Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5224_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Contents
- •Outcome Evaluation
- •Introduction
- •Clinical Presentation of Muscular Weakness in the Critical Patients
- •Critical Illness Polyneuropathy (CIP) and Critical Illness Myopathy (CIM)
- •Ventilator-Induced Diaphragmatic Dysfunction (VIDD)
- •Dysphagia, Swallowing, and Effective Cough
- •The Pathophysiology of Acute Skeletal Muscle Wasting
- •Risk Factors
- •Short-Term and Long-Term Outcome
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Introduction
- •The Neuroendocrine Response
- •Pathophysiology of Stress Response
- •The Hypothalamus-Pituitary-Adrenal (HPA) Axis
- •GH Axis
- •Pituitary-Thyroid Axis
- •Pituitary-Adrenal Axis
- •Mitochondrial Dysfunction
- •Metabolic Aspects of Stress Response
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Disorders of Fluid Balance
- •Dysionemias
- •Dysnatremias
- •Dyskalemias
- •Other Electrolyte Derangements (Calcium, Magnesium, Phosphorus)
- •Alterations of Acid Base Balance
- •Acid-Base Disturbances
- •Metabolic Acidosis
- •Respiratory Acidosis
- •Metabolic Alkalosis
- •Respiratory Alkalosis
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Epidemiology and Risk Factors
- •Diagnosis
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Treatment
- •Prognosis
- •Future Perspectives
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Gut Microbiome
- •Gut-Organ Axis
- •Gut-Lung Axis
- •ICU Dysbiosis
- •Gut Changes
- •Microbial Therapy in ICU
- •Antimicrobial Stewardship
- •Nutrition as a Key Factor for Gut Microbiome Homeostasis
- •Probiotics, Prebiotics, and Synbiotics
- •Fecal Microbiota Transplantation
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Validation Process
- •Screening Tools Overview
- •Discussion
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Fight-and-Flight Reaction
- •Calorimetry and Total Energy Expenditure
- •Role of Mitochondria in the Various Stages of Intensive Care Recovery
- •REE in Different Clinical Scenarios
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Nutrition in ICU: Evidence from RCTs
- •Inclusion of Too Many Patients Considered at Low Nutritional Risk
- •Unfavorable Energy to Protein Doses
- •Absence of Indirect Calorimetry-Guided Energy Dosing
- •Anabolic Resistance
- •Suppression of Fasting-Induced Recovery Pathways
- •Future Perspectives
- •Development and Validation of Tools to Guide Individualized Nutritional Support
- •Implications for Clinical Practice
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Protein Metabolism in Critical Illness
- •Protein Requirements and Current Evidence
- •Timing of Introduction
- •Early mobilization, Exercise, and Adjuvant Therapies
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Computed Tomography Scan
- •Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis
- •Musculoskeletal Ultrasound
- •Respiratory Muscle Ultrasound
- •Limb Muscles
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Functional Principles
- •Hydration Status Evaluations in Critically Ill Patients
- •Body Composition and Nutrition in ICU
- •Limits of BIVA in Critically Ill Patients
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Introduction
- •Historical Perspective
- •Enteral Versus Parenteral Nutrition Nowadays
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Enteral Nutrition
- •Components of Enteral Mixtures
- •Choice of the Enteral Mixture
- •Special Composition Formulas
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Complications Related to Enteral Feeding Tubes
- •Aspiration
- •Gastrointestinal Intolerance
- •Diarrhea
- •New Horizons
- •New Technologies to Prevent Enteral Nutrition Complications
- •Advanced Tube Feedings
- •smART Platform
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Composition of PN Admixtures
- •Energetic Substrates
- •Carbohydrates
- •Lipid Emulsions
- •Proteins
- •Micronutrients: Electrolytes, Vitamins, and Trace Elements
- •Types of Parenteral Nutrition
- •Compatibility and Stability of the Parenteral Nutrition
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Metabolic Complications
- •Hyperglycemia
- •Hypertriglyceridemia
- •Liver Disease: Steatosis, Cholestatic Disease, and Gallbladder Stones
- •Refeeding Syndrome
- •Mechanical Complications
- •Infectious Complications
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Macronutrients
- •Glutamine
- •Arginine
- •Leucine
- •ω-3 Fatty Acids
- •Micronutrients
- •Antioxidant Vitamins
- •Antioxidant Trace Elements
- •Probiotics, Prebiotics or Symbiotics
- •Use of Probiotics in Clinical Practice?
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Pathophysiological Mechanisms, Risk Factors, and Clinical Implications
- •Pathophysiological Mechanisms of ICUAW
- •Risk Factors Associated with Physical and Functional Recovery in Critically Ill Patients
- •Clinical Impact of Poor Physical and Functional Recovery in Critical Illnesses
- •How to Assess Physical and Functional Recovery in Critical Illnesses
- •Management and Therapies
- •Nutritional Therapy
- •Other Supportive Therapies
- •Patient- and Family-centered ICU Environment
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Bioethics in Clinical Practices
- •Ethical Consideration on Nutrition
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Nutrition in ARDS
- •Caloric Goals
- •Diet Composition
- •Immunonutrition
- •Oral Versus Enteral Versus Parenteral Nutrition
- •Nutrition in COVID-19 Respiratory Failure
- •Nutrition in ECMO Support
- •Enteral Nutrition
- •Parenteral Nutrition
- •Nutritional Goals
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Timing and Route of Nutritional Support
- •Initial Assessment of the Burn Patient
- •Estimation of Energy Expenditure
- •Macronutrients and Micronutrients
- •Proteins
- •Carbohydrates
- •Immunonutrients
- •Arginine
- •Nucleotides
- •ω3 Fatty Acids
- •Glutamine
- •Monitoring of Nutritional Support
- •Nutritional Support for Trauma Patients
- •Route of Feeding: Digestive Tract (Enteral Nutrition) Versus Intravenous (Parenteral Nutrition)
- •Standard or Immune-Enhancing Enteral Nutrition
- •Estimation or Measurement of Energy Requirements
- •Macronutrients
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Introduction
- •General Considerations
- •Assessment of Nutritional Needs
- •Metabolic Changes Induced by Sepsis, AKI, and CRRT
- •Protein Metabolism
- •Lipid Metabolism
- •Vitamins and Trace Elements
- •Phosphates
- •Approaches to Nutrition
- •Enteral
- •Parenteral
- •Timing
- •Recommendations
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Acute Liver Failure
- •Nutrition in ALF
- •Acute Pancreatitis
- •IAP Management
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Nutritional Considerations in Major Surgery
- •Nutritional Requirements During and After Major Surgery
- •Challenges in Meeting Nutritional Needs Post-Surgery
- •Strategies for Enhancing Nutritional Intake and Absorption
- •Intestinal Failure: Nutritional Challenges and Management
- •Impact of Intestinal Failure on Nutritional Status
- •Nutritional Management Strategies for Patients with Intestinal Failure
- •Role of Parenteral Nutrition and Enteral Nutrition in Intestinal Failure Cases
- •Open Abdomen: Nutritional Support and Wound Healing
- •Nutritional Requirements for Patients with Open Abdomen Wounds
- •Challenges in Providing Nutritional Support to Patients with Open Abdomen
- •Clinical Protocols and Guidelines for Nutritional Support
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Nutrition Therapy
- •Determination of Energy Expenditure
- •Route and Timing of Enteral Nutrition
- •Intolerance to Enteral Nutrition
- •Brain Energy Metabolism and Energy Dysfunction Following Acute Brain Injury
- •In Vivo Brain Energy and Glucose Monitoring
- •Alternative Energy Substrates
- •Lactate
- •Ketone Bodies
- •Immunonutrition and Micronutrients
- •Conclusions and Future Directions
- •References
- •Introduction
- •AKI and Cardiac Surgery
- •AKI and Vascular Surgery
- •AKI and Sepsis
- •AKI and Surgery
- •Trauma
- •Burn
- •AKI and COVID-19
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •AKI Etiology
- •Subclinical AKI and AKI Biomarkers
- •Subphenotyping AKI
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Introduction
- •What Are Biomarkers?
- •Novel Biomarkers: How Can They be Implemented?
- •Biomarkers for the Prediction of AKI and Detection of Subclinical Stages
- •Postoperative Biomarker-Guided Prevention of AKI in Patients at High Risk
- •Biomarkers for Other Indications
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •The Machine Learning Arena
- •The Challenges of Timely Prediction of Acute Kidney Injury
- •Early Machine Learning Models for AKI Prediction
- •New Techniques for AKI Prediction Using Deep Learning ML Models
- •Clinical Decision Support Systems
- •The Translational Research Gap and the Value of Data Sharing: A Plea for Data Sharing
- •Limitations of Machine Learning Models
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Doppler Assesses Vascular Congestion
- •Arterial Renal Doppler Ultrasound in AKI
- •Integration of Renal Resistive Index and Intrarenal Venous Flow
- •Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Assessing Renal Perfusion
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Renal Perfusion and Goals of Fluids in AKI
- •Clinical Evaluation of a Patient with AKI in ICU
- •Studies Which Investigated the Association of Fluid Therapy and AKI
- •Volume of Fluid
- •Type of Fluid
- •Crystalloids
- •Colloids
- •Starches
- •Gelatins
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Pathophysiology of Renal Perfusion
- •Acute Kidney Injury
- •Norepinephrine
- •Epinephrine
- •Dopamine
- •Vasopressin
- •Terlipressin
- •Angiotensin II
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Pharmacology of Diuretics
- •Loop Diuretics
- •Other Classes of Diuretics
- •Indications for Diuretics in AKI
- •Control of Fluid Overload
- •AKI Prognostication
- •Situations in Which Diuretics Are Not Indicated
- •AKI Recovery
- •How to Use Diuretics in the ICU
- •Class and Dose Selection
- •Modality of Loop Diuretic Administration
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Introduction
- •What Is Acute Kidney Disease?
- •Clinical Course of AKD Within the ICU
- •Management of AKD in Critical Care and Beyond
- •Conclusions and Future Directions
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Renal Functional Reserve
- •Renal Functional Reserve and Renal Recovery After Acute Kidney Injury
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Background
- •Membrane and Filter Characteristics
- •Geometric Characteristics
- •Performance Characteristics
- •Mechanisms of Fluid and Solute Transport
- •Treatment Modalities
- •Treatment Dose
- •Nomenclature of Renal Replacement Therapies
- •Continuous Therapies
- •Intermittent Therapies
- •Hybrid Therapies
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Dialysis Catheters: Technical Aspects
- •Selection of the Site for Dialysis
- •Catheter Insertion Technique
- •Dialysis Catheter Complications
- •Dialysis Catheter Maintenance
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Non-pharmacological Strategies to Reduce Membrane Fouling
- •Pharmacological Strategies to Reduce Membrane Clotting
- •Unfractionated Heparin (UFH) Systemic Anticoagulation
- •Systemic Anticoagulation with Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH)
- •Regional Citrate Anticoagulation (RCA)
- •Systemic Anticoagulation with Direct Thrombin Antagonists
- •Nafamostat
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Introduction
- •CRRT Dose/Outcome Studies: Consideration of Solute Kinetics
- •CRRT Dose as a Quality Criterion
- •CRRT Dose in the Context of Therapy Quality
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Patient Selection and Indications for Starting RRT
- •Strategies to Identify Need for RRT
- •Rationale for an Early Strategy to Starting RRT
- •Rationale for a Conservative Strategy to Starting RRT
- •RRT Replacement Therapy and Clinical Outcomes
- •Current Clinical Practice Guideline Recommendations
- •Clinical Trial Evidence on Timing of Starting RRT
- •Implications for Practice
- •Existing Knowledge Gaps and Future Research
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Early ICU Phase before KRT
- •Nutrition Care
- •Monitoring
- •ICU Phase with KRT
- •Gains and Losses During CRRT
- •Electrolyte Loss in CRRT
- •Macronutrient Loss in CRRT
- •Macronutrient Gain in CRRT
- •Micronutrients and Vitamin Loss in CRRT
- •Management of Losses During CRRT
- •Monitoring During CRRT
- •Indirect Calorimetry During CRRT
- •ICU Phase After CRRT
- •EN and PN Product Selection
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Nomenclature
- •Continuous Therapies
- •Intermittent Renal Replacement Therapies (IRRTs)
- •Hybrid Therapies
- •Technical Aspects of RRT Techniques
- •Hemodynamic Stability
- •Solute Clearance
- •Fluid Balance
- •Vascular Access
- •Anticoagulation
- •Drug Dosing
- •Patient Mobilization
- •The Process of RRT Prescription and Administration
- •Indications of RRT
- •Timing
- •Prescription Parameters
- •Dosing
- •Membrane Choice
- •Dialysate and Reinfusion Solutions
- •Limitations of RRT in Critical Care
- •Patient Safety During RRT in Critical Care
- •Introduction
- •Steps in RRT Management and Protocol Application

30 Ultrasound in Acute Kidney Injury 357
The microbubbles used for contrast-enhanced ultrasound are sensitive to
insonation and consequently can easily be depleted by overscanning. The firstgeneration ultrasound contrast agents contained microbubbles of air and were
characterized by a very short life [
half-life and the ability to cross the pulmonary circulation have led to the development of second-generation contrast agents. They include microbubbles of perfluorocarbon, nitrogen gas, or sulfur hexafluoride stabilized in a phospholipid
membrane. The bubbles oscillate when exposed to the ultrasound beam [30].
To evaluate the perfusion, the ultrasound contrast is infused continuously at low
velocity, while intermittent imaging with destructive frames at increasing imaging
frame rates is recorded. This allows to build a curve representing replenishment
kinetics from a series of clips at different frame rates. Fitting of this curve enables
derivation of two relative parameters representing perfusion in the tissue: the
regional blood volume (plateau value) and blood velocity (initial slope of the
replenishment curve). The local blood flow, F, is thus the product of microbubble
velocity by regional blood volume—F = A × β—where A corresponds to the plateau
signal intensity and β is the initial slope of the replenishment curve [31]. Other
approaches for estimating the blood flow, derived by the extension of the previous
application, are developed; this has led to the development and availability of
different analysis software. During the acquisition of a destruction refilling
sequence, several images are collected. Each panel of acquisition is divided
in two: one side shows contrast-specific image, while the other side is standard
B-mode image. In a healthy and well-perfused kidney after the destruction flash, no
signal is detectable in the contrast-specific image. After 5 s, partial replenishment of
the main arteries with contrast can be n oticed. At 10 s, the kidney is fully replenished
with contrast. During the acquisition of these different images in the contrast-specific
box, there are any significant changes observ able in B-mode images [32, 33].
Although the capability of CEUS to assess microvascular perfusion and renal
blood flow is well defined [32] and has been proposed for predicting renal outcomes
in patients with acute kidney injury [34], its usefulness at bedside in the intensive
care unit is still unclear, it is affected by a variability of measure up, and it is not
correlated with pati ents ’ characteristics [28, 35]. More studies should be performed
in critical patients to determine whether CEUS parameters predict or facilitate the
early diagnosis of acute kidney injury and whether they can help assess the impact of
therapeutic interventions in real time [33].
29]. The need for microbubbles with a longer
Conclusions
Ultimately, the interpretation of RRI may be highly dependent on the clinical
context, and patient selection for studies investigating the significance of the RRI
should be considered carefully. Doppler-based RRI and IRVF may enable to individualize diagnostic tools in AKI and moni tor its evolution, but an integrated

358 G. Romero-González et al.
approach with other echographic techniques and biomarkers should be preferred.
Furthermore, more studies are needed to confirm preliminary reports.
Nowadays, CEUS failed to demonstrate its usefulness [36] although additional
studies are needed, even if assessing performance of the technique (e.g., machine
setting, homogenization of infusion modalities
of contrast media, use of 3D
probes) [36].
References
1. Moses AA, Fernandez HE. Ultrasonography in acute kidney injury. POCUS J. 2022;7:35–44.
2. Romero-González G, Manrique J, Slon-Roblero MF, Husain-Syed F, De la Espriella R,
Ferrari F, et al. PoCUS in nephrology: a new tool to improve our diagnostic skills. Clin
J. 2023;16(2):218–29.
3. Firth JDRALJ.
Lancet. 1981;1:1033–5.
4. Mullens W, Abrahams Z, Francis GS, Sokos G, Taylor DO, Starling RC, et al. Importance of
venous congestion for worsening of renal function in advanced decompensated heart failure. J
Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:589–96.
5. Beaubien-Souligny W, Denault A, Robillard P, Desjardins G. The role of point-of-care ultrasound monitoring in cardiac surgical patients with acute kidney injury. J Cardiothorac Vasc
Anesth. 2019;33(10):2781–96.
6. Argaiz ER. VExUS nexus: bedside assessment of venous congestion. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis.
2021;28(3):252–61.
7. Husain-Syed F, Gröne H, Assmus B, Bauer P, Gall H, Seeger W, et al. Congestive nephropathy:
a neglected entity? Proposal for diagnostic criteria and future perspectives. ESC Heart Fail.
2021;8(1):183–203.
8. Boorsma EM, ter Maaten JM, Voors AA, van Veldhuisen DJ. Renal compression in heart
failure. JACC Heart Fail. 2022;10(3):175–83.
9. Hanberg JS, Sury K, Wilson FP, Brisco MA, Ahmad T, ter Maaten JM, et al. Reduced cardiac
index is not the dominant driver of renal dysfunction in heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol.
2016;67(19):2199–208.
10. Beaubien-Souligny W, Rola P, Haycock K, Bouchard J, Lamarche Y, Spiegel R, et al. Quantifying systemic congestion with point-of-care ultrasound: development of the venous excess
ultrasound grading system. Ultrasound J. 2020;12(1):16.
11. Husain-Syed F, Birk H, Ronco C, Schörmann T, Tello K, Richter MJ, et al. Doppler-derived
renal venous stasis index in the prognosis of right heart failure. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8(21):
e013584.
12. Meola M, Nalesso F, Petrucci I, Samoni S, Ronco C. Ultrasound in acute kidney disease.
Contrib Nephrol. 2016;188:11–20.
13. Rozemeijer S, Haitsma Mulier JLG, Röttgering JG, Elbers PWG, Spoelstra-de Man AME,
Tuinman PR, et al. Renal resistive index: response to shock and its determinants in critically ill
patients. Shock. 2019;52(1):43–51.
14. Meola M, Samoni S, Petrucci I, Ronco C. Clinical scenarios in acute kidney injury-parenchymal
acute kidney injury – vascular diseases. Contrib Nephrol. 2016;188:48–63.
15. Bossard G, Bourgoin P, Corbeau JJ, Huntzinger J, Beydon L. Early detection of postoperative
acute kidney injury by Doppler renal resistive index in cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary
bypass. Br J Anaesth. 2011;107(6):891–8.
16. Schnell D,
better predicts the occurrence of acute kidney injury than cystatin C. Shock. 2012;38(6):592–7.
Raised venous pressure: a direct cause of renal sodium retention in oedema?
Deruddre S, Harrois A, Pottecher J, Cosson C, Adoui N, et al. Renal resistive index
Kidney

30 Ultrasound in Acute Kidney Injury 359
17. Guinot PG, Bernard E, Abou Arab O, Badoux L, Diouf M, Zogheib E, et al. Doppler-based
renal resistive index can assess progression of acute kidney injury in patients undergoing
cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2013;27(5):890–6.
18. Platt JF, Rubin JM, Ellis JH. Acute renal failure: possible role of duplex Doppler US
distinction between acute prerenal failure and acute tubular necrosis. Radiology. 1991;179(2):
419–23.
19. Bianchi Bosisio NSM, Romero-González G, De Silvestri A, Husain-Syad F, Ferrari F. Dopplerbased evaluation of intrarenal venous flow as a new tool to predict acute kidney injury: a
systematic review and meta-analysis. Nefrologia. 2023;43:57.
20. Langlois SLP. Focused ultrasound training for clinicians. Crit Care Med. 2007;35(Suppl):
S138–43.
21. Herrler T, Tischer A, Meyer A, Feiler S, Guba M, Nowak S, et al. The intrinsic renal
compartment syndrome: new perspectives in kidney transplantation. Transplantation. 2010;89
(1):40–6.
22. Deruddre S, Cheisson G, Mazoit JX, Vicaut E, Benhamou D, Duranteau J. Renal arterial
resistance in septic shock: effects of increasing mean arterial pressure with norepinephrine on
the renal resistive index assessed with Doppler ultrasonography. Intensive Care Med. 2007;33
(9):1557–62.
23. Beaubien-Souligny W, Huard G, Bouchard J, Lamarche Y, Denault A, Albert M. Doppler renal
resistance index for the prediction of response to passive leg-raising following cardiac surgery. J
Clin Ultrasound. 2018;46(7):455–60.
24. Olson MC, Abel EJ, Mankowski Gettle L. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in renal imaging and
intervention. Curr Urol Rep. 2019;20(11):73.
25. Kazmierski B, Deurdulian C, Tchelepi H, Grant EG. Applications of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the kidney. Abdom Radiol. 2018;43(4):880–98.
26. Bertolotto M, Bucci S, Valentino M, Currò F, Sachs C, Cova MA. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for characterizing renal masses. Eur J Radiol. 2018;105:41–8.
27. Kazmierski BJ, Sharbidre KG, Robbin ML, Grant EG. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the
evaluation of renal transplants. J Ultrasound Med. 2020;39(12):2457–68.
28. Darmon M, Schnell D, Schneider A. Monitoring of renal perfusion. Intensive Care Med.
2022;48:1505–7.
29. Esposito F, Di Serafino M, Sgambati P, Mercogliano F, Tarantino L, Vallone G, et al.
Ultrasound contrast media in paediatric patients: is it an off-label use? Regulatory requirements
and radiologist’s liability. Radiol Med. 2012;117(1):148–59.
30. Wilson SR, Greenbaum LD, Goldberg BB. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound: what is the evidence
and what are the obstacles? Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193(1):55–60.
31. Wei K, Le E, Bin JP, Coggins M, Thorpe J, Kaul S. Quantification of renal blood flow with
contrast-enhanced ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37(4):1135–40.
32. Schneider AG, Hofmann L, Wuerzner G, Glatz N, Maillard M, Meuwly JY, et al. Renal
perfusion evaluation with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. Nephrol Dial Transplant.
2012;27(2):674–81.
33. Schneider A, Johnson L, Goodwin M, Schelleman A, Bellomo R. Bench-to-bedside review:
contrast enhanced ultrasonography – a promising technique to assess renal perfusion in the ICU.
Crit Care. 2011;15(3):1–8.
34. Yoon HE, Kim DW, Kim D, Kim Y, Shin SJ, Shin YR. A pilot trial to evaluate the clinical
usefulness of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in predicting renal outcomes in patients with acute
kidney injury. PLoS One. 2020;15(6):e0235130.
35. Schneider AG,
enhanced ultrasonography to evaluate changes in renal cortical microcirculation induced by
noradrenaline: a pilot study. Crit Care. 2014;18(6):1–9.
36.
Darmon M,
2022;48(10):1505–7.
Goodwin
Schnell D, Schneider A. Monitoring of renal perfusion. Intensive Care Med.
MD, Schelleman A, Bailey M, Johnson L, Bellomo R. Contrast-
in

Chapter 31
Management of AKI: Fluids
Gianluca Castellani, Marta Calatroni, and Antonio Messina
Introduction
Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a significant disorder that worsens the outcome of
critically ill patients, leading to increased morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs
[1, 2]. The incidence of hospital-acquired AKI in intensive care unit (ICU) has
increased over the past decades, affecting more than 50% of patients, primarily
among older individuals in the context of multiorgan failure [1, 2]. Risk factors for
AKI include conditions like volume depletion, sepsis, preexisting chronic kidney
disease (CKD), heart, liver, and gastrointestinal diseases, anemia, major surgery, and
use of nephrotoxic drugs [3]. In up to 75% of cases, AKI results from reduced renal
perfusion associated with hypovolemia or impaired cardiac output (pre-renal AKI)
[4]. Ensuring sufficient renal perfusion by preventing fluid deficit has conventionally
been one of the cornerstones of prevention and treatment of AKI [5]. Nevertheless,
Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-66541-7_31.
G. Castellani
Department
Milan, Italy
e-mail: gianluca.castellani@humanitas.it
M. Calatroni
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
Nephrology and Dialysis Division, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
e-mail: marta.calatroni@hunimed.eu
A. Messina (
Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital,
Milan, Italy
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
© T
A. Cotoia et al. (eds.), Nutrition, Metabolism and Kidney Support,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-66541-7_31
of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital,
✉)
he Author(s), u
nder exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2024
361

362 G. Castellani et al.
some types of AKI are volume unresponsive, and the clinical benefit of this approach
is being challenged by increasing evidence that AKI patients are especially susceptible to developing volume overload compared to non-AKI patients with worsening
organ dysfunction [6–9]. In addition, fluid overload raises venous pressure, leading
to renal venous congestion and renal interstitial edema which may decelerate AKI
recovery [10].
these
Given
remains one of the most disputed aspects of treating AKI patients. It depends on the
underlying cause of AKI, the patient’s volume status, the type of fluid employed, and
the timing, infusion rates, and volumes used [11].
In this chapter, we provide an overview of fluid management in critically ill
patients with AKI. This approach should strike a balance between the need for
adequate fluid resuscitation and the avoidance of volume overload with organ
edema.
considerat
ions,
the risk–benefit assessment of fluid administration
Renal Perfusion and Goals of Fluids in AKI
AKI can result from reduced kidney perfusion. Renal blood flow (RBF) is determined by the pressure gradient between inflow and outflow pressures in the kidneys
(ΔP), as well as vascular resistance (R), RBF = [ΔP/R]. The inflow pressure
depends on mean arterial pressure (MAP), while the outflow pressure is influenced
by the renal venous pressure. Hypotension decreases RBF by reducing inflow
pressure. Conversely, an increase in outflow pressure, often seen in systemic venous
congestion due conditions like right heart failure, cirrhosis, or compartment syndrome, can lead to interstitial edema and increased resistance to RBF. Resistance is
chiefly determined by the afferent and efferent arterioles. Vasoconstriction of both
arterioles reduces RBF, while efferent arteriolar vasoconstriction increases the
glomerular capillary pressure and filtration fraction [
ible, persistent renal ischemia leads to an acute tubular necrosis (ATN) with tubular
epithelial injury, cell death, and delayed renal recovery, necessitating tissue regeneration [13, 14]. Furthermore, multiple inflammatory mechanisms contribute to
AKI’s pathogenesis, involving direct cellular injury, inflammation-induced damage,
and microcirculatory system alterations [ 15].Given the interplay of local and
systemic inflammation, changes in intrarenal blood flow, and microcirculatory
dysfunction, improving calculated renal oxygen delivery through systemic circulation alone may not easily reverse these processes. In this setting, the main physiological rationale for administration of fluids in critically ill patients with AKI is to
increase stroke volume (SV) and, consequently, cardiac output (CO) to optimize
systemic blood flow and tissue perfusion, to reverse renal ischemia, and to avert the
onset of ATN [
diuresis, dilute tubular toxins, and attenuate tubular obstruction in the renal tubules
and correct electrolyte alterations and acid-base disorders. In clinical practice, no
single clinical or laboratory marker can be used to quantify renal perfusion.
16, 17]
(Fig. 31.1). Other goals for fluid prescription are to promote
Although initially revers-
12].

31 Management of AKI: Fluids 363
Fluid therapy
Restore systemic blood pressure, CO and renal perfusion
Reduction of the neuroendocrine reflexes responsible for
increasing renal vascular resistance
Total RBF
Pressure gradient between the glomerular capillary and Bowman’s
space
GFR
of AKI
Fig. 31.1 Main goals of fluid administration in AKI patients. CO cardiac output, RBF renal blood
flow, GFR glomerular filtration rate, AKI acute kidney injury
Therefore, a multimodal assessment is recommended [18]. In patients with AKI, the
reduction of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) due to reduced CO, systemic hypotension, and triggered neuroendocrine reflexes causes an activation of the reninangiotensin system (RAS) with consequences increased in salt and water retention,
reduction of urine output with oliguria, and risk of volume overload.

364 G. Castellani et
al.
Signs of hypoperfusion
Hemodynamic Instability
Clinical trigger
Bedside Hemodynamic
Evaluation
CCE
CRT
Lactate
Skin mottling
ΔPCO
2
ScVO
2
Is the patient
fluid responsive?
Bedside hemodynamic evaluation
Heart dysfunction
No heart dysfunction
FC infusion
Reassessment
• CCE
• Signs of
hypoperfusion
Can an increase CO to
improve hypoperfusion?
Clinical quesion
Consider Advanced
Hemodynamic Monitoring
No Improvement
Improvement but no resolution
Improvement and resolution
STOP FLUIDS
Fig. 31.2 Decision-making process at the bedside to guide and titrate fluid administration during
an episode of acute circulatory failure in critically ill patients. CCE critical care echocardiography,
CO cardiac output, CRT capillary refill time, FC fluid challenge, ΔPCO
venous-to-arterial CO
2
tension difference, ScVO2central venous oxygen saturation
Clinical Evaluation of a Patient with AKI in ICU
AKI has many underlying causes, including intrinsic and obstructive (the “classical”
intrarenal and post-renal AKI), yet the most frequent causes of AKI are consequences of hemodynamically mediated reductions in the glomerular filtration rate
(the “classical” prerenal AKI). Restoring kidney perfusion rapidly reverses the latter
condition as the integrity of the kidneys remains intact. Severe or prolonged
hypoperfusion may ultimately result in tubular epithelial cell necrosis, which
might be irreversible. Treatment strategy in AKI has usually implied the administration of intravenous fluids to correct hypovolemia and/or restore kidney perfusion.
However, it should be recognized that many patients with hemodynamic AKI do not
respond to volume administration. In patients with cardiogenic or obstructive shock,
administration of fluids does not necessarily result in an increased cardiac output
(CO) with improved kidney perfusion. Moreover, even in distributive shock types,
this is often not the case as the CO reserve has already been exploited and alterations
to intra-glomerular hemodynamics play a dominant role. Finally, in patients with
established tubular injury, GFR will not improve with fluid administration, even if
the initial precipitating cause of AKI was true hypovolemia. Therefore, the approach
to the critical patient AKI should start with taking a comprehensive history to assess
for obvious causes of fluid loss (i.e., gastrointestinal), careful chart review, and
evaluation of fluid in- and outputs. The second step is the assessment of the
hemodynamic status; a possible evaluation is described in Fig.
31.2 [16].
step should include renal ultrasound or CT to rule out obstructive disease and urine
examination to evaluate the presence of proteinuria or dysmorphic hematuria to
The third
2

31 Management of AKI: Fluids 365
exclude glomerular causes of AKI [19]. Then, the fractional sodium excretion (FENa
+) is helpful to differentiate prerenal AKI (FENa+ <1%) from ATN, although low
FENa+ is not a reliable predictor of fluid responsiveness as hemodynamic AKI due
to vasodilatation or congestion is associated with a low urine sodium
concentration [20].
Studies Which Investigated the Association of Fluid Therapy and AKI
The aim of fluid administration in critically ill patients is to restore euvolemia and
guarantee perfusion of tissues, without causing fluid overload and harm to the
organs. Fluid therapy has been used for more than 200 years in sick patients. Until
recent years, the choice of fluid for resuscitation was related to different practice in
different geographical areas rather than evidence [21]. During the last decades, the
relationship between volume overload, AKI, and adverse outcomes has increased. In
several observational studies, a positive fluid balance seems to be associated with
increased risk of AKI, non-recovery of renal function, and an increase of mortality
[22–24].Also, fluid overload during renal replacement therapy (RRT) in ICU is
associated with increased risk of death and impaired recovery of renal function
[25]. In a retrospective analysis of a multice nter randomized clinical trial (RCT), a
negative fluid balance achieved during RRT has been significantly associated with
increased RRT-free days [26]. In another study, the Fluid and Catheter Treatment
Trial (FACTT), a positive fluid balance was strongly associated with mortality and
diuretic treatment associated with improved survival in patients who developed AKI
during the study [27]. According to this evidence, a careful identification of patients
that benefit from fluid administration is crucial. In recent years, different studies
investigated the relation between the type and volume of fluid administered and the
incidence of AKI. Br oadly speaking, the matter can be approached considering the
studies on volume of fluids and type (colloids or crystalloids).
Volume of Fluid
Fluid loading is indicated in cases of shock due to intravascular hypovolemia to
prevent organ failure, including AKI. However, an association between fluid
overload and AKI has been described in different studies [8, 23, 28, 29]. The
mechanisms may include intrarenal compartment syndrome and venous congestion
as a result of the kidneys being encapsulated organs [10]. Fluid administration may
also impair the renal oxygen supply-demand relationship as a result of an increase in
glomerular filtration rate and sodium reabsorption [30]. An association between
elevated central venous pressure, renal venous congestion, and development of

366 G. Castellani et al.
AKI, mainly reported in congestive heart failure, has also been found in other ICU
patient cohorts [31, 32 ]. A randomized controlled trial on fluid management in acute
respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients showed that restrictive fluid management does not cause more harm to the kidneys compared to a liberal one [33]. A
study in 2008 described the relationship between positive fluid balance and worse
outcomes in acute renal failure [23]. Myles et al. found a relationship between a
34]
restrictive fluid balance and a higher rate of acute kidney injury [
.
Type of Fluid
Crystalloids
All commercially available crystalloid solutions are artificial, with a composition
that differs from human plasma. Historically, intravenous 0.9% sodium chloride
solution has been the standard resuscitation fluid. There are concerns regarding
possible nephrotoxicity of normal saline, related to its high concentration of sodium
and chloride and acidity. A study in 1983 demonstrated the association between
chloride infusion and progressive renal vasoconstriction and a fall in GFR that is
independent of the renal nerves, is potentiated by prior salt depletion, and is related
to tubular Cl reabsorption [35]. Chloride-induced vasoconstriction appears specific
for the renal vessels. Another study in 2012 demonstra ted that intravenous infusion
of 0.9% saline results in reductions in renal blood flow velocity and renal cortical
tissue perfusion [36].
Therefore, trials were planned to assess the association between different crys-
talloid solutions and AKI (Table 31.1).
A trial in 2016 reported a higher risk of hyperkalemia in post-kidney transplant
patients who received 2 L of 0.9% saline versus Ringer’s lactate. This finding may
be since chloride-rich crystalloids contribute to the development of non-anion gap
metabolic acidosis and potential efflux of intracellular potassium [37].
The Split trial random ized patients to Plasma-Lyte 148 versus normal saline, and
there was no difference in patients with moderate to severe AKI; this analysis was a
feasibility trial that included patients with lower comorbid conditions, and the
average amount of fluids given was <2L[38].
The SALT
noncritically ill patients cared outside the ICU; while there was no difference in
hospital-free days between treatment with balanc ed crystalloids and treatment with
saline, a relation between major kidney events and normal saline therapy was
found [39].
In the SMART trial among critically ill adults, the use of balanced crystalloids for
intravenous fluid administration resulted in a lower rate of the composite outcom e of
death from any cause, new renal replacement therapy (RRT), or persistent renal
dysfunction than the use of saline [39].
-ED trial compared balanced crystalloids versus normal saline in

31 Management of AKI: Fluids 367
s. 12.9%)
RT
Australia and
New Zealand
Double random-
75 ICUs in Brazil 53 ICUs in
Single center USA,
Monocentric,
5 ICUs
USA
Double blind, fac-
Pragmatic, cluster ran-
Pragmatic, mul-
ized controlled
trial
torial, randomized
clinical trial
domized, multiple
crossover
tiple crossover
Critically ill adults
(50% elective
Critically ill adults Critically ill adults
Noncritically ill
adults
surgery)
Balanced crystalloids Plasma-Lyte Plasma-Lyte 148
90-day mortality
90-day mortality
MAKE within 30 days
crystalloids
Hospital-free
0.90)
(21.8% vs. 22%, p
vs. 27.2%,
(26.4%
p 0.47)
(14.3% vs. 15.4% p
0.04)
(25 vs.
25, p 0.41)
days
New R
AKI with RRT
Hospital mortality at
MAKE at
Maximum
(12.7% v
(0.88% vs. 0.93%)
30 days
(10.3% vs. 11.1%,
30 days
(4.7% vs. 5.6%,
increase of creati-
nine during ICU
p0.06); new RRT
(2.5% vs. 2.9%, p 0.08)
p 0,01)
stay
(0.41 vs. 0.41 mg/
dl)
O’Malley et al.
Table 31.1 Main trials on administration of crystalloids in ICU patients
[37] SPLIT [38] SALT-ED [39] SMART [39] BaSICS [40] PLUS [41]
Study
Setting Monocentric 4 ICUs in
New Zealand
Double blind,
cluster random-
ized, double
crossover
double blind
Design Randomized,
Number of patients 51 2278 13,347 15,802 11,052 5037
patients, mainly
Critically ill
plant patients
Population Kidney trans-
surgical
Intervention Ringer’s lactate Plasma-Lyte Balanced
Control Normal saline Normal saline Normal saline Normal saline Normal saline Normal saline
p 0.77)
AKI
(9.6% vs. 9.2%,
Creatinine on
pod
3 (no difference)
Primary outcome
(Intervention vs. control)
In hospital mor-
tality
(25.2 vs. 29,4%)
Number of
patients with
peak K+ > 6
Secondary outcome
(Intervention vs. control)
RRT
(0 vs. 5)
(2.5% vs. 2.9%)
unit, AKI acute kidney injury, RRT renal replacement therapy
ICU intensive care
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
