Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_1054_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
23 Мб
Скачать
Overview ofCurriculum
https://t.me/medicina_free
andTraining forOncoplastic Breast Surgery
Chintamani, RohanKhandelwal, andS.V.S.Deo
36
36.1 Introduction
With the increasing incidence of breast cancer worldwide [1], quality care with improved out­comes is the need of the hour. Breast cancer man­agement has also undergone remarkable changes in the last couple of decades with multi-modality approach becoming the norm across the world, that has denitely lead to better patient related outcomes. Along with other modalities, surgical management has also evolved over time [2]. There is a paradigm shift in the surgical approach for breast cancer management from radical muti­lating surgeries to organ conservation approach [3]. Apart from oncological goals the focus of current era breast surgeons is on cosmetic out­comes and quality of life issues. This has also led surgeons to enhance their knowledge and skill set to deliver better results to patients leading to the development of structured curriculum and train­ing programmes in some countries [4, 5].
Oncoplastic surgery (OPS), a term coined by the German surgeon Audretsch encompasses pro­cedures to resect the tumour followed by imme-
Chintamani VMMC, New Delhi, India
R. Khandelwal CK Birla Hospital, Gurgaon, India
S. V. S. Deo (*) Department of Surgical Oncology, BRAIRCH &NCI, AIIMS, New Delhi, India
diate breast reconstruction by applying the principles of cosmetic surgery [6]. The practice of oncoplastic surgery, however, varies depend­ing on the social, geographic, and economic fac­tors of the region, country or the continent. In the developed nations, OPS is primarily focused on reconstruction following surgery for early breast cancer whereas in developing countries it may include repairing the surgical defect left behind after resection of relatively larger tumours [7].
Despite being a relatively new concept, OPS has attracted lot of attention from breast surgeons for various reasons and an important one being lack of breast dedicated and optimally trained plastic surgeon at most centres. Additionally, the lack of uniformity in the form of resources and training across the world has put the onus on sur­gical oncologist / general surgeon to enhance one’s skills in order to offer the best possible ablative and reconstructive options to the patients [8]. Multiple studies have demonstrated better patient related outcomes for surgeons that are focussed on breast surgery rather than the general surgeons. Higher patient satisfaction scores have also been reported when patient care is handled by a breast focussed surgeon [9]. All these points have sparked a keen interest in OPS training across the world.
Different countries have different sets of doc­tors taking care of breast cancer. In most coun­tries, it falls under the domain of surgical oncologist / general surgeons whereas there are
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2023 S. V. S. Deo (ed.), Breast Oncoplasty and Reconstruction,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5536-7_36
291
292
https://t.me/medicina_free
Chintamani et al.
countries where gynaecologists may be dealing with breast cancer [10]. With increasing popular­ity and acceptance of OPS, breed of dedicated full-time breast surgeons is emerging in recent past. Training in OPS is usually not a part of the curriculum during the basic surgical residency. A curriculum for structured training of general or onco-surgeons in the eld of OPS is mandatory in order to achieve better oncological and cos­metic outcomes.
36.2 Classication ofOncoplastic Procedures forTraining Purposes
Although, there are multiple classications of oncoplastic procedures, the one proposed by Urban in 2010, pertains to a three tiers system (Table36.1). This classication is useful in certi­fying breast surgeons at different levels of experi­ence. According to this classication and in order to clear this certication, the trainee not only
requires specic knowledge of plastic surgery but also adequate knowledge of radiology, pathol­ogy, surgery, medical and radiation oncology [11]. Another practical classication by Krishna Clough, helps surgeon not only in identifying the procedure to be planned for a particular patient but also stepwise approach for surgeons to learn OPS.The bilevel classication recommends that if less than 20% of the breast volume is excised, then a level 1 procedure is adequate and most of these can be performed by any breast surgeon without any formal training in plastic surgery. If between 20% and 50% of the breast volume is excised, then principles of mammoplasty need to be utilized to carry out effective reconstruction. To perform Level II surgeries, a surgeon requires specialized training in OPS [12, 13].The authors are also of the opinion that basic training in breast surgery is a pre-requisite to learning advanced oncoplastic breast surgeries.
36.3 Current Status ofOPS Training Across theWorld
Table 36.1 Three tiers system classications of breast
oncoplastic procedures
Class-1 Class-2 Class-3 Monolateral
breast reconstruction techniques such as aesthetic skin incisions, deepithelization of the areolar margins, glandular mobilization and reshaping techniques, purse string sutures for central quadrant reconstruction, immediate breast reconstruction with temporary expanders. These basic oncoplastic techniques do not require specic plastic surgical training.
Bilateral procedures: Immediate and delayed breast reconstruction with implants, lipolling, breast augmentation, breast reduction, mastopexy, Grisotti ap, nipple and areola reconstruction. Here it is necessary a specic plastic skill to do a good symmetrization.
Mono or bilateral more complex procedures involving autologous aps (pedicled or free aps), or combination of techniques.
In terms of basic training, not many differences have been observed in various countries. As men­tioned earlier, it is usually surgeons– general sur­geons, breast surgeons, plastic surgeons, onco-surgeons and sometimes gynaecologists who deal with the surgical management of breast cancer. Studies have demonstrated that majority of these surgeons are not exposed to OPS during their surgical residency or post-graduate training. Specialized courses and fellowships are therefore required to train surgeons in this eld [8, 10, 14]. .Many countries have formally started OPS train­ing modules in the last decade. United Kingdom has been the forerunner in the eld of OPS and since 2002, formal OPS training has been incor­porated in the curriculum. Trainees from both general surgery and plastic surgery background are accepted for limited OPS training spots, mak­ing it a highly competitive fellowship [15].
Brazil was one of the rst countries to estab­lish a training oncoplastic breast centre. A 21module course was outlined, which consisted of theoretical and practical knowledge being
36 Overview ofCurriculum andTraining forOncoplastic Breast Surgery
https://t.me/medicina_free
293
imparted to surgeons over 1 weekend per month. Analysis of the module revealed it to be effective in training surgeons in OPS.At the beginning of the course, only three quarters of the surgeons were able to perform level-1 OPS) and none of them were capable of performing level-2 and level-3 procedures. A feedback conducted at the conclusion of the course revealed all surgeons were capable of performing at least level-2 pro­cedures [16].
In France, obstetrics and gynaecology trainees can opt for 1year of OPS training after complet­ing 3years of experience in gynaecology, breast surgical oncology or plastic surgery [12, 13]. Although breast surgical oncology training in the USA was formalized in 2003, a survey of the early graduates demonstrated that only 53% felt well prepared to perform oncoplastic breast sur­gery. This has led to increasing number of breast fellowship programmes in the USA with specic focus on OPS training [17, 18].Canada has also successfully implemented a 1-year training fel­lowship in OPS with the aim that graduating fel­lows can independently perform level-1 and 2 OPS, in addition to implant based reconstruc­tions [8].
OPS is a relatively new concept in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) like India. There is a shortage of trained general surgeons, surgical oncologists, and plastic surgeons. However, the awareness and interest among sur­geons regarding OPS is increasing. In certain LMICs like India dedicated breast surgery soci­ety (Association of Breast Surgeons of India) was established to improve breast health care. These societies in collaboration with other international scientic associations are playing a signicant role in propagating OPS training among surgeons dealing with surgery. Because of the scarcity of well-trained breast focussed plastic surgeons across the LMICs the authors feel that it is most feasible if well-trained oncoplastic surgeons per­form both the resection and reconstruction of breast cancer patient or in other words justify the “one surgeon– dual role” concept. This arrange- ment would not only be more cost effective for
the patient but would also ensure better delivery of care as well. To address this issue, senior onco­plastic surgeons from India and UK have created a structured training programme for budding oncoplastic surgeons [www.breastoncoplasty.
org]. This programme aspires to provide the nec-
essary theoretical and practical knowledge of OPS to trainees through a mix of online and ofine training methods [19, 20].
As far as curriculum is concerned any onco­plasty training programme or fellowship should encompass the following domains including anatomy, pathology, imaging, multidisciplinary treatment approach, oncologic and plastic surgi­cal components. Majority of countries running OPS fellowships have adopted a 1-year training policy. It has been observed that prociency in both level I and II can be obtained by trainees over a 1-year period. The authors also feel that a 1 to 2year dedicated training period (depending on the case load at the training facility) is suf­cient for a candidate with a basic post-graduation/ residency training in general surgery/surgical oncology backgrounds. In recent past exclusive breast surgery training programmes (MCh Breast surgery/Breast and endocrine surgery) are also being initiated in some countries.
36.4 Conclusion
In the ever evolving eld of breast cancer man­agement, oncoplastic breast surgery is fast assuming a pivotal role. OPS not only helps in providing better quality of life outcomes to patients but also helps in effective utilization of surgical resources at places where the availability of a trained and breast focussed plastic surgeon is a concern.
A holistic OPS training module of adequate duration should be implemented to train surgeons with basic training in breast surgery. As the per­ceptions of breast cancer patients to surgery vary from one geography to the other, it is better if an OPS trainee gets some international exposure post the completion of the fellowship.
294
https://t.me/medicina_free
Chintamani et al.
References
1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 coun­tries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209–49. https://doi.
org/10.3322/caac.21660.
2. Riis M. Modern surgical treatment of breast cancer. Ann Med Surg. 2020;56:95–107.,ISSN 2049-0801.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2020.06.016.
3. Bao X, Sun K, Tian X, Yin Q, Jin M, Yu N, Jiang H, Zhang J, Hu Y. Present and changing trends in surgical modalities and neoadjuvant chemo­therapy administration for female breast cancer in Beijing, China: a 10-year (2006–2015) retrospec­tive hospitalization summary report-based study. Thorac Cancer. 2018;9:707–17. https://doi.
org/10.1111/1759- 7714.12636.
4. Chintamani. The paradigm shifts in the manage­ment of breast cancer-have we nally arrived? Indian J Surg 2013 Dec;75(6):419–423. doi: https://doi.
org/10.1007/s12262- 013- 1022- 1. PMID: 24465095;
PMCID: PMC3900753.
5. Van Dongen JA, Voogd AC, Fentiman IS, Legrand C, Sylvester RJ, Tong D, et al. Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy: European Organization for Research and treatment of cancer 10801 trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:1143–50. https://doi.
org/10.1093/jnci/92.14.1143.
6. Werner Audretsch MD. Commentary on: the Oncoplastic reduction approach to breast conserva­tion therapy: benets for margin control. Aesthet Surg J. 2014 November;34(8):1192–7. https://doi.org/10.1
177/1090820X14546892.
7. Clough KB, Meredith I. The Oncoplastic frenzy: beware the swing of the pendulum. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;26:3792–3. https://doi.org/10.1245/
s10434- 019- 07755- 4.
8. Maxwell J, Arnaout A, Hanrahan R, Brackstone M.Training oncoplastic breast surgeons: the Canadian fellowship experience. Curr Oncol. 2017;24(5):e394–
402. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.24.3554.
9. Piper ML, Esserman LJ, Sbitany H, Peled AW. Outcomes following oncoplastic reduc­tion mammoplasty. Ann Plast Surg. May 2016;76(Issue):S222–6.
10. Cardoso MJ, Macmillan RD, Merck B, Munhoz AM, Rainsbury R. Training in oncoplastic surgery:
an international consensus. The 7th Portuguese Senology congress, Vilamoura, 2009. Breast 2010 Dec;19(6):538–540. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
breast.2010.03.030. Epub 2010 Apr 22.
11. Urban CA.New classication for oncoplastic proce­dures in surgical practice. Breast. 2008;17(4):321–2.
12. Clough KB, Kaufman GJ, Nos C, Buccimazza I, Sarfati IM.Improving breast cancer surgery: a classi­cation and quadrant per quadrant atlas for oncoplastic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 2010 May;17(5):1375–1391. doi: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434- 009- 0792- y. Epub 2010 Feb 6.
13. Clough KB, Lewis JS, Couturaud B, Fitoussi A, Nos C, Falcou MC.Oncoplastic techniques allow exten­sive resections for breast-conserving therapy of breast carcinomas. Ann Surg. 2003;237(1):26–34.
14. Rojananin S, Lohsiriwat. International oncoplastic breast surgery training. Gland Surg. 2014;3(3):155–7.
15. Baildam A, Bishop H, Boland G, et al. On behalf of the Association of Breast Surgery at baso, the Association of Plastic Surgery at bapras, and the training Interface Group in breast surgery Oncoplastic breast surgery—a guide to good practice. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2007;33(suppl 1):S1–23. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.ejso.2007.04.014. [Erratum in: Eur J
Surg Oncol 2008;34:II]
16. Matthes AGZ, da Costa Viera RA, Augusto R, etal. The development of an Oncoplastic training center– OTC.Int J Surg. 2012;10(5):265–9.
17. Sclafani LM, Bleznak A, Kelly T, El-Tamer MB.Training a new generation of breast surgeons: are we succeeding? Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:1856–61.
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434- 011- 2164- 7.
18. Society of Surgical Oncology (sso) Rosemont, IL: SSO; SSO-Approved Breast Oncology Fellowship Training Programs [Web page] n.d. [Current version available at: http://www.surgonc.org/training- fellows/
fellows- education/breast- oncology/program- list;
cited 27 September 2016].
19. Koppiker CB, Chintamani, Dixit S. Oncoplastic breast surgery in India: Thinking Globally, Acting Locally. Indian J Surg. 2019;81:103–10. https://doi.
org/10.1007/s12262- 019- 01890- 8.
20. Koppiker CB, Noor AU, Dixit S, Busheri L, Sharan G, Dhar U, Allampati HK, Nare S.Extreme Oncoplastic surgery for multifocal/multicentric and Locally advanced breast cancer. Int J Breast Cancer 2019 Feb 20;2019:4262589. doi: https://
doi.org/10.1155/2019/4262589. PMID: 30915240;
PMCID: PMC6402217.
Workow andSurgeons Check List
https://t.me/medicina_free
forOncoplastic Breast Surgery andReconstruction
S.V.S.Deo, S.ManojGowda, andNaveenKumar
37
History: – Symptoms: Lump/Skin changes/ Nipple
discharge – Duration of symptoms – Family history of cancer/Genetic/heredity
predisposition – Personal history– Marital status/Children/
Menopausal status – Socioeconomic factors and family setup – Patient preferences/desires/expectations
Clinical Examination: – Breast anthropometry:
Breast cup size/volume Ptosis grade Clavicle to nipple length Suprasternal notch to nipple length Nipple to IMF length
– NAC
Areola diameter Nipple diameter Nipple projection
– Tumour factors:
Size of tumour Location of tumour Number: Unicentric/Multicenteric Axilla status: N0/N+
S. V. S. Deo (*) Department of Surgical Oncology, AIIMS and NCI, New Delhi, India
S. ManojGowda · N. Kumar Department of Surgical Oncology, AIIMS, New Delhi, India
Imaging: – Mammography:
Tumour size Tumour location Number
Breast density (ACR grading) – Ultrasound – MRI
Biopsy Report Evaluation – Histology -Type/Grade – Molecular subtype- ER/PR/Her2/Ki67
Surgical Planning: MDT – Surgeons provisional Plan – Patient counselling – Patients desire regarding surgical
procedure
– Final Plan:
Surgery for Primary:
• BCS/Mastectomy-MRM/RM/SSM/ NASM/SRM
• Incision– Primary/Axilla
• Closure and Reconstruction:
– Primary Closure – Type I Oncoplasty – Type II Oncoplasty – Reconstruction– Implant / Autol-
ogous Flap
– ADM/Mesh
Surgery for Axilla:
• SLNB
– Blue dye – Tc99 Radiocolloid
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2023 S. V. S. Deo (ed.), Breast Oncoplasty and Reconstruction,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5536-7_37
295
296
https://t.me/medicina_free
S. V. S. Deo et al.
– Indocyanine green – Dual technique
• ALND – Complications anticipated – Backup plan in case of intraoperative nd-
ings/complications
Documentation: – MDT- Treatment plan – Consent for surgery and for photographic
documentation
– Photographic documentation: Preoperative
pictures, intra-operative pictures and early late post-operative pictures.
Intra operative check list: – Position of the patient – Painting and draping – Photographic documentation: Before inci-
sion and after closure
– Intra-operative events/complications
– Any change in plan – Implants– Follow devise regulations – ADM/mesh – Assessment of vascularity of ap – Drain policy
Postoperative Care, MDT planning, and
Follow-up
– Wound care and Dressings – Breast support in post-operative period – Antibiotic policy – Drain removal policy – Early postoperative follow-up plan, wound
care, and suture removal – Physiotherapy – Histopathology report review – Oncology MDT– Adjuvant treatment plan – Clinical assessment and Imaging protocol – Long-term cosmetic and oncological
assessment