Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5538_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
22 Мб
Скачать
296 Substance Use in Older Adults
skilled nursing facilities, carceral settings, and rehabilitation facilities. We discuss the ethical considerations in this population with an empha­sis on decision-making capacity and respect for autonomy.
COMPREHENSIVE CULTURAL ASSESSMENT OF THE OLDER ADULT WITH A SUBSTANCE USE DISORDER
A cultural assessment elicits information about a patient’s cultural identity, including their self-identification, beliefs, environment, language, and spir­ituality. In the clinical context, such an assessment can be used to better un­derstand a patient’s values, supports, coping styles, and way of understanding their disease or symptoms. We consider a comprehensive cultural assessment to be a key part of caring for any patient. It is of partic­ular importance, however, in a population of older adults with substance use disor A thorough, nonjudgmental history elicits a patient’s beliefs and goals, while establishing the provider as an ally, someone who honors the wis­dom and expertise that the patient brings to their care. Understanding the patient perspective also allows the provider to advocate plan that integrates the patient’s values and community supports.
tural Formulation Interview (CFI), a semi-structured interview that seeks to better u identity influences disease perception, coping mechanisms, and help­seeking behaviors (American Psychiatric Association 2013b; Lewis­Fernández et al. 2014). The CFI for Older Adults (Table 11–1) explores age-
ample 11–1.
ders, given the impact of shame and stigma around substance use.
for a treatment
DSM-5 (American Psychiatric Association 2013a) includes the Cul-
nderstand the individual’s identity, as well as how that
related identity and cultural perceptions of aging.
We provide a model for using the CFI for Older Adults in Case Ex-
Case Example 11–1: “Living under my daughter’s roof”
Mrs. Petrosian is a 72-year-old retired executive assistant with cirrhosis secondary to alcohol use disorder who presents to her primary care doc­tor to establish care, after moving to the area to live with her daughter. While still at her former home in Chicago, she was hospitalized last year for alcohol withdrawal and cirrhosis, then completed a 28-day residen­tial rehabilitation program, followed by an intensive outpatient pro­gram. She currently lives with her husband, daughter, and son-in-law.
Cultural, Structural, and Ethical Considerations 297
Table 11–1. Cultural Formulation Interview for
Older Adults
Conceptions of aging and cultural identity
How would you describe a person of your age?
How does your experience of aging compare to that of your friends and
re
latives who are of a similar age?
Is there anything about being your age that helps you cope with your current
life
situation?
Conceptions of aging in relationship to illness attributions and coping
How does being older influence your [PROBLEM]? Would it have affected
you differently when you were younger?
Are there ways that being older influences how you deal with your
[PROBLEM]? Would you have dealt with it differently when you were younger?
Influence of comorbid medical problems and treatments on illness
Have you had health problems due to your age?
How have your health conditions or the treatments for your health conditions
affected your [PROBLEM]?
Are there any ways that your health conditions or treatments influence how
you deal with your [PROBLEM]?
A
re there things that are important to you that you are unable to do because
of your health or
age?
Quality and nature of social supports and caregiving
Who do you rely on for help or support in your daily life in general? Has this
changed now that you are going through [PROBLEM]?
How has [PROBLEM] affected your relationships with family and friends?
Are you receiving the amount and kind of support you expected?
Do the people you rely on share your view of your [PROBLEM]?
Additional age-related transitions
Are there other changes you are going through related to aging that are
important for us to know about in order to help you with your [PROBLEM]?
298 Substance Use in Older Adults
Table 11–1. Cultural Formulation Interview for
Older Adults (continued)
Positive/negative attitudes toward aging and clinician­patient relationship
How has your age affected how health care providers treat you?
Have any people, including health care providers, discriminated against you
or treated you poorly because of your age? Can you tell me more about that? How has this affected your [PROBLEM] or how you deal with it?
Do you think that the difference in our ages will influence our work in any
way? If so, how?*
Note. The goal of the Cultural Formulation Interview (CFI) for Older Adults is to iden­tify the role of cultural conceptions of aging and aging-related transition in the patient’s
enting problem, referred to in the table as [PROBLEM]. A clinician can incorporate
pres these questions into their psychiatric diagnostic interview. *This question may be asked if there is a significant age difference between the clinician
d the patient.
an
Source. DSM-5 Supplementary Module (American Psychiatric Association 2013b).
She requests connection with ophthalmology for bilateral cataracts, hepatology referral, case management for transportation assistance, and reconnection with mental health resources.
The primary care doctor administers the CFI for Older Adults. She learns that Mrs. Pe came an empty nester.” Her children were not aware of her alcohol use disord
er until about 5 years ago, when she had a fall and was diagnosed with cirrhosis after being found to have ascites and hepatic encephalop­athy. The doctor learns that Mrs. Petrosian has negative views of aging.
esents that her husband, who is 15 years her senior, “has been sick
She r for so long.” In addition to advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, her husband has dementia and has required repeated hospital­izations this past year for falls and aspiration pneumonia. She has not felt she co
uld rely on him emotionally for many years, and her close friends have either passed away or still live back in Chicago. She notes a strained relationship with her daughter, who is struggling to care for both her teenage children and her parents.
Mrs. Petrosian is skeptical of having a doctor who is so much younger than she is. She is worried that the doctor will put more restric­tions on what she can and cannot do, “just like my daughter does.” Mrs. Pe
trosian and her doctor discuss their age difference and expectations for the relationship. The doctor explains that while part of her job is to consider safety concerns, her goal is to support Mrs. Petrosian in living as satisfying and healthy a life as she can.
Mrs. Petrosian’s doctor asks how she envisions her transition to this city and to the clinic. She answers that her priority is to find local Alcohol­ics Anonymous (AA) groups so that she can connect to others in the area and continue in her recovery. She requests assistance with transportation
trosian started drinking heavily at age 40, “after I be-
Cultural, Structural, and Ethical Considerations 299
resources, so that she doesn’t have to rely solely on her daughter to drive her places. Mrs. Petrosian has found that naltrexone and disulfiram work well for her in supporting her abstinence from alcohol, so her doctor con­tinues those prescriptions. They also agree that while her daughter prefers
mpany her to appointments, Mrs. Petrosian prefers to talk about
to acco her alcohol use without her daughter in the room for now. Over the course of the next few months, she attends AA groups locally four times a week and joins a local knitting group. She continues regular primary care ap­pointments and builds trust and connection with her care team.
Cultural Competence, Cultural Humility, and Structural Competence
Cultural competence is a term used to describe behaviors, attitudes, and policies that translate knowledge and value of clients’ cultural beliefs into effective cross-cultural work (Centers for Disease Control and Pre­vention 2021). This concept emphasizes the skills required to provide care to people with different beliefs, behaviors, and needs, with the goal of improving quality of care and ultimately decreasing health dispari­ties (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2021).
While the concept of cultural competence represented an important evolution fro ity,” we also highlight literature that advocates for cultural humility. Such work identifies potent cluding the risk of conceptualizing minoritized patient belief systems as a deviation fr default as a White, cisgender, heterosexual, English-speaking male per­spective (Lekas et al. 2020). The idea of “competence” also assumes that culture is static and cultural groups are homogeneous, which can per­petuate stereotypes; furthermore, we know that people’s beliefs and val­ues relate to a number of intersectional identities (e.g., as an older adult) and that they evolve over time (Lekas et al. 2020).
Cultural humility is an orientation toward caring for patients that hold
s in high regard patients’ expertise on their cultural context; it also requires providers to engage in the practice of self-reflexivity, an intro- spective process of understanding one’s own preconceived notions and the origins of these ideas, as well as the potential impact of these beliefs and biases (Lekas et al. 2020; Patallo 2019; Tervalon and Murray-García
1998). Rather than emphasizing a provider’s efficacy or competence, self-reflexivity prioritizes providers admitting when they do not under­stand something and prompts them to actively learn from patients as
duals (Agner 2020). See Case Example 11–2 for an example of self-
indivi
flexivity from one of the authors.
re
m previous notions of cultural “awareness” or “sensitiv-
ial harms of the notion of cultural competence, in-
om normative provider belief systems, which often set the
300 Substance Use in Older Adults
Case Example 11–2: Example of Self-Reflexivity
A 32-year-old heterosexual multiracial female doctor reflects on her own multidimensional cultural identities. She feels connected to her Mexican lineage and connects with her Spanish-speaking patients; how­ever, she does not have direct experience immigrating to the United States, as of patients with demographics similar to her own, but that similar de­mographics or even language concordance does not mean that she un­derstands the way they experience or articulate the intersection of their identities education level and her position as a doctor. She considers herself an ally to the LGBTQ community but lacks lived experience navigating spaces, including health care settings, with an LGBTQ identity. She grew up in predominantly white settings and considers how this shaped the way she expresses her own cultural identities. She takes an implicit bias test, and her data suggest a slight automatic preference for European Americans over African Americans. She journals about these results and about how she processes this outcome, especially practicing in a predominantly Black city.
many of her patients have. She reflects that she has taken care
. Furthermore, she is in a marked position of power given her
The next term we introduce is structural competency. Metzl and Han­sen (2014) affirmed the importance of individual provider-patient dis­cussions about identity and cultural values, while advocating that providers
go beyond so-called cultural competency to both recognize the impact of and intervene at the levels of institutions and social con­ditions. They defined such structural competency as
[t]he trained ability to discern how a host of issues defined clinically as symptoms, attitudes, or diseases (e.g., depression, hypertension, obesity, smoking, medication “noncompliance,” trauma, psychosis) also represent the downstream implications of a number of upstream decisions about such matters as health care and food delivery systems, zoning laws, urban and rural infrastructures, medicalization, or even about the very definitions of illness and health. (p. 128)
Metzl and Hansen (2014) discussed the structural effects on individ-
ual agency, and on stigma, which is commonly conceived as an inter­personal phenomenon yet is operationalized through institutions and even laws.
They advocated for medical education to better orient learn­ers to the broader social and environmental conditions that manifest themselves
within the clinical space, as this will also prepare clinicians
to address inequities through structural change.
Cultural, Structural, and Ethical Considerations 301
SOCIAL DETERMINANTS OF SUBSTANCE USE IN OLDER ADULTS
The World Health Organization’s Commission on the Social Determinants of Health defines social determinants as “conditions in which people are born, grow, work, live, and age and the wider set of forces and systems shaping the conditions of daily life” (World Health Organization 2023). Such conditions include income, education, food insecurity, housing, ac­cess to affordable health services, and social inclusion. We illustrate the concept of social determinants by applying it to the opioid crisis.
Dasgupta et al. (2018) argued that although the popular narrative has emphasized as drivers of the opioid crisis, this model “ignores root causes,” and a social determinants of health framework must be used to understand and intervene in this public health crisis. Several authors highlight the role of “social distress” and socioeconomic marginalization as upstream forces and describe the interplay between unemployment, working conditions, pain, poverty, social isolation, and substance use (Dasgupta et al. 2018; McLean 2016; van Draanen et al. 2020, 2023; Zoorob and Sa­lemi 2017). Previous literature has similarly demonstrated that social capital and workforce participation are strong predictors of drug over­dose among non-Hispanic Whites (Heyman et al. 2019); in such works, social capital describes norms ar nity objectives, which includes percentage of active voters and mem­bership rates in political and professional organizations (Heyman et al.
2019). Interestingly, income inequality and lack of upward income mo­bility correlated more strongly with overdoses than absolute measures of income or poverty
An estimated 50% of older adults who live alone have inadequate fi­nancial resources to pay for their basic needs (Mutchler et al. 2019). Meanwhile, older adults face relationship losses and functional de­clines, which affect social connectedness (Donovan and Blazer 2020). An estimated 24% isolated, which reflects physical isolation, size of social network, and frequency of contact with family and friends (Anderson and Thayer
2018). Those who experience social isolation are more likely to be un­married, with lower education and income, than those who are not so­cially isolated (Cudjoe et al. 2020).
We use this structural lens to examine data on disparities within the care distinction between discussion of cultural factors, which allows us to
the role of physicians and pharmaceutical companies
ound cooperation to achieve commu-
rates (Heyman et al. 2019).
of community-dwelling adults age >65 are socially
302 Substance Use in Older Adults
better understand and align ourselves with individual patients, and broader discussion of the role of race and ethnicity in the treatment of adults with substance use disorders in the United States. The latter topic requires examining the structural drivers of substance use prevalence and outcomes.
RACIAL AND ETHNIC DISPARITIES IN THE TREATMENT OF SUBSTANCE USE DISORDERS
Because there is limited literature on older adults who belong to mi­nority groups, this section reviews literature focused on the larger adult population.
Medication Access
Medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD), including methadone, buprenorphine, and naltrexone, have been shown to be safe and effica­cious across racial/ethnic groups in the treatment of opioid use disor­der. However, research has shown disparities in MOUD initiation among racial/ethnic groups. One study demonstrated that Black and Latino patients have a nearly 30% lower odds of receiving MOUD than White patients in short-term treatment settings (Stahler et al. 2021). An­other study of individuals with OUD in western Pennsylvania found that even after co Black enrollees were 18% less likely to start MOUD compared with White enrollees (Hollander et al. 2021).
Within MOUD, there are important divides. Methadone is dis­pensed from federally regulated clinics and involves considerable sur­veillance and frequent visits, whereas buprenorphine allows for more flexibility in clinic-based settings. Studies have illustrated a “bifurcated opioid treatment system” in which higher-income White patients re­ceive naltrexone and buprenorphine, whereas lower-income Black or Latino patients are more likely to receive methadone (Guerrero et al. 2022; Hansen and Roberts 2012; Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration 2020).
ntrolling for gender, age, and Medicaid eligibility,
Treatment Programs
There is evidence that Latino individuals do benefit from treatment, yet compared with White individuals, Latinos are less likely to engage with
Cultural, Structural, and Ethical Considerations 303
or complete treatment (Guerrero et al. 2013b; Stahler and Mennis 2018). Similarly, although treatment does appear beneficial if accessed, Black people initiate and complete substance use treatment for OUD at lower rates than their White counterparts (Jordan et al. 2021; Lappan et al. 2020; Mennis et al. 2019; Stahler and Mennis 2018; Wu et al. 2016).
Explanations for Racial and Ethnic Disparities
Significant previous literature identifies structural racism within hous­ing, health care, and carceral systems and connects structural racism to
tance use outcome disparities through environmental, social, and
subs psychological pathways (Hollander et al. 2021; Krawczyk et al. 2017; Mennis and Stahler 2016; Schmidt et al. 2007; van Draanen et al. 2023; Verissimo and Grella 2017). One manifestation of structural racism is that clinics that dispense naltrexone and buprenorphine tend to be in higher-income White neighborhoods, while methadone clinics tend to be in lower-income Black or Latino neighborhoods (Goedel et al. 2020; Guerrero et al. 2022; Schuler et al. 2021). Another manifestation is that Latino patients may struggle to find Spanish-speaking providers and counselors in addiction treatment settings, and undocumented patients may fear risk of deportation if they engage with treatment (Guerrero et al. 2013a; Pagano 2014; Vargas Bustamante et al. 2012).
In addition to structural determinants of health, some work focuses
ttitudes and social norms as barriers to care. For example, qualita-
on a tive research on barriers to specialty substance use treatment among La
tino clients identified several unique themes, including perceived lack of social support from family, non-abstinence treatment goals, and low perceived treatment efficacy (Pinedo et al. 2018).
Interventions
The following section explores interventions proposed to better serve minoritized groups. We present this literature while acknowledging that minoritized groups are often pooled for the purpose of research but in reality are not homogeneous.
Linguistic capabilities are a first step for supporting treatment en­gagement of non-English-speaking patients in the United States. The pres
ence of language translators has indeed been shown to increase treatment completion among Latino clients (Guerrero et al. 2012). How­ever, availability of Spanish-language services alone does not mean that the services are culturally appropriate or align with the knowledge, at­titudes, and experiences of patients (Pagano 2014; Pinedo et al. 2018).
304 Substance Use in Older Adults
Previous literature has explored the role of cultural concordance be­tween the patient and the clinician, through matching of race/ethnicity, language, and socioeconomic status; such literatu of increased patient satisfaction and increased retention (Guerrero et al. 2012; Sue et al. 1991). As for addiction treatment settings specifically, a 2022 qualitative study of Black adults in Kentucky with recent opioid misuse identified a common preference among patients for providers with similar racial identities and substance use histories (Hargons et al.
2022).
Studies that incorporate family members into treatment may also in­crease treatment engagement. Patients in the same Kentucky study
fied relational support as central to their treatment experience,
identi and the authors suggested that it may be culturally responsive to in­volve supportive individuals into treatment of Black individuals (Har­gons et al. 2022). Similarly, work focused on Latino communities has posited that this model would also be suited for Latino communities, by incorporating the cultural value of familismo (Pinedo et al. 2018).
Lastly, given the core structural drivers of inequity, many authors advocate for focu form, eliminating barriers to MOUD access, cultivating a more cultur­ally and linguistically diverse health care workforce, and increasing
dable housing (Guerrero et al. 2013c, 2022; Hollander et al. 2021;
affor van Draanen et al. 2023).
s on structural changes, including carceral system re-
re has found evidence
CAPACITY, AUTONOMY, AND COERCION
This section presents related yet distinct topics regarding patient agency within substance use treatment. We begin with defining deci­sion-making capacity. We discuss perspectives on substance use and autonomy sion and coercion.
Decision-Making Capacity
Decision-making capacity refers to the ability to understand and articu- late a decision. The standard framework for assessing decision-mak­ing capacity includes four components: 1) understanding the decision;
2) expr tives; and 4) reasoning (Roberts and Dyer 2004). Capacity is distinct from cognition, functional status, or competence. Any clinician can assess deci­sion-making capacity. Furthermore, it is important to remember that decision-making capaci
, involuntary treatment, and the distinction between persua-
essing a choice; 3) appreciation of risks, benefits, and alterna-
ty is evaluated for a particular clinical question,
Cultural, Structural, and Ethical Considerations 305
not as an all-encompassing state. It is inappropriate to draw conclu­sions about decision-making capacity based on age or substance use history alone.
An older adul question, such as whether to under ture, yet lack decision-making capacity with regard to long-term place­ment. Importantly, having a designated surrogate decision-maker does not mea rogate decision-maker’s perspective.
ing substance use and neuropsychiatric pathology (namely, a patient with alcohol us thereby potentially losing capacity to make medical decisions) (Walaszek 2019). Thus, providers should engage the patient in appro­priate evaluation when concerns arise. However, a substance use his­tory alone does not mean that a patient is unable to engage in clinical de should be evaluated separately, and patients should be given informa­tion relevant to the clinical decision at hand. It is also worth noting that a person who is experiencing acute intoxication or withdrawal may or may not have decision-making capacity during that short-term period, but that does not mean that the person generally lacks the ability to en­gage in care decisions.
n that a patient’s input should be overlooked in favor of the sur-
The care team should remain aware that there is evidence connect-
cision-making. Ultimately, as stated previously, each clinical question
t may have decision-making capacity for a particular
go orthopedic surgery for a hip frac-
e disorder is at higher risk of developing dementia,
Autonomy in Persons With Substance Use Disorders
There is long-standing debate in mental health and substance use fields regarding the concept of autonomy in this patient population.
Some argue that substance use disorders impair one’s ability to care for oneself or thus that mandated treatment can actually restore patient autonomy. They consider that loss of control and continued use despite harms are part of the definition of addiction (Cavaiola and Dolan 2016); therefore, if a medication can safely decrease cravings and use, and in doing so re­store personal autonomy, short-term mandated treatment could be eth­ically justifiable (Caplan 2008). This may be likened to the practice of involu
ntary psychiatric hospitalization, when a patient is treated against their will because their agency has been compromised by men­tal illness. One example of a civil commitment law is the Marchman Act in Florida, which allows for 7 days of commitment to stabilize a pa­tient, in hopes that the patient will regain rational decision-making ca-
behave in alignment with one’s values and desires, and