Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_4547_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана
.pdf
182 D. Farneti
https://t.me/med1917
opening or early closure thereof (hypercompetence or
hyperfunction). The insertion of the cricopharyngeal
muscle into the cricoid cartilage determines, in the
case of hypercontraction, an antagonism of the closing mechanisms of the laryngeal cavity, by reducing
or preventing adequate facing of the arytenoids with
respect to the epiglottis, thereby creating a predisposition to penetration episodes in the place of free
inhalation. In 1,370 dysphonic patients, a high incidence of penetration (1,100 patients) was observed by
Wuttge-Hannig and Hannig (2009) and was explained
by the authors as a result of such an indirect mechanism. Posture can also differentiate patients with
laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR): in the standing
position, and therefore while awake, the patients may
experience reflux episodes during the day (Kouffman
et al. 2000).
Some patients with LPR report reflux episodes
only when they sing. In relation to what was stated
above, we can add that patients with LPR also complain of motility disorders resulting in a delayed acid
clearance or affecting the upper oesophageal sphincter
with an increase in the basal pressure (Fouand et al.
1998). The experimental instillation of acid in the
distal oesophagus of patients with LPR and in controls determines an increase in the tone of the upper
oesophageal sphincter (Gerhardt et al. 1978).
4.1.2 Physiological Influences
In addition to the aforementioned influencing characteristics, singers often have dietary habits that
promote reflux, with late dinners after evening performances and going to bed immediately after eating.
Furthermore, the stress that is often part of the singer’s career should also be taken into consideration.
Oesophageal motility disorders or other reflux-related
conditions (increased acid secretion, transient reduction in lower oesophageal sphincter pressure directly
elicited by pharyngeal acid stimulation, decreased
threshold of reflex gastric distension) have been
described in psychophysical stress conditions (Castell
1999). The need to maintain their voices at optimal
performance levels pushes these vocal professionals
to take drugs or self-medication that may even worsen
subjective or perceptive voice symptoms. Also the
impact of an incorrect or inadequate diet on the
genesis or maintenance of the reflux disease should
not be neglected.
The most evident anatomical alterations of the
laryngeal structures are caused by a direct contact
with acid or alkaline juices and by the action of
enzymes contained therein. In addition to erythema or
oedema, a hacking cough can cause bleeding or
mucosal tears responsible for obliteration of the
lamina propria and the formation of adherences of
mucosa to the vocal ligament. The inefficiency of the
laryngeal vibrator associated with the decreased
respiratory performance (potentially mediated by the
aspiration of the refluxate into the lower airways)
triggers vocal abuse and effort circuits that may lead
to the onset of nodules or other lesions of the epithelial lining of vocal folds (Sataloff 1993; Spiegel
et al. 1988).
5 Common Pathological Events
If the anatomical aspects are integrated into the various functions, such integration also characterizes
pathological events that may affect effectors with a
consequent impact on related functions (Fig. 1): in
consideration of the high integration of these functions, dysfunctions may therefore be due to noxae
localized at various levels and differently influenced
by various pathological events.
Diseases related to voice and swallowing disorders
may therefore be due to lesions of the nervous system
in all of its components, autoimmune/dysreactive and
iatrogenic (surgical operations, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, interaction of drugs) diseases as well as nonorganic ones, if not overtly psychic or psychiatric
components, which may sometimes explain certain
clinical pictures. Table 1 briefly summarizes the
events underlying voice production, whereas Table 2
illustrates the pathogenetic events that may affect it.
5.1 Vocal Alterations
Dysphonia is defined as a disorder characterized by
altered vocal quality, pitch, loudness, or vocal effort
that impairs communication or reduces voice-related
quality of life (Schwartz et al. 2009). Voice disorders
may be differently classified. In the literature there
exist only a few works on the topic (Milutinovic
1966; Rosen and Murry 2000), but the most recent
orientations identify two main categories: organic

Voice and Dysphagia 183
https://t.me/med1917
Table 1 Events related to voice production
Site Events
CNS Planning, activation, control
PNS Transfer of information
Thoracic bellows Volume, pressures, flows
Larynx Energy vibration: longitudinal and vertical direction
Vocal tract Energy distribution in the speech spectrum
CNS central nervous system, PNS peripheral nervous system
Table 2 Pathophysiological events in voice disorders
Pathophysiological events Site
Lack of planning, activation, control CNS
Information transfer from centres to effectors PNS, lack of motility, sensation
Breathing disorders (volumes, pressure, flows) Thoracic bellows
Glottic insufficiency Larynx, CNS, PNS
Vibratory alterations of the mucosa (qualitative and quantitative) Larynx
Pathological posture of intrinsic and/or extrinsic laryngeal muscles CNS, bellows, larynx, vocal tract
Breath–phonation incoordination CNS, bellows, larynx
Phonation–resonance incoordination Larynx, vocal tract
Incorrect posture Posture, respiratory function
Table 3 Organic dysphonia
Thoracic bellows Restrictive, obstructive, mixed lung disease
Laryngitis Acute, chronic nonspecific and specific
Glottic plan
alterations
After surgery Laryngeal structures (epithelium, muscles, framework)
Dysmobility Ankylosis, peripheral nerves injury
Neurological
disorders
Muscle disease Myasthenia, dystrophies, dermatomyositis, myofibromatosis, muscle tumours, intrachordal haematoma
Drugs Testosterone, steroids, antihistamines, spasmolytics, atropine, drugs, high doses of vitamin C, diuretics
Hormonal disorders Dysthyroidism, premenstrual hyperoestrogenism, dysmenorrhoea, pregnancy, menopause, andropause,
Thesaurismosis Amyloid, lipids, mucopolysaccharides
Pitch alterations Primary (change of sex, androphonia), secondary
Vocal tract
alterations
dysphonia (Table 3) (Blitzer et al. 1992; Bouchayer
et al. 1985; Sataloff 1997; Schindler 1980; Segre
1976; Ursino 1995) and non-organic (dysfunctional or
muscle tension) dysphonia (Table 4), characterized
by structural or functional changes in the organs
Epithelium and lamina propria, arytenoid mucosa, anterior commissure
Cortical, subcortical, cerebellar, peripheral nerve pathways
hyperpituitarism, hypogonadism/hyperoestrogenism in prepubertal males and hyperandrogenism in
prepubertal females, diabetes
Nasality, volume resonators, feature walls
involved in voice production (Aronson 1980; Remacle
and Lawson 1994; Sataloff 1997).
The interaction between form and structure
(Fig. 1) explains the rich variety of related symptoms
(dysphonia syndrome), including acoustic signs

184 D. Farneti
https://t.me/med1917
Table 4 Non-organic (dysfunctional or muscle tension) dysphonia
Primary Overuse, misuse, difficulties in pitch discrimination, imitation of incongruous vocal models
Secondary psychogenic Conversion disorder, vocal cord dysfunction, disorders of the voice moult, pathological anxiety,
Secondary to organic
disease
Table 5 Conditions related to the onset of oropharyngeal dysphagia
Iatrogenic medication side effects (chemotherapy, neuroleptics, etc.)
Postsurgical muscular or neurogenic
Radiation
Corrosive (pill injury, intentional, cytolomegalovirus, candida, etc.)
Infectious: diphtheria, botulism, lyme disease, syphilis, mucositis (herpes)
Metabolic: amyloidosis, Cushing’s syndrome, thyrotoxicosis, Wilson’s disease, myopathic connective tissue disease (overlap
syndrome)
Paraneoplastic syndromes
Neurological diseases
Myasthenia gravis, myotonic dystrophy, oculopharyngeal dystrophy dermatomyositis, polymyositis, sarcoidosis, cerebral
palsy, Guillain–Barré syndrome
Metabolic encephalopathies
Neurological brainstem tumours
Head trauma
Stroke
Huntington’s disease
Multiple sclerosis
Postpolio syndrome
Tardive dyskinesia
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
Parkinson’s disease
Dementia
Elderly
Structural disease
Cricopharyngeal bar, Zenker’s diverticulum, cervical webs
Oropharyngeal tumours
Osteophytes and skeletal abnormalities
Congenital (cleft palate, diverticula, pouches, etc.)
depression
Audiogenic
(alterations in volume, frequency, pitch, texture),
clinical signs (endoscopic inspection with morphological and dynamic findings) and/or subjective
physical signs (phonastenia, pharyngolaryngeal
paraesthesia) and psychological signs (own voice
perceived as unpleasant or inadequate), which
are occasionally or constantly present in all or only
in certain communication situations (Bergamini
et al. 2002).
5.2 Deglutition Alterations
From a brief overview of the conditions that may be
related to the onset of dysphagia, many common

Voice and Dysphagia 185
https://t.me/med1917
pathogenetic events can be identified, with a combination of swallowing and voice disorders (Table 5
(Cook and Kahrilas 1999)).
5.3 The Effects of Reflux
One of the main causes of comorbidity involved in
voice and swallowing disorders is LPR, which is
treated in a separate chapter in this volume. The topic
will therefore be taken into account only as a concausal factor.
LPR involves different anatomical sites, including
the lower oesophageal sphincter, oesophagus, upper
oesophageal sphincter, laryngeal structures, oral
cavity, trachea, and lungs. LPR represents the
expression of the locoregional involvement of a gastro-oesophageal reflux (GOR) disease (GORD),
whereas reflux laryngitis is a more circumscribed
expression of the local problem. LPR was characterized as a nosological entity in the 1980s (Wiener et al.
1989; Koufman 1991) at the same time as laryngeal
signs correlated with it gained greater attention
(Belafsky et al. 2001, 2002). Hidden signs of GOR are
an aetiological factor often reported in patients with
ENT problems, especially in relation to voice. In
1989, Wiener et al. (1989) reported 78% of LPR cases
documented with dual-probe pH monitoring in a
series of 32 patients. This is a highly frequent problem in professional voice users and singers. In 1991,
Sataloff et al. (1991) described reflux laryngitis in 265
of 583 voice professionals (45%), including singers,
who had required medical treatment over the previous
12 months. However, reflux laryngitis is often an
occasional finding during visits for other disorders
and not the only cause of the voice problems of which
the patient complains. The incidence of a posterior
laryngitis is lower in patients without dysphonia, but
posterior laryngitis is present in 78% of patients with
hoarseness and in 50% of patients with general voice
problems (Koufman et al. 1988). Other data on the
prevalence of LPR were published in the following
years (Koufman 1991; Koufman et al. 2002). LPR is
often associated with aspiration. This may be clinically irrelevant or may be associated with chronic
cough, reactive airway disease, difficulty in controlling asthma, distal phlogosis and bronchiectasias.
Laryngeal involvement in GORD is often associated
with hyperkinetic phonation in those patients who try
to compensate for an inflammatory condition of the
larynx. Several issues are particularly interesting for
voice professionals, above all, the age of the patients:
many are young and need a long period of pharmacological treatment (pump inhibitors or H2 antagonists). The pharmacological agents used neutralize
the refluxate and many related symptoms, but not the
effect of neutral or alkaline substances (biliary salts)
or enzymes that cause in any case damage to the
larynx, pharynx and lungs. In professional voice users
these substances may continue to cause local symptoms, such as clearing the throat, burning in the throat
and cough (Sataloff et al. 2006).
6 Recent Contributions
in the Literature
Although the correlations between the respiratory and
digestive tracts are so closely interlinked and overlapping and in spite of the vast literature existing on
voice and deglutition disorders when considered
separately, only a few studies have been conducted on
their association in specific populations and even less
with respect to professional voice users.
A bibliography search using the major search
engines confirmed the above. Results from a PubMed
search for articles over the last 10 years including
keywords such as ‘‘dysphagia’’ or ‘‘swallowing
disorders’’ and ‘‘singing voice’’ or ‘‘professional
voice’’ found only 25 articles in which sometimes the
association between singing or professional voice and
dysphagia is actually not strictly relevant. For
instance, Sereg-Bahar et al. (2005) evaluated in a
prospective study the acoustic characteristics of an /a
produced by a sample of 43 patients with LPR before
and after treatment with esomeprasol. The group was
compared with another group of patients with vocal
fold polyps. In addition to this acoustic parameter,
further parameters were evaluated: medical history
and laryngostroboscopic and oesophagogastroscopic
findings. The conclusion was that the drug tested was
effective for LPR management, whereas for LPR
diagnosis, medical history and videolaryngoscopy
proved to be superior to oesophagogastroscopy.
Acoustic voice analysis and laryngoscopic investigation can also be found in the work of Vashani
et al. (2010), who evaluated the effectiveness of voice
therapy in a group of 32 patients with GORD and

186 D. Farneti
https://t.me/med1917
dysphonia. The sample was subdivided into two
groups: voice therapy combined with omeprazole and
omeprazole alone, with follow-up evaluation after
6 weeks. Voice analysis included jitter, shimmer,
harmonic-to-noise ratio and normalized noise energy.
Oesophageal and laryngeal signs were assigned
according to the reflux symptom index. The authors
reported an improvement in all voice parameters and
better results of the pharmacological treatment if it
was combined with vocal therapy.
Similarly, Siupsinskiene et al.(2009) considered six
parameters of the voice range profile and five parameters ofthe speechrange profile in a group of 60 female
dysphonic patients with LPR compared with a sample
of 66 subjects with normal voice. In their conclusions
the authors reported a reduced vocal capacity as documented by voice range profile measures in LPR
patients and underlined the usefulness of these measures in the pre-post treatment quantitative assessment
of voice performance. Similar conclusions were drawn
by Oguz etal. (2007) andPribuisienë et al.(2005). In an
Italian study, the correlation between LPR and dysphonia was assessed in a sample of 62 patients without
significant laryngoscopic findings and vocal abuse
history by using a questionnaire validated for typical
reflux signs versus a sample of subjects without voice
problems. Electroacoustic, laryngostroboscopic and
24-h pH monitoring dataofthe two samples suggesteda
correlation between the amount and duration of the
reflux (in patients with pH-metry suggestive of LPR)
and a dysfunction of arytenoid muscles causing laryngeal compensatory stress, which was in turn
responsible for chronic fatigue (Cesari et al. 2004). In
contrast, no significant variation in electroacoustic
parameters was found by Hamdan et al. (2001)ina
sample of 22 patients with GOR-induced laryngeal
signs treated for 4 weeks with pantoprazole (40 mg
twice daily) and cisapride (20 mg twice daily). The
treatment actually determined a quickdisappearance of
vocal symptoms (vocal fatigue and excess mucus production) and endoscopic signs.
The association between hoarseness and LPR was
studied by Ozturk et al. (2006) in a sample of 43
subjects presenting with hoarseness for over 3 months
and 20 control subjects. All subjects underwent videolaryngoscopic evaluation and 24-h double-probe
pH monitoring. The results obtained by comparing
data from the two methods in the two populations
showed that in the study group 27 of 43 patients
(62.8%) had laryngeal reflux episodes, whereas in the
control group only six of 20 patients (30%) had laryngeal reflux episodes. The average of number of
pharyngeal reflux episodes was 7 in 24 h (standard
deviation, SD, 8.8) in the study patients versus 0.9 in
24 h (SD 1.9) in the control group, with P = 0.003. In
the study group the average number of LPR episodes
was 5.8 (SD 7.0) in an upright position versus 1.2 (SD
3.3) in a supine position, both values being significantly higher than those found in the control group
(P = 0.005 and P = 0.014, respectively), thereby
demonstrating that LPR is significantly greater in
patients with hoarseness than in the control subjects,
although they had LPR as well. The results of this
study have further shown that the most common
symptoms in the study group were heartburn and
persistent throat clearing, whereas the endoscopic
clinical finding was pachydermia. This may suggest
that the severity of LPR rather than its presence may
be the factor that triggers the onset of symptoms.
Some works found in the bibliography search are
epidemiology studies. Among these, Roy et al. (2005)
evaluated a random sample of 1,326 subjects interviewed with a questionnaire and reported that the
lifetime prevalence of a voice disorder was 29.9%, with
6.6% of participants reporting a current voice disorder.
The logistic regression correlated such data with some
risk factors: sex (female), age (40–59 years), conditions and demands of vocal usage, oesophageal reflux,
exposure to chemical agents and frequent colds and
sinus infections. Paradoxically, the consumption of
tobacco or alcohol was found not to increase the
chances of developing a chronic voice disorder. Voice
disorders proved to have a negative impact on work
performance (4.3%) and work attendance: 7.2% of interviewees reported that they had been absent from
work for 1 day or more in the course of the previous
year and 2% ofinterviewees reported thattheyhad been
absent for more than 4 days becauseof voice problems.
Abnormal laryngeal findings that can be correlated
to reflux were identified in a sample of 65 asymptomatic singing students who underwent videostroboscopic evaluation. Five students (8.3%) exhibited
benign vocal fold lesions (two with nodules and three
with cysts) and 44 students (73.4%) exhibited posterior erythema, suggesting possible reflux (Lundy
et al. 1999). This correlation was considered useful to
plan preventive measures in young singing professionals with high vocal demands.

Voice and Dysphagia 187
https://t.me/med1917
Similar considerations were made by Elias et al.
(1997) after observing 58% laryngeal abnormalities in
six different clinical entities in a population of 65
professional singers who voluntarily underwent strobovideolaryngoscopic evaluation . The authors confirmed the usefulness of standardizing normal
strobovideolaryngoscopic findings in professional
singers, being aware of the variability of laryngeal
behaviour in this population. Similarly, HemanAckah et al. (2002) studied 20 singing teachers who
voluntarily underwent strobovideolaryngoscopic
evaluation, of whom seven reported voice problems
and 13 a normal voice. The presence of organic
lesions (vocal fold masses) was a common finding in
asymptomatic teachers, whereas reflux laryngitis was
found in both symptomatic and asymptomatic teachers. Movement asymmetry was more common in
singing teachers with voice disorders. Dysphonia and
LPR findings were associated in a group of eight
singers with bulimia, leading to the conclusion that
LPR may be a factor that contributes to the development of vocal disorders in singers with bulimia
(Rothstein 1998).
What is more interesting is the association between
functional dysphonia and LPR. The correlation
between the two entities has been investigated by
several authors. Karkos et al. (2007) studied 23 subjects with dysphonia for over 3 months, by comparing
them with eight healthy volunteers. Of the initial
sample 22 dysphonic patients and six healthy subjects
completed the protocol that included a 24-h dualprobe pH-metry. Of all the parameters studied, the
longest duration (in seconds) of reflux episodes in the
supine position and the time fraction in which the pH
was below 4 in the supine position were significantly
longer in dysphonic patients than in control subjects
(P \ 0.05). This led the authors to conclude that there
is a correlation between LPR and the two parameters,
although many more parameters may determine
functional dysphonia, including ‘‘medical’’ and psychological causes.
A A 30-month retrospective review of 150 subjects
(60% females and 40% males, mean age 42.3 years)
with muscle tension dysphonia was conducted by
Altman et al. (2005). Medical history showed
the presence of GOR (49%), high stress levels
(18%), vocal ablise (63%) and vocal misase (23%).
Instrumental clinical evaluation performed in
82% of patients showed the presence of anatomical
abnormalities in 52.3% of subjects (vocal fold oedema,
or paralysis/paresis). Speech–language assessment
identified a poor phonatory support to breathing,
improperly low voice pitch and visible neck tension in
most patients. Adequate voice volume was observed in
23.3% of patients. This range of factors indicates the
presence of multiple factors in the genesis of muscle
tension dysphonia.
The association between dysfunction factors, such
as extrinsic laryngeal muscular tension and muscle
misuse dysphonia, and GOR was investigated by
Angsuwarangsee and Morrison (2002). A sample of
465 patients (65% females and 35% males) were
sequentially evaluated and extrinsic laryngeal muscular tension results were analysed in relation to GOR
diagnosis. A close relationship (P B 0.01) was found
between the thyroid muscle in GOR patients and
muscle misuse dysphonia, indicating that there might
be a correlation between the extrinsic and intrinsic
laryngeal muscular tension, which is useful in the
diagnosis of muscle misuse dysphonia.
A professional susceptibility to GOR related to
professional singing was suggested by several authors.
The first work dates back to 2003 (Cammarota et al.
2003), reporting on the experience conducted with
four professional singers who showed decreased
respiratory muscle functioning during reflux episodes
during performances. Reflux episodes were related to
the quick and prolonged need to increase intraabdominal pressure owing to the need to reduce subglottic pressure. According to the authors, this was the
first case described in the literature of a worsening of
GORD symptoms in professional singers during
performances.
This study was followed by another work by the
same lead author (Cammarota et al. 2007) with the
purpose of studying the prevalence of GOR symptoms
in a group of professional opera choristers versus a
control group of non-singers. A total of 351 opera
choristers belonging to professional lyrical choruses
from various Italian regions were compared with 578
subjects resident in the same areas with a similar age
and sex distribution. By means of a structured questionnaire, the occurrence of reflux symptoms in the
course of the previous year, individual characteristics
and life habits of the two groups were investigated.
Prevalence rate ratios, adjusted for sex, age, body
mass index, smoking status, alcohol consumption and
other confounding factors, were computed.

188 D. Farneti
https://t.me/med1917
In the sample of choristers, a statistically significant increase in heartburn, regurgitation, cough and
hoarse voice was observed versus the control sample,
with adjusted prevalent rate ratios of 1.60 [95%
confidence interval (CI), 1.32–1.94], 1.81 (95% CI,
1.42–2.30), 1.40 (95% CI, 1.18–1.67) and 2.45 (95%
CI, 1.97–3.04), respectively. Multivariate analysis
correlated regurgitation in a consistent way with the
cumulative duration of singing activity (P = 0.04)
and weekly singing performances (P = 0.005). The
authors concluded by reporting a greater prevalence
of reflux symptoms in opera choristers versus control
subjects. They also underlined the need for further
investigation to clarify whether GOR in this population is stress-related and may be considered as a
professional disease. As to the relation with stress,
Marchese et al. (2008) described the case of a
49-year-old professional soprano with a 6-year history
of regurgitation and pyrosis in association with an
increased time to achieve adequate vocal warm-up,
restricted vocal tone placement, and decreased pitch
range. After the diagnosis of posterior laryngitis and
negative oesophagogastroduodenoscopy findings, a
functional study with oesophageal manometry and
pharyngeal pH monitoring was conducted. Oesophageal manometry documented lower oesophageal
sphincter incompetence and isolated episodes of
upper oesophageal sphincter hypertonia. Pharyngeal
pH monitoring (the patient was asked to perform her
normal singing and vocal warm-up activity) reported,
during singing, 69 episodes of pharyngeal reflux
equivalent to 10% of the total reflux time, which is 10
times higher than that previously described as the
upper limit (0.9%) in healthy volunteers. This finding
suggested a correlation between pharyngeal acid
exposure and singing, thereby indicating that such a
condition may be considered related to this professional activity. The authors agreed that further data
are required to support this conclusion.
The latest work on this topic was conducted by
Pregun et al. (2009), who considered the prevalence of
GOR symptoms in a population of professional opera
choristers (202 subjects), wind players (71 subjects),
glassblowers (43 subjects) and water polo players
(54 subjects) in comparison with a sample of 115
subjects. By means of a questionnaire, the occurrence
of reflux symptoms, individual characteristics and life
habits of the two groups were investigated. Statistical
processing of data showed a statistically higher
prevalence of heartburn, regurgitation and hoarseness
in professional choristers than in control subjects
(P \ 0.001). Among professional wind players,
heartburn and regurgitation were significantly more
frequent than in controls (P \0.05 and P \0.01,
respectively). Glassblowers reported a significantly
higher prevalence of acid regurgitation in comparison
with controls (P\ 0.01). The prevalence of reflux
symptoms in water polo players was similar to that of
controls. In opera choristers, wind players and glassblowers, reflux symptoms appeared to be significantly
correlated with the cumulative lifetime duration of
professional singing, playing and working activity,
respectively (P \ 0.05).
The results reported by the authors in agreement
with the findings of Cammarota et al. (2007) demonstrated that professional opera choristers, professional
wind players and glassblowers had a higher prevalence
of reflux symptoms than control subjects. This workrelated condition was found to have a negative impact
on quality of life and professional performances.
References
Altman KW, Atkinson C, Lazarus C (2005) Current and
emerging concepts in muscle tension dysphonia: a 30-month
review. J Voice 19(2):261–267
Angsuwarangsee T, Morrison M (2002) Extrinsic laryngeal
muscular tension in patients with voice disorders. J Voice
16(3):333–343
Ardzakus FK, Wyke B (1979) Innervation of the subglottic
mucosa of the larynx and its significante. Folia Phoniatr
(Basel) 31:271–283
Arensburg B, Tillier AM, Vandermeersch B, Duday H,
Schepartz LA, Rak Y (1989) A middle palaeolithic human
hyoid bone. Nature 338:758–760
Aronson AE (1980) Clinical voice disorders. An interdisciplin-
ary approach. Thieme, New York
Baitha S, Raizada RM, Kennedy Singh AK, Puttewar MP,
Chaturvedi VN (2002) Clinical profile of hoarseness of
voice. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 54(I):14–18
Baken RJ (1997) Airflow and volume. In: Baken RJ (ed)
Clinical measurement of speech and voice. Singual Pub-
lishing, San Diego
Belafsky PC, Postma GN, Koufman JA (2001) The validity and
reliability of the reflux finding score (RFS). Laryngoscope
111(8):1313–1317
Belafsky PC, Postma GN, Koufman KA (2002) Validity and
reliability of the reflux symptom index (RSI). J Voice
16:274–277
Bergamini G, Casolino D, Schindler O (2002) Inquadramento
delle disfonie. In Casolino D (ed). Le disfonie: fisiopato-
logia, clinica ed aspetti medico-legali. Pacini Editore
Medicina, Pisa

Voice and Dysphagia 189
https://t.me/med1917
Blitzer A, Brin MF, Ramig LO (1992) Neurologic disorders of
the larynx, 2nd edn. Thieme, New York
Bouchayer M, Cornut G, Witzing E, Loire R, Roch JB,
Bastian R (1985) Epidermoid cysts, sulci and mucosal
bridges of the true vocal cord. Laryngoscope 95:1087–1094
Brodnitz FS (1971) Hormones and the human voice. Bull N Y
Acad Med 47(2):183–191
Cammarota G, Elia F,Cianci R, Galli J, Paolillo N, Montalto M,
Gasbarrini G (2003) Worsening of gastroesophageal reflux
symptoms in professional singers during performances.
J Clin Gastroenterol 36(5):403–404
Cammarota G, Masala G, Cianci R, Palli D, Capaccio P,
Schindler A, Cuoco L, Galli J, Ierardi E, Cannizzaro O,
Caselli M, Dore MP, Bendinelli B, Gasbarrini G (2007)
Reflux symptoms in professional opera choristers. Gastroenterology 132(3):890–898
Castell DO (1999) The esophagus, 3rd edn. Lippincott,
Philadelphia
Cesari U, Galli J, Ricciardiello F, Cavaliere M, Galli V (2004)
Dysphonia and laryngopharyngeal reflux. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 24(1):13–19
Cook IJ, Kahrilas PJ (1999) AGA technical review on
management of oropharyngeal dysphagia. Gastroenterology
116:455–478
Coyle SM, Weinrich BD, Stemple JC (2001) Shifts in relative
prevalence of laryngeal pathology in a treatment-seeking
population. J Voice 15:424–440
Dejonckère PH (1987) Physiologie phonatoire du larynx: le
concept oscilloimpédantiel. Rev Laryng 108:365–368
Dent J, Wylie J, Dodds J et al (1983) Interdigestive phasic
contractions of the human lower esophageal sphincter.
Gastroenterology 84:453–460
Diez Gross R, Mahlmann J, Grayhack JP (2003) Physiologic
effects of open and closed thacheostomy tubes on the
pharyngeal swallow. Ann Otol Laryngol 112:143–152
Duchin LE (1990) The evolution of articulate speech: compar-
ative anatomy of the oral cavity in Pan and Homo. J Hum
Evol 19:687–697
Elias ME, Sataloff RT, Rosen DC, Heuer RJ, Spiegel JR (1997)
Normal strobovideolaryngoscopy: variability in healthy
singers. J Voice 11(1):104–107
Emerenziani S, Zhang X, Blondeau K et al (2005) Gastric
fullness, physical activity, and proximal extent of gastroesophageal reflux. Am J Gastroenterol 100:1251–1256
Fant G (1983) The voice source: theory and acoustic modeling.
In: Titze RI, Scherer R (eds) Vocal fold fisiology: biomechanics, acoustics and phonatory control. Center for
Performing Arts, Denver
Fouand YM, Khoury RM, Hatlebakk JG et al (1998) Ineffective
esophageal motility (IEM) is more prevalent in reflux
patients with respiratory symptoms. Am J Gastroenterol
114(S1):A123 (abstract 0506)
Fussi F (2003) I parametri acustici nell’estetica e nella
fisiologia del canto. In: Fusi F (ed) La voce del cantante,
vol II. Omega, Turin
Gerhardt DC, Shuck TJ, Bordeaux RA, Winship DH (1978)
Human upper esophageal sphincter: response to volume,
osmotic and acid stimuli. Gastroenterology 75:268–274
Hamdan AL, Sharara AI, Younes A, Fuleihan N (2001) Effect
of aggressive therapy on laryngeal symptoms and voice
characteristics in patients with gastroesophageal reflux.
Acta Otolaryngol 121(7):868–872
Heman-Ackah YD, Dean CM, Sataloff RT (2002) Strobo-
videolaryngoscopic findings in singing teachers. J Voice
16(1):81–86
Hirano M (1977) Structure and vibratory pattern of the vocald
folds. In: Sawashima N, Cooper FS (eds) Dynamic aspects
of speech production. University of Tokyo, Tokyo
Houghton P (1993) Neandertal supralaryngeal vocal tract. Am J
Phys Anthropol 90(2):139–146
Jaeger MJ, Matthys H (1968) The pattern of flow in the upper
human airways. Resp Physiol 6:113–127
Jones K, Sigmon J, Hock L, Nelson E, Sullivan M, Ogren F
(2002) Prevalence and risk factors for voice problems
among telemarketers. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
128:571–577
Jurgens U (1974) On the elicitability of vocalisztion from the
cortical lerynx area. Brain Res 81:564–566
Karkos PD, Yates PD, Carding PN, Wilson JA (2007) Is
laryngopharyngeal reflux related to functional dysphonia?
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 116(1):24–29
Kirchner JA (1993) The vertrebate larynx: adaptation and
aberrations. Laryngoscope 103:1197–1201
Kouffman JA, Amin MR, Panetti M (2000) Prevalence of reflux
in 113 consecutive patients with laringea and voice
disorders. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 123:385–388
Koufman JA (1991) The otolaryngologic manifestation of
gastroesophageal disease (GERD) a clinical investigation of
225 patients using ambulatory 24-pH monitoring and an
experimental investigation of the role of acid and pepsin in
the development of laryngeal injury. Laryngoscope
101(Suppl 53):1–78
Koufman JA, Wiener GJ, Wu WC, Castell DO (1988) Reflux
laryngitis and its sequelae: the diagnostic role of ambulatory
24-h pH monitoring. J Voice 2(1):78–89
Koufman JA, Aviv JA, Casiano RR, Shaw GY (2002)
Laryngopharyngeal reflux: position statement of the
Committee on Speech, Voice, and Swallowing Disorders
of the American Academy of Otolaryngology—Head and
Neck Surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 127:32–35
Laitman JT, Reindenberg JS (1993) Specializations of the
human upper respiratory and upper digestive system as seen
through comparative and developmental anatomy. Dyspha-
gia 8:318–325
Larson CR, Yajima Y, Ko P (1994) Modification in activity of
medullary respiratory-related neurons for vocalisation and
swallowing. J Neurophysiol 71:2294–2304
Lieberman P (1979) Hominid evolution, supralaryngeal vocal
tract physiology, and the fossil evidence for reconstructions.
Brain Lang 7(1):101–126
Long J, Williford HN, Olson MS, Wolfe V (1998) Voice
problems and risk factors among aerobics instructors.
J Voice 12:197–207
Lotze M, Seggevies G, Erb M, Grodd W, Birbaumer N (2000)
The representation of articulation in primary sensorimotor
cortex. Neuroreport 11:2985–2989
Lundy DS, Casiano RR, Sullivan PA, Roy S, Xue JW, Evans J
(1999) Incidence of abnormal laryngeal findings in asymp-
tomatic singing students. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
121(1):69–77

190 D. Farneti
https://t.me/med1917
Marchese M, Spada C, Costamagna G (2008) Stress-related
esophagopharyngeal reflux during warm-up exercises in a
singer. Gastroenterology 134(7):2192–2193; author reply
2193–2194 (Epub 16 May 2008)
Maddock DJ, Gilbert RJ (1993) Quantitative relationship
between liquid bolus flow and laringea closure during
deglutition. Am J Physiol 265:G704–G711
Milutinovic Z (1966) Classification of voice pathology. Folia
Phoniatr Logop 48:301–308
Mittal RK, Balaban DH (1997) The esophagogastric junction.
N Engl J Med 336:924–932
Mittal RK, Fisher M, McCallum RW et al (1990) Human lower
esophageal sphincter response to increased abdominal
pressure. Am J Physiol 258:G624–G630
Negus VE (1949) The comparative anatomy and physiology of
the larynx. Heinemann, London
Nishino T, Yonezawa T, Honda Y (1985) Effects of swallowing
on the pattern of continuous respiration in human adults.
Am Rev Respir Dis 12:1219–1222
Oguz H, Tarhan E, Korkmaz M, Yilmaz U, Safak MA, Demirci
M (2007) Acoustic analysis findings in objective laryngopharyngeal reflux patients. Ozluoglu LNJ Voice 21(2):
203–210
Ozturk O, Oz F, Karakullukcu B, Oghan F, Guclu E, Ada M
(2006) Hoarseness and laryngopharyngeal reflux: a cause
and effect relationship or coincidence? Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 263(10):935–939
Perello J (1962) La théorie muco-ondulatoire de la phonation.
Ann Oto Larynx 79:722–725
Pregun I, Bakucz T, Banai J, Molnár L, Pavlik G, Altorjay I,
Orosz P, Csernay L, Tulassay Z, Herszényi L (2009)
Gastroesophageal reflux disease: work-related disease? Dig
Dis 27(1):38–44 (Epub 8 May 2009)
Pribuisienë R, Uloza V, Saferis V (2005) Multidimensional
voice analysis of reflux laryngitis patients. Eur Arch
Otorhinolaryngol 262(1):35–40
Purves D, Litchman JW (1985) Principles of neural develop-
ment. Sinauer, Sunderland, p 340
Remacle M, Lawson G (1994) Troubles fonctionelle du larynx.
Encycl Méd Chir Oto-rhino-laryngologie. Elsevier, Paris
Rosen AC, Murry T (2000) Nomenclature of voice disorders
and vocal pathology. In: Rosen AC, Murry T (eds) The
otolaryngologic clinics of North America (voice disorders
and phonosurgery II). Saunders, Philadelphia
Rothstein SG (1998) Reflux and vocal disorders in singers with
bulimia. J Voice 12(1):89–90
Roy N, Merrill RM, Gray SD, Smith EM (2005) Voice
disorders in the general population: prevalence, risk factors,
and occupational impact. Laryngoscope 115(11):1988–1995
Sapir S, Keidar A, Mathers-Schmidt B (1993) Vocal attrition in
teachers: survey findings. Eur J Dis Commun 28:177–185
Sataloff RT (1992) The human voice. Sci Am 267:108–115
Sataloff RT (1993) The human voice. Sci Am 267:108–115
Sataloff RT (1997) Professional voice. The science and art of
clinical care, 2nd edn. Singular Publishing, San Diego
Sataloff RT, Spiegel JR, Hawkshaw MJ (1991) Strobovideo-
laryngoscopy: results and clinical value. Ann Otol Rhynol
Laryngol 100(9):725–727
Sataloff RT, Castell DO, Katz PO, Sataloff DM (2006) Reflux
laryngitis and related disorders, 3rd edn. Plural Publishing,
San Diego
Schindler O (1980) Afonie e disfonie. In: Schindler O (ed)
Breviario della patologia della comunicazione. Omega,
Turin
Schwartz SR, Cohen SM, Daily SH, Rosenfeld RM et al (2009)
Clinical practice guideline: hoarseness (dysphonia). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 141:S1–S31
Segre R (1976) La comunicazione orale normale e patologica.
Medico Scientifiche, Turin
Sereg-Bahar M, Jansa R, Hocevar-Boltezar I (2005) Voice
disorders and gastroesophageal reflux. Logoped Phoniatr
Vocol 30(3–4):120–124
Shafik A, El-Sibai O, Shafik AA et al (2004) Effect of
straining on the lower esophageal sphincter: identification
of the ‘‘strainingesophageal reflex’’ and its role in gastroesophageal competence mechanism. J Invest Surg 17:
191–196
Siupsinskiene N, Adamonis K, Toohill RJ (2009) Usefulness of
assessment of voice capabilities in female patients with
reflux-related dysphonia. Medicina (Kaunas) 45(12):
978–987
Smith E, Lemke J, Taylor M, Kirchner L, Hoffman H (1998)
Frequency of voice problems among teachers and other
occupations. J Voice 12:480–488
Soulié A, Bardier F (1907) Recherches sur le developpement du
larynx chez l’homme. J Anat Physiol 43:137–240
Spiegel JR, Sataloff RT, Cohn JR, Hawkshaw M, Epstein J
(1988) Respiratory function in singer: medical assessment,
diagnosis and treatment. J Voice 2(1):40–50
Titze IR (1994) Control of vocal intensity and efficiency. In:
Titze IR (ed.) Principles of voice production, Prentice hall,
New Jersey
Titze I, Lemke J, Montequin D (1997) Populations in the
U.S.Workforce who rely on voice as a primary tool of trade:
a preliminary report. J Voice 11:254–259
Ursino F (1995) Le disfonie. In: Schindler O, Genovese E,
Rossi M, Ursino F (eds) Foniatria. Masson, Milan
Van Den Berg J (1954) Sur lès théories myoélastique et
neurochronaxique de la phonation. Rev Laryngol 75:492–
512
Vashani K, Murugesh M, Hattiangadi G, Gore G, Keer V,
Ramesh VS, Sandur V, Bhatia SJ (2010) Effectiveness of
voice therapy in reflux-related voice disorders. Dis Esophagus 23(1):27–32 (Epub 22 Jun 2009)
Vilkman E (2000) Voice problems at work: a challenge for
occupational safety and health arrangement. Folia Phoniatr
Logop 52:20–125
Widdicombe J (1986) The neural reflexes in the airways. Eur J
Resp Dis Suppl 144:1–33
Wiener GJ, Koufmann JA, Wu WC et al (1989) Chronic
hoarseness secondary to gastroesophageal reflux disease:
documentation with 24-pH monitoring. Am J Gasroenterol
84:1503–1508
Wingate JM, Brown WS, Shrivastav R, Davenport P, Sapienza
CM (2007) Treatment outcomes for professional voice
users. J Voice 21:433–449
Wolfson VP, Laitman JT (1990) Ultrasound investigation of
fetal human upper respiratory anatomy. Anat Rec 227:
363–372
Wuttge-Hannig A, Hannig C (2009) Diagnostica per immagini.
In: Schindler O (ed) La voce. Fisiologia, patologia clinica e
terapia. Piccin, Padua

Psychiatric Aspects of Dysphagia
https://t.me/med1917
Margareta Bu¨low
Contents
1 Introduction and Terminology............................... 191
2 Symptoms in Psychogenic Dysphagia ................... 192
3 Epidemiology............................................................ 193
4 Swallowing Evaluation ............................................ 194
5 Treatment of Psychogenic Dysphagia ................... 194
6 Conclusion ................................................................ 196
References.......................................................................... 196
Abstract
Dysphagia with a psychiatric background is a rare
condition, not so well understood, and presents
with no structural or organic disease being detectable. Fear of swallowing and avoidance of swallowing specific foods, fluids, or pills seem to be the
most frequent symptoms in psychogenic dysphagia, and may result in malnutrition and weight loss.
When psychogenic dysphagia is suspected, a
thorough swallowing evaluation is necessary,
involving clinical as well as instrumental examinations. A multidisciplinary approach is required.
Professionals from the fields of neurology, otolaryngology, speech–language pathology, radiology,
and gastroenterology may be involved. The diagnosis of psychogenic dysphagia should, to avoid
misdiagnosis, be reserved for patients with strong
psychological symptoms and fear of swallowing.
The most effective treatment of psychogenic
dysphagia seems to be a combination of psychological treatment and dysphagia therapy. Antianxiety medications may be effective in some cases.
Close collaboration between the dysphagia clinician and psychologists is necessary for the optimal
management.
M. Bülow (&)
Neurological Department and Diagnostic Centre
of Imaging and Functional Medicine,
Skåne University Hospital, 205 02, Malmö, Sweden
e-mail: margareta.bulow@med.lu.se
O. Ekberg (ed.), Dysphagia, Medical Radiology. Diagnostic Imaging, DOI: 10.1007/174_2011_342,
Ó Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012
1 Introduction and Terminology
In the treatment of dysphagic patients with acute or
chronic problems where no structural or organic
disease could be diagnosed, the cause may be psychiatric. Dysphagia with a psychiatric cause is a rare
condition, and not so well understood. In the literature,
191
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
