Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_1054_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
23 Мб
Скачать
270
https://t.me/medicina_free
S. P. Somashekhar et al.
5. Keidan RD, Hoffman JP, Weese JL, Hanks GE, Solin LJ, Eisenberg BL, et al. Delayed breast abscesses after lumpectomy and radiation therapy. Am Surg. 1990 July;56(7):440–4.
6. Berrino P, Campora E, Santi P.Post Quadrantectomy breast deformities: classication and techniques of surgical correction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1987 Apr;79(4):567–72.
7. Clough KB, Cuminet J, Fitoussi A, Nos C, Mosseri V. Cosmetic sequelae after conservative treat­ment for breast cancer: classication and results of surgical correction. Ann Plast Surg. 1998 Nov;41(5):471–81.
8. Berrino P, Campora E, Leone S, Santi P.Correction of type II breast deformities following conserva­tive cancer surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992 Nov;90(5):846–53.
9. Kronowitz SJ, Feledy JA, Hunt KK, Kuerer HM, Youssef A, Koutz CA, etal. Determining the optimal approach to breast reconstruction after partial mas­tectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006 Jan;117(1):1–11; discussion 12–14.
10. Slavin SA, Love SM, Sadowsky NL.Reconstruction of the radiated partial mastectomy defect with autogenous tissues. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992 Nov;90(5):854–865; discussion 866–869.
11. Clough KB, Lewis JS, Couturaud B, Fitoussi A, Nos C, Falcou M-C.Oncoplastic techniques allow exten­sive resections for breast-conserving therapy of breast carcinomas. Ann Surg. 2003 Jan;237(1):26–34.
12. Cothier-Savey I, Otmezguine Y, Calitchi E, Sabourin JC, Le Bourgeois JP, Baruch J. Value of reduction mammoplasty in the conservative treatment of breast neoplasms. Apropos of 70 cases. Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 1996 Aug;41(4):346–53.
13. Losken A, Schaefer TG, Newell M, Styblo TM.The impact of partial breast reconstruction using reduction techniques on postoperative cancer surveillance. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Jul;124(1):9–17.
14. Singh NK, Singh AM. Chapter 12 – Oncoplastic breast surgery and the effects of radiation therapy. In: Nahabedian MY, editor. Oncoplastic surgery of the breast [Internet]. Edinburgh: W.B. Saunders; 2009 [cited 2021 Jul 14]. p.137–48. Available from:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ B9780702031816000173
15. Slavin SA, Love SM, Sadowsky NL, Grisotti A, Veronesi U. Reconstruction of the radiated partial mastectomy defect with autogenous tissues. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992 Nov;90(5):866–7.
16. Plastic Surgery– 4th Edition (Internet). (cited 2021 Jul
14). Available from: https://www.elsevier.com/books/
plastic- surgery/nahabedian/978- 0- 323- 35709- 8
17. Hamdi M.Oncoplastic and reconstructive surgery of the breast. Breast Edinb Scotl. 2013 Aug;22(Suppl
2):S100–5.
18. Losken A, Dugal CS, Styblo TM, Carlson GW. A meta-analysis comparing breast conservation therapy alone to the oncoplastic technique. Ann Plast Surg. 2014 Feb;72(2):145–9.
19. DellaCroce FJ, Sullivan SK.Application and rene­ment of the superior gluteal artery perforator free ap for bilateral simultaneous breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005 July;116(1):97–103; discussion 104–105.
20. Chang EI, Chang EI, Soto-Miranda MA, Zhang H, Nosrati N, Robb GL, et al. Comprehensive analysis of donor-site morbidity in abdominally based free ap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Dec;132(6):1383–91.
Management Approach
https://t.me/medicina_free
toRecurrence Following Oncoplastic Breast Surgery
34
RosinaAhmed andSanjitKumarAgrawal
34.1 Introduction
The outcome of breast cancer treatment is criti­cally dependent on the extent of the disease at presentation and also on tumour biology. Ten years after treatment, between 20 and 25% of breast cancer patients will have developed recur­rent disease, either locoregional or distant [1, 2]. There are no clear parameters to accurately iden­tify which individuals will develop recurrence, and local and distant recurrences are at least par­tially independent events, with high tumour grade being an important signicant predictor for locoregional recurrence [3]. Two slightly differ­ent terms are used in this context. Ipsilateral locoregional recurrence (ILRR) includes recur­rence in the breast, axilla, supraclavicular or internal mammary lymph nodes, with some authors also including contralateral axillary lymph nodes [4]. Ipsilateral Breast Tumour Recurrence (IBTR / IBR) is recurrence within the treated breast.
The reported rate of any recurrence of breast cancer following breast conservation (BCS) with radiotherapy is around 19% at 10 years [1]. Locoregional recurrence occurs in approximately 1% of patients per year, reaching 8% at 10years, and the remainder develop metastatic recurrence. For patients who have breast conservation after
R. Ahmed (*) · S. K. Agrawal Department of Breast Oncosurgery, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, India
neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the prevalence of local recurrence is higher, at around 9.2%, but not signicantly different from patients with sim­ilar presentation who had mastectomy [5]. Local recurrence may also occur after breast conserva­tion for treatment of DCIS, and in this clinical scenario, 50% of recurrences show invasive malignancy [6]. Compared to conventional BCS, patients having oncoplastic breast surgery (OBS) are more likely to have larger or multifocal tumours. In a series of 350 patients who under­went level 2 oncoplastic breast surgery, cumula­tive 5-year local, regional, and distant recurrence was 2.2%, 1.1%, and 12.4%, respectively, at a median follow-up of 55 months [7]. A meta­analysis of studies reporting over 5years of fol­low- up after oncoplastic breast surgery found that local recurrence ranged between 1.6% and 14%, with a weighted average of 6% based on data from seven studies [8]. Survival data from the same studies showed an average disease-free survival (DFS) >85 and overall survival (OS) >93%.
Recurrence of any kind is a predictor for a poorer prognosis, with one additional breast can­cer death at 15years for every four patients who had a locoregional recurrence 10 years after breast conserving surgery [9]. As with the treat­ment of the initial breast cancer, the outcome of treatment of recurrence is related to the extent at the time of rst diagnosis, with a 5-year Distant Disease-free Survival (DDFS) of 67% in patients
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2023 S. V. S. Deo (ed.), Breast Oncoplasty and Reconstruction,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5536-7_34
271
272
https://t.me/medicina_free
R. Ahmed and S. K. Agrawal
who were node-negative at rst presentation and
51.4% in those who were node-positive. With careful evaluation and multi-disciplinary plan­ning, selected patients may be offered curative­intent treatment following isolated local recurrence, and some patients do well, with long­term survival in 50% [10].
In early breast cancer, the oncological safety of breast conservation was established with long­term follow-up from landmark trials conducted almost 40years ago [11, 12]. Volume displace­ment and volume replacement oncoplastic tech­niques have extended the application of breast conservation to tumours where previously mas­tectomy would have been the only option [7, 8]. Surgical condence with oncoplastic techniques is now quite broad based, and patients have become more accepting of treatment options and international standards. As a result, breast con­serving treatment is offered to an ever-increasing proportion of women, including those who pres­ent with larger tumours and relatively more advanced disease. In a parallel development, bet­ter understanding of tumour biology has led to the increased use of neoadjuvant systemic ther­apy in certain groups of patients, as additional post-excisional therapeutic options may be offered to patients with a poor response to che­motherapy, leading to improved oncological out­comes [13, 14]. An additional benet of this approach is that patients who initially present with large tumours and have a good response to chemotherapy may be offered the option of breast conservation with a good cosmetic outcome [5,
15]. Many of these patients having breast conser-
vation for larger tumours are offered oncoplastic procedures to improve cosmesis and symmetry. In early breast cancer the approach to the axilla is also conservative, and many patients having oncoplastic breast surgery have sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) alone. Following the results of the ACOSOG Z0011 [16] and AMAROS trials
[17], even patients with positive sentinel nodes may not undergo completion axillary surgery.
The management of patients with recurrent breast cancer is complex, and requires a multidis­ciplinary approach which takes into account each of these surgical approaches, and must also be adjusted to account for prior systemic therapy and radiotherapy. After re-staging to exclude dis­tant metastases, patients with isolated locore­gional recurrence require a comprehensive treatment plan, which may include surgery for the breast and axilla, adjuvant chemotherapy, tar­geted therapy or endocrine therapy, and re-irradiation.
The diagnosis of recurrence is very stressful for the patient and family, and support from a psycho-oncology team including specialist coun­sellors is particularly important in this situation [18]. Re-treatment also imposes an additional nancial burden on families which may already have used up much of their resources. Support to address nancial issues is also important, with advice on how to access any available resources for funding [19].
34.2 Factors Associated
withLocal Recurrence
1. Age at diagnosis – Younger patients are at
higher risk of local recurrence than older patients, with a relative risk of 2.64 at 5years, and 2.37 at 10years [20].
2. Biological subtype – Different molecular
types of breast cancer have different recur­rence patterns, with higher rates of local recurrence in patients with triple negative breast cancer and high-grade histology [4,
21]. The time to recurrence also varies with
tumour biology with a median of 6.8years for ER-positive and 3.6 years for ER-negative cancers [22].
34 Management Approach toRecurrence Following Oncoplastic Breast Surgery
https://t.me/medicina_free
273
3. Margin positivity at initial surgery – the acceptable negative excision margin for breast conservation has reduced with time, and the current standard is that there should be no ink on the tumour [23]. Patients with positive margins have a higher risk of local recurrence and are advised revision surgery as part of their primary treatment, with some series reporting re-excision in >20% of patients [24]. Margin re-excision may be challenging in patients treated with oncoplastic techniques such as therapeutic mammoplasty, which involve extensive volume displacement and reshaping of the breast. On the other hand, one of the benets of using oncoplastic tech­niques is that the excision volume is likely to be larger than for conventional BCS, with wider margins. In a meta-analysis of 3789 patients, patients having OBS had lower mar­gin positivity (RR= 0.83, CI 0.62–1.1) and re-excision (RR = 0.66, CI 0.48–0.9) com­pared to conventional BCS [25].
4. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy (NACT) – Patients treated with NACT have a higher rate of local recurrence compared to patients who have chemotherapy in the adjuvant setting, a difference of 5.5% at 15 years. The relative risk of local recurrence is 1.35 at 0–4 years and 1.5 at 5–9years post treatment, although no difference in OS was found [15].
34.3 Recurrence After Mastectomy or Breast Conservation
Isolated locoregional recurrence may follow either mastectomy or breast conservation as the primary surgical procedure, but the clinical fea­tures of recurrent disease are different in these two situations. Post-mastectomy recurrence in the chest wall is usually associated with aggres­sive tumour biology, presenting as nodules in the skin or subcutaneous tissue, or as patchy areas of redness caused by lympho-vascular emboli, and is often associated with distant metastases. Most of these patients had aggressive disease at rst presentation too, and recurrence occurs in the rst 2–3years after treatment [25, 26].
Following breast conserving surgery, IBTR is most often identied during routine surveillance mammography, although some patients identify subtle changes in the breast in the interval between mammograms. There are two distinct types. True recurrences occur in or close to the bed of the previously treated primary tumour and have similar tumour biology. This type of recur­rence is associated with positive tumour margins, aggressive tumour biology (high grade, triple negative), lympho-vascular invasion, and exten­sive DCIS (Fig. 34.1a–c). On the other hand, some recurrences occur in a different quadrant of
274
bc
https://t.me/medicina_free
R. Ahmed and S. K. Agrawal
a
Fig. 34.1 (a) Breast cancer recurrence in tumour bed (Mammogram+USG in 2017). Right breast cancer at 10 o’clock in a 32-year-old pre-menopausal woman, treated in 2015. Primary surgery – Level 1 oncoplasty through axillary skin crease incision, axillary dissection. Post-op HPE– pT2N1, IDC, G2, ER & PR positive, HER2 nega­tive, Ki-67 40%. Patient refused adjuvant chemotherapy
and radiotherapy for personal reasons. (b) IBTR in 2017– Level 2 oncoplastic breast surgery. Wide local excision + lateral intercostal artery perforator ap. HPE: rpT2, ER & PR positive, HER2 negative. Received pseudo-adjuvant chemotherapy, radiotherapy, endocrine therapy. (c) 2020– Follow-up mammogram showing healthy ap. Continuing on endocrine treatment (tamoxifen)
34 Management Approach toRecurrence Following Oncoplastic Breast Surgery
https://t.me/medicina_free
275
Fig. 34.2 Mammogram + USG showing true recurrence, away from the previous tumour bed. Treated in 2012 aged 40years– central excision + Grisotti Flap, ypT0 N0(i+), ER & PR positive HER2 equivocal. Recurred in 2019 aged 47years– medial quadrant at periphery, 9mm spicu-
the residual breast, may show a different biologi­cal type from the primary presentation, and are considered a new primary rather than recurrence of the previously treated tumour (Fig. 34.2). These recurrences may occur up to 20years after the rst treatment for breast cancer [27].
34.4 Management ofResectable Local Recurrence After Oncoplasty
For patients with both ILRR and IBTR, treatment with curative intent may be considered. The man­agement depends on the patient’s preference, age, comorbidities, and available resources, the biological subtype, and therapy received for the primary tumour. The main approach to local ther­apy is salvage surgery, with adequate surgical excision of recurrent disease in the breast, chest wall or axilla.
lated lesion, treated with salvage mastectomy, rpT1b, ER positive, PR & HER2 negative. No further chemotherapy advised, changed from tamoxifen to letrozole after oophorectomy
34.5 Surgery Following Oncoplastic Breast Conservation
For IBTR following primary BCS there is no clear contraindication to a second breast conserv­ing procedure. However, based on current strate­gies and guidelines, the most commonly preferred surgical option is still mastectomy [25, 26, 28]. Following salvage mastectomy, good long-term control may be achieved, particularly in patients with recurrence after a long disease-free interval. In patients with a rst local recurrence beyond 5years, mastectomy resulted in long term local control in 92% of patients, with a lower propor­tion, 49%, for those with recurrence in less than 5years [29]. Although many patients with local recurrence choose to have mastectomy with or without reconstruction, there is evidence that a second conservation may also give a good out­come. A systematic review and several retrospec-
276
https://t.me/medicina_free
R. Ahmed and S. K. Agrawal
tive studies reported equivalent survival outcomes for IBTR treated with a second breast conserva­tion surgery or mastectomy [30, 31]. In these studies, patients selected for second conservation generally had low-grade, good biology tumours. On the other hand, a SEER database analysis of 747 patients who had surgery for IBTR after breast conserving surgery reported better survival after salvage mastectomy compared to a second breast conservation (5-year OS 78% vs 67%, HR = 0.05, P < 0.01) [32]. Following re­conservation alone, without re-irradiation, a sec­ond recurrence has been reported in up to 33% of patients [33].
The majority of patients who have breast con­servation will have had radiotherapy as part of their primary breast cancer treatment. Although some patients with early disease may have been treated with a partial breast irradiation technique, the majority will have had whole breast radio­therapy. Following radiotherapy, breast tissue may be brosed, with compromised microvascu­lar architecture, and skin may be thickened or oedematous. Most of the available data regarding surgical complications after breast radiotherapy is related to autologous or implant-based whole breast reconstruction [34]. Implant-based recon­struction has a signicantly higher complication rate in previously irradiated patients, with some improvement if autologous tissue such as an LD ap is used in addition to the implant. Pooled data shows that the failure rate of implants after radiotherapy is about 14%, and in general this technique is not recommended. The gold stan­dard post-radiotherapy is autologous reconstruc­tion, which appears to be safe, with a ap loss rate of 3%, compared to about 1.5% in non­irradiated patients. There is very little published information on surgical techniques that should be recommended for breast re-conservation follow­ing radiotherapy. A few small case series report the outcome of cosmetic surgery such as breast reduction or mastopexy in patients who have had radiotherapy, with anecdotal evidence of increased surgical complications, including fat necrosis and wound dehiscence [35]. With this
background it is logical to avoid extensive mobi­lization of the skin or breast aps, and for re­conservation to be performed using a volume replacement technique.
Based on the available evidence, after IBTR a second breast conserving procedure may be offered judiciously, to selected patients at comprehensive cancer centres. Re-conservation may be considered for patients above 50years, with unifocal, isolated IBTR, size <2cm, and an interval of >2years between treatment of the pri­mary and recurrence. It is also important to con­sider the technical feasibility of achieving adequate oncological margins and good cosmesis with a second BCS [36].
Most of the studies on re-conservation have an inherent selection bias as they are retrospective in design. Clinical decisions must therefore be made without evidence from a randomized con­trolled study, which is in contrast to the majority of options in breast cancer management. However, with many variables in presentation and prior treatment, such a study is difcult to design.
34.6 Post-Mastectomy Recurrence
Immediate or delayed post-mastectomy recon­struction using either autologous or implant­based approaches are oncologically safe, with similar oncological outcomes following both techniques [37]. The choice of technique in the primary setting is based on the preference of the patient and surgeon, with better cosmetic out­comes following autologous reconstruction in patients who need post-mastectomy radiotherapy. For patients who develop local recurrence after autologous whole breast reconstruction, recur­rent nodules most commonly involve the native chest wall skin, sparing the ap itself and any skin harvested from the ap donor site. In patients with either autologous or implant-based recon­struction, local recurrence is usually identied by clinical examination, as routine imaging is usu­ally not advised for the reconstructed breast.
34 Management Approach toRecurrence Following Oncoplastic Breast Surgery
https://t.me/medicina_free
277
The surgical management of isolated chest wall recurrence following mastectomy is re­excision of the chest wall nodule with a negative margin. In addition, chest wall radiotherapy is recommended for patients who did not receive radiotherapy in the primary setting [28].
34.7 Management oftheAxilla
inLocoregional Recurrence
For patients with IBTR who had axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for their primary treat­ment, nodal restaging is generally not recom­mended [28], although sentinel nodes have been described in unusual draining locations such as along the internal mammary artery or in the con­tralateral axilla [4]. For patients who previously had SLNB, managing the axilla in the scenario of recurrence is more controversial. For most patients, the standard approach has been comple­tion ALND, but with advances in systemic treat­ment and diagnostic imaging, there is now some evidence that a second axillary SLNB may be possible. A systematic review and pooled analy­sis evaluated the diagnostic performance of repeat SLNB in the recurrent setting. The study reported an identication rate of 71.9%, false negative rate of 9.4% and accuracy of 97.1%, and concluded that SLNB might be a valid alternative to ALND in recurrent breast cancer without clini­cally obvious nodal recurrence [38].
Patients with or without evidence of recur­rence in the breast may develop recurrent axillary disease, in residual lymph nodes, or as tumour deposits in the fat or areolar tissue. In patients with no evidence of distant metastases, axillary recurrent disease should be resected [28]. Similarly, resection may also be considered for isolated recurrence in the supra-clavicular fossa. High nodal recurrence involving the brachial plexus is considered irresectable and should be managed as for systemic recurrence [39].
In the setting of locoregional recurrence, the role of axillary radiotherapy has not been for­mally evaluated.
34.8 Local Management ofIrresectable Local Recurrence
In patients with irresectable ILRR, systemic ther­apy may be used to downsize the disease so that surgical resection is possible. Decisions about systemic treatment must be individualized, as there is a paucity of data in this setting. Radiotherapy should be offered to patients who have not received it previously [28, 40]. Small series report the use of other palliative techniques such as cryoablation [41] or electrochemotherapy [42].
34.9 Re-irradiation
Re-irradiation in breast cancer is resource­intensive and technically challenging. It is often not recommended because of high cumulative doses and toxicity. In retrospective studies on IBTR after breast conservation, only around 25% of patients had re-irradiation [30, 31].
A small study in selected patients has shown that post mastectomy chest wall re-irradiation is possible, and may improve local control, with acceptable acute and late toxicity [43].
Following breast conservation too, re­irradiation appears to be of benet, with studies of re-conservation alone without re-irradiation reporting local recurrence in up to 33% of patients [33]. Several techniques have been described, including highly conformal 3D-CRT and partial breast irradiation using intra operative radiother­apy or brachytherapy, to minimize radiation to organs such as the heart and lungs and also the previously irradiated breast. Most of the studies which report re-irradiation use brachytherapy. Several different techniques have been used, including multi-catheter, interstitial, and High Dose Rate (HDR) techniques. The largest pub­lished series is of 217 patients treated with multi­catheter brachytherapy, reported by the GEC-ESTRO working group. In this study, the rate of 5- and 10-yearsecond LRRs was 5.6 and
278
https://t.me/medicina_free
R. Ahmed and S. K. Agrawal
7.2%, respectively, with good or excellent cos­metic outcome in 85% of patients [44].
Other possible approaches include a combina­tion of radiation with hyperthermia, which improved local control and clinical response in a prospective RCT [45], or concurrent chemora­diotherapy [46].
34.10 Systemic Recurrence
The majority of patients with recurrent breast cancer present with metastatic disease [1, 2, 9]. If the site of recurrence is accessible to clinical or guided sampling, all patients at the rst recur­rence should have a repeat biopsy to reconrm immunohistochemistry, as the biological tumour type may be different from the primary tumour [47]. Patients with extensive metastatic disease are offered second line systemic therapy alone, as further local treatment does not give additional benet [27].
Selected patients who present with a single distant site of recurrence (oligo-recurrence) may be considered for treatment under an oligometa­static protocol [48]. The principal treatment for these patients with oligometastatic recurrence is systemic, and local treatment to the metastatic site is reserved for patients with an excellent response to systemic therapy.
34.11 Systemic Therapy
ously [22, 28]. On the other hand, evidence from the CALOR trial does not support further chemo­therapy in ER-positive patients. In this trial, with a median follow-up of 9years, the hazard ratio for disease-free survival was 0.29 (95% CI, 0.13 to 0.67) in ER-negative ILRR and 1.07 (95% CI,
0.57 to 2.00) for ER-positive disease [22]. For patients with distant recurrent disease,
systemic therapy may be either endocrine based or chemotherapy, depending on the tumour type and the extent of systemic symptoms, and should follow the principles of sequential lines of ther­apy for patients with metastatic disease [28].
Continuation of endocrine therapy is recom-
mended in ER-positive recurrence. In the SAKK 23/82 trial, patients were randomized to receive tamoxifen or observation after complete excision of ER-positive ILRR and proper radiotherapy. The median post-ILRR DFS was 6.5years with tamoxifen and 2.7years with observation alone (P = 0.053) [49]. In pre-menopausal women, oophorectomy may be considered to allow a change in endocrine therapy from tamoxifen to an aromatase inhibitor [28].
In patients who have not previously received
HER2 targeted therapy, trastuzumab is indicated. However, in the setting of ILRR, the optimal strategy for HER2 targeted treatment in patients who have previously received trastuzumab is largely unknown and should follow the systemic treatment guidelines for primary therapy [28,
50].
Systemic therapy for recurrent breast cancer is based on the biological tumour type of the recur­rent lesion. Evidence for chemotherapy for patients with completely resected locoregional recurrence (‘pseudo’ adjuvant chemotherapy) comes from the CALOR trial [22]. Following complete resection, t patients with ER-negative recurrence benet from further chemotherapy. There is very little evidence regarding the exact regime which should be used, and most oncolo­gists base their decisions on the adjuvant therapy guidelines for primary treatment, with dose adjustments based on the therapy received previ-
34.12 Outcome ofTreatment
Patients with ILRR are at high risk for distant metastasis and death, despite aggressive local and systemic therapies. A retrospective review of 10 NSABP trials with 2669 node-positive and 3799 node-negative patients undergoing breast conservation surgery with or without radiation therapy found that IBTR occurred in 9% of node­negative and 9.7% of node-positive patients. The 5-year OS after treatment of IBTR was 76.6% in node-negative and 59.9% in node-positive patients. The prognosis is worse if disease recurs
34 Management Approach toRecurrence Following Oncoplastic Breast Surgery
https://t.me/medicina_free
279
in a nodal basin, with 5-year survival of 31.5% following axillary recurrence and 12.1% follow­ing supraclavicular recurrence [10, 51].
34.13 Key Learning Points
1. Management of IBTR is complex and should be done in comprehensive cancer care centres. All patients require full re-staging to rule out distant metastases. Biopsy of the recurrent lesion with repeat immunohistochemistry is advisable for all patients before treatment planning.
2. The mainstay of salvage surgery is mastec­tomy, although re-conservation surgery may be considered in a selected group of patients who recur after a longer interval, with local­ized disease where a negative margin can be achieved. A second SLNB may also be con­sidered, with the caution that the identica­tion rate may be low.
3. A multi-disciplinary approach is required, to plan systemic treatment and re-irradiation if needed. The treating team should explain all treatment options and prognosis in detail. In addition, psycho-oncological and nancial support may encourage the patient to proceed with treatment.
References
1. Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG). Effect of radiotherapy after breast­conserving surgery on 10-year recurrence and 15-year breast cancer death: meta-analysis of individual patient data for 10,801 women in 17 randomised tri­als. Lancet. 2011 Nov 12;378(9804):1707–16.
2. Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG). Increasing the dose intensity of chemo­therapy by more frequent administration or sequential scheduling : a patient-level meta-analysis of 37,298 women with early breast cancer in 26 randomised tri­als. Lancet. 2019 Apr 6;393(10179):1440–52.
3. Rausei S, Rovera F, Dionigi G, et al. Predictors of loco-regional recurrence and cancer-related death after breast cancer surgery. Breast J. Sep-Oct 2010;16(Suppl 1):S29–33.
4. Vugts G, Maaskant-Braat AJ, Voogd AC, etal. Repeat sentinel node biopsy should be considered in patients
with locally recurrent breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015;153:549–56.
5. Zhou X, Li Y. Local recurrence after breast­conserving surgery and mastectomy following neo­adjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer - a meta-analysis. Breast Care (Basel). 2016 Oct;11(5):345–51.
6. Wapnir IL, Dignam JJ, Fisher B, et al. Long-term outcomes of invasive ipsilateral breast tumor recur­rences after lumpectomy in NSABP B-17 and B-24 randomized clinical trials for DCIS. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103:478–88.
7. Clough KB, van la Parra RFD, Thygesen HH, etal. Long-term results after Oncoplastic surgery for breast cancer: a 10-year follow-up. Ann Surg. 2018 Jul;268(1):165–71.
8. de la Cruz L, Blankenship SA, Chatterjee A, et al. Outcomes after Oncoplastic breast-con­serving surgery in breast cancer patients: a sys­tematic literature review. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Oct;23(10):3247–58.
9. Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG). Effect of radiotherapy after mastectomy and axillary surgery on 10-year recurrence and 20-year breast cancer mortality : meta-analysis of individual patient data for 8135 women in 22 randomised trials. Lancet. 2014 Jun 21;383(9935):2127–35.
10. Wapnir IL, Anderson SJ, Mamounas EP, et al. Prognosis after ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence and Locoregional recurrences in ve National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and bowel project node-positive adjuvant breast cancer trials. Clin Oncol. 2006 May 1;24(13):2028–37.
11. Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, et al. Twenty­year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002 Oct 17;347(16):1227–32.
12. Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing Total mas­tectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradia­tion for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002 Oct 17;347(16):1233–41.
13. Masuda N, Lee S-J. O Shoichiro, et al. adju­vant Capecitabine for breast cancer after preop­erative chemotherapy. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun 1;376(22):2147–59.
14. von Minckwitz G, Huang C-S, Mano MS, etal. For the KATHERINE investigators. Trastuzumab Emtansine for residual invasive HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019 Feb 14;380(7):617–28.
15. Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG). Long-term outcomes for neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer: meta-analysis of individual patient data from ten ran­domised trials. Lancet Oncol. 2018 Jan;19(1):27–39.
16. Giuliano AE, Ballman KV, McCall L, et al. Effect of axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection on 10-year overall survival among women with invasive