Добавил:
ivanov666
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Aircraft Maintenance. Учебное пособие
.pdf
UNIT 2. FUEL
Approach Altitude will requ ire careful and thoughtful handling of power, acce leration and clean up to avoid an altitude bust.
Go-Around from above Decision Altitude
In training, most Go-Arounds are commenced at or near Decision Altitude.
A G/A flown due to bad wx has usually been anticipated & briefed. It is the G/A
flown in ‘good’ wx (perhaps due to ATC) or the G/A is comme nced from a point
other than DA, which usually presents the greatest problems. Pilots should be
mentally prepared to be told to Go-Around from any point on the Approach,
even from above the Go-Around Altitude. Practice in flying a Go-Around is
normally included in routine refresher training and analysis of Flight Data Monitoring data indicates a need for practice in flying Go -Arounds flown from above
DA/H as well as the more commonly practiced Go-Around from DA/H.
Transition to Instrument Flying
If the Go-Around is conducted because of weather conditions, t he transition to instruments will require particular attention. The Go-Around procedure
may be further complicated if airspeed and/or thrust setting are low. See the separate article "Go-Around - Transition to Instrument Flying". Many airlines use a
procedure (particularly in poor weathe r conditions) where the non-landing pi lot
will fly the approach down to Decision Altitude with the specific intention of going around at Decision Altitude unless they have a clear call of the decision to
continue the approach and take control from the Landing Pilot. This can make
both acquisition of the required visual reference easier and obviate the necessity
of the pilot flying the Go -Around fro m making th e trans ition from inst rument s to
visual and then back to instruments if a Go-Around is flown.
All Engines Go-around
Many modern aircraft have an automatic facility whereby the aircraft automatic systems accomplish the transition from app roach to Go-Around by power and attitude adjustment. However, not all aircraft have this facility; moreover,
there is a need for pilots of aircraft which do have automatic Go-Around capability to maintain proficiency in this procedure in case manually reversion should
be necessary.
An All Engines Go Around will typically be executed when the aircraft is
relatively light, at least below Maximum Landing Weight, and so when Go
Around thrust is applied performance may well be brisk - if you are not careful,
not only will you climb with a very high v/s, you will accelerate rapidl y through
all the flap limiting speeds. One major manufacturer limits the rate of climb to
41

AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE
2,000 feet per minute because of this (Even so, this assumes that pitch & speed
are correct; if pitch is low, thrust will increase up to full GA thrust and the a/c
will rapidly accelerate, but a ROC of 2000fpm will not be achieved.). Aircraft
SOPs must take precedence but it is worth reme mbering that the aircraft will be
much more manageable when reducing to Climb Thrust (but will still accelerate
faster than on a normal take-off due to reduced weight). Furthermore, careful
consideration needs to be given to how this can be handled as, if Go Around
Thrust (TOGA) is never selected, the FMS Flight Plan and electronic checklist
(ECL) may not sequence as expected or correctly.
PF must be ready for any pitch up effect that is much mo re mark ed with
all engines operating than on the Engine Out Go-Arounds practised in the simulator. FBW a/c may automatically t rim out any pitch/power couple, so it is necessary for the PF to make a positive rotation manoeuvre (pull-up) to place the a/c
in the correct G/A attitude. In all cases, pilots should recognise (and resist) the
pitch-up illusion created by rapid acceleration.
The most important element of handling a Manual Go-Around is selecting
the correct power and pitch attitude to enable the Go-Around to be flown at the
correct speed. Knowing the appropriate figures will help in flying an accurate
profile. Because of the high power settings invo lved in a Go-Around it is inte resting to see how often when the speed starts to run away how many pilots, at
this time of very high workload, intuitively try to control the speed by reducing
power rather than with pitch attitud e . This often reduces power to a level that can
seriously degrade climb performance causing potential Obstacle Clearance problems.
Go-Around from Non-standard Speed or Configuration
The regulator mandates that crews demonstrate, in the simulator, competence at go–round from Decision Minima, when the aircraft is close to Vref an d
has drag flap deployed. This is fine but in real life many go -rounds are flown
much earlier in the approach, prior to full flap selection and potentially close to
flap limit speed to maintain separation from the following aircraft. These are
rarely practiced in the sim – there is barely enough time to do the mandated
items, never mind gain some handling experience - and invariably they lead to
speed limits being exceeded or level busts. Crews should give some thought to
how they would manage a Go-Around at all stages of an app roach, including the
following:
42

UNIT 2. FUEL
It may be appropriate to consider continuing down the approach path , if
legally permitted, for a few moments whilst the handling of the Go-Around and
the configuration is discussed before being actioned.
Going around from above the missed approach altitude may require the pilot to
level off and maintain their curren t altitude or a modified altitude as instructed
by ATC.
In congested airspace the missed approach altitude, track and speed is usually
mandated. This can be a complicated affair if the Go-Around instruction or decision is made above the mandated missed approach altitude.
To ensure correct sequencing and compliance with the Go-Around procedure in FMS equipped aircraft it is often advisable (if conditions allow) to co ntinue on the approach until the aircraft descends below the missed approach altitude before selecting TOGA.
Relying on LNAV for the lateral pa rt of the Go -round gu idance can create
a significant problem if the FMS flight plan legs have not sequenced correctly
prior to initiating the G/A, then the lateral path of the G/A is likely to flown i ncorrectly.
Task Sharing
Regarding task-sharing during a a manual go-around, the FSF ALAR
Briefing Note 6.2 "Manual Go-Around" recommends that:
"The pilot flying (PF) is responsible for controlling vertical navigation and
lateral navigation, and for energy management, by ... Flying manually, with
flight director (FD) guidance and an adapted (e.g., horizontal situation indicator
(HSI) - type) navigation display (ND) mode.
"If manual thrust is selected, the pilot monitoring (PM) should monitor
closely the airspeed, airspeed trend and thrust, and call any ex cessive deviation
(e.g., airspeed decreasing below VREF).
"The PNF is responsible for monitoring tasks and for conducting actions
requested by the PF, including:
Conducting the standard PM tasks;
Monitoring the thrust setting;
Monitoring vertical speed and radio-altimeter altitude; and,
Monitoring pitch attitude, bank angle, airspeed and airspeed trend, and calling
out any excessive deviation."
The briefing note then provides a thorough explanation of the flight dynamics of a go-around, which is important for understanding the interaction between changes to engine power and flight control settings.
43

AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE
If a Go-Around is flown using F/D crews should be aware of exactly what
is being commanded in roll and pitch. For example some F/D will command a
heading that maintains aircraft track as at the moment Go Around was initiat ed
(which, particularly if correcting localiser deviation at the time, may be very different from the required track during the Go Around manoeuvre). Adherence to
SOPs will help ensure that appropriate modes are selected to command appropriate track and vertical profiles. Particularly after a Non Precision Approach in
poor weather, the landing pilot can experience very high workload in tryi ng to
manoeuvre the aircraft for landing. The PM plays a vital role in monitoring this
phase of the approach and calling for a Go-Around if stabilised approach criteria
are not met or if unhappy with the manoeuvre. A good briefing can be very helpful in setting expectations/ bott om lines to inform these decisions.
There is often strong emphasis on flying a go-roun d manually. Nonetheless, the maximum use of the autopilot will reduce pilot workload, aid monitoring capacity and go a long way to ensuring a successful outcome to any Go Around.
Flying a Manual Go-Around
This is a very demanding manoeuvre and in real life is often accompanied
by extra stress due to the bad weather or traffic problems that caused it. Crews
should take any opportunity in the simulator to practice it with all engines operating as well as mandated engine-failed training.
"For a safe go-around," the FSF briefing note continues, "the following
“three Ps” constitute a golden rule:
Pitch: set and maintain the pitch-attitude target
Power: set and check the go-around thrust; and,
Performance: check aircraft performance: positive rate of climb, airspeed at or
above Vref (reference landing speed), speed brakes retracted, radio-altimeter indications and barometric-altimeter indications increasing, wings level, gear up,
flaps as required.
Safety Culture
Go-rounds should never be met with any kind of negative feedback. Previous accidents have revealed pilots being reluctant to Go-round because they had
been criticised for doing so earlier. In a large fleet, there will always be some p ilots who have done more Go-rounds than others, as explained by the ‘Law of
Large Numbers’ (which shows that some lottery numbers occur more than 4
times as often as others and, when plotted, fit under a normal distribution curve.
44

UNIT 3. FIRE PROTECTION. ICE AND RAIN PROTECTION
Text A. LOWER CARGO SMOKE DETECTION
AND SUPPRESSION SYSTEM
Vocabulary
Advisory condition – режим оповещения
Alert signal – сигнал предупреждения
Ambient type detectors – датчик, измеряющий непосредственное состояние
окружающей среды
Aural and visual annunciation – звуковое и визуальное оповещение
Aural fire warning bell – звуковой сигнализатор о пожаре
Aural warn devices box – коробка звуковых сигнализаторов
Detector enclos ure – место установки датчика
Detector fault panel – панель неисправностей датчиков
Dual loop (2 loop) system – двухконтурная система
Engine and APU fire control modul e – модуль управления пожаротушением
двигателей
и ВСУ
Fire detection and suppression control panel щиток управления системой по-
жарообнаружения и пожаротушения
Flight crew – экипаж
Forward/Aft cargo compartment – передний/задний грузовой отсек
LED fault indicator – светодиодный индикатор неисправности
Lower cargo compartment – нижний грузовой отсек
Master Caution – основной предупреждающий сигнал
Normal operation mode – штатный режим
Self contained detector – автономный датчик
Six Pack annunciator – оповещатель с шестью элементами
Smoke DETECTORS – датчики задымления
Test switch – кнопка управления
Triple redundant system – система с трехкратным резервированием
Warning condition – режим предупреждения
The Lower Cargo Compartment Detection System is designed to detect and provide aural and visual annunciation to the flight crew of a smoke and / or fire
condition in either the Forward or Aft Cargo Compartment.
The system is a dual loop, triple redundant design comprised of:
x one Control Panel;
45

AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE
x one Detector Fault Panel;
x ten Smoke Detectors.
Control Panel
The control panel is instal led on the P8 center aisle stand in the cockpit, just aft
of the existing Engine and APU Fire Control Module. The control panel is divided into two sections for the Forward and Aft Cargo Compartments. Each cargo
compartment section is divided into 2 loops (A and B).
Smoke Detectors
The Forward Cargo Compartment is equipped with four detectors, operating in 2
loops (A and B). The Aft Cargo Compartment is equipped with six detectors,
opertating in 2 loops (A and B).
Detector Fault Panel
The Detector Fault Panel is located in the E & E Compartment, on the E1-3
shelf. It contains a test switch and an LED fault indicator fo r each smoke detector.
Aural Warn Devices Box
The Aural Warn Devices Box contains the Fire Warning Bell.
Smoke Detectors
The smoke detectors are self contained, microprocessor controlled, continuously
monitored, ambient type detectors. They require no forced airflow over the sensing element. The Forward Cargo Compartment is equipped with four detectors,
46

UNIT 3. FIRE PROTECTION. ICE AND RAIN PROTECTION
operating in 2 loops. The four detectors are installed in two enclosures. Each enclosure contains an A loop and B loop detector.
Each detector operates independently of the others and provides the control panel
with signals for smoke condition and fault status. In addition, because each detector is independent of the others, they can be replaced individually. Each enclosure assembly features guard bars to protect the detectors from cargo and
baggage.
Cargo Smoke Detection System Operation
In normal operating mode, the Smoke Detection System is completely transparent to the flight crew. The control panel is divided into two sections for the Forward and Aft Cargo Compartments. Each cargo compartment section is monitored independently of each other, and is divided into 2 loops (A and B).
An advisory is initiated if one or more detectors of one loop in the same cargo
compartment (forward or aft) sends an alert signal to the control panel.
As long as an advisory con dition exists, all visual annun ciations on the control
panel will remain illuminated. When advisory condition is no longer present, all
47

AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE
annunciations will extinguish, and the system will automatically reset itself to
normal mode of operation.
A warning is initiated if any two detectors, one from each loop of the same cargo
compartment, sends an alert signal to the control panel.
A warning condition will result in the following:
_ The DET LEDs representing the alarming detect or loop(s) will illumi-
nate on the control panel.
_ The red FIRE light on the control panel will illuminate.
_ The Master Caution lights will illuminate.
_ The OVHT/DET Six Pack annunciator will illuminate.
_ The Fire Warn lights will illuminate on the glareshield.
_ The aural fire warning bell will sound.
Lower Cargo Fire Suppression System
The Cargo Compartment Fire Suppression System features Halon 1301. Its suppression ability is based on the theory of breaking the chain of reaction for a fire,
by preventing the fuel source(s) and oxygen from combining in the presence of
heat.
The system operates in conjunction with the Cargo Compartment Smoke Dete ction System.
The system is capable of suppressing a fire in either the Forward or Aft Cargo
Compartment for at least 60 minutes from initial activation.
NOTE: Although in some instances it may extinguish a fire, it is im-
portant to note the system design is only intended to suppress the spread of fire
long enough to allow the aircraft to safely land and evacuate.
48

UNIT 3. FIRE PROTECTION. ICE AND RAIN PROTECTION
Exercise 1. Decide if the following sentences are true or false. Correct the
false ones.
1. The smoke detection system automatically activates the fire extinguishing
system.
2. The smoke detectors need no forced airflow around them to sense smoke.
3. There is a single control panel the forward and aft cargo compartments.
4. The fire suppression system is capable of suppressing fire for at least 1
hour.
5. After activating the fire suppression system it is safe to continue with the
planned flight.
6. An advisory mode is initiated if at least two detectors send an alert signal
to the control panel.
7. All the four detectors in the forward cargo compartment must be replaced
if one of them is faulty.
8. There is a LED fault indicator for each of the smoke detectors.
9. The fire warning bell provides an aural annunciation to the flight crew.
10. The flight crew do not need to reset the smoke detection system manually
after an advisory condition.
Exercise 2. Here are some common aircraft components in the incorrect order. Put them in the correct order and translate them into Russian. Find the
word-groups in the text and translate the sentences.
Look at the example:
column captain control → captain control column
1. lights master caution
2. devices warn aural box
3. aft compartment cargo
4. design triple redundant
5. system fire cargo suppression compartment
6. operation of normal mode
7. control fire module APU
8. panel detector fault
9. warn lights fire
10. fault LED indicator
11. detectors type ambient
12. compartment detection lower cargo system
49

AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE
aft
provide with
обеспечивать
caution
without interruption
неисправность
compartment
mistake, error
основной
continuously
main
оборудовать
fault
section
предупреждение
master
back
обнаруживать
detect
ensure
отсек
provide
warning
непрерывно
equip
sense
задний
Exercise 3. Match the words in the left column with their synonyms in the
middle and translations in the right. Find them in the text. Translate the
sentences in which they are used into Russian.
Text B. ICE AND RAIN PROTECTION
Vocabulary
Alpha vane – флюгерный датчик угла атаки
Bird strike – столкновение самолета с птицами
Birdproofing – защита при столкновении с птицами
Cabin window anti-icing system – система антиобледенения иллюминаторов
кабины
Clear vision – хороший обзор
Container receptacle – ниша для контейнера
Drive motor and torqu e convert er assembly – узел привода и преобразователя
вращающего момента
Impact strength – ударопрочность
Overheat condition – режим превышения допустимой температуры
Park position – нерабочий
режим
Pressure gage – манометр
Printed circuit card – печатная плата
Probe heat system – система обогрева датчиков
Rain repellent fluid – водоотталкивающая жидкость
Reapplication – зд. повторное распыление
Resistor box – блок резисторов
Sensing accuracy – точность замера датчиком
Sliding window – форточка
50
Соседние файлы в предмете [НЕСОРТИРОВАННОЕ]
