Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_4597_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
15.09.2026
Размер:
17 Мб
Скачать
☆
Tracheostomies
12
might require bronchoscopic pulmonary toilette after admission (e.g., due to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or airway burns), consider increasing to a 9.0-mm ID tube for men or an 8.0-mm ID tube for women.
■
It is physiologically important to note that the upper part of the trachea is extrathoracic, whereas the lower half is intrathoracic. This relation­ship creates different behaviors during inspiration and expiration. The extrathoracic trachea, which is subject to the effects of ambient atmo­spheric pressure, decreases slightly in caliber during inspiration and increases during expiration. By contrast, the intrathoracic trachea un­dergoes expansion during inspiration as a result of negative intratho­racic pressure transmitted from the pleural cavity. During expiration, however, surrounding pleural pressure diminishes the tracheal caliber, which may be exaggerated in the setting of marked increased expiratory effort in airway obstruction.
■
Forces affecting airflow through the airways can be categorized as those that facilitate airflow and those that oppose it. In general, differences in pressure drive airflow in and out of the respiratory system from areas of higher to lower pressure. The lung contains two different pressure systems, whereas the chest wall exerts a separate one. The force driving airflow is the difference between the airway opening, or mouth (Pm), and the pressure in the alveoli (Palv) and the pleural space (Ppl). The differ­ence between these two pressures is called the transpulmonary pressure (PL, the pressure across the lung). The pressure across the chest wall (Pcw) is the difference between the pleural pressure (Ppl) and the atmo­spheric pressure (PB) (see Table 1.1).
■
Forces opposing airflow in the airways result from elastic, flow resistive, or inertial properties of the respiratory system. Collectively, they result in pressure drops across the respiratory system. Inertance deals with the mass of the lung and the acceleration of these tissues and the linear accel­eration of gas in the lung. Thus, pressure losses due to inertial forces in­crease progressively as respiratory frequency increases but are generally
Pressure Differences Across the
1.1
Airway (Paw) Palv – Pm Lung (PL) Palv – Ppl Chest wall (Pcw) Ppl – PB Total respiratory system (PRS) Palv – PB
Paw: airway pressure; Palv: pressure in alveolar spaces; PB: atmospheric pressure; Pcw: pressure of the chest wall; PL: lung pressure; Ppl: intrapleural pressure (estimated at esophageal pressure); Pm: mouth pressure (or airway opening); PRS: total pressure within the respiratory system.
Respiratory System
Chapter 1 Functional Anatomy of the Airway
negligible during quiet breathing. Elastance, and its reciprocal compli­ance, reflect the relationship between pressure and volume when there is no airflow. Hence, these measures are static. By contrast, resistance is dependent on the rate of changes of lung volume (i.e., flow) during active breathing and are, thus, dynamic pressures.

Comparative Anatomy of the Adult and Infant Airways

The anatomical differences between the adult and infant airways include the position and shape of the larynx, tongue, epiglottis, and bronchi (see Figure 1.5). In proportion to the rest of the body, the infant’s head is much larger than the adult’s, so its weight forces the cervical spine to assume a more flexed position, which easily produces airway obstruction. The infant’s tongue is proportion­ately larger than that of the adult’s and with lack of muscle tone may “fall back,” obstructing the flow of air during inspiration and expiration. Furthermore, the epiglottis is omega shaped, longer, and stiffer.
13
1.5
Comparative anatomy of adult and infant airways.
Tracheostomies
14
infants. At birth, the rima glottidis lies at the level of the interspace between the third and fourth cervical vertebrae. Upon reaching adulthood, it lies one verte­bra lower. The narrowest part of the infant’s laryngeal airway is at the level of the cricoid cartilage, whereas that of the adult is at the rima glottidis. At age 8, the larynx of the child closely resembles that of the adult except in size. The in­fant’s vocal cords are concave and lie more horizontally. The biggest difference between the adult and infant larynx is that the overall diameter of the adult’s airway is 10 to 12 mm wider than that of the newborn. If the internal diameter of a neonate’s larynx is 4 mm at the level of the cricoid cartilage, a 1-mm cir­cumferential reduction in this diameter (caused by either trauma or infection) would reduce the overall cross-sectional area of the airway by approximately 75%. A similar reduction in the diameter of the adult airway would reduce the cross-sectional area by about 44%.
leaving less room for error in positioning endotracheal tubes. The trachea of a premature infant may be as short as 2 cm. In infants, the bifurcation of the trachea (into right and left mainstem bronchi) projects at an angle of about 30 degrees from tracheal axis, whereas the angle of the left mainstem bronchus and tracheal axis is more acute. Thus, in infants the right mainstem bronchus is less vertical than in adults (Morris, 1988).
The larynx is situated at a higher level in relation to the cervical spine in
The major conducting airways are both narrower and shorter in infants,

Conclusion

Functional anatomy is important to understand when treating the patient with a tracheostomy tube. Paying attention to the nuances of anatomy in relation to technique will often mean the difference between success and failure in tracheostomy tube placement as well as removal and the host of day-to-day functions (respiratory, swallowing, and vocalization) in between. A clear un­derstanding of the relevant anatomical structures, their blood supply, and their innervation will enhance understanding of this interdependent relationship. A study of the airway’s functional anatomy will also guide the best approaches for instrumentation and intervention with each patient. It also provides a basis for understanding how complications are best avoided or, if they occur, how they may be detected.

Key Points

The upper airway provides a natural conduit for gas exchange, it humidi- ■ fies and protects the lower airway and participates in the functions of deglutition and phonation.
■
Alteration of pharyngeal anatomy may lead to the development of ob­structive sleep apnea (OSA) and upper airway obstruction.
■
The larynx is the organ of phonation. Disruption of its highly innervated structure immediately interferes with upper airway patency and, thus, impedes respiration.
Chapter 1 Functional Anatomy of the Airway
Deglutition and phonation are highly coordinated processes between ■ several structures of the upper airway and gastrointestinal tracts, and are dependent on intact sensory and motor innervation.
■
Pediatric airway anatomy varies from that of adult anatomy in the size of the head, the position of the larynx, the shape of the epiglottis, the angle of the mainstem bronchi, and, most importantly, the diameter of the upper airway.
References
Ayappa, I., & Rapoport, D. M. (2003). The upper airway in sleep: Physiology of the pharynx.
Sleep Medicine Review, 7, 9. Ellis, H., & Feldman, S. (1993). Anatomy for anaesthetists (6th ed.). Oxford, England: Blackwell
Scientific. Grande, C. M., Ramanathan, S., & Turndorf, H. (1988). The structural correlates of airway func-
tion. Problems in Anesthesia, 2, 175–182. Haponik, E. F., Smith, P. L., Bohlman, M. E., Allen, R. P., Goldman, S. M., & Bleecker, E. R.
(1983). Computerized tomography in obstructive sleep apnea: Correlation of airway size
with physiology during sleep and wakefulness. American Review of Respiratory Diseases,
127, 221. Morris, I. R. (1988). Functional anatomy of the airway. Emergency Medicine Clinics of North
America, 6, 639–669. Redden, R. J. (2000). Anatomic considerations in anesthesia. In C. A. Hagberg (Ed.), Handbook
of difficult airway management (pp. 1–13). Philadelphia, PA: Churchill Livingstone. Schwab, R. J., Gefner, W. B., Pack, A. L., & Hoffman, E. A. (1993). Dynamic imaging of the upper
airway in normal subjects. Journal of Applied Physiology, 74(4), 1504. Shorten, G. D., Opie, N. J., Graziotti, P., Morris, I., & Khangure, M. (1994). Assessment of upper
airway anatomy in awake, sedated, and anaesthetized patients using magnetic resonance
imaging. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, 22, 165.
15
This page intentionally left blank
Tracheotomy Procedure
Michiel J. Bové and M. Sherif Afi fi
2
Despite being one of the more common surgical procedures, tracheotomy can be one of the most challenging because of the medical complexities presented by many patients requiring it. Anatomical limitations make the trachea difficult to assess in certain patients, and emergent situations and nonoperative settings provide less than ideal circumstances.
Tracheotomy was first described nearly 3,500 years ago, making it one of the earliest recorded surgical procedures. Alexander the Great was alleged to have carried out a tracheotomy in the fourth century .. (Frost, 1976). The first successful tracheotomy is attributed to Antonio Musa Brasavola, who published his account of the procedure in 1546 .. The initial indications for the proce­dure were limited to life-threatening airway obstruction, and associated rates of mortality were therefore extremely high. The eventual expansion of its indica­tions as well as the standardization of its methods produced wider acceptance of the procedure. Chevalier Jackson’s description of his modifications to the procedure, published in 1909, improved its efficiency and safety and reduced the mortality of tracheotomy from 25% to less than 2%. This improved proce­dure also reduced the incidence of tracheal stenosis, particularly in children.
17
Tracheostomies
18
Jackson’s systematic analysis led him to recognize the importance of several factors, including avoiding too high an incision or dividing the cricoid cartilage, using an appropriate cannula, and providing appropriate postoperative care.

Indications for Tracheotomy

The indications for tracheotomy placement in the adult population can be grouped into four broad categories: A tracheotomy can be performed to relieve a mechanical obstruction, manage aspiration and promote bronchial hygiene maneuvers, provide long-term ventilation (while avoiding the long-term com­plications of translaryngeal intubation), and promote weaning from mechani­cal ventilator support. The indications for tracheotomy were recently defined by the American Academy of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery in the Clinical Indicators Compendium (2009) seen in Table 2.1.
sideration of multiple factors is necessary to ensure optimal patient outcome. Relevant factors include the relative risk of tracheotomy versus alternative means of providing an artificial airway, characteristics of the patient’s respira­tory anatomy and physiology, the patient’s specific pathologic process and prog­nosis, available institutional facilities, and skilled personnel.
endotracheal intubation while other prioritized supportive care is provided. An­gioneurotic edema, temporary bilateral vocal cord paralysis, and epi glottitis are examples of acute airway obstruction in which temporary orotracheal intuba­tion usually obviates the need for a surgical airway. Alternatively, if planned interventions such as radiation therapy or surgery predict airway obstruction, a tracheotomy can be performed prior to treatment to protect the airway. Tra­cheotomy is also frequently performed as part of head and neck surgical proce­dures involving free tissue transfer reconstruction in the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypo pharynx, or larynx. In these cases, postsurgical edema may be deleterious
The decision to perform a tracheotomy remains complex; however, a con-
Whenever possible, acute upper airway obstruction should be managed with
Indications for Tracheotomy as Defined by the
American Academy of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery in the Clinical Indicators
2.1
1. Prolonged or expected prolonged intubation
2. Inability of patient to manage secretions
3. Facilitation of ventilation support
4. Inability to intubate
5. Adjunct to manage head and neck surgery
6. Adjunct to manage significant head and neck trauma
Compendium
Chapter 2 Tracheotomy Procedure
to the viability of the newly placed flap and may lead to obstruction and reintu­bation because of altered anatomy.
Tracheotomy may be necessary in cases of laryngotracheal trauma, facial trauma, obstructing upper aero-digestive tract neoplasm, or even severe an­gioneurotic edema, in which intubation may not be technically feasible. Rarely, tra cheotomy is used in severe cases of obstructive sleep apnea where medi­cal treatments have failed and other forms of surgical correction are not ap propriate.

Timing of Tracheotomy

The decision about the most appropriate time to perform a tracheotomy should balance the likelihood of laryngeal injury due to the continued use of an endo­tracheal tube versus the likelihood of surgical or stoma-related complications following tracheotomy (see Table 2.2) (Stone & Bogdonoff, 1992).
There is no convincing evidence that endotracheal intubation should be limited to a specific time frame to prevent laryngeal dysfunction. However, many clinicians believe only patients who are unstable or unlikely to benefit from tracheotomy should be ventilated via an endotracheal tube for more than 21 days (Heffner, 1993; Plummer & Gracey, 1989). Part of the rationale is that tracheotomy improves patient comfort and communication and enhances nurs­ing care (Bishop, 1989). A multicenter international study of 1,638 patients found that tracheotomy was performed after a median of 11 days, suggesting this view is widespread (Esteban et al., 2000).
19
Comparison of Tracheotomy and
2.2
Tracheotomy Endotracheal Intubation
Reduced need for sedation ■ Reduced damage to glottis ■ Reduced work of breathing ■ (by reducing dead space) Reduced patient discomfort
■
More invasive and complicated compared ■ with endotracheal tube placement Scar formation
■
Tracheotomy site can bleed or become ■ infected Requires skill to perform the procedure
■
May be associated with long-term ■ complications (e.g., swallowing difficulties)
Endotracheal Intubation
Easier and quicker to perform com- ■ pared with tracheotomy Tolerated well for short periods
■
Weaning more difficult after long- ■ term placement Requires sedation
■
Prevents aspiration of secretions ■ Can be used to give certain medica- ■ tions (e.g., adrenalin) Need to warm and filter gases as the
■
nose, which would normally provide this function, is bypassed Improper placement can occur (e.g.,
■
esophageal placement)
Tracheostomies
20
domized trial, Rumbak and co-investigators (2004) compared early tracheotomy (within 48 hours) to late tracheotomy (14 to 16 days) in 122 medical patients with respiratory failure who were expected to require mechanical ventilation for more than 14 days. They found the early group had significantly decreased mor­tality (31.7% versus 61.7%), incidence of hospital-acquired pneumonia (5% versus 25%), length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay (4.8 versus 16.2 days), and duration of mechanical ventilation (7.6 versus 17.4 days). In a meta-analysis of five stud­ies (406 patients), Griffiths, Barber, Morgan, and Young (2005) found that early tracheotomy (within 7 days) was associated with a shorter duration of mechani­cal ventilation as well as a shorter length of ICU stay. In a retrospective cohort study of more than 10,000 tracheotomy patients, Scales, Thiruchelvam, Kiss, and Redelmeier (2008) compared those who underwent early tracheotomy (within 10 days) with those who underwent late tracheotomy (after 10 days). The early tracheotomy group had more ventilator-free days and a significant reduction in 90-day mortality (34.8% versus 36.9%), 1-year mortality (46.5% versus 49.8%), and study mortality (63.9% versus 67.2%). Better outcomes were associated with early tracheotomy in all of the diagnostic subgroups except for patients with a history of cardiac disease, in whom early tracheotomy was associated with an increased risk of death at 90 days (relative risk 0.135, 95% CI 0.003–0.285).
study of 54 male veterans found that laryngeal pathology was significantly worse among patients who had undergone a tracheotomy 24 hours previously com­pared to patients who were extubated without a tracheotomy (Colice, Stukel, & Dain, 1989). There was no association between severe laryngeal complications and duration of endotracheal intubation in this study.
tients requiring prolonged intubation were randomized to early tracheotomy (within 4 days) versus prolonged intubation. There were no significant differ­ences in any clinical outcome, including mortality, incidence of pneumonia ac­quired in the ICU, number of ventilator-free days, time in ICU, number of septic episodes, sedation requirement, and laryngeal or tracheal complications. The trial was underpowered, however, since it was terminated early due to poor recruitment.
mechanical ventilation) appears appropriate for patients for whom weaning and extubation are not likely before day 14, provided the patient is stable. For those patients for whom early tracheotomy is not chosen, a daily evaluation of the probability that mechanical ventilator support will be needed beyond 21 days should determine the timing of tracheotomy as long as the patient is stable and benefits are anticipated.
Early tracheotomy has been supported by a number of studies. In a ran-
Other studies argue against early tracheotomy, however. One observational
In a prospective, randomized study by Blot and coauthors (2008), 123 pa-
Taking these data together, early tracheotomy (i.e., within 7 to 10 days of

Preoperative Management

The patient with an unstable airway represents the most acute of medical emer­gencies. Proper management requires the coordinated mobilization of a well­trained team of physicians, nurses, and respiratory care practitioners. Initial intervention, if feasible, should be via orotracheal intubation or rigid bronchos­copy. If these modalities are contraindicated or not possible, tracheotomy should
Chapter 2 Tracheotomy Procedure
be performed in the operating room where resources are readily available. In elective situations, however—for the stable, intubated patient—open bedside tracheotomy is performed more frequently in the ICU setting. Bedside trache­otomy has the advantages of decreased transport-related risks, operating room cost, and schedule burden. Regardless of the setting, adequate lighting (espe­cially headlights), suction, and assistance should be available. If possible, the anesthesia team should be present during tracheotomy for intensive cardiovas­cular and respiratory monitoring, to assist with mechanical ventilation, and to provide any necessary cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Frequently, patients with chronic respiratory obstruction develop elevated carbon dioxide levels, leading to loss of respiratory drive after the establishment of a surgical airway. Pre­operative laboratory profiles, including coagulation, hemoglobin, and electro­lytes, should be reviewed. Any abnormalities should be corrected and remain stable prior to elective tracheotomy.
The patient should be optimally positioned and secured. The neck should be extended (unless contraindicated) with a shoulder roll. For tracheotomies performed in an emergency on patients in respiratory distress, optimal neck extension is usually not tolerated, and the procedure is performed with the pa­tient in the semi-Fowlers position. The patient’s face, neck, chest, and shoul­ders should be sterilized with prep solution. The patient’s face should not be draped—both to allow easy access to the endotracheal tube as well as to avoid the collection of flammable, oxygen-enriched vapors beneath the drapes. Fur­ther, the use of alcohol-based antiseptics calls for strict adherence to the proper use of these substances, including observing the required drying time. It is also recommended that whenever electrocautery or diathermy is used on the skin, one of many aqueous-based antiseptics be used. If an alcohol-based antiseptic is used, it should be cleaned off with a dry swab before the diathermy is used.
21

Anesthesia Management

Typically, patients presenting for tracheostomy are either intubated patients in chronic respiratory failure, those suffering major trauma, or patients for whom tracheostomy is part of a scheduled procedure (e.g., radical neck dissection). Features of the history and physical exam that may be associated with a difficult airway include: (a) specific anatomic characteristics (e.g., bull neck, large tongue, receding jaw, limited mouth opening, difficulty visualizing posterior pharynx, diminished cervical spine range of motion, and obesity); (b) either inspiratory stridor (signifying obstruction at or above the level of the larynx) or expira­tory stridor (signifying subglottic or intrathoracic obstruction); (c) hoarseness (vocal cord lesion or dysfunction); (d) tachypnea; (e) marked respiratory effort; (f ) dyspnea; (g) a previous history of thyroid gland or neck surgery, trauma, or radiation therapy; (h) a history of previous difficult intubation or vocal cord paralysis; and (i) infections such as epiglottitis or Ludwig’s angina (Nekhendzy, Guta, & Champeau, 2009).
Preoperative Evaluation
Patients with respiratory insufficiency may require mechanical ventilation with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) to maintain adequate oxygenation.