Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5232_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
15.09.2026
Размер:
16 Мб
Скачать
☆
  
The sensational saga ran for a few months, until in­evitably Toft was rumbled. A porter was caught smug­gling a rabbit into her room. And, to the embarrassment of many distinguished medical men, Toft confessed to Douglas, implicating others in the hoax. The exact mo­tive is a mystery, as is whether Toft was coerced into this dreadful ordeal. Though it’s unlikely she acted alone, or voluntarily.
What is for sure, is that the pitiful creatures were in­serted into Toft’s vagina, for the doctors to pull a rabbit out of the hat, so to speak.
Pudendal nerve
How we’re hardwired to say jay-jay, giney, weenie, winky, and worse
You can’t see The Great Wall of Vulva from space. As great walls go, it’s on the small side. But the - meter­long ( feet) sculpture featuring plaster casts of four hundred vulvas certainly makes a big impression. This out-there exhibition of vulval variety, on show in Miami, Florida, in , is a refreshing antidote to the shame many people feel about their “privates.”
It’s shame that’s hardwired into us from birth. Pri­vate parts are to be neither seen nor heard. So we coun­terbalance the weight of our shame by making light of our genitals, with genteel euphemisms—jay-jay, winkie, willy, wiener, thingy, downstairs, and so on—and an almost infinite variety of vulgar nicknames, dick names, and chick names. A UK survey found  percent of young women had a problem saying “vulva” or “va­gina.” Body parts that dare not speak their name.
  
This shameful avoidance is, frankly, dangerous. Chil­dren may be less likely to be sexually abused if they know and use the correct anatomical names for their genitals, research shows. A  study found some per­petrators avoided these kids because it indicated they’d been educated about body safety and sexuality.
Knowing the correct anatomical names also helps children successfully disclose abuse. “He touched my mun” may not elicit the same concern as “He touched my vulva.”
Tellingly, shame also dominates our anatomy, as well as our vocabulary. Shame is hardwired into our genitals via our pudendal nerves.
They—one on each side—are pleasure nerves, carry­ing sensations from the penis and scrotum, much of the vulva, and lower part of the vagina. They’re also indis­putably our most shameful nerves. “Pudendal” is from the Latin word “pudere,” meaning “to be ashamed.” As is “pudendum,” another word for “vulva.” (Vulva is the name for the female external genitalia: labia majora and minora, clitoris, and the opening of the vagina, among other things.)
Pudendum can apply to men’s, as well as women’s, genitals. Though, perhaps not surprisingly, the term is mostly reserved for women, sparing guys some of the naming and shaming. Because of its shameful roots, pudendum was banished from ocial anatomical ter­minology in .
So, while it’s good for kids to be au fait with their genitals’ anatomical names, they can steer clear of “pu­dendum” and perhaps also “pudendal nerve.”
 
Putamen
How deux is better than one Si vous maîtrisez ces deux langues, lire deux fois la même chose (voir phrase adjacente) peut être un peu fastidieux. If
you are proficient in both of these languages, reading the same thing twice (see adjacent sentence) can be a bit tedious.
But there is an upside. Your bilingual brain is mag- nifique. Learning a second language induces changes in the brain that may give you advantages over people for whom double Dutch is the closest they’ll get to bilingual.
“The neuroanatomical [brain] changes in bilinguals result in enhanced executive functions, greater mental flexibility and an increased capacity for conflict resolu­tion beyond that relating to language,” a review of the consequences of bilingualism said.
Importantly, the changes in brain gray and white matter may slow the decline in memory and thinking that occurs as we age, and help prevent Alzheimer’s disease. Among people with Alzheimer’s, bilinguals are diagnosed four to five years later than those who speak one language.
But if you are bilingual, don’t think you’re the crème de la crème. Au contraire. It’s estimated that over half the world’s population can speak two or more languages.
Lots of bits of the brain are involved in language processing, interpretation, and production. Having a second language induces changes in many, for example, the left putamen. (In most people, the brain’s left side is dominant for language.) The putamen is a largish struc­ture deep below the surface of each brain hemisphere.
 
Its raison d’être has traditionally been thought to be its important role in controlling movement. However, re­cent studies suggest it’s involved in a wider variety of functions.
Research in people who spoke more than one lan­guage found they had increased density of gray matter in their left putamen. One of the brain changes thought to be beneficial in bilinguals. And, if you parles français, sprichst Deutsch, or parli italiano, as well as English, keep practicing. The more proficient you are in your second language, the greater the putamen’s gray matter density.
For much of the twentieth century, many experts thought learning a second language was a handicap for children. There were concerns it was a mental burden, making kids confuse their languages, and impairing their intelligence.
In the s, there was a volte-face, after a Cana­dian study found that children who spoke English and French had better verbal and nonverbal intelligence than their monolingual mates. If you were bilingual, and prone to tiresome repetition, you’d say, “C’est fan- tastique. That’s fantastic.”
Pylorus
How bacterial broth trumped gut instinct
Don’t believe the hyper. Sugar doesn’t turn kids into uncontrollable, hyperactive monsters. Chewing gum doesn’t stick around in the stomach for seven years. And spicy foods don’t cause stomach ulcers. Popular medical fantasies. Debunked by reality.
Fact is, candy messes with parents’ brains, not their kids’. Of twelve high-quality studies looking at kids’
 
Pyloric sphincter
Stomach
Pylor
us
reactions to diets with dierent amounts of sugar, none found it aected behavior. But if parents think their kids have had a sugary drink, they say the little monkeys are more hyperactive, even if the drink was sugar-free. As for gum, it just goes through us. And most stomach ulcers are caused by a bacterium called Helicobacter pylori.
H. pylori is named after its looks and location. It’s helix-shaped and was first discovered in the lower part of the stomach, which includes the pylorus.
“Pylorus” is from the Greek for “gatekeeper.” Your stomach’s pylorus guards the gates to the rest of your guts. Here, a ring of muscle—pyloric sphincter— regulates the flow of food into the small intestine.
 
Before it leaves, strong acid and digestive enzymes break down the food. What’s remarkable is that they don’t also make a meal of you, digesting yourself from the inside. To stop us becoming a sickening flesh-and­sinew smoothie, our stomach wall is coated with a pro­tective layer of viscous mucus. Mucus that H. pylori calls home.
The stomach’s inhospitable interior doesn’t suit many bacteria, but H. pylori cleverly uses its shape to corkscrew into the safety of the mucus. Once there, it usually keeps itself secret: most infected people don’t have symptoms, thankfully, bearing in mind that over  percent of human stomachs worldwide are colonized with H. pylori. Usually we’re infected as a kid, likely from our mum, and the bacteria may keep us company our whole life.
Not so long ago, this savvy stomach squatter was a bacterial small potato, unknown in fact. It’s a big cheese today thanks to two Australian doctors, Robin Warren and Barry Marshall. They won a Nobel Prize in  for discovering H. pylori and its role in stomach ulcers.
However, they did their discovering back in the s. At that time, the idea that H. pylori and stom- ach ulcers were connected was beyond belief for many medics. They snootily stuck to the prevailing doctrine that lifestyle factors like stress and spicy foods caused the problem. To help convince the dyspeptic skeptics, Marshall made himself sick to the stomach by drinking broth teeming with H. pylori.
Turns out, spicy curries don’t give you ulcers. Bac­teria soup does.
  
uadratus plantae
How good eggs hold the secret to immortality
Q
viuses, and the worst of Sylviuses. Two eminent anat­omists named Sylvius, whose stories hold the secret to eternal life. And it begins, not with their immortal souls, but with the thick-skinned soles of their feet.
your toes flex. Jacobus Sylvius, a top sixteenth-century anatomist, first named it. The Frenchman actually called it “massa carnae,” a label later consigned to the anatomical trash can. Jacobus named many other parts of us, like our biceps and triceps muscles. He was also among the first to write about a brain part called the ce­rebral aqueduct, also known as the aqueduct of Sylvius.
ciscus Sylvius, a German-born anatomist who lived over a hundred years after the Frenchman. Franciscus Syl­vius also gave his name to many other bits of your anat­omy, like the Sylvian fissure (aka lateral sulcus), a deep groove that runs along each side of your brain. Whereas Jacobus Sylvius doesn’t seem to be immortalized in any part of you. Even a part he did first describe is associ­ated with a contemporary: Bartolomeo Eustachi’s Eu­stachian valve, at the entrance to the heart’s right side.
Jacobus Sylvius, dead to us? Ostracized from our in­sides. Eponymously anonymous.
ability, productivity, or originality. The crucial dier­ence was their likability. Franciscus was popular with his students. Unlike the petulant, intolerant, vindictive
This is a tale of two Sylviuses. The best of Syl-
Quadratus plantae is a muscle in the sole that helps
But this Sylvius in our brain isn’t Jacobus. It’s Fran-
So why is Franciscus Sylvius living on inside us, and
The answer has nothing to do with their relative
Front
  
Back
Sylvian ssure
(lateral sulcus)
Jacobus. And at that time, students would honor re­spected teachers by naming parts of us after them, even if they weren’t the first to describe them.
Jacobus’s exile from the anatomy textbooks was sealed thanks to his feud with one particular student. This was no minor ti. This was a full-on, scalpels-at­dawn dustup. And Jacobus certainly went the extra bile. He even begged the Holy Roman Emperor Charles V to punish the student, “this worst example of ignorance, ingratitude, arrogance, and impiety, to suppress him so that he may not poison the rest of Europe with his pestilential breath.”
This was a spectacular fail. The sacrilegious student with horrible halitosis was none other than Andreas Ve­salius, now recognized as one of the greatest anatomists ever. The “founder of modern anatomy.” In the quest
   
for anatomical immortality, Jacobus Sylvius had egg on his face, while Franciscus Sylvius was a good egg. And (hopefully) good eggs take the cake.
ecurrent laryngeal nerve
How giraes are a pain in the neck
R
If the average IQ is , then God’s must be way o the charts. After all, he is omniscient, omnipotent, and omnipresent, at least according to traditional Christian belief. All-knowing, all-powerful, and everywhere. Not even AI can boast that, yet.
creationists’ arguments against evolution. They maintain that a hyper-brainy deity created all life, pretty much as we know it today, instead of it gradually evolving. They call this “intelligent design.” Trouble is, if divine design was responsible for your recurrent laryngeal nerves, then God isn’t as smart as they’d like to think he is.
control most of the muscles in your voice box (larynx), among other things. Damage to one can cause a hoarse voice. Their fibers originate in the brain. But they don’t take the short route to the larynx, as the crow flies, as an intelligent designer would surely have stipulated on the blood-stained blueprints. They take a dumb detour.
stem, at the brain’s base, inside the left and right vagus nerves, which run down the neck. The right recurrent laryngeal nerve branches o the right vagus near the root of the neck. The left one branches from the left vagus, a little further down, in the chest. Both then do
for evolution’s opponents
God’s infinite smarts are the foundation for some
Your recurrent laryngeal nerves—left and right—
The recurrent laryngeal nerves’ fibers exit the brain-
   
a U-turn, looping under large blood vessels and going back up the neck to the larynx. Hence the name “recur­rent,” which means “turned back to run in the opposite direction.”
This neck trek can be explained by our development in the womb. The nerves appear early, before we have a neck. As our neck grows, the nerves are dragged down, away from the head, forcing them to get longer and longer to maintain the connection to the larynx.
It’s unintelligent design.
But our recurrent laryngeal nerves aren’t the ones usually held up to help refute intelligent design. All four­limbed vertebrates (animals with a backbone) have this inecient U-turn. And one of these has seven vertebrae in its neck that are so large, their recurrent laryngeal nerve fibers are almost  meters ( feet) long. That would be the girae, whose necks can grow to up to . meters ( feet).
Human and girae recurrent laryngeal nerves: dumb, and dumber.
Rods and cones
How we’re all visionaries, even if we’re mistaken about Jesus
Why did Isaac Newton stick a bodkin into his eye? How did the scientific superstar get the bodkin in? And what on Earth is a bodkin?
Newton wasn’t your average, run-of-the-mill ge­nius. One of history’s most influential scientists, he was hyper- obsessive, never afraid to ask the hard questions, then go the extra mile, and eyeball, for answers. As well as developing his law of gravity, the Englishman was visionary about vision, proving that light is made of a