Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5907_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
15.09.2026
Размер:
16 Мб
Скачать
☆
224
Nano Physical Pharmaceucs of Microsphere Delivery System
drug-carrying microspheres with high embedding rate and high drug activity. Using a nearly monodisperse high molar mass poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAM) sample, Wu et al. successfully changed the conformation of a single PNIPAM chain from curl to a fully collapsed stable single-chain globule in extremely dilute aqueous solution, which enabled us to study the transition from globule to curl of a single homopolymer chain
            
later study of the stability of microspheres in solution. Qi et al. [64] prepared uniform-sized PLGA microspheres by Shirasu porous
       
exenatide, a drug for treating Type 2 diabetes. The experimental results showed that the hypoglycemic rate of the exenatide

blood glucose returned to the level of the control group (normal saline group) after the 14th day of drug administration was      took thymosin as the model drug, optimized the concentration of internal aqueous phase, oil phase
      
aqueous phase pH, and prepared thymosin loaded microspheres with an average particle size of 24 µm and uniform particle size
        
combined with solvent evaporation method, and the embedding
                     
investigated. The results showed that with the increase of the molecular weight of PLGA, the burst rate of microspheres decreased, and the whole release process was closer to zero­order release. And because the preparation process of membrane
              
Protein drug sustained-release microspheres. Protein drugs have high molecular weight, complex structure, easy denaturation and inactivation under severe preparation conditions, and poor
             
can solve this problem. Zhang et al. [66] used insulin as a model
           
NPP of Microspheres
225
       
curing process. The oral calcium alginate chitosan microspheres
         
can mildly prepare lotion with uniform size, so as to retain the
         
gastrointestinal tract. In the experiment of diabetes rats, the prepared insulin-loaded oral microspheres have a continuous

Small molecule drug sustained-release microspheres.
        
easy to escape quickly during the preparation of microspheres due to their small molecular weight, which leads to a decrease in the entrapment rate. To solve this problem, the researchers obtained emulsion droplets with uniform particle size through
     
ripening in the curing process, and ensuring high embedding rate
         
(RVC) as the model drug and prepared a uniform drug-loaded
                        
terminal groups (hydroxyl, carboxyl, ester) on drug loading were investigated on a controlled basis. The hydroxyl-terminated ropivacaine microspheres exhibit the best long-term analgesic

6.4.5.2 Application of uniform drug-loaded microspheres in
vaccine preparation
             
application and charge. The aspect of protection and avoidance
          
extent of the manufacturing of antibody responses are intently linked to mode of application. Biodegradable delivery technology for vaccines which are administered by the intravenous path may resolve the shortcomings of the same conventional vaccines.
226
Nano Physical Pharmaceucs of Microsphere Delivery System
         
technology. The water phase is an antigen solution and the
         
lotion preparations with uniform particle size have a stronger immune response than preparations with wide particle size distribution.
6.4.5.3 Application of uniform drug-loaded microspheres in
the treatment of malignant tumors

and bioavailability in the human body. Therefore, large doses are required to increase the probability of reaching the tumor site, as shown in Fig. 6.6. Based on the enhanced capability
         
passively targeted. Therefore, nanosphere (NP) preparations are
                                        
double emulsion method combined with rapid membrane
           
homogeneous chitosan nanospheres (CNPs) with a particle size
        
technology, and realized co-encapsulation of doxorubicin (DOX), PTX and Fe3O4 nanocrystals by combining O/W/O double
     
The CNPs with uniform particle size are loaded with hydrophobic taxol, doxorubicin and iron oxide nanocrystals Fe3O4 at the same
      3O4 and                    
killing role. The actual results showed that the three-week
  
which was far higher than other control groups, showing a good
         
nanospheres was used to introduce a polyethylene glycol

Summary and Perspective

227
         
targeting tumor cells to prepare a paclitaxel nano drug delivery carrier (RGDPEG-CNP: PTX) with both stealth and targeting capabilities. The experimental results show that the drug delivery preparation with uniform size nanospheres can improve the

Figure 6.6 Schematic of the general in vivo fate of the microsphere from injection site to tumor.
6.5 Summary and Perspective
      
as changes in the living environment, the aging society, the development of medicine, cognitive concepts and so on, the disease
       
tumors, cardiovascular diseases, diabetes and mental diseases have increased rapidly, which will greatly increase the consumption of medical resources. Microspheres have the advantages of
                   
demand will be on the rise.
One of the important directions for the development of drug dosage forms is to improve the targeting of drugs. At present, there are new and gratifying achievements in the research of drug microspheres targeting, such as nano-microspheres, magnetic
228
Nano Physical Pharmaceucs of Microsphere Delivery System
microspheres, bioadhesion microspheres and antibody-mediated microspheres. Nano-microspheres are easier to pass through the gastric mucosa, intestinal mucosa, nasal mucosa and even the
         
being paid to them at present. The magnetic microspheres prepared by magnetic properties have magnetic responsiveness,
         
Bioadhesive microspheres prepared by using adhesive materials such as deacetylated chitosan and polycarboxyethylene can improve the absorption of drugs at the biological mucosa. Absorption accelerators such as microspheres co-carrier lysophospholipid or protease inhibitors are used to improve the
       
of antigen-antibody is used to prepare antibody microspheres, which can improve the targeting of drugs. In addition, the development and application of new natural polymer materials
        
progress of microsphere preparations and provides corresponding theoretical guidance and basis for related work in the future. Hopefully, with a deeper understanding of microspheres, new approaches will be developed to conquer the obstacles in the preparation and application process.
References
1. Kim HK, Park TG, J Control Release 2004, 98
2. Sun Y, Zhang C, Mao Y, Pan D, Qi D, Di N, New Journal of Chemistry 2019, 43
3. Tuttolomondo MV, Villanueva ME, Alvarez GS, Desimone MF, Díaz LE, Biotechnology Letters 2013, 35
4. Nicholson, Linda K, Tetsuo A, Makoto D, Timothy AC, Biopolymers CTJ,
1993, 33
  Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 2012, 64,

6. Dupin D, Fujii S, Armes SP, Reeve P, Baxter SM, Langmuir 2006, 22
 
Advanced Materials 2020, 32
References
229
8. Phillippi JA, , , eabl6364.
, 

Leong KW,
 ,

40
Science Advances
 
Nature Reviews Materials

  
XS,
Artificial Cells, Blood Substitutes, and Biotechnology 2004
2022
8
2022
 
, 1–18.
New Journal of Chemistry 2016
32
DG,
Pharmaceutics
Arti
ficial
Saha
2018
Cells
S,
, 548
Blood
, 34–48.
Chowdhury
Substitutes and Biotechnology
M, International Journal

Colloids , and
Surfaces
A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 2011, 373,
 
,
1990
Mandal
Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics


2008
, 1


24
T, Bostanian L, Graves
Journal
R,
of
Biomedical
Chapman
    
, 413–416.
Materials Research
S, Idodo
2001
T,
, 
52ChemSusChem
Velegol D, Jensen L, Huang TJ,
ACS Nano


 
, 
2011
5

Drug Development Research
 
Journal
of Power Sources
2005 64
, , 114–128.

Chemical Society
McGinity JW,
, 
2006 128
Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 1997
KS,
Journal of the American

Sivakumar M,
Ultrasonics Sonochemistry

, , 131461.
2022 309
International

The Journal of

of Pharmaceutics
2019 563
 
Physical Chemistry B
Materials Letters
247

cht
, 

    
2004
108
2004 32
European
2009 189
, ,
28
2004, 11, , ,
,
of
,
230
Nano Physical Pharmaceucs of Microsphere Delivery System
28. Li X, Wang B, Liu Q-J, Zhao R, Song D-P, Li Y, , ,
Langmuir 2021 37



8
ACS Biomaterials
  
Science

& Engineering 2021
2014 304
, ,

31. Boström M, Williams D, Ninham B,

87
Physical
P,
Review Letters 2001
ACS Omega 2020 5
, ,

33. Qiu X, Kwan CMS, Wu C,
Physical Review Letters
Physical Review Letters
X, Zhang L, Wu C,
Macromolecules 1997 30
1998 80
1996 77
, 
, 

,
Biomacromolecules 2004,

 
Chemical Society Reviews
38. Wang, Kou X,
J,
Yang
Zhang
Z, Xu J, Ahmad M,
B,



2015
,
44
Macromolecular

 

Zhang H,
Rapid
Zhang A, Zhang Q,
Communications
2019 40
, , ,

      
Advanced
Cell 1995
Materials 2000
, 81

, 12(10)27,

Abdekhodaie, J, Wu
41. Mohammad
XY,
Biomaterials 2006
, ,

42. Dhakar RC, Maurya SD, Sagar
Der Pharmacia Lettre


 
58

ANF,
,
2013 165
Pack DW, Braatz RD,

,
2010
2Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 2006
BP, Bhagat S, Prajapati

Journal

of Controlled Release
Procedia Computer Science
SK, Jain CP,
2019, , 158, 436–442.
46. Son G-H,
2017
47
2019,
Lee B-J, Cho C-W,
Journal Pharmaceutical
of Investigation

Frontiers of Chemical and Engineering

13
Science
,
,
5,
,
,
References
231
48. Lee BK, Yun Y, Park K, , ,
Advanced
Drug
Delivery
Reviews 2016 107


Biointerfaces
 
PJ,
Liechty
Neurosurgery
,
2018, 172
Journal of Chemotherapy , 

 
B,
Pisapia
2021
 
D, Ramakrishna
, 
135
, 
Reviews Drug Discovery 2005
   
Pharmaceutics 1985
, , 333–344.
   23  
Singh PK, Singh U,
 
Anesthesia & Analgesia 2004 99
Journal of the American Medical Association 1927,

2001
    
4, 331–344.

Colloids
and Surfaces B:
R, Wernicke 13AG,
  
International
 
, 
Journal of
Nature
Journal
of

88

          
Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition 1997
  
 
Composite
and Engineering
 
   
Microspheres,
2020



IOP Conference Series: Materials Science
768



 
,
8

 
 , ,
Science
Journal of
 
1993

261
 
M,
Pharmacology
  , 


Mori
Weidekamm
2000
MR, Kozlowski PA,
 
E, Reigner
,
45
Veterinary Record 2003 152
 
Nature Reviews Immunology 2006 6
 
B,
Cancer Chemotherapy
 
and
, ,

,
2004 32
Da Silva-Cunha A,
, 626–632.
Clinical
& Experimental Ophthalmology
JL, Concheiro
A, Alvarez-Lorenzo
C,
Polymers 2020, 12
G, Su Z,
Pharmaceutical
Research 2014, 31
 CIESC Journal 2021, 72
,
232
Nano Physical Pharmaceucs of Microsphere Delivery System
66. Zhang Y, Wei W, Lv P, Wang L, Ma G,
ceutics and Biopharmaceutics ,  
       
2011
77
Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects
X, Wei Y, Wen K, Han Q, Ogino K, Ma
Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics
      , 
International Immunopharmacology


 
De Filippis
Clinical Practice
     
Biomaterials 2013, 34
  
Nanoscale
2015


L, Bonizzoni
2012 66
, 
         


            
, 7
E, Qu
2014


adrini
        Molecular
Pharmaceutics 2012, 9

European

2019
2021
Journal of Pharma-
Colloids and Surfaces A:

,
562
G,
European
,

160
   
23
    
S, International Journal
Journal
  
of
of

Index

absolute temperature 2, 19, 39,
57, 168
     

162, 201, 205, 209
 
 
apoptosis 150
         

AuNPs, see
           
    
      
 

Brownian movement 131
     
222
        
 
 
 
      
226
   
103, 109, 163
  see
 see  

 