Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_1137_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Foreword
- •Preface
- •Acknowledgements
- •1 Anal Fissure
- •1.1 Introduction
- •1.3 Anal Incontinence
- •1.4 What Should Be Done if Incontinence Develops?
- •1.5 Anal Sepsis
- •1.7 Tricks of the Trade
- •1.8 An Unforgettable Complication
- •Summary
- •Suggested Readings
- •2 Hemorrhoids
- •2.1 Introduction
- •2.2 Surgical Complications After Manual Hemorrhoidectomy (Ferguson and Milligan-Morgan Procedures): Live from the Operating Room
- •1.6 Suture Dehiscence
- •2.3 THD/DGHAL and Mucopexy (Doppler-guided, Laser-assisted)
- •2.4 Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy (PPH)
- •2.4.1 Hemorrhage
- •2.4.2 Other Complications
- •2.4.6 Rectal Inclusion Cysts
- •2.4.7 Total Obliteration of the Rectal Lumen
- •2.4.8 Rectal Diverticulum or Rectal Pocket Syndrome
- •2.4.9 Rectovaginal Fistulae
- •2.4.11 Dysplasia and Cancer
- •2.4.12 Retro-rectal Hematoma
- •2.4.13 Hemoperitoneum
- •2.4.15 Rectal Perforation and Pelvic Sepsis
- •2.4.16 Thrombosis of the Inferior Vena Cava
- •2.5 Complications After Other Operations
- •2.5.1 Semi-open or Semi-closed Hemorrhoidectomy
- •2.5.2 Farag Suturing of Internal Hemorrhoids
- •2.5.3 Hussein’s Manual Hemorrhoidopexy
- •2.5.5 Parks’ Submucosal Hemorrhoidectomy
- •2.5.6 Coagulation of Hemorrhoids
- •2.6 Treating the Complications
- •2.6.1 Pain
- •2.6.2 Urinary Retention
- •2.6.3 Hemorrhage
- •2.6.4 Fecaloma
- •2.6.5 Thrombosed External Hemorrhoids
- •2.6.6 Anal or Rectal Stenosis
- •2.6.7 Anal Fissure
- •2.6.8 Abscess or Fistula
- •2.6.9 Skin Tags
- •2.6.10 Anal Incontinence
- •2.6.11 Severe Anal Sepsis
- •2.6.12 Fournier’s Gangrene
- •2.6.13 Unusual Complications after PPH
- •2.7 Tricks of the Trade
- •2.8 Two Unforgettable Complications
- •2.8.1 Case Number One
- •2.8.2 Case Number Two
- •Summary
- •Suggested Readings
- •3 Anal Abscesses and Fistulae
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.2 Postoperative Bleeding
- •3.3 Iatrogenic Fistula
- •3.6 The Prevention of Postoperative Anal Incontinence
- •3.7 The Management of Postoperative Anal Incontinence
- •3.9 Tricks of the Trade
- •3.10 An Unforgettable Complication
- •Summary
- •Suggested Readings
- •4 Rectovaginal Fistulae
- •4.1 Introduction
- •4.2 Types of Operations and Postoperative Complications
- •4.3 Bleeding and Dyspareunia
- •4.3.1 Bleeding
- •4.3.2 Dyspareunia
- •4.4 Local Sepsis and Suture Dehiscence
- •4.5 Re-interventions
- •4.6 Drains
- •4.7 Fecal Incontinence
- •4.8 An Unforgettable Complication
- •Summary
- •Suggested Readings
- •5 Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal Sinus
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.2 Types of Operations
- •5.3 Postoperative Bleeding
- •5.4 Local Sepsis and Suture Dehiscence
- •5.5 The Prevention of Local Sepsis
- •5.7 Sinus Pilonidalis Associated with Anal Fistula or Abscess
- •5.8 An Unforgettable Complication
- •Summary
- •Suggested Readings
- •6.7 Two Unforgettable Complications
- •6.7.1 Case Number One
- •6.7.2 Case Number Two
- •Summary
- •Suggested Readings
- •6 Tumors of the Rectum and Anus
- •6.1 Introduction
- •6.2 TEM or Transanal Endoscopic Mucosectomy
- •6.3 Transanal Submucosal Excision According to Parks: “Live Surgery”
- •6.4 Other Transanal Techniques
- •6.4.1 Through the Rigid Sigmoidoscope
- •6.4.2 Using an endoGIA or a Urologic Resectoscope
- •6.5 Non-transanal Local Excision
- •6.5.1 The York-Mason Procedure
- •6.5.2 Kraske Operation
- •6.5.3 Intersphincteric Resection
- •7 Anal Condylomata and Anorectal Stricture
- •7.1 Introduction
- •7.2 Complications After Surgery for Anal Condylomata
- •7.4 Complications After Surgery for Rectal Stricture
- •7.5 “Live Surgery”: The Prevention of Postoperative Complications After Anoplasty
- •7.6 A Trick of the Trade
- •7.7 An Unforgettable Complication
- •Summary
- •Suggested Readings
- •8 Obstructed Defecation (OD) and Related Diseases
- •8.1 Introduction
- •8.2 Our Relevant Complications Following Surgery for Obstructed Defecation
- •8.3 Postoperative Complications After Internal Delorme
- •8.5 The Prevention of Postoperative Incontinence
- •8.6 The Treatment of Postoperative Incontinence
- •8.7 Postoperative Complications After STARR and Transtar
- •8.8 Other Operations for Rectocele Using a Transanal Stapler
- •8.8.1 Circular Stapler
- •8.8.2 Linear Stapler
- •8.9 Postoperative Complications After Rectocele Repair Using Prosthetic Meshes
- •8.11 Operating on a Patient with Solitary Rectal Ulcer Syndrome (SRUS) and Obstructed Defecation
- •8.12 Two Unforgettable Complications
- •8.12.1 Case Number One
- •8.12.2 Case Number Two
- •Summary
- •Suggested Readings
- •9 Fecal Incontinence
- •9.1 Introduction
- •9.3 Anterior Levatorplasty
- •9.4 Sphincter Reconstruction
- •9.5 Sacral Neuromodulation
- •9.5.1 Radiofrequency Energy
- •9.6.1 Graciloplasty
- •9.6.2 Gluteoplasty
- •9.7 Artificial Sphincter
- •9.8 Bulking Agents
- •9.9 Puborectalis Sling and Silicone Ring
- •9.9.1 Puborectalis Sling
- •9.9.2 Silicone Ring
- •9.10 Trick of the Trade
- •9.11 Unforgettable Complications
- •9.11.1 The First Five
- •9.11.2 The Last One
- •Summary
- •Suggested Readings
- •10 External Rectal Prolapse
- •10.1 Introduction
- •10.4 Complications After the Altemeier Procedure (Perineal Proctosigmoidectomy)
- •10.5 Complications After Other Procedures
- •10.5.2 Transvaginal Sacrospinous Rectopexy
- •10.5.3 Manual Transanal Rectal Prolapse Excision
- •10.6 Circular Stapled Transanal Prolapsectomy
- •10.7 Transanal Rectal Prolapsectomy Using the Contour Stapling Device
- •10.9 An Unforgettable Complication
- •Summary
- •Suggested Readings
- •Subject Index

190
10 External Rectal Prolapse
Fig. 10.3 Altemeier’s
proctosigmoidectomy
diagram. Left:
Opening of the pouch
of Dou glas and plasty
for concomitant elytrocele (enterocele).
Right: po sterior levatorplasty reduces the
risk of prolapse recurrence
of this complication is reduced by using a stapling
device. However, Attuwaybi et al. (2010) reported
less blood loss with the harmonic scalpel than
with the stapler. Overall, the mean intraoperative
blood loss was 48 ml. The operative time with stapled anastomosis was significantly shorter than
with manual suture.
Recurrence and incontinence rates are reduced
when a levatorplasty is associated with the proctosigmoidectomy (Chun et al. 2004) (Fig 10.3).
Both anterior and posterior levatorplasty might
cause rectal stricture and obstructed defecation.
My suggestion is to modulate the tension of the
levatorplasty by inserting a finger in the anorectum when tying the knots of the plasty sutures,
prior to performing the colo-anal anastomosis.
A postoperative deterioration in continence
can occur for several reasons. First of all, the rectum is removed. Therefore, there is no longer a
reservoir for storage of the feces and to delay
evacuation, normally mediated by the accommodation reflex, which is based on the intrinsic
innervation of the rectum. As is the case after
anterior resection of the rectum, over time, the
sigmoid partly assumes some rectal functions,
among them reservoir capacity by means of a progressive dilation, and absorption by means of an
anatomical modification of the epithelium, including flattening of the villi. A colonic reservoir may
be constructed and sutured above the anal canal at
the end of the operation, as described by Williams
and Keighley in their book, “Surgery of the colon,
rectum and anus.” This will improve continence
and bowel frequency by providing for the storage
of stool and by slowing colonic propulsion in the
early postoperative months. Moreover, the patient
who undergoes a perineal proctosigmoidectomy,
e.g., an elderly multiparous female, is typically
more likely to have weak sphincters and deficient
sensation, with perineal descent and pudendal
neuropathy. Finally, the anal sphincters are likely
to be stretched during the surgical maneuvers and
the stool tends to become more liquid after resection of the distal large bowel, with a partial reduction of the segmental motility of the sigmoid,
whose functions include slowing the transit of the
fecal stream. Some of the above-mentioned
anatomical and physiological changes may be
partly corrected by surgical maneuvers such as
avoiding sphincter stretch and constructing a
reservoir, whereas others cannot be prevented at
all. Therefore, the operation is potentially harmful
with respect to anal continence. However, in 30%
of our patients continence improved after the
Altemeier procedure, as the removal of the prolapsed rectum favors restoration of the recto-anal
inhibitory reflex, which may be impaired by the
presence of bulk, in turn causing soiling by permanently stimulating the relaxation of the internal
sphincter.

10.5 Complications After Other Procedures
191
According to a study by Wexner’s group, combined Altemeier and levatorplasty carries less risk
of postoperative incontinence than either Delorme
or Altemeier alone (Agachan et al., 1997). In
another study, out of the ten incontinent patients
who had a Delorme, none became fully continent,
but four improved (Lauretta et al., 2010). Use of
the Lone Star retractor may well help to avoid
sphincter trauma, but the device cannot be used
when dealing with rectal neoplasms, as lacerations of the anal canal, which are likely to occur
due to the sharp hooks of the retractor, may favor
the local implantation of malignant cells.
In conclusion, the Altemeier procedure is still
a valid option, as the recurrence rate of 3-19% is
acceptable (Kim et al., 2010; Altomare et al.,
2009), and the complication rate, as reported by
many series, is not higher than 20%. There were
only three deaths among a total of 732 cases
(Table 10.4), with a mortality of 0.4%, even if
many patients were elderly and fragile. That is
why Cirocco (2010) justly defined the Altemeier
as “an operation for all ages.”
10.5 Complications After Other
Procedures
10.5.1 Transperineal Rectopexy with the
Prosthesis Fixed to the Sacrum and
Posterior Levatorplasty
Kosba et al. (2010) reported the results achieved in
32 patients using a T-shaped polypropylene mesh.
They had just three cases (9.3%) of superficial sepsis, all successfully treated with antibiotics. None of
the male patients had sexual problems, whereas
sacral rectopexy may cause a loss of ejaculation following injury of the hypogastric nerves. None of the
patients had new-onset fecal incontinence, as may
occur following the Delorme and Altemeier procedures since both affect or remove the rectal reservoir. Despite the rectopexy, in 80% of the patients
operated upon by Kosba et al. constipation was
improved, possibly because no sharp angle between
the rectum and the sigmoid was created by a procedure that does not extend upward in the pelvis, and
because the rectal lateral ligaments were not divided and rectal sensitivity was not impaired.
10.5.2 Transvaginal Sacrospinous Rectopexy
Gurland et al. (2010), through a vertical incision of
the posterior vaginal wall, anchored the rectum to
the sacrospinous ligament, bilaterally, using a
Surgisis mesh. Among the seven patients who
underwent a Delorme operation together with an
associated urological procedure, three had complications: severe intraoperative bleeding, dynamic
ileus, and urinary sepsis.
10.5.3 Manual Transanal Rectal Prolapse Excision
Beginning in the late 1970s, many patients at St
Mark’s Hospital underwent this procedure, which
was referred to as “mucosal stripping.” In 1982,
Bellomo and Morganti published a paper in
Coloproctology, a journal that is not indexed but
for decades has nonetheless provided a forum for
experts, including Mann, Nicholls, Buess,
Hermanek, and Wexner, among others. Bellomo
and Morganti reported an impressive series of 820
patients who underwent manual transanal excision
and an internal sphincterotomy for a small rectal
external mucosal prolapse. They were no recurrences or case of postoperative anal incontinence
and just three cases of mild anal stricture, all successfully managed by anal dilations. These results
are hard to believe and it may well have been the
case that most of the patients with complications
and failures were lost at follow-up, considering
that other investigators, mentioned in Chap. 1,
have reported a relatively high soling rate following internal sphincterotomy for anal fissure.
Moreover, in none of those series was there 0
recurrences rate after either perineal or transanal
surgery for rectal prolapse.
10.6 Circular Stapled Transanal Prolapsectomy
We first described this operation as belonging to
the “pre-PPH era” (Pescatori et al., 1997, available
at www.ucp-club.it/medici_articolo.asp), although
basically it was a PPH. Only two of the 10 patients
in that published series had an external prolapse,

192
10 External Rectal Prolapse
Fig. 10.4 a Circular stapled trans-
anal prolapsectomy. A double
“purse-string” suture is carried out
to remove a large mucosal cylinder (rectal internal prolapse)
Fig. 10.4 b Stapler is inserted Fig. 10.4 c End of the mechanical suture
all with a size less than 3 cm. There were no postoperative complications. A double purse-string
was performed in one patient to excise a larger
segment of prolapsed mucosa (Fig. 10.4).
and had three cases of bleeding. In the series of
nine patients of Carriero et al. (2010), there were
no postoperative complications, but the authors
recommended not using this procedure in patients
with sphincter weakness.
The procedure is costly but has the advantage
10.7 Transanal Rectal Prolapsectomy Using the Contour Stapling Device
that it is minimally invasive. However, when the
prolapsed bowel is divided along its anterior
aspects, the surgeon is relatively “blind,” as the
There are only a few reports in the literature, one
of them from a group in Naples, Romano et al.
(2009). Those authors reported no significant complication in three patients operated on using this
novel procedure. The size of the prolapse was less
than 10 cm in all cases. Lieske et al. (2010) treated 20 patients using the same Transtar technique
prolapsed pouch of Douglas cannot be seen before
the resection is performed. Therefore, there is the
risk of injury to the peritoneal cul-de-sac, together
with a descended bowel loop. Further studies on
larger series with longer follow-up are needed
before the “Contour-Altemeier” can be deemed as
safe and effective.

10.9 An Unforgettable Complication
Fig. 10.5 El Sibai and Shafik’s operation for prolapse: electrocauterization and plication of the rectum. Disepithelialized strips are
made by electrocautery from the dentate line to the top, after which Delorme’s plication is performed
193
a Delorme-Rehn operation was scheduled, i.e., rec-
10.8 Cauterization-Plication According
to El-Sibai and Shafik
tal mucosectomy, rectal muscle plication, and
recto-anal anastomosis. However, in the operating
theatre, with the patient having been administered
These two Egyptian authors reported no postoper-
ative complications in 28 patients operated on
using this technique. A postoperative improvement of anal continence was noted in 17. Based
on my own, limited experience with this technique, it is a kind of mini-Delorme, without excision of the rectal mucosa. Instead several vertical
strips are subjected to diathermy to disepithelialize sites where a series of concertina-like sutures
will be positioned to lift up the prolapsed rectum.
The operation is illustrated in Fig. 10.5. I have
performed this technique in a few patients with
internal rectal mucosal prolapse and obstructed
defecation. One patient had severe postoperative
bleeding necessitating re-operation, while another patient, with a 3-cm external mucosal prolapse,
had an uneventful postoperative course.
spinal anesthesia and the anal sphincters relaxed,
the prolapse turned out to be full-thickness and
double the originally determined size. Therefore, I
decided to carry out an Altemeier procedure.
Everything went well until the end. Once the colo-
anal anastomosis and levatorplasty were complet-
ed, I noticed a bit of prolapsed mucosa protruding
through the anus, just a small ectropion, which was
not only aesthetically unpleasant but also a poten-
tial cause of postoperative soiling. I simply
touched it with diathermy, with just the gray spot
of the burned mucosa slowly retracting above the
anal verge. Postoperative management consisted of
intravenous fluids and nil per os for 48 hours, as
the pouch of Douglas had been opened and partly
resected to reduce the elytrocele and to raise a
descended loop of the small bowel.
One day after starting light oral feeding, the
patients had fever, crampy abdominal pain, abdom-
10.9 An Unforgettable Complication
inal tenderness on palpation, and a painful pouch of
Douglas on digital exploration. The colo-anal anasThis case took place in July 2001 and involved a
37-year-old female, nulliparous and a heavy smoker, with an external rectal prolapse that, upon initial examination, was prevalently mucosal and 6
cm long. Due to the characteristics of the prolapse,
tomosis was intact. A bowel movement consisted of
only a small quantity of fluid feces. Pain increased
and her temperature was elevated. We realized that
she was frankly peritonitic and decided to reopen
her abdomen on postoperative day five.

194
10 External Rectal Prolapse
What did we find at re-intervention?
The peritoneal cavity was full of fluid fecal matter,
and, after adequate suction and irrigation with povidone iodine, a small perforation of the lower sigmoid was detected, just above the colo-anal anastomosis. No large bowel diverticula were present. The
patient had been intubated under general anesthesia
but had respiratory failure during the operation, due
to the fact that she was a heavy smoker. After adequate lung ventilation and respiratory support, her
respiratory pattern normalized. The perforation was
then closed with three slowly absorbable stitches
and a proximal sigmoidostomy was fashioned. The
patient was discharged after an uneventful postoperative course (Fig. 10.6). The stoma was closed after
3 months and no sign of recurrent rectal prolapse
was found at 2 years follow-up.
The localized sigmoid ischemia caused by the
diathermy of the mucosal ectropion had caused the
bowel perforation. The ectropion was at the level
of the lower sigmoid sutured to the anal canal,
inside the peritoneal cavity, and not protected by
the levators ani, unlike in a rectal mucosal ectropi-
on, which may be safely coagulated transanally.
I never made the mistake again of under-evaluating the size of a rectal prolapse, which had determined the change in the surgical policy, from a
Delorme to an Altemeier procedure. Now, I always
evaluate the extent of the rectal prolapse by performing the examination with the patient not in the Sims,
but in a squatting position, as illustrated in Figure
10.7. Needless to say, after an Altemeier procedure, I
no longer use diathermy nor do I resect any piece of
mucosa above the colo-anal suture.
For those of you who are superstitious, let me
finish by saying that the unfortunate patient was
my thirteenth Altemeier!
Fig. 10.6 Sigmoid perforation mechanism after Altemeier’s
operation, as described in “An Unforgettable Complication.”
The pouch of Douglas is shown in red. The seemingly trivial
electrocauterization of a small mucosal prolapse of the sigmoid
induced a wall ischemia. At first bowel movement (arrows), a
perforation occurred in the pouch of Douglas, pulled down
almost to the perineal plane. The consequence was peritonitis
requiring urgent re-operation of the patient. Last image: suture
of the intestinal defect and temporary colostomy
Fig. 10.7 With the patient straining while in squatting
position, the size of the rectal prolapse can be precisely evaluated

Summary
195
Summary
Different transanal and transperineal surgeries may
be performed in patients with external rectal prolapse, the most commonly used being the Delorme
and Altemeier procedures. Both may traumatize
the sphincters and affect or involve the excision of
the rectal reservoir, thus causing postoperative
incontinence, which is unlikely to occur following
abdominal sacral rectopexy. Complications after
Delorme and Altemeier occur in around 20% of the
cases. Sacral pelvic hematoma and anastomotic
dehiscence, possibly followed by anorectal stricture, are likely to require a re-intervention. Sepsis
and bleeding can usually be managed with conservative management. Proctalgia and urinary retention are rare. Complications related to heart, lung,
and renal diseases are not infrequent following the
Altemeier procedure, as it is often carried out in
elderly and fragile patients. Nevertheless the operative mortality is as low as 0.4%.
Transvaginal and transperineal mesh rectopexies may be followed by sepsis and bleeding, but
these patients seldom require re-operation.
Cauterization-plication of the rectum, tran sanal mucosal stripping, circular stapled prolapsectomy, and Contour Transtar are not accompanied by significant postoperative complications,
but only a few small series have been published
so far.
Suggested Readings
Agachan F, Pfeifer J, Joo JS, Nogueras JJ, Weiss EG, Wexner SD
(1997)Results of perineal procedures for the treatment of rec-
tal prolapse. Am Surg 63:9-12
Agachan F, Reissman P, Pfeifer J, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ, Wexn-
er SD (1997) Comparison of three perineal procedures for
the treatment of rectal prolapse. South Med J 90:925-932
Altemeier WA 3rd (1999) Pediatric orthopedic infections: missed
diagnoses. Pediatr Ann 28:718-720
Altomare DF, Binda G, Ganio E, De Nardi P, Giamundo P, Pesca-
tori M; Rectal Prolapse Study Group (2009) Long-term out-
come of Altemeier’s procedure for rectal prolapse. Dis Colon
Rectum 52:698-703
Altomare DF, Pucciani P (2007) Perineal approach to external rec-
tal prolapse: the Delorme procedure. In: Altomare DF, Puc-
ciani F (2007) Rectal prolapse: Diagnosis and Clinical Man-
agement. Springer, pp 89-95
Attuwaybi B, Visco J, Butler B, Cywinski M, Barrios G, Leberer
J, Singh A (2010) The Buffalo experience with Altemeier
procedure for rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 53: 596-597
Beck DE (2002) Surgical therapy for colitis cystica profunda and
solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol 5:231-237
Bellomo R, Morganti I (1982) Results of surgical treatment of
mucosal prolapse of the rectum. Coloproctology 4:65-67
Boccasanta P, Stuto A, Naldini G, Caviglia A, Carriero A (2006)
Opinions and facts on reinterventions after complicated or
failed stapled hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 49:690691; author reply 691-693
Brown AJ, Anderson JH, McKee RF, Finlay IG (2004) Strategy
for selection of type of operation for rectal prolapse based
on clinical criteria. Dis Colon Rectum 47:103-107
Brown AJ, Anderson JH, McKee RF, Finlay IG (2004) Surgery
for occult rectal prolapse. Colorectal Dis 6:176-179
Carditello A, Milone A, Stilo F, Mollo F, Basile M (2003) Sur-
gical treatment of rectal prolapse with transanal resection according to Altemeier. Experience and results. Chir Ital 55:687692
Carriero A, Martellucci J, Talento P (2010) Perineal stapled rec-
tal resection with Contour tranSTARR with Lone Star retractor system. Dis Colon Rectum 53:597
Carriero A, Picchio M, Martellucci J, Talento P, Palimento D,
Spaziani E (2010) Laparoscopic correction of enterocele associated to stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructed
defecation syndrome. Int J Colorectal Dis 25:381-387
Christiansen J (1987) The Delorme operation with retro-anal
plication of the levator muscle in treatment of total prolapse
of the rectum. Ann Chir 41:507-511
Chun SW, Pikarsky AJ, You SY et al (2004) Perineal rectosig-
moidectomy for rectal prolapse: role of levatorplasty. Tech
Coloproctol 8:3-8
Cirocco WC (2010) The Altemeier procedure for rectal pro-
lapse: an operation for all ages. Dis Colon Rectum 53:16181623
Corman ML, Carriero A, Hager T et al (2006) Consensus con-
ference on the stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) for
disordered defaecation. Colorectal Dis 8:98-101
De Nardi P, Osman N, Viola M, Staudacher C (2006) Ischemic
proctitis following Delorme procedure for external rectal
prolapse. Tech Coloproctol 10:253-255
Dekel A, Rabinerson D, Rafael ZB, Kaplan B, Mislovaty B,
Bayer Y (2000) Concurrent genital and rectal prolapse: two
pathologies—one joint operation. BJOG 107:125-129
Dippolito A, Esser S, Reed J 3rd (2005) Anterior modification
of Delorme procedure provides equivalent results to Delorme procedure in treatment of rectal outlet obstruction.
Curr Surg 62:609-612
El-Sibai O, Shafik AA (2002) Cauterization-plication operation
in the treatment of complete rectal prolapse. Tech Coloproctol 6:51-54
Flum AS, Golladay ES, Teitelbaum DH (2010) Recurrent rectal
prolapse following primary surgical treatment. Pediatr Surg
Int 26:427-431
Glasgow SC, Birnbaum EH, Kodner IJ, Fleshman JW, Dietz
DW (2006) Preoperative anal manometry predicts continence after perineal proctectomy for rectal prolapse. Dis
Colon Rectum 49:1052-1058
Gourgiotis S, Baratsis S (2007) Rectal prolapse. Int J Colorec-
tal Dis 22:231-243
Gramkow CS, Lanng C, Fischer A (2005) Altemeier repair of rec-
tal prolapse. Ugeskr Laeger 167:286-289

196
10 External Rectal Prolapse
Gravante G, Venditti D (2006) The Altemeier procedure: new
technologies for an old technique. Dis Colon Rectum
49:1801-1802. Comment on: Dis Colon Rectum 49:652-660
Gurland B, Garrett KA, Firoozi F, Goldman HB (2010) Trans-
vaginal sacrospinous rectopexy: initial clinical experience.
Tech Coloproctol 14:169-173
Kim M, Reibetanz J, Boenicke L, Germer CT, Jayne D, Isbert C
(2010) Quality of life after transperineal rectosigmoidecto-
my. Br J Surg 97:269-272
Kimmins MH, Evetts BK, Isler J, Billingham R (2001) The Al-
temeier repair: outpatient treatment of rectal prolapse. Dis
Colon Rectum 44:565-570
Kling KM, Rongione AJ, Evans B, McFadden DW (1996) The
Delorme procedure: a useful operation for complicated rec-
tal prolapse in the elderly. Am Surg 62:857-860
Kosba Y, Elshazly WG, Abd El Maksoud W (2010) Posterior
sagittal approach for mesh rectopexy as a management of
complete rectal in adults. Int J Colorectal Dis 25:881-886
Lauretta A, Bellomo R, Infantino A (2010) Which approach for
complete rectal prolapse? Orr-Loygue rectopexy vs. De-
lorme procedure. Dis Colon Rectum 53:596
Lazorthes F, Liagre A, Iovino F (2000) Rectal prolapse. J Chir
137:76-81
Lechaux JP, Lechaux D, Perez M (1995) Results of Delorme’s
procedure for rectal prolapse. Advantages of a modified
technique. Dis Colon Rectum 38:301-307
Lee JI, Vogel AM, Suchar AM, Glynn L, Statter MB, Liu DC
(2006) Sequential linear stapling technique for perineal re-
section of intractable pediatric rectal prolapse. Am Surg
72:1212-1215
Lehtola A, Salo JA, Fräki O, Lempinen M (1987) Treatment of
rectal prolapse. A clinical study of 50 consecutive patients.
Ann Chir Gynaecol 76:150-154
Liberman H, Hughes C, Dippolito A (2000) Evaluation and out-
come of the Delorme procedure in the treatment of rectal out-
let obstruction. Dis Colon Rectum 43:188-192
Lieberth M, Kondylis LA, Reilly JC, Kondylis PD (2009) The
Delorme repair for full-thickness rectal prolapse: a retrospec-
tive review. Am J Surg 197:418-423
Lieske B, Conaghan P, Farouk R (2010) Outcome after stapled
perineal rectosigmoidectomy using tranSTARR. Dis Colon
Rectum 53:581
Madiba TE, Baig MK, Wexner SD (2005) Surgical management
of rectal prolapse. Arch Surg 140:63-73
Marchal F, Bresler L, Ayav A et al (2005) Long-term results of
Delorme’s procedure and Orr-Loygue rectopexy to treat
complete rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1785-1790
Martínez Hernández-Magro P, Villanueva Sáenz E, Sandoval
Munro RD (2003) Surgical treatment of complete rectal pro-
lapse. Experience at a colon and rectal surgery service. Rev
Gastroenterol 68:185-191
Milito G, Cadeddu F, Selvaggio I, Grande M (2010) The Delorme
repair for full-thickness rectal prolapse: a retrospective review.
Am J Surg 199:581-582
Mongardini M, Iachetta RP, Cola A, Effetti ED, Custureri F
(2009) Altemeier operation associated with dynamic gracilo-
plasty: a case report. J Med Case Reports 3:9317
Müller-Lobeck H, Duschka L, Schleifer P, Henne T (1996) Rehn-
Delorme operation in pelvic floor insufficiency. Zentralbl Chir
121:692-697
Oliver GC, Vachon D, Eisenstat TE, Rubin RJ, Salvati EP (1994)
Delorme’s procedure for complete rectal prolapse in severely debilitated patients. An analysis of 41 cases. Dis Colon
Rectum 37:461-467
Pascual Montero JA, Martínez Puente MC, Pascual I et al
(2006) Complete rectal prolapse clinical and functional
outcome with Delorme’s procedure. Rev Esp Enferm Dig
98:837-843
Pescatori M, Dodi G, Salafia C, Zbar AP (2005) Rectovaginal fis-
tula after double-stapled transanal rectotomy (STARR) for
obstructed defaecation. Int J Colorectal Dis 20:83-85
Pescatori M, Favetta U, Dedola S, Orsini S (1997) Stapled
transanal excision of rectal mucosal prolapse. Tech Coloproctol 1:96-98
Pescatori M, Zbar AP (2009) Tailored surgery for internal and
external rectal prolapse: functional results of 268 patients operated upon by a single surgeon over a 21-year period. Colorectal Dis 11:410-419
Regenet N, De Kerviler B, Lehur PA (2001) Perineal rectosig-
moid resection for exterior rectal prolapse (Altemeier operation). J Chir 138:153-156
Romano G, Bianco F, Caggiano L (2009) Modified perineal sta-
pled rectal resection with Contour Transtar for full-thickness
rectal prolapse. Colorectal Dis 11:878-881
Sailer M, Bönicke L, Petersen S (2007) Surgical options in the
treatment of rectal prolapse: indications, techniques and results. Zentralbl Chir 132:350-357
Scherer R, Marti L, Hetzer FH (2008) Perineal stapled prolapse
resection: a new procedure for external rectal prolapse. Dis
Colon Rectum 51:1727-1730
Sewonou A, Rioux C, Golliot F et al (2002) Incidence of surgi-
cal site infection in ambulatory surgery: results of the INCISCO surveillance network in 1999-2000. Ann Chir 127:262267
Sielezneff I, Bulgare JC, Sastre B, Sarles JC (1995) Result of sur-
gical treatment of exteriorized rectal prolapse in adults. Experience of 21 years. Ann Chir 49:396-4
The Altemeier repair: outpatient treatment of rectal prolapse.
Kimmins MH, Evetts BK, Isler J, Billingham R (2001) Dis
Colon Rectum 44:565-570
Tobin SA, Scott IH (1994) Delorme operation for rectal prolapse.
Br J Surg 81:1681-1684
Voulimeneas I, Antonopoulos C, Alifierakis E, Ioannides P (2010)
Perineal rectosigmoidectomy for gangrenous rectal prolapse.
World J Gastroenterol 16:2689-2691
Watkins BP, Landercasper J, Belzer GE et al (2003) Long-term
follow-up of the modified Delorme procedure for rectal prolapse. Arch Surg 138:498-502; discussion 502-503
Watts AM, Thompson MR (2000) Evaluation of Delorme’s pro-
cedure as a treatment for full-thickness rectal prolapse 87:218222
Zbar AP, Takashima S, Hasegawa T, Kitabayashi K (2002) Perineal
rectosigmoidectomy (Altemeier’s procedure): a review of physiology, technique and outcome. Tech Coloproctol 6:109-116
Zuo ZG, Song HY, Xu C et al (2010) Application of Altemeier
procedure in the emergent management of acute incarcerated rectal prolapse. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi
13:427-429

Subject Index
A
Abdominoperineal resection of the rectum 16,
Abscess
acute abscess 68, 70, 80, 101
anal abscess 57-80
liver abscess 42
occult abscess 41
perianal abscess 42, 78-79, 91
supralevator abscess 75
Adenocarcinoma of the rectum 109
Adenoma 28, 45, 76, 109-111, 113-116, 118
Adipose tissue 4
Adrenaline 9, 39, 91, 111-113, 123-124, 128, 168, 184
Advanced age 64, 80, 117, 157, 189
Agrapphectomy 44, 140, 152, 160
Altemeier
procedure 150, 156, 183, 188-191, 193-195
proctosigmoidectomy 183
Altemeier’s rectosigmoid resection 187
Anal
condylomata 121-133
continence 57, 65, 68, 69, 72, 80, 89, 127, 128, 131, 146,
149, 150, 166, 169, 172, 174, 176, 184, 188, 193
fissure 1-12, 18, 22, 24, 40, 41, 57, 70, 71, 125, 128, 183,
191
hypertonia 1, 3, 4, 6, 8-10, 12, 19, 29, 39, 41
incontinence 1-5, 17, 20, 40, 42, 64-74, 79, 109, 144-146,
168, 188
manometry 65, 71, 78, 109, 154, 165
perineoplasty 61
reflex 64, 65, 136
retractor 5, 16, 68, 113, 121
spasm 3, 18, 25, 124, 132
stenosis 8, 10, 18, 19, 23, 38, 40, 46-49, 124, 125
stretch 6, 7, 12
surgery 6, 64, 66, 77, 80
tampon 24, 44
ultrasound 78, 103, 104
Anastomotic dehiscence 89, 93, 121, 127, 144, 185, 188, 195
Anismus 92, 135, 137-138, 153-155, 160
Anoplasty 2, 4, 6-8, 10, 12, 20, 40-41, 48-49, 61, 63, 115, 121,
123-128, 130, 132, 140, 160, 168, 183
Anterior levatorplasty 60-61, 88, 94, 136, 143-144, 153, 160,
166, 169, 178
Anterior resection 35, 85, 90, 109, 111, 117, 121-123, 127,
136-137, 188, 190
Antibiotic prophylaxis 16, 34, 89, 101, 110, 166, 170, 176, 184
Anus
deformed anus 64
gaping anus 72, 167
Anxiety 78, 93, 117, 137-139, 146, 150-151, 154, 157, 160
Ascites 34, 188
B
Balloon endoscopic dilation 126
Biofeedback 42, 49, 65, 71, 92, 109, 118, 121, 125, 136, 147,
154-155, 184
Biopsy forceps 41, 114
Bleeding
intraoperative bleeding 9, 17, 22, 37, 47, 58, 184, 189, 191
postoperative bleeding 18, 23, 39, 57-58, 76, 79, 90, 92,
95, 99, 102, 114, 124, 149-150, 153, 157, 170, 193
rectal bleeding 1, 10, 17, 20-22, 25, 27-29, 38-39, 49, 58,
80, 88, 104, 111, 118, 140-141, 147, 149, 152-153, 155-
157, 159, 184, 188
Block 25, 38, 140-141, 144-145, 152, 157, 175, 177
Blood transfusion 38, 43, 57, 111
Botulinum toxin A (Botox) 2, 4, 6, 12, 19, 38-40, 41, 154
Bulbo-cavernosus muscle 74, 86, 88, 90, 91, 94
Bulking agent 6, 42, 49, 72, 80, 121, 125, 140, 146, 160, 165,
168, 174, 178
Buschke-Löwenstein 130-132
C
Calcium channel blockers 2, 41
Cancer 18, 32, 57, 109-112, 115, 117, 123-124, 132, 155, 170,
172
Carcinoid 109, 111, 114
Cauterization-plication 193, 195
Chemotherapy 18, 115, 121
Coagulation 17, 38, 43-44, 46, 156, 168
Coaptite 6, 72, 174
Coccygeal muscle 115
Collagene mesh 153
Colo-anal anastomosis 117, 151, 187, 190, 193-194
Colonic
propulsion 190
reservoir 190
Colonoscopy 28, 78, 115-117, 157-159
Colorectal surgeon 2, 5, 34, 44, 57, 65-66, 68, 78-79, 85, 87,
123, 136-137, 148, 160, 173
197

Subject Index198
Colostomy
defunctioning colostomy 33, 42-43
diverting colostomy 85, 89, 92, 95
Conflict of interest 33, 67, 149, 174
Constipation 6, 10, 17, 27, 135-137, 150, 154, 158, 171-172,
174, 176, 183, 191
Contour stapler 145, 147-148
Crohn’s disease 1, 8, 10, 12, 18, 20, 59-60, 67, 78, 80, 85-86,
89-90, 95
Cryotherapy 123
CT-scan 28
Curettage 7, 9, 41, 59, 61-62, 64, 67, 69-70, 75, 102-103
D
Defecography 65, 113, 135-136, 139, 141-142, 152, 154
Dehiscence 4, 7-8, 10-12, 16, 18, 28, 33, 35, 38, 41, 49, 60-61,
64, 68-69, 74-75, 80, 88-90, 93, 95, 100-104, 106, 109-
110, 112, 114-115, 117, 121, 124-128, 132-133, 140-142,
144, 148, 153, 158-159, 165, 169-170, 172, 183-186, 188-
189, 195
Depezzer 68, 131
Depression 137-139, 150, 154, 160
Diabetes 8, 10, 12, 18, 43, 60, 74, 80, 114, 117
Diathermy 17, 27-28, 38, 45-47, 57, 68, 75, 77, 99, 106, 111-
113, 115, 124, 128, 130, 132, 139, 152, 166, 168-169, 177,
184, 186, 193-194
Digital
exploration 78, 92, 128, 141, 143, 154, 159, 165, 167, 184, 193
rectal examination 6, 10, 27, 30
Digitoclasia 7
Dilatation 7-10, 25, 38, 40-41, 43, 47-49, 122, 140, 158
Diltiazem 2, 4, 38-39
Diverticulum 10-12, 30, 32, 44-45, 121, 136, 147
Dog’s ears 16
Draw-the-family test 3
Dynamic MRI 26
Dynamic perineal ultrasound 65
Dyspareunia 88, 95, 152-153, 160, 169, 178
Dysplasia 32, 36, 115, 123
E
Electrostimulation
electrostimulated acupuncture 62
of the posterior tibial nerve 6, 72, 147
tibial nerve electrostimulation 42, 168
transanal electrostimulation 6, 42, 65, 71, 79, 146, 154
Elytrocele 148, 151, 190, 193
Emphysema
cervical emphysema 28, 44
Encirclement procedure 74, 172, 183
EndoGIA 114, 144, 152-153
Endoscopic stricturectomy 41
Endosponge 102
Enemas 39, 42, 171, 173, 178
Enterocele 33-34, 45, 113, 136-139, 148, 152, 160, 186, 189-190
Excision
hemorrhoid excision 16-18, 36, 76
of the fissure 4, 6, 8, 12, 41
of the fissure and injection of botulinum toxin A 6
tags excision 40
External orifice 58, 64, 76, 91, 104
External rectal prolapse 183-184, 188, 193, 195
F
False tract 58, 76
Fascio-adipose cutaneous flap 100-101
Fecal
impaction 1, 40, 111, 167
incontinence 1, 4, 24, 57, 64-65, 78, 80, 90, 95, 109, 115,
125, 137, 141, 144-145, 153-154, 165, 167, 169-172, 174-
176, 178, 191
stasis 155
urgency 1, 121, 144, 149, 152-153, 160
Fecaloma 4, 20, 22, 32, 38-40
Fecoliths 30
Ferguson procedure 15-20, 23, 26, 39, 44, 47, 49
Fibrin glue 59, 64, 66-68, 80, 100, 102
Fibrosis 11, 19, 26, 63, 66, 68, 72, 79, 92, 111, 121-122, 125-
128, 140-141, 156, 160, 167, 170, 172
Fissure 1-12, 15, 17-18, 21-22, 24, 40-41, 48-49, 57, 70-71,
125, 128, 166, 183, 191
Fissurectomy 2, 4, 12
Fistula
anal fistula 1, 3, 27, 38, 41, 49, 57, 59, 62-66, 68-70, 72,
76-79, 89, 91, 103
horse-shoe fistula 59
iatrogenic fistula 58
persisting fistula 67, 69
rectovaginal fistula (RVF) 31-32, 44, 50, 85, 89-91, 93,
109, 112-113, 118, 147-148, 152-153, 169, 189
recurrent fistula 69-70
trans-sphincteric fistula 57-59, 65-66, 68-71, 75, 80
Fistuloscope 69
Fistulotomy 57-59, 66-67, 69-70, 76-79, 88, 90-91, 169
Flap
cutaneous flap 8, 36-37, 63, 66, 68, 76, 80, 100-101, 115, 118
dehiscence 69, 75, 115
diamond flap 125
house flap 115, 125, 128, 132
Limberg flap 101-102
Martius flap 89-90
rectal advancement flap 59-60, 62, 64, 66-67, 69, 75, 88-
89, 95, 103
rhomboid flap 100-103
skin flap 7-9, 36, 68, 77, 117, 131, 167
Torpedo flap 115
Flavonoids 38, 41
Foley
balloon 130
catheter 39, 44, 49, 57, 75-76, 92-93, 114, 130-131, 140,
157
Fournier’s gangrene 16, 42-43, 118
G
Gas incontinence 4-5, 38, 42
Gastrointestinal stromal tumors
General surgeon 57, 85, 104, 121, 150
Gluteoplasty 86, 88, 168-169, 172, 178
109

Subjec
t Index 199
Graciloplasty 44, 86, 88, 95, 165, 168-169, 172-173, 178
Granuloma 49, 79, 140, 145, 159
Granulomatous polyp 27, 29, 44, 109
H
Harmonic scalpel 113, 189-190
Hartmann procedure 23, 34-35, 44, 110, 114
Headache 9
Hegar dilator 40, 44, 47, 111, 127, 130, 159
HeLP 19, 22
Hematoma
perianal hematoma 23, 39, 152
retro-rectal hematoma 32
Hematuria 21
Hemodialysis 48
Hemorrhage 12, 15, 18, 21-23, 33, 38-39, 44-45, 49, 57, 92-93,
99, 106, 111, 114, 141, 149, 153, 160, 170, 184, 186
Hemorrhoidectomy
emergency hemorrhoidectomy 20, 40
Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy 17-19, 23, 26, 35, 40-41, 47,
49, 113, 184
laser hemorrhoidectomy 40
Hemorrhoidopexy
manual hemorrhoidopexy 35
stapled hemorrhoidopexy 15, 17, 22-23, 25, 27, 30-31, 35-
36, 41-42, 45, 49
Hemorrhoids 15-50
accessory hemorrhoids 19
hemorrhoid grade 26
hemorrhoidal thrombosis 21, 50
sentinel hemorrhoid 5
thrombosed hemorrhoids 20-22, 40
Hemostasis 7, 9, 17-19, 23, 25, 35, 39, 44, 57-58, 99, 109, 113,
124, 167
Hemostatic
suture 22, 95
tampon 19
Hidradenitis suppurativa 74, 80
Histological analysis 9
HIV/AIDS 60, 131
Holistic approach 3, 78, 135, 137, 165, 171
HPV (human papilloma virus) 123
Hydrocolon lavage 125, 135-136
Hymen 176
Hyperbaric oxygen therapy 8
Hypertonia 1, 3-4, 6, 8-10, 12, 19, 26, 29, 38-39, 41, 143
Hypertrophied papilla 5
Hypopituitarism 1
I
Iceberg syndrome 135, 137, 139, 147, 150
Ileostomy 136, 158-159
Immunosuppression 60
Incontinence 1-6, 10, 12, 15, 17, 19-20, 22-24, 26-27, 36, 38,
40, 42, 49, 57, 59, 61, 64-71, 74, 78-80, 88, 90-91, 95, 109-
110, 112-115, 117-118, 121-122, 124-125, 133, 137, 140-
142, 144-147, 152-155, 157, 160, 165, 167-172, 174-178,
183-184, 186, 188-191, 195
Infected sinus 99, 101, 104
Inflammatory bowel disease 64
Internal mucosal prolapse of the rectum 10, 21, 41-42, 138
Internal orifice 59, 66, 68-69, 74-75, 80, 104, 106
Intussusception 30, 50, 114, 121, 136, 138-146, 155-156, 159,
189
Irrigation 39-40, 76, 78, 125, 143, 157, 194
Irritable bowel syndrome 64, 72, 91, 146, 150, 159
Ischemia 9, 45, 47, 63, 68, 92, 100, 112, 124-126, 128, 135,
147, 155, 172, 185-186, 194
Ischiorectal cavity 57, 76
K
Keloid 40
L
Laparoscopic-assisted PPH 23
Laser
depilation 103
probe 22, 64, 80
therapy 27, 123
Lay open 5, 57-59, 63, 65-66, 68-69, 74, 76, 80, 86, 88, 91,
100, 102-103
Leiomyosarcoma 109
Levatorplasty 44, 60-61, 87-88, 93-95, 136-137, 140, 143-144,
153, 160, 166, 169, 178, 188-191, 193
LIFT (ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract) 66, 68, 70-
71, 80
LigaSure 16-17, 21
Local anesthesia 7, 22, 37, 39-42, 59, 101, 103, 158-159, 184,
189
Local infection 89-90, 160, 170, 175-176
Lone Star retractor 24, 186-187, 191
M
Magnetic resonance imaging 11, 65
Manometry 3, 6, 10, 19, 25, 65, 71, 78, 91, 109, 154, 157, 165
Marsupialization 58, 80, 100
Mediastinum 117
Metronidazole 38, 41, 110, 117, 141, 166, 176
Milligan-Morgan 15-20, 23, 26, 38-41, 43-46, 48-49, 124
Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy 18, 20, 23, 26, 38, 43, 46,
48-49, 124
Muco-cutaneous bridge 19
Mucopexy 19-22, 42, 50
Mucosal ectropion 37, 40, 115, 124, 184, 186, 194
Mucosal stripping 141, 191, 195
Mucosectomy
Delorme mucosectomy 30, 85
rectal mucosectomy 26, 144, 156, 183, 184, 193
Multiparous patient 6, 80, 185
N
Natal cleft 99
Necrosectomy 42-43, 117-118
Necrosis 9, 22, 42-44, 77, 117
Nephrectomy 35
Nifedipine 25-26
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
