Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_1109_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана
.pdf
Prophylactic Procedures
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
forOrthopedic Pathologies
FuatAkpinar , KorhanOzkan , KrishnaReddy ,
EsatUygur
andMehmetSalihSoylemez
, ErhanOkay ,
35
35.1 Introduction
Orthopaedics and traumatology encompasses
many subspecialities involving pediatric orthopedics, orthopedic oncology, hand surgery, foot and
ankle surgery, traumatology, deformity management, sports medicine, and arthroplasty. In this
chapter, we aimed to give a brief information for
some prophylactic procedures in orthopedics,
which may be useful not only for orthopedic surgeons, but also to other doctors to have a general
idea for referring their patients and adequately
addressing their problems. Timely implementation of prophylactic procedures may decrease the
patient’s morbidity and even mortality, especially
in oncological cases. For example, simple treatment of developmental hip dysplasia in infancy
with pelvic harness may prevent formidable hip
arthroplasty in early adulthood, or prophylactic
F. Akpinar · K. Ozkan (*) · E. Uygur · E. Okay
Department of Orthopaedics, Istanbul Medeniyet
University Goztepe Education and Research Hospital,
Istanbul, Turkey
e-mail: fuat.akpinar@medeniyet.edu.tr; korhan.
ozkan@medeniyet.edu.tr; esat.uygur@medeniyet.
edu.tr; erhan.okay@saglik.gov.tr
K. Reddy
Department of Orthopedics, University of Cincinnati
& VA Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
M. S. Soylemez
Department of Orthopaedics, Health Sciences
University Umraniye Training and Research Hospital,
Istanbul, Turkey
xation of an impending fracture in a patient with
bone metastases may improve patient survival
substantially. Simple prophylactic exostectomy
for small diabetic foot ulcer may prevent an
unnecessary amputation in future. In this context,
three main topics were selected for prophylactic
surgery in orthopedic pathologies, including
pathological fractures, foot and ankle problems
and osteoarthritis of knee and hip, and developmental hip dysplasia.
35.2 Prophylactic Surgery
toPrevent Pathologic
Fractures
A fracture that develops through an area of bone
pathology is termed as a pathologic fracture.
When the extent of bone destruction is such that
a bone can no longer withstand physiologic loads
and a fracture is imminent, it is termed as an
impending fracture. Pathologic fractures can be
secondary to a benign lesion, such as Paget disease, giant cell tumor of bone, hemangioma, or a
malignant tumor, which may be a primary bone
or hemopoietic malignancy (osteosarcoma, chondrosarcoma, lymphoma, multiple myeloma) or
metastatic carcinoma.
The common solid tumors that metastasize to
the bone arise from breast, prostate, kidney, lung
cancer, or thyroid gland [1]. Metastases to bone
develop in about two-thirds of all patients who
die from cancer [2]. Involvement of bone is seen
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021
O. N. Dilek et al. (eds.), Prophylactic Surgery, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66853-2_35
423

424
F. Akpinar et al.
in <95% of patients with multiple myeloma, 75%
of patients with breast and prostate cancer, and
15–40% of patients with other types of tumors
[3]. The most common origin of bone metastasis
due to a solid organ is breast carcinoma in women
and prostate carcinoma in men. Skeletal lesions
can be also the rst manifestation of malignancies in 25–30% of solid organ tumors. Bone
metastasis can also develop in patients with
osteosarcoma, chondrosarcoma, and Ewing’s
sarcoma; however, soft tissue sarcoma rarely
causes bone metastases. Pain, pathologic fracture, hypercalcemia, and spinal cord compression
are forms of skeletal-related events (SREs) due to
bone metastases [4].
Multiple myeloma is another frequent cause
of the pathological fracture. It is characterized by
a malignant monoclonal proliferation of plasma
cells. It is the second most common hematological malignancy after non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma
and the most common primary bone tumor in
older patients. In multiple myeloma bone disease, the interaction between malignant plasma
cells and bone microenvironment leads to
increased osteoclastic function with decreased
osteoblastic activity. Twenty-ve percent of the
patients present with spontaneous fracture, and
the death rate is increased by more than 20% in
these patients with pathological fractures.
Stavropoulous etal. found that the patients presenting with a spontaneous fracture at diagnosis
had poorer prognosis with median overall survival of 30months compared to 86 months in
those without fractures. The risk of death was
also signicantly increased in patients who developed all subtypes of fracture after multiple
myeloma. Prophylactic xation before complete
fracture occurrence, therefore, is an important
treatment strategy in these patients.
The goals of treatment, regardless of underlying etiology, are to minimize morbidity and maximize function and skeletal integrity. For most
patients with a completed or impending pathologic
fracture of a long bone, this will necessitate surgical xation. Surgical treatment of impending fractures is technically easier and less morbid
compared to surgical treatment of complete pathological fractures. In various studies, surgical xa-
tion of impending fractures due to metastatic bone
disease has also demonstrated improved longer
survival in comparison to complete pathological
fractures. The improved survival could be attributed to the fact that xation of impending fracture
bears advantages of less morbidity, which results
in correspondingly low secondary surgical complications, such as infection, implant failure, and
venous thromboembolism, among others. It also
contributes toward the timely initiation of chemotherapy or radiation treatment for these patients.
The diagnosis of impending or complete pathological fracture is established on radiographic
studies. With advances in imaging technologies,
such as whole-body-magnetic resonance imaging
(MRI), positron emission tomography-computed
tomography (PET-CT) allows for whole-body
screening with high sensitivity and specicity.
This has enabled early diagnosis of impending
fractures in asymptomatic patients and treatment
with radiation therapy with or without early surgical xation.
One of the most common scoring systems
used in decision-making in a metastatic extremity lesion is Mirels’ classication. It is based on
four characteristics. It takes into account the site
of the lesion (upper limb/lower limb/trochanteric
region), nature of the lesion (blastic/mixed/lytic),
size of the lesion, and presence of pain. Points are
allocated as shown in Table 35.1. The scoring
Table 35.1 Mirels’ scoring system
Site of lesion Score
• Upper limb 1
• Lower limb 2
• Trochanteric region 3
Nature of lesion
• Blastic 1
• Mixed 2
• Lytic 3
Size of lesion
• 1/3 of cortex 1
• 1/3–2/3 of cortex 2
• >2/3 of cortex 3
Pain
• Mild 1
• Moderate 2
• Functional 3

35 Prophylactic Procedures forOrthopedic Pathologies
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
425
Table 35.2 Treatment recommendations according to
Mirels’ score
Mirels’ score Treatment recommendation
≤7
8 Use clinical judgment
≥9
Radiotherapy and observation
Prophylactic xation
system suggests a treatment algorithm based on
the total score (Table35.2).
Lesions in the pertrochanteric area are at the
highest risk of fracture due to maximal stresses
on this part of the femur on load-bearing. For
scores ≤7, the lesion can be treated conservatively with radiotherapy and observation. For a
score of ≥9, prophylactic xation is recommended. The overall score of eight presents a
clinical dilemma. The probability of fracture is
only 15%, and Mirels’ recommended the treating attending physician to use clinical judgement in such cases in considering prophylactic
xation [5].
Precise estimation of survival in patients with
metastatic disease is of utmost importance and
allows for treatment planning for patients who
present to healthcare facilities with impending or
complete pathological fractures. Treatment
modalities vary depending on estimated survival,
and PathFx model is a new promising prediction
model, taking into consideration age, gender,
type of pathological fracture, presence of visceral metastasis, lymph node metastasis, hemoglobin and leukocyte concentration at initial
presentation, primary oncological diagnosis,
number of bone metastasis, and ECOG status of
the patient. It has been validated in various populations [6, 7].
For solitary lesions, a different treatment strategy is recommended, especially if the metastatic
lesion is arising from renal cell carcinoma (RCC)
or thyroid carcinoma. In these lesions, wide surgical resection compared to surgical xation is
important, as it is related to improved survival
and even complete cure of the disease in some
cases. The decision is made jointly by an orthopedic oncologist, medical oncologist, and radiation oncologist.
The impending pathological fractures of the
extremities can be treated using orthopedic plates
or intramedullary (IM) nails (Figs. 35.1 and
35.2). Plate xation offers a load-bearing con-
struct, whereas intramedullary nailing works a
load-sharing construct. Where feasible, IM nailing is preferred as it is as a load-sharing device, is
possible to be performed closed (without opening
up the site fracture or pathology), and has the
advantage of spanning most of the length of the
long bone, thereby preventing the need for further intervention should a subsequent lesion
develop in the same bone.
The aim of radiotherapy in patients with bone
metastasis is to improve the quality of life, maintain skeletal function, and minimize pain.
Radiotherapy, as a treatment modality in patients
who have metastatic lesions of the long bone,
should be planned according to the Mirels’ scoring
system [5]. Radiotherapy in patients with bone
metastasis aims to improve the quality of life,
maintain skeletal function, and minimize pain.
Radiotherapy enables to destroy tumor cells and,
therefore, provides a suitable environment for
potential union. Apart from being the basic modality of treatment for patients with Mirels’ score of 7
or under, radiotherapy is also utilized in an adjuvant manner following stabilization of a complete
or impending pathological fracture in a patient
with Mirels’ score of 9 or more (Table35.1).
With improvements in chemo and radiotherapy, surgical xation techniques with newer reliable implants decreased surgical complications.
It is possible to improve the overall quality of life
for patients with impending and complete pathologic fractures. The orthopedic surgeon treating
the patient must be aware of compromised healing characteristics of pathologic bone along with
increased infection rates in these patients due to
underlying tumor processes and related treatment. Where possible, an orthopedic oncologist
should be involved in the care of such patients.
The ultimate goal is to obtain immediate functional recovery and strategies to allow for appropriate adjuvant treatments to improve the overall
quality of life in these patients.

426
F. Akpinar et al.
a
c
d
b
Fig. 35.1 The 44-year-old woman with bilateral impending proximal hip fracture due to metastatic breast carcinoma (a) preoperative view. (b) After implementation of
bilateral proximal femoral nails. (c) At 6months after surgery, this time complete fracture at the distal femoral
diaphysis, (d) plate xation was performed
a b c
Fig. 35.2 The 84-year-old woman with right complete
fracture and left impending fracture due to metastatic
breast carcinoma (a) preoperative radiograph. (b)
Preoperative MRI. (c) Long-cemented prosthetic replacement to the right hip and long reconstruction nail xation
on the left femur

35 Prophylactic Procedures forOrthopedic Pathologies
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
427
35.3 Prophylactic Surgery inFoot
andAnkle
The foot is a unique structure designed to withstand signicant loads. It is, thus, imperative that
preoperative planning plays a signicant role in
foot and ankle surgery. When a surgeon performs
an osteotomy or a tendon surgery, the biomechanics of the foot are altered. The foot is unique
in that it molds as it is squeezed into a shoe. The
bony prominences, minimal subcutaneous tissue,
and presence of any implants in a foot may contribute to persistent pain. There are certain circumstances where prophylactic surgery for the
foot and ankle is indicated.
In hallux valgus surgery, the metatarsal
parabola needs to be restored intraoperatively.
When shortening osteotomies of the rst metatarsal are performed, the lesser metatarsals may
remain relatively longer. This consideration
should be included in the preoperative plan, and
intraoperatively lesser metatarsals may need
shortening to prevent formation of callosities
and pain under the second (or third) ray
(Fig.35.3a–c). Likewise, in patients with hallux
rigidus undergoing rst metatarsophalangeal
arthrodesis, it is recommended that the interphalangeal sesamoids (if present) be excised to prevent late symptoms [8].
Patients with peripheral neuropathy or Charcot
foot have signicant issues with wound healing
and are at high risk for developing decubitus
ulcers [9]. In such patients, prophylactic exostec-
tomy to remove bony prominences assists not
only with wound healing, but also in the prevention of ulcers and should be considered.
It is not uncommon to have patients complain
of hardware-related symptoms in the foot and
ankle as discussed earlier. They may complain of
prominent plates or screw heads making shoe
wear uncomfortable. Implant removal may also
be considered as prophylactic surgery in these
circumstances. In clinical practice, some surgeons routinely advise implant removal to their
patients.
35.4 Prophylactic Surgery
toPrevent Knee
Osteoarthritis andPain
Osteoarthritis in the knee joint (gonarthrosis)
develops due to the joint cartilage damage caused
by injury to the joint cartilage or improper
distribution of forces on the joint because cartilage functions as a weight-bearing layer and
absorbs and distributes loads to the underlying
bone [10]. The nonuniform distribution of loads
on cartilage is the most common pathology causing primary osteoarthritis in the human knee, and
the development of osteoarthritis can be prevented, delayed, or even partially cured by prophylactic surgical methods. Prophylactic
restoration of the anatomy aims to preserve the
biological vitality of the patient’s tissues as much
as possible rather than changing them to prosthe-
a bc
Fig. 35.3 The 57-year-old female patient was complaining metatarsalgia under the second and third ray of the
foot. Painful callosities were observed (a). She underwent
an osteotomy due to hallux valgus deformity 8years ago.
Relatively long metatarsals (marked with asterix) were
d
seen at her foot anteroposterior radiograph, which is considered to be the reason for the pain (b). After metatarsal
shortening osteotomies were performed (c), the callosities
were spontaneously relieved in the long term (d)

428
F. Akpinar et al.
ses in the future after the development of the gonarthrosis [11].
The alignment and rotation of the lower
extremity have been developed in harmony with
surrounding ligaments and muscles. Patella joins
this harmony positioned in/and between a tendon
and ligament. It transfers load from the hip to the
tibia and stabilizes the joint in many ways. Q
angle is the angle between the quadriceps muscle
and the patellar tendon and determines the direction of the forces affecting the patella. Any
change in pelvic angle, hip anteversion, tibiofemoral angle, tibial torsion, navicular drop, the
existence of genu recurvatum, and femoral and
tibial length also affects the Q angle and may
alter the direction of the forces and load distribution at patellofemoral joint [12]. This situation is
the main reason for patellofemoral osteoarthritis
and knee pain. There are several prophylactic
surgical procedures, including soft tissue interventions, bony interventions, and combined to
prevent this condition. For example, Maquet
osteotomy, Elmslie-Trillat osteotomy, and
Fulkerson osteotomy are the procedures mostly
used to restore the Q angle by distal realignment
of the patellar tendon [13–15]. Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction, lateral
retinacular release, and medial plication are some
examples of soft tissue interventions [16].
Depending on the extent of the pathology, these
procedures with derotational osteotomies of the
femur and/or tibia may also be used to restore the
anatomy [17] (Fig.35.4).
There is a unique longitudinal alignment
between the femur and tibia, both on sagittal and
coronal planes. Disruptions, particularly on the
coronal plane, lead to genu varum (the main reason for medial knee pain and osteoarthritis) or
genu valgum [18]. In pediatric age, trauma, infection, radiation, or some metabolic diseases may
cause physeal arrest of the proximal tibia or distal
femur. These conditions may lead to imbalanced
longitudinal growth and deformity in three planes
around the knee. To prevent the development of
malalignment in any plane, physeal bar excision,
epiphysiodesis, and limb lengthening or deformity
correction with circular xation, or a combination
of these techniques can be used [19] (Fig.35.5).
However, treatment strategies for adults are different for coronal knee deformities. These patholo-
a
Fig. 35.4 (a, b) Preoperative X-rays of a 23-year-old
patient with patellar instability. The patient had undergone
an unsuccessful MPFL repair surgery 3years ago and now
complaining from anterior knee pain and feeling of subluxation. (c) Intraoperative image showing the medial
transfer of the patellar tendon. (d, e) Postoperative AP and
b
c
d
lateral X-rays showing patellofemoral ligament reconstruction using hamstring allograft and distal patellar tendon realignment using Elmslie-Trillat osteotomy
technique. Note the centered patella on the femur when
compared to preoperative X-rays
e

35 Prophylactic Procedures forOrthopedic Pathologies
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
ab c
429
Fig. 35.5 (a) A 6-year-old boy sustained a lateral tibial
physeal arrest after conservatively treated proximal tibia
fracture. After 3years of follow-up, the patient developed
a genu valgum deformity namely “Cozen deformity” on
the right side. (b) AP preoperative X-rays of both knees
gies can be addressed using proximal tibial
osteotomies [20]. Genu valgum is a relatively rare
pathology, and most of the surgeons have dened
procedures focusing on correcting the genu varum.
Proximal tibial lateral closed or medial open osteotomies have been reported to be very effective to
restore the alignment, prevent the development of
the osteoarthritis, and alleviate the medial knee
pain. However, all these procedures have potential
complications like deep vein thrombosis, peroneal
nerve palsy, wound infections, nonunion, etc.
From this point of view, surgeons have currently
focused on a different concept to prevent knee pain
and osteoarthritis [21].
The theory “asymmetrical subsidence” claims
that the proximal tibial plateau has a relatively
soft metaphysis prone to osteoporosis by the age.
As the lateral tibia plateau is supported by three
cortexes (two bular and one lateral tibial cortex)
and medial plateau by one cortex, a subsiding
much more severe on the medial side may occur
and lead to the development of a genu varum and
medial knee compartment osteoarthritis [21].
From this point of view, resection of the bula
with or without arthroscopic debridement of the
knee and/or medial high tibial osteotomy for
selective cases has been reported to be a safe,
promising, and more biological way as a prophy-
showing lateral growth arrest and progressive genu valgum. A medial epiphysiodesis with a plate was carried out
for the patient. (c) Postoperative AP X-rays after 7months
showing remarkable improvement in alignment
lactic surgical procedure (Fig.35.6).This procedure must be performed for patients with a varus
less than 5°, as the patients with severe varus
have been reported not to benet from only bular resection [11].
35.5 Prophylactic Surgery
toPrevent Hip Osteoarthritis
DuetoAcetabular Dysplasia
The hip joint connects the lower limb to the
trunk and provides a basis for the upright posture
and balanced movement. The hip joint is supported by a large number of ligaments and surrounding muscles during hip movements,
thereby producing unlimited movement modications and amplications [22]. The hip joint is a
ball-and- socket-type joint. Socket part is formed
by os pubis, os ischii, and os ilii connected with
Y-shaped triradiate cartilage. And the ball part is
the head of the femur. In acetabular dysplasia, a
developmental deciency exists on the acetabular side of this joint. The acetabulum continues
to develop up until the ages of 8–13, and any
kind of interruption of the growth eventually
leads to an acetabulum deciency [23]. This
interruption of the growth may occur due to the

430
ab c
F. Akpinar et al.
Fig. 35.6 (a) Preoperative orthoroentgenogram of a
40-year-old man complaining left knee medial compartment pain. The X-ray revealed an onset of osteoarthritis in
the medial compartment and 3° varus malalignment. (b)
AP postoperative X-ray showing segmental bular resec-
injury or infection of the triradiate cartilage or
the inadequate treatment of a previous developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), etc. [24]. In
most cases, there is a deciency in the anterolateral wall of the acetabulum. However, the deciency can be detected in the posterior wall as
well. Although it varies according to the amount,
shape, and place of the dysplasia, dislocation,
subluxation, or secondary osteoarthritis almost
always occur later in life due to imbalanced and
inharmonious movements between the femur
and acetabulum. Depending on the amount of
dysplasia, degenerative complaints frequently
arise in adolescents. However, the onset of the
symptoms may not be seen until the sixth decade
of life as well [25]. Since hip dysplasia is a
pathology with the risk of creating irreversible
tion performed. Also, arthroscopic debridement of the
joint was carried out. (c) Postoperative orthoroentgenogram in the third month. Although there was no radiological improvement in the alignment, the patient returned to
daily activities with a pain-free knee joint
problems in the patient’s future life, it should be
treated prophylactically with various methods to
prevent degenerative changes even if it does not
cause complaints as soon as it is noticed until the
fth decade of life [26].
35.6 Prophylactic Interventions
forAcetabular Dysplasia
fromInfancy totheAge
of8Years
In the early examination in infants, positive
Barlow and Ortolani tests are indicative of
unstable hip dislocation. Although there are
several reasons for this condition, the most
common factor is the loose capsule, which can-

35 Prophylactic Procedures forOrthopedic Pathologies
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
431
not keep the femoral head in the acetabulum.
The rst prophylactic treatment of acetabular
dysplasia begins at this stage, and this is when
the treatment is easy and most effective.
Because keeping the femoral head in acetabulum by preventing the dislocation of the head or
with the reduction of a dislocated head applies
pressure to the triradiate cartilage, and acetabulum starts to reshape and develop. This often
results in a gradual deepening and decrease in
the inclination of the acetabulum. However, this
is not always the case, and the acetabulum can
remain shallow and inclined (acetabular dysplasia) more than normal ranges. Hip ultrasonography is now being routinely performed for
newborns, usually 6 weeks after birth for the
DDH survey. Graf type 2b, c, and d hips are
dysplastic hips and need to be treated prophylactically to prevent further deterioration of the
hip joint [27]. Using a Pavlik harness for
6weeks is the most preferred way of the treatment [28]. The aim is still the same; directing
the femoral head to the acetabulum with the
harness and keeping it in the acetabulum.
Although there are several different opinions,
closed reduction with or without adductor
tenotomy and preservation of the reduction in a
hip spica cast (pelvipedal) for 3months is the
most preferred treatment choice for children
between the 6 and 12months old with persistent
or newly diagnosed dysplasia. If a closed reduction cannot be achieved, an open reduction
using a medial approach is performed at this
stage [29]. The closed reduction generally may
not be effective to reduce the hip after
12 months. Thus, an open reduction using a
medial, anterior, or anteromedial incision is
used to intervene in the soft tissues that hinder
the concentric reduction of the hip. The preferred approach is the anterior incision. After
the procedure, the reduction must be preserved
in a hip spica cast for 3months. For dysplasia
that persists after 18months, both bone and soft
tissue interventions are required. The goal is to
increase the anterolateral acetabular coverage,
and the need for additional procedures like capsulorrhaphy and other interventions are performed according to the severity of the case
[30]. Although many different types of osteoto-
mies have been dened, Salter and Dega osteotomy is the most performed osteotomy in this
stage (Fig. 35.7). However, Pemberton,
Pembersal, and many other osteotomy techniques can also be used for this age group. All
these techniques have special indications and
are used for particular cases until the age of 8.
Even though there are controversies about the
age limit, it is assumed that simple iliac osteotomies may not be sufcient to provide coverage
due to the closed triradiate cartilage after
8years of age. Thus, after the closure of the triradiate cartilage in any age, osteotomization of
three pelvic bones (ilium, ischium, and pubis) is
needed for the redirection of the acetabulum.
ab c
Fig. 35.7 (a) AP X-ray of a 22-month-old girl showing
the incidentally diagnosed dysplasia of the right hip. (b)
Initial postoperative AP X-ray showing perfect anterolateral coverage of the hip after a modied Salter osteotomy
procedure. (c) AP X-ray at postoperative seventh year
showing perfect development of the acetabulum without
any residual dysplasia

432
F. Akpinar et al.
35.7 Prophylactic Surgery
forAcetabular Dysplasia
inAdolescents andAdults
In untreated or incidentally diagnosed cases, the
femoral head forms an unstable joint surface that
constantly goes up and down with the edge of the
acetabulum (Fig. 35.6a). This instability often
creates degenerative changes that occur in young
adolescents and generally progresses within a
few years. If the acetabulum is redirected, the
forces on the femur head will be distributed on a
larger surface, and this can prevent and even
reverse degenerative changes [31]. This is why a
groin pain increasing with exion and internal
rotation of the hip must be a warning sign of dysplasia in adolescents and young adults. Although
8years of age is debatable, according to the general opinion, the triradiate cartilage closes and
does not function after this age. Redirecting or
reshaping the acetabulum with the aforementioned techniques becomes impossible, as closed
triradiate cartilage does not bend with simple
osteotomies like Salter osteotomy [23]. Thus,
more complicated osteotomies must be employed
after this age group. If the triradiate cartilage is
still open between the ages 8 and 15, triple
innominate osteotomy (Steel, Tönis), double
innominate osteotomyi (Sutherland), or Dega
osteotomy can be performed to remediate the
defective coverage of the acetabulum. However,
if the patient is older than 15, more complicated
procedures like incomplete triple pelvic osteotomy (a modied form of Steel osteotomy, ITPO)
(Fig.35.8), triple innominate osteotomy (Steel),
Ganz (Bern) [32], or spherical osteotomies
(Wagner, Epright) are inevitable. The choice of
the technique depends on the surgeon’s experience and concentric reduction of the hip detected
with preoperative abduction-internal rotation AP
X-ray of the affected hip joint. ITPO is a good
and applicable technique in cases with a concentric reduction [33]. Although Steel osteotomy is
preferable for slight and moderate dysplasias,
Ganz osteotomy could be better in severe cases.
Cases in which concentric reduction cannot be
achieved, salvage procedures like Chiari osteotomy and shelf acetabuloplasty can be performed.
These techniques do not prevent degenerative
changes, however, they prevent subluxation and
dislocation of the hip.
35.8 Conclusion
Timely implementation of prophylactic surgery
in orthopedics is usually associated with
decreased patient morbidity. Prophylactic surgery obviates the need of more extensive surgical
procedures with more complications by decreas-
ab
Fig. 35.8 (a) AP X-ray of a 34-year-old woman showing
dysplasia of the right hip. Subchondral cyst at the acetabulum is an indicator of the onset of degeneration and osteoarthritis. (b) Abduction-internal rotation AP X-ray
showing concentric reduction of the hip, which means that
a prophylactic redirectional osteotomy may be benecial
for this patient. (c) Initial postoperative AP X-ray of the
right hip showing perfect anterolateral coverage of the hip
after an incomplete triple pelvic osteotomy without lateralization or retroversion of the acetabulum
c
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
