Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5233_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
15.09.2026
Размер:
16 Мб
Скачать
☆
330
L. O’Connell
previous mesh repairs in the patient undergoing surgery for recurrent incisional her­nia, or residual small bowel length in a patient with multiple previous small bowel resections. In the elective setting, up to date cross-sectional imaging should be sought as appropriate to delineate the anatomy and previous operative notes obtained and reviewed if possible. Previous surgical procedures are also an independent pre­dictor of septic complications in patients with Crohn’s. Relevant medications should be inquired about, specically anticoagulants such as warfarin or the family of direct oral anticoagulants; antiplatelet agents; systemic corticosteroids, mTOR inhibitors such as sirolimus, targeted therapies such as bevacizumab, and immuno­modulators such as anti-TNF agents; and SGLT2 inhibitors such as dapagliozin. These may present risks of intraoperative bleeding, wound complications such as seromas and dehiscence, and perioperative ketoacidosis respectively. Close liaison with the anesthetic team, and if appropriate, the primary medical team caring for the patient is best practice to ensure optimal patient outcomes.
Consent andShared Decision Making
Thorough counselling of the patient with regard to the rationale, risks and benets of surgery is imperative. Their ideas, concerns and expectations regarding the goals of care and desired long-term outcome to be achieved by surgery should be dis­cussed. This is especially important for procedures being undertaken for a quality of life indication. Ideally, this consultation should be undertaken in the outpatient set­ting, so that patient queries and clarications can be explored and addressed outside of the constraints of a busy elective theatre list. The consent process should also ideally be undertaken in the outpatient setting, rather than on the morning of surgery.
In the setting of emergency surgery, decision making regarding the goals of care and anticipated long-term functional outcomes remain paramount. Thorough con­sideration should be given to the expected effectiveness or futility of surgical inter­ventions, respectively. The next-of-kin and other close family members should be kept apprised of the plan and the patient’s condition, as the clinical situation and consequently surgical plan may evolve rapidly. The input of family or next-of-kin should be sought in instances where this may aid in decision-making, for example collateral history regarding the patient’s premorbid state and overall condition, pres­ence of frailty and tness for surgery. However, it is important to recall that while valuable insight may be provided by relatives and family agreement is highly desir­able, for those adult patients who lack capacity ultimately decisions regarding appropriate medical care and management rest with the treating team. Exceptions to this include where a family member or other named individual has power of attor­ney with respect to medical care, and appropriately set out advanced care directives.
31 Peri-Operative Care
331

Pre-Operative Scoring Systems

Multiple risk calculators exist which can aid in evaluating a patient’s pre-operative morbid state and predicting risk of post-operative complications, morbidity and mortality. They may pertain to the elective or emergency setting. These range from general, such as the ACS-NSQIP, P-POSSUM (Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enumeration of Mortality and Morbidity) and NELA (National Emergency Laparotomy Audit) scores, to those which may be used to predict the likelihood of specic post-operative complications, such as the CeDaR score to predict risk of overall morbidity and hernia recurrence in the setting of incisional hernia repair [1]. These represent useful adjuncts to clinical assessments, and can help inform shared decision-making with patients and their relatives when deciding on the appropriateness or otherwise of surgical interventions.

Prehabilitation

Pre-habilitation, often abbreviated as “prehab”, is an increasingly recognized approach in the medical eld aimed at optimizing a patient’s physical and psycho­logical state before undergoing surgery. This preoperative strategy is designed to enhance the individual’s overall health, with the objective of reducing postoperative complications, accelerating recovery, and improving surgical outcomes. The con­cept of pre-habilitation is grounded in a multidisciplinary approach that encom­passes physical optimisation, nutritional optimisation, psychological support, and medical management. The rationale, components, and evidence supporting pre­habilitation are an integral part of preoperative care in modern medicine.
Rationale forPre-Habilitation
Pre-habilitation is predicated on the understanding that better preoperative health status is associated with improved postoperative outcomes. Surgery represents a signicant physiological stressor that can trigger new pathology or exacerbate pre­existing disease states in patients, potentially leading to complications and pro­longed recovery times. By addressing these vulnerabilities before surgery, pre-habilitation aims to enhance the patient’s resilience to the stress of surgery, thereby facilitating a smoother and quicker postoperative recovery.
332
L. O’Connell
Components ofPre-Habilitation

Physical Exercise

A core component of pre-habilitation is a tailored exercise program designed to improve cardiovascular tness, muscle strength, and endurance. Such programs are often personalized to the patient’s baseline tness level, comorbidities, and the spe­cic demands of the upcoming surgery. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (typically abbreviated to CPET or CPEX) is frequently utilized in the elective setting for assessment and stratication of tness for surgery prior to demanding planned oper­ative interventions. In the UK, it is frequently used in patients planned for major gastrointestinal, vascular, urological or cardio-thoracic surgical procedures. Use of CPET assists in providing patients with accurate information regarding their periop­erative risk, informs surgical decision-making and helps to plan both perioperative management and post-operative care. It is a dynamic, non-invasive assessment of effectiveness of cardiac and pulmonary function at rest and during exertion. Peak oxygen consumption (VO are assessed and predict operative tness. The anaerobic threshold indicates the exertional threshold for an individual at which aerobic metabolism switches to anaerobic metabolism due to insufcient oxygen delivery to the peripheral tissues. An anaerobic threshold of less than 11ml/kg/min is the limit currently accepted as indicative of signicantly increased perioperative risk, although this varies by the particular type of surgery planned.
), anaerobic threshold (AT) and ventilatory efciency
2max

Nutritional Optimization

Adequate nutrition plays a critical role in preparing the body for surgery and recov­ery. Nutritional interventions may include oral supplementation to correct caloric and vitamin deciencies, dietary modications to support immune function and tis­sue healing, and strategies to optimize body composition. For specic indications such as bariatric surgery, patients may be placed on a protocolized very low-calorie (400–800kcal/day) diet in the week preceding surgery, with the goal of achieving rapid weight loss, primarily by reduction of body fat percentage. This has been shown to reduce visceral adipose tissue and liver volume, and is associated with improved surgical outcomes, namely reduced procedure time, reduced estimated blood loss, and shorter length of stay. Conversely, for patients with cachexia arising secondary to malignancy, malnutrition, malabsorption or compromised intestinal function such as may occur in those with obstruction, short gut syndrome or Crohn’s disease, additional nutritional support may be required in the pre-operative period. This may range from simple interventions such as high-calorie, high-protein oral nutritional supplements, to enteral feeding via nasogastric tube, to parenteral feed­ing. Although serum albumin is a poor marker of nutritional status, it is a good
31 Peri-Operative Care
marker of overall condition and indicative of likelihood of post-operative morbidity. Pre-operative hypoalbuminaemia is a well described prognostic marker for poorer outcomes and increased complication rate, including wound complications and, particularly in the setting of Crohn’s, septic complications.
333

Sarcopenia

Sarcopenia is the loss of muscle mass along with muscle strength, most frequently observed as part of the ageing and frailty process but also often evident in the con­text of advanced malignancy. It is frequently underdiagnosed, but is gaining recog­nition as a predictive marker of post-operative outcomes. The presence of pre-operative Sarcopenia is associated with an increased incidence of late post­operative complications, increased length of stay, increased 30-day mortality and a signicantly increased rate of re-admission to hospital after major surgery, includ­ing gastrointestinal, orthopedic and cardiac surgeries.

Psychological Support

Psychological readiness for surgery is an often-overlooked aspect of pre- habilitation. Interventions may include stress management techniques, counseling, and educa­tion to alleviate anxiety and depression, thereby improving post-operative compli­ance and outcomes. Direction of patients to patient-centered resources such as support groups for those with a similar history may be of assistance, especially for those with chronic conditions. The need for psychological support is especially the case for complex patients who may have undergone multiple previous surgeries and prolonged intensive care admission, such as those with abdominal catastrophe, longstanding open abdomens and enterocutaneous stulas. Psychological support, assessment and preparation is also critical for those undergoing bariatric surgery procedures, where long-term success is highly dependent not just upon a satisfac­tory technical outcome but also sustained patient motivation, compliance and engagement.

Medical Optimization

This involves managing existing chronic conditions such as diabetes, hypertension, and respiratory diseases more aggressively to ensure they are well-controlled and fully optimized at the time of surgery. It may also include smoking cessation pro­grams and alcohol reduction and cessation strategies. If patients are on medications such as systemic corticosteroids, chemotherapy or targeted immunomodulatory
334
agents such as sirolimus or bevacizamab, every effort should be made to discontinue these at least six weeks pre-operatively. Steroid use in the perioperative period is known to increase the risk of wound complications and septic complications such as anastomotic leak, while sirolimus is known to increase the risk of seroma formation and wound dehiscence. Bevacizumab, an anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody used in the setting of neoadjuvant regimens for breast cancer and metastatic colorectal can­cer, may similarly increase the risk of wound breakdown and anastomotic leak. For other medications such as anti-TNF biologic agents which may be used in the set­ting of inammatory bowel disease and rheumatological disorders, the effect on post-operative morbidity is as yet unknown.
L. O’Connell

Evidence Supporting Pre-Habilitation

A growing body of research underscores the efcacy of pre-habilitation in various surgical contexts, including orthopedic, gastrointestinal, vascular, urological and cardiothoracic surgery. Studies have demonstrated that patients who undergo preha­bilitation programs experience shorter hospital stays, reduced postoperative compli­cations, and quicker return to baseline levels of function compared to those who do not. Furthermore, pre-habilitation has been associated with a signicant reduction in healthcare costs due to fewer complications, shorter length of stay and readmissions.
Implementation Challenges andConsiderations
Despite its benets, the implementation of pre-habilitation programs faces several challenges. These include identifying those patients who are likely to derive the most benet from prehabilitation programmes, developing and standardizing inter­vention protocols, and ensuring patient compliance. Additionally, there is a need for further research to optimize pre-habilitation strategies, especially for the most co­morbid patients, and to establish individualized guidelines for the various surgical procedures.

Conclusion

Pre-habilitation represents a paradigm shift in preoperative care, emphasizing the proactive optimization of patients’ health before surgery. By adopting a holistic approach that includes physical, nutritional, psychological, and medical interven­tions, pre-habilitation seeks to enhance patients’ physical strength and resilience, thereby improving surgical outcomes and facilitating recovery. As the evidence base
31 Peri-Operative Care
335
for pre-habilitation continues to grow, it is likely that such programs will become an integral part of standard preoperative care, tailored to the needs of individual patients and specic surgical procedures.

Reference

1. Fligor J, Lanier ST, Dumanian GA. Current risk stratication systems are not generalizable across surgical technique in midline ventral hernia repair. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017;5(3):e1206. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001206.
Chapter 32
Management ofthePatient inthePost- Operative Setting
LaurenO’Connell
Abstract As in the pre-operative setting, some components of post-operative man-
agement will be specic to the procedure undertaken, but many other elements of post-operative care are generalizable and relevant to any surgical procedure. The core considerations include: Management of post-operative pain and provision of appropriate analgesia, via a suitable mode of delivery, venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and others.
Keywords Post-operative · Management · Sheet · Examination · Prophylaxis · Venous · Thrombosis · Pain As in the pre-operative setting, some components of post-operative management will be specic to the procedure undertaken, but many other elements of post­operative care are generalizable and relevant to any surgical procedure. The core considerations include:
• Management of post-operative pain and provision of appropriate analgesia, via a suitable mode of delivery.
• Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis—mechanical and pharmacological.
• Early mobilization and physiotherapy input as required.
• Management and timing of removal of drains, indwelling lines (such as central, arterial) and urinary catheters.
• Delivery of nutrition in the post-operative period. Consideration of the most appropriate route of feeding (oral, enteral or parenteral) and anticipated interval until return of gut function.
L. O’Connell (*) SVUH, Dublin, Ireland e-mail: laurenoconnell@rcsi.ie
Switzerland AG 2024 A. Farag et al. (eds.), Clinical Surgical Skills Made Easy,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-69158-4_32
337© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature
338
L. O’Connell
Role ofERAS Protocols
Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) programs have become widely adopted over the past two decades. Initiating with use in elective colorectal surgery, they have now been taken up for a broad spectrum of surgical procedures [1]. Such pro­grams represent a paradigm shift in perioperative care, aiming to optimize patient outcomes through a multidisciplinary, evidence-based approach. These protocols focus on reducing the physiological Sequelae and psychological stress of surgery, with the goal of accelerating recovery, minimizing complications, and shortening hospital stays. This comprehensive discussion delves into the principles of ERAS, with a particular focus on its application in bariatric, colorectal, and esophageal surgeries.
Introduction toERAS
ERAS protocols encompass preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative strate­gies designed to maintain homeostasis, enhance pain control, reduce physiological surgical stress, and facilitate early mobilization and nutrition. The core elements include patient education, optimization of nutrition, minimizing fasting, use of mul­timodal analgesia to reduce opioid use, early enteral feeding, early mobilization, and early removal of drains and catheters. Prescription of pre-operative carbohy­drate containing drinks has been shown to ameliorate the endocrine and metabolic stress response to surgery, as well as reducing the pre-operative discomfort and distress which may be associated with prolonged fasting. Where possible, avoid­ance of placement of indwelling drains and nasogastric tubes is preferred, in order to facilitate early oral intake and mobilization. Recent data from multiple studies has demonstrated that this approach is safe and does not result in increased patient morbidity. Use of parenteral nutrition and intravenous uids is minimized, and early post-operative oral intake is encouraged. Early mobilization is similarly encour­aged; this improves respiratory morbidity by increasing oxygenation and reducing alveolar collapse, thus minimizing the incidence of atelectasis and consequent lower respiratory tract infections. Early mobilization also has a signicant role to play in reducing the risk of venous thromboembolism.
ERAS inBariatric Surgery
Bariatric surgery presents unique challenges due to the patient population’s specic needs, including higher risks of complications due to obesity and metabolic-related comorbidities. ERAS protocols in bariatric surgery focus on:
32 Management ofthePatient inthePost-Operative Setting
339
Patient education on lifestyle changes post-surgery, nutritional assessments, and
psychological evaluations are crucial. Prehabilitation, including physical exercises and dietary adjustments, is strongly encouraged in order to enhance postoperative recovery.
Minimally invasive techniques such as laparoscopic or robotic approaches are
preferred to reduce pain, wound complications, and length of hospital stay. Intraoperative uid management is optimized as per a goal-directed paradigm to avoid uid overload and electrolyte imbalances.
Early mobilization is emphasized to reduce the risk of DVT and PE, which is
especially high in the bariatric population, and represents the commonest complica­tion seen in the post-operative period. Twice daily low molecular weight heparin is administered as a weight based regimen. Intraoperatively, thrombo-embolic deter­rent stockings (TEDS) and sequential compression devices (SCDs) are used; use of TEDs should continue post-operatively. Multimodal pain management strategies, including the use of non-opioid analgesics, are employed to facilitate early ambula­tion and reduce pulmonary complications. Early initiation of liquid diets, progress­ing to solid foods as tolerated over a period of weeks, is recommended to support nutritional needs and weight loss objectives.
ERAS inColorectal Surgery
ERAS protocols originated for use in the setting of elective colorectal surgery. Colorectal surgery can signicantly benet from ERAS protocols, given the high volume and the potential for complications. Key components include:
Pre-operative counseling and stoma education by a stoma nurse (if applicable)
are provided. Combined mechanical bowel preparation with oral antibiotic decon­tamination is selectively used, typically for left sided rather than right sided resec­tions. This has been shown to result in reduced supercial and deep space wound infections, reduced septic complications, reduced incidence of post-operative C. dif­cile infection and reduced anastomotic leak rates. As with other ERAS protocols, carbohydrate loading with clear carbohydrate pre-operative drinks is permitted up until 2h prior to the procedure to maintain an anabolic rather than catabolic state, reduce perioperative insulin resistance and reduce postoperative nausea.
As with bariatric surgery, minimally invasive surgical techniques such as robotic
or laparoscopic approaches are preferred where feasible. Active warming is used to prevent hypothermia, and again goal-directed uid therapy is employed to maintain euvolemia while avoiding volume overload. Early removal of catheters and drains is preferable in order to reduce infection risk and promote mobilization. Indeed, data from the literature suggests that avoidance of routine intra-abdominal drain place­ment is safe in the setting of colorectal surgery and enhances early recovery due to reduction of pain and facilitation of mobilization. While nasogastric tubes may be utilized Intraoperatively, these may be removed at the conclusion of the surgical procedure. Early oral feeding within 24h post-surgery is encouraged to stimulate
340
L. O’Connell
bowel function and minimize the incidence of post-operative ileus, while use of parenteral nutrition and intravenous uid delivery is preferentially avoided. Multimodal analgesia, avoiding excessive use of opioids, facilitates early ambula­tion. Patient controlled analgesia is frequently employed, allowing opioid delivery to be tailored to the individual patient’s needs. Avoidance of epidural analgesia or the use of ‘walking’ epidurals again facilitates early mobilization and minimizes the likelihood of prolonged connement to the bed, thus reducing the incidence of atel­ectasis and respiratory infections.
ERAS inEsophageal andGastric Surgery
Esophageal and gastric surgery, given its complexity and the potential for signi­cant morbidity, requires tailored ERAS protocols. As the etiology of esophageal malignancy and many other upper gastrointestinal disorders is strongly linked to alcohol intake and smoking, many of these patients have signicant cardio­respiratory morbidity also related to these risk factors. Many patients will have weight loss, sarcopenia and cachexia due to dysphagia or from the presence of advanced malignancy. They may also frequently have undergone neoadjuvant treat­ment with systemic chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy prior to surgery as part of their treatment paradigm. Components of esophageal surgery ERAS protocols typi­cally include:
Preoperatively, nutritional optimization is crucial due to the high prevalence of
preoperative malnutrition and cachexia in esophageal and gastric cancer patients. This may entail supplemental feeding via oral supplements, nasogastric or nasoje­junal tube feeding or parenteral nutrition, if feeding via an enteral route is not fea­sible due to the disease process. Preoperatively, pulmonary function testing and assessment of structural cardiac health via echocardiography and ECG is performed. Patients also routinely undergo cardiopulmonary exercise testing as described above, to assess their capability to withstand operative intervention and predict post-operative morbidity risks. Physiotherapy and respiratory exercises are recom­mended to improve postoperative pulmonary function.
Intraoperatively, minimally invasive oesophagectomy (MIE) is increasingly
favored over open procedures. Open thoracotomy which is required for three-stage esophageal procedures is associated with substantial post-operative pain and thus carries a signicant risk of respiratory morbidity due to splinting of the diaphragm and difculty in engaging with physiotherapy. Minimally invasive approaches result in reduced postoperative pain and thus respiratory complications. Robotic approaches are favored due to the surgical limitations presented by the xed bony compartment of the thoracic cavity, although laparoscopic approaches are also in use and effective. Careful anesthetic management is essential to maintain hemody­namic stability, identify potential complications such as iatrogenic pneumothorax early and reduce pulmonary morbidity.