Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_2823_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана
.pdf
programmes. Med Educ. 1996 Mar;30(2):83-89.
doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.1996.tb00724.x.
80. Noel GL, Herbers JE, Caplow MP, Cooper
GS, Pangaro LN, Harvey J. How well do
internal medicine faculty members evaluate the
clinical skills of residents? Ann Intern Med.
1992 Nov 1;117(9):757-765. doi:10.7326/0003-
4819-117-9-757.
81. Regehr G, Freeman R, Robb A, Missiha N,
Heisey R. OSCE performance evaluations made
by standardized patients: comparing checklist
and global rating scores. Acad Med. 1999
Oct;74(10 Suppl):S135-S137.
doi:10.1097/00001888-199910000-00064.
82. Norcini J, Boulet J. Methodological issues in
the use of standardized patients for
assessment. Teach Learn Med. 2003
Fall;15(4):293-297.
doi:10.1207/S15328015TLM1504_12.
83. Tavares W, Eva KW. Impact of rating
demands on rater-based assessments of clinical
competence. Educ Prim Care. 2014
Nov;25(6):308-318.
doi:10.1080/14739879.2014.11730760.
84. Tavares W, Ginsburg S, Eva KW. Selecting
and simplifying: rater performance and
behavior when considering multiple
competencies. Teach Learn Med. 2016;28(1):41-
51. doi:10.1080/10401334.2015.1107489.
85. Tavares W, Eva KW. Exploring the impact of
mental workload on rater-based assessments.
https://t.me/med1917
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2013
May;18(2):291-303. doi:10.1007/s10459-012-
9370-3.
86. Paravattil H, Wilby KJ. Optimizing assessors’
mental workload in rater-based assessment: a
critical narrative review. Perspect Med Educ.
2019 Dec;8(6):339-345. doi:10.1007/s40037-019-
00535-6.
87. Donato AA, Pangaro L, Smith C., et al.
Evaluation of a novel assessment form for
observing medical residents: a randomised,
controlled trial. Med Educ. 2008
Dec;42(12):1234-1242. doi:10.1111/j.1365-
2923.2008.03230.x.
88. Donato AA, Park YS, George DL, Schwartz A,
Yudkowsky R. Validity and feasibility of the
minicard direct observation tool in 1 training
program. J Grad Med Educ. 2015 Jun;7(2):225-
229. doi:10.4300/JGME-D-14-00532.1.
89. Weller JM, Misur M, Nicolson S, et al. Can I
leave the theatre? A key to more reliable
workplace-based assessment. Br J Anaesth.
2014 Jun;112(6):1083-1091.
doi:10.1093/bja/aeu052.
90. Duijn CCMA, van Dijk EJ, Mandoki M, Bok
HGJ, Cate OTJT. Assessment tools for feedback
and entrustment decisions in the clinical
workplace: a systematic review. J Vet Med
Educ. 2019 Fall;46(3):340-52.
doi:10.3138/jvme.0917-123r.
91. Rekman J, Gofton W, Dudek N, Gofton T,
https://t.me/med1917
Hamstra SJ. Entrustability scales: outlining
their usefulness for competency-based clinical
assessment. Acad Med. 2015 Feb;91(2):186-190.
doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000001045.
92. Crossley J, Johnson G, Booth J, Wade W.
Good questions, good answers: construct
alignment improves the performance of
workplace-based assessment scales. Med Educ.
2011 Jun;45(6):560-569. doi:10.1111/j.1365-
2923.2010.03913.x.
93. Ten Cate O, Schwartz A, Chen HC. Assessing
trainees and making entrustment decisions: on
the nature and use of entrustment-supervision
scales. Acad Med. 2020 Nov;95(11):1662-1669.
doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000003427.
94. Kelleher M, Kinnear B, Sall D, et al. A
reliability analysis of entrustment-derived
workplace-based assessments. Acad Med. 2020
Apr;95(4):616-622.
doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000002997.
95. Dudek N, Gofton W, Rekman J, McDougall
A. Faculty and resident perspectives on using
entrustment anchors for workplace-based
assessment. J Grad Med Educ. 2019
Jun;11(3):287-294. doi:10.4300/JGME-D-18-
01003.1.
96. Hatala R, Ginsburg S, Hauer KE, Gingerich
A. Entrustment ratings in internal medicine
training: capturing meaningful supervision
decisions or just another rating? J Gen Intern
Med. 2019 May;34(5):740-743.
https://t.me/med1917
doi:10.1007/s11606-019-04878-y.
97. Kinnear B, Warm E, Caretta-Eyer H, et al.
Entrustment unpacked: aligning purposes,
stakes, and processes to enhance learner
assessment. Acad Med. 2021 Jul 1;96(7S):S56S63. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000004108.
98. Gingerich A, Daniels V, Farrell L, Olsen SR,
Kennedy T, Hatala R. Beyond hands-on and
hands-off: supervisory approaches and
entrustment on the inpatient ward. Med Educ.
2018 Oct;52(10):1028-1040.
doi:10.1111/medu.13621.
99. Kogan JR, Dine CJ, Conforti LN, et al. Can
rater training improve the quality and accuracy
of workplace-based assessment narrative
comments and entrustment ratings? A
randomized controlled trial. Acad Med. 2023
Feb 1;98(2):237-247.
doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000004819.
100. Ryan MS, Khamishon R, Richards A, Perera
R, Garber A, Santen SA. A question of scale?
Generalizability of the Ottawa and Chen scales
to render entrustment decisions for the core
EPAs in the workplace. Acad Med. 2022 Apr
1;97(4):552-561.
doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000004189.
101. Hatala R, Sawatsky AP, Dudek N, Ginsburg
S, Cook DA. Using in-training evaluation
report ITER) qualitative comments to assess
medical students and residents: a systematic
review. Acad Med. 2017 Jun;92(6):868-879.
https://t.me/med1917
doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000001506.
102. Young JQ, Sugarman R, Holmboe E,
O’Sullivan PS. Advancing our understanding
of narrative comments generated by direct
observation tools: lessons from
psychopharmacology-structured clinical
observation. J Grad Med Educ. 2019
Oct;11(5):570-579. doi:10.4300/JGME-D-19-
00207.1.
103. Ginsberg S, Watling CJ, Schumacher DJ,
Gingerich A, Hatala R. Numbers encapsulate,
words elaborate: towards the best use of
comments for assessment and feedback on
entrustment ratings. Acad Med. 2021 Jul
1;96(7S):S81-S86.
doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000004089.
104. Martin L, Sibbald M, Vegas DB, Russell D,
Govaerts M. The impact of entrustment
assessments on feedback and learning: trainee
perspectives. Med Educ. 2020 Apr;54(4):328-
336. doi:10.1111/medu.14047.
105. Scarff CE, Bearman M, Chiavaroli N,
Trumble S. Trainees' perceptions of assessment
messages: a narrative systematic review. Med
Educ. 2019 Mar;53(3):221-233.
doi:10.1111/medu.13775.
106. Herbers JE, Noel GL, Cooper GS, Harvey J,
Pangaro LN, Weaver MJ. How accurate are
faculty evaluations of clinical competence? J
Gen Intern Med. 1989 May-Jun;4(3):202-208.
doi:10.1007/BF02599524.
https://t.me/med1917
107. Kalet A, Earp JA, Kowlowitz V. How well
do faculty evaluate the interviewing skills of
medical students? J Gen Intern Med. 1992 SepOct;7(5):499-505. doi:10.1007/BF02599452.
108. Elliot DL, Hickam DH. Evaluation of
physical examination skills. Reliability of
faculty observers and patient instructors.
JAMA. 1987 Dec 18;258(23):3405-3408.
109. Gauthier G, St-Onge C, Tavares W. Rater
cognition: review and integration of research
findings. Med Educ. 2016 May;50(5):511-522.
doi:10.1111/medu.12973.
110. Gingerich A, Kogan J, Yeates P, Govaerts M,
Holmboe E. Seeing the ‘black box’ differently:
assessor cognition from three research
perspectives. Med Educ. 2014 Nov;48(11):1055-
1068. doi:10.1111/medu.12546.
111. Kogan JR, Conforti L, Bernabeo E, Iobst W,
Holmboe E. Opening the black box of clinical
skills assessment via observation: a conceptual
model. Med Educ. 2011 Oct;45(10):1048-1060.
doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04025.x.
112. Yeates P, O’Neill P, Mann K, Eva K. Seeing
the same thing differently: mechanisms that
contribute to assessor differences in directlyobserved performance assessment. Adv Health
Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2013 Aug;18(3):325-341.
doi:10.1007/s10459-012-9372-1.
113. Govaerts MJ, Van de Wiel MW, Schuwirth
LW, Van der Vleuten CPM, Muijtjens AMM.
Workplace-based assessment: raters’
https://t.me/med1917
performance theories and constructs. Adv
Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2013
Aug;18(3):375-396. doi:10.1007/s10459-012-
9376-x.
114. Berendonk C, Stalmeijer RE, Schuwirth LW.
Expertise in performance assessment:
assessors’ perspectives. Adv Health Sci Educ
Theory Pract. 2013 Oct;18(4):559-571.
doi:10.1007/s10459-012-9392-x.
115. Paauw DS, Wenrich MD, Curtis JR, Carline
JD, Ramsey PG. Ability of primary care
physicians to recognize physical findings
associated with HIV infection. JAMA. 1995
Nov 1;274(17):1380-1382.
116. Kogan JR, Hess BJ, Conforti LN, Holmboe
ES. What drives faculty ratings of residents’
clinical skills? The impact of faculty’s own
clinical skills. Acad Med. 2010 Oct;85(S10):S25S28. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181ed1aa3.
117. Govaerts MJ, Schuwirth LW, van der
Vleuten CP, Muijtjens AM. Workplace-based
assessment: effects of rater expertise. Adv
Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2011
May;16(2):151-165. doi:10.1007/s10459-010-
9250-7.
118. Friedman Z, Bould MD, Matava C, Alam H.
Investigating faculty assessment of anesthesia
trainees and the failing-to-fail phenomenon: a
randomized controlled trial. Can J Anaesth.
2021 Jul;68(7):1000-1007. doi:10.1007/s12630-
021-01971-x.
https://t.me/med1917
119. Swails JL, Gadgil MA, Goodrum H, Gupta
R, Rahbar MH, Bernstam EV. Role of faculty
characteristics in failing to fail in clinical
clerkships. Med Educ. 2022 Jun;56(6):634-640.
doi:10.1111/medu.14725.
120. Dudek NL, Marks MB, Regehr G. Failure to
fail: the perspectives of clinical supervisors.
Acad Med. 2005 Oct;80(10 Suppl):S84-S87.
doi:10.1097/00001888-200510001-00023.
121. Cleland JA, Knight LV, Rees CE, Tracey S,
Bond CM. Is it me or is it them? Factors that
influence the passing of underperforming
students. Med Educ. 2008 Aug;42(8):800-809.
doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03113.x.
122. Yeates P, O’Neill P, Mann K, Eva KW. Effect
of exposure to good vs poor medical trainee
performance on attending physician ratings of
subsequent performances. JAMA. 2012 Dec
5;308(21):2226-2232.
doi:10.1001/jama.2012.36515.
123. Yeates P, O’Neill P, Mann K, Eva K. ‘You’re
certainly relatively competent’: assessor bias
due to recent experiences. Med Educ. 2013
Sep;47(9):910-922. doi:10.1111/medu.12254.
124. Yeates P, Cardell J, Byrne G, Eva KW.
Relatively speaking: contrast effects influence
assessors’ scores and narrative feedback. Med
Educ. 2015 Sep;49(9):909-919.
doi:10.1111/medu.12777.
125. Gingerich A, Schokking E, Yeates P.
https://t.me/med1917
of preceding performances on assessors' focus
and interpretations in written assessment
comments. Adv Heath Sci Educ Theory Pract.
2018 Dec;23(5):937-959. doi:10.1007/s10459-018-
9841-2.
126. Hagiwara N, Kron FW, Scerbo MW, Watson
GS. A call for grounding implicit bias training
in clinical and translational frameworks.
Lancet. 2020 May 2;395(10234):1457-1460.
doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30846-1.
127. Teherani A, Hauer KE, Fernandez A, King
TE Jr, Lucey C. How small differences in
assessed clinical performance amplify to large
differences in grades and awards: a cascade
with serious consequences for students
underrepresented in medicine. Acad Med. 2018
Sep;93(9):1286-1292.
doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000002323.
128. Klein R, Ufere NN, Schaeffer S, et al.
Association between resident race and
ethnicity and clinical performance assessment
scores in graduate medical education. Acad
Med. 2022 Sep 1;97(9):1351-1359.
doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000004743.
129. Low D, Pollack SW, Liao ZC, et al.
Racial/ethnic disparities in clinical grading in
medical school. Teach Learn Med. 2019 OctDec;31(5):487-496.
doi:10.1080/10401334.2019.1597724.
130. Arkin N, Lai C, Kiwakyou LM, et al. What’s
in a word? Qualitative and quantitative
https://t.me/med1917
analysis of leadership language in
anesthesiology resident feedback. J Grad Med
Educ. 2019 Feb;11(1):44-52. doi:10.4300/JGME-
D-18-00377.1.
131. Mueller AS, Jenkins TM, Osborne M, Dayal
A, O’Connor DM, Arora VM. Gender
differences in attending physicians’ feedback to
residents: a qualitative analysis. J Grad Med
Educ. 2017 Oct;9(5):577-585. doi:10.4300/JGME-
D-17-00126.1.
132. Klein R, Julian KA, Snyder ED, et al. Gender
bias in resident assessment in graduate medical
education: review of the literature. J Gen Intern
Med. 2019 May;34(5):712-719.
doi:10.1007/s11606-019-04884-0.
133. Li S, Fant AL, McCarthy DM, Miller D,
Craig J, Kontrick A. Gender differences in
language of standardized letter of evaluation
narratives for emergency medicine residency
applicants. AEM Educ Train. 2017 Sep
19;1(4):334-339. doi:10.1002/aet2.10057.
134. Chen S, Beck Dallaghan GL, Shaheen A.
Implicit gender bias in third-year surgery
clerkship MSPE narratives. J Surg Educ. 2021
Jul-Aug;78(4):1136-1143.
doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.10.011.
135. Khan S, Kirubarajan A, Shamsheri T,
Clayton A, Mehta G. Gender bias in reference
letters for residency and academic medicine: a
systematic review. Postgrad Med J. 2023 May
22;99(1170):272-278. doi:10.1136/postgradmedj-
https://t.me/med1917
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана