Добавил:
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Culturology. Educational manual

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
06.09.2026
Размер:
2 Мб
Скачать
31
Cultural relativism
As usual ordinary worldview of a person has ethnocentrical character. It means that a person judges someone else's foreign culture through the values and beliefs of her own ones. From this standpoint, a person might frame other cultures as weird, exotic, intriguing, and even as problems to be solved. In contrast, it is necessary to recognize the rights of all cultures of the world their own beliefs, values, and practices that have developed in particular historical, political, social, material, and ecological contexts and that it makes sense that they would differ from someone`s else culture. None are necessarily right or wrong, or good or bad. This concept is called the concept of cultural relativism.
While some societies have clear-cut gender and racial divisions, for instance, others do not seem to exhibit a similar metaphysics. Cultural relativists hold that no culture has a truer worldview than any other; they are simply different views.
Examples: Cultural relativism explains, for example, what constitutes breakfast varies widely from place to place. A typical breakfast in Turkey are fish soup or stewed vegetables might seem strange for breakfast in Russia or some other places, this is perfectly normal. Or a tendency in USA toward sugary cereals and milk or preference for egg sandwiches loaded with bacon and cheese would seem quite bizarre to other cultures too. But for USA it is a traditional breakfast. For Russia traditional breakfast is porridge or scrambled eggs.
Why does Recognizing Cultural Relativism Matter?
By acknowledging cultural relativism, we can recognize that our culture shapes what we consider to be beautiful, ugly, appealing, disgusting, virtuous, funny, and abhorrent. It shapes what we consider to be good and bad art, music, and film, as well as what we consider to be tasteful or tacky consumer goods.
Question: how do you think, if relativism is possible in nature? Argue you position.
Task: fill in the table (table 2) with some differences between the features of your culture and any other one. Chose any features you want for the comparison. Write an explanation of the differences. To find an explanation use the Internet. Table 1 is an example for you.
32
Table 1
Features
Russian culture
Tajik culture
An explanation of the difference
National cuisine
Russians eat pork
Tajiks don`t eat pork
Tajiks are Muslims. Pork in Islam is forbidden
Attitude towards old men
For modern youth they are not authoritative persons
For modern youth they are authoritative persons, especially in villages
Russian culture develops quicklier then Tajik one, so the life experience of old people still makes sense for youth
Position during eating
Russian sit at the table on chairs or sofa
Modern Tajik use chairs too, but more traditional Tajiks sit on the floor
Tajiks find out about tables and chairs only in the beginning of the XX century, but this furniture was not popular among them for a very long time. Russians have been using this furniture for centuries
Table 2
Features
__________
your culture
____________
write any other culture
you know about
An explanation
of the difference
1.
2.
3.
Multiculturalism and cosmopolitism
The idea of culture, most notably in connection with the phenomenon of globalization, has given rise to the concept of multiculturalism. From the middle of the XX century till nowadays we can see mass migration of people and spread of various cultural phenomena to wide range of different cultures.
Multiculturalism is a position according to which different cultures and cultural groups within particular cultures have to be recognized and given political rights and social guarantees. Multiculturalists say, that religion, language, traditions and so on of different peoples have equal value, should be respected equally. Language and religion are very important for peoples to keep their ethnic identity.
In one way or another, a large part of the contemporary world population lives in more than one culture, be it because of the exchange of culinary techniques, holidays, musical or literary knowledge, or fashion ideas, and so on. There is a
33
cosmopolitan view of culture within the multicultural concept. In modern world meaningful options come to individuals from a variety of cultural sources. For
example, the Bible, Roman mythology, and the Grimms’ fairy tales have all
influenced Russian culture and they all came to Russian culture from different cultures.
Question: is your country a multicultural one? Prove your answer with some examples.
Task: fill in the table. Write what was borrowed by your culture from other ones.
Your country
What was borrowed
From what country
Parallels between cultural and biological mechanisms
There are some common features between cultural and biological mechanisms identified. But they look very controversial.
Task: read the text and fill in the table after it.
Memes and Cultural Epidemiology
“It is a platitude that cultures change over time. Some research studies the
nature of these changes. Such changes are often described under the rubric of cultural evolution. As the term suggests, cultural change may resemble biological change in various respects. As with biological traits, we can think of culture as having trait-like units that arise and then spread to varying degrees. The study of cultural evolution explores the factors that can determine which cultural traits get passed on.
Some authors push the analogy between cultural evolution and biological evolution very far. Within biology, the most celebrated evolutionary process is natural selection: traits that increase fitness are more likely than others to get passed on from one generation to the next. 20th century evolutionary theory (“the modern
synthesis”) supplements this Darwinian idea with the principle that traits are
34
transmitted genetically. Genes produce traits (or phenotypes), which impact reproductive success, and thereby impact which genes will be copied into the next generation. Richard Dawkins (1976), who helped popularize this idea, suggests that cultural traits get reproduced in an analogous way. Dawkins characterizes cultural items as “memes” — a term that echoes “gene” while emphasizing the idea that culture is passed on mimetically that is, by imitation. Like a gene, a meme will spread if it is successful.
Some authors have resisted the analogy, arguing that there are crucial differences between generic and cultural transmission. In natural selection, genes ordinarily spread vertically from parents to children. Cultural items, in contrast, often spread laterally across peer groups, and can even spread from children to parents, as with the rise of email and other technological innovations. Cultural traits are also spread in a way that is mediated by intentions, rather than blindly. A teacher may intend to spread a trait, and a student may recognize that the trait has some value, and innovators may come up with new traits by intending to solve problems. Intentional creation is unlike random mutation because it can happen at a more rapid rate with immediate correction if the trait doesn't succeed. Success, too, is measured differently in the cultural case. Some cultural traits are passed on because they increase biological fitness, but traits that reduce reproduction rates, such as tools or war or contraception, can also spread, and many traits, such as music trends, spread without any impact on procreation or survival. Unlike genes, cultural traits are also copied imperfectly, sometimes changing slightly with each transmission. And there is no clear distinction within culture between a genotype and a phenotype; the trait that gets reproduced is often responsible for the reproducing. For example, if someone learns to ride a bicycle, there is no clear distinction between an inner mechanism and an outward manifestation; the skill is both the mechanism and its deployment.
All these contrasts suggest to some that the notion of a meme is misleading. Cultural traits are spread in ways that differ significantly from genes. In an effort to bypass the comparison to genes, Sperber (1996) offers an epidemiology analogy. Cultural items, which for him are representations, are spread like viruses. They can be spread laterally, and they can reduce fitness. Viral transmission depends on contagion, and, like viruses, some cultural traits are catchier than others. That is to say, some traits are easier to learn they are more psychologically compelling.
Boyer (2001) has applied this idea to the spread of religious beliefs. Tales of the supernatural build on existing knowledge but add variations that make them exciting, such as the idea of a person who can survive death and walk through walls.
35
Boyer shows experimentally that such exotic variations on ordinary categories are easy to remember and spread.
The epidemiology analogy may have limitations. For example, viruses do not usually spread with intentional mediation, and they are often harmful. But it has some advantages over the analogy to genetic transmission. Ultimately, such analogies give
way to actual models of how transmission works”
13
.
Task: fill in the table. Write in the first part of the table what is in common between memes and genes, according to Richard Dawkins (strong sides of the concept) and what is the difference between them (weak sides of the concept). Write in the second part of the table what is in common between transmission of viruses and cultural items, according to Sperber (strong sides of the concept) and what is the difference between them (weak sides of the concept).
Concept
Strong sides of the concept
Weak sides
of the concept
1. Memes and genes
2. Viral transmission
If animals have a culture?
Once Daniel Kelly and Andreas De Block asked a question if animals have their own culture?
13
Kelly D., Block De A. Culture and Cognitive Science // The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy / ed.
Edward N. Zalta. URL: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2022/entries/culture-cogsci.
36
Task for students:
Before reading the further text, assume the answer to the question. Substantiate your opinion.
The opinion of the scientists is the following:
If culture is defined in terms of practices or abilities that are shared within groups in virtue of the achievements of particular group members, then one can even say that apes have culture. Evidence for group-specific innovations, such as nut cracking techniques, have been found among chimpanzees and orangutans. Culture and cultural transmission have also been documented in dolphins.
This raises a question. If other creatures are capable of cultural transmission, why don't they show the extreme forms of cultural variation and accumulated cultural knowledge characteristic of our species? There are various possible answers. Great apes may also be less innovative than humans, and this may stem from their limited capacity to understand causal relations, or to plan for the distant future. Apes may also have limitations on memory that prevent them from building on prior innovations to create cultural products of ever-increasing complexity. In addition, apes have less highly developed skills for mental state attribution, and that may further reduce their capacity for imitative learning. Human infants do not just copy what adult models do; they copy what those models are trying to do. Warneken and Tomasello have shown that young chimps understand intended actions to some degree, but less robustly than their human counterparts. Finally, the human capacity to build on prior innovations and transmit cultural knowledge is often linguistically mediated, and apes and dolphins may have communication systems with far more limited expressive potential, making it impossible to move beyond simple copying and adopt the deferred form of imitation that we call instruction14.
Questions
1. What is the position of the scientists about “animal” culture?
2. What arguments do they give?
Literature and Internet sources
1. Winfried N. The topography of Yuri Lotman’s semiosphere // International
Journal of Cultural Studies. 2015. Vol. 18 (1). Р. 11–26.
14
Culture and Cognitive Science // Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: website. URL:
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/culture-cogsci/.
37
2. Brinkmann K. How Can Cultural Values Be Reformed? // Philosophy Now.
2019. April/May. P. 20.
3. Culture and Cognitive Science // Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy :
[website]. URL: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/culture-cogsci/.
4. How culture influences health beliefs // EuroMed Info : [website]. URL:
https://www.euromedinfo.eu/how-culture-influences-health-beliefs.html/.
5. Robinson A. Bakhtin: Dialogism, Polyphony and Heteroglossia // Ceaserfire.
2011. July 29. URL: https://ceasefiremagazine.co.uk/in-theory-bakhtin-1/.
1.3. ETHNIC AND NATIONAL CULTURES: RELATIONSHIP AND FEATURES
Content of the topic:
Ethnic culture and its features. National culture and its features. Comparison of ethnic and national cultures. Ethnic culture in our days. Ethnocultural stereotype and its types.
After the topic completion students should
1) know:
- notions of ethnic and national cultures;
- about relationship between these two kinds of culture;
- distinctive features of these two kinds of culture;
2) be able to:
- search and critically use the literature necessary for the explaining of the topic;
- evaluate cultural achievements through the historical context of their creation;
- use the knowledge gained in the course to assess the phenomena of the
cultural life of modern society;
- understand the role of cultural heritage in self-improvement and self-
development of the individual;
3) have:
- skills of studying and analyzing texts with cultural content;
- methods of discussion and polemics;
- skills of public speech and reasoned presentation of their own point of view.
Main notions
Ethnos is a cross-generation group (blood relationship is necessary) of people that is united by long collective living on the certain territory, by common language, culture and self-consciousness.
38
Ethnic culture is a culture of people connected by a common origin (blood relationship) and jointly carried out economic activities.
Nation is a historical community of people that appears as a result of the common territory, economic relations, language, ethnic features of culture.
National culture unites people living in large areas and not necessarily related by blood and family relations. It appears as a result of a new type of social communication associated with the invention of writing, with the birth of the literary language and national literature. Writing helps spread the ideas that are necessary for unite the nation. Thus, the national culture is built on the foundation of written culture, while the ethnic culture can be quite illiterate, for example, the culture of primitive tribes that still exist in our day.
Ethnocultural stereotype is a generalized idea of the typical features that characterize any ethnos.
Every ethnic culture has ancient roots. Their traditions were accumulated for centuries. They impact their representatives, ethnic and national identity. There are a
lot of definitions of terms “ethnos” and “nation”. Also, there is no any common
position according to the relationship between these terms in science world. Some scientists believe that it is possible to refuse the term “nation” and use only the term “ethnos”. Other scientists consider the terms are equal.
Ethnic culture
Ethnic culture is the most ancient layer of the national culture. It involves everyday life and traditions of ancestors. We can find it in folk cuisine, in closes, folklore, folk craft, folk medicine, etc. Its features depend on natural environment, because in the past nature used to influence on society more strongly than now. Every person belongs to an ethnos.
There isn`t the only one point of view on nature of ethnic identity. Some researchers believe that the identity depends on our genome and we cannot choose it ourselves. Other researchers believe that an ethnos is a social community. To be a member of the community a person has to consider himself a representative of an ethnic group and separate from other ethnic groups.
These both positions have common idea: there is no any person in the world that would genetically belong only to one ethnos. Almost everyone has his ancestors from different ethnic groups. We have to say that the only right way to understand the ethnic identity is to consider it as a bio-social community.
Some people consider their ethnos the most valuable and all other ethnic groups evaluate throw their cultural measure. This position is called ethnocentrism.
39
This is wrong position. We have to consider value of all the ethnic groups are equal. As you remember, we have already talked about it in the topic about cultural relativism.
National culture
There are two basic aspects in national culture socioeconomical one and political one. In national culture common traditions, believes and area are more important than biological relationship between people.
Development of a nation is influenced by urban growth, because it leads to the common economic and political relationships, improving of level of education, and in the same time mythological worldview is replaced by religious one and later by scientific. We can understand how a nation appears if we use a historical approach. We have to consider a nation during its process of historical development. What is in common between an old man and a child this old man was once? This common thing is a biography that this old man keeps in his memory. Every nation appears in the same way by its own history that is stored in its culture.
Every nation has their single semiotic field. This is a system of signs that is known for every representative of a nation, for example language, traditional forms of behavior, everyday symbolism, art symbolism, political symbolism and so on.
It is considered that there are both Russian ethnos and Russian nation. There are a lot of representatives of different ethnic groups on the territory of Russian Federation. Common for all of them is one nation Russian. For example, the grand-grandfather of famous poet Alexander Pushkin was Ethiopian, but Pushkin is considered Russian.
Famous Russian writer Nicolay Gogol was from Ukraine but is considered a Russian writer. Nicolay Berdiaev is a Russian philosopher but his mother was a Frenchwoman. We can see the same situation in other countries, for example American Japanese, American Indian, French Arab and so on (see scheme 1).
Scheme 1
40
But there is also other situation when representatives of one nation live in different countries. For example, we can find Slavic roots of Russians, Ukrainian, Belorussian, Poles, Bulgarians and other peoples of Eastern Europe (see scheme 2).
Scheme 2
National culture is founded on ethnic culture that is supplemented by national literature and art, science and philosophy. Despite the fact that the impact of ethnic culture on the contemporary life is very weak ethnic culture is still influencing national culture writers take images and narratives from ethnic myths and fairytales, compositors take rhythms and melodies from ethnic songs, architects take styles and ways of building decoration in an antient architecture.
Comparison of ethnic and national culture
Ethnic culture
National culture
1. Ethnic culture preserve archaic life traditions, which don`t meet the conditions of modern life. It keeps old rules
1. National culture valuates innovations, creativity and permanent changes
2. Ethnic culture is closed. It does not accept any unknown cultural phenomena
2. National culture accepts new achievements. More it is developed more it takes from other cultures its achievements
3. Ethnic culture try to keep difference in everyday life, in behavior, pronunciation and so on between different groups of population
3. In national culture such distinctions disappear
4. Ethnic culture emergences in village
4. National culture emergences in city
5. Ethnic culture is passed from generation to generation through everyday life
5. National culture is passed through the education and requires intellectual effort to assimilate it