Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5538_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
22 Мб
Скачать
256 Substance Use in Older Adults
significant results in head-to-head comparisons, being superior to CBT (OR 2.44, 95% CI 0.02–5.88, P =0.045), noncontingent rewards (OR 3.31, 95% CI 1
wards (OR 4.07, 95% CI 1.13–14.69, P=0.031). The combination of
re community re ficacious than CBT alone, contingency management alone, contingency management plus CBT, or 12-step program plus noncontingent rewards (ORs 2.50 [P=0.039] to 5.22 [P< 0.001]).
comes in those using stimulants, contingency-based approaches seem to be mos remains a concern for many seeking treatment. More research exploring the implementation and viability of such approaches in community care settings is warranted. For those with cognitive impairment, ther­apy would be challenging and potentially less beneficial. Depending on the level of cogni with cognitive impairment in activities of daily function can help with the amount of use (e.g., decreasing the availability of substance or pro­viding distractions).
.32–8.28, P =0.010), and 12-step program plus noncontingent
inforcement with contingency management was more ef-
Although multiple psychosocial treatment options improve out-
t successful. Limited access to contingency-based programs
tive impairment, involving those who assist patients
Pharmacological Interventions for Methamphetamine Use Disorder
There are no FDA-approved medications for MUD, but studies have been conducted in several classes of medications. Unfortunately, small sample sizes and differences in clinical design and outcomes have lim­ited the interpretation of these studies and conclusions reached with systematic reviews, and more research is needed in this field. Clinicians should be aware of the existing evidence for treatment, however, which is summarized in this section by medication class. The literature on pharmacotherapy treatments is sparse and mostly conducted in a younger population. There are no specific treatment trials for older adults, and the evidence we summarize here is extrapolated from the general adult population.
Antidepressants
One systematic review (Bhatt et al. 2016) and three trials (Colfax et al. 2011; Elkashef et al. 2008; Shoptaw et al. 2006) examining antidepres­sants found no difference between antidepressants and placebo in ab­stinence, retention, or adverse effects. Specifically, an RCT comparing placebo to sertraline with and without continency management found
Stimulant Use Disorder in Older Adults 257
that those receiving sertraline were less likely to remain in and or achieve abstinence (Shoptaw et al. 2006). A small trial (N = 60) compar­ing mirtazapine to placebo in men who have sex with men found that those r et al. 2011), but further studies are needed. The systematic review and one RCT (Elkashef et al. 2008) found that bupropion was not different from placebo in outcomes.
eceiving mirtazapine had more negative urine analyses (Colfax
Antipsychotics
Two RCTs compared aripiprazole to placebo and found no difference in sustained abstinence, use, retention, or harms (Coffin et al. 2013; Tii­honen et al. 2007).
Psychostimulants
A systematic review of 11 RCTs examining three psychostimulants (dexa­mphetamine, modafinil, methylphenidate) provided low-strength evi­dence that psychostimulants provide no benefit over placebo across
tcomes (sustained abstinence, use, retention, adverse effects).
all ou Modafinil or dexamphetamine were not superior to placebo in any outcome; methylphenidate had low-strength evidence of less meth­amphetamine use (Bhatt et al. 2016). Given the varying quality and hetero
geneity of the trials, these results need further investigation.
Muscle Relaxants and Anticonvulsants
One RCT (N = 140) found lower methamphetamine use in patients treated with topiramate versus placebo (Elkashef et al. 2012), but this re­sult should be interpreted with caution given lack of replication. A
all trial (N=88) compared baclofen, gabapentin, and placebo and
sm found no dif phetamine use disorder (Heinzerling et al. 2006).
ference in outcomes related to methamphetamine/am-
Naltrexone
Four studies on naltrexone had varying trial parameters and showed mixed results. One United States–based trial (N=100) studying men who have sex with men given naltr found no difference in use or retention (Coffin et al. 2018). An Icelandic trial (Runarsdottir et al. 2017) compared patients transitioning from in­patient to outpatient who received naltrexone injections or placebo and
exone and behavioral interventions
258 Substance Use in Older Adults
found no difference in outcomes. A Swedish trial in newly abstinent pa­tients found that patients with naltrexone had a higher percentage of negati
ve UDS results (Jayaram-Lindström et al. 2008). A Russian trial
studying patients with comorbid amphetamine and opioid dependence found a nonsignificant trend favoring naltrexone for negative UDS re­sults (Tiihonen et al. 2012).
Combining Medications
A recent multisite placebo-controlled trial (N=403) evaluated combin­ing extended-release injectable high-dose naltrexone plus an oral max­imum dose of bupropion for the treatment of MUD (Trivedi et al. 2021). Patients r who did not respond were randomly assigned to receive either the treatment or placebo for the next 6 weeks. The overall response for the trial was low, but there was a significant difference in response between the treatment arm (13.6%) and the placebo arm (2.5%).
eceived the treatment arm or placebo for 6 weeks, and those
Pharmacological Interventions for Cocaine Use Disorder
Although there has been more research than for MUD, no medications have been approved to treat cocaine use disorder. The existing evidence is summarized in this section by medication class. No studies specifi­cally examined older adults, and the available evidence is mainly from a general adult population.
Antidepressants
The most comprehensive systematic review of 37 trials (N =3,551) cov­ering two major classes (tricyclics and SSRIs) as well as bupropion, ne­fazodone, class of pharmacotherapy was not more effective than placebo in co­caine use disorder. No significant differences were found for continu­ous abstinence, dropout rates, or safety. Average number of weeks in treatment slightly fa report scores. New RCTs have been published since then, and one addi­tional systematic review has been published on bupropion.
Sertraline. Recently abstinent patients remained abstinent longer on se
rtraline than placebo while receiving CBT (Oliveto et al. 2012). An­other trial, which compared sertraline and combined sertraline and gab­apentin with placebo in r receiving CBT and contingency management, found that relapse rates
and venlafaxine was published in 2011 (Pani et al. 2011). This
vored antidepressants, as well as depression self-
ecently abstinent patients concurrently
Stimulant Use Disorder in Older Adults 259
were lower in the sertraline group, but not in the sertraline and gabapen­tin group (Mancino et al. 2014). Retention rates did not differ. For un­known reasons, other SSRIs have not shown a similar level of efficacy.
Venlafaxine. An RCT of patients with comorbid depression showed that the placebo (Raby et al. 2014).
Mirtazapine. In a small RCT of patients with comorbid depression, pa- tients did not differ in cocaine consumption with mirtazapine versus plac
Bupropion. Evidence regarding bupropion is mixed. A systematic re- view covering three trials found superiority of bupropion over placebo for abstinence and
2019). In contrast, one of the largest multisite, placebo-controlled RCTs evaluating methadone-maintained individuals with co-occurring co­caine dependence found no difference in use, depression, or psychoso­cial functioning for those treated with bupropion versus placebo (Margolin et al. 199
re was no difference in relapse or use between venlafaxine and
ebo (Afshar et al. 2012).
no difference in overall cocaine use (Chan et al.
5).
Dopamine Agonists
A 2015 systematic review of 24 trials found no differences between any dopamine agonist (amantadine, bromocriptine, golide, cabergoline, hydergine, pramipexole) and placebo on retention, abstinence, or adverse events (Minozzi et al. 2015a).
L-dopa/carbidopa, per-
Antipsychotics
A systematic review of 14 RCTs studying seven medications (risperi­done, olanzapine, quetiapine, lamotrigine, aripiprazole, haloperidol, and reserpine) showed no difference of antipsychotics over placebo in terms of cocaine use, cravings, adverse events, side effects, or improved treatment retention (Indave et al. 2016). An RCT of aripiprazole versus placebo given to methadone-maintained patients with comorbid co­caine use disorder that also received contingency management and achieved abstinence within 12 weeks had similar results in abstinence, time to relapse, retention, and harm (Moran et al. 2017).
Psychostimulants
A 2016 Cochrane Review included 26 trials (N= 2,366) and examined nine medications (modafinil, mazindol, methylphenidate, dexamphet­amine, lisdexamfetamine, methamphetamine, mixed amphetamine
260 Substance Use in Older Adults
salts, selegiline, and bupropion, which we covered earlier in “Antide­pressants”) (Castells et al. 2016). Overall, psychostimulants were well tolerated had improved sustained abstinence, which was defined as 3 weeks of nonuse, but the mean days of use and treatment retention did not differ. Subanalyses showed that methadone-maintained patients with comor­bid opioid use disorder and cocaine use disorder, and those without co­morbid ADHD, benefited the most. Subsequent studies suggested that patients with comorbid alcohol use disorder and cocaine use disorder might need higher doses of psychostimulants. The most promising medications in the study were dexamphetamine, mixed amphetamine salts, and bupropion. The authors concluded that further research is warranted owing to the low quality of the studies included. Mazindol was underpowered in the studies, and no significant difference was found. No difference was found regarding methylphenidate, metham­phetamine, lisdexamfetamine, selegiline, or modafinil for outcomes.
Dexamphetamine. A few additional studies on psychostimulants have been con dexamphetamine in treatment-refractory heroin- and cocaine-dependent individuals found that dexamphetamine resulted in fewer days of co­caine use compared with placebo (Nuijten et al. 2016).
and did not have serious adverse effects. Experimental groups
ducted since the 2016 Cochrane Review. One RCT using oral
Mixed Amphetamine Salts. A large study showed that mixed amphet­amine salts resulted in better sustained abstinence than placebo in pa­tients with comorbid ADHD and cocaine use disorder (Levin et al. 2015) and that abstinence likely pr al. 2018).
Modafinil. Studies on modafinil have mixed results. A meta-analysis
studies (N=896) comparing modafinil with placebo found that
of 11 modafi rates (this was influenced by one negative study) (Sangroula et al. 2017). The meta-analysis found that modafinil was superior in terms of fewer days of cocaine use, and a subgroup analysis of United States–based studies showed that it improved abstinence rates.
nil was well tolerated but did not benefit retention or abstinence
eceded improvements in ADHD (Levin et
Anticonvulsants and Muscle Relaxants
One systematic review (20 RCTs; N =2,068) of anticonvulsant drugs ex­amined carbamazepine, gabapentin, lamotrigine, phenytoin, tiagabine, topiramate, ences in retention for any anticonvulsant pharmacotherapy except for ga
bapentin (favoring placebo) and vigabatrin (favoring treatment but
and vigabatrin (Minozzi et al. 2015b). There were no differ-
Stimulant Use Disorder in Older Adults 261
not reaching statistical difference). No differences were found in terms of cocaine use, craving, severity of substance use, depression, anxiety, or treatment retention.
Topiramate. Additional studies since that review was published add to the evidence of treatment options. One small RC mate significantly improved abstinence and retention (Baldaçara et al.
2016). A meta-analysis of five studies (N= 518) on topiramate found that y increase continuous abstinence (Singh et al. 2016). An RCT on
it ma topiramate in treatment of crack cocaine dependence found that topira­mate reduced the quantity and frequency of use and the money spent on cocaine in the first 4 weeks but was equal to placebo by 12 weeks (Baldaçara et al. 2016).
Vigabatrin. Two RCTs on vigabatrin have been published and found no differences in outcomes (Oliveto et al. 2011; Somoza et al. 2013).
Baclofen. The only muscle relaxant examined so far was baclofen, which had no ef 2012; Kahn et al. 2009).
fect on any outcomes compared with placebo (Kablinger et al.
T found that topira-
Cognitive-Enhancing Drugs
Two small RCTs examined memantine and atomoxetine, with contin­gency management, versus placebo and found no significant difference in outc
omes (Bisaga et al. 2010; Walsh et al. 2013).
Anxiolytics
One small, multisite RCT compared buspirone to placebo, placebo plus contingency management, and once-weekly optional individual or group psychosocial treatment and found no difference in outcomes (Winhusen et al. 2014).
Pharmacotherapies in Other Substance Use Disorders
Disulfiram. A 2010 systematic review of seven studies on disulfiram (N=492) for cocaine use disorder found trends favoring disulfiram that did not re owing to different outcomes. Other studies found no difference be­tween disulfiram and placebo in terms of abstinence (Carroll et al. 2016; Schottenfeld et al. 2014) or use (Carroll et al. 2012, 2016; Kosten et al. 2013; Oliveto et al. 2011), but significant difference in retention, with those receiving disulfiram less likely to be in treatment and having more side effects, namely elevated liver enzymes and rash.
ach significance (Pani et al. 2010). Studies could not be pooled
262 Substance Use in Older Adults
Acamprosate. One study found no difference between acamprosate and placebo (Kampman et al. 2011).
Naltrexone. Most studies of naltrexone in cocaine use disorder in­volved patients with comorbid alcohol use disorder. Several studies found no dif Pettinati et al. 2008, 2014; Schmitz et al. 2009). One study of naltrexone and behavioral intervention on patients with comorbid cocaine use dis­order and alcohol use disorder found no difference in cocaine use, and odds of a heavy drinking
Varenicline. One study found cocaine use to be lower with varenicline, but the
2012); another conducted in opioid-dependent patients did not find dif­ferences in use or retention (Poling et al. 2010).
ference between naltrexone and placebo (Hersh et al. 1998;
day were reduced (Schmitz et al. 2009).
difference did not reach statistical significance (Plebani et al.
Opiate Agonists
Two RCTs compared methadone to buprenorphine in comorbid cocaine and opioid use, and found, with insufficient strength of evidence, lon­ger abstinence and better retention with methadone (Schottenfeld et al. 1997,
2005). Similarly, an RCT found that 16 mg of buprenorphine (but not 4 mg) and naloxone resulted in less use than placebo, but with in­sufficient strength of evidence and no difference in abstinence and re­tention rates (Ling et al. 2016).
Research around pharmacological treatment for cocaine use disor­der has not shown strong evidence for any one therapy to be applied consistently for FDA. There are promising results, but much more research should be done before any pharmacotherapy becomes the standard of care. Famil­iarity with the available evidence, however, can help clinicians weigh benefits evidence for treatment of stimulant use disorders remains psychother­apy treatments.
and risks in treating each individual patient. Currently, the best
clinical use. No pharmacotherapies are approved by the
Other Approaches
There are promising lines of investigation for the nonpsychosocial treat­ment of stimulant use disorders, but none have been approved by the
TA-CD, an active cocaine vaccine, stimulates antibodies that bind
FDA. to cocaine and prevent it from crossing the blood–brain barrier. It has shown positive results in animal models but mixed results in clinical tri­als. One trial of methadone-maintained patients with comorbid cocaine use di
sorder had greater abstinence from cocaine in those who had
Stimulant Use Disorder in Older Adults 263
higher IgG antibody levels (Martell et al. 2009). A Phase III clinical trial in humans showed no difference between TA-CD and placebo regard­less of IgG antibody levels (Kosten et al. 2014). TA-CD is being studied in huma well-defined complementary/alternative medicine approaches for stimulant use disorder.
ns but so far has not proven to be clinically useful. There are no
SUMMARY
The rate of stimulant use disorders (namely, methamphetamine and cocaine) has rapidly increased in the past two decades, and these dis­orders are associated with serious mental and physical comorbidities. Clinicians use and of withdrawal syndromes for proper management. General screening tools for substance use can be applied to stimulant misuse, but the diagnosis is made based on DSM criteria. Although there are no FDA-approved medications for stimulant use disorders, psychoso­cial interventions have been shown to be effective and are considered the st older adults with stimulant use disorder, and much of what we know is extrapolated from the general adult population. Clinicians should not assume older adults are less likely to change or benefit from treatment. In taking care of older adults, providers should consider cognitive and physical impairments, independence in activities of daily living, and family involvement.
should be aware of the presentations of acute and chronic
andard of care. There are no specific guidelines or evidence for
KEY POINTS
• Methamphetamine and cocaine use disorders constitute the ma­jority of stimulant use disorders. Methamphetamines are synthetic drugs
and are the fastest growing drug of misuse worldwide. Co­caine is a natural substance extracted from the coca plant and ex­ists in two forms: cocaine salt (cocaine HCl), a water-soluble powder that is used in injections; and cocaine base (“crack”), a water-insoluble rock that is often smoked and is preferred by older adults.
• Excessive methamphetamine use can lead to death through myo­cardial infarction, stroke, hypertensive crisis, or hyperpyretic crisis.
• Regular methamphetamine use leads to poor cognition, poor den­tition, psychiatric conditions, sexually transmitted diseases, and
264 Substance Use in Older Adults
cardiovascular pathology. Users who develop psychosis are clini­cally indistinguishable from those with paranoid schizophrenia.
• Excessive acute use of cocaine can lead to coronary adverse events, stroke, ar nary toxicity, and tactile hallucinations. Most cocaine users use low amounts in low frequencies.
• Long-term cocaine use is associated with increased psychiatric
nditions, decreased libido, male impotence, gastric ulcers, car-
co diopulmonary dysfunction, and cognitive impairment.
• Stimulant withdrawal is marked by sedation, hyperphagia, dys­phoria, and crav during this time.
• Cocaine supplies can be adulterated by levamisole, which causes agranulocytosis and vasculiti amine supplies are increasingly adulterated with fentanyl, which leads to respiratory depression and has been a driver of deaths among stimulant users.
• The diagnosis of stimulant use disorder is made using DSM crite­ria. Urine drug screens are specific for cocaine; methamphet­amines are prone to false positives.
• Psychosocial treatment, particularly contingency management,
en shown to be effective and is the standard of care for stim-
has be ulant use disorders.
• There are no FDA-approved medications for either methamphet­amine or cocaine use disorder.
rythmias, headache, hyperthermia, acute pulmo-
ing of substance. Increased suicidality occurs
s. Both cocaine and methamphet-
RESOURCES FOR PATIENTS, FAMILIES, AND CAREGIVERS
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
(SAMHSA) (www.samhsa.gov) is the agency within the U.S. De­partment of Health and Human Services that leads public health
to advance the behavioral health of the nation. SAMHSA
efforts has educational resources on stimulant use disorder, resources for families coping with mental illness or substance use, information on how to find treatment, and treatment locators.
Stimulant Use Disorder in Older Adults 265
National Helpline: Free 24/7 treatment referral and information ser-
vice available in English and Spanish: 1-800-662-HELP (4357)
24/7 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline:
Call or text 988
National Alliance on Mental Illness
The National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI; www.nami.org/
home) is the nation’s largest grassroots mental health organization dedicated to building better lives for the milli fected by mental illness. Their website provides mental health edu­cation for families and peer-led support groups for individuals and families. They also have online discussion groups and information on how to get involved in advocacy.
Helpline: Text “Helpline” to 62640 or call 1-800-950-NAMI (6264)
Mo
nday–Friday 10
trained and can provide information, referrals, and resources.
A.M. to 10 P.M. Eastern time. Volunteers are
ons of Americans af-
Al-Anon Family Groups
Al-Anon (https://al-anon.org) is a mutual support program for
those whose lives have been impacted by a loved one’s substance use. Their site helps people locate local support groups.
RESOURCES FOR CLINICIANS
National Institute on Drug Abuse
The National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) sites listed here
provide summaries of research regarding cocaine and metham­phetamine and their associated use disorders.
Cocaine Research Report: What Is Cocaine? https://nida.nih.gov/
publications/research-reports/cocaine/what-cocaine
Methamphetamine Research Report: https://nida.nih.gov/
publications/research-reports/methamphetamine/overview
REFERENCES
Afshar M, Knapp CM, Sarid-Segal O, et al: The efficacy of mirtazapine in the
treatment of cocaine dependence with comorbid depression. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 38(2):181–186, 2012 22221171