Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_2823_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
05.09.2026
Размер:
18 Мб
Скачать
internal medicine clerkship. Acad Med. 2000 Feb;75(2):167-
173. doi:10.1097/00001888-200002000-00016.
46. Battistone MJ, Pendleton B, Milne C, et al. Global descriptive evaluations are more responsive than global numeric ratings in detecting students’ progress during the inpatient portion of an internal medicine clerkship. Acad Med. 2001 Oct;76(10 Suppl):S105-S107. doi:10.1097/00001888-
200110001-00035.
47. Battistone MJ, Milne C, Sande MA, Pangaro LN, Hemmer PA, Shomaker TS. The feasibility and acceptability of implementing formal evaluation sessions and using descriptive vocabulary to assess student performance on a clinical clerkship. Teach Learn Med. 2002 Winter;14(1):5-10. doi:10.1207/S15328015TLM1401_3.
48. Ogburn T, Espey E. The R-I-M-E method for evaluation of medical students on an obstetrics and gynecology clerkship. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Sep;189(3):666-669. doi:10.1067/s0002-9378(03)00885-8.
49. Hemmer P, Pangaro LN. The effectiveness of formal evaluation sessions during clinical clerkships in better identifying students with marginal funds of knowledge. Acad Med. 1997 Jul;72(7):641-643. doi:10.1097/00001888-
199707000-00018.
50. Pangaro L, ten Cate O. AMEE Guide—Frameworks for learner assessment in medicine (Theories in Medical Education series). Med Teach. 2013;35:524–537.
https://t.me/med1917
51. Kinnear B, Warm EJ, Caretta-Weyer H, et al. Entrustment unpacked: aligning purposes, stakes, and processes to enhance learner assessment. Acad Med. 2021 Jul 1;96(7S):S56­S63. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000004108.
52. Nabors C, Peterson SJ, Forman L, et al. Operationalizing the internal medicine milestones—an early status report. J Grad Med Educ. 2013 Mar;5(1):130-137. doi:10.4300/JGME-D-
12-00130.1.
53. Warm EJ, Mathis BR, Held JD, et al. Entrustment and mapping of observable practice activities for resident assessment. J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Aug;29(8):1177-1182. doi:10.1007/s11606-014-2801-5.
54. Edgar L, McLean S, Hogan SO, Hamstra S, Holmboe ES. The Milestones Guidebook. Accessed March 19, 2023. at Competency-Based Training (acgme.org)
55. Landy FJ, Farr JL. Performance rating. Psychol Bull. 1980;87:72-107. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.87.1.72.
56. Murphy KR, Cleveland JN. Understanding Performance Appraisal. Sage Publications; 1995.
57. Hauenstein NMA. Training raters to increase the accuracy of appraisals and the usefulness of feedback. In: Smither JW, ed. Performance Appraisal. Jossey Bass; 1998.
58. Rodriguez RG, Hemmer PA. Descriptive evaluations and clinical performance evaluations in the workplace. In: Handbook on Medical Student Evaluation and Assessment. Pangaro LN, McGaghie WC, eds. Gegensatz Press; 2015:77-
https://t.me/med1917
96.
59. Holmboe ES, Fiebach NF, Galaty L, Huot S. The effectiveness of a focused educational intervention on resident evaluations from faculty: a randomized controlled trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Jul;16(7):1-6. doi:10.1046/j.1525-
1497.2001.016007427.x.
60. Direct observation of clinical care (DOCC) assessment tool. Accessed April 7, 2023.
https://dl.acgme.org/pages/assessment.
61. Norman GR, Van der Vleuten CP, De Graaff E. Pitfalls in the pursuit of objectivity: issues of validity, efficiency and acceptability. Med Educ. 1991 Mar;25(2):119-126. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.1991.tb00037.x.
62. Andolsek K, Padmore J, Hauer KE, Ekpenyong A, Edgar L, Holmboe ES. Clinical Competency Committees: A Guidebook for Programs. Accessed March 26, 2023.
www.acgme.org.
63. Pangaro LN. System approaches to student assessment. In: Pangaro LN, McGaghie WC, eds. Handbook of Medical Student Assessment and Evaluation. Gegensatz Press; 2015.
64. Rekman J, Gofton W, Dudek N, Gifton T, Hamstra SJ. Entrustability scales: outlining their usefulness for competency-based clinical assessment. Acad Med. 2016 Feb;91(2):186-190. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000001045.
65. Downing SM. Reliability: on the reproducibility of assessment data. Med Educ. 2004 Sep;38(9):1006-1012.
https://t.me/med1917
doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01932.x.
66. Park YS, Hamstra SJ, Yamazaki K, Holmboe E. Longitudinal reliability of milestones-based learning trajectories in family medicine residents. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Dec 1;4(12):e2137179. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.37179.
67. Weller JM, Misur M, Nicolson S, et al: Can I leave the theatre? A key to more reliable workplace-based assessment. Br J Anaesth. 2014 Jun;112(6):1083-1091. doi:10.1093/bja/aeu052.
68. Gingerich A, Kogan J, Yeates P, Govaerts M, Holmboe E. Seeing the ‘black box’ differently: assessor cognition from three research perspectives. Med Educ. 2014 Nov;48(11):1055-1068. doi:10.1111/medu.12546.
69. Downing SM, Haladyna TM. Validity threats: overcoming interference with proposed interpretations of assessment data. Med Educ. 2004 Mar;38(3):327-333. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2923.2004.01777.x.
70. Downing SM. Validity: on meaningful interpretation of assessment data. Med Educ. 2003 Sep;37(9):830-837. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01594.x.
71. Post RE, Jamena GP, Gamble JD. Using Precept-Assist to predict performance on the American Board of Family Medicine on In-Training Examination. Fam Med. 2014 Sep;46(8):603-607.
72. Schwartz RW, Donnelly MB, Sloan DA, Johnson SB,
https://t.me/med1917
Strodel WE. The relationship between faculty ward evaluations, OSCE and ABSITE as measures of surgical intern performance. Am J Surg. 1995 Apr;169(4):414-417. doi:10.1016/s0002-9610(99)80187-1.
73. Hawkins RE, Sumption KF, Gaglione M, Holmboe ES. The In-training Examination (ITE) in internal medicine: resident perceptions and correlation between resident ITE scores and faculty predictions of resident performance. Am J Med. 1999 Feb;106(2):206-210. doi:10.1016/s0002-
9343(98)00392-1.
74. Bienstock JL, Shivraj P, Yamazaki K, et al. Correlations between Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Obstetrics and Gynecology Milestones and American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology qualifying examination scores: an initial validity study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Mar;224(3):308.e1-308.e25. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2020.10.029.
75. Francisco GE, Yamazaki K, Raddatz M, et al. Do milestone ratings predict physical medicine and rehabilitation (PM&R) board certification examination scores? Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 Feb 1;100(2S Suppl
1):S34-S39. doi:10.1097/PHM.0000000000001613.
76. Hauer KE, Vandergrift J, Lipner RS, Holmboe ES, Hood S, McDonald FS. National internal medicine milestone ratings: validity evidence from longitudinal three-year follow-up. Acad Med. 2018 Aug;93(8):1189-1204. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000002234.
https://t.me/med1917
77. Paolo AM, Bonaminio GA. Measuring outcomes of undergraduate medical education: residency directors’ ratings of first year residents. Acad Med. 2003 Jan;78(1):90-
95. doi:10.1097/00001888-200301000-00017.
78. Durning SJ, Pangaro LN, Lawrence LL, Waechter D, McManigle J, Jackson JL. The feasibility, reliability, and validity of a program director’s (supervisor’s) evaluation form for medical school graduates. Acad Med. 2005 Oct;80(10):964-968. doi:10.1097/00001888-200510000-00018.
79. Papadakis MA, Teherani A, Banach MA, et al. Disciplinary action by medical boards and prior behavior in medical school. N Engl J Med. 2005 Dec 22;353(25):2673-2682. doi:10.1056/NEJMsa052596.
80. Papadakis MA, Arnold GK, Blank LL, Holmboe ES, Lipner RS. Performance during internal medicine residency training and subsequent disciplinary action by state licensing boards. Ann Intern Med. 2008 Jun 3;148(11):869-876. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-148-11-200806030-00009.
81. Heath JK, Wang T, Santhosh L, et al. Longitudinal milestone assessment extending through subspecialty training: the relationship between ACGME internal medicine residency milestones and subsequent pulmonary and critical care fellowship milestones. Acad Med. 2021 Nov 1;96(11):1603-1608. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000004165.
82. Han M, Hamstra SJ, Hogan SO, et al. JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Apr 3;6(4):e237588. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.7588.
https://t.me/med1917
83. Smith B, Yamazaki K, Tekian A, et al. ACGME milestone ratings of surgeon competence during training predict early career patient outcomes. Submitted 2023.
84. Thompson WG, Lipkin M Jr, Gilbert DA, Guzzo RA, Roberson L. Evaluation: assessment of the American Board of Internal Medicine resident evaluation form. J Gen Intern Med. 1990 May-Jun;5(3):214. doi:10.1007/BF02600537.
85. Silber CG, Nasca TJ, Paskin DL, Eiger G, Robeson M, Veloski JJ. Do global rating forms enable program directors to assess the ACGME competencies? Acad Med. 2004 Jun;79(6):549-556. doi:10.1097/00001888-200406000-00010.
86. Yamazaki K, Holmboe ES, Hamstra SJ. An empirical investigation into milestones factor structure using national data derived from clinical competency committees. Acad Med. 2022 Apr 1;97(4):569-576. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000004218.
87. Feinstein A. Principles of Medical Statistics. Chapman and Hall/CRC; 2002.
88. Holmboe ES. The importance of faculty observation of trainees’ clinical skills. Acad Med. 2004 Jan;79(1):16-22. doi:10.1097/00001888-200401000-00006.
89. Byrne A, Soskova T, Dawkins J, Coombes L. A pilot study of marking accuracy and mental workload as measures of OSCE examiner performance. BMC Med Educ. 2016 Jul 25;16:191. doi:10.1186/s12909-016-0708-z.
90. Gingerich A. What if the ‘trust’ in entrustable were a
https://t.me/med1917
social judgement? Med Educ. 2015 Aug;49(8):750-752. doi:10.1111/medu.12772.
91. Gingerich A, Regehr G, Eva KW. Rater-based assessments as social judgments: rethinking the etiology of rater errors. Acad Med. 2011 Oct;86(10 Suppl):S1-S7. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e31822a6cf8.
92. Schumacher DJ, Holmboe E, Carraccio C, et al. Resident­sensitive quality measures in the pediatric emergency department: exploring relationships with supervisor entrustment and patient complexity and acuity. Acad Med. 2020 Aug;95(8):1256-1264. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000003242.
* For this chapter we will use the words assessment and
evaluation interchangeably.
https://t.me/med1917
5
Direct Observation
Jennifer R. Kogan, MD, Eric S. Holmboe, MD
https://t.me/med1917
Chapter Outline
Introduction Direct Observation as Workplace-Based Assessment Rationale for Direct Observation
Importance of and State of Core Clinical Skills Direct Observation as an Educational Tool for
Feedback and Deliberate Practice
Direct Observation as an Assessment Method in
Competency-Based Medical Education
Direct Observation as a Method to Guide
Supervision
Assessment Tools for Direct Observation
Assessment Tool Format
Issues With Reliability and Validity
Accuracy Variable Assessment Standards Role of Inference Impact of Educational Culture Rater Limitations and Bias Conceptual Model Summarizing Rater Cognition
Improving the Quality of Direct Observation Assessments
Overview of Faculty Development Approaches to
Improve Assessment Quality Motivating Faculty to Participate in Rater Training Performance Dimension Training Frame of Reference Training Recognizing Inference Prioritizing Observations and Creating a Summary
https://t.me/med1917