Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_4606_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
15.09.2026
Размер:
16 Мб
Скачать
☆
8 Traumatic Causes ofVertigo
https://t.me/medicina_free
153
Spontaneous Perilymphatic Fistulae
A spontaneous perilymphatic stula is one that occurs without an obvious external inuence. This includes the absence of any antecedent external events such as div­ing, ying or head trauma. Using this rigid denition, the medical literature docu­ments only a very small percentage of patients developing a spontaneous perilymphatic stula [25].
Symptoms of “spontaneous” PLF are similar to those of poststapedectomy PLF—vertigo and hearing loss with Valsalva-type maneuvers (bending, straining, coughing, etc.).
In an attempt to explain the concept of spontaneous PLFs, Goodhill [26] pro­posed the following theory: An implosive (originating from Valsalva force-induced increased pressure in the middle ear) which then resulted in either the oval and or round window rupturing which then resulted in a PLF.He also postulated that an increased cerebrospinal uid (CSF) pressure could result in an explosive force resulting in a PLF.
There are some reports in which individuals were found to have PLF symptoms with no history of trauma or an antecedent event. The precise numbers of these “spontaneous” or “idiopathic” cases of PLF are hard to truly ascertain. Although many patients were termed to be suffering from PLF and were characterized as “spontaneous,” it is probably more accurate to refer to them as “idiopathic.” This is because the term “spontaneous” can have a small but signicant difference in its categorization. Occasionally some of these “spontaneous” patients will cite a sig­nicant event which they will link to the onset of the suspected PLF, including something as trivial as sneezing, straining, nose blowing, laughing, or even bending over. This loose denition has thus spawned controversy over what constitutes an idiopathic PLF.
One possible cause of idiopathic PLF may be from congenital malformations and microssure formation. Microssures can occasionally develop in multiple areas in the temporal bone. Microssures that develop between the round window niche and the posterior canal ampulla and around the oval window have been described [5]. These microssures are postulated to act as a possible cause of PLFs. Microssures can also present as a variant of normal ndings on radiological imag­ing [27] On occasion, defective temporal bone remodeling can contribute to the development of PLF [19]. Similarly, perilymph can leak through the ssula ante fenestram as well [9]. In normal human development, the ssula ante fenestram is a bony cleft present in all individuals that remodels and lls with cartilage and mes­enchymal tissue in embryological development. Should this remodeling get altered in any way this could possibly result in a patent cleft through which perilymph can leak.
An additional postulated cause of idiopathic perilymphatic stula is elevations in intracranial pressure [26]. The theory holds that increased CSF pressure is transmit­ted to the labyrinthine uids, which in turn leads to a leakage at the oval and/or round window.
154
https://t.me/medicina_free
One challenge in diagnosing PLF without an obvious contributing event is that the audiovestibular symptoms of a PLF overlap with many other clinical conditions, including third mobile window syndromes (superior or posterior canal dehiscence), vestibular migraine, endolymphatic hydrops, Meniere’s disease, Eustachian tube dysfunction, and persistent postural-perceptual dizziness. Thus, clinicians should maintain high index of suspicion for a PLF when individuals with nonspecic audiovestibular symptoms do not respond to conventional medical treatments or vestibular rehabilitation. This is particularly true when there is a history of onset of symptoms after trauma or an antecedent inciting event.
When patients present with vague auditory or vestibular complaints provided by movement, a full battery of audiologic and vestibular testing is warranted to rule out other potential causes of symptoms. These include
1. Audiometry in PLF it would demonstrate a sensorineural hearing loss
2. Cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP)
3. Electrocochleography
4. The stula test, during videonystagmography
These methods have varying sensitivity. They are helpful in localizing the affected side or in distinguishing nystagmus invoked by noise or pressure changes.
The stula sign is a clinical nding that has traditionally been used; a positive stula sign is dened as nystagmus when negative pressure is applied to the external auditory canal using Siegel’s speculum.
These basic tests though they lack specicity must be performed as base line tests in the documentation of patients suspected to be suffering from PLFs.
C. de Souza et al.
Radiological Imaging
High-resolution computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have played a signicant role in the detection of PLFs. One of the earliest described radiological signs of a PLF is a pneumolabyrinth. Small bubbles of air can be hard to visualize on a standard CT scan. Patients suspected to be suffering from PLFs should undergo high-resolution CT imaging with reformations in the coronal and sagittal planes. Fluid in the round and oval window is a reliable sign of a PLF.A study by Venkatasamy et al. [28] found that high-resolution CT scanning of the temporal bone has a sensitivity for detection of PLFs of over 80% when compared to intraoperative visualization of the suspected perilymph leak. They reported that when CT scanning and MRI were used in patients suspected to be suffering from PLFs the specicity was reported to be close 100% of cases. Some authors have found that axial and coronal CISS (constructive interference in steady state) also called FIESTA (fast imaging employing steady-state acquisition) or MPR (mag­netic resonance perfusion) sequence to be the most useful sequences in the detec­tion of PLFs. MRI was found to be very helpful and accurate in identifying congenital abnormalities that contribute to PLF formation. MRI was also found to
8 Traumatic Causes ofVertigo
https://t.me/medicina_free
signicantly reduce the need for CT imaging in children. While avoiding CT scan­ning in children will eliminate concerns with regard to radiation, MRI imaging in children will often require a general anesthetic. False-negative cases may be due to scarring or intermittent or slow leakage of uid, whereas false-positive cases were likely caused by normal hypodensities seen in the cochlea motion artifacts, or inammation. Furthermore it should be remembered that PLFs can be intermittent in nature, increasing the amount of false-negative cases. CT and MRI imaging have increased value in acute posttraumatic or postoperative patients with large PLFs. CT scanning is very helpful in ruling out other causes of third window syndrome such as superior or posterior canal dehiscence, enlarged vestibular or cochlear aqueduct, and carotid or facial nerve-cochlea stula, all of which have similar presentations to that of PLFs.
155
Biomarkers
The use of biomarkers for the detection of perilymph uid has greatly increased the accuracy of the detection of PLF by its high sensitivity. Beta-2 transferrin is actively used around the world for the diagnosis of CSF leakage, and has recently been pro­posed as a marker for perilymph. Cochlin tomoprotein (CTP) was introduced by Ikezono etal. in 2009 [29], and has been recently approved in 2020in Japan as an ELISA test for perilymph detection, though is not widely available for use. Beta-2 transferrin is a protein found in higher concentration in CSF, vitreous humor, and perilymph. While many consider it a promising biomarker for perilymph, some researchers have raised concerns regarding sample contamination with blood, blood plasma, CSF, and beta-1 transferrin. Unlike beta-2 transferrin, CTP is a protein found in perilymph. Its presence in CSF is negligible. Western blot and ELISA test­ing of uid and lavages from the middle ear for CTP shows promise as a reliable diagnostic tool for PLFs. Currently, the test is limited by the presence of CTP in blood. This could possibly represent a route for sample contamination. Lavage tech­niques and centrifugation should dilute or remove any blood in the collected in the sample so as not to affect the nal result of the CTP analysis.
Conclusions
1. Perilymphatic stulae can present in diverse ways.
2. PLFs predominant symptoms are (a) uctuating hearing loss, (b) tinnitus, (c)
Vertigo, and (d) aural fullness.
3. Idiopathic PLFs are the most difcult to prove.
4. Radiological imaging using CT scans of the temporal bone and MRI has proved
to be very valuable in the diagnosis of PLFs.
156
https://t.me/medicina_free
5. Biomarkers such as Beta-2 transferrin and cochlin tomoprotein (CTP) are prom-
ising in conrming the presence of a PLF.
6. Surgery is the treatment modality of choice when treating a conrmed PLF that
does not immediately respond to conservative measures.
C. de Souza et al.
Vertebral Artery Dissection
Christopherde Souza, AishanPatil, Rosemariede Souza, VimalSomeshwar and ManishSrivastav
Introduction
Vertebral artery dissection (VAD) is an unusual and rare cause of Cerebrovascular accident (CVA)/stroke. However, in patients younger than 45years of age, the inci­dence of VAD has been found to be higher. Signs and symptoms of VAD are not pathognomonic which makes diagnosis difcult. While spontaneous dissections are known to occur, incidental, minor trauma is usually responsible for precipitating this potentially dangerous condition.
Neck manipulation through chiropractic manipulation [30], bending of the neck, or blunt trauma causes the dissection. Spontaneous dissection is also known to occur but is far less common. The dissection of the artery may ultimately lead to a stroke which often can be delayed for days following the acute dissection.
Most of VAD are intracranial. Several reports nd that vertebral artery dissection may be responsible for around 20% of ischemic strokes in the young.
Etiology
Patients often report minor, trivial precipitating events before the onset of symp­toms. Coughing, vomiting, chiropractic procedures are frequently reported by patients before symptoms manifest themselves. Blunt trauma to the neck is also reported to be an initiating event in VAD [31]. Patients with connective tissue disor­ders like Ehlers–Danlos syndrome is the most common connective tissue disorder that can likely cause vertebral artery dissection. Twenty percent to 40% of patients with serious cervical cord injury or spine fractures will demonstrate VAD [32].
Other risk factors [33, 34] for vertebral artery dissection include:
• Forceful nose blowing
• Extension of neck for prolonged periods of time
8 Traumatic Causes ofVertigo
https://t.me/medicina_free
• Wrestling
• Hypertension
• Fibromuscular dysplasia
• Oral contraceptives
• Vasculitis. Matrix metalloproteinase (MMP-9) [35] is thought to be one of the
factors MMP 9 is a gelatinase involved in inammation in several vascular dis-
eases. Its role in VAD is unclear at this time although serum MMP 9 has been
found to be grossly elevated in the acute phase of VAD.
• Hypercholesterolemia and obesity
• Migraine
• Hypertension
157
Epidemiology
Vertebral artery dissection is thought to be the likely cause of approximately 2% of all ischemic strokes. However, in young patients, the incidence is higher and 10%–25% of the population is affected by this condition. The combined incidence of both vertebral artery and carotid artery dissections is estimated to be 2.6 per 100,000 [36]. Carotid artery dissections are more three to ve times more common than vertebral artery dissections [37].
Pathophysiology
Dissections are caused by the penetration of blood into the arterial wall through the site of injury which is the intima of the arterial wall. Blood enters the media from the site of intimal injury, The dissection then extends cranially in the same direction as the bloodstream. The intramural hematoma causes compression and compromise of the lumen of the artery. This in turn causes enlargement of the external diameter of the artery. If the dissection extends toward the adventitia, then a pseudoaneurysm (dissecting aneurysm) will likely be the result. The resulting dissecting aneurysm could likely become a source for distal thromboembolism.
Vertebral Artery Anatomy
Segment 1 starts at the rst branch of the subclavian artery until the region of the
foramina of C5–C6.
Segment 2 runs within the transverse foramina from C5/C6 until C2. Segment 3 is the tortuous segment that begins at the transverse foramina of C2 and
then loops around C1 and then passes between the atlas and the occiput. This
158
https://t.me/medicina_free
segment of the artery is encased with nerves, muscles, and the atlanto-occipital
membrane. Segment 4 is the intracranial segment; it pierces the dura at the foramen magnum
runs until the junction of the medulla and pons where it merges with the basi-
lar artery.
The majority of spontaneous dissections occur in segment 3, which at times extends to involve segment 4.
The arterial anatomy consists of three layers
(a) the intima (innermost), (b) the media (middle), and (c) the adventitia (outermost layer).
Dissection occurs when the structural integrity of the arterial wall is compro­mised. Intimal tears lead to arterial blood separating (dissecting) the layers of the arterial wall. The blood within the arterial wall results in a hematoma with clot formation. The resulting compromise in arterial blood ow results in stroke. Vertebral artery dissection can be either extracranial or intracranial. Extracranial dissections frequently occur at the distal extracranial segment near the atlas and axis. Intracranial dissections are frequently associated with subarachnoid hemor­rhage and thus are associated with a much worse prognosis. Neurological sequelae of both extracranial and intracranial dissections result in cerebral ischemia caused by thromboembolism, hypoperfusion, or a combination of both [38].
C. de Souza et al.
History andPhysical Examination
History
Patients typically present with an acute and severe unilateral neck pain and/or a headache. A history of trivial neck trauma preceding the pain will often be present. The pain is located in the occipital-cervical area of the neck.
Neurological symptoms are often delayed in onset. However, 70% of patients will have some type of neurological decit which may present late in the course of the disease.
Lateral medullary syndromes (Wallenberg Syndrome) and cerebellar infarctions are often the most common sites for VAD related strokes. Wallenberg Syndrome is dened by sensory decits affecting the trunk and extremities on the opposite side of the infarction and sensory decits affecting the face and cranial nerves on the same side as the infarction. The major neurological symptoms that occur following VAD are, dizziness, ataxia, dysphagia (cranial nerves 9 and 10 are involved), dis­equilibrium, unilateral hearing loss, dysarthria and diplopia.
Extracranial dissections often have a bruit present on palpation and are heard very clearly on auscultation. The bruit has even been reported on the contralateral
8 Traumatic Causes ofVertigo
https://t.me/medicina_free
side due to increased collateral blood ow that occurs secondarily. The distinguish­ing factor that separates patients suffering from cerebellar infarctions secondary to atherosclerotic disease is the age of the patient and the presence of pain. When the dissection is located intracranially, a subarachnoid hemorrhage is present 50% of the time [39]. This subset of patients have severe neurological symptoms and an accompanying poorer prognosis than those with extracranial dissections.
Physical Exam
The following are present in VAD
• Nystagmus and vertigo
• Truncal ataxia
• Ipsilateral loss of taste (hypogeusia) and numbness
• Horner’s syndrome
• Impaired proprioception and ne touch
• Contralateral impairment in thermal and pain sensation in the extremities
• Tongue deviation to the side of the lesion
• Internuclear ophthalmoplegia
• Ipsilateral loss of taste (nucleus and tractus solitarius)
• Hiccups
159
Radiological Imaging
MRI and CT angiography (Figs. 8.1, 8.2 and 8.3a, b) are the best modalities to evaluate VAD and remain the gold standard [40].
CT scanning and CT angiography are commonly used rst line imaging modali­ties. CT scan can demonstrate posterior fossa ischemia along with subarachnoid hemorrhage. It can also identify the site where the occluded vertebral artery or mural thrombus occurs. CT Angiography are far superior to plain CT scans because of the information it yields and should be performed. CT Angiography will identify the irregularity of the vascular lumen or thickening of the arterial wall [41]. Vascular Duplex scanning demonstrates abnormal ow in 95% of patients.
MRI is useful in detecting an intimal ap and luminal thrombosis. Hyperintensity of the vessel wall may be visualized on T1-weighted images and are considered pathognomonic of VAD.
A cerebral angiogram may be required if the MRI and CT scan have failed to reveal any pathology.
160
https://t.me/medicina_free
C. de Souza et al.
a
b
c d
Fig. 8.1 Forty-eight-year-old female with recurrent posterior circulation strokes with V4 dissect­ing aneurysm. (a) Acute right cerebellar infarct. (b) MRI contrast angiogram Recon images show­ing outpouching at right V4. (c) DSA, right VA showing dissecting aneurysm at V4 level. (d) 4D angiogram showing right VA dissecting aneurysm
Multisection CT Angiography Findings inVertebral Artery Dissection (Figs.8.1, 8.2, and8.3)
Multisection CT angiography has been found to be a very sensitive and accurate technique for the diagnosis of vertebral artery dissection. The reported sensitivity was 100% and specicity was 98%. The reported ndings are increased external diameter of the affected blood vessel and crescent-shaped mural thickening in patients suffering from vertebral artery dissection. It should be noted that these cri­teria should be applied with caution because both signs can be found in nondis­sected vertebral arteries as well. Multisection computed tomographic (CT) angiography provides very high-resolution and excellent high-contrast images of
8 Traumatic Causes ofVertigo
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 8.2 Twenty-nine­year-old male developed sudden neck pain while dancing with friends, and MRI showed patchy right posterior cerebellar infarcts. Right VA DSA demonstrates, nonow limiting short segment dissection of V2 segment (arrow)
161
the arterial lumen and wall. Two-dimensional (2D) and 3D visualization increase its value in helping diagnose the site and extent of dissection and vascular compromise.
MR imaging too demonstrated excellent sensitivity and specicity of 84% and 99%, respectively, compared with conventional angiography in diagnosis of internal carotid dissection. The criteria were an increase in the external diameter of the artery and narrowing of the lumen. It should be noted that ow void narrowing is a much less useful indicator of dissection because it can be seen in many other conditions.
Transcranial Doppler has been also been found to be a very useful tool in VAD [42]. Sonographic curves, microembolic signals (MES), and breath holding index (BHI) were found to be very useful parameters in predicting ischemic events.
Routine blood work with specic reference to the patient’s coagulation prole should be obtained.
Should radiological imaging reveal the absence of hemorrhage, anticoagulation can be then initiated.
162
https://t.me/medicina_free
C. de Souza et al.
a
Fig. 8.3 Forty-year-old female with acute left cerebellar infarcts. (a) Left V4 dissection with underline thrombus. (b) Poststenting angiogram shows improved ow across stent and into the distal circulation
b
Management
Outcomes
Stenotic-type and almost completely occlusive dissections often and frequently heal with minor residual wall abnormalities. Occlusions are likely to recanalize early. However, the outer diameter of the dissected vessel will remain much smaller when compared to that of the normal contralateral vessel. Dissecting aneurysms behave in a similar fashion. However, improvement and recovery are not as remarkable as those which occur in a dissection.
Treatment of patients suffering from a craniocervical artery dissection is contro­versial at this time because controlled studies are lacking. Administration of antico­agulants is the most frequent therapy to prevent thrombosis and embolism in extracranial dissections [43]. In intracranial artery dissections, the risks that accom­pany administration of anticoagulants may be high because of the possible risk of subarachnoid hemorrhage. Anticoagulant therapy is clearly contraindicated in cases of intracranial dissecting aneurysms with subarachnoid hemorrhage. Endovascular or surgical interventional procedures are considered [44, 45] for patients who still remain symptomatic due to thromboembolic events and in situations of dissecting aneurysm.
Should recurrences occur they often occur within the rst 4–6weeks following the onset of symptoms. After the rst month following dissection, the risk of