Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_2806_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана
.pdf
Health-Related Quality ofLife
Outcomes forEndovascular
andOpen Surgical Interventions
inAortoiliac andFemoropopliteal
Steno-Occlusive Arterial Disease
JimmyKyawTun, StefanLam,
MohammedRashidAkhtar, andOunaliJaer
19
Abbreviations
ABPI Ankle-brachial pressure index
BMT Best medical therapy
CD-TLR Clinically-driven target lesion revas-
cularisation
CERAB Covered endovascular repair of aor-
tic bifurcation
CLTI Critical limb-threatening ischaemia
DCB Drug-coated balloon
DES Drug-eluting stent
EQ EuroQoL
HRQOL Health-related quality of life
ICQ Intermittent claudication question-
naire
MCID Minimal clinically important differ-
ence
OCT Optical coherence tomography
J. K. Tun · M. R. Akhtar · O. Jaffer (*)
Department of Interventional Radiology, Royal
London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust,
London, UK
e-mail: jimmy.kyawtun@nhs.net;
mohammedrashid.akhtar@nhs.net;
ounali.jaffer@nhs.net
S. Lam
Barts and the London School of Medicine &
Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London,
London, UK
e-mail: stefan.lam@nhs.net
PAD Peripheral arterial disease
PAQ Peripheral arterial questionnaire
PTA Percutaneous transluminal angio-
plasty
QALY Quality-adjusted life year
RCT Randomised controlled trial
SF Short form
SFA Supercial femoral artery
SET Supervised exercise therapy
WIQ Walking impairment questionnaire
Introduction
There is an impending epidemic in peripheral
arterial disease (PAD), largely due to an aging
population and increased rates of obesity and diabetes, with the condition currently prevalent in
5.6% of the adult population worldwide.
Sufferers of PAD often experience a decreased
quality of life and reduced functional independence. The symptoms experienced depend on
disease severity and range from limited walking
distance in claudicants, to rest pain and tissue
loss with risk of major amputation in those with
critical limb-threating ischaemia (CLTI) [1]. The
quality of life in those with PAD is often further
degraded by concomitant related disorders
including hypertension, dyslipidaemia, diabetes
and nephropathy [2].
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022
T. Athanasiou et al. (eds.), Patient Reported Outcomes and Quality of Life in Cardiovascular Interventions,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09815-4_19
361

362
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
J. K. Tun et al.
There is an ever-increasing armamentarium
available for lower limb revascularisation, particularly in terms of endovascular treatment with
the advent of drug-coated balloons (DCB) and
drug-eluting stents (DES) to atherectomy and
lithotripsy; but these innovations also come with
signicantly increased costs. It is therefore necessary to evaluate both clinical effectiveness and
health economics of these interventions.
Conventionally, studies evaluating lower limb
interventions have focused on physicianorientated outcome measures such as technical
success (e.g. successful revascularisation of an
occluded artery), patency rates, ankle-brachial
pressure index (ABPI), freedom from clinicallydriven target lesion revascularisation (CD-TLR)
and freedom from amputation [1]. However,
these measures alone do not take into account the
patient’s perspective. For instance, vascular clinicians generally consider major amputation to be
an adverse outcome in PAD, yet it has been
shown that health-related quality of life (HRQOL)
can improve following major amputations [3]. A
systematic review comparing primary amputations and revascularisation in CLTI found insufcient evidence to support one treatment over
another in terms of HRQOL outcomes [4].
There is an increasing recognition for the need
to evaluate HRQOL outcomes for intervention in
PAD to take into account the patient’s perspective
to better inform treatment decisions [5]. This is
emphasised by the use of quality-adjusted life
years (QALYs) by the National Institute for
Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) for health
technology assessment. In order to generate
QALYs, health utilities (or HRQOL weights) are
needed. As such, the measure is reliant on both
the quality and the quantity of the life lived in
order to determine health outcomes and therefore
health economics.
The focus of this study is to present a systematic review of the current evidence of HRQOL
outcomes in relation to endovascular and open
surgical treatment of aortoiliac and femoropopliteal steno-occlusive disease. A review of the evidence for intervention in infrapopliteal disease is
presented in Chap. 20.
Materials andMethods
Search Strategy
This systematic review was conducted according
to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for
Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The initial search strategy focused on identifying papers based on specic interventions
(e.g. iliac angioplasty, aortoiliac bypass graft).
However, on manual review of the references of
several key systematic reviews, it was evident
that this search strategy omitted some relevant
papers. Therefore, a much broader search strategy was employed as follows.
A systematic search using Embase (Including
Embase Classic) (1947 to February 2020),
Medline (1946 to February 2020) and PsycINFO
(1950 to February 2020) was conducted. The
search terms used were as follows: “quality of
life” AND (“peripheral arterial disease” OR
“peripheral vascular disease” OR “intermittent
claudication” OR “critical limb ischaemia” OR
“critical limb ischemia”).
Inclusion andExclusion Criteria
Studies published in the English language reporting HRQOL outcomes in adults undergoing invasive intervention—i.e. both open and
endovascular surgery—for steno-occlusive disease in the aortoiliac and femoropopliteal segments were sought. Although the primary focus
of this review was to evaluate the outcomes of
invasive interventions, studies comparing noninvasive treatments such as supervised exercise
therapy (SET) and best medical treatment (BMT)
to invasive interventions were also included.
Studies were only included if they presented
results specic to an anatomical segment. Papers
which included patients treated across a range of
anatomical segments were excluded if outcome
data specic to an anatomical segment (aortoiliac
or femoropopliteal) was not available. If the
study included distal (below knee) intervention
and/or distal bypass surgery, then these were also

19 Health-Related Quality of Life Outcomes for Endovascular and Open Surgical Interventions…
363
excluded. Studies were excluded if they had less
than 6months follow-up data.
Study Selection andData Extraction
The broad search criteria yielded an initial extensive list of abstracts. Therefore, one researcher
(JKT) performed an initial screening of abstracts
to remove articles that were clearly irrelevant. A
second stage review of the full texts of the
remaining articles was then performed by JKT
and MRA and where there was uncertainty or difference in opinion, adjudication was performed
by a third reviewer (OJ).
Data obtained included: author, year of publication, study objective, study type, number of
patients, study centre location, HRQOL outcomes, follow-up period and completion rates.
The methodological quality of the studies was
assessed by SL and MRA using a 10-point scoring system described by Mols etal. [6] Studies
scoring ≥8 were considered to be of ‘high quality’, those scoring between 5 and 7 were deemed
to be of a ‘moderate quality’ and <5 were categorized as ‘poor quality’ (Appendix).
Results
The literature search initially identied 3284
abstracts (reduced from 4893 following deduplication and limiting to English language studies in
adult humans). In total, 89 papers remained after
the initial screening process. Two additional
studies were added following the review of reference lists of published related systematic reviews.
Following the second stage review, 38 papers
were included in this study (Fig.19.1).
Study Objectives, Design
andPopulation
Of the 38 papers selected for review, there were
four pairs of papers which reported the longer
and shorter term follow-up outcomes of the same
studies, and thus were merged for analysis (34
studies in total) [7–14].
The study period ranged from 1993 to 2017,
with the majority of included papers published
after 2000 (33 out of 34). The clinical study
design of the 34 studies included 15 randomised
controlled trials (RCTs), 17 prospective cohort
studies and two retrospective cohort studies.
Eight studies were related to intervention in the
aortoiliac segment, 25 studies were related to
intervention in the femoropopliteal segment,
and one additional paper studied interventions
in both the aortoiliac and femoropopliteal
segments.
Health-Related Quality ofLife
Outcome Measures
A total of nine different QOL instruments were
used (Table19.1). Five generic QOL instruments
were used including: EuroQol (EQ)-5D-3L,
EQ-5D-5L, RAND-36, Short form (SF)-36,
SF-12, SF-8. Four disease specic QOL instruments were used including: Walking Impairment
Questionnaire (WIQ), Peripheral Arterial
Questionnaire (PAQ), VascuQOL and Intermittent
Claudication Questionnaire (ICQ).
Many papers reported using the EuroQOL
instrument but did not specify which variant was
used, e.g. EQ-5D-3L versus EQ-5D-5L.
Studies Focused onAortoiliac StenoOcclusive Disease
Nine studies were identied which focused on
surgical and/or endovascular interventions for
aortoiliac steno-occlusive disease. Details of outcomes are shown in Table19.2.
One prospective multicentre observational
study investigating outcomes of patients who had
undergone endovascular intervention (angioplasty and/or stenting) for Rutherford 2–4 aortoiliac disease demonstrated signicant
improvements in HRQOL outcome at the
12-month follow-up compared to baseline [16].

364
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
J. K. Tun et al.
ScreeningIncluded Eligibility Identification
Same studies with
different follow-up times
merged for analysis
Records identified through
database searching
(n = 4893)
Records after duplicates and non-English
Full-text articles assessed
(n = 4)
studies removed
(n = 3286)
Records screened
(n = 91)
for eligibility
(n = 38)
Studies included in
systematic review
(n = 34)
Additional records identified
through reference lists
(n = 2)
Records excluded
(n = 3195)
Full-text articles excluded
(n = 53)
Reasons for exclusion:-
- No outcome data specific
to segments of interest
- Inclusion of distal (below
knee) intervention and/or
distal bypass surgery
- Less than 6 months of
follow-up data
Studies on aortoiliac
interventions
(n = 8)
Fig. 19.1 Flow diagram of literature review
Studies on femoropopliteal
interventions
(n = 25)
A further three multicentre prospective cohort
studies specically investigated the use of
primary stenting with bare metal stent for aortoiliac disease [17–19]. All three demonstrated an
improvement in HRQOL measures at follow-up.
An RCT published in 2015 compared three
treatment arms: BMT, stenting with BMT, and
SET with BMT. The study demonstrated that
patients who received either stenting or SET had
signicantly better HRQOL than those whom
received BMT alone at both the 6- and 18-month
follow-up timepoints [14]. No signicant difference in HRQOL outcomes was seen between the
SET and stenting group. Another RCT comparing percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA)
combined with SET and BMT to BMT combined
with SET demonstrated better HRQOL outcomes
in the PTA group at 24-month follow-up [22].
Studies on interventions
at both segments
(n = 1)

19 Health-Related Quality of Life Outcomes for Endovascular and Open Surgical Interventions…
Table 19.1 Description of health-related quality of life instruments utilised by included studies
Health-related quality of life
(HRQOL) instrument Description
Short Form Health Survey
(SF-36, SF-12, SF-8)
Walking Impairment
Questionnaire (WIQ)
EuroQol Five Dimensions
(EQ-5D)
RAND 36-item Health
Survey (RAND-36)
Peripheral Artery
Questionnaire (PAQ)
Vascular Quality of Life
Questionnaire (VascuQoL)
Intermittent Claudication
Questionnaire (ICQ)
SF-36—A 36-item, patient- reported survey of patient health status consisting of eight
domains: Vitality, Physical functioning, Bodily pain, General health perceptions,
Physical role functioning, Emotional role functioning, Social role functioning and
Mental health (summarised physical and mental component scores are also
calculated). Each domain is scored on a 0–100 scale, with a lower score representing
greater disability.
SF-12 and SF-8—Shortened versions of SF-36 with 12 and 8 items respectively,
evaluating the same eight domains.
A subjective measure of patient- reported walking performance in patients with
peripheral arterial disease consisting of three domains: Walking distance, Walking
speed and Stair-climbing ability (a total mean score is also calculated). Each domain
is scored from 0% to 100%, with a lower percentage representing a poorer walking
performance.
A self-reported, standardized instrument for measuring generic health status
consisting of ve dimensions: Mobility, Self-care, Usual activities, Pain/discomfort,
and Anxiety/depression—each dimension is rated on a three-level (EQ-5D-3L) or
ve-level (EQ-5D-5L) scale based on severity. An evaluation of overall health is done
on the day of questionnaire completion using a Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS)—
this is indicated on a vertical scale from 0 to 100.
This instrument utilises the same 36-item questionnaire as SF-36 and evaluates the
same eight domains with minor differences in scoring the General health perceptions
and Bodily pain scales.
A 20-item, patient-reported peripheral artery disease-specic HRQOL questionnaire
consisting of six domains (Physical limitation, Symptoms, Symptom stability, Social
limitation, Treatment satisfaction and Quality of life) and a summary score. Each
domain is scored on a 0–100 scale, with higher scores indicating less functional
limitation, fewer symptoms, better treatment satisfaction, higher social functioning,
and better health status.
VQ-25—A 25-item patient- reported peripheral artery disease-specic HRQOL
questionnaire consisting of ve domains (Activities, Symptoms, Pain, Social life,
Emotions) and an overall (mean) score. Each item is scored on a 7-point response
scale, with higher scores indicating better HRQOL.
VQ-6—A 6-item, short form of VQ-25 evaluating the same domains except on a
4-point response scale.
A 16-item self-administered intermittent claudication-specic HRQOL instrument
evaluating severity of pain, limitations on activities of daily living, emotional impact
and interference with activities. Each item is assessed on a 5-point adjectival scale
and scored between 0 and 100 (0=worst, 100=best).
365
One paper presented a direct comparison of
two endovascular procedures within an RCT
study design. The trial compared stenting to PTA
and demonstrated improvement in HRQOL outcomes in both groups at 24-month follow-up, but
no signicant difference between the two groups
[20]. Of the remaining two papers relating to
intervention in the aortoiliac segment, one prospective cohort study demonstrated improved
HRQOL measures at 6months following laparo-
scopic aorto-bifemoral bypass surgery [15];
while the other retrospective observational
study—which compared stenting to aortobifemoral bypass surgery—demonstrated no signicant difference in HRQOL outcomes between
the groups [21]. However, subgroup analysis did
reveal signicantly improved outcomes in the
endovascular group compared to the surgical
group in one item of the WIQ questionnaire (difculty in walking 150m).

366
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Quality
score
8
Main ndings related to
HRQOL
Statistically signicant
improvement from baseline
with LABFB for
HRQOL
instrument(s) used,
method of delivery,
completion rate Key outcomes
was found in all domains as
well as in the summary scores.
Substantial at 1month,
sustained until 6month
Trans-Atlantic
Inter-Society
Consensus II,
type D lesions
follow-up.
showed signicant
improvement at all the
postoperative survey time
points as compared to the
preoperative scores, whereas
have substantial
and statistically
signicant
improvement in
the patients’
HRQL.
Not stated The PCS summary scores
80%
the MCS scores showed
improvement only at
6months
Concomitant operations had a
statistically signicant
negative impact on the
physical components of
SF-36 (PF, RP).
J. K. Tun et al.
When studying PCS, a positive
impact of smoking and a
negative impact of concomitant
operation and blood loss were
found. In case of MCS, only
the length of hospital stay had
a statistically signicant
(p<0.03) negative effect on
the score, but its magnitude
was not substantial (−0.3
points change per day).
Preop
Cohort size,
Author (year
of
publication),
Study
Follow-up
period
HRQOL
assessment
Yes 6months SF-36 Patients operated
with TASC II D lesions
presenting with IC.
study
centre(s) Patient characteristics
50 Consecutive patients
Study intent/
associated study
To examine
HRQOL in
patients operated
period,
Study type
(2017) [15]
Mean age 62year, Male
46%
University
with laparoscopic
aortobi femoral
bypass (LABFB)
for athero-
sclerotic
obstruction in
2005–2011 Oslo
All patients were in
Rutherford’s category 3,
except two patients who
were in Rutherford’s
category 5.
Hospital,
Sweden
aortoiliac
segment.
Prospective
study
Type of
intervention
Device type,
Brand name (if
applicable)
Table 19.2 Studies including interventions on aorto-iliac steno-occlusive disease
Surgery Kazmi et al.

19 Health-Related Quality of Life Outcomes for Endovascular and Open Surgical Interventions…
Quality
score
5
Main ndings related to
HRQOL
EQ-5D: All global and
domain (utility score, VAS)
our ongoing
HRQOL
instrument(s) used,
method of delivery,
completion rate Key outcomes
scores showed improvement
at 1year after EVT
(p<0.001).
(pain, distance, speed,
multicentre
prospective study
indicate
acceptable safety
and efcacy of
aortoiliac EVT,
Not stated. Use of
climbing) scores showed
improvement at 1year after
EVT (p<0.001).
supporting the
recent
recommendation
that EVT can be a
multiple
imputations to
generate data for
patients lost to
rst-line
treatment for
aortoiliac disease.
follow-up
7
The WIQ PAD specic score,
walking distance score,
walking speed score and stair
climbing score each showed a
signicant increase from
baseline to 12months
(p<0.001).
12months was
2.1% (p<0.001).
The acute
procedural
success and
30-day clinical
success
outcomes were
both 95%. The
primary patency
system was
shown to be safe
Not stated The Astron stent
and effective in
WIQ: 89%
rate at 12months
was 89.8%.
the treatment of
patients with
atherosclerotic
disease. The
367
(continued)
observed MAE
rate met the
pre-specied
performance goal
of 15%. The stent
demonstrated a
high 12-month
primary patency
rate and showed
improvement in
quality of life
measures.
Preop
Cohort size,
Author (year
of
publication),
Study
Follow-up
period
HRQOL
assessment
Mean age of 73±9 No 1year WIQ, EQ-5D 1-year data from
study
centre(s) Patient characteristics
893 (1128
limbs)
Study intent/
associated study
1-year clinical
outcomes of
endovascular
period,
Study type
Yamauchi et
al. (2019)
[16]
83% male Not stated WIQ: All global and domain
Rutherford category:
2/3/4=42%/51%/7%
in Japan
therapy (EVT)
for de novo
aortoiliac lesions
in patients with
symptomatic
2014–2019 64 centres
Prospective
observa-
Chronic total occlusion
(per limb)=36%
Femoropopliteal lesion
(per limb)=37%
PAD (Rutherford
classication 2, 3
or 4).
tional study
Yes 12months WIQ The MAE rate at
evaluable patients was
63.6years with the
majority being male
(65.2%). Patient risk
factors included
hyperlipidemia (77.6%),
161 The mean age of the
To evaluate the
safety and
efcacy of a
self-expanding
bare-metal nitinol
stent (Astron) for
the treatment of
(2016) [17]
external iliac
arteries.
Common iliac 67%,
2011–2014 30 centres
hypertension (72.7%)
and patients that were
current smokers (48.4%).
athero sclerotic
lesions in the
common and
external iliac 33%
TASC II A/B =
62%/35%
De novo 91.3%,
moderate/severe
(USA,
Canada,
Austria)
Prospective
study
calcication 70.8%
Type of
intervention
Device type,
Brand name (if
applicable)
Endovascular
(balloon-
expandable
stent,
self-expand-
able stent,
PTA)
Stent Burket et al.
Self-
expandable,
bare nitinol
stent
Astron

368
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Quality
score
9
Main ndings related to
HRQOL
WIQ: signicant
improvement from baseline
signicantly
HRQOL
instrument(s) used,
method of delivery,
completion rate Key outcomes
in all three dimensions
(walking distance, walking
speed, and stair climbing).
SF-36: Signicant
improvement from baseline
for health dimensions of
improved from
0.64±0.15 to
0.89±0.19
(p<0.01).
Mean initial
claudication
duration
Self-administered
(optional help
from research
physical functioning, role
physical, bodily pain and
vitality; also, physical
component scale
improved (1.7 ±
1.0 to 4.7 ± 3.3
months) and
mean MWD on
treadmill test
improved (3.3 ±
1.8 to 8.7 ± 4.4
months).
assistant)
80%
J. K. Tun et al.
No 30-day
mortality.
Complication rate
9% (n=3).
High technical
success (97%).
Preop
Cohort size,
Author (year
of
publication),
Study
Follow-up
period
HRQOL
assessment
Yes 12months SF-36, WIQ Mean ABI
Mean age 61.1 (SD 9.5),
Male 71%, HTN 54%,
DM 14%
study
centre(s) Patient characteristics
35 (46
limbs)
Study intent/
associated study
To determine the
effect of
aortoiliac stent
placement on
period,
Study type
al. (2005)
[18]
Stenosis n=30, chronic
arterial occlusions n=16
Island
Hospital,
Rhode
walking ability
and health-
related quality of
life (QOL) for
aortoiliac
insufciency in
1996–1999 Rhode
Island, USA
elderly
individuals with
moderate to
severe
Prospective
study
intermittent
claudication.
Type of
intervention
Device type,
Brand name (if
applicable)
Table 19.2 (continued)
Stent Murphy et
Self-
expandable,
bare alloy
stent/
self-
expandable,
polyester
covered alloy
stent/
balloon-
expandable
bare
stainless-steel
stent
Wallstent/
Wallgraft/
Palmaz

19 Health-Related Quality of Life Outcomes for Endovascular and Open Surgical Interventions…
Quality
score
7
Main ndings related to
HRQOL
The proportion of patients
with cumulative improvement
from baseline of at least one
Rutherford category at the
9-month visit was 90.5%
(124 of 137; 95% CI:
HRQOL
instrument(s) used,
method of delivery,
completion rate Key outcomes
composite
endpoint rate
was 16.2%
(93.5%
condence
84.3–94.9%).
interval [CI]:
10.6–23.2%),
primary patency
was 89.1% (95%
CI: 82.6–93.7%),
and freedom
score from baseline
32.1±26.84. Improvements
noted in all domains.
from TLR was
96%.
Not stated WIQ: mean change in total
LIFESTREAM
balloon-
expandable
covered stent
provided
satisfactory
9-month clinical
outcomes
including a low
rate of target
lesion
revascularization
for the treatment
of stenotic and
88% The
369
(continued)
occlusive lesions
of the iliac
arteries.
Preop
Cohort size,
Author (year
of
publication),
Study
Follow-up
period
HRQOL
assessment
Yes 9months WIQ The primary
symptoms of
lifestyle-limiting
study
centre(s) Patient characteristics
155 Eligible patients had
Study intent/
associated study
To assess the
performance of
the
period,
Study type
(2019) [19]
claudication or ischemic
rest pain (Rutherford
categories 2–4) and de
novo or re-stenotic,
non-stented lesions (!
50% of the reference
vessel diameter) in the
iliac artery.
LIFESTREAM
balloon-
expandable
covered stent for
the treatment of
iliac artery
atherosclerotic
lesions.
Mean age 64 years, Male
69%, HTN 76%, DM
32%
(Europe,
USA, NZ)
2014–2015 17 centres
Common iliac 73%,
external iliac 27%
study
TASC A/B/C and
D=62%/27%/11%
Rutherford 2/3/4 =
16%/76%/8%
Type of
intervention
Device type,
Brand name (if
applicable)
Stent Laird et al.
Balloon-
expandable,
ePTFE covered
stainless-steel
stent
LIFESTREAM Prospective

370
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Quality
score
9
Main ndings related to
HRQOL
When the two treatments
were compared, no signicant
Health-related
quality of life
HRQOL
instrument(s) used,
method of delivery,
completion rate Key outcomes
EQ-5D
difference was observed
(p<0.05). All measurements
showed a signicant
improves equally
after primary
stent placement
improvement in the quality of
life after treatment (p<0.05).
In both groups, scores of all
RAND-36 dimensions showed
signicant improvement after
revascularization. The scores
were still signicantly higher
than before treatment, with the
exception of the dimension of
and primary
angioplasty with
selective stent
placement in the
treatment of
intermittent
claudication
caused by iliac
artery occlusive
Telephone
interview
general health perception in
stent group (p=0.20) and
PTA group (p=0.09).
disease.
highest for physical
functioning, physical role
functioning, and bodily pain.
Scores on all RAND-36
dimensions were not
signicantly different
36% The effect of treatment was
between the groups.
All valuational quality-of-life
measures (time trade-off,
standard gamble, rating scale,
J. K. Tun et al.
health utilities index, EQ-5D)
demonstrated a signicant
improvement after treatment,
with the exception of the
standard gamble.
The values were not
signicantly different
between the groups.
Preop
Cohort size,
Author (year
of
publication),
Study
Follow-up
period
HRQOL
assessment
Yes 24 months RAND-36,
intermittent claudication
or critical ischemia
study
centre(s) Patient characteristics
279 All patients with
Study intent/
associated study
To assess the
quality of life in
patients with
period,
Study type
Bosch et al.
(1999) [20]
Stent (n=143): Mean
age 59, Male 71%;
in
compared
primary stent
placement versus
1993–1996 Six centres
common iliac 70%,
Netherlands
primary
caused by stenosis or
occlusion in the iliac
arteries.
iliac artery
occlusive
disease, we
external iliac 30%; 80%
>50% stenosis
angioplasty
followed by
selective stent
placement in a
multicentre
randomized
controlled trial.
PTA (n=136): Mean
age 60, Male 73%;
common iliac 67%,
external iliac 33%; 82%
>50% stenosis
Randomised
control trial
The treatment groups
demonstrated no
signicant differences
with respect to
descriptive variables,
baseline quality-of-life
measures, and baseline
clinical measures.
Type of
intervention
Device type,
Brand name (if
applicable)
Stent versus
Table 19.2 (continued)
Angioplasty
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
