagues has met with similar success [189]. The overall effectiveness of these tech­niques for resolving positional vertigo complaints is >75% [187]. A description of the performance for the deep head hanging maneuver is provided in the captions for Fig.14.8.