Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_1054_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана
.pdf
270
https://t.me/medicina_free
S. P. Somashekhar et al.
5. Keidan RD, Hoffman JP, Weese JL, Hanks GE, Solin
LJ, Eisenberg BL, et al. Delayed breast abscesses
after lumpectomy and radiation therapy. Am Surg.
1990 July;56(7):440–4.
6. Berrino P, Campora E, Santi P.Post Quadrantectomy
breast deformities: classication and techniques
of surgical correction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1987
Apr;79(4):567–72.
7. Clough KB, Cuminet J, Fitoussi A, Nos C, Mosseri
V. Cosmetic sequelae after conservative treatment for breast cancer: classication and results
of surgical correction. Ann Plast Surg. 1998
Nov;41(5):471–81.
8. Berrino P, Campora E, Leone S, Santi P.Correction
of type II breast deformities following conservative cancer surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992
Nov;90(5):846–53.
9. Kronowitz SJ, Feledy JA, Hunt KK, Kuerer HM,
Youssef A, Koutz CA, etal. Determining the optimal
approach to breast reconstruction after partial mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006 Jan;117(1):1–11;
discussion 12–14.
10. Slavin SA, Love SM, Sadowsky NL.Reconstruction
of the radiated partial mastectomy defect with
autogenous tissues. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992
Nov;90(5):854–865; discussion 866–869.
11. Clough KB, Lewis JS, Couturaud B, Fitoussi A, Nos
C, Falcou M-C.Oncoplastic techniques allow extensive resections for breast-conserving therapy of breast
carcinomas. Ann Surg. 2003 Jan;237(1):26–34.
12. Cothier-Savey I, Otmezguine Y, Calitchi E, Sabourin
JC, Le Bourgeois JP, Baruch J. Value of reduction
mammoplasty in the conservative treatment of breast
neoplasms. Apropos of 70 cases. Ann Chir Plast
Esthet. 1996 Aug;41(4):346–53.
13. Losken A, Schaefer TG, Newell M, Styblo TM.The
impact of partial breast reconstruction using reduction
techniques on postoperative cancer surveillance. Plast
Reconstr Surg. 2009 Jul;124(1):9–17.
14. Singh NK, Singh AM. Chapter 12 – Oncoplastic
breast surgery and the effects of radiation therapy.
In: Nahabedian MY, editor. Oncoplastic surgery of
the breast [Internet]. Edinburgh: W.B. Saunders;
2009 [cited 2021 Jul 14]. p.137–48. Available from:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/
B9780702031816000173
15. Slavin SA, Love SM, Sadowsky NL, Grisotti A,
Veronesi U. Reconstruction of the radiated partial
mastectomy defect with autogenous tissues. Plast
Reconstr Surg. 1992 Nov;90(5):866–7.
16. Plastic Surgery– 4th Edition (Internet). (cited 2021 Jul
14). Available from: https://www.elsevier.com/books/
plastic- surgery/nahabedian/978- 0- 323- 35709- 8
17. Hamdi M.Oncoplastic and reconstructive surgery of
the breast. Breast Edinb Scotl. 2013 Aug;22(Suppl
2):S100–5.
18. Losken A, Dugal CS, Styblo TM, Carlson GW. A
meta-analysis comparing breast conservation therapy
alone to the oncoplastic technique. Ann Plast Surg.
2014 Feb;72(2):145–9.
19. DellaCroce FJ, Sullivan SK.Application and renement of the superior gluteal artery perforator free ap
for bilateral simultaneous breast reconstruction. Plast
Reconstr Surg 2005 July;116(1):97–103; discussion
104–105.
20. Chang EI, Chang EI, Soto-Miranda MA, Zhang H,
Nosrati N, Robb GL, et al. Comprehensive analysis
of donor-site morbidity in abdominally based free
ap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013
Dec;132(6):1383–91.

Management Approach
https://t.me/medicina_free
toRecurrence Following
Oncoplastic Breast Surgery
34
RosinaAhmed andSanjitKumarAgrawal
34.1 Introduction
The outcome of breast cancer treatment is critically dependent on the extent of the disease at
presentation and also on tumour biology. Ten
years after treatment, between 20 and 25% of
breast cancer patients will have developed recurrent disease, either locoregional or distant [1, 2].
There are no clear parameters to accurately identify which individuals will develop recurrence,
and local and distant recurrences are at least partially independent events, with high tumour grade
being an important signicant predictor for
locoregional recurrence [3]. Two slightly different terms are used in this context. Ipsilateral
locoregional recurrence (ILRR) includes recurrence in the breast, axilla, supraclavicular or
internal mammary lymph nodes, with some
authors also including contralateral axillary
lymph nodes [4]. Ipsilateral Breast Tumour
Recurrence (IBTR / IBR) is recurrence within the
treated breast.
The reported rate of any recurrence of breast
cancer following breast conservation (BCS) with
radiotherapy is around 19% at 10 years [1].
Locoregional recurrence occurs in approximately
1% of patients per year, reaching 8% at 10years,
and the remainder develop metastatic recurrence.
For patients who have breast conservation after
R. Ahmed (*) · S. K. Agrawal
Department of Breast Oncosurgery, Tata Medical
Center, Kolkata, India
neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the prevalence of
local recurrence is higher, at around 9.2%, but
not signicantly different from patients with similar presentation who had mastectomy [5]. Local
recurrence may also occur after breast conservation for treatment of DCIS, and in this clinical
scenario, 50% of recurrences show invasive
malignancy [6]. Compared to conventional BCS,
patients having oncoplastic breast surgery (OBS)
are more likely to have larger or multifocal
tumours. In a series of 350 patients who underwent level 2 oncoplastic breast surgery, cumulative 5-year local, regional, and distant recurrence
was 2.2%, 1.1%, and 12.4%, respectively, at a
median follow-up of 55 months [7]. A metaanalysis of studies reporting over 5years of follow- up after oncoplastic breast surgery found
that local recurrence ranged between 1.6% and
14%, with a weighted average of 6% based on
data from seven studies [8]. Survival data from
the same studies showed an average disease-free
survival (DFS) >85 and overall survival (OS)
>93%.
Recurrence of any kind is a predictor for a
poorer prognosis, with one additional breast cancer death at 15years for every four patients who
had a locoregional recurrence 10 years after
breast conserving surgery [9]. As with the treatment of the initial breast cancer, the outcome of
treatment of recurrence is related to the extent at
the time of rst diagnosis, with a 5-year Distant
Disease-free Survival (DDFS) of 67% in patients
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2023
S. V. S. Deo (ed.), Breast Oncoplasty and Reconstruction,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5536-7_34
271

272
https://t.me/medicina_free
R. Ahmed and S. K. Agrawal
who were node-negative at rst presentation and
51.4% in those who were node-positive. With
careful evaluation and multi-disciplinary planning, selected patients may be offered curativeintent treatment following isolated local
recurrence, and some patients do well, with longterm survival in 50% [10].
In early breast cancer, the oncological safety
of breast conservation was established with longterm follow-up from landmark trials conducted
almost 40years ago [11, 12]. Volume displacement and volume replacement oncoplastic techniques have extended the application of breast
conservation to tumours where previously mastectomy would have been the only option [7, 8].
Surgical condence with oncoplastic techniques
is now quite broad based, and patients have
become more accepting of treatment options and
international standards. As a result, breast conserving treatment is offered to an ever-increasing
proportion of women, including those who present with larger tumours and relatively more
advanced disease. In a parallel development, better understanding of tumour biology has led to
the increased use of neoadjuvant systemic therapy in certain groups of patients, as additional
post-excisional therapeutic options may be
offered to patients with a poor response to chemotherapy, leading to improved oncological outcomes [13, 14]. An additional benet of this
approach is that patients who initially present
with large tumours and have a good response to
chemotherapy may be offered the option of breast
conservation with a good cosmetic outcome [5,
15]. Many of these patients having breast conser-
vation for larger tumours are offered oncoplastic
procedures to improve cosmesis and symmetry.
In early breast cancer the approach to the axilla is
also conservative, and many patients having
oncoplastic breast surgery have sentinel lymph
node biopsy (SLNB) alone. Following the results
of the ACOSOG Z0011 [16] and AMAROS trials
[17], even patients with positive sentinel nodes
may not undergo completion axillary surgery.
The management of patients with recurrent
breast cancer is complex, and requires a multidisciplinary approach which takes into account each
of these surgical approaches, and must also be
adjusted to account for prior systemic therapy
and radiotherapy. After re-staging to exclude distant metastases, patients with isolated locoregional recurrence require a comprehensive
treatment plan, which may include surgery for
the breast and axilla, adjuvant chemotherapy, targeted therapy or endocrine therapy, and
re-irradiation.
The diagnosis of recurrence is very stressful
for the patient and family, and support from a
psycho-oncology team including specialist counsellors is particularly important in this situation
[18]. Re-treatment also imposes an additional
nancial burden on families which may already
have used up much of their resources. Support to
address nancial issues is also important, with
advice on how to access any available resources
for funding [19].
34.2 Factors Associated
withLocal Recurrence
1. Age at diagnosis – Younger patients are at
higher risk of local recurrence than older
patients, with a relative risk of 2.64 at 5years,
and 2.37 at 10years [20].
2. Biological subtype – Different molecular
types of breast cancer have different recurrence patterns, with higher rates of local
recurrence in patients with triple negative
breast cancer and high-grade histology [4,
21]. The time to recurrence also varies with
tumour biology with a median of 6.8years for
ER-positive and 3.6 years for ER-negative
cancers [22].

34 Management Approach toRecurrence Following Oncoplastic Breast Surgery
https://t.me/medicina_free
273
3. Margin positivity at initial surgery – the
acceptable negative excision margin for breast
conservation has reduced with time, and the
current standard is that there should be no ink
on the tumour [23]. Patients with positive
margins have a higher risk of local recurrence
and are advised revision surgery as part of
their primary treatment, with some series
reporting re-excision in >20% of patients
[24]. Margin re-excision may be challenging
in patients treated with oncoplastic techniques
such as therapeutic mammoplasty, which
involve extensive volume displacement and
reshaping of the breast. On the other hand,
one of the benets of using oncoplastic techniques is that the excision volume is likely to
be larger than for conventional BCS, with
wider margins. In a meta-analysis of 3789
patients, patients having OBS had lower margin positivity (RR= 0.83, CI 0.62–1.1) and
re-excision (RR = 0.66, CI 0.48–0.9) compared to conventional BCS [25].
4. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy (NACT) –
Patients treated with NACT have a higher rate
of local recurrence compared to patients who
have chemotherapy in the adjuvant setting, a
difference of 5.5% at 15 years. The relative
risk of local recurrence is 1.35 at 0–4 years
and 1.5 at 5–9years post treatment, although
no difference in OS was found [15].
34.3 Recurrence After
Mastectomy or Breast
Conservation
Isolated locoregional recurrence may follow
either mastectomy or breast conservation as the
primary surgical procedure, but the clinical features of recurrent disease are different in these
two situations. Post-mastectomy recurrence in
the chest wall is usually associated with aggressive tumour biology, presenting as nodules in the
skin or subcutaneous tissue, or as patchy areas of
redness caused by lympho-vascular emboli, and
is often associated with distant metastases. Most
of these patients had aggressive disease at rst
presentation too, and recurrence occurs in the
rst 2–3years after treatment [25, 26].
Following breast conserving surgery, IBTR is
most often identied during routine surveillance
mammography, although some patients identify
subtle changes in the breast in the interval
between mammograms. There are two distinct
types. True recurrences occur in or close to the
bed of the previously treated primary tumour and
have similar tumour biology. This type of recurrence is associated with positive tumour margins,
aggressive tumour biology (high grade, triple
negative), lympho-vascular invasion, and extensive DCIS (Fig. 34.1a–c). On the other hand,
some recurrences occur in a different quadrant of

274
bc
https://t.me/medicina_free
R. Ahmed and S. K. Agrawal
a
Fig. 34.1 (a) Breast cancer recurrence in tumour bed
(Mammogram+USG in 2017). Right breast cancer at 10
o’clock in a 32-year-old pre-menopausal woman, treated
in 2015. Primary surgery – Level 1 oncoplasty through
axillary skin crease incision, axillary dissection. Post-op
HPE– pT2N1, IDC, G2, ER & PR positive, HER2 negative, Ki-67 40%. Patient refused adjuvant chemotherapy
and radiotherapy for personal reasons. (b) IBTR in 2017–
Level 2 oncoplastic breast surgery. Wide local excision +
lateral intercostal artery perforator ap. HPE: rpT2, ER &
PR positive, HER2 negative. Received pseudo-adjuvant
chemotherapy, radiotherapy, endocrine therapy. (c) 2020–
Follow-up mammogram showing healthy ap. Continuing
on endocrine treatment (tamoxifen)

34 Management Approach toRecurrence Following Oncoplastic Breast Surgery
https://t.me/medicina_free
275
Fig. 34.2 Mammogram + USG showing true recurrence,
away from the previous tumour bed. Treated in 2012 aged
40years– central excision + Grisotti Flap, ypT0 N0(i+),
ER & PR positive HER2 equivocal. Recurred in 2019
aged 47years– medial quadrant at periphery, 9mm spicu-
the residual breast, may show a different biological type from the primary presentation, and are
considered a new primary rather than recurrence
of the previously treated tumour (Fig. 34.2).
These recurrences may occur up to 20years after
the rst treatment for breast cancer [27].
34.4 Management ofResectable
Local Recurrence After
Oncoplasty
For patients with both ILRR and IBTR, treatment
with curative intent may be considered. The management depends on the patient’s preference,
age, comorbidities, and available resources, the
biological subtype, and therapy received for the
primary tumour. The main approach to local therapy is salvage surgery, with adequate surgical
excision of recurrent disease in the breast, chest
wall or axilla.
lated lesion, treated with salvage mastectomy, rpT1b, ER
positive, PR & HER2 negative. No further chemotherapy
advised, changed from tamoxifen to letrozole after
oophorectomy
34.5 Surgery Following
Oncoplastic Breast
Conservation
For IBTR following primary BCS there is no
clear contraindication to a second breast conserving procedure. However, based on current strategies and guidelines, the most commonly preferred
surgical option is still mastectomy [25, 26, 28].
Following salvage mastectomy, good long-term
control may be achieved, particularly in patients
with recurrence after a long disease-free interval.
In patients with a rst local recurrence beyond
5years, mastectomy resulted in long term local
control in 92% of patients, with a lower proportion, 49%, for those with recurrence in less than
5years [29]. Although many patients with local
recurrence choose to have mastectomy with or
without reconstruction, there is evidence that a
second conservation may also give a good outcome. A systematic review and several retrospec-

276
https://t.me/medicina_free
R. Ahmed and S. K. Agrawal
tive studies reported equivalent survival outcomes
for IBTR treated with a second breast conservation surgery or mastectomy [30, 31]. In these
studies, patients selected for second conservation
generally had low-grade, good biology tumours.
On the other hand, a SEER database analysis of
747 patients who had surgery for IBTR after
breast conserving surgery reported better survival
after salvage mastectomy compared to a second
breast conservation (5-year OS 78% vs 67%,
HR = 0.05, P < 0.01) [32]. Following reconservation alone, without re-irradiation, a second recurrence has been reported in up to 33% of
patients [33].
The majority of patients who have breast conservation will have had radiotherapy as part of
their primary breast cancer treatment. Although
some patients with early disease may have been
treated with a partial breast irradiation technique,
the majority will have had whole breast radiotherapy. Following radiotherapy, breast tissue
may be brosed, with compromised microvascular architecture, and skin may be thickened or
oedematous. Most of the available data regarding
surgical complications after breast radiotherapy
is related to autologous or implant-based whole
breast reconstruction [34]. Implant-based reconstruction has a signicantly higher complication
rate in previously irradiated patients, with some
improvement if autologous tissue such as an LD
ap is used in addition to the implant. Pooled
data shows that the failure rate of implants after
radiotherapy is about 14%, and in general this
technique is not recommended. The gold standard post-radiotherapy is autologous reconstruction, which appears to be safe, with a ap loss
rate of 3%, compared to about 1.5% in nonirradiated patients. There is very little published
information on surgical techniques that should be
recommended for breast re-conservation following radiotherapy. A few small case series report
the outcome of cosmetic surgery such as breast
reduction or mastopexy in patients who have had
radiotherapy, with anecdotal evidence of
increased surgical complications, including fat
necrosis and wound dehiscence [35]. With this
background it is logical to avoid extensive mobilization of the skin or breast aps, and for reconservation to be performed using a volume
replacement technique.
Based on the available evidence, after IBTR a
second breast conserving procedure may be
offered judiciously, to selected patients at
comprehensive cancer centres. Re-conservation
may be considered for patients above 50years,
with unifocal, isolated IBTR, size <2cm, and an
interval of >2years between treatment of the primary and recurrence. It is also important to consider the technical feasibility of achieving
adequate oncological margins and good cosmesis
with a second BCS [36].
Most of the studies on re-conservation have an
inherent selection bias as they are retrospective in
design. Clinical decisions must therefore be
made without evidence from a randomized controlled study, which is in contrast to the majority
of options in breast cancer management.
However, with many variables in presentation
and prior treatment, such a study is difcult to
design.
34.6 Post-Mastectomy Recurrence
Immediate or delayed post-mastectomy reconstruction using either autologous or implantbased approaches are oncologically safe, with
similar oncological outcomes following both
techniques [37]. The choice of technique in the
primary setting is based on the preference of the
patient and surgeon, with better cosmetic outcomes following autologous reconstruction in
patients who need post-mastectomy radiotherapy.
For patients who develop local recurrence after
autologous whole breast reconstruction, recurrent nodules most commonly involve the native
chest wall skin, sparing the ap itself and any
skin harvested from the ap donor site. In patients
with either autologous or implant-based reconstruction, local recurrence is usually identied by
clinical examination, as routine imaging is usually not advised for the reconstructed breast.

34 Management Approach toRecurrence Following Oncoplastic Breast Surgery
https://t.me/medicina_free
277
The surgical management of isolated chest
wall recurrence following mastectomy is reexcision of the chest wall nodule with a negative
margin. In addition, chest wall radiotherapy is
recommended for patients who did not receive
radiotherapy in the primary setting [28].
34.7 Management oftheAxilla
inLocoregional Recurrence
For patients with IBTR who had axillary lymph
node dissection (ALND) for their primary treatment, nodal restaging is generally not recommended [28], although sentinel nodes have been
described in unusual draining locations such as
along the internal mammary artery or in the contralateral axilla [4]. For patients who previously
had SLNB, managing the axilla in the scenario of
recurrence is more controversial. For most
patients, the standard approach has been completion ALND, but with advances in systemic treatment and diagnostic imaging, there is now some
evidence that a second axillary SLNB may be
possible. A systematic review and pooled analysis evaluated the diagnostic performance of
repeat SLNB in the recurrent setting. The study
reported an identication rate of 71.9%, false
negative rate of 9.4% and accuracy of 97.1%, and
concluded that SLNB might be a valid alternative
to ALND in recurrent breast cancer without clinically obvious nodal recurrence [38].
Patients with or without evidence of recurrence in the breast may develop recurrent axillary
disease, in residual lymph nodes, or as tumour
deposits in the fat or areolar tissue. In patients
with no evidence of distant metastases, axillary
recurrent disease should be resected [28].
Similarly, resection may also be considered for
isolated recurrence in the supra-clavicular fossa.
High nodal recurrence involving the brachial
plexus is considered irresectable and should be
managed as for systemic recurrence [39].
In the setting of locoregional recurrence, the
role of axillary radiotherapy has not been formally evaluated.
34.8 Local Management
ofIrresectable Local
Recurrence
In patients with irresectable ILRR, systemic therapy may be used to downsize the disease so that
surgical resection is possible. Decisions about
systemic treatment must be individualized, as
there is a paucity of data in this setting.
Radiotherapy should be offered to patients who
have not received it previously [28, 40]. Small
series report the use of other palliative techniques
such as cryoablation [41] or electrochemotherapy
[42].
34.9 Re-irradiation
Re-irradiation in breast cancer is resourceintensive and technically challenging. It is often
not recommended because of high cumulative
doses and toxicity. In retrospective studies on
IBTR after breast conservation, only around 25%
of patients had re-irradiation [30, 31].
A small study in selected patients has shown
that post mastectomy chest wall re-irradiation is
possible, and may improve local control, with
acceptable acute and late toxicity [43].
Following breast conservation too, reirradiation appears to be of benet, with studies
of re-conservation alone without re-irradiation
reporting local recurrence in up to 33% of patients
[33]. Several techniques have been described,
including highly conformal 3D-CRT and partial
breast irradiation using intra operative radiotherapy or brachytherapy, to minimize radiation to
organs such as the heart and lungs and also the
previously irradiated breast. Most of the studies
which report re-irradiation use brachytherapy.
Several different techniques have been used,
including multi-catheter, interstitial, and High
Dose Rate (HDR) techniques. The largest published series is of 217 patients treated with multicatheter brachytherapy, reported by the
GEC-ESTRO working group. In this study, the
rate of 5- and 10-yearsecond LRRs was 5.6 and

278
https://t.me/medicina_free
R. Ahmed and S. K. Agrawal
7.2%, respectively, with good or excellent cosmetic outcome in 85% of patients [44].
Other possible approaches include a combination of radiation with hyperthermia, which
improved local control and clinical response in a
prospective RCT [45], or concurrent chemoradiotherapy [46].
34.10 Systemic Recurrence
The majority of patients with recurrent breast
cancer present with metastatic disease [1, 2, 9]. If
the site of recurrence is accessible to clinical or
guided sampling, all patients at the rst recurrence should have a repeat biopsy to reconrm
immunohistochemistry, as the biological tumour
type may be different from the primary tumour
[47]. Patients with extensive metastatic disease
are offered second line systemic therapy alone, as
further local treatment does not give additional
benet [27].
Selected patients who present with a single
distant site of recurrence (oligo-recurrence) may
be considered for treatment under an oligometastatic protocol [48]. The principal treatment for
these patients with oligometastatic recurrence is
systemic, and local treatment to the metastatic
site is reserved for patients with an excellent
response to systemic therapy.
34.11 Systemic Therapy
ously [22, 28]. On the other hand, evidence from
the CALOR trial does not support further chemotherapy in ER-positive patients. In this trial, with
a median follow-up of 9years, the hazard ratio
for disease-free survival was 0.29 (95% CI, 0.13
to 0.67) in ER-negative ILRR and 1.07 (95% CI,
0.57 to 2.00) for ER-positive disease [22].
For patients with distant recurrent disease,
systemic therapy may be either endocrine based
or chemotherapy, depending on the tumour type
and the extent of systemic symptoms, and should
follow the principles of sequential lines of therapy for patients with metastatic disease [28].
Continuation of endocrine therapy is recom-
mended in ER-positive recurrence. In the SAKK
23/82 trial, patients were randomized to receive
tamoxifen or observation after complete excision
of ER-positive ILRR and proper radiotherapy.
The median post-ILRR DFS was 6.5years with
tamoxifen and 2.7years with observation alone
(P = 0.053) [49]. In pre-menopausal women,
oophorectomy may be considered to allow a
change in endocrine therapy from tamoxifen to
an aromatase inhibitor [28].
In patients who have not previously received
HER2 targeted therapy, trastuzumab is indicated.
However, in the setting of ILRR, the optimal
strategy for HER2 targeted treatment in patients
who have previously received trastuzumab is
largely unknown and should follow the systemic
treatment guidelines for primary therapy [28,
50].
Systemic therapy for recurrent breast cancer is
based on the biological tumour type of the recurrent lesion. Evidence for chemotherapy for
patients with completely resected locoregional
recurrence (‘pseudo’ adjuvant chemotherapy)
comes from the CALOR trial [22]. Following
complete resection, t patients with ER-negative
recurrence benet from further chemotherapy.
There is very little evidence regarding the exact
regime which should be used, and most oncologists base their decisions on the adjuvant therapy
guidelines for primary treatment, with dose
adjustments based on the therapy received previ-
34.12 Outcome ofTreatment
Patients with ILRR are at high risk for distant
metastasis and death, despite aggressive local
and systemic therapies. A retrospective review of
10 NSABP trials with 2669 node-positive and
3799 node-negative patients undergoing breast
conservation surgery with or without radiation
therapy found that IBTR occurred in 9% of nodenegative and 9.7% of node-positive patients. The
5-year OS after treatment of IBTR was 76.6% in
node-negative and 59.9% in node-positive
patients. The prognosis is worse if disease recurs

34 Management Approach toRecurrence Following Oncoplastic Breast Surgery
https://t.me/medicina_free
279
in a nodal basin, with 5-year survival of 31.5%
following axillary recurrence and 12.1% following supraclavicular recurrence [10, 51].
34.13 Key Learning Points
1. Management of IBTR is complex and should
be done in comprehensive cancer care centres.
All patients require full re-staging to rule out
distant metastases. Biopsy of the recurrent
lesion with repeat immunohistochemistry is
advisable for all patients before treatment
planning.
2. The mainstay of salvage surgery is mastectomy, although re-conservation surgery may
be considered in a selected group of patients
who recur after a longer interval, with localized disease where a negative margin can be
achieved. A second SLNB may also be considered, with the caution that the identication rate may be low.
3. A multi-disciplinary approach is required, to
plan systemic treatment and re-irradiation if
needed. The treating team should explain all
treatment options and prognosis in detail. In
addition, psycho-oncological and nancial
support may encourage the patient to proceed
with treatment.
References
1. Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group
(EBCTCG). Effect of radiotherapy after breastconserving surgery on 10-year recurrence and 15-year
breast cancer death: meta-analysis of individual
patient data for 10,801 women in 17 randomised trials. Lancet. 2011 Nov 12;378(9804):1707–16.
2. Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group
(EBCTCG). Increasing the dose intensity of chemotherapy by more frequent administration or sequential
scheduling : a patient-level meta-analysis of 37,298
women with early breast cancer in 26 randomised trials. Lancet. 2019 Apr 6;393(10179):1440–52.
3. Rausei S, Rovera F, Dionigi G, et al. Predictors
of loco-regional recurrence and cancer-related
death after breast cancer surgery. Breast J. Sep-Oct
2010;16(Suppl 1):S29–33.
4. Vugts G, Maaskant-Braat AJ, Voogd AC, etal. Repeat
sentinel node biopsy should be considered in patients
with locally recurrent breast cancer. Breast Cancer
Res Treat. 2015;153:549–56.
5. Zhou X, Li Y. Local recurrence after breastconserving surgery and mastectomy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced breast
cancer - a meta-analysis. Breast Care (Basel). 2016
Oct;11(5):345–51.
6. Wapnir IL, Dignam JJ, Fisher B, et al. Long-term
outcomes of invasive ipsilateral breast tumor recurrences after lumpectomy in NSABP B-17 and B-24
randomized clinical trials for DCIS. J Natl Cancer
Inst. 2011;103:478–88.
7. Clough KB, van la Parra RFD, Thygesen HH, etal.
Long-term results after Oncoplastic surgery for
breast cancer: a 10-year follow-up. Ann Surg. 2018
Jul;268(1):165–71.
8. de la Cruz L, Blankenship SA, Chatterjee A,
et al. Outcomes after Oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery in breast cancer patients: a systematic literature review. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016
Oct;23(10):3247–58.
9. Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group
(EBCTCG). Effect of radiotherapy after mastectomy
and axillary surgery on 10-year recurrence and 20-year
breast cancer mortality : meta-analysis of individual
patient data for 8135 women in 22 randomised trials.
Lancet. 2014 Jun 21;383(9935):2127–35.
10. Wapnir IL, Anderson SJ, Mamounas EP, et al.
Prognosis after ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence and
Locoregional recurrences in ve National Surgical
Adjuvant Breast and bowel project node-positive
adjuvant breast cancer trials. Clin Oncol. 2006 May
1;24(13):2028–37.
11. Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, et al. Twentyyear follow-up of a randomized study comparing
breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy
for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002 Oct
17;347(16):1227–32.
12. Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty-year
follow-up of a randomized trial comparing Total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl
J Med. 2002 Oct 17;347(16):1233–41.
13. Masuda N, Lee S-J. O Shoichiro, et al. adjuvant Capecitabine for breast cancer after preoperative chemotherapy. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun
1;376(22):2147–59.
14. von Minckwitz G, Huang C-S, Mano MS, etal. For the
KATHERINE investigators. Trastuzumab Emtansine
for residual invasive HER2-positive breast cancer. N
Engl J Med. 2019 Feb 14;380(7):617–28.
15. Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group
(EBCTCG). Long-term outcomes for neoadjuvant
versus adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer:
meta-analysis of individual patient data from ten randomised trials. Lancet Oncol. 2018 Jan;19(1):27–39.
16. Giuliano AE, Ballman KV, McCall L, et al. Effect
of axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection on
10-year overall survival among women with invasive
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
