Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_1109_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
02.09.2026
Размер:
20 Мб
Скачать
372
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
İ. Yalç ınkaya and M. T. Doğruyol
bullectomy [3]. These high risks of recurrence have prompted thoracic surgeons to investigate which factors are decisive for the development of recurrence in pneumothorax. The presence of bullae on high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) for pediatric patients presenting with pneumothorax has been reported as a risk factor for ipsilateral recurrence. Studies show that pro­phylactic surgery can be performed in these patients [4, 5]. Contralateral bullae visible on HRCT and a low body mass index have been reported as the indications for prophylactic sur­gery in adult patients with pneumothorax (Fig.31.1) [6, 7].
Sihoe etal. [8] emphasized the importance of preoperatively performed computed tomography (CT) imaging of patients with primary spontane­ous pneumothorax. They reported contralateral
bullae or blebs in 53.6% of patients; contralateral pneumothorax developed in 26.7% of them dur­ing the follow-up period. Besides, none of the patients with contralateral bullae or blebs devel­oped contralateral pneumothorax during the fol­low- up. For this reason, it was stated that prophylactic treatment could be performed in the presence of contralateral bullae or blebs on CT in patients with primary spontaneous pneumotho­rax [8]. Liu et al. [9] reported that 70 of 335 patients with primary spontaneous pneumotho­rax, who showed contralateral bullae or blebs, underwent bilateral video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) in a single session. The recur­rence rate in the VATS group was low, and hence the necessity of prophylactic treatment in these patients was emphasized. This surgery would reduce hospital stays and relieve patients of
b
a
d
c
Fig. 31.1 (a, b) Bilateral bullae are seen in chest X-ray and axial computed tomography images of a young, smoker, asthenic, male patient scheduled for prophylactic surgery, (c) video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery with
wedge resection and pleural abrasion was performed in two separate sessions, rst on the right and then on the left, in one and a half months intervals, (d) postoperative control axial computed tomography
31 Prophylactic Chest Surgery Procedures
Fig. 31.2 (a) A giant bulla is seen in the preoperative chest X-ray of a young female patient, (b) postoperative chest X-ray of the same patient shows re-expansion of the lung
373
potential socioeconomic and psychological burdens [9].
However, Li et al. [10] performed preventive surgery in both hemithoraces with a single inci­sion in 18 patients with primary spontaneous pneumothorax diagnosed with contralateral blebs. Patients who were not intubated and had received mask and epidural anesthesia underwent ipsilateral surgery via an incision through the fth or sixth intercostal space on one side while lying in a semi-supine position. Contralateral prophylactic surgery was performed in the same session, passing from the anterior mediastinum to the hemithorax. This method was found to be safe and feasible [10].
31.2.2 Giant Bulla
The presence of a giant bulla, the development of pneumothorax, or the patient showing symptoms are general indications for surgery. However, asymptomatic patients should only be considered for prophylactic surgery when the bulla lls one­third of the thoracic cavity because severe and
irreversible complications may develop in such patients (Fig.31.2) [1, 11]. It is better to operate these patients using minimally invasive surgical options to reduce postoperative pain and improve cosmetic outcome if possible (Fig.31.3).
Also, as the compression time of a giant bulla on the intact lung parenchyma increases, paren­chyma’s function is less likely to return to normal even if the lung is fully expanded. The possible reasons for this are the loss of surfactant in the parenchyma without function and the develop­ment of varying degrees of interstitial brosis [11].
31.2.3 Tuberculosis Sequelae
Tuberculosis sequelae develop due to either the damage caused by the disease in the lung paren­chyma or collapse treatment. Lung lesions appear as bronchiectasis, brostenosis, and cavitation, while lymph nodes are characterized by bronchi­olitis. Aspergilloma can develop in these lesions in the parenchymal cavity, or chronic suppurative disease can lead to damaged lungs, making the situation more complicated [12].
374
ab
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
İ. Yalç ınkaya and M. T. Doğruyol
Fig. 31.3 (a) Video thoracoscopic incisions of the patient mentioned in Fig.31.2, (b) pathological specimen image of the same patient
Surgical indications can only be mentioned if symptoms develop in the tuberculosis sequelae. In asymptomatic patients, prophylactic surgery should be considered only in the presence of asper­gilloma. Planned prophylactic surgery in asymp­tomatic patients with aspergilloma signicantly reduces morbidity and mortality. In contrast, emergency surgery of patients with symptoms of acute hemoptysis increases these. Careful hilar dissection for maintaining bronchial blood ow when performing anatomical resection and careful hemostasis to prevent postoperative bleeding is essential. Covering the bronchial stump with sup­porting tissue is vital to avoid stula development if pneumonectomy is performed [13].
lies are diagnosed early in life as cardiac malfor­mations and severe cardiorespiratory symptoms accompany them. However, a small group of patients is not diagnosed until adulthood or may be asymptomatic [
14].
Pulmonary arteriovenous malformations (PAVMs) are characterized by abnormal junc­tions between the pulmonary artery and the vein; their most common cause is Osler–Weber– Rendu disease (hereditary hemorrhagic telangi­ectasia). Most of these patients are diagnosed as they show symptoms. Only a tiny patient popula­tion may be asymptomatic, or the patient may have been diagnosed and is being followed up. Spontaneous arteriovenous stula-induced bleeding may occur in these patients. Iwabuchi etal. reported a case in which emergency thora-
31.2.4 Pulmonary Arteriovenous Malformations
cotomy was performed due to the spontaneous development of intrathoracic hemorrhage in an
asymptomatic patient with PAVM followed up Congenital vascular pathologies may originate from the pulmonary artery, pulmonary vein, or lymphatic vascular system. Most of these anoma-
for 5years and recommended prophylactic sur-
gery, especially in peripheral lesions under the
visceral pleura [
15]. In recent years, arterial
31 Prophylactic Chest Surgery Procedures
375
embolization has also been frequently used to treat these patients [14].
31.2.5 Sequestration
These intrathoracic lesions, which feed from the systemic circulation and have no contribution to breathing, are divided into two groups: intrapul­monary and extrapulmonary. Prophylactic sur­gery is recommended for both types because of the risk of infection, whereas the risk is higher in intrapulmonary lesions [16]. A prophylactic sur­gical indication is also mentioned due to the risk of malignant degeneration in both intrapulmo­nary and extrapulmonary sequestrations [17].
31.2.6 Diaphragmatic Paralysis
A prophylactic plication of the diaphragm can be performed when phrenic nerve injury develops in patients undergoing thoracic surgery, or to reduce future respiratory complications due to a tumor invading the phrenic nerve during the same ses­sion. The results of the prophylactic plication of the phrenic nerve were investigated in the best evidence topic article that examined a total of 4 studies with 37 patients plus 2 animal studies. It is reported that plication with phrenic nerve injury reduced the postoperative radiological dia­phragmatic paralysis image, the shortness of breath, and the need for a ventilator. The pre­dicted values of the respiratory function of patients who underwent lung resection and dia­phragmatic plication in the same session were consistent with the measured postoperative val­ues. The authors concluded that a diaphragmatic plication could be performed during surgery if the phrenic nerve was injured or sacriced [18]. In the extended resection study of Tokunaga etal. [19] conducted with 13 patients, one of the stud­ies examined in the aforementioned best evidence topic article, postoperative complications did not develop in 77% of patients. Further, it was emphasized that no diaphragmatic paralysis occurred clinically or radiologically in any patient during the postoperative period [19].
Takahashi etal. (2018) reported a case in which
the patient underwent left upper lobectomy and
plication with VATS because the left upper lobe
lung cancer invaded the phrenic nerve [20].
The situation is similar in cases with pneumo­nectomy. Another best evidence topic article that examined four studies reported that the plication of the hemidiaphragm due to the development of paralysis after pneumonectomy reduced respira­tory failure. This result was because a preserved phrenic nerve after pneumonectomy can function for up to 11years, and plication mimics such a function [21].
31.3 Precancerous Pathologies
One of the main topics related to thoracic sur­gery in terms of malignancy is lung cancer. Although genetic predisposition is involved in lung cancer development, tobacco use is the most common etiological cause of lung cancer [22]. Other etiological factors, such as passive smoking, air pollution, workplace exposure, and genetic sensitivity, should not be ignored. In recent years, an individual who has never smoked in his life is thought to have an increased ten­dency to have lung cancer. Adenocarcinomas mostly occur in these individuals. These tumors contain mutations more prone to targeted ther­apy compared with lung cancer in smokers [23].
We can easily make an inference with today’s knowledge that no hereditay tumor in thoracic surgery is suitable for prophylactic surgery for reasons, such as the lung being a vital organ, very small genetic predisposition in the tumor’s etiol­ogy, and not knowing in which part of the lung the tumor may develop, even if it is predicted. However, prophylactic surgical indications can be counted in benign or premalignant lesions of almost all thoracic structures, including lung parenchyma.
31.3.1 Benign Chest Wall Tumors
The only prophylactic surgical indications for benign chest wall tumors are for osteochondroma
376
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
İ. Yalç ınkaya and M. T. Doğruyol
and chondroma. Unlike other benign ribcage tumors, these tumors have a risk of malignant degeneration. Osteochondroma is a small, slow­growing tumor. The risk of malignant degenera­tion after surgery is eliminated, and recurrence has not been reported [24]. It may be challenging to distinguish chondromas from early-grade chon­drosarcoma, even under a microscope. Therefore, resection with a minimum of a 2cm surgical mar­gin is recommended at the time of diagnosis [25].
31.3.2 Benign Pleural Tumors
Although solitary brous tumors are benign, they should be treated surgically after diagnosis because of the risk of developing Doege–Potter syndrome (which may be fatal), the possibility of malignant transformation, and the potential of rapid growth after many years of follow-up [26
28]. Surgical margins should be observed during
resection, and patients should be followed up by CT for many years to prevent recurrence [29, 30].
A condition called reactive mesothelial hyper­plasia with recurrent pleural effusion has been described in the literature [31]. In people with asbestos exposure, in situ mesothelial lesions, which are considered as the precursor of meso­thelioma, have also been shown. Malignant pleu­ral and peritoneal mesotheliomas have been reported in a patient diagnosed with atypical mesothelial hyperplasia 8 years later [32]. Histologically important characteristics, degree of mesothelial proliferation, supercial invasion, uniform mild cytological atypia, and mesothelial proliferation reasons other than asbestos have been put forward for patients with atypical meso­thelial hyperplasia. However, no information is available on whether to perform preventive decortication in patients with these characteris­tics and how it affects the process.
Also, pleura-induced thymomas, well­differentiated papillary mesotheliomas, and des­moid tumors with low malignancy potential can be treated with prophylactic surgery after diagnosis [33].
31.3.3 Congenital Lung Malformations
Severe respiratory distress develops in most patients with congenital pulmonary airway mal­formation (CPAM). However, a small portion of patients may remain asymptomatic. Although surgery is undeniable for symptomatic patients, no consensus exists on whether to perform pro­phylactic surgery in asymptomatic ones [34].
Hsu etal. (2019) examined the development of cancer gene mutation in patients with CPAM and reported that these patients carried a higher risk than the healthy population, and prophy­lactic surgery might be an option [35]. Malignant transformation is not uncommon in asymptomatic patients, and malignancy may develop even after many follow-ups [36]. Thus, it was emphasized that aggressive prophylactic surgery is acceptable, and low morbidity pre­vails over the risk of malignancy [37]. In a study in which parenchymal prophylactic sur­gery (segmentectomy or atypical resection) was performed in 50 patients, prophylactic sublobar resection was suggested to be performed within the rst 6 months, if possible, with VATS, in asymptomatic patients [38]. Similarly, Moyer etal. (2017) reported that prophylactic surgery might be performed with VATS within the rst 6months of life or later due to the risk of malig­nancy and infection development [39]. Another study reported that prophylactic surgery for congenital lung cysts did not prevent the devel­opment of pleuropulmonary blastoma. However, resection was still suggested in all pediatric patients with lung cysts due to the presence of risk [40].
Opposing views exist for prophylactic surgery in patients with CPAM.Two patients with right lung agenesis, aged 44days and 3months, were approached with the conservative treatment method; aggressive surgical intervention was avoided. Both patients responded very well to the conservative treatment method. These studies emphasized that prophylactic surgery should not be performed in asymptomatic patients [41, 42].
31 Prophylactic Chest Surgery Procedures
377
31.3.4 Miscellaneous Conditions
Thymic carcinoid is rarely seen and mostly asso­ciated with multiple endocrine neoplasia type-1 (MEN-1) disease. Of all thymic carcinoids reported in the literature, 25% are related to MEN-1. Thus, a prophylactic thymectomy is suggested for patients undergoing subtotal or total parathyroidectomy [43].
Another condition that requires a thymectomy related to the parathyroid gland is parathyroid hyperplasia. In this disease, some of the recur­rences after parathyroidectomy have been reported to occur from the parathyroid glands in the thymus gland. Therefore, a prophylactic thy­mectomy has been suggested, especially during parathyroidectomy in kidney-induced parathy­roid hyperplasia [44].
Upper mediastinal lymph node metastasis is often observed in papillary thyroid carcinoma. Therefore, prophylactic upper mediastinal lymph node dissection with a sternotomy suggestion has been brought up for these patients. In a study investigating the necessity of prophylactic upper mediastinal lymph node dissection with a ster­notomy, no difference in survival and disease­free survival was observed between groups with and without prophylactic dissection. Thus, this method was not recommended [45].
31.4 Conclusions
The development of anesthesia and surgical tech­niques paved the way for surgeries to be per­formed in less time and with less morbidity. Even major surgeries, which were described in recent case studies and could not be performed earlier due to high risk, can now be done using mini­mally invasive techniques. These developments can increase the examples of prophylactic inter­ventions in thoracic surgery and enhance their application by thoracic surgeons.
References
1. Venuta F, Diso D, Rendina EA. Pneumothorax. In: LoCicero III J, Feins RH, Colson YL, Rocco G, editors. Shields’ general thoracic surgery. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2019. p.1473–93.
2. Tschopp JM, Rami-Porta R, Noppen M, Astoul P. Management of spontaneous pneumothorax: state of the art. Eur Respir J. 2006;28(3):637–50.
3. Muramatsu T, Nishii T, Takeshita S, Ishimoto S, Morooka H, Shiono M.Preventing recurrence of spon­taneous pneumothorax after thoracoscopic surgery: a review of recent results. Surg Today. 2010;40:696–9.
4. Young Choi S, Beom Park C, Wha Song S, Hwan Kim Y, Cheol Jeong S, Soo Kim K, etal. What factors predict recurrence after an initial episode of primary spontaneous pneumothorax in children? Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;20(6):961–7.
5. Nathan N, Guilbert J, Larroquet M, Lenoir M, Clement A, Epaud R.Efcacy of blebs detection for preventive surgery in children’s idiopathic spontane­ous pneumothorax. World J Surg. 2010;34(1):185–9.
6. Chou SH, Li HP, Lee JY, Chang SJ, Lee YL, Chang YT, etal. Is prophylactic treatment of contralateral blebs in patients with primary spontaneous pneu­mothorax indicated? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;139(5):1241–5.
7. Chen YY, Huang HK, Chang H, Lee SC, Huang TW.Postoperative predictors of ipsilateral and contra­lateral recurrence in patients with primary spontaneous pneumothorax. J Thorac Dis. 2016;8(11):3217–24.
8. Sihoe AD, Yim AP, Lee TW, Wan S, Yuen EH, Wan IY, et al. Can CT scanning be used to select patients with unilateral primary spontaneous pneumothorax for bilateral surgery? Chest. 2000;118(2):380–3.
9. Liu YW, Chang PC, Chang SJ, Chiang HH, Li HP, Chou SH.Simultaneous bilateral thoracoscopic blebs excision reduces contralateral recurrence in patients undergoing operation for ipsilateral primary spon­taneous pneumothorax. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020;159(3):1120–7.
10. Li X, Wang X, Zhang H, Cheng H, Cao Q.Unilateral single-port thoracoscopic surgery for bilateral pneu­mothorax or pulmonary bullae. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019;14(1):71.
11. Chughtai T, Perron E, Simon M, Deslauriers J.Bullous and bleb diseases of the lung. In: Shields TW, LoCicero III J, Reed CE, Feins RH, editors. General thoracic surgery. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2009. p.1082–3.
12. Massard G, Olland A, Santelmo N, Falcoz PE.Pulmonary tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases of the lung. In: LoCicero III J, Feins RH,
378
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
İ. Yalç ınkaya and M. T. Doğruyol
Colson YL, Rocco G, editors. Shields’ general tho­racic surgery. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer;
2019. p.2143.
13. Massard G, Olland A, Santelmo N, Falcoz PE.Surgery for the sequelae of postprimary tuberculosis. Thorac Surg Clin. 2012;22(3):287–300.
14. Bobbio A, Berteloot L, Lupo A, Alifano M.Congenital vascular lesions of the lungs. In: LoCicero III J, Feins RH, Colson YL, Rocco G, editors. Shields’ gen­eral thoracic surgery. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2019. p.1977–9.
15. Iwabuchi S, Horikoshi A, Okada S, Tanita T, Fujimura S.Intrapleural rupture of a pulmonary arteriovenous stula occurring just beneath the pleura: report of a case. Surg Today. 1993;23(5):468–70.
16. Halkic N, Cuénoud PF, Corthésy ME, Ksontini R, Boumghar M.Pulmonary sequestration: a review of 26 cases. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1998;14(2):127–33.
17. Bobbio A, Berteloot L, Guinet C, Alifano M. Congenital parenchymal lesions of the lungs. In: LoCicero III J, Feins RH, Colson YL, Rocco G, editors. Shields’ general thoracic surgery. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2019. p.1907–13.
18. Beattie GW, Dunn WG, Asif M. In patients with a tumour invading the phrenic nerve does prophy­lactic diaphragm plication improve postoperative lung function? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016;23(3):454–8.
19. Tokunaga T, Sawabata N, Kadota Y, Utsumi T, Minami M, Inoue M, etal. Efcacy of intra-operative unilateral diaphragm plication for patients undergoing unilateral phrenicotomy during extended surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010;38(5):600–3.
20. Takahashi Y, Miyajima M, Mishina T, Maki R, Tada M, Tsuruta K, etal. Thoracoscopic one-stage lobec­tomy and diaphragmatic plication for T3 lung cancer. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018;13(1):86.
21. Burns J, Dunning J.Is the preservation of the phrenic nerve important after pneumonectomy? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2011;12(1):47–50.
22. Lynch HT, Lynch JF.Hereditary cancer: family his­tory, diagnosis, molecular genetics, ecogenetics, and management strategies. Biochimie. 2002;84(1):3–17.
23. Rivera GA, Wakelee H.Lung cancer in never smok­ers. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2016;893:43–57.
24. Nicastri DG, Swati GN, Williams EE, Flores RM, Jones DR. Chest wall tumors. In: LoCicero III J, Feins RH, Colson YL, Rocco G, editors. Shields’ gen­eral thoracic surgery. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2019. p.1337–41.
25. Shah AA, D’Amico TA.Primary chest wall tumors. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;210:360–6.
26. Scrimgeour LA, Grada Z, Aswad BI, Ng T. Lessons learned from an untreated “benign” thoracic tumor. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017;103(2):e135–7.
27. Meng W, Zhu HH, Li H, Wang G, Wei D, Feng X.Solitary brous tumors of the pleura with Doege­Potter syndrome: a case report and three-decade review of the literature. BMC Res Notes. 2014;11(7):515.
28. Okimoto T, Horimasu Y, Hamaguchi S, Sutani A, Amano C, Harada Y, etal. Solitary brous tumor with
rapid progression after 16 years’ follow up. Intern Med. 2014;53(6):617–21.
29. Ali JM, Ali A, Van Leuven M, Bartosik WR.Giant solitary brous tumour of the pleura an unpredictable entity: case series and literature review. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2017;99(6):e165–71.
30. Chen M, Yang J, Zhu L, Zhao H.Intrathoracic giant pleural lipoma: case report and review of the litera­ture. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;8:196.
31. Henderson DW, Shilkin KB, Whitaker D. Reactive mesothelial hyperplasia vs mesothelioma, includ­ing mesothelioma in situ: a brief review. Am J Clin Pathol. 1998;110(3):397–404.
32. Scurry J, Duggan MA.Malignant mesothelioma eight years after a diagnosis of atypical mesothelial hyper­plasia. J Clin Pathol. 1999;52(7):535–7.
33. McNamee CJ. Benign tumors of the pleura. In: Sugarbaker DJ, Bueno R, Krasna MJ, Mentzer SJ, Zellos L, editors. Adult chest surgery. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2009. p.925–9.
34. Vidal I, Wildhaber BE, Moehrlen U, Regamey N, Trachsel D, Cholewa D, etal. A Swiss database and biobank to better understand and manage congenital lung anomalies. Swiss Med Wkly. 2019;149:w20081.
35. Hsu JS, Zhang R, Yeung F, Tang CSM, Wong JKL, So MT, etal. Cancer gene mutations in congenital pul­monary airway malformation patients. ERJ Open Res. 2019;5(1):00196-2018.
36. Casagrande A, Pederiva F.Association between con­genital lung malformations and lung tumors in chil­dren and adults: a systematic review. J Thorac Oncol. 2016;11(11):1837–45.
37. Ribet ME, Copin MC, Gosselin BH.Bronchogenic cysts of the lung. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996;61:1636–40.
38. Fascetti-Leon F, Gobbi D, Pavia SV, Aquino A, Ruggeri G, Gregori G, et al. Sparing-lung surgery for the treatment of congenital lung malformations. J Pediatr Surg. 2013;48(7):1476–80.
39. Moyer J, Lee H, Vu L. Thoracoscopic lobec­tomy for congenital lung lesions. Clin Perinatol. 2017;44(4):781–94.
40. Papagiannopoulos KA, Sheppard M, Bush AP, Goldstraw P. Pleuropulmonary blastoma: is prophy­lactic resection of congenital lung cysts effective? Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;72(2):604–5.
41. Xie L, Zhao J, Shen J.Clinical diagnostic approach to congenital agenesis of right lung with dextrocardia: a case report with review of literature. Clin Respir J. 2016;10(6):805–8.
42. Kumar B, Kandpal DK, Sharma C, Sinha DD.Right lung agenesis. Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2008;5(2):102–4.
43. Teh BT.Thymic carcinoids in multiple endocrine neo­plasia type 1. J Intern Med. 1998;243(6):501–4.
44. Boltz MM, Zhang N, Zhao C, Thiruvengadam S, Siperstein AE, Jin J.Value of prophylactic cervical thymectomy in parathyroid hyperplasia. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(Suppl 3):S662–8.
45. Kikumori T, Imai T. Insignicance of prophylactic upper mediastinal lymph node dissection by ster­notomy for papillary thyroid carcinoma. Endocr J. 2011;58(12):1093–8.
Prophylactic Surgery forUrologic Pathologies
YiğitAkın, MariaDelPilarLaguna, andJeanDe La Rosetta
32
32.1 Introduction
Prophylactic surgery is also known as preventa­tive surgery. It is novel for urologic surgery liter­ature. Herein, we described “prophylactic surgery for urologic pathologies” according to published literature. Additionally, to our best knowledge, this is the rst chapter for this issue in the litera­ture. However, organ-preserving surgical modali­ties are very important urologic surgical procedures, and there is a separate place of pro­phylactic surgery.
We divided the genitourinary system anatomi­cally and dened prophylactic surgery for uro­logic pathologies. We hope that this pioneer section would be a useful guide for clinicians.
Y. Akın (*) Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Izmir, Turkey e-mail: yigit.akin@ikcu.edu.tr
M. D. P. Laguna · J. De La Rosetta Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey e-mail: plaguna@medipol.edu.tr;
jdelarosette@medipol.edu.tr
32.2 Upper Urinary Tract
32.2.1 Kidney Surgery
32.2.1.1 Preventive Nephrectomy
Both kidneys are valuable for homeostasis in the human body. However, one of them can be enough to survive without dialysis, and occasion­ally, bilateral nephrectomies should be performed for prophylaxis. This is sometimes indicated in association with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) managed with kidney transplantation [1]. However, ESRD is the part above the water, chronic kidney disease (CKD) is the part of an iceberg under the water. ESRD due to vesicoure­teral reux (VUR) is a prevalent notably in the paediatric population [2]. In this section, we described ESRD due to VUR.The importance of xing VUR is described in another section below. However, it can be managed by medication, and when ESRD occurs, bilateral nephrectomies come into question. Of course, the suitable indi­cations for the prophylaxis word are presented in the literature. This surgical procedure is per­formed as a prophylaxis for avoiding complica­tions after kidney transplantation. The VUR process mostly begins from the prenatal period. Sargent revealed that 1/3 of patients who had a urinary tract infection (UTI) have VUR, and 9–20% of patients with prenatal hydronephrosis have VUR when tested in the postnatal period [3]. The VUR mentioned herein is primary VUR or secondary VUR, which is the cause of poste-
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021 O. N. Dilek et al. (eds.), Prophylactic Surgery, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66853-2_32
379
380
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Y. Ak ın et al.
rior urethral valve disease and/or lower urinary tract obstruction from the neurogenic origin, such as spina bida. As a result, ESRD can be occurred due to VUR. Sometimes, VUR causes reux nephropathy (RN), and indirectly, RN brings CKD, and a small number of patients progress to ESRD [4]. However, ESRD is rare in the paediat­ric population when it could not be managed with both medical and surgical treatments; as the most serious consequence, ESRD might be developed. Radiological examinations can easily show the degree of VUR (Fig. 32.1). Additionally, the VUR has been announced as one of the common causes of ESRD in children, in 2007, in USA [5].
The necessity of performing bilateral nephrec­tomy is for the prevention of complications after transplantation. Grade 5 VUR can cause voiding problems and UTI. Therefore, impaired urody­namic status can easily damage transplant kidney [6]. This can be performed before transplanta­tion, meanwhile with transplantation. Papalois etal. (2000) reported that there was not any sig­nicant difference between preoperative or simultaneous patients who underwent bilateral native nephrectomy [7]. Fuller etal. found simi­lar ndings with them [8]. In addition, Ismail etal. noted that patients with simultaneous native
nephrectomies and transplantation would need additional surgeries in short-term follow-up [9]. On the other hand, Glassman et al. (2000) reported higher patient satisfaction for concomi­tant native bilateral nephrectomy and renal trans­plant [10]. Kim et al. (2016) reported a higher risk of vascular diseases after concomitant sur­gery [11]. Elrggal etal. (2018) analysed all these in a review and found out that there are more advantages of concomitant surgery [12]. Over and above, when the laparoscopic nephrectomy is performed, the advantages could increase in the favour of the patients without and complica­tions of graft kidneys [13].
One more point, when bilateral native nephrec­tomy is performed, bilateral ureters can be used for bladder augmentation [14]. Bellinger described the surgical technique [15]. Vascular source of the augmented ureters is always con­cerned. However, Kajbafzadeh et al. (2010) reported preserving vascularity of the ureter for augmentation [16].
Finally, simultaneous laparoscopic bilateral native nephrectomy and kidney transplantation seem safe in ESRD patients with grade 5 VUR [17]. Native ureters can also be used for bladder augmentation, especially in children. Bilateral native nephrectomy can be assumed as prophy­lactic urological surgery for upper urinary tract.
32.2.1.2 Genetic Diseases
Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is a hereditary disorder, in which the ADPKD-1 or ADPKD-2 gene is mutated. Thus, synthesis of polycystin 1 or polycystin 2 proteins are changed [
18]. Briey, renal parenchyma is
destructed by a renal cyst, which may become a huge size in the progress of the disease. ESRD occurs and half of the patients need dialysis or renal transplantation at the age of 60years [19]. Sometimes, even the patient does not need renal replacement; it can take up a lot of space in the abdomen and make it difcult for the patient to breathe by pressing the diaphragm. Additionally, potential complications that may arise from
Fig. 32.1 A voiding cystourethrography of a patient with end-stage kidney disease. Grade 5 vesicoureteral reux according to International Reux grading system
pressure on other intra-abdominal organs are not the subject of this chapter.
32 Prophylactic Surgery forUrologic Pathologies
381
Prophylactic nephrectomies come into ques­tion for patients with ADPKD notably, and they are listed in renal transplant. Sulikowski et al. (2009) evaluated ADPKD patients and making nephrectomies before, during and after renal transplant [20]. Moreover, Rozanski etal. (2005) agreed with them, as in the case of whom just ipsilateral nephrectomy is required; it should be performed before kidney transplant [21]. Laparoscopic nephrectomy is preferable; how­ever, the size of the kidney might not be suitable for these surgical approaches. If the kidney size is over 15cm, surgeons should consider this situa­tion, as technical difculties may occur [22].
Evaluation of all, we can easily suggest that bilateral, preferably laparoscopic, nephrectomy can be performed simultaneously with kidney transplantation in ADPKD patients.
32.2.2 Ureter Surgery
The VUR is dened as reux of urine from the bladder to the ureter and/or renal pelvis [23]. VUR may lead to different clinical reections, especially in children. VUR affects 1% of chil­dren, and it mostly causes UTI.If it is not been treated, it may lead to pyelonephritis, renal scar­ring and chronic renal insufciency [24]. Recently, VUR is often questioned in children who have had a UTI. Contemporary surgical treatment is performed by endoscopic injection of non-animal dextranomer–hyaluronic acid [25]. Peters etal. described the endoscopic tech­nique [26]. The success of treatment was dened as complete resolution of reux when no VUR was demonstrated in voiding cystourethrogra­phy. Follow-up visits were stopped in the outpa­tient clinic for successfully treated children. Children who had persistent VUR were recom­mended reinjections [27]. Yu et al. (2006) reported the very successful rate of endoscopic treatment of VUR [28]. The endoscopic treat­ment can avoid complications of VUR, such as UTI.This is not meant to provide prophylactic endoscopic VUR treatment to every child with UTI. However, detailed clinical evaluation
should be performed for this patient population. Indications of surgical intervention for VUR are listed by European Urology Guidelines on Paediatrics [29]. Our aim is just to consider urol­ogists to diagnose and to treat VUR in its indications.
32.3 Lower Urinary Tract
32.3.1 Bladder Surgery
32.3.1.1 Bladder Diverticula
Bladder diverticula are typically classied as either congenital or acquired [30]. Acquired one can occur due to bladder outlet obstruction or neurogenic bladder. Most of the bladder diver­ticula are asymptomatic and are commonly dis­covered during the investigation for haematuria, lower urinary tract symptoms or infection. However, some can also be found incidentally during radiographic examinations [31].
Bladder diverticula can be managed in differ­ent ways, including conservative non-operative management, surgical excision and endoscopic management. Indications for treating bladder diverticula include urinary infection, stones or malignancy. Of course, malignancy needs to be managed according to tumour types and levels. Endoscopic management includes fulguration [32]. Surgical management includes, basically, excision of the diverticula [33]. In the case of some clinical ndings that are listed above, surgi­cal/endoscopic treatment of bladder diverticula can provide clinical improvement in patients. Additionally, bladder diverticula do not have a muscular wall beyond the mucosal layer. This potentially can be resulted in increased risk for extension of possible malignancy outside the bladder. Thus, prophylactic diverticulectomy can avoid this. However, laparoscopic and/robotic­assisted laparoscopic operative techniques have been announced as safe and effective for surgical treatment of bladder diverticula [34]. Endoscopic or surgical intervention should be preferred according to diverticula and the patient’s clinical situation [35].