Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_1137_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Foreword
- •Preface
- •Acknowledgements
- •1 Anal Fissure
- •1.1 Introduction
- •1.3 Anal Incontinence
- •1.4 What Should Be Done if Incontinence Develops?
- •1.5 Anal Sepsis
- •1.7 Tricks of the Trade
- •1.8 An Unforgettable Complication
- •Summary
- •Suggested Readings
- •2 Hemorrhoids
- •2.1 Introduction
- •2.2 Surgical Complications After Manual Hemorrhoidectomy (Ferguson and Milligan-Morgan Procedures): Live from the Operating Room
- •1.6 Suture Dehiscence
- •2.3 THD/DGHAL and Mucopexy (Doppler-guided, Laser-assisted)
- •2.4 Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy (PPH)
- •2.4.1 Hemorrhage
- •2.4.2 Other Complications
- •2.4.6 Rectal Inclusion Cysts
- •2.4.7 Total Obliteration of the Rectal Lumen
- •2.4.8 Rectal Diverticulum or Rectal Pocket Syndrome
- •2.4.9 Rectovaginal Fistulae
- •2.4.11 Dysplasia and Cancer
- •2.4.12 Retro-rectal Hematoma
- •2.4.13 Hemoperitoneum
- •2.4.15 Rectal Perforation and Pelvic Sepsis
- •2.4.16 Thrombosis of the Inferior Vena Cava
- •2.5 Complications After Other Operations
- •2.5.1 Semi-open or Semi-closed Hemorrhoidectomy
- •2.5.2 Farag Suturing of Internal Hemorrhoids
- •2.5.3 Hussein’s Manual Hemorrhoidopexy
- •2.5.5 Parks’ Submucosal Hemorrhoidectomy
- •2.5.6 Coagulation of Hemorrhoids
- •2.6 Treating the Complications
- •2.6.1 Pain
- •2.6.2 Urinary Retention
- •2.6.3 Hemorrhage
- •2.6.4 Fecaloma
- •2.6.5 Thrombosed External Hemorrhoids
- •2.6.6 Anal or Rectal Stenosis
- •2.6.7 Anal Fissure
- •2.6.8 Abscess or Fistula
- •2.6.9 Skin Tags
- •2.6.10 Anal Incontinence
- •2.6.11 Severe Anal Sepsis
- •2.6.12 Fournier’s Gangrene
- •2.6.13 Unusual Complications after PPH
- •2.7 Tricks of the Trade
- •2.8 Two Unforgettable Complications
- •2.8.1 Case Number One
- •2.8.2 Case Number Two
- •Summary
- •Suggested Readings
- •3 Anal Abscesses and Fistulae
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.2 Postoperative Bleeding
- •3.3 Iatrogenic Fistula
- •3.6 The Prevention of Postoperative Anal Incontinence
- •3.7 The Management of Postoperative Anal Incontinence
- •3.9 Tricks of the Trade
- •3.10 An Unforgettable Complication
- •Summary
- •Suggested Readings
- •4 Rectovaginal Fistulae
- •4.1 Introduction
- •4.2 Types of Operations and Postoperative Complications
- •4.3 Bleeding and Dyspareunia
- •4.3.1 Bleeding
- •4.3.2 Dyspareunia
- •4.4 Local Sepsis and Suture Dehiscence
- •4.5 Re-interventions
- •4.6 Drains
- •4.7 Fecal Incontinence
- •4.8 An Unforgettable Complication
- •Summary
- •Suggested Readings
- •5 Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal Sinus
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.2 Types of Operations
- •5.3 Postoperative Bleeding
- •5.4 Local Sepsis and Suture Dehiscence
- •5.5 The Prevention of Local Sepsis
- •5.7 Sinus Pilonidalis Associated with Anal Fistula or Abscess
- •5.8 An Unforgettable Complication
- •Summary
- •Suggested Readings
- •6.7 Two Unforgettable Complications
- •6.7.1 Case Number One
- •6.7.2 Case Number Two
- •Summary
- •Suggested Readings
- •6 Tumors of the Rectum and Anus
- •6.1 Introduction
- •6.2 TEM or Transanal Endoscopic Mucosectomy
- •6.3 Transanal Submucosal Excision According to Parks: “Live Surgery”
- •6.4 Other Transanal Techniques
- •6.4.1 Through the Rigid Sigmoidoscope
- •6.4.2 Using an endoGIA or a Urologic Resectoscope
- •6.5 Non-transanal Local Excision
- •6.5.1 The York-Mason Procedure
- •6.5.2 Kraske Operation
- •6.5.3 Intersphincteric Resection
- •7 Anal Condylomata and Anorectal Stricture
- •7.1 Introduction
- •7.2 Complications After Surgery for Anal Condylomata
- •7.4 Complications After Surgery for Rectal Stricture
- •7.5 “Live Surgery”: The Prevention of Postoperative Complications After Anoplasty
- •7.6 A Trick of the Trade
- •7.7 An Unforgettable Complication
- •Summary
- •Suggested Readings
- •8 Obstructed Defecation (OD) and Related Diseases
- •8.1 Introduction
- •8.2 Our Relevant Complications Following Surgery for Obstructed Defecation
- •8.3 Postoperative Complications After Internal Delorme
- •8.5 The Prevention of Postoperative Incontinence
- •8.6 The Treatment of Postoperative Incontinence
- •8.7 Postoperative Complications After STARR and Transtar
- •8.8 Other Operations for Rectocele Using a Transanal Stapler
- •8.8.1 Circular Stapler
- •8.8.2 Linear Stapler
- •8.9 Postoperative Complications After Rectocele Repair Using Prosthetic Meshes
- •8.11 Operating on a Patient with Solitary Rectal Ulcer Syndrome (SRUS) and Obstructed Defecation
- •8.12 Two Unforgettable Complications
- •8.12.1 Case Number One
- •8.12.2 Case Number Two
- •Summary
- •Suggested Readings
- •9 Fecal Incontinence
- •9.1 Introduction
- •9.3 Anterior Levatorplasty
- •9.4 Sphincter Reconstruction
- •9.5 Sacral Neuromodulation
- •9.5.1 Radiofrequency Energy
- •9.6.1 Graciloplasty
- •9.6.2 Gluteoplasty
- •9.7 Artificial Sphincter
- •9.8 Bulking Agents
- •9.9 Puborectalis Sling and Silicone Ring
- •9.9.1 Puborectalis Sling
- •9.9.2 Silicone Ring
- •9.10 Trick of the Trade
- •9.11 Unforgettable Complications
- •9.11.1 The First Five
- •9.11.2 The Last One
- •Summary
- •Suggested Readings
- •10 External Rectal Prolapse
- •10.1 Introduction
- •10.4 Complications After the Altemeier Procedure (Perineal Proctosigmoidectomy)
- •10.5 Complications After Other Procedures
- •10.5.2 Transvaginal Sacrospinous Rectopexy
- •10.5.3 Manual Transanal Rectal Prolapse Excision
- •10.6 Circular Stapled Transanal Prolapsectomy
- •10.7 Transanal Rectal Prolapsectomy Using the Contour Stapling Device
- •10.9 An Unforgettable Complication
- •Summary
- •Suggested Readings
- •Subject Index

8
1 Anal Fissure
sumed to be due to sepsis) in a case series of
Chambers et al. (2010).
1.6 Suture Dehiscence
Suture dehiscence is most common in patients with
diabetes or Crohn’s disease. In these cases,
Yakovlev et al. (2011) suggest to perform a temporary sacral nerve stimulation.
In perianal wounds, a suture breakdown is not
particularly problematic; the wound is small (it
should not be > 1-2 cm) and will heal by secondary intention. The only shortcut possible is to use
catgut (which is often not available) or Vicryl
Rapid which gives way if sepsis develops underneath so that the pus can drain off. Moreo ver,
Nelson (2005) demonstrated that, among the surgical wounds made in treating anal fissure, the lateral internal sphincterotomy wound heals best and
the most quickly.
We now shift the discussion to sutures of the
mucosal or, more frequently, cutaneous flap used
in anoplasty. As mentioned earlier, a small dehiscence of this suture occurred in 3 out of 21 of my
patients. Fortunately, there was only a slight dehiscence (involving 2-3 stitches) and there were no
significant consequences, except for delayed
wound healing (Fig. 1.6). The wounds did not
become chronic and the fissures did not recur. The
same problem was seen in 2 of the 16 patients of
Patti et al. (already cited) but neither patient had to
undergo re-operation. However, one of the 3
patients of Chambers et al. (cited above) who
developed suture dehiscence required re-operation.
Kundall et al. (2003) reported that hyperbaric
oxygen therapy is effective for patients with surgical
wounds that do not heal with any other treatment.
Can the method used to perform anoplasty
influence the risk of dehiscence? Probably it can,
even though I do not know of any randomized trials on this subject. Various authors have emphasized the fact that they did not use electrocautery
to prepare the skin flap, did not harvest the flap
from the posterior commissure (the midline is less
well vascularized), and did remove the underlying
fibrotic tissue (in order to place the sutures in
healthy tissue). These are elementary principles of
plastic surgery and I adhere to them as well.
There was no anal stenosis after anoplasty in
my patients but it has been described in the literature. This is one of the dangers associated with a
large dehiscence. Patients at risk should be advised
to perform self-dilatation at home, for instance
with Dilatan from Sapimed.
If the wound persists, wound healing agents,
such as oil-based VEA, Colostrum, Vulnamin,
Abound, Cicatrene, or Fitostimoline, should be
prescribed. If there is also anal hypertonia, which
may slow down or impede healing, it can be treat-
Fig. 1.6 Partial dehiscence of
cutaneous anoplasty (asterisk)
after excision of a chronic fissure in a patient without anal
hypertonia. The anorectal ring
is pink. Cutaneous flap detachment from the epithelium of
the high anal canal reveals the
underlying sphincteric fibers

1.7 Tricks of the Trade
9
ed with Antrolin, a calcium channel blocker and
analgesic, or Rectogesic (active ingredient: nitroglycerin); these are creams for topical use.
Dermatrans and similar medications, i.e., patches
that release nitrates that cause vasodilatation and
relax the sphincter, can also be used but they
should not be given to patients who are hypotensive, on vasodilating drugs, or who are pregnant.
The main side effect is headache. In cases of
hypertonia and subacute stenosis, anal dilators
such as Dilatan can be prescribed.
One more thing to note, not about skin flaps but
about the skin incision in sphincterotomy, is that it
heals more slowly if made posteriorly (Saad and
Omer, 1992) because, as mentioned above, the
blood supply to this area is very limited.
1.7 Tricks of the Trade
This is the first Tricks of the Trade section. Some of
these tricks will already be familiar to the reader,
others will seem to be self-evident, but in any case
they are worth mentioning. In addition, please be
aware that in the journal Techniques in
Coloproctology of which I am the Editor-in-Chief
(www.springerlink.com) there is also a Tricks of
the Trade section, to which one’s own tricks can be
submitted. Consult the Instructions for Authors
regarding online contributions.
As for tricks related to anal fissures:
1. The risk of intraoperative bleeding can be kept
to a minimum during internal sphincterotomy.
Instead of dividing the muscle with scissors or
electrocautery, rest the tip of the (very narrow,
blunt) forceps on the distal edge of the sphincter and then ask the instruments nurse to touch
the forceps with the electrocautery device.
Dissection will occur gradually and with only
minimal bleeding (Fig. 1.7).
2. Another tip for obtaining good hemostasis: If
after internal sphincterotomy the dissection
margins bleed, avoid becoming obsessed with
coagulating because the end result might be
ischemia, necrosis, and ulceration of the
epithelium of the anal canal and thus an
endoanal wound that is very slow to heal.
Instead, first try this: use your finger to exert
pressure on the area; then infiltrate the area
with adrenaline, with or without a needle.
3. If the fissure is deep and has hard thick margins
and you are concerned that simple curettage is
not sufficient to remove it or that it might contain neoplastic cells, use scissors or electrocautery to obtain removal and, if necessary,
send the specimen for histological analysis. If
the patient has anal hypertonia or if you have
decided to proceed with an internal sphincterotomy anyway, try to avoid a lateral sphincterotomy, although it is commonly performed,
Fig. 1.7 Electrocauterization
“transferred” to the clamp used
to perform a hemostatic lateral
internal sphincterotomy. Direct
electrocauterization by the
electrocautery tip is more likely to cause intraoperative
bleeding

10
1 Anal Fissure
because this will result in a second surgical
wound, thus preventing the patient’s unproblematic recovery. In these cases, I perform a
posterior sphincterotomy at the point where the
fissure has been excised and the internal
sphincter exposed. The wound is then covered
with anoplasty using the Arnoux or the Martin
technique, just barely lowering the mucosa of
the distal rectum. Or better yet, to avoid the risk
of ectropion of the mucosa, the epithelium of
the proximal part of the anal canal can be used
to cover the surgical defect. It is advisable to
perform this repair because otherwise, as mentioned earlier, there is a less resistant triangular
area which might cause soiling. This trick is
especially helpful in patients with Crohn’s disease or diabetes, since their wounds heal less
easily and two surgical wounds are obviously a
bigger problem than one. However, this
approach is not recommended for patients who
already had soiling preoperatively since it will
aggravate their problems with incontinence.
But, as repeatedly stated in this chapter, in the
patient with anal hypotone, it is better to avoid
sphincterotomy in the first place.
1.8 An Unforgettable Complication
Now for the first in a series of striking postoperative complications that I have observed in my
career, after performing anorectal and pelvic floor
surgery. Each one is presented as an interactive
exercise. Halfway through, the reader is asked:
What happened next? Why did the complication
occur? What would you have done?
Note: After nearly all of these complications,
there is a drawing that sums up the dynamics of the
situation and the treatment. I would suggest that, if
you choose to participate in the exercise, do not
look at the drawing until you have finished reading
the case report; otherwise you will obviously discover ahead of time how the problem was solved.
The patient in our first unforgettable complication was a psychologically stable 47-year-old
woman suffering from chronic constipation, proctalgia, and moderate rectal bleeding.
Her general practitioner found that she had an
anal fissure, which was treated with an analgesic
cream containing cortisone. As this was unsuc-
cessful, the patient decided to consult with a specialist, who after digital rectal examination diagnosed an internal mucosal prolapse of the rectum.
The woman was operated on a few days later,
undergoing a stapled transanal rectal resection
(STARR). Neither proctoscopy, nor manometry,
nor transanal ultrasound was performed preoperatively.
A week later, the patient developed a high fever
and abdominal pain, and was found to have suture
dehiscence and anal stenosis. A few months later,
she sought a new surgeon and came to me. She had
obstructed defecation, tenesmus, and rectal bleeding. The results of the various diagnostic tests
revealed, among other things, retained staples,
some of which were floating in the lumen of the
rectum. I therefore decided to operate and found a
fistula and a rectal diverticulum, both results of the
earlier dehiscence, as well as a rectal stenosis.
So, what would you do at this point?
I laid open the fistula and diverticulum,
removed the staples, and performed an anoplasty
(Figs. 1.8 and 1.9).
The patient improved for a few months but then
had a recurrence of intense proctalgia, with the
pain occurring upon defecation, which had a very
negative effect on her quality of life. Boccasanta et
al. (2004) reported that 20% of patients who
undergo STARR develop painful defecation. Since
my patient refused a temporary colostomy, I suggested a period of total parenteral nutrition at
home so that her intestine could recover and she
would have as few bowel movements as possible.
With this approach, the pain was indeed greatly
reduced. Follow-up visits included the extraction
of a staple from her rectum. However, after 3
months, when she had resumed a normal diet, the
severe pain returned. Over a year has passed and
the patient is still suffering from proctalgia—all of
this the result of an improperly treated anal fissure.
Nonetheless, STARR is not useless for treating
anal fissures. In Correspondence recently published
in the British Journal of Surgery, German authors
reported the healing of a concomitant anal fissure
in some patients who underwent STARR for
obstructed defecation linked to other causes. The
patients probably had anal hypertonia that was corrected by dilatation with the 36-mm circular anal

1.8 An Unforgettable Complication
Fig. 1.8 STARR was performed in this patient with anal fissure,
to treat a rectal internal mucosal prolapse. This resulted in rectal suture dehiscence (top) followed by a stricture stenosis, a
rectal diverticulum, and fistula (black, bottom left). After a
course of home parenteral nutrition, the wounds healed but the
patient still suffers from severe chronic proctalgia despite
removal of the staples
11
Fig. 1.9 a This patient, in the Sims position, was treated for a
recurrence of a rectal internal mucosal prolapse
Fig. 1.9 b Sagittal magnetic resonance imaging. The patient
had severe proctalgia and had undergone a STARR procedure
one year earlier. In the high portion of the rectovaginal septum,
a round area of activity indicates abscess or inflammation
(large arrow). Small arrow: sacrococcyx
Fig. 1.9 c Transanal ultrasonography with a rotating probe in a
patient in the Sims position. Anteriorly (arrow), just above the
puborectalis muscle, the hyperechogeneic area indicates the
retained staples and postoperative fibrosis. During rectal exploration, the patient had pain in this area

12
1 Anal Fissure
dilator (CAD), as if a mini anal stretch had been
performed. In any case, however, treating an anal
fissure with STARR is like using a Kalashnikov to
kill a mosquito that is buzzing around your house:
the insect will be eliminated, but a big hole will be
left in the wall. That is what happened to the patient
above. The rectal wall gave way, due to the trauma
caused by the surgery, and the result was a dehiscence followed by a fistula and diverticulum. The
cure was worse than the disease.
Just as the patient’s ill health has continued so
does her law suit against the first surgeon, whom
she is suing for a rather large amount in damages.
Since offense is the best form of defense, this surgeon has blamed me for the patient’s problems.
The case has yet to be decided.
Summary
Local sepsis and hemorrhage are rare after surgery
for anal fissure. The most common complication is
incontinence, usually gas and mucus incontinence,
but it is seldom either severe or permanent, except
after anal divulsion. It is advisable to avoid internal
sphincterotomy unless the patient has anal hypertonia, and to perform only a limited sphincterotomy if
the patient has hypertonia and deficient sphincters.
Elderly or multiparous women as well as individuals
suffering from diarrhea are high-risk patients.
Fissurectomy with injections of Botox and simple laying-open of the fissure are the two procedures associated with the least risk of incontinence.
Delayed wound healing and anal sepsis can
occur, especially in patients with diabetes or
Crohn’s disease, and in those who undergo fissure
excision and anoplasty. Suture dehiscence can be a
complication of the latter procedure.
Suggested Readings
Abcarian H (1980) Surgical correction of chronic anal fissure: re-
sults of lateral internal sphincterotomy vs. fissurectomy-
midline sphincterotomy. Dis Colon Rectum 23:31-36
Aigner F, Conrad F (2008) Fissurectomy for treatment of chron-
ic anal fissures. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1163
Algaithy ZK (2008) Botulinum toxin versus surgical sphinctero-
tomy in females with chronic anal fissure. Saudi Med J
29:1260-1263
Altomare DF, Rinaldi M, Troilo VL et al (2005) Closed ambula-
tory lateral internal sphincterotomy for chronic anal fissures.
Tech Coloproctol 9:248-249
Altomare DF, Binda GA, Canuti S et al (2011) The management
of patients with primary chronic anal fissure: a position paper. Tech Coloproctol 15 (in press)
Argov S, Levandovsky O (2000) Open lateral sphincterotomy is
still the best treatment for chronic anal fissure. Am J Surg.
179:201-202
Arroyo A, Pérez F, Serrano P et al (2004) Open versus closed lat-
eral sphincterotomy performed as an outpatient procedure under local anesthesia for chronic anal fissure: prospective randomized study of clinical and manometric long term results.
J Am Coll Surg 199:361-367
Arthur JD, Makin CA, El-Sayed TY et al (2008) A pilot com-
parative study of fissurectomy/diltiazem and fissurectomy/botulinum toxin in the treatment of chronic anal fissure.
Tech Coloproctol 12:331-336
Badejo OA (1984) Outpatient treatment of fissure-in-ano. Trop
Geogr Med 36:367-369
Baraza W, Boereboom C, Shorthouse A et al (2008) The long-term
efficacy of fissurectomy and botulinum toxin injection for
chronic anal fissure in females. Dis Colon Rectum 51:239-243
Boccasanta P, Venturi M, Stuto A et al (2004) Stapled transanal
rectal resection for outlet obstruction: a prospective, multicenter trial. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1285-1296
Boschetto S, Giovannone M, Tosoni M et al (2004) Hydropneu-
matic anal dilation in conservative treatment of chronic anal
fissure: clinical outcomes and randomized comparison with
topical nitroglycerin. Tech Coloproctol 8:89-92
Brisinda G, Cadeddu F, Mazzeo P et al (2007) Botulinum toxin
A for the treatment of chronic anal fissure. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 1:219-228
Brown CJ, Dubreuil D, Santoro L et al (2007) Lateral internal
sphincterotomy is superior to topical nitroglycerin for healing chronic anal fissure and does not compromise long-term
fecal continence: six-year follow-up of a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 50:442-448
Cerdán FJ, Ruiz de León A, Azpiroz F et al (1982) Anal sphinc-
teric pressure in fissure-in-ano before and after lateral internal sphincterotomy. Dis Colon Rectum 25:198-201
Chambers W, Sajal R, Dixon A (2010) V-Y advancement flap as
first-line treatment for all chronic anal fissures. Int J Colorectal Dis 25:645-648
Cho DY (2005) Controlled lateral sphincterotomy for chronic anal
fissure. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1037-1041
Collins EE, Lund JN (2007) A review of chronic anal fissure man-
agement. Tech Coloproctol 11:209-223
Conaghan P, Farouk R (2010) Anal fissure healing and sphinc-
ter preservation can be successfully achieved in most patients
with chronic anal fissure. ASCRS Meeting Abstracts, Dis
Colon Rectum 53:587
Cundall JD, Gardiner A, Laden G et al (2003) Use of hyperbar-
ic oxygen to treat chronic anal fissure. Br J Surg 90:452–453
Elsebae MM (2007) A study of fecal incontinence in patients with
chronic anal fissure: prospective, randomized, controlled trial of the extent of internal anal sphincter division during lateral sphincterotomy. World J Surg 31:2052-2057
Farouk R, Monson JR, Duthie GS (1997) Technical failure of lat-
eral sphincterotomy for the treatment of chronic anal fissure:
a study using endoanal ultrasonography. Br J Surg 84:84-85

Suggested Readings
13
Favetta U, Amato A, Interisano A et al (1996) Clinical, mano-
metric and sonographic assessment of the anal sphincters. A
comparative prospective study. Int J Colorectal Dis 11:163-
166
Favetta U, Amato A, Interisano A et al (1994) Comparative eval-
uation of anal resting tone and sphincter relaxation by means
of digital exploration, anorectal manometry and anal ultra-
sound. Tech Coloproctol 3:14-15
Filingeri V, Gravante G (2005) A prospective randomized trial
betwen subcutaneous lateral internal sphincterotomy with ra-
diofrequency bistoury and conventional Parks’ operation in
the treatment of anal fissures. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci
9:175-178
Garcea G, Sutton C, Mansoori S et al (2003) Results following
conservative lateral sphincteromy for the treatment of chron-
ic anal fissures. Colorectal Dis 5:311-314
García-Granero E, Sanahuja A, García-Botello SA et al (2009)
The ideal lateral internal sphincterotomy: clinical and en-
dosonographic evaluation following open and closed inter-
nal anal sphincterotomy. Colorectal Dis 11:502-7
Giordano P, Gravante G, Grondona P et al (2009) Simple cuta-
neous advancement flap anoplasty for resistant chronic anal
fissure: a prospective study. World J Surg 33:1058-1063
Goligher JC (1965) An evaluation of internal sphicterotomy and
simple sphincter-stretching in the treatment of fissure-in-
ano. Surg Clin North Am 45:1299-1304
Gupta PJ (2005) A study of suppurative pathologies associated
with chronic anal fissures. Tech Coloproctol 9:104-107
Gupta PJ, Kalaskar S (2003) Removal of hypertrophied anal
papillae and fibrous anal polyp increases patient satisfaction
after anal fissure surgery. Tech Coloproctol 155-158
Hancke E, Rikas E, Suchan K et al (2010) Dermal flap coverage
for chronic anal fissure: lower incidence of anal inconti-
nence compared to lateral internal sphincterotomy after long-
term follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum 53:1563-1568
Herold A, Lehur PA, Matzel KE, O’Connell PR (2008) Coloproc-
tology (series: European Manual of Medicine). Springer, pp
45-51
Jensen SL, Lund F, Nielsen OV et al (1984) Lateral subcutaneous
sphincterotomy versus anal dilatation in the treatment of fis-
sure in ano in outpatients: a prospective randomised study.
Br Med J 289:528-530
Kang GS, Kim BS, Choi PS et al (2008) Evaluation of healing
and complications after lateral internal sphincterotomy for
chronic anal fissure: marginal suture of incision vs. open left
incision: prospective, randomized, controlled study. Dis
Colon Rectum 51:329-333
Katsinelos P, Papaziogas B, Koutelidakis I et al (2006) Topical
0.5% nifedipine vs. lateral internal sphincterotomy for the
treatment of chronic anal fissure: long-term follow-up. Int J
Colorectal Dis 21:179-183
Khubchandani IT, Reed JF (1989) Sequelae of internal sphinc-
terotomy for chronic fissure in ano. Br J Surg 76:431-434
Kiyak G, Korukluogˇlu B, Kuşdemir A et al (2009) Results of lat-
eral internal sphincterotomy with open technique for chron-
ic anal fissure: evaluation of complications, symptom relief,
and incontinence with long-term follow-up. Dig Dis Sci
54:2220-2224
Leong A (2005) Internal sphincterotomy versus rotation flap to
treat chronic anal fissures. Asian J Surg 28:192
Leong AF, Seow-Choen F (1995) Lateral sphincterotomy com-
pared with anal advancement flap for chronic anal fissure. Dis
Colon Rectum 38:69-71
Libertiny G, Knight JS, Farouk R (2002) Randomised trial of top-
ical 0.2% glyceryl trinitrate and lateral internal sphincterotomy for the treatment of patients with chronic anal fissure:
long-term follow-up. Eur J Surg 168:418-421
Liratzopoulos N, Efremidou EI, Papageorgiou MS et al (2006)
Lateral subcutaneous internal sphincterotomy in the treatment
of chronic anal fissure: our experience. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis 15:143-147
Lolli P, Malleo G, Rigotti G (2010) Treatment of chronic anal fis-
sures and associated stenosis by autologous adipose tissue
transplant: a pilot study. Dis Colon Rectum 53:460-466
Lubowski D (2008) Topical therapy is first line treatment for
chronic anal fissure because of the risk of incontinence with
sphincterotomy. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1157-1158
Lysy J, Israeli E, Levy S et al (2006) Long-term results of “chem-
ical sphincterotomy” for chronic anal fissure: a prospective
study. Dis Colon Rectum 49:858-864
Maturanza M, Maritato F, Costanzo A et al (1997) Combined out-
patient surgical-cryotherapeutic treatment of anal fissures. Our
experience. Minerva Chir 52:393-395
McMurrick P, Polglase A, Binns K et al (2010) Prospective Com-
parison Of Sphincterotomy Vs Botox Injection For Anal
Fissure. ASCRS Meeting Abstracts, Dis Colon Rectum
53:588
Menteş BB, Ege B, Leventoglu S et al (2005) Extent of lateral
internal sphincterotomy: up to the dentate line or up to the
fissure apex? Dis Colon Rectum 48:365-370
Menteş BB, Güner MK, Leventoglu S et al (2008) Fine-tuning
of the extent of lateral internal sphincterotomy: spasm-controlled vs. up to the fissure apex. Dis Colon Rectum 51:128133
Menteş BB, Irkörücü O, Akin M et al (2003) Comparison of bot-
ulinum toxin injection and lateral internal sphincterotomy for
the treatment of chronic anal fissure. Dis Colon Rectum
46:232-237
Menteş BB, Tezcaner T, Yilmaz U et al (2006) Results of later-
al internal sphincterotomy for chronic anal fissure with particular reference to quality of life. Dis Colon Rectum 49:10451051
Miliacca C, Gagliardi G, Pescatori M (2010) The ‘Draw-the-Fam-
ily Test’ in the preoperative assessment of patients with
anorectal diseases and psychological distress: a prospective
controlled study. Colorectal Dis 12:792-798
Mishra R, Thomas S, Maan MS et al (2005) Topical nitroglyc-
erin versus lateral internal sphincterotomy for chronic anal
fissure: prospective, randomized trial. ANZ J Surg 75:10321035
Mousavi SR, Sharifi M, Mehdikhah Z (2009) A comparison be-
tween the results of fissurectomy and lateral internal sphincterotomy in the surgical management of chronic anal fissure.
J Gastrointest Surg 13:1279-1282
Nelson R (2005) Operative procedures for fissure in ano. Cochrane
Database Syst Rev 18:CD002199
Orsay C, Rakinic J, Perry WB et al (2004) Practice parameters
for the management of anal fissures (revised). Dis Colon Rectum 47:2003-2007
Ortiz H, Marzo J, Armendariz P et al (2005) Quality of life as-
sessment in patients with chronic anal fissure after lateral internal sphincterotomy. Br J Surg. 92:881-885

14
1 Anal fissure
Pascual M, Parés D, Pera M et al (2008) Variation in clinical,
manometric and endosonographic findings in anterior chron-
ic anal fissure: a prospective study. Dig Dis Sci 53:21-26
Patti R, Famà F, Barrera T et al (2010) Fissurectomy and anal ad-
vancement flap for anterior chronic anal fissure without hy-
pertonia of the internal anal sphincter in females. Colorec-
tal Dis 12:1127-1130
Pelta AE, Davis KG, Armstrong DN (2007) Subcutaneous fis-
surotomy: a novel procedure for chronic fissure-in-ano. a re-
view of 109 cases. Dis Colon Rectum 50:1662-1667
Pérez-Miranda M, Robledo P, Alcalde M et al (1996) Endoscop-
ic anal dilatation for fissure-in-ano: a new outpatient treat-
ment modality. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 88:265-272
Pernikoff BJ, Eisenstat TE, Rubin RJ et al (1994) Reappraisal of
partial lateral internal sphincterotomy. Dis Colon Rectum
37:1291-1295
Pescatori M, Ayabaca SM, Cafaro D (2002) Tailored sphinc-
terotomy or fissurectomy and anoplasty? Dis Colon Rectum
45:1563-1564; author reply 1564
Pescatori M, Interisano A, Basso L et al (1995) Management of
perianal Crohn’s disease. Results of a multicenter study in
Italy. Dis Colon Rectum 38:121-124
Pescatori M, Maria G, Anastasio G (1991) “Spasm related” in-
ternal sphincterotomy in the treatment of anal fissure. Colo-
proctology 13:20-22
Pescatori M, Mattana C (2008) Fissures. In: Coloproctology,
Herold A, Lehur P-A, Matzel KE, O’Connell PR Eds; pp 45-
51
Poisson J (1997) Anal fissure. Can J Surg 20:417-421
Ram E, Alper D, Stein GY et al (2005) Internal anal sphincter func-
tion following lateral internal sphincterotomy for anal fissure:
a long-term manometric study. Ann Surg 242:208-211
Renzi A, Brusciano L, Pescatori M et al (2005) Pneumatic bal-
loon dilatation for chronic anal fissure: a prospective, clini-
cal, endosonographic, and manometric study. Dis Colon
Rectum 48:121-126
Renzi A, Izzo D, Di Sarno G et al (2008) Clinical, manometric,
and ultrasonographic results of pneumatic balloon dilata-
tion vs. lateral internal sphincterotomy for chronic anal fis-
sure: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Dis Colon
Rectum 51:121-127
Rosa G, Lolli P, Piccinelli D et al (2005) Calibrated lateral inter-
nal sphincterotomy for chronic anal fissure. Tech Coloproctol. 9:127-131; discussion 31-32
Saad AM, Omer A (1992) Surgical treatment of chronic fissure
in ano: a prospective randomized study. East Afr Med J
69:613-615
Sajid MS, Vijaynagar B, Desai M et al (2008) Botulinum tox-
in vs glyceryltrinitrate for the medical management of
chronic anal fissure: a meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis 10:541546
Simkovic D, Smejkal K, Hladík P (2000) Assessment of sphinc-
terotomy results in patients treated for anal fissure. Rev Esp
Enferm Dig 92:399-404
Speakman CT, Burnett SJ, Kamm MA et al (1991) Sphincter in-
jury after anal dilatation demonstrated by anal endosonography. Br J Surg 78:1429-1430
Srinivasaiah N, Laden G, Duthie GS et al (2008) The long-term
efficacy of fissurectomy and botulinum toxin injection for
chronic anal fissure in females. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1589
Usatoff V, Polglase AL (1995) The longer term results of inter-
nal anal sphincterotomy for anal fissure. Aust N Z J Surg
65:576-578
Vafai M, Mann CV (1981) Closed lateral internal anal sphinctero-
tomy without removal of sentinel pile for fissure-in-ano.
Coloproctology 3:91-93
Walfisch S, Silberstein E (1998) Balloon anal dilatation for anal
fissure. Tech Coloproctol 2:73–75
Wiley M, Day P, Rieger N et al (2004) Open vs. closed lateral
internal sphincterotomy for idiopathic fissure-in-ano: a
prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum
47:847-852
Yakovlev A, Karasev SA, Dolgich OY (2011) Sacral nerve stim-
ulation: a novel treatment of chronic anal fissure. Dis Colon
Rectum 54:324-327
Yucel T, Gonullu D, Oncu M et al (2009) Comparison of con-
trolled-intermittent anal dilatation and lateral internal sphincterotomy in the treatment of chronic anal fissures: a prospective, randomized study. Int J Surg 7:228-231
Zbar AP, Pescatori M (2004) Functional outcome following lat-
eral internal anal sphincterotomy for chronic anal fissure. Colorectal Dis 6:210-211

Hemorrhoids
2.1 Introduction
Although only a limited number of surgical procedures to treat anal fissure have been described in
the literature, many surgical procedures are available to treat hemorrhoids. We know that there are
also many possible complications of hemorrhoid
surgery. Early complications include hemorrhage;
somewhat later there may be abscess formation,
and over the long-term incontinence (Hall and
Goldberg, 2003).
I think it is best to first cover the most commonly
performed operations. According to the Annual
Report of the Italian Society of Colo-Rectal Surgery
(Società Italiana di Chirurgia Colo-Rettale, SICCR),
published in Techniques in Coloproctology by
Occelli and Bruni, there are two well-established
methods (the Milligan-Morgan and the Ferguson procedures), one that is gaining in importance (transanal
hemorrhoidal dearterialization/Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation, THD/DGHAL), and another that is becoming slightly less popular (the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids, PPH). The complications associated with the two well-established
procedures and with THD are on the whole wellknown, whereas PPH/stapled hemorrhoidopexy can
cause unusual problems that are sometimes severe
and are therefore discussed here separately.
In comparing the problem of fissure with that
of hemorrhoids, surgeons (especially in Italy) tend
to forget one thing that the two conditions have in
common: only rarely is surgical treatment necessary, perhaps in only one out of ten cases if not
even less often. And clearly, the more we operate,
the greater the risk of complications.
In this chapter, instead of making a list of complications and commenting on them, as in the pre-
2
vious chapter, we discuss their prevention and/or
their causes during surgery. For practical purposes,
we shall start with the latter.
2.2 Surgical Complications After Manual Hemorrhoidectomy (Ferguson and Milligan-Morgan Procedures): Live from the Operating Room
Let’s imagine we are at the operating table, faced
with a case that is not simple: a 60-year-old multiparous woman with fourth-degree hemorrhoids,
(i.e., irreducible ones) that have an external fibrotic component (Fig. 2.1). We have decided to perform a hemorrhoidectomy, which, as shown by
various meta-analyses, is the most radical operation in a proctologist’s repertoire.
Fig. 2.1 Hemorrhoids with fibrotic external tissue
M. Pescatori, Prevention and Treatment of Complications in Proctological Surgery,
© Springer-Verlag Italia 2012
15

16
Before proceeding, it is necessary to insert one
comment about preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis.
While some excellent surgeons do not use it, it is
definitely necessary in cardiopathic and immuno depressed patients. Cases of Fournier’s gangrene
after hemorrhoidectomy have been reported.
Although very rare, this complication can lead to
abdominoperineal resection of the rectum.
Assume that we are performing a Ferguson procedure not only because that is what I do most
often, but also because Jóhansson and Påhlman
(2006) reported that continence is better after a
Ferguson than after a Milligan-Morgan procedure,
and our patient already has deficient anal sphincters.
Does the patient’s position have an effect on the
complication rate? The only difference is that if
the patient is in the jack-knife position the hemorrhoids are usually “deflated” such that no blood
runs into the operative field, which simplifies the
work of the surgeon and the surgical team.
Before the operation begins, we must consider
the preparation by the anesthetist. The patient is
awake, which means that she has been given spinal
anesthesia, placing her at greater risk of urinary
retention after surgery. We therefore caution the
anesthetist not to give the patient large volumes of
intravenous fluids. (If the patient was an elderly
man with prostate problems it would be essential
that he receive minimal fluids). The first surgical
move that we make is one that can easily cause
damage, i.e., insertion of the anal retractor (as this
is a Ferguson procedure and assessing the rectum is
never a bad idea), since we know that the patient
has weak sphincters due to her age and multiple
deliveries. To avoid stretching the muscle fibers and
thereby damage the continence mechanism, it is
best to use an instrument that does not overly dilate
and is not too wide (< 32 mm), such as a Fansler,
Ferguson, or Sapimed Beak dilator (Fig. 2.2). Some
surgeons prefer the 36-mm circular anal dilator
(CAD) used on PPH. It should be noted that even if
the patient were a young male with a narrow anus,
we could damage (lacerate) the sphincter by the
excessively energetic insertion of a large retractor.
It is therefore essential that we choose the right
instrument and perform the maneuver delicately. If
a Milligan-Morgan procedure is being performed,
an anal retractor is not needed.
2 Hemorrhoids
Fig. 2.2 Ferguson’s hemorrhoidectomy with the patient in the
lithotomy position. The anal retractor used to prevent sphincter
trauma should not be too large. A Beak dilator (Sapimed) was
used in this case
We now make the surgical incision. If the
patient is in the lithotomy position, we do not start
at the anterior hemorrhoid as this will cause blood
to fill the operative field. The incision, especially
in the Ferguson procedure, should be sufficiently
long and in a narrow V-shape, extending to the
perianal skin; otherwise, after suturing, there will
be unaesthetic “dog’s ears,” which will result in
painful swelling. A cold scalpel is used to avoid
skin burns, which could facilitate suture dehiscence and cause pain.
Next we identify the internal sphincter (obviously this is also done in the Milligan-Morgan procedure), so that we can avoid injury to it during
excision of the hemorrhoidal nodules. Note: Some
surgeons, when performing the Ferguson procedure, place a Kelly under the hemorrhoid and cut
the tissue from above. While this is a quick method
that prevents bleeding, I do not use it because it
does not provide a good view of the internal
sphincter proper. In fact, with the Kelly one might
even inadvertently pinch the sphincter.
We are now ready to excise the nodules. This
may be done with scissors, a cold scalpel or electrocautery, Ultracision (the ultrasonic scalpel), a
laser (infrequently used now), or radiowaves.
If we are performing a Milligan-Morgan and not
a Ferguson procedure, LigaSure could certainly be

2.2 Surgical Complications After Manual Hemorrhoidectomy (Ferguson and Milligan-Morgan Procedures)
used. In fact, a Milligan-Morgan with LigaSure
appears to be associated with fewer postoperative
problems. In a review published in Colorectal
Disease in 2010, Milito et al. evaluated randomized
prospective trials (including SICCR: LigaSure vs.
traditional Milligan-Morgan, Ferguson, and PPH).
The results regarding postoperative complications
after using LigaSure were: less pain than after traditional hemorrhoidectomy and the same level of
patient satisfaction as after PPH. In particular, a trial
of PPH vs. LigaSure demonstrated that postoperative
pain is the same after these two procedures (Kraemer
et al., 2005). However, it should be noted that with
LigaSure the hemorrhoids are removed, so that the
procedure is more radical than stapled hemorrhoidopexy. LigaSure is not associated with a lower
risk of bleeding – there is no statistically significant
difference between the procedures – nor is it associated with a faster, uneventful recovery.
The comparison made by Fareed et al. (2009)
between LigaSure and Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy
showed that LigaSure is associated with fewer postoperative pain and less problematic recovery. The compli cations that occur after Ligasure are listed in Table 2.1.
Fig. 2.3 Ferguson’s hemorrhoidectomy with the patient in the
lithotomy position. Hemorrhoid excision can be extended a few
centimeters upward if there is a concomitant rectal internal
mucosal prolapse. A report by Gaj and Trecca (2005), based on
a study carried out at the Italian coloproctology units, showed
that a concomitant rectal internal muocosal prolapse is present
in about one-third of hemorrhoid patients. To reduce the risk of
postoperative anal incontinence, the internal sphincter should
be identified to avoid its damage, as shown in the figure
Continuing our operation: During dissection of
the hemorrhoids there will be bleeding, especially
if scissors are used or a cold scalpel. Since the less
blood the better, we could proceed slowly and
coagulate the hemorrhoidal plexus as we go. I use
a maneuver (described in “Tricks of the Trade”,
below) to reduce intraoperative bleeding which
seems to work well and was also mentioned in the
chapter on anal fissure. With the tip of a pair of
forceps, I touch the tissue, as is done using an electrocautery device, to excise the pile. At the same
time, the instruments nurse touches the other end
of the forceps with the electric scalpel.
Obviously, in a Ferguson procedure it is less
essential at this phase to obtain hemostasis because
one can count on the suture – in part, a hemostatic
suture – that will later close the surgical wound.
However, it is still important to avoid cutting the
underlying fibers of the internal sphincter or else
postoperatively there may be soiling (Fig. 2.3).
Now we reach the apex of the hemorrhoid. If
there is no prolapse of the internal mucosa of the
rectum we can stop here; otherwise it is necessary
to extend the dissection upwards for 1-3 cm (Fig.
2.4). Should the hemorrhoidal peduncle be ligated? Consider that a peduncle is not always present.
If one performs a Milligan-Morgan procedure with
diathermy using the technique of Lentini or
Phillips (2009), coagulation is sufficient. If a traditional Milligan-Morgan or Ferguson procedure is
17
Table 2.1 Percentage of complications in various case series after hemorrhoidectomy with LigaSure
Luo, 2010 Wang, 2006 Kraemer, 2005 Chung, 2003
Colorect Dis World J Surg Dis Colon Rectum Dis Colon Rectum
n = 207 n = 42 n = 25 n = 30
Urinary retention 0 2 1 1
Severe rectal bleeding 6 1 1 1
Anal stenosis 0 2 - -
Severe constipation 0 3 - -
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
