Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_2823_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана
.pdf
2021-140045.
136. Berthold HK, Gouni-Berthold I, Bestehorn
KP, Böhm M, Krone W. Physician gender is
associated with the quality of type 2 diabetes
care. J Intern Med. 2008 Oct;264(4):340-350.
doi:10.1111/j.1365-2796.2008.01967.x.
137. Baumhäkel M, Müller U, Böhm M. Influence
of gender of physicians and patients on
guideline-recommended treatment of chronic
heart failure in a cross-sectional study. Eur J
Heart Fail. 2009 Mar;11(3):299-303.
doi:10.1093/eurjhf/hfn041.
138. Tsugawa Y, Jena AB, Figueroa JF, Orav EJ,
Blumenthal DM, Jha AK. Comparison of
hospital mortality and readmission rates for
Medicare patients treated by male vs female
physicians. JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Feb
1;177(2):206-213.
doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.7875.
139. Dayal A, O’Connor DM, Qadri U, Arora
VM. Comparison of male vs female resident
milestone evaluations by faculty during
emergency medicine residency training. JAMA
Intern Med. 2017 May 1;177(5):651-657.
doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.9616.
140. Rojek A, Khanna R, Yim JWL, et al.
Differences in narrative language in
evaluations of medical students by gender and
under-represented minority status. J Gen
Intern Med. 2019 May;34(5):684-691.
doi:10.1007/s11606-019-04889-9.
https://t.me/med1917
141. Ross DA, Boatright D, Nunez-Smith M,
Jordan A, Chekroud A, Moore EZ. Differences
in words used to describe racial and gender
groups in medical student performance
evaluations. PLoS One. 2017 Aug
9;12(8):e0181659.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0181659.
142. Gingerich A, van der Vleuten CP, Eva KW,
Regehr G. More consensus than idiosyncrasy:
categorizing social judgments to examine
variability in Mini-CEX ratings. Acad Med.
2014 Nov;89(11):1510-1519.
doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000000486.
143. Ten Cate O, Regehr G. The power of
subjectivity in the assessment of medical
trainees. Acad Med. 2019 Mar;94(3):333-337.
doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000002495.
144. Holmboe ES, Kogan JR. Will any road get
you there? Examining warranted and
unwarranted variation in medical education.
Acad Med. 2022 Aug 1;97(8):1128-1131.
doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000004667.
145. Asch DA, Nicholson S, Srinivas S, Herrin J,
Epstein AJ. Evaluating obstetrical residency
programs using patient outcomes. JAMA. 2009
Sep 23;302(12):1277-1283.
doi:10.1001/jama.2009.1356.
146. van der Vleuten CP, Schuwirth LW, Scheele
F, Driessen EW, Hodges B. The assessment of
professional competence: building blocks for
theory development. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet
https://t.me/med1917
Gynaecol. 2010 Dec;24(6):703-719.
doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2010.04.001.
147. Massie J, Ali JM. Workplace-based
assessment: a review of user perception and
strategies to address identified shortcomings.
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2016
May;21(2):455-473. doi:10.1007/s10459-015-
9614-0.
148. Lorwald A, Lahner FM, Mooser B, et al.
Influences of the implementation of mini-CEX
and DOPS for postgraduate medical trainees’
learning: a grounded theory study. Med Teach.
2019 Apr;41(4):448-456.
doi:10.1080/0142159X.2018.1497784.
149. Holmboe ES, Hawkins RE, Huot SJ. Effects
of training in direct observation of medical
residents’ clinical competence: a randomized
trial. Ann Intern Med. 2004 Jun 1;140(11):874-
881. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-140-11-200406010-
00008.
150. Cook DA, Dupras DM, Beckman TJ, Thomas
KG, Pankratz VS. Effect of rater training on
reliability and accuracy of mini-CEX scores: a
randomized, controlled trial. J Gen Intern Med.
2009 Jan;24(1):74-79. doi:10.1007/s11606-008-
0842-3.
151. Kogan JR, Conforti LN, Bernabeo E, Iobst W,
Holmboe E. How faculty members experience
workplace-based assessment rater training: a
qualitative study. Med Educ. 2015 Jul;49(7):692-
708. doi:10.1111/medu.12733.
https://t.me/med1917
152. George BC, Teitelbaum EN, DaRosa DA,
et al. Duration of faculty training needed to
ensure reliable OR performance ratings. J Surg
Educ. 2013 Nov-Dec;70(6):703-708.
doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2013.06.015.
153. Steinert Y, Mann K, Centeno A, et al. A
systematic review of faculty development
initiatives designed to improve teaching
effectiveness in medical education: BEME
Guide No. 8. Med Teach. 2006 Sep;28(6):497-
526. doi:10.1080/01421590600902976.
154. Hemmer PA, Dadekian GA, Terndrup C,
et al. Regular formal evaluation sessions are
effective as frame-of-reference training for
faculty evaluators of clerkship medical
students. J Gen Intern Med. 2015
Sep;30(9):1313-1318. doi:10.1007/s11606-015-
3294-6.
155. Steinert Y. Perspective on faculty
development: aiming for 6/6 by 2020. Perspect
Med Educ. 2012 Mar;1(1):31-42.
doi:10.1007/s40037-012-0006-3.
156. Woehr DJ, Huffcutt AI. Rater training for
performance appraisal: a quantitative review. J
Occup Org Psychol. 1994;67:189-205. doi:1
0.1111/j.2044-8325.1994.tb00562.x.
157. Hauenstein NMA. Training raters to
increase the accuracy of appraisals and the
usefulness of feedback. In: Smither JW, ed.
Performance Appraisal. Jossey-Bass; 1998:404-
442.
https://t.me/med1917
158. Stamoulis DT, Hauenstein NMA. Rater
training and rating accuracy: training for
dimensional accuracy versus training for rater
differentiation. J Appl Psychol. 1993;78:994-
1003.
159. Kaplan M. SPIKES: a framework for
breaking bad news to patients with cancer. Clin
J Oncol Nurs. 2010 Aug;14(4):514-516.
doi:10.1188/10.CJON.514-516.
160. Agency for Healthcare Research and
Quality. The SHARE Approach. Accessed
January 16, 2023.
www.ahrq.gov/professionals/education/curriculum-
tools/shareddecisionmaking/index.html
161. Iglehart JK. The uncertain future of
Medicare and graduate medical education. N
Engl J Med. 2011 Oct 6;365(14):1340-1345.
doi:10.1056/NEJMhpr1107519.
162. Chandra A, Khullar D, Wilensky GR. The
economics of graduate medical education. N
Engl J Med. 2014 Jun 19;370(25):2357-2360.
doi:10.1056/NEJMp1402468.
163. Institute of Medicine of the National
Academies. Graduate medical education that
meets the nation’s health needs. 2014. Accessed
January 16, 2023.
www.iom.edu/Reports/2014/GraduateMedical-Education-That-Meets-the-NationsHealth-Needs.aspx
164. ten Cate O. AM last page: what entrustable
professional activities add to a competency-
https://t.me/med1917
based curriculum. Acad Med. 2014
Apr;89(4):691.
doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000000161.
165. Kogan JR, Conforti LN, Holmboe ES.
Faculty perceptions of frame of reference
training to improve workplace-based
assessment. J Grad Med Educ. 2023 Feb;15(1):81–
91. doi:10.4300/JGME-D-22-00287.1.
166. Holmboe ES, Osman NY, Murphy CM,
Kogan JR, The urgency of now: rethinking and
improving assessment practices in medical
education programs. Acad Med. 2023 Apr 18.
doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000005251.
167. Young JQ, Sugarman R, Schwartz J,
O’Sullivan P. Faculty and resident engagement
with WBA tool: use of implementation science
to explore enablers and barriers. Acad Med.
2020 Dec;95(12):1937-1944.
doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000003543.
168. Prentice S, Benson J, Kirkpatrick E,
Schuwirth L. Workplace-based assessments in
postgraduate medical education: a hermeneutic
review. Med Educ. 2020 Nov;54(11):981-992.
doi:10.1111/medu.14221.
169. Anderson HL, Kurtz J, West DC.
Implementation and use of workplace-based
assessment in clinical learning environments: a
scoping review. Acad Med. 2021 Nov
1;96(11S):S164-S174.
doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000004366.
170. Barrett A, Galvin R, Scherpbier AJJA,
https://t.me/med1917
Teunissen PW, O’Shaughnessy A, Horgan M.
Is the learning value of workplace-based
assessment being realized? A qualitative study
of trainer and trainee perceptions and
experiences. Postgrad Med J. 2017
Mar;93(1097):138-142.
doi:10.1136/postgradmedj-2015-133917.
171. van der Vleuten C, Verhoeven B. In-training
assessment developments in postgraduate
education in Europe. ANZ J Surg. 2013
Jun;83(6):454-459. doi:10.1111/ans.12190.
172. Gaunt A, Patel A, Rusius V, Royle TJ,
Markham DH, Pawlikowska T. Playing the
game’: how do surgical trainees seek feedback
using workplace-based assessment? Med Educ.
2017 Sep;51(9):953–962.
doi:10.1111/medu.13380.
173. Fokkema JP, Teunissen PW, Westerman M,
et al. Exploration of perceived effects of
innovations in postgraduate medical
education. Med Educ. 2013 Mar;47(3):271-281.
doi:10.1111/medu.12081.
174. Lefroy J, Watling C, Teunissen PW, Brand P.
Guidelines: the do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of
feedback in clinical education. Perspect Med
Educ. 2015 Dec;4(6):2840289.
doi:10.1007/s40037-015-0231-7.
175. Alves de Lima, Henquin R, Thiere HR, et al.
A qualitative study of the impact on learning of
the mini clinical evaluation exercise in
postgraduate training. Med Teach. 2005
https://t.me/med1917
Jan;27(1):46-52. doi:10.1080/01421590400013529.
176. Ali JM. Getting lost in translation?
Workplace based assessments in surgical
training. Surgeon. 2013 Oct;11(15):286-289.
doi:10.1016/j.surge.2013.03.001.
177. Fokkema JP, Scheele F, Westerman M, et al.
Perceived effects of innovations in
postgraduate medical education: a Q study
focusing on workplace-based assessment. Acad
Med. 2014 Sep;89(9):1259-1266.
doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000000394.
178. Malhotra S, Hatala R, Courneya CA. Internal
medicine residents’ perceptions of the miniclinical evaluation exercise. Med Teach.
2008;30(4):414-419.
doi:10.1080/01421590801946962.
179. Kogan JR, Hatala R, Hauer KE, Holmboe E.
Guidelines: the do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of
direct observation of clinical skills in medical
education. Perspect Med Educ. 2017
Oct;6(5):286-305. doi:10.1007/s40037-017-0376-7.
180. Rogers HD, Carline JD, Paauw DS.
Examination room presentations in general
internal medicine clinic: patients’ and students’
perceptions. Acad Med. 2003 Sep;78(9):945-949.
doi:10.1097/00001888-200309000-00023.
181. Englander R, Holmboe E, Batalden P, et al.
Coproducing health professions education: a
prerequisite to coproducing health care
services? Acad Med. 2020 Jul;95(7):1006-1013.
doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000003137.
https://t.me/med1917
182. PLS Collaborative. Accessed January 16,
2023. www.procedurallearning.org.
183. George BC, Teitelbaum EN, Meyerson SL,
et al. Reliability, validity, and feasibility of the
Zwisch scale for the assessment of
intraoperative performance. J Surg Educ. 2014
Nov-Dec;71(6):e90-e96.
doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.06.018.
184. Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical
Education Direct Observation of Clinical Care.
Accessed January 20, 2023. Assessment
(acgme.org).
https://dl.acgme.org/pages/assessment.
https://t.me/med1917
6
Standardized Patients
Toshiko Uchida, MD, Susannah Cornes, MD
https://t.me/med1917
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана