Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_1137_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
02.09.2026
Размер:
19 Мб
Скачать
88
Table 4.1 Surgical procedures for RVF and the most frequent postoperative complications, as reported in the literature (abdomi-
nal procedures are excluded)
Operation Author and year Reported complication
Transanal route
Rectal advancement flap Goldberg, 1990 Suture dehiscence
Hoexter, 1990 Sepsis and dehiscence
Lowry, 1992 Suture dehiscence
Marchesa, 1998 Sepsis and dehiscence
TEM plasty Darwood, 2008
Surgisis plug Gonsalves, 2009 Plug detachment
Perineal route
Lay-open Belt 1969, Anal incontinence
Francois, 1990 Anal incontinence
Fistulotomy and layered suture Hudson, 1977 Rectal bleeding
Puborectalis muscle interposition Oom, 2006 Local sepsis
Excision, suture, and sphincteroplasty Gagliardi, 2007 Suture dehiscence
Pinto, 2010 Dehiscence, bleeding
Bulbocavernosus muscle interposition Cui, 2009 Dyspareunia
Graciloplasty Lefèvre, 2009 Loss of libido
Gluteoplasty Lefèvre, 2009 Dyspareunia
Transvaginal route
Inversion and layered closure Given, 1970 Suture dehiscence
Episiotomy and layered closure Tancer, 1990 Bleeding, cellulitis
Vaginal advancement flap Ruffolo, 2009 Suture dehiscence
Transcoccygeal route
Rectal advancement flap Schouten, 2009
a
Only one case.
b
All complex RVF recurring after previous repair.
a
b
4 Rectovaginal Fistulae
Suture dehiscence

4.3 Bleeding and Dyspareunia

4.3.1 Bleeding

Bleeding rarely occurs after RVF repair (Tancer et al., 1990) but when it does it may be dramatic and require emergency re-intervention, as discussed at the end of the chapter. It is likely to be successful­ly managed by suturing the bleeding area, but may also require a diverting stoma. In a series of 184 patients treated at the Cleveland Clinic in Florida, Pinto et al. (2010) reported three cases of severe bleeding in which re-operation was required.

4.3.2 Dyspareunia

Dyspareunia may follow anterior levatorplasty or, more often, puborectalis muscle interposition. It is
due to the fact that the bulk of the muscle tissue sutured at the level of the rectovaginal septum can hinder sexual intercourse. Dyspareunia has been also reported in association with either a loss or a reduction of libido following graciloplasty for recurrent RVF (Lefèvre, 2009). This complication is prevented by a rectal flap advancement per­formed via the transcoccygeal route, as reported by Schouten and Oom (2009). Only one of the nine patients operated upon by Cui (2009) using bulbo­cavernosus muscle interposition complained of dyspareunia after surgery.

4.4 Local Sepsis and Suture Dehiscence

This complication has occurred in 10% of our patients after RVF repair (Gagliardi and Pescatori,
2007). Similar findings were reported by Pinto et
4.3 Bleeding and Dyspareunia
89
Fig. 4.2 Surgical procedure of reverse suturing after excision
of a transvaginal high rectovaginal fistula (black). The reversed stitches, translocated to the rectal side, prevent problems with the sutures and facilitate an effective plasty
al. (2010) in patients treated at the Cleveland Clinic in Florida, with sepsis and suture breakdown occur­ring in 13 out of 125 patients. When confined to the bowel, the dehiscence may either heal spontaneous­ly following the application of local healing oint­ments/gels or in response to systemic antibiotics. Alternatively, treatment may require a diverting sigmoidostomy, with or without re-suture of the dehiscent wound, depending on its dimension and provided that the local infection has subsided.
A method to prevent (or minimize the risk of) anastomotic breakdown when performing complex procedures, e.g., a Martius flap or layered closure with sphincter reconstruction, is to prolong the administration of antibiotics beyond the typical antibiotic prophylaxis and to give the patient a course of intravenous feeding with enough calories to favor tissue healing. Alternatively, it may be preferable to perform a temporary diverting stoma, usually a sigmoidostomy, which does not increase the risk of RVF recurrence. The latter may be car­ried out to prevent fecal contamination in more complex repairs, such as the inverted layered clo­sure with a rectal advancement flap (Fig. 4.2).
According to Wexner (in Pinto et al., 2010), heavy smokers, as previously reported by the Schouten group for anal fistula surgery (see Chap.
3), are at risk for anastomotic dehiscence, as smoke stimulates the production of catecholamines
and thus causes vasoconstriction, with the decreased blood supply in turn affecting the heal­ing properties of the tissues. Crohn’s disease is another condition that increases the risk of suture breakdown after RVF repair, with a dehiscence rate of 60% reported in these patients by Lowry and Goldberg in 1992. Fry and Kodner (1989) reported a much lower dehiscence rate of 20% in their Crohn’s patients. Interestingly, Garcia Olmo et al. (2003) suggested the therapeutic use of stem cells in patients with RVF and Crohn’s diseases.
The construction of a flap offers several advan­tages for patients with anal continence, which is more often seen in patients with Crohn’s disease. These patients may have a less compliant, infla ­med rectum and a reduced stool consistency due to diarrheal episodes. By carrying out a flap, one may avoid the formation of a perineal wound, possibly affecting the sensory component of anal conti­nence, and an anal deformity, which is likely to favor postoperative soiling. The question then becomes whether the surgical strategy should include a vaginal or a rectal flap. After reviewing the literature, Ruffolo et al. (2010) recommended the vaginal flap, the main reason being that the construction of a rectal flap requires a transanal procedure with stretching of the sphincter. Regarding the need for a stoma, Marchesa et al. (1998) preferred the use of a diverting colostomy
90
when dealing with Crohn’s RVF in patients treated at the Cleveland Clinic in Ohio.
Darwood and Borley (2008) successfully treat­ed a patient with a rectovaginal fistula following an anterior resection of the rectum using TEM. As the latter technique is minimally invasive, it is less likely than conventional procedures to cause post­operative complications. However, this remains to be confirmed in larger series.

4.5 Re-interventions

A surgeon dealing with RVF patients should be prepared to re-operate, mostly due to dehiscences or recurrences. About one-third of RVF patients need more than one operation to be cured, under­lining the importance of alternative procedures, as noted above.
The crucial point is that a patient who needs a re-intervention is at greater risk of complications and failures, namely, local sepsis, suture dehis­cences, bleeding, and incontinence. In fact, the patient’s tissues are less vascularized, the anal sphincters are weaker, etc., due to the previous operation. This is true also for other proctological diseases, such as hemorrhoids (see Chap. 2). It is known that re-interventions for either complicated or recurrent hemorrhoids, namely, after procedures for prolapsing hemorrhoids, are more likely to cause postoperative bleeding (Brusciano et al.,
2004). Based on these considerations, surgically treated tissues are less vascularized and surgically treated sphincters are weaker and more prone to causing anal incontinence. Schouten and Oom (2009) recommended the avoidance of a per­ineal/transanal/transvaginal route in these cases, instead re-operating by another approach, through tissues with a good vascular supply and leaving intact the anal sphincters. They operated on a num­ber of patients with recurrent RVF via a trans­sacral approach, with successful outcome. There was only one local infection in eight cases man­aged with a mucosal advancement flap. It should be noted, however, that most of the RVF in this Dutch series were post-obstetric, i.e., the patients with the best prognosis. The local sepsis rate was as high as 42% after another type of RVF repair, interposition of the puborectalis muscle, carried out by the same authors (Oom et al., 2006).
4 Rectovaginal Fistulae

4.6 Drains

Beck and Wexner (1992) recommend the use of a drain in repairs of high RVF with long tracts, in order to decrease the risk of sepsis and dehis­cences. The Surgisis plug (Biodesign, Cook Medical, Bloomington, USA) has been used for the management of RVF, but it was displaced due to suture dehiscence in 42% of the patients in one series, with the fistula tract open within 4 weeks and requiring the implantation of another plug (Gonsalves et al., 2009). However, infection did not occur in any of the patients operated on by these surgeons.

4.7 Fecal Incontinence

Postoperative fecal incontinence was a complaint in 15% of the patients I operated upon for RVF (Gagliardi and Pescatori, 2007). When graded according to our validated system (Pescatori et al.,
1992), incontinence was due to liquid stool in all cases, occurring at least once a week (B2, score 4) in two-thirds and occasionally (B1, score 3) in one-third of the cases. However, some of these patients already suffered from incontinence prior to surgery, due to either diarhea or, more rarely, an inflamed rectal reservoir (in cases of Crohn’s dis­ease) or an obstetric injury to the anal sphincters.
In an earlier report Belt (1969) found that fecal incontinence always occurred after laying open RVF. Francois et al. (1990) reported fecal inconti­nence in three out of nine surgically treated patients. I carried out a fistulotomy in a 35-year­old patient with Crohn’s disease. While she remained continent, the tract was very low, ano­vulvar rather than rectovaginal. The risk of postop­erative incontinence may be minimized by using a tailored approach, i.e., avoiding transanal repair, which is likely to stretch the anal sphincters, in patients with weak pelvic floor. The use of a Martius flap, transposing the bulbocavernosus muscle, might be a good option in these patients (Cui, 2009). Alternatively, as suggested by Lowry in Beck and Wexner’s book (1993), anterior sphincter reconstruction may be required in case of injured anal sphincters. Annaway and Hull (2008) reported good results using this procedure, and a
4.7 Fecal Incontinence
91
a
h
m
qrs t uv
bc d ef g
ij k l
nop
Fig. 4.3 Sphincter-sparing procedure, aimed at preventing potoperative incontinence, in a patient with recurrent anal and rectovagi-
nal fistula a Patient in the lithotomy position. On the left: external opening of a vulvar fistula (images by N. Clemente); b probing of the fistulous track; c lay-open of a chronic abscess at the site of a Bartolini’s gland; d the cavity is completely laid-open after the partial division of both the bulbo-cavernosus and the superficial transverse muscle of the perineum; e the cavity is curetted with a Volkman spoon; f the underlying recto-vaginal fistula is probed; g a seton is inserted in the fistula; h the external orifice of a con­comitant anal fistula is found and the small perianal abscess is curetted; i the horse-shoe anterior perianal fistula is probed; j the fis­tula is laid-open, dividing just a few fibers of the subcutaneous part of the external sphincter, anteriorly; k the fistulotomy has been carried out (arrow); l anal trimming; m the recto-vaginal fistula is excised; n it will be sent for histological examination; o a gauze soaked with Betadine is inserted in the vagina; p endoanal view: a Beak Sapimed anoscope has been inserted and a rectal mucosal advancement flap is prepared, injecting adrenaline and saline 1:200,000 under the submucosal layer; q vaginal aspect: the post-fis­tulectomy cavity is shown; r suture of the vaginal wall: 1) reconstruction of the bulbo-cavernosus muscle using 2/0 vicryl; s 2) the superficial layer of the vaginal wall has been sutured; t endoanal view: the rectal flap is sutured without tension to the subcutaneous part of the external sphincter, to cover the surgical defect in the lower rectum; u end of the surgical procedure; v two months later, the wounds are healed and the patient, in the Sims position, is fully continent
similar positive experience was obtained in our series, as noted above.
Anal and vaginal ultrasound (US) may be help­ful to detect anterior occult lesions of the external sphincter in patients who do not present with clini­cally evident anal incontinence. When anal US and manometry are not available, a careful anamnesis and physical examination will allow surgeons to
easily identify patients at risk for postoperative incontinence, i.e., those who are multiparous, have a perineal descent and a short anal canal, suffer from irritable bowel syndrome, and have already undergone proctological surgery. However, an operation aimed at preserving anal sphincters may be carried out even when a fistula-in-ano is associ­ated to RVF, as illustrated in Fig. 4.3.
92

4.8 An Unforgettable Complication

The patient is a friendly, smiling, but rather nervous 42-year-old woman who came to my office accom­panied by her husband and daughter. One year before, in 2001, she had undergone a STARR proce­dure, performed for obstructed defecation, but she was still constipated, with the constant need to strain, unable to empty her bowel, and spending hours at the toilet, self-digitating. During digital exploration, when I asked her to strain, I clearly felt a paradoxical contraction of the puborectalis mus­cle. Pushing my finger towards the vagina, I also felt a modest rectocele. The patient had two vaginal deliveries, which had caused the rectocele. She then had undergone a stapled rectotomy, aimed at its cor­rection, but, due to the repeated excessive straining against a contracted puborectalis, it had, not surpris­ingly, recurred. At proctoscopy, a prevalently ante­rior rectal internal mucosal prolapse was detectable that almost reached the anal verge on straining. At this point, the reader might ask how all this relates to RVF, but the answer will soon become clear. “Your main problem is the non-relaxing muscle,” I said to the anxious woman, showing her the con­tracted puborectalis on the screen of the US device. “You need a course of pelvic floor exercises.” A few months later, after seeing a physiotherapist, she returned for a follow-up exam, still constipated despite several sessions of biofeedback training. The muscle tended to relax but the rectocele and the prolapse of course persisted. The woman was even more distraught and agitated. She pleaded for a repair operation, to which I did not agree. But when I saw her again, 2 months later, she was still very upset and said that her obstructed defecation had worsened. I agreed that surgery was necessary and scheduled her for a Sarles mucosectomy to repair both the rectocele and the prolapse. Three weeks later, I performed the operation, which was techni­cally demanding due to the fibrosis of the lower rec­tum caused by the previous operation. On postoper­ative day two, the patient had her first, albeit painful, bowel movement, with some pus discharge. Her temperature rose to 39°C and she was very uncomfortable. Two days later, at digital explo­ration, I felt a small gap in the rectoanal suture; moreover, the patients told me that she felt air com­ing out through the vagina. “The same feeling I had
4 Rectovaginal Fistulae
sometimes after the STARR operation” she added. “But you never reported this symptom to me before!” I said. “Well, doctor, you never asked me if I felt a loss of air through the vagina!” she replied. I discussed with her the need for re-intervention, explaining that in case of suture breakdown and RVF, a diverting stoma should have been carried out, but she strongly refused a possible stoma for­mation.
What did I find? What did I do in the operating theatre? Please provide your own hypotheses.
The patient was returned to the operating theatre, with the findings shown in Fig. 4.4. A Foley catheter was positioned in the bladder and the anal canal was gently stretched with a dilator. The rec­toanal anastomosis of the Sarles (a type of anterior Delorme) appeared to be almost completely dehis­cent. There was tissue ischemia, pus discharge, and a high fistula was clearly detectable, with a wide communication between the lower rectum and the vagina. After a complex perineal, transanal, and transvaginal repair, as a stoma could not be fash­ioned due to the patient’s refusal, a course of par­enteral nutrition was started and the bowel confined to prevent fecal contamination of the sutures. One week later, the patient was doing well, with the wounds sutures apparently healed, but as she was not allowed to eat and had to stay in bed, she became increasingly agitated, until one afternoon she violently pulled out the Foley catheter, with the balloon inflated, causing bleeding from the per­ineum. Despite perineal compression with gauze, the hemorrhage did not stop. It was late in the evening, the patient was pale and tachycardic, and it was not possible to admit her to the operating room to administer anesthesia and suture the bleeding site; therefore, I had her transferred to a better­equipped, larger hospital, where an urgent reopera­tion was carried out, with suturing of the bleeding area, i.e., part of the surgical wound at the vaginal side. In addition, a diverting colostomy was per­formed. The patient was discharged one week later. The stoma was closed after a few months. After 8 years, she still suffers from obstructed defecation. In conclusion: postoperative bleeding is rare but may be dramatic after RVF repair. And never oper­ate on a very anxious patient with anismus and obstructed defecation.
4.8 An Unforgettable Complication
Fig. 4.4 a “Unforgettable complication:” a mildly symptomatic
rectovaginal fistula, after STARR, that usually becomes clini­cally evident as a result of anastomotic dehiscence for local sep­sis after Delorme prolapsectomy. At re-operation, a fistula exci­sion with levatorplasty was performed. The patient refused a co­vering stoma and instead underwent peripheral total parenteral nu­trition. A second operation became necessary because of an acu­te hemorrhage from the surgical wound, as a result of local trau­ma, i.e., forced removal of the Foley catheter by the patient, who suffered from high levels of anxiety
93
Fig. 4.4 b Transverse incision between the rectum and vagina.
The subcutaneous portion of the external sphincter is seen below and the superficial transverse perineal muscles (pink) above. The patient is in the lithotomy position
Fig. 4.4 c The posterior distal portion of the vagina is intact,
with the vaginal orifice of the fistula situated above
Fig. 4.4 d Vertical incision on the vaginal side
94
Fig. 4.4 e Traction stitches are placed to better view the opera-
tive field, which, from anus to vagina, includes the subcuta­neous portion of the external sphincter, the transverse superfi­cial and deep perineal muscles, and the bulbocavernosus muscle
4 Rectovaginal Fistulae
Fig. 4.4 f Clamp tips are inserted in the fistula orifice
Fig. 4.4 g Both lateral branches of the puborectal muscle are
placed on the medial side and sutured, performing an anterior levatorplasty, to interpose vital and well vascularized tissue bet­ween the rectum and vagina
Fig. 4.4 h Cutaneous plasty was performed to create more
space between the anus and the vulva

Summary

Fig. 4.4 i The surgical wound is incompletely sutured, to pre-
vent sepsis. The patient refused a covering stoma. Seven days later, bleeding from the depth of the surgical wound occurred, requiring an urgent hemostatic suture, followed by a diverting colostomy that was closed after a few months (from Pescatori,
2011)
Summary
The most feared complication after RVF repair is local sepsis, with suture dehiscence, which may occur in around 10% of patients. It may be pre­vented, or its consequences minimized, by per­forming a diverting stoma at the end of the fistula repair. Dehiscences are more prone to occur (up to 40%) in patients with Crohn’s disease or in those with recurrent RVF, who are operated on with a rectal advancement flap. Postoperative bleeding is rare, but may require re-intervention. Dyspareunia may follow levatorplasty and graciloplasty.
Fecal incontinence is more likely in patients operated upon via a transanal route, due to exces­sive stretching of the sphincters, but may be pre­vented by means of sphincter reconstruction fol­lowing fistulectomy in patients with weak pelvic floor muscles. Alternatively, a transvaginal or a trans-sacral approach may be used.
The best clinical and functional results are achieved in low post-obstetric RVF, as the rectum is healthy and the patient is young. Patients with Crohn’s or post-radiation RVF have the worst prognosis.
95
The surgeon who deals with RVF should be a specialist able to perform more than one proce­dure, as approximately one-third of the patients require repeated interventions to achieve cure.

Suggested Readings

Athanasiadis S, Yazigi R, Köhler A et al (2007) Recovery rates
and functional results after repair for rectovaginal fistula in
Crohn’s disease: a comparison of different techniques. Int J
Colorectal Dis 22:1051-1060 Bassi R, Rademacher J, Savoia A (2006) Rectovaginal fistula af-
ter STARR procedure complicated by haematoma of the
posterior vaginal wall: report of a case. Tech Coloproctol
10:361-363 Belt RL Jr (1969) Repair of anorectal vaginal fistula utilizing seg-
mental advancement of the internal sphincter muscle. Dis
Colon Rectum 12:99-104 Chu M, Crist H, Zaino RJ (2010) Adenocarcinoma arising in a
rectovaginal fistula in Crohn’s disease. Int J Gynecol Pathol
29:497-500 Cui L, Chen D, Chen W et al (2009) Interposition of vital bul-
bocavernosus graft in the treatment of both simple and re-
current rectovaginal fistulas. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:1255-
1259 Darwood RJ, Borley NR (2008) TEM: an alternative method for
the repair of benign recto-vaginal fistulae. Colorectal Dis
10:619-620 de Parades V, Dahmani Z, Blanchard P et al (2010) Endorectal
advancement flap with muscular plication: a modified tech-
nique for rectovaginal fistula repair. Colorectal Dis 13:921-
925 Devesa JM, Devesa M, Velasco GR et al (2007) Benign recto-
vaginal fistulas: management and results of a personal series.
Tech Coloproctol 11:128-134 El-Gazzaz G, Hull TL, Mignanelli E et al (2010) Obstetric and
cryptoglandular rectovaginal fistulas: long-term surgical out-
come; quality of life; and sexual function. J Gastrointest
Surg 14:1758-1763 Ellis CN (2008) Outcomes after repair of rectovaginal fistulas us-
ing bioprosthetics. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1084-1088 Francois Y, Descos L, Vignal J (1990) Conservative treatment of
low rectovaginal fistula in Crohn’s disease. Int J Colorectal
Dis 5:12-14 Fry RD, Shomesh EI, Kodner IS, Timmcke A (1989) Techniques
and results in the management of anal and perianal Crohn’s
disease. Surg Gynaecol Obstet 168:42-48 Gagliardi G, Pescatori M (2007) Clinical and functional results
after tailored surgery for rectovaginal fistula. Perineology
26:78-81 Gagliardi G, Pescatori M, Altomare DF et al (2008) Results, out-
come predictors, and complications after stapled transanal rec-
tal resection for obstructed defecation. Dis Colon Rectum
51:186-195 García-Olmo D, García-Arranz M, García LG et al (2003) Au-
tologous stem cell transplantation for treatment of recto-
vaginal fistula in perianal Crohn’s disease: a new cell-based
therapy. Int J Colorectal Dis 18:451-454
96
4 Rectovaginal Fistulae
Giordano A, della Corte M (2008) Non-operative management
of a rectovaginal fistula complicating stapled haemorrhoidec­tomy. Int J Colorectal Dis 23:727-728
Given FT Jr (1970) Rectovaginal fistula. A review of 20 years’
experience in a community hospital. Am J Obstet Gynecol 108:41-46
Gonsalves S, Sagar P, Lengyel J et al (2009) Assessment of the
efficacy of the rectovaginal button fistula plug for the treat­ment of ileal pouch-vaginal and rectovaginal fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 52:1877-1881
Hannaway CD, Hull TL (2008) Current considerations in the man-
agement of rectovaginal fistula from Crohn’s disease. Col­orectal Dis 10:747-755
Hull TL, El-Gazzaz G, Gurland B et al (2011) Surgeons should
not hesitate to perform episioproctotomy for rectovaginal fis­tula secondary to cryptoglandular or obstetrical origin. Dis Colon Rectum 54:54-59
Ijaiya MA, Mai AM, Aboyeji AP et al (2009) Rectovaginal fis-
tula following sexual intercourse: a case report. Ann Afr Med 8:59-60
Jalim SL, McKinnon AO (2010) Surgical correction of rectovagi-
nal fistula in mares and subsequent fertility. Aust Vet J 88:211-214
Kaymakcioglu N, Yagci G, Can MF et al (2006) An unusual com-
plication of the use of stapler after Hartmann’s procedure. West Afr J Med 25:289-291
Lee RC, Rotmensch J (2004) Rectovaginal radiation fistula re-
pair using an obturator fasciocutaneous thigh flap. Gynecol Oncol 94:277-282
Lefèvre JH, Bretagnol F, Maggiori L et al (2009) Operative re-
sults and quality of life after gracilis muscle transposition for recurrent rectovaginal fistula. Dis Colon Rectum 52:1290­1295
Lowry AC, Thorson AG, Rothenberger DA, Goldberg SM (1988)
Repair of simple rectovaginal fistulas. Influence of previous repairs. Dis Colon Rectum 31:676-678
Marchesa P, Hull TL, Fazio VW (1998) Advancement sleeve flaps
for treatment of severe perianal Crohn’s disease. Br J Surg 85:1695-1698
McDonald PJ, Bona R, Cohen CR (2004) Rectovaginal fistula af-
ter stapled haemorrhoidopexy. Colorectal Dis 6:64-65; Com­ment on: Colorectal Dis. 2003; 5:304-310
McNevin MS, Lee PY, Bax TW (2007) Martius flap: an adjunct
for repair of complex, low rectovaginal fistula. Am J Surg 193:597-599
Mirnezami AH, Gonsalves S, Gatt M et al (2009) Ileal pouch-
vaginal fistula: treatment with the new Surgisis Biodesign fis­tula plug. Tech Coloproctol 13:259-260
Mitalas LE, Gosselink MP, Oom DM et al (2009) Required
length of follow-up after transanal advancement flap repair of high transsphincteric fistulas. Colorectal Dis 11:726-728
Neely DT, Minford EJ (2011) Nicorandil-induced rectovaginal
fistula. Am J Obstet Gynecol epub ahead of print
Onodera H, Nagayama S, Kohmoto I et al (2003) Novel surgi-
cal repair with bilateral gluteus muscle patching for in­tractable rectovaginal fistula. Tech Coloproctol 7:198-202
Oom DM, Gosselink MP, Van Dijl VR et al (2006) Puborectal
sling interposition for the treatment of rectovaginal fistulas. Tech Coloproctol 10:125-130
Penninckx F, Moneghini D, D’Hoore A et al (2001) Success
and failure after repair of rectovaginal fistula in Crohn’s
disease: analysis of prognostic factors. Colorectal Dis
3:406-411 Pescatori M (2011) Ascessi, fistole anali e retto-vaginali. Springer,
Milan Pescatori M, Dodi G, Salafia C et al (2005) Rectovaginal fistu-
la after double-stapled transanal rectotomy (STARR) for ob-
structed defaecation. Int J Colorectal Dis 20:83-85 Pescatori M, Anastasio G, Bottini C et al (1992) New grading and
scoring for anal incontinence. Evaluation of 335 patients. Dis
Colon Rectum 35:482-487 Pinto RA, Peterson TV, Shawki S et al (2010) Are there predic-
tors of outcome following rectovaginal fistula repair? Dis
Colon Rectum 53:1240-1247 Rabau M, Zmora O, Tulchinsky H et al (2006) Recto-vagi-
nal/urethral fistula: repair with gracilis muscle transposi-
tion. Acta Chir Iugosl 53:81-84 Rex JC Jr, Khubchandani IT (1992) Rectovaginal fistula: com-
plication of low anterior resection. Dis Colon Rectum 35: 354-
356 Ruffolo C, Scarpa M, Bassi N et al (2010) A systematic review
on advancement flaps for rectovaginal fistula in Crohn’s dis-
ease: transrectal vs transvaginal approach. Colorectal Dis
12:1183-1191 Ruffolo C, Penninckx F, Van Assche G et al (2009) Outcome of
surgery for rectovaginal fistula due to Crohn’s disease. Br J
Surg 96:1190-1195 Ruiz D, Bashankaev B, Speranza J et al (2008) Graciloplasty for
rectourethral, rectovaginal and rectovesical fistulas: tech-
nique overview, pitfalls and complications. Tech Coloproc-
tol 12:277-281 Sathappan S, Rica MA (2006) Pudendal thigh flap for repair of
rectovaginal fistula. Med J Malaysia 61:355-357 Shelton AA, Welton ML (2006) Transperineal repair of persist-
ent rectovaginal fistulas using an acellular cadaveric dermal
graft (AlloDerm). Dis Colon Rectum 49:1454-1457 Stone JM, Goldberg SM (1990)The endorectal advancement flap
procedure. Int J Colorectal Dis 5:232-235 Schouten WR, Oom DM (2009) Rectal sleeve advancement for
the treatment of persistent rectovaginal fistulas. Tech Colo-
proctol 13:289-294 Schwandner O, Fuerst A (2009) Preliminary results on efficacy
in closure of trans-sphincteric and rectovaginal fistulas as-
sociated with Crohn’s disease using new biomaterials. Surg
Innov 16:162-168 Singhal SR, Nanda S, Singhal SK (2007) Sexual intercourse: an
unusual cause of rectovaginal fistula. Eur J Obstet Gynecol
Reprod Biol 131:243-244 Tañag MA, Kubo T, Yano K et al (2004) Simple repair of com-
plex rectovaginal fistulas. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand
Surg 38:121-124 Tancer ML, Lasser D, Rosenblum N (1990) Rectovaginal fistu-
la or perineal and anal sphincter disruption, or both, after vagi-
nal delivery. Surg Gynecol Obstet 171:43-46 Tsang CB, Madoff RD, Wong WD et al (1998) Anal sphincter
integrity and function influences outcome in rectovaginal fis-
tula repair. Dis Colon Rectum 41:1141-1146 Ulrich D, Roos J, Jakse G et al (2009) Gracilis muscle interpo-
sition for the treatment of recto-urethral and rectovaginal fis-
tulas: a retrospective analysis of 35 cases. J Plast Reconstr
Aesthet Surg 62:352-356 Vavra P, Dostalik J, Vavrova M et al (2009) Transanal endo-
Suggested Readings
97
scopic microsurgery: a novel technique for the repair of be­nign rectovaginal fistula. Surgeon. 7:126-127
Yodonawa S, Ogawa I, Yoshida S et al (2010) Rectovaginal fis-
tula after low anterior resection for rectal cancer using a double stapling technique. Case Rep Gastroenterol 4:224-228
Zimmerman DD, Briel JW, Gosselink MP et al (2001) Anocu-
taneous advancement flap repair of transsphincteric fistulas.
Dis Colon Rectum 44:1474-1480 Zimmermann MS, Hoffmann M, Hildebrand P et al (2011) Sur-
gical repair of rectovaginal fistulas—a challenge. Int J Col-
orectal Dis 26:817:819 Zmora O, Tulchinsky H, Gur E et al (2006) Gracilis muscle
transposition for fistulas between the rectum and urethra or
vagina. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1316-1321