Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_1137_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Foreword
- •Preface
- •Acknowledgements
- •1 Anal Fissure
- •1.1 Introduction
- •1.3 Anal Incontinence
- •1.4 What Should Be Done if Incontinence Develops?
- •1.5 Anal Sepsis
- •1.7 Tricks of the Trade
- •1.8 An Unforgettable Complication
- •Summary
- •Suggested Readings
- •2 Hemorrhoids
- •2.1 Introduction
- •2.2 Surgical Complications After Manual Hemorrhoidectomy (Ferguson and Milligan-Morgan Procedures): Live from the Operating Room
- •1.6 Suture Dehiscence
- •2.3 THD/DGHAL and Mucopexy (Doppler-guided, Laser-assisted)
- •2.4 Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy (PPH)
- •2.4.1 Hemorrhage
- •2.4.2 Other Complications
- •2.4.6 Rectal Inclusion Cysts
- •2.4.7 Total Obliteration of the Rectal Lumen
- •2.4.8 Rectal Diverticulum or Rectal Pocket Syndrome
- •2.4.9 Rectovaginal Fistulae
- •2.4.11 Dysplasia and Cancer
- •2.4.12 Retro-rectal Hematoma
- •2.4.13 Hemoperitoneum
- •2.4.15 Rectal Perforation and Pelvic Sepsis
- •2.4.16 Thrombosis of the Inferior Vena Cava
- •2.5 Complications After Other Operations
- •2.5.1 Semi-open or Semi-closed Hemorrhoidectomy
- •2.5.2 Farag Suturing of Internal Hemorrhoids
- •2.5.3 Hussein’s Manual Hemorrhoidopexy
- •2.5.5 Parks’ Submucosal Hemorrhoidectomy
- •2.5.6 Coagulation of Hemorrhoids
- •2.6 Treating the Complications
- •2.6.1 Pain
- •2.6.2 Urinary Retention
- •2.6.3 Hemorrhage
- •2.6.4 Fecaloma
- •2.6.5 Thrombosed External Hemorrhoids
- •2.6.6 Anal or Rectal Stenosis
- •2.6.7 Anal Fissure
- •2.6.8 Abscess or Fistula
- •2.6.9 Skin Tags
- •2.6.10 Anal Incontinence
- •2.6.11 Severe Anal Sepsis
- •2.6.12 Fournier’s Gangrene
- •2.6.13 Unusual Complications after PPH
- •2.7 Tricks of the Trade
- •2.8 Two Unforgettable Complications
- •2.8.1 Case Number One
- •2.8.2 Case Number Two
- •Summary
- •Suggested Readings
- •3 Anal Abscesses and Fistulae
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.2 Postoperative Bleeding
- •3.3 Iatrogenic Fistula
- •3.6 The Prevention of Postoperative Anal Incontinence
- •3.7 The Management of Postoperative Anal Incontinence
- •3.9 Tricks of the Trade
- •3.10 An Unforgettable Complication
- •Summary
- •Suggested Readings
- •4 Rectovaginal Fistulae
- •4.1 Introduction
- •4.2 Types of Operations and Postoperative Complications
- •4.3 Bleeding and Dyspareunia
- •4.3.1 Bleeding
- •4.3.2 Dyspareunia
- •4.4 Local Sepsis and Suture Dehiscence
- •4.5 Re-interventions
- •4.6 Drains
- •4.7 Fecal Incontinence
- •4.8 An Unforgettable Complication
- •Summary
- •Suggested Readings
- •5 Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal Sinus
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.2 Types of Operations
- •5.3 Postoperative Bleeding
- •5.4 Local Sepsis and Suture Dehiscence
- •5.5 The Prevention of Local Sepsis
- •5.7 Sinus Pilonidalis Associated with Anal Fistula or Abscess
- •5.8 An Unforgettable Complication
- •Summary
- •Suggested Readings
- •6.7 Two Unforgettable Complications
- •6.7.1 Case Number One
- •6.7.2 Case Number Two
- •Summary
- •Suggested Readings
- •6 Tumors of the Rectum and Anus
- •6.1 Introduction
- •6.2 TEM or Transanal Endoscopic Mucosectomy
- •6.3 Transanal Submucosal Excision According to Parks: “Live Surgery”
- •6.4 Other Transanal Techniques
- •6.4.1 Through the Rigid Sigmoidoscope
- •6.4.2 Using an endoGIA or a Urologic Resectoscope
- •6.5 Non-transanal Local Excision
- •6.5.1 The York-Mason Procedure
- •6.5.2 Kraske Operation
- •6.5.3 Intersphincteric Resection
- •7 Anal Condylomata and Anorectal Stricture
- •7.1 Introduction
- •7.2 Complications After Surgery for Anal Condylomata
- •7.4 Complications After Surgery for Rectal Stricture
- •7.5 “Live Surgery”: The Prevention of Postoperative Complications After Anoplasty
- •7.6 A Trick of the Trade
- •7.7 An Unforgettable Complication
- •Summary
- •Suggested Readings
- •8 Obstructed Defecation (OD) and Related Diseases
- •8.1 Introduction
- •8.2 Our Relevant Complications Following Surgery for Obstructed Defecation
- •8.3 Postoperative Complications After Internal Delorme
- •8.5 The Prevention of Postoperative Incontinence
- •8.6 The Treatment of Postoperative Incontinence
- •8.7 Postoperative Complications After STARR and Transtar
- •8.8 Other Operations for Rectocele Using a Transanal Stapler
- •8.8.1 Circular Stapler
- •8.8.2 Linear Stapler
- •8.9 Postoperative Complications After Rectocele Repair Using Prosthetic Meshes
- •8.11 Operating on a Patient with Solitary Rectal Ulcer Syndrome (SRUS) and Obstructed Defecation
- •8.12 Two Unforgettable Complications
- •8.12.1 Case Number One
- •8.12.2 Case Number Two
- •Summary
- •Suggested Readings
- •9 Fecal Incontinence
- •9.1 Introduction
- •9.3 Anterior Levatorplasty
- •9.4 Sphincter Reconstruction
- •9.5 Sacral Neuromodulation
- •9.5.1 Radiofrequency Energy
- •9.6.1 Graciloplasty
- •9.6.2 Gluteoplasty
- •9.7 Artificial Sphincter
- •9.8 Bulking Agents
- •9.9 Puborectalis Sling and Silicone Ring
- •9.9.1 Puborectalis Sling
- •9.9.2 Silicone Ring
- •9.10 Trick of the Trade
- •9.11 Unforgettable Complications
- •9.11.1 The First Five
- •9.11.2 The Last One
- •Summary
- •Suggested Readings
- •10 External Rectal Prolapse
- •10.1 Introduction
- •10.4 Complications After the Altemeier Procedure (Perineal Proctosigmoidectomy)
- •10.5 Complications After Other Procedures
- •10.5.2 Transvaginal Sacrospinous Rectopexy
- •10.5.3 Manual Transanal Rectal Prolapse Excision
- •10.6 Circular Stapled Transanal Prolapsectomy
- •10.7 Transanal Rectal Prolapsectomy Using the Contour Stapling Device
- •10.9 An Unforgettable Complication
- •Summary
- •Suggested Readings
- •Subject Index

88
Table 4.1 Surgical procedures for RVF and the most frequent postoperative complications, as reported in the literature (abdomi-
nal procedures are excluded)
Operation Author and year Reported complication
Transanal route
Rectal advancement flap Goldberg, 1990 Suture dehiscence
Hoexter, 1990 Sepsis and dehiscence
Lowry, 1992 Suture dehiscence
Marchesa, 1998 Sepsis and dehiscence
TEM plasty Darwood, 2008
Surgisis plug Gonsalves, 2009 Plug detachment
Perineal route
Lay-open Belt 1969, Anal incontinence
Francois, 1990 Anal incontinence
Fistulotomy and layered suture Hudson, 1977 Rectal bleeding
Puborectalis muscle interposition Oom, 2006 Local sepsis
Excision, suture, and sphincteroplasty Gagliardi, 2007 Suture dehiscence
Pinto, 2010 Dehiscence, bleeding
Bulbocavernosus muscle interposition Cui, 2009 Dyspareunia
Graciloplasty Lefèvre, 2009 Loss of libido
Gluteoplasty Lefèvre, 2009 Dyspareunia
Transvaginal route
Inversion and layered closure Given, 1970 Suture dehiscence
Episiotomy and layered closure Tancer, 1990 Bleeding, cellulitis
Vaginal advancement flap Ruffolo, 2009 Suture dehiscence
Transcoccygeal route
Rectal advancement flap Schouten, 2009
a
Only one case.
b
All complex RVF recurring after previous repair.
a
b
4 Rectovaginal Fistulae
Suture dehiscence
4.3 Bleeding and Dyspareunia
4.3.1 Bleeding
Bleeding rarely occurs after RVF repair (Tancer et
al., 1990) but when it does it may be dramatic and
require emergency re-intervention, as discussed at
the end of the chapter. It is likely to be successfully managed by suturing the bleeding area, but may
also require a diverting stoma. In a series of 184
patients treated at the Cleveland Clinic in Florida,
Pinto et al. (2010) reported three cases of severe
bleeding in which re-operation was required.
4.3.2 Dyspareunia
Dyspareunia may follow anterior levatorplasty or,
more often, puborectalis muscle interposition. It is
due to the fact that the bulk of the muscle tissue
sutured at the level of the rectovaginal septum can
hinder sexual intercourse. Dyspareunia has been
also reported in association with either a loss or a
reduction of libido following graciloplasty for
recurrent RVF (Lefèvre, 2009). This complication
is prevented by a rectal flap advancement performed via the transcoccygeal route, as reported by
Schouten and Oom (2009). Only one of the nine
patients operated upon by Cui (2009) using bulbocavernosus muscle interposition complained of
dyspareunia after surgery.
4.4 Local Sepsis and Suture Dehiscence
This complication has occurred in 10% of our
patients after RVF repair (Gagliardi and Pescatori,
2007). Similar findings were reported by Pinto et

4.3 Bleeding and Dyspareunia
89
Fig. 4.2 Surgical procedure of reverse suturing after excision
of a transvaginal high rectovaginal fistula (black). The
reversed stitches, translocated to the rectal side, prevent
problems with the sutures and facilitate an effective plasty
al. (2010) in patients treated at the Cleveland Clinic
in Florida, with sepsis and suture breakdown occurring in 13 out of 125 patients. When confined to the
bowel, the dehiscence may either heal spontaneously following the application of local healing ointments/gels or in response to systemic antibiotics.
Alternatively, treatment may require a diverting
sigmoidostomy, with or without re-suture of the
dehiscent wound, depending on its dimension and
provided that the local infection has subsided.
A method to prevent (or minimize the risk of)
anastomotic breakdown when performing complex
procedures, e.g., a Martius flap or layered closure
with sphincter reconstruction, is to prolong the
administration of antibiotics beyond the typical
antibiotic prophylaxis and to give the patient a
course of intravenous feeding with enough calories
to favor tissue healing. Alternatively, it may be
preferable to perform a temporary diverting stoma,
usually a sigmoidostomy, which does not increase
the risk of RVF recurrence. The latter may be carried out to prevent fecal contamination in more
complex repairs, such as the inverted layered closure with a rectal advancement flap (Fig. 4.2).
According to Wexner (in Pinto et al., 2010),
heavy smokers, as previously reported by the
Schouten group for anal fistula surgery (see Chap.
3), are at risk for anastomotic dehiscence, as
smoke stimulates the production of catecholamines
and thus causes vasoconstriction, with the
decreased blood supply in turn affecting the healing properties of the tissues. Crohn’s disease is
another condition that increases the risk of suture
breakdown after RVF repair, with a dehiscence rate
of 60% reported in these patients by Lowry and
Goldberg in 1992. Fry and Kodner (1989) reported
a much lower dehiscence rate of 20% in their
Crohn’s patients. Interestingly, Garcia Olmo et al.
(2003) suggested the therapeutic use of stem cells
in patients with RVF and Crohn’s diseases.
The construction of a flap offers several advantages for patients with anal continence, which is
more often seen in patients with Crohn’s disease.
These patients may have a less compliant, infla med rectum and a reduced stool consistency due to
diarrheal episodes. By carrying out a flap, one may
avoid the formation of a perineal wound, possibly
affecting the sensory component of anal continence, and an anal deformity, which is likely to
favor postoperative soiling. The question then
becomes whether the surgical strategy should
include a vaginal or a rectal flap. After reviewing
the literature, Ruffolo et al. (2010) recommended
the vaginal flap, the main reason being that the
construction of a rectal flap requires a transanal
procedure with stretching of the sphincter.
Regarding the need for a stoma, Marchesa et al.
(1998) preferred the use of a diverting colostomy

90
when dealing with Crohn’s RVF in patients treated
at the Cleveland Clinic in Ohio.
Darwood and Borley (2008) successfully treated a patient with a rectovaginal fistula following
an anterior resection of the rectum using TEM. As
the latter technique is minimally invasive, it is less
likely than conventional procedures to cause postoperative complications. However, this remains to
be confirmed in larger series.
4.5 Re-interventions
A surgeon dealing with RVF patients should be
prepared to re-operate, mostly due to dehiscences
or recurrences. About one-third of RVF patients
need more than one operation to be cured, underlining the importance of alternative procedures, as
noted above.
The crucial point is that a patient who needs a
re-intervention is at greater risk of complications
and failures, namely, local sepsis, suture dehiscences, bleeding, and incontinence. In fact, the
patient’s tissues are less vascularized, the anal
sphincters are weaker, etc., due to the previous
operation. This is true also for other proctological
diseases, such as hemorrhoids (see Chap. 2). It is
known that re-interventions for either complicated
or recurrent hemorrhoids, namely, after procedures
for prolapsing hemorrhoids, are more likely to
cause postoperative bleeding (Brusciano et al.,
2004). Based on these considerations, surgically
treated tissues are less vascularized and surgically
treated sphincters are weaker and more prone to
causing anal incontinence. Schouten and Oom
(2009) recommended the avoidance of a perineal/transanal/transvaginal route in these cases,
instead re-operating by another approach, through
tissues with a good vascular supply and leaving
intact the anal sphincters. They operated on a number of patients with recurrent RVF via a transsacral approach, with successful outcome. There
was only one local infection in eight cases managed with a mucosal advancement flap. It should
be noted, however, that most of the RVF in this
Dutch series were post-obstetric, i.e., the patients
with the best prognosis. The local sepsis rate was
as high as 42% after another type of RVF repair,
interposition of the puborectalis muscle, carried
out by the same authors (Oom et al., 2006).
4 Rectovaginal Fistulae
4.6 Drains
Beck and Wexner (1992) recommend the use of a
drain in repairs of high RVF with long tracts, in
order to decrease the risk of sepsis and dehiscences. The Surgisis plug (Biodesign, Cook
Medical, Bloomington, USA) has been used for
the management of RVF, but it was displaced due
to suture dehiscence in 42% of the patients in one
series, with the fistula tract open within 4 weeks
and requiring the implantation of another plug
(Gonsalves et al., 2009). However, infection did
not occur in any of the patients operated on by
these surgeons.
4.7 Fecal Incontinence
Postoperative fecal incontinence was a complaint
in 15% of the patients I operated upon for RVF
(Gagliardi and Pescatori, 2007). When graded
according to our validated system (Pescatori et al.,
1992), incontinence was due to liquid stool in all
cases, occurring at least once a week (B2, score 4)
in two-thirds and occasionally (B1, score 3) in
one-third of the cases. However, some of these
patients already suffered from incontinence prior
to surgery, due to either diarhea or, more rarely, an
inflamed rectal reservoir (in cases of Crohn’s disease) or an obstetric injury to the anal sphincters.
In an earlier report Belt (1969) found that fecal
incontinence always occurred after laying open
RVF. Francois et al. (1990) reported fecal incontinence in three out of nine surgically treated
patients. I carried out a fistulotomy in a 35-yearold patient with Crohn’s disease. While she
remained continent, the tract was very low, anovulvar rather than rectovaginal. The risk of postoperative incontinence may be minimized by using a
tailored approach, i.e., avoiding transanal repair,
which is likely to stretch the anal sphincters, in
patients with weak pelvic floor. The use of a
Martius flap, transposing the bulbocavernosus
muscle, might be a good option in these patients
(Cui, 2009). Alternatively, as suggested by Lowry
in Beck and Wexner’s book (1993), anterior
sphincter reconstruction may be required in case of
injured anal sphincters. Annaway and Hull (2008)
reported good results using this procedure, and a

4.7 Fecal Incontinence
91
a
h
m
qrs t uv
bc d ef g
ij k l
nop
Fig. 4.3 Sphincter-sparing procedure, aimed at preventing potoperative incontinence, in a patient with recurrent anal and rectovagi-
nal fistula a Patient in the lithotomy position. On the left: external opening of a vulvar fistula (images by N. Clemente); b probing
of the fistulous track; c lay-open of a chronic abscess at the site of a Bartolini’s gland; d the cavity is completely laid-open after the
partial division of both the bulbo-cavernosus and the superficial transverse muscle of the perineum; e the cavity is curetted with a
Volkman spoon; f the underlying recto-vaginal fistula is probed; g a seton is inserted in the fistula; h the external orifice of a concomitant anal fistula is found and the small perianal abscess is curetted; i the horse-shoe anterior perianal fistula is probed; j the fistula is laid-open, dividing just a few fibers of the subcutaneous part of the external sphincter, anteriorly; k the fistulotomy has been
carried out (arrow); l anal trimming; m the recto-vaginal fistula is excised; n it will be sent for histological examination; o a gauze
soaked with Betadine is inserted in the vagina; p endoanal view: a Beak Sapimed anoscope has been inserted and a rectal mucosal
advancement flap is prepared, injecting adrenaline and saline 1:200,000 under the submucosal layer; q vaginal aspect: the post-fistulectomy cavity is shown; r suture of the vaginal wall: 1) reconstruction of the bulbo-cavernosus muscle using 2/0 vicryl; s 2) the
superficial layer of the vaginal wall has been sutured; t endoanal view: the rectal flap is sutured without tension to the subcutaneous
part of the external sphincter, to cover the surgical defect in the lower rectum; u end of the surgical procedure; v two months later,
the wounds are healed and the patient, in the Sims position, is fully continent
similar positive experience was obtained in our
series, as noted above.
Anal and vaginal ultrasound (US) may be helpful to detect anterior occult lesions of the external
sphincter in patients who do not present with clinically evident anal incontinence. When anal US and
manometry are not available, a careful anamnesis
and physical examination will allow surgeons to
easily identify patients at risk for postoperative
incontinence, i.e., those who are multiparous, have
a perineal descent and a short anal canal, suffer
from irritable bowel syndrome, and have already
undergone proctological surgery. However, an
operation aimed at preserving anal sphincters may
be carried out even when a fistula-in-ano is associated to RVF, as illustrated in Fig. 4.3.

92
4.8 An Unforgettable Complication
The patient is a friendly, smiling, but rather nervous
42-year-old woman who came to my office accompanied by her husband and daughter. One year
before, in 2001, she had undergone a STARR procedure, performed for obstructed defecation, but she
was still constipated, with the constant need to
strain, unable to empty her bowel, and spending
hours at the toilet, self-digitating. During digital
exploration, when I asked her to strain, I clearly felt
a paradoxical contraction of the puborectalis muscle. Pushing my finger towards the vagina, I also
felt a modest rectocele. The patient had two vaginal
deliveries, which had caused the rectocele. She then
had undergone a stapled rectotomy, aimed at its correction, but, due to the repeated excessive straining
against a contracted puborectalis, it had, not surprisingly, recurred. At proctoscopy, a prevalently anterior rectal internal mucosal prolapse was detectable
that almost reached the anal verge on straining. At
this point, the reader might ask how all this relates
to RVF, but the answer will soon become clear.
“Your main problem is the non-relaxing muscle,” I
said to the anxious woman, showing her the contracted puborectalis on the screen of the US device.
“You need a course of pelvic floor exercises.” A few
months later, after seeing a physiotherapist, she
returned for a follow-up exam, still constipated
despite several sessions of biofeedback training.
The muscle tended to relax but the rectocele and the
prolapse of course persisted. The woman was even
more distraught and agitated. She pleaded for a
repair operation, to which I did not agree. But when
I saw her again, 2 months later, she was still very
upset and said that her obstructed defecation had
worsened. I agreed that surgery was necessary and
scheduled her for a Sarles mucosectomy to repair
both the rectocele and the prolapse. Three weeks
later, I performed the operation, which was technically demanding due to the fibrosis of the lower rectum caused by the previous operation. On postoperative day two, the patient had her first, albeit
painful, bowel movement, with some pus discharge.
Her temperature rose to 39°C and she was very
uncomfortable. Two days later, at digital exploration, I felt a small gap in the rectoanal suture;
moreover, the patients told me that she felt air coming out through the vagina. “The same feeling I had
4 Rectovaginal Fistulae
sometimes after the STARR operation” she added.
“But you never reported this symptom to me
before!” I said. “Well, doctor, you never asked me if
I felt a loss of air through the vagina!” she replied.
I discussed with her the need for re-intervention,
explaining that in case of suture breakdown and
RVF, a diverting stoma should have been carried
out, but she strongly refused a possible stoma formation.
What did I find? What did I do in the operating
theatre? Please provide your own hypotheses.
The patient was returned to the operating theatre,
with the findings shown in Fig. 4.4. A Foley
catheter was positioned in the bladder and the anal
canal was gently stretched with a dilator. The rectoanal anastomosis of the Sarles (a type of anterior
Delorme) appeared to be almost completely dehiscent. There was tissue ischemia, pus discharge, and
a high fistula was clearly detectable, with a wide
communication between the lower rectum and the
vagina. After a complex perineal, transanal, and
transvaginal repair, as a stoma could not be fashioned due to the patient’s refusal, a course of parenteral nutrition was started and the bowel confined
to prevent fecal contamination of the sutures. One
week later, the patient was doing well, with the
wounds sutures apparently healed, but as she was
not allowed to eat and had to stay in bed, she
became increasingly agitated, until one afternoon
she violently pulled out the Foley catheter, with the
balloon inflated, causing bleeding from the perineum. Despite perineal compression with gauze,
the hemorrhage did not stop. It was late in the
evening, the patient was pale and tachycardic, and it
was not possible to admit her to the operating room
to administer anesthesia and suture the bleeding
site; therefore, I had her transferred to a betterequipped, larger hospital, where an urgent reoperation was carried out, with suturing of the bleeding
area, i.e., part of the surgical wound at the vaginal
side. In addition, a diverting colostomy was performed. The patient was discharged one week later.
The stoma was closed after a few months. After 8
years, she still suffers from obstructed defecation.
In conclusion: postoperative bleeding is rare but
may be dramatic after RVF repair. And never operate on a very anxious patient with anismus and
obstructed defecation.

4.8 An Unforgettable Complication
Fig. 4.4 a “Unforgettable complication:” a mildly symptomatic
rectovaginal fistula, after STARR, that usually becomes clinically evident as a result of anastomotic dehiscence for local sepsis after Delorme prolapsectomy. At re-operation, a fistula excision with levatorplasty was performed. The patient refused a covering stoma and instead underwent peripheral total parenteral nutrition. A second operation became necessary because of an acute hemorrhage from the surgical wound, as a result of local trauma, i.e., forced removal of the Foley catheter by the patient, who
suffered from high levels of anxiety
93
Fig. 4.4 b Transverse incision between the rectum and vagina.
The subcutaneous portion of the external sphincter is seen
below and the superficial transverse perineal muscles (pink)
above. The patient is in the lithotomy position
Fig. 4.4 c The posterior distal portion of the vagina is intact,
with the vaginal orifice of the fistula situated above
Fig. 4.4 d Vertical incision on the vaginal side

94
Fig. 4.4 e Traction stitches are placed to better view the opera-
tive field, which, from anus to vagina, includes the subcutaneous portion of the external sphincter, the transverse superficial and deep perineal muscles, and the bulbocavernosus
muscle
4 Rectovaginal Fistulae
Fig. 4.4 f Clamp tips are inserted in the fistula orifice
Fig. 4.4 g Both lateral branches of the puborectal muscle are
placed on the medial side and sutured, performing an anterior
levatorplasty, to interpose vital and well vascularized tissue between the rectum and vagina
Fig. 4.4 h Cutaneous plasty was performed to create more
space between the anus and the vulva

Summary
Fig. 4.4 i The surgical wound is incompletely sutured, to pre-
vent sepsis. The patient refused a covering stoma. Seven days
later, bleeding from the depth of the surgical wound occurred,
requiring an urgent hemostatic suture, followed by a diverting
colostomy that was closed after a few months (from Pescatori,
2011)
Summary
The most feared complication after RVF repair is
local sepsis, with suture dehiscence, which may
occur in around 10% of patients. It may be prevented, or its consequences minimized, by performing a diverting stoma at the end of the fistula
repair. Dehiscences are more prone to occur (up to
40%) in patients with Crohn’s disease or in those
with recurrent RVF, who are operated on with a
rectal advancement flap. Postoperative bleeding is
rare, but may require re-intervention. Dyspareunia
may follow levatorplasty and graciloplasty.
Fecal incontinence is more likely in patients
operated upon via a transanal route, due to excessive stretching of the sphincters, but may be prevented by means of sphincter reconstruction following fistulectomy in patients with weak pelvic
floor muscles. Alternatively, a transvaginal or a
trans-sacral approach may be used.
The best clinical and functional results are
achieved in low post-obstetric RVF, as the rectum is
healthy and the patient is young. Patients with Crohn’s
or post-radiation RVF have the worst prognosis.
95
The surgeon who deals with RVF should be a
specialist able to perform more than one procedure, as approximately one-third of the patients
require repeated interventions to achieve cure.
Suggested Readings
Athanasiadis S, Yazigi R, Köhler A et al (2007) Recovery rates
and functional results after repair for rectovaginal fistula in
Crohn’s disease: a comparison of different techniques. Int J
Colorectal Dis 22:1051-1060
Bassi R, Rademacher J, Savoia A (2006) Rectovaginal fistula af-
ter STARR procedure complicated by haematoma of the
posterior vaginal wall: report of a case. Tech Coloproctol
10:361-363
Belt RL Jr (1969) Repair of anorectal vaginal fistula utilizing seg-
mental advancement of the internal sphincter muscle. Dis
Colon Rectum 12:99-104
Chu M, Crist H, Zaino RJ (2010) Adenocarcinoma arising in a
rectovaginal fistula in Crohn’s disease. Int J Gynecol Pathol
29:497-500
Cui L, Chen D, Chen W et al (2009) Interposition of vital bul-
bocavernosus graft in the treatment of both simple and re-
current rectovaginal fistulas. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:1255-
1259
Darwood RJ, Borley NR (2008) TEM: an alternative method for
the repair of benign recto-vaginal fistulae. Colorectal Dis
10:619-620
de Parades V, Dahmani Z, Blanchard P et al (2010) Endorectal
advancement flap with muscular plication: a modified tech-
nique for rectovaginal fistula repair. Colorectal Dis 13:921-
925
Devesa JM, Devesa M, Velasco GR et al (2007) Benign recto-
vaginal fistulas: management and results of a personal series.
Tech Coloproctol 11:128-134
El-Gazzaz G, Hull TL, Mignanelli E et al (2010) Obstetric and
cryptoglandular rectovaginal fistulas: long-term surgical out-
come; quality of life; and sexual function. J Gastrointest
Surg 14:1758-1763
Ellis CN (2008) Outcomes after repair of rectovaginal fistulas us-
ing bioprosthetics. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1084-1088
Francois Y, Descos L, Vignal J (1990) Conservative treatment of
low rectovaginal fistula in Crohn’s disease. Int J Colorectal
Dis 5:12-14
Fry RD, Shomesh EI, Kodner IS, Timmcke A (1989) Techniques
and results in the management of anal and perianal Crohn’s
disease. Surg Gynaecol Obstet 168:42-48
Gagliardi G, Pescatori M (2007) Clinical and functional results
after tailored surgery for rectovaginal fistula. Perineology
26:78-81
Gagliardi G, Pescatori M, Altomare DF et al (2008) Results, out-
come predictors, and complications after stapled transanal rec-
tal resection for obstructed defecation. Dis Colon Rectum
51:186-195
García-Olmo D, García-Arranz M, García LG et al (2003) Au-
tologous stem cell transplantation for treatment of recto-
vaginal fistula in perianal Crohn’s disease: a new cell-based
therapy. Int J Colorectal Dis 18:451-454

96
4 Rectovaginal Fistulae
Giordano A, della Corte M (2008) Non-operative management
of a rectovaginal fistula complicating stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Int J Colorectal Dis 23:727-728
Given FT Jr (1970) Rectovaginal fistula. A review of 20 years’
experience in a community hospital. Am J Obstet Gynecol
108:41-46
Gonsalves S, Sagar P, Lengyel J et al (2009) Assessment of the
efficacy of the rectovaginal button fistula plug for the treatment of ileal pouch-vaginal and rectovaginal fistulas. Dis
Colon Rectum 52:1877-1881
Hannaway CD, Hull TL (2008) Current considerations in the man-
agement of rectovaginal fistula from Crohn’s disease. Colorectal Dis 10:747-755
Hull TL, El-Gazzaz G, Gurland B et al (2011) Surgeons should
not hesitate to perform episioproctotomy for rectovaginal fistula secondary to cryptoglandular or obstetrical origin. Dis
Colon Rectum 54:54-59
Ijaiya MA, Mai AM, Aboyeji AP et al (2009) Rectovaginal fis-
tula following sexual intercourse: a case report. Ann Afr
Med 8:59-60
Jalim SL, McKinnon AO (2010) Surgical correction of rectovagi-
nal fistula in mares and subsequent fertility. Aust Vet J
88:211-214
Kaymakcioglu N, Yagci G, Can MF et al (2006) An unusual com-
plication of the use of stapler after Hartmann’s procedure.
West Afr J Med 25:289-291
Lee RC, Rotmensch J (2004) Rectovaginal radiation fistula re-
pair using an obturator fasciocutaneous thigh flap. Gynecol
Oncol 94:277-282
Lefèvre JH, Bretagnol F, Maggiori L et al (2009) Operative re-
sults and quality of life after gracilis muscle transposition for
recurrent rectovaginal fistula. Dis Colon Rectum 52:12901295
Lowry AC, Thorson AG, Rothenberger DA, Goldberg SM (1988)
Repair of simple rectovaginal fistulas. Influence of previous
repairs. Dis Colon Rectum 31:676-678
Marchesa P, Hull TL, Fazio VW (1998) Advancement sleeve flaps
for treatment of severe perianal Crohn’s disease. Br J Surg
85:1695-1698
McDonald PJ, Bona R, Cohen CR (2004) Rectovaginal fistula af-
ter stapled haemorrhoidopexy. Colorectal Dis 6:64-65; Comment on: Colorectal Dis. 2003; 5:304-310
McNevin MS, Lee PY, Bax TW (2007) Martius flap: an adjunct
for repair of complex, low rectovaginal fistula. Am J Surg
193:597-599
Mirnezami AH, Gonsalves S, Gatt M et al (2009) Ileal pouch-
vaginal fistula: treatment with the new Surgisis Biodesign fistula plug. Tech Coloproctol 13:259-260
Mitalas LE, Gosselink MP, Oom DM et al (2009) Required
length of follow-up after transanal advancement flap repair
of high transsphincteric fistulas. Colorectal Dis 11:726-728
Neely DT, Minford EJ (2011) Nicorandil-induced rectovaginal
fistula. Am J Obstet Gynecol epub ahead of print
Onodera H, Nagayama S, Kohmoto I et al (2003) Novel surgi-
cal repair with bilateral gluteus muscle patching for intractable rectovaginal fistula. Tech Coloproctol 7:198-202
Oom DM, Gosselink MP, Van Dijl VR et al (2006) Puborectal
sling interposition for the treatment of rectovaginal fistulas.
Tech Coloproctol 10:125-130
Penninckx F, Moneghini D, D’Hoore A et al (2001) Success
and failure after repair of rectovaginal fistula in Crohn’s
disease: analysis of prognostic factors. Colorectal Dis
3:406-411
Pescatori M (2011) Ascessi, fistole anali e retto-vaginali. Springer,
Milan
Pescatori M, Dodi G, Salafia C et al (2005) Rectovaginal fistu-
la after double-stapled transanal rectotomy (STARR) for ob-
structed defaecation. Int J Colorectal Dis 20:83-85
Pescatori M, Anastasio G, Bottini C et al (1992) New grading and
scoring for anal incontinence. Evaluation of 335 patients. Dis
Colon Rectum 35:482-487
Pinto RA, Peterson TV, Shawki S et al (2010) Are there predic-
tors of outcome following rectovaginal fistula repair? Dis
Colon Rectum 53:1240-1247
Rabau M, Zmora O, Tulchinsky H et al (2006) Recto-vagi-
nal/urethral fistula: repair with gracilis muscle transposi-
tion. Acta Chir Iugosl 53:81-84
Rex JC Jr, Khubchandani IT (1992) Rectovaginal fistula: com-
plication of low anterior resection. Dis Colon Rectum 35: 354-
356
Ruffolo C, Scarpa M, Bassi N et al (2010) A systematic review
on advancement flaps for rectovaginal fistula in Crohn’s dis-
ease: transrectal vs transvaginal approach. Colorectal Dis
12:1183-1191
Ruffolo C, Penninckx F, Van Assche G et al (2009) Outcome of
surgery for rectovaginal fistula due to Crohn’s disease. Br J
Surg 96:1190-1195
Ruiz D, Bashankaev B, Speranza J et al (2008) Graciloplasty for
rectourethral, rectovaginal and rectovesical fistulas: tech-
nique overview, pitfalls and complications. Tech Coloproc-
tol 12:277-281
Sathappan S, Rica MA (2006) Pudendal thigh flap for repair of
rectovaginal fistula. Med J Malaysia 61:355-357
Shelton AA, Welton ML (2006) Transperineal repair of persist-
ent rectovaginal fistulas using an acellular cadaveric dermal
graft (AlloDerm). Dis Colon Rectum 49:1454-1457
Stone JM, Goldberg SM (1990)The endorectal advancement flap
procedure. Int J Colorectal Dis 5:232-235
Schouten WR, Oom DM (2009) Rectal sleeve advancement for
the treatment of persistent rectovaginal fistulas. Tech Colo-
proctol 13:289-294
Schwandner O, Fuerst A (2009) Preliminary results on efficacy
in closure of trans-sphincteric and rectovaginal fistulas as-
sociated with Crohn’s disease using new biomaterials. Surg
Innov 16:162-168
Singhal SR, Nanda S, Singhal SK (2007) Sexual intercourse: an
unusual cause of rectovaginal fistula. Eur J Obstet Gynecol
Reprod Biol 131:243-244
Tañag MA, Kubo T, Yano K et al (2004) Simple repair of com-
plex rectovaginal fistulas. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand
Surg 38:121-124
Tancer ML, Lasser D, Rosenblum N (1990) Rectovaginal fistu-
la or perineal and anal sphincter disruption, or both, after vagi-
nal delivery. Surg Gynecol Obstet 171:43-46
Tsang CB, Madoff RD, Wong WD et al (1998) Anal sphincter
integrity and function influences outcome in rectovaginal fis-
tula repair. Dis Colon Rectum 41:1141-1146
Ulrich D, Roos J, Jakse G et al (2009) Gracilis muscle interpo-
sition for the treatment of recto-urethral and rectovaginal fis-
tulas: a retrospective analysis of 35 cases. J Plast Reconstr
Aesthet Surg 62:352-356
Vavra P, Dostalik J, Vavrova M et al (2009) Transanal endo-

Suggested Readings
97
scopic microsurgery: a novel technique for the repair of benign rectovaginal fistula. Surgeon. 7:126-127
Yodonawa S, Ogawa I, Yoshida S et al (2010) Rectovaginal fis-
tula after low anterior resection for rectal cancer using a
double stapling technique. Case Rep Gastroenterol 4:224-228
Zimmerman DD, Briel JW, Gosselink MP et al (2001) Anocu-
taneous advancement flap repair of transsphincteric fistulas.
Dis Colon Rectum 44:1474-1480
Zimmermann MS, Hoffmann M, Hildebrand P et al (2011) Sur-
gical repair of rectovaginal fistulas—a challenge. Int J Col-
orectal Dis 26:817:819
Zmora O, Tulchinsky H, Gur E et al (2006) Gracilis muscle
transposition for fistulas between the rectum and urethra or
vagina. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1316-1321
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
