Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3781_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
02.09.2026
Размер:
19 Мб
Скачать
330
https://t.me/medicina_free
is placed in the proximal IVC, and the return cannula is placed at the IVC/RA junc­tion. It is preferable to place the return outow cannula in the right femoral vein since the cannula may not reach the RA from the left femoral vein in larger patients.
Finally, a dual lumen bicaval cannula can be introduced from the right IJ, passing
through the RA with the tip positioned in the IVC.Deoxygenated blood is drained from the drainage ports which are located in the SVC and IVC and oxygenated blood is returned through the reinjection port which is carefully positioned at the RA and directed toward the tricuspid valve. The cannula must therefore be placed under both TEE and uoroscopic guidance to ensure the correct positioning of the various sideholes and to prevent catastrophic injury to the right heart. The dual lumen cannula offers various advantages including minimal recirculation, preven­tion of limb ischemia complications and allows patients to ambulate freely. However, the cannula is expensive and therefore may be best suited for patients who will require long-term V-V ECMO therapy and rehabilitation such as those awaiting lung transplant. Dual lumen cannulation is also more time consuming and therefore not recommended as rst line for an emergent cannulation.
Common to all forms of cannulation is meticulous avoidance of air in the ECMO
circuit using “wet to wet” connections and robust securing of cannula with multiple sutures to prevent inadvertent dislodgement. After cannulation, the ECMO circuit is appropriately connected ensuring no air in the lines. It is recommended that an “ECMO Initiation Checklist” be performed to ensure appropriate direction of tub­ing, adequate fresh gas supply, and appropriate levels of oxygen are conrmed. Support should be initiated slowly to minimize abrupt temperature shifts since rapid infusion of cold uid can cause the heart to brillate. Cannulation can trigger a vasodilatory response so vasopressors should be available to support the blood pres­sure. Conversely, correction of the respiratory acidosis/hypoxia may lead to rapid improvement in vasomotor tone and cardiac function, so close monitoring is essen­tial. Once ECMO support is established satisfactorily, ventilatory support should be weaned to lung protective settings to minimize further lung injury.
P. Moonsamy and J. Crowley
V-A ECMO [1, 4]
Cannulation for V-A ECMO can be achieved centrally (in the chest) or peripherally. Peripheral cannulation is much more expeditious since it does not require a ster­notomy and is therefore used in emergencies. Both open and percutaneous periph­eral techniques can be used to access the femoral vessels. The open cutdown technique has the advantage of higher success rate, easier method of ensuring limb perfusion, and potentially easier removal of the cannulas. Drawbacks include slower cannulation times, higher rates of bleeding, and infection. We favor ultrasound­guided percutaneous cannulation. In either strategy, the common femoral artery is accessed below the inguinal ligament but above the bifurcation of the supercial and deep femoral arteries. A cannula is placed using Seldinger technique. The venous drainage cannula is placed into the femoral vein below the inguinal ligament
29 Extra-Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation
https://t.me/medicina_free
with the tip located at the IVC/RA junction. The venous cannula can be placed on the same or contralateral side to the arterial cannula. Cannula size is determined by the vessel size/patient’s body surface area and by the goal ow. In general, 17Fr arterial cannulas and 25Fr venous drainage cannulas are used in average sized patients. When the femoral arterial vessels cannot be accessed, the axillary artery can be used as an alternate for the arterial return cannula, however this carries higher rates of bleeding complications. The carotid artery is also commonly used in pedi­atrics because it can be simply ligated with decannulation. This is not possible in adults.
Central cannulation is achieved via sternotomy and has the advantages of offer-
ing antegrade arterial ow which is more physiologic and therefore avoids North­South Syndrome (discussed below). The drainage cannula is placed directly into the right atrium, and the arterial cannula is placed antegrade into the aorta. Central cannulation carries a higher risk of infection since the patient’s chest must remain open during the ECMO run, therefore every effort should be made to close the skin as much as possible after cannulation. Central cannulation also allows support for higher ows and allows for easy placement of a left ventricular vent in order to prevent left ventricular dilation (discussed below).
As with V-V ECMO cannulation, the ECMO circuit is appropriately connected
ensuring no air in the lines, an “ECMO Checklist” is performed and support is initi­ated slowly. Cannulation can trigger a vasodilatory response so vasopressors should be available to support the blood pressure. Conversely, correction of the low output state may allow for rapid weaning of vasopressors and close monitoring of blood pressure is critical.
331
Circuit Function andMonitoring While onECMO [8]
The amount of ECMO support delivered to the patient is described by three vari­ables: the ow through the circuit, the percentage of oxygen delivered by the gas in the oxygenator known as the delivered oxygen fraction (FdO2), and the ow rate of the gas in the oxygenator known as the sweep ow. The FdO2 is analogous to the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) on the ventilator and is one of the determinants of the oxygenation of blood. The sweep ow rate determines the rate of carbon dioxide removal from the blood and is analogous to the minute ventilation. The ow through the circuit is determined by several factors: the rotations per minute of the pump (RPMs), the resistance to drainage through the venous cannula, and the resis­tance to return through the return cannula. Increasing the RPMs will increase the ow; however, it is important to remember that the ECMO pump is both preload dependent and afterload sensitive so the ow may vary at the same RPMs due to different loading conditions.
Oxygenation of the blood via the ECMO circuit is related to two factors: the
FdO2 and the total ow of the ECMO circuit. Approximately 70% of blood must participate in efcient gas exchange to maintain an arterial saturation of 90–94%.
332
https://t.me/medicina_free
Therefore if 1.0 FdO2 is delivered, then the ECMO circuit ow must be ~70% of the cardiac output to achieve this goal. This is particularly relevant for V-V ECMO when deciding the goal ow rates.
Monitoring the ECMO patient includes rstly a full physical exam assessing the
cannulation sites, neurologic status of the patient (stroke is a common complication especially in anticoagulated patients) and assessing distal extremities especially in peripherally cannulated patients. The native hemodynamic function of the patient is also important to continually assess and is indicated by mean arterial pressure, vaso­pressors, and inotropes. The ventilator settings and the FdO2, sweep gas and ow (RPMs) delivered by the ECMO circuit should be noted with the intent to continu­ously wean the patient from the circuit. Frequent laboratory monitoring is also nec­essary including complete blood count (CBC) to monitor infection (pneumonia is a common complication), hemoglobin, platelets, and coagulation factors to prevent bleeding complications. The kidneys do not tolerate long ECMO runs due to rela­tive ischemia, and the patient’s creatinine must be judiciously monitored. CVVH should be initiated early if the patient’s renal function starts to decline. In addition to laboratory monitoring, daily chest X-rays and frequent echo are important to assess cannula location, pulmonary edema, and left ventricular size.
P. Moonsamy and J. Crowley
Weaning ECMO [1]
The patient must have sufcient recovery of native lung function in order to liberate from the V-V ECMO circuit. This can be detected by improvements in imaging, lung compliance, and resolution of the underlying disease process. As the patient’s native lung function improves, the required sweep gas ow and FdO2 will decrease. Once these are minimal, then the patient can be placed on standard ventilatory set­tings, and the sweep gas turned to 0LPM.This effectively means the patient is off ECMO.Flow is maintained in the ECMO circuit in order to prevent thrombosis; however, no gas exchange is occurring. The patient’s tidal volumes should be >4–5cc/kg, indicating good lung compliance. The FiO2 delivered by the ventilator should also be weaned to whatever the clinician is willing to tolerate to come off the ECMO circuit and just use the ventilator for oxygenation. If the patient tolerates this “capping trial” for a prescribed period of time (6-24hrs depending on the fragility of their respiratory status), then they can be decannulated. Decannulation from V-V ECMO can usually be performed at the bedside with cannula removed and hemo­stasis obtained with sutures at the skin site and manual pressure. Patients who do not show signs of lung recovery should be considered for referral to a lung transplant center that has experience with prolonged ECMO weans and the possibility of lung transplant if the patient fails to wean.
Weaning from V-A ECMO is more complicated as the sweep ow can never be
reduced to zero because this would create a large shunt with deoxygenated blood returning to the arterial system. First and foremost, the patient’s underlying prob­lem should have been addressed and treated before weaning and the patient’s other end organ function should be recovering. The pulsatility of the native heart
29 Extra-Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation
https://t.me/medicina_free
should be assessed with TTE, examination of the arterial line waveform and should be >20mmHg on low dose inotropes. Once this has been achieved, a “ramp trial” can be attempted. During this trial, the ECMO ows are slowly decremented to 2LPM over a period of 12–24h and an echocardiogram is obtained. If this study is promising, then the patient can be further anticoagulated, and the ows further reduced until the circuit is clamped and the patient is observed off of ECMO.Caution must be taken in the setting of right ventricular failure as often the right ventricle only needs partial unloading and failure to wean may not be apparent immedi­ately. If the wean is successful, the patient can be decannulated from V-A ECMO which is commonly done via surgical cut down and direct repair of the femo­ral artery.
333
Complications andTroubleshooting [4, 9]
North-South Syndrome
Also known as Harlequin Syndrome, North-South Syndrome (or differential hypoxia) is a complication specic to peripheral V-A ECMO.The phenomenon is caused by the retrograde direction of the arterial ow from the cannula up the aorta toward the heart. The oxygenated “ECMO blood” meets the “native blood” that is ejected by the heart after it has started to recover and regain pulsatility. If the patient’s native lung function is severely compromised, then this blood has the potential to be signicantly hypoxic. This is problematic as the coronaries and the cerebral circulation are more likely to see native blood and consequently will suffer hypoxic injury despite adequate performance of the ECMO circuit. Close monitor­ing for this phenomenon is critical and includes arterial blood gas sampling from the right upper extremity as this reects the blood entering the cerebral circulation and will give warning of differential hypoxia.
Troubleshooting depends on the severity of the lung injury. As a rst maneuver,
ventilatory support can be optimized to improve native blood oxygenation. However, this is not ideal if it results in injurious settings that can potentiate further lung injury and reduce the likelihood of recovery. Negative inotropes and diuretics can also be used to depress cardiac function and decrease ejection. If the patient’s car­diac function has recovered signicantly, one could consider also converting to V-V ECMO.Another option is to create a hybrid circuit, known as veno-arteriovenous ECMO (V-AV). Here, an additional return cannula is placed in one of the jugular or subclavian veins and y-connected to the arterial cannula so that some oxygenated blood is returned to the venous system, “pre-oxygenating” the blood before it passes into the native lungs and therefore before it is ejected by the heart. In effect, the patient will then be on both V-V and V-A ECMO.This conguration can be chal­lenging to maintain as it requires higher total drainage to support the ows needed as well as a partial occluding clamp to adjust the relative venous vs arterial ow. As a last resort, the patient can be converted to central cannulation (to achieve ante­grade arterial ow) or biventricular support can be initiated with separate temporary
334
https://t.me/medicina_free
left and right ventricular assist devices and an oxygenator in order to preoxygenate all the blood going through the right heart.
P. Moonsamy and J. Crowley
Left Ventricular Distension [1]
An additional complication specic to peripheral V-A ECMO is left ventricular (LV) distension which results from an impaired left ventricle facing the elevated afterload resulting from retrograde arterial ECMO ow up the aorta. Distension of the left ventricle will lead to further left ventricular stress in the setting of increased wall tension as well as the potential for signicant pulmonary edema which will reduce the likelihood of liberation from ECMO.Frequent echocardiography should be used to assess for aortic insufciency, LV function, mitral regurgitation, and LV size. Chest X-rays can also be used to look for pulmonary edema progression, and consideration of a pulmonary artery catheter to monitor LV lling pressures.
If left untreated, this can lead to irreversible LV injury, pulmonary edema, and
stasis in the LV leading to clot formation. An initial maneuver can be to increase inotropic support to encourage LV contractility. In addition, ECMO ow can be increased further to decrease blood returning to the LV.Additional invasive methods of decompressing the left ventricle can be used such as placement of an intra-aortic balloon pump, placement of a percutaneous left ventricular assist device (Impella), atrial septostomy, or placement of a surgical vent via the left ventricular apex or the left superior pulmonary vein.
Thrombosis
In all forms of ECMO, it is optimal to maintain a reasonable degree of anticoagula­tion to reduce the risk of thrombosis in the circuit and thrombotic complications in the patient. The oxygenator and circuit tubing should be monitored closely to check for clot or brin formation, and the circuit should be switched out if large clots form. Targeted levels of anticoagulation vary by institution and usually involve tar­geting a aPTT range, a Xa range, or an activated clotting time. If the risk of bleeding is too high for a particular patient, just a bolus dose can be used for cannulation (which carries the highest initial risk of thrombosis due to stasis in the cannula), or anticoagulation can be avoided all together. Cannulation and running ECMO with­out anticoagulation have been reported, so in the appropriate patient, this is reason­able acknowledging the likely increased risk of thrombotic complications. Other strategies to prevent thrombosis include preferentially owing the circuit at higher rates, having two providers perform cannulation simultaneously to avoid prolonged periods where a cannula is left clamped with no ow, and ushing of cannulas with saline to avoid any blood sitting in them while ECMO is being prepared.
29 Extra-Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation
https://t.me/medicina_free
335
Limb Ischemia
Limb ischemia complications with peripheral V-A ECMO are extremely common, and frequent physical examination of the distal extremities is very important. Doppler assessment of distal arterial ow can be challenging given the non-pulsatile nature of the ECMO circuit. Given that the ECMO cannulas are large and can com­pletely occlude the vessel at the insertion site, patients usually experience ischemia complications in the limb that was cannulated. We therefore advocate for the routine placement of a distal perfusion cannula into the supercial femoral artery (SFA) on the same side that the femoral arterial cannula is placed. A 5–7Fr cannula is placed antegrade into the SFA under ultrasound guidance. It is easier to place the distal perfusor before the larger arterial cannula is placed because the SFA can go into vasospasm after cannulation which makes it difcult to identify.
References
1. Squiers JJ, Lima B, DiMaio JM.Contemporary extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy in adults: fundamental principles and systematic review of the evidence. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;152(1):20–32.
2. Zapol W. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in severe acute respiratory failure. JAMA. 1979;242(20):2193.
3. Akoumianaki E, Jonkman A, Sklar MC, etal. A rational approach on the use of extracorpo­real membrane oxygenation in severe hypoxemia: advanced technology is not a panacea. Ann Intensive Care. 2021;11:107.
4. Rao P, Khalpey Z, Smith R, etal. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for car­diogenic shock and cardiac arrest. Circ Heart Fail. 2018;11(9):e004905.
5. https://www.elso.org/registry/internationalsummaryandreports/internationalsummary.aspx. Accessed 23 Jun 2023.
6. Axtell AL, Funamoto M, Legassey AG, etal. Predictors of neurologic recovery in patients who undergo extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory cardiac arrest. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2020;34(2):356–62.
7. Osho AA, Moonsamy P, Hibbert KA, et al. Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygen­ation for respiratory failure in COVID-19 patients: early experience from a major Academic Medical Center in North America. Ann Surg. 2020;272(2):e75–8.
8. Mazzef MA, Rao VK, Dodd-O J, etal. Intraoperative Management of Adult Patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: an expert consensus statement from the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists-Part I, technical aspects of extracorporeal membrane oxy­genation. Anesth Analg. 2021;133(6):1459–77.
9. Sidebotham D.Troubleshooting adult ECMO.J Extra Corpor Technol. 2011;43(1):P27–32.
Chapter 30
https://t.me/medicina_free
Durable Mechanical Circulatory Support
LynzeFranko andDavidD’Alessandro
Left Ventricular Support
Indications [17]
• Initially, left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) were utilized as a temporary treatment for patients listed for transplant until a heart transplant became avail­able. This was deemed bridge to transplant (BTT).
• Destination therapy (DT) is a term utilized for the treatment of patients with end­stage heart failure refractory to optimal medical management who are not candi­dates for heart transplant. Reasons for these patients not to be a heart transplant candidate often include age, active substance use such as smoking, insulin­dependent diabetes with end organ damage, recent cancer history, chronic renal failure, or other signicant comorbidity. There is current FDA approval for both BTT and DT indications (now referred to as short term and long term, respectively).
• Alternative designations for LVAD implementation include bridge to decision and bridge to candidacy for patients who still have tests or treatments required before they can ofcially be evaluated or listed for heart transplantation. There is also bridge to recovery, though this indication is less common. Bridge to recov­ery patients are often identied after improvement in cardiac function following
L. Franko (*) Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA e-mail: lfranko@mgb.org
D. D’Alessandro Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA e-mail: dadalessandro@mgh.harvard.edu
Switzerland AG 2024 J. P. Bloom, T. M. Sundt (eds.), Cardiac Surgery Clerkship, Contemporary Surgical Clerkships, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41301-8_30
337© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature
338
https://t.me/medicina_free
L. Franko and D. D’Alessandro
LVAD implantation. Careful evaluation can identify a small subset of patients in whom the LVAD can be safely removed.
• Approximately 50% of LVAD utilization is for DT, while 26% is for BTT and 23% is for bridge to candidacy. However, DT or long-term LVAD therapy con­tinues to grow as the primary designation for LVAD treatment.
• Indications for LVAD implantation include:
– New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class IV congestive heart failure symp-
toms refractory to maximal medical therapy and conventional surgical interventions.
NYHA Stage IV=unable to carry on any physical activity without symp­toms of heart failure or having symptoms at rest. These patients continue to have this level of symptoms despite already being on maximal medical therapy and having undergone needed surgical inter­ventions, such as coronary artery bypass grafting or valve repair/replacement.
– Ejection fraction <25%. – Reduced functional capacity with a maximal oxygen consumption (VO2)
<14mg/kg/min or inability to complete the test. – Dependency on IV inotropes or temporary mechanical circulatory support. – Estimated mortality over 50% at 1year with medical management.
• Contraindications to LVAD implantation include limited life expectancy due to malignancy or concomitant end organ failure, pulmonary HTN, signicant right heart failure, or lack of social support.
• The interagency registry for mechanically assisted circulatory support (INTERMACS) collects data from government and private organizations regard­ing the utilization and outcomes of FDA-approved mechanical circulatory sup­port devices. There are also INTERMACS proles or levels that further classify patients with advanced heart failure (NYHA III–IV) to better assess their need for mechanical circulatory support and risks related to intervention. INTERMACS class 1 is identied as critical cardiogenic shock, while class 7 is identied as advanced NYHA III symptoms.
– Classically, most patients selected for LVADs are INTERMACS class 2–3.
Highest risks of complications and mortality of LVAD implantation are seen in INTERMACS class 1. Growing evidence shows improved outcomes and reduction in complications for patients with ambulatory heart failure (class 4–7) prior to signicant decompensation with LVAD implantation. However, there are concerns that this relatively healthy population can experience dev­astating complications with LVAD implantation.
• Selection for LVAD therapy is complex as the patient will need to be adherent to medical therapy, manage the machine/batteries around the clock, and have sub­stantial support systems in place throughout treatment. Further, these patients can face signicant adverse events and re-hospitalizations. For this reason, selec­tion of patients for LVAD therapy is reviewed by a multi-disciplinary team, who can help optimize patient selection in order to maximize patient benet.
30 Durable Mechanical Circulatory Support
https://t.me/medicina_free
339
Devices [3, 5, 810]
• Devices can either have pulsatile ow or continuous ow. Initial pulsatile devices were pneumatic and were associated with high rates of mechanical failure. Given this, devices were instead focused on continuous ow. In 2016, greater than 95% of implanted devices were continuous ow. One of the newer devices, HeartMate3 (HM3; Abbott Labs, Chicago, IL), was created with an articial pulse created with rhythmic pump speed modulation. This is thought to mimic natural blood ow to theoretically reduce bleeding and thromboembolic events. The HM3 is currently the only FDA-approved, durable LVAD available in the US.
• Another delineation in devices is between axial ow and centrifugal ow. Axial ow is created by a propeller within a pipe with blood ow parallel to the axis of rotation. Centrifugal ow is created by a disk spinning within a cavity with blood ow perpendicular to the axis of disc rotation. Newer centrifugal pumps also use magnetic levitation of the disc to reduce friction and hemolysis.
• There are several different LVAD devices. Three commonly utilized LVAD devices include HeartMate II (HMII; Abbott Labs), HeartWare HVAD (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN), and the HM3.
– HeartMate II: FDA approved for BTT 2008 and DT 2010. Axial ow device
with the motor placed within a preperitoneal pocket. The HMII is no longer being produced and has been replaced by the HM3.
– HVAD: FDA approved for BTT 2012 and DT 2017. Centrifugal ow device
with magnetic levitation. Motor placed within the pericardium. Recently, evi­dence of increased risk of signicant neurological adverse events was identi­ed in HVAD when compared to HM3. Medtronic has stopped distribution and sale of the HVAD.
– HeartMate3: FDA approved for BTT 2017 and DT 2018. Centrifugal ow
device with magnetic levitation. Motor placed within the pericardium. This is currently the most common LVAD device implanted in the US. The MOMENTUM 3 trial by Mehra etal. (2019) demonstrated survival similar between HMII and HM3; however, HM 3 had higher rates of survival at 2years free of reoperation and disabling stroke.
REMATCH Clinical Trial [1]
• Randomized Evaluation of Mechanical Assistance for the Treatment of Congestive Heart Failure (REMATCH) is a randomized multicenter trial evaluat­ing outcomes comparing patients with end-stage heart disease who were not car­diac transplant candidates treated with maximum medical therapy versus long- term LVAD.
• The study included 129 patients with NYHA stage IV heart failure (68 LVAD vs 61 medical management). The LVAD utilized in this study was the pneumatic HeartMate VE (Thoratec, Pleasanton, CA). Survival rates were 52% in the LVAD
340
https://t.me/medicina_free
group and 25% in the medical management group at 1year. Additionally, at 1 year the LVAD group reported improved quality of life compared to the medical management group. However, the LVAD group did have 2.35 times more serious adverse events, including infection, bleeding, and device malfunction. This was one of the leading studies which indicated survival benet for DT over medical management.
L. Franko and D. D’Alessandro
Surgical Implantation Technique [1113]
• Classically, inow of the LVAD is within the apex of the left ventricle (LV). The most common outow location for LVADs is within the ascending aorta, though placement within the descending aorta has been utilized with minimally invasive techniques. The placement of the pump itself is either within the pericardial pocket (HVAD and HM3) or within a preperitoneal pocket (HMII). The drive line is tunneled within the abdominal wall, which attaches to a power supply.
• The classic approach for LVAD implantation is through a median sternotomy, though some less invasive approaches have been developed. These alternative minimally invasive approaches are particularly benecial in patients with prior coronary bypass grafts as it can help avoid accidental injury to bypass grafts dur­ing redo sternotomies. Further, these approaches can help reduce the formation of adhesions, which can complicate cardiac transplant in the future. Even with the classic approach, it is recommended to avoid dissection in areas critical to cardiac transplantation, like between the aorta and pulmonary artery, in order to avoid adhesion formation. Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is most often required with LVAD implantation, though some new techniques do not require this support.
– Minimally invasive techniques are increasingly utilized. One approach is the
left thoracotomy combined with either mini-sternotomy versus a right mini­thoracotomy. The inow cannula is implanted via the left thoracotomy. Then, the outow cannula is most often implanted via a right mini-thoracotomy or mini-sternotomy. Minimally invasive techniques avoid the need for a com­plete sternotomy, which has greater morbidity and longer recovery.
• Below is a description of the general surgical technique for a HM3 implantation:
– Cannulate the patient for CPB. Bi-caval cannulation suggested if placing a
temporary RVAD or need for mitral valve repair/replacement.
– Placing the inow cannula in the LV can be performed by two methods: (1)
Sew then cut (described below) or (2) Cut then sew.
The LV apex is elevated to allow for appropriate inow placement. The inow cannula should point toward the mitral valve. If the inow cannula is directed toward the septum (placed too laterally), it can create obstruction of blood ow, which can lead to long-term issues. Transesophageal echo-