Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_4547_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
25 Мб
Скачать
Pediatric Aspect of Dysphagia 151
https://t.me/med1917
Table 5 Examples of observations that may relate to cranial nerve function according to Arvedson and Brodsky (2001)
Cranial nerve
V Food on the tongue Chewing Bolus not formed VII Sucking
IX and X Bolus into posterior part of the oral
XII Food on the tongue Refinement of the apex and protrusion Miss lateral contraction, of rise
RDTP Delayed pharyngeal phase initiation
Input Normal answer Overdrawn answer
Food on the lower lip Smile
chamber
Labial gripping Labial closing Labial retraction
Swallowing reflex initiated in less than 2 seconds
Labial incontinence Limiting or asymmetry of moving Incomplete
RDTP or no initiation
atrophies
Child who cannot; this is a secondary disorder.
Child who does not want to; this is a behavioral
disorder.
Specific therapies are as follows:
(a) Child who does not know how to: The child does
not know because of a shift of acquisition or impossibility to train the infant in the case of prematurity, dysmaturity, or lack of training. For example, in the case of tracheotomy, the larynx is deprived of sensory stimulation and the coordi­nation of swallowing and respiration can be lost. For enteral feeding it may be the oral sensorimotor skills that are not trained and the lost of hunger feeling. It is necessary to stimulate the oral sensorimotor skills and psychological maturation. The child has to find again pleasure in suction and the sensation of hunger to avoid refusing food.
(b) Childwho cannot: The child cannot dobecauseof a
genetic syndrome or malformations. In the fore­ground are neuromotor disorders, which of are central, peripheral, or muscular origins. According to the lesionallevel,theremightbeweaksuctionora lack of sucking reflex. Feeding duration is pro­longed, often associated with drooling, delayed initiation of pharyngeal swallow, and penetration. (Table 5). There can also be craniofacial anomalies with midline defects such as cleft palate or oro­pharyngeal tumor such as lymphangioblastoma. In this case, the oral phase of swallowing is generally disturbed and may result in airway obstruction, requiring a tracheotomy. Finally gastrointestinal tract disorders including motility problems may contraindicate oral feeding and sometimes even enteral feeding. Without appropriate stimulations,
the child will not be able to perform the necessary experiments for a harmonious oral construction. So it maysecondarilyhave a faultyknowledge skill. The treatment consists in adaptational strategies to counteract the neuromotor dysfunction or anatomi­cal anomalies.
(c) Childwhodoes not want to: Thechilddoesnot want
to eat, or totest other texturesor tastes. This is rather a feeding disorder. The child swallows correctly but not for a long time, as if it were very quickly satis­fied. The child refuses to continue by clamping its mouth shut, and turning its head away when the spoon approaches its mouth. Sometimes it may vomit purposefully. The meal is then stopped. Oral intakes remain insufficient. This may induce frac­tionation meals which can worsen GER. After 6 months it isessential in a healthychildto maintain almost 3 h between each meal. In older children, solid food refusal can occur for a variety of reasons, including but not limited to airway or gastrointesti­nal tract factors, oral sensorimotor deficits, and disordered parent–child interactions. The distinc­tion has to be made between an early feeding problem possibly amenable to education and an entrenched eating disorder requiring systematic diagnosis and treatment. A compartmental therapy is indicated for the child and itsparents.Throughout meal sessions the therapist points out to the parents the behaviors that can reinforce food refusal. As described by Borrero et al. (2010) these can include attention (coaxing, threats, praise, reprimands, etc.), escape (spoon or drink removal, allowing the child to leave the table), and tangible delivery (switching to a previously consumed food, toa drink following
152 P. Fichaux Bourin et al.
https://t.me/med1917
Fig. 5 Decision making
Physicians, caregivers, speech therapist, dietetician, physiotherapist,
Of the
Disorder
What
Swallowing disorder Feeding disorder
Why
Anatomical cause Functional cause Induced cause
How
Feeding impact Nutritional impact Speech acquisitions impact
Activity limitation during mealtime
food presentation, etc.). The child trying new tex­tures and tastes during playtime is indicated.
Swallowing and feeding disorders in a child, from sharing the direct impact on the nourishment function of the parents, will have repercussions on the parent– child relationship. A holistic assessment and manage­ment of these disorders cannot be done without the collaboration of the parents. This assessment involves considerations of the broad environment, parent–child interactions, and parental concerns. To be interested in dysphagia in children is to consider the child with its difficulties in its family circle and social environment. It is essentialto enable thechild to progressas well with the eating plan as in its socialization (Fig. 5).
The first support will be psychological support. The part of the interdisciplinary team is very important:
To explain to the parents the swallowing disorder
and the difficulties their child has
To help them be more confident about their own
capacities to manage these difficulties
To reassure them and to trust in their child’s
competencies.
Then there will be educational support: they have to learn adaptational strategies, position, and broader­based sensory and motor intervention to facilitate meal and feeding behavior.
Interdisciplinary assessment
psychologist…
Of the
Child
Medical status Neurodevelopmental and psychological status Motor skills, orthopedic conditions
Person level
Underlying deficits
Body function level
Management
Decisions about oral versus tube feeding
Adjustments of textures and consistencies
Sensorimotor intervention
Supporting parents
Of the
Child’s
environment
Child-parents interactions
Parental concerns
Social and physical mealtime
Society level
5 Summary
To summarize, management of dysphagia in infants is a complex task based on several approaches. Indeed these disorders affect the safety of children, the psychological balance of parents, and the delay in developmental milestones. Therefore, an interdisciplinary team and recurrent assessments are necessary so as to match the child’s development and capacities. The principal aims are to prevent feeding and speech disorders.
References
Abadie V (2004) Diagnostic approach in oral disorder in young
children. Arch Pediatr 11(6):603–605
Abadie V (2008) Apparently isolated feeding behavior troubles
in infant. Arch Pediatr 15(5):837–839
Abadie V, Cheron G, Lyonnet S et al (1996) Isolated neonatal
dysfunction of brainstem. Arch Pediatr 3(2):130–136
Abu-Sultaneh SM, Durst P, Maynard V, Elitsur Y (2010)
Fluticasone and food allergen elimination reverse sub­epithelial fibrosis in children with eosinophilic esophagitis. Dig Dis Sci 56(1):97–102
Albert GW, Menezes AH et al (2010) Chiari malformation
Type I in children younger than age 6 years: presentation and surgical outcome. J Neurosurg Pediatr 5(6):554–561
Pediatric Aspect of Dysphagia 153
https://t.me/med1917
Amaizu N, Shulman R et al (2008) Maturation of oral feeding
skills in preterm infants. Acta Paediatr 97(1):61–67 Amiel-Tison C (2005) Neurologie périnatale, 3rd edn. Masson,
Paris, pp 35–73 Amiel-Tison C et al (2005). Why is the neurological exami-
nation so badly neglected in early childhood? Pediatrics
116(4):1047; author reply 1047–1048 Armstrong-Wells J, Johnston SC et al (2009) Prevalence and
predictors of perinatal hemorrhagic stroke: results from
the Kaiser Pediatric Stroke Study. Pediatrics 123(3):
823–828 Arvedson JC, Brodsky L (2001) Pediatric swallowing and
feeding: assessment and management, 2nd edn. Singular
Publishing Group, Albany, pp 283-388 Arvedson JC, Clark H et al (2010) Evidence-based systematic
review: effects of oral motor interventions on feeding and
swallowing in preterm infants. Am J Speech Lang Pathol
19(4):321–340 Arvedson JC, Lefton-Greif MA (1998) Pediatric video fluoro-
scopic swallow studies: a professional manual withcaregiver
guidelines. The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio Arvedson JC (2008) Assessment of pediatric dysphagia and
feeding disorders: clinical and instrumental approaches.
Dev Disabil Res Rev 14:118–127 Badawi N, Felix JF et al (2005) Cerebral palsy following term
newborn encephalopathy: a population-based study. Dev
Med Child Neurol 47(5):293–298 Barnard K (1978) The family and you. MCN Am J Matern
Child Nurs 3(2):82–83 Borrero C, Vollmer T et al (2010) Concurrent reinforcement
schedules for problem behavior and appropriate behavior:
experimental applications of the matching law. J Exp Anal
Behav 3(93):455–469 Bosma JF (1985) Post natal ontogeny of performances of the
pharynx, larynx and mouth. Am Rev Respir Dis 13(5):S10–5 Bosma JF, Hepburn LG et al (1990) Ultrasound demonstration
of tongue motions during suckle feeding. Dev Med Child
Neurol 32(3):223–229 Buswell CA, Leslie P et al (2009) Oral-motor dysfunction at
10 months corrected gestational age in infants born less
than 37 weeks preterm. Dysphagia 24(1):20–25 Castilloux J, Noble AJ et al (2010) Risk factors for short- and
long-term morbidity in children with esophageal atresia.
J Pediatr 156(5):755–760 Chatoor I, Surles J et al (2004) Failure to thrive and cognitive
development in toddlers with infantile anorexia. Pediatrics
113(5):e440–e447 Couly G, Aubry MC et al (2009) Fetal oral immobility
syndrome. Arch Pediatr 17(1):1–2 de Jong EM, Felix JF et al (2010) Etiology of esophageal
atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula: mind the gap. Curr
Gastroenterol Rep 12(3):215–222 de Lonlay-Debeney P, Cormier-Daire V et al (1997) Features
of DiGeorge syndrome and CHARGE association in five
patients. J Med Genet 34(12):986–989 Delaney AL, Arvedson JC (2008) Development of swallowing
and feeding: prenatal through first year of life. Dev Disabil
Res Rev 14(2):105–117 Dobbelsteyn C, Peacocke SD et al (2008) Feeding difficulties in
children with CHARGE syndrome: prevalence, risk factors,
and prognosis. Dysphagia 23(2):127–135
Dumont RC, Rudolph CD (1994) Development of gastrointest-
inal motility in the infant and child. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 23(4):655–671
Fanucci A, Cerro P et al (1994) Physiology of oral swallowing
studied by ultrasonography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 23(4): 221–225
Ferlito A, Rinaldo A et al (1999) Laryngeal malignant
neoplasms in children and adolescents. Int J Pediatr Otorhi­nolaryngol 49(1):1–14
Gewolb IH, Vice FL (2006) Abnormalities in the coordination
of respiration and swallow in preterm infants with bronch­opulmonary dysplasia. Dev Med Child Neurol 48(7): 595–599
Gluckman PD, Wyatt JS et al (2005) Selective head cooling
with mild systemic hypothermia after neonatal encephalop­athy: multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 365(9460): 663–670
Gomes CF, Thomson Z et al (2009) Utilization of surface
electromyography during the feeding of term and preterm infants: a literature review. Dev Med Child Neurol 51(12): 936–942
Gupta A, Gulati P et al (2009) Effect of postnatal maturation on
the mechanisms of esophageal propulsion in preterm human neonates: primary and secondary peristalsis. Am J Gastro­enterol 104(2):411–419
Hanson MG, Landmesser LT (2004) Normal patterns of
spontaneous activity are required for correct motor axon guidance and the expression of specific guidance molecules. Neuron 43(5):687–701
Hartnick CJ, Hartley BE et al (2000) Pediatric fiberoptic
endoscopic evaluation of swallowing. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 109(11):996–999
Hedberg A, Carlberg EB et al (2005) Development of postural
adjustments in sitting position during the first half year of life. Dev Med Child Neurol 47(5):312–320
Lagercrantz H, Ringstedt T (2001) Organization of the neuronal
circuits in the central nervous system during development. Acta Paediatr 90(7):707–715
Lapillonne A (2010) Early nutrition and the development of the
preterm infant. Arch Pediatr 17(6):711–712
Lapillonne A, Razafimahefa H et al (2011) Nutrition of the
preterm infant. Arch Pediatr 18(1):313–323
Lau C (2007) Development of oral feeding skills in the preterm
infant. Arch Pediatr 14(Suppl 1):S35–S41
Lau C, Alagugurusamy R et al (2000) Characterization of the
developmental stages of sucking in preterm infants during bottle feeding. Acta Paediatr 89(7):846–852
Lau C, Schanler RJ (2000) Oral feeding in premature infants:
advantage of a self-paced milk flow. Acta Paediatr 89(4): 453–459
Lau C, Smith EO et al (2003) Coordination of suck-swallow
and swallow respiration in preterm infants. Acta Paediatr 92(6):721–727
Limme M (2011) The need of efficient chewing function in
young children as prevention of dental malposition and malocclusion. Arch Pediatr 17(Suppl 5):S213–S219
May JG, Shah P et al (2011) Systematic review of endoscopic
airway findings in children with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 120(2):116–122
McAnulty GB, Duffy FH et al (2009) Effects of the newborn
individualized developmental care and assessment program
154 P. Fichaux Bourin et al.
https://t.me/med1917
(NIDCAP) at age 8 years: preliminary data. Clin Pediatr
(Phila) 49(3):258–270 Miller JL, Sonies BC et al (2003) Emergence of oropharyngeal,
laryngeal and swallowing activity in the developing fetal
upper aerodigestive tract: an ultrasound evaluation. Early
Hum Dev 71(1):61–87 Mizuno K, Ueda A (2003) The maturation and coordination
of sucking, swallowing, and respiration in preterm infants.
J Pediatr 142(1):36–40 Nelson KB (2005) Neonatal encephalopathy: etiology and
outcome. Dev Med Child Neurol 47(5):292 Nicholls D, Bryant-Waugh R (2009) Eating disorders of
infancy and childhood: definition, symptomatology, epide-
miology, and comorbidity. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N
Am 18(1):17–30 Nyqvist KH (2008) Early attainment of breastfeeding compe-
tence in very preterm infants. Acta Paediatr 97(6):776–781 Nyqvist KH, Farnstrand C et al (2001) Early oral behaviour in
preterm infants during breastfeeding: an electromyographic
study. Acta Paediatr 90(6):658–663 Nyqvist KH, Rubertsson C et al (1996) Development of the
preterm infant breastfeeding behaviour scale (PIBBS): a
study of nurse–mother agreement. J Hum Lact 12:207–219 Pickler RH, Best AM et al (2006) Predictors of nutritive
sucking in preterm infants. J Perinatol 26(11):693–699 Pieltain C, Habibi F et al (2007) Early nutrition, postnatal
growth retardation and outcome of VLBW infants. Arch
Pediatr 14(Suppl 1):S11–S15 Pinelli J, Symington A (2001) Non-nutritive sucking for
promoting physiologic stability and nutrition in preterm
infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (3):CD001071 Prasse JE, Kikano GE (2009) An overview of pediatric
dysphagia. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 48(3):247–251 Qureshi MA, Vice FL et al (2002) Changes in rhythmic suckle
feeding patterns in term infants in the first month of life.
Dev Med Child Neurol 44(1):34–39 Radzyminski S (2005) Neurobehavioral functioning and
breastfeeding behavior in the newborn. J Obstet Gynecol
Neonatal Nurs 34(3):335–341 Reilly SM et al (1999) Oral-motor dysfunction in children who
fail to thrive: organic or non-organic? Dev Med Child
Neurol 41:115–122 Rosbe KW, Kenna MA et al (2003) Extraesophageal reflux in
pediatric patients with upper respiratory symptoms. Arch
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 129(11):1213–1220 Salinas-Valdebenito L, Nunez-Farias AC et al (2010) Clinical
characterisation and course following therapeutic interven-
tion for swallowing disorders in hospitalised paediatric
patients. Rev Neurol 50(3):139–144 Schaller F, Watrin F et al (2010) A single postnatal injection of
oxytocin rescues the lethal feeding behaviour in mouse
newborns deficient for the imprinted Magel2 gene. Hum
Mol Genet 19(24):4895–4905
Schindler O, Ruoppolo G, Schindler A (2011) Deglutilogia,
2nd edn. Omega, Turin, pp 27–50
Sitton M, Arvedson JC et al (2011) Fiberoptic endoscopic
evaluation of swallowing in children: feeding outcomes related to diagnostic groups and endoscopic findings. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 75(8):1024–1031
Smith PM, Ferguson AV (2008) Neurophysiology of hunger
and satiety. Dev Disabil Res Rev 14(2):96–104
Staiano A, Boccia G et al (2007) Development of esophageal
peristalsis in preterm and term neonates. Gastroenterology 132(5):1718–1725
Stevenson RD,Allaire JH(1991)Thedevelopment ofnormalfeeding
and swallowing. Pediatr Clin North Am 38(6):1439–1453
Symington A, Pinelli J (2001) Developmental care for
promoting development and preventing morbidity in pre­term infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (4):CD001814
Thach BT (2008) Some aspects of clinical relevance in the
maturation of respiratory control in infants. J Appl Physiol 104(6):1828–1834
Thibault H, Castetbon K et al (2010) Why and how to use the
new body mass index curves for children. Arch Pediatr 17(12):1709–1715
Thompson DM (2007) Abnormal sensorimotor integrative
function of the larynx in congenital laryngomalacia: a new theory of etiology. Laryngoscope 117(6 Pt 2 Suppl 114): 1–33
Thouvenin B, d’Arc BF et al (2005) Infantile rumination. Arch
Pediatr 12(9):1368–1371
Thoyre SM, Shaker CS et al (2005) The early feeding skills
assessment for preterm infants. Neonatal Netw 24(3):7–16
Till H, Muensterer OJ et al (2008) Staged esophageal length-
ening with internal and subsequent external traction sutures leads to primary repair of an ultralong gap esophageal atresia with upper pouch tracheoesophagel fistula. J Pediatr Surg 43(6):E33–E35
Ullenhag A, Persson K et al (2009) Motor performance in very
preterm infants before and after implementation of the newborn individualized developmental care and assessment programme in a neonatal intensive care unit. Acta Paediatr 98(6):947–952
Vandenplas Y et al (2009) Pediatric gastroesophageal reflux
clinical practice guidelines: joint recommendations of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (NASPGHAN) and the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (ESPGHAN). J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 49(4): 498–547
WHO (2001) International classification of functioning,
disability and health: world health assembly resolution WHA54.21, 54th session, 22 May 2001
Wu YW, March WM et al (2004) Perinatal stroke in children
with motor impairment: a population-based study. Pediat­rics 114(3):612–619
Dysphagia in Systemic Disease
https://t.me/med1917
Thomas Mandl and Olle Ekberg
Contents
1 Primary Sjögren’s Syndrome................................. 155
2 Rheumatoid Arthritis .............................................. 156
3 Scleroderma (Systemic Sclerosis) .......................... 157
4 Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ............................. 158
5 Pemphigus and Pemphigoid ................................... 158
6 Epidermolysis Bullosa Dystrophica ....................... 158
7 Lichen Planus........................................................... 159
8 Behçet Disease .......................................................... 159
9 Sarcoidosis ................................................................ 159
10 Berylliosis.................................................................. 160
11 Inflammatory Myopathies ...................................... 160
References.......................................................................... 161
O. Ekberg (&) Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Skåne University Hospital, 205 02 Malmö, Sweden e-mail: olle.ekberg@med.lu.se
T. Mandl Department of Rheumatology, Skåne University Hospital, 205 02 Malmö, Sweden
Abstract
Systemic disease may result in dysphagia through numerous mechanisms. For example, salivary gland impairment may result in xerostomia, which as well asresulting in painfulmucosalblistersandulcersmay impair oral function. Acute or chronic inflammatory processes may result in strictures in the esophagus and/or pharynx. Furthermore, altered biomechanics of oral, pharyngeal,andesophagealmusculaturemay be found in patients with rheumatoid arthritis with cervical spine abnormalities and in patients with scleroderma.Finally,systemicvasculitidesinvolving the central nervous system may result in cortical and brainstem ischemia leading to neurological impair­ment hampering the swallowing process.
1 Primary Sjo¨gren’s Syndrome
Primary Sjögren’s syndrome (PSS) is an autoimmune disease, primarily affecting the salivary and lacrimal glands. Impaired salivary and lacrimal secretion and mucosal dryness are the main symptoms. Nonexo­crine organs, including the gastrointestinal tract and the nervous system, may also be involved.
PSS has an increased prevalence in patients with certain HLA-DR2 and DR3 genes. Several non-HLA genes may also be involved, including genes coding for cytokines and second messengers. An androgen/ estrogen imbalance may also be of importance.
PSS is a rheumatic disease with lymphocytic infil­tration and hypofunction in the salivary and lacrimal glands , resulting in dryness of the mouth and eyes, without coexisting connective tissue disease, whereas
O. Ekberg (ed.), Dysphagia, Medical Radiology. Diagnostic Imaging, DOI: 10.1007/174_2012_584, Ó Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012
155
156 T. Mandl and O. Ekberg
https://t.me/med1917
secondary Sjögren’ssyndrome is whenthe syndrome is associated with another connective tissue disease, such as scleroderma, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), or rheumatoid arthritis. Xerostomia is the most com­mon gastrointestinal symptom in PSS patients (Türk et al. 2005; Kjellen et al. 1986; Anselmino et al. 1997a; Rosztóczy et al. 2001; Tsianos et al. 1986; Hradsky et al. 1967). Esophageal dysmotility and esophageal webs have also been reported (Anselmino et al. 1997a; Tsianos et al. 1986; Volter et al. 2004; Palma et al.
1994; Tsianos et al. 1985). Dryness of mucous mem-
branes, due to lack of saliva, impairs swallowing by interfering with the sliding of the bolus on the mucous membranes. Sialometric measurementsmay be closeto 0 ml/min. Esophageal dysmotility including weak contractions, aperistalsis, and tertiary contractions as well as abnormal peristaltic velocity and duration are seen in one third of PSS patients. A decrease in the lower esophageal sphincter pressure has also been reported (Anselmino et al. 1997b). A recent study showed that 65% of PSS patients have dysphagia (Mandl et al. 2007). They presented with solid and/or liquid food dysphagia. Also, a globus feeling was common. Other PSS patients had regurgitation and pyrosis. Some PSS patients had misdirected swallow­ing leading to coughing after swallowing, and haw king when eating. Others had experienced episodes of obstruction when swallowing. Many dysphagic patients had an increased liquid intake during eating.
In PSS patients a sialometric evaluation is of value (Liquidato and Bussoloti Filho 2005). Evaluation of pharyngeal and esophageal function is best done with barium swallow or fiber-endoscopic examination. Manometry of the esophagus can also be of value.
Treatment in PSS patients is in most cases symp­tomatic and local, aiming at reducing the symptoms and consequences of dryness. However, in some cases treatment may be systemic, including use of pilocar­pine and cevimeline. These drugs stimulate the M3 receptors, causing an increased salivary flow. How­ever, side effects of M3R stimulation may be abdominal distress, irritable bladder, and sweating (Thanou-Stavraki and James 2008). The use of bio­logical agents is currently restricted to patients with severe nonexocrine disease, in whom especially B-cell-targeted biologicals, such as rituximab, have shown promising results (Ramos-Casals and Brito­Zerón 2007). The most important treatment is local, including an increased water intake in order to
lubricate the dry mucosal surface. Lozenges and chewing gum stimulate the secretory function even in hypofunctioning salivary glands. Good dental hygiene is most important, since lack of saliva leads to tooth decay.
2 Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid arthritis is an autoimmune disorder that is characterized by small joint synovitis resulting in swelling, pain, stiffness, and loss of function. Perma­nent damage to cartilage as well as bones and sur­rounding tissue may occur. The pathogenesis is multifactorial, and both genetic and environmental factors, especially smoking, are of importance for both the development and the severity of the disease. Lym­phocytes activated bycytokinessuch as TNF invadethe synovia and result in a swelling of the synovia and pannus formation. The disease may result in swallow­ing difficulties through various mechanisms. For example, temporomandibular joint involvement may cause mastication problems. Swelling of synovial membranes in the cricothyroid and cricoarytenoid joints may cause dysphagia (Chen et al. 2005). Med­ullary compression may result from subluxation of the atlantoaxial joint, causing brainstem compression by the odontoid process. The subluxation of the atlanto­axial joint may also cause altered biomechanics of the swallowing musculature.Pannus located inthe anterior cervical spine may cause compression of the cervical esophagus. In addition, xerostomia may also occur in many patients with rheumatoid arthritis. In patients with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, dysphagia may be due to micrognathia(Lindqvist et al. 1986;Ekberg et al.
1987). Dysphagiain rheumatoidarthritis may be dueto
dry mouth, delayed initiation of pharyngeal stage of swallow, and painful swallow (Geterud et al. 1991; Erb et al. 2001; Sun et al. 1974; Ekberg et al. 1987). The clinical evaluation includes imaging and should be done with a broad approach. Early initiation of treat­ment is important in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), methotrexate is the most commonly used. Early initi­ation of treatment with DMARDs improves the prog­nosis and stops or delays the joint destruction process that otherwise is a consequence of the disease. In patients where there is an inadequate response to the first-line DMARDs, a combination of older DMARDs
Dysphagia in Systemic Disease 157
https://t.me/med1917
Fig. 1 A patient with
scleroderma. The esophagus is dilated owing to insufficiency of the lower esophageal sphincter that causes reflux. Acid reflux has caused a stricture in the distal esophagus seen in the single-contrast esophagram in (a) and in the double-contrast esophagram in (b). (Courtesy of Francis J. Scholz, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Lahey Clinic, Burlington, MA, USA)
may be used or biological DMARDs may be used, of which TNF-a blockers are the most widely used. Corticosteroids and NSAIDs are today mainly used to alleviate symptoms while waiting forDMARDs to start exerting their effect, which may take a couple of weeks after treatment has started. Xerostomia usually causes increased waterintake. Chewing gum and lozenges can have a beneficial effect. Other dysfunctions may be treated withdirect or indirect therapies according to the underlying cause.
3 Scleroderma (Systemic Sclerosis)
Scleroderma, or systemic sclerosis (SSc), is a disorder resulting in functional and structural abnormalities of small blood vessels as well as leading to fibrosis of the skin and internal organs. The cause is unknown. Affected tissues show varying degrees of inflamma­tion, fibrosis, and atrophy. The cutaneous lesions often appear symmetrically on the distal extremities and sometimes also on the truncal skin. Patients may show early involvement of internal organs. Raynaud’s phenomenon is common. Findings of antinuclear antibodies with a centromere pattern as well as anti­ScL-70 antibodies support the diagnosis. Sclerosis of oral mucosa and masticatory muscles and salivary gland involvement may result in impaired mouth function and dysphagia (Ntoumazios et al. 2006; Rout et al. 1996). Microstomia, i.e., fibrosis of the perioral tissue, leads to a small mouth, which is a classic
finding of SSc (Pizzo et al. 2003; Menditti et al.
1990). Progressive destruction of smooth muscle
in the esophagus leads to abnormal peristalsis or even aperistalsis. Usually, the tonicity in the lower esophageal sphincter is zero, leading to massive gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Therefore, extensive fibrosis and strictures are common findings in these patients (Fig. 1).
Dysphagia is commoninSSc patients. Intakeoffood is difficult owing to microstomia. Dysphagia is also caused by perioral muscle stiffness in the cheeks and tongue. Decreased elasticity is present in masticatory muscle. Decreased salivary production leads to xero­stomia, i.e.,secondary Sjögren’s syndrome. Symptoms from esophageal dysfunction are also common. In patients with esophageal strictures, the characteristic symptom is obstruction ofsolid foods. The stomachand small bowel may also be involved, resulting in impaired transportation at various levels. Therefore, some of these patients have a very complex set of symptoms. In patients with discrete skin lesions, the diagnosis may be very difficult. In such cases, nail capillary microscopy can be of help in diagnosing the disease. If there aregastrointestinal symptoms, a biopsy can be of value and may show signs of degeneration of smooth muscles and fibrosis. It is important to bear GERD in mind and to do a barium examination of the esophagus and/or gastroscopy.
Current therapies for SSc are still disappointing and mainly consist of symptomatic treatment of the consequences of the disease. Various vasodilatory
158 T. Mandl and O. Ekberg
https://t.me/med1917
drugs such as gastrointestinal prokinetics and proton pump inhibitors are used. In addition, cyclophospha­mide is used for the treatment of concomitant inter­stitial lung disease. No specific treatment is available for muscle fibrosis and muscle degeneration. It is very important to keep in mind that patients with GERD should be treated vigorously in order to avoid the development of strictures.
4 Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an inflam­matory, progressive systemic disease of connective tissue with an autoimmune cause and commonly affects the skin and various internal organs (Virella
1993; Goust and Tsokos 1993). Both antinuclear
antibodies and the more specific anti-double-stran­ded-DNA antibodies may be found in patients with this systemic disease. Classically, patients present with a butterfly-shaped malar rash and photosensi­tivity, i.e., skin rash due to exposure to sunlight. Butterfly-shaped malar rashes usually appear on the cheeks and nose bilaterally in patients with SLE. The patients may present with oral and/or pharyngeal ulcers. Ulcers may also appear on the palate. Xero­stomia appears when the salivary glands are involved. Dysphagia is present in 10% of patients with SLE (Pope 2005). Erythematous oral ulcers and xerosto­mia are usually the result of salivary gland involve­ment. Pharyngeal ulceration may extend into the nasopharynx and even into the larynx. Gastrointesti­nal dysmotility may include the esophagus but also the stomach and small bowel. This dysmotility may be caused by submucosal fibrosis. Cerebrovascular complications are not uncommon in patients with SLE and may cause motor and sensory impairment. The trigeminal and facial nerves may be involved. Assessment of the swallowing function is done with a thorough clinical examination and may also include barium swallow or fiber-endoscopic examinations. Endoscopy is used for assessment of mucosal lesions.
Treatment of SLE includes antimalarials and cor­ticosteroids as well as various more potent immuno­modulating drugs. In the era of biological treatments, B-cell-targeting therapies have shown beneficial effects in SLE patients. Other than the treatments used for specific dysfunctions, there is no specific treat­ment for swallowing impairment in SLE patients.
5 Pemphigus and Pemphigoid
Bullous pemphigoid is a subepidermal blistering skin disease of chronic character. The disease may also involve mucous membranes. Acantholysis is present in pemphigus but not in pemphigoid disease. Pem­phigus and pemphigoid are both autoimmune dis­eases. Pemphigus has antibodies directed against desmosomes, whereas pemphigoid has antibodies directed against hemidesmosomes. These antibodies bind to their antigens and cause blistering by sepa­ration of the dermis and epidermis. The mucosa in the mouth and pharynx may also be affected (Yeh et al.
2003; International Pemphigus and Pemphigoid
Foundation 2011). Mucosal abnormalities cause odynophagia, i.e., painful swallowing. Ruptured blisters may be secondarily infected, which aggra­vates the pain. Submucosal infection may cause fibrosis and strictures. Endoscopy and radiologic swallowing studies are often necessary in order to detect pharyngeal and esophageal involvement in the form of webs and/or strictures. Advanced diseases are treated with corticosteroids and immunosuppressive agents. Good oral hygiene is most important, since secondary infections must be prevented. When there is severe mucosal involvement, eating hard and crunchy foods, chips, raw fruits, or vegetables may be very painful. Local steroids can be of value.
6 Epidermolysis Bullosa Dystrophica
Epidermolysis bullosa dystrophica is an inherent autoimmune disease affecting the skin and the mucosa of the oropharynx. The cause is a genetic defect within the human COL-7A-1 that encodes the pro­duction of collagen. Collagen VII forms the structural link between the epidermal basement membrane and the collagen fibrils in the upper dermis. Sloughing of the mucosa causes ulcers that are easily infected and painful. Even though the oral mucosa is mostly affected, laryngeal, esophageal, and conjunctival mucosa can be involved. The blisters, erosions, and ulcers may lead to scars, webs, and strictures. It has even been reported that esophageal shortening can be caused by such scarring. This may cause hiatal hernia and GERD (Agah et al. 1983). The patient’s symptom is by and large odynophagia.
Dysphagia in Systemic Disease 159
https://t.me/med1917
Topical steroids are often used. Endoscopic dila­tation may be necessary if esophageal strictures develop.
7 Lichen Planus
Lichen planus is a chronic mucocutaneous disease that causes papules or rashes involving the skin and mucous membranes but also the nails and genitals. It is likely to be an autoimmune disease that involves CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes. Parakeratosis is present as well as atrophy of the esophageal epithe­lium. Strictures may have an appearance similar to those in GERD. The strictures are, however, localized in the proximal esophagus. This should raise the suspicion of the cause (Chandan et al. 2008; Madhusudhan and Sharma 2008; Sugerman and Porter 2010; Katzka et al. 2010). Endoscopically elevated lacy white papules, esophageal webs, and pseudomembranes are present. Erosions with and without stenosis may also be present. Strictures are present in advanced cases. Even though the disease is most frequent in the proximal and mid esophagus, the whole esophagus may be involved. The lichenoid lesions may be painful. Odynophagia may occur from lesions in both the oral cavity and the esophagus. Odynophagia is common for solids. Spicy food and liquids may cause pain.
Therapeutic options include systemic corticoste­roids, cyclosporine, and azathioprine. Local steroids can be used. Endoscopic dilatation of strictures is usually needed.
8 Behc¸et Disease
Behçet disease is a vasculitis characterized by aphthous ulcers in the mouth and on the genitals. In addition, various skin lesions, e.g., erythema nodosum and folliculitis, eye lesions, arthritis, venous throm­bosis in various locations, and CNS involvement may be encountered in these patients. The prevalence of the disease is highest in the eastern Mediterranean, the Middle East, and East Asia. In addition, the HLA-B51 gene has been reported to be a strong risk factor for the disease. The vasculitis causes recurrent oral and genital ulcers. Uveitis, erythema nodosum, folliculitis, thrombophlebitis, venous thrombosis,
meningitis or CNS vasculitis as well as arthritis may also be present (Brookes 1983; Levack and Hanson
1979; Demetriades et al. 2009; Messadi and Younai
2010). The ulcers are found on lips, tongue, and on
the inside of the cheeks. Aphthous ulcers may occur as single lesions or in clusters. They may even be found in the esophagus. Ulcers in the oral cavity and mucosa and esophagus are often painful. These ulcers may be provoked by slight trauma. Treatment of the mucosal ulcers includes colchicine, whereas more systemic disease is treated with steroids and various immunomodulatory drugs. Good oral hygiene is important to prevent secondary infection of the ulcers. Strong-tasting food should be avoided as it may cause pain.
9 Sarcoidosis
Sarcoidosis is a granulomatous disease characterized by noncaseating epithelioid granulomas. The lungs and mediastinum are predominant locations, although virtually most other organs may be affec­ted, including the gastrointestinal tract. An autoim­mune cause has been suggested. A reduced delayed­type hypersensitivity response is found in many patients with sarcoidosis. The epitheloid granulomas may occur in the mucosa, where they cause super­ficial nodules and ulcerations that may be painful. Larger granulomas may cause irregular strictures which cause obstruction. They may be difficult to distinguish from malignant strictures on radiologic examination as well as on endoscopy (Bredenoord et al. 2010). Oral sarcoidosis may cause odynopha­gia. Also, esophageal involvement may be painful since esophageal strictures may cause obstruction of a solid bolus. Diagnosis is made by fiber endoscopy and/or barium/iodine contrast medium radiologic evaluation. A solid bolus test should usually be included (Levine et al. 1989; Hardy et al. 1967; Cook et al. 1970).
Oral corticosteroids are usually effective. Advanced disease can be treated with various immunomodula­tory drugs and in severe refractory cases also with infliximab, a TNF-a blocker. Local steroids can be used in the treatment of oral mucosal involvement. Esophageal strictures can be treated with balloon dilatation or may at times have to be surgically resected.
160 T. Mandl and O. Ekberg
https://t.me/med1917
Exposure to beryllium occurs particularly in miners. Other people are exposed in a variety of industries: aerospace, ceramics, dental supplies. The window in X-ray tubes often contains beryllium.
Beryllium exposure occurs primarily by inhalation of beryllium fumes or dust, but even contact through broken skin may occur. Most beryllium is excreted in urine, and the primary half-life ranges from several weeks to 6 months. Relatively insoluble chemical forms of beryllium may be retained for years.
After inhalation of beryllium, large numbers of CD4+ T lymphocytes accumulate in the lungs. These helper T lymphocytes demonstrate a marked prolif-
Fig. 2 An 82-year-old patient with berylliosis. CT of the upper
thorax shows extensive fibrosis with calcifications in the upper lobes and in the mediastinum. In a patient like this, the esophagus is often encroached by the large lymph nodes. (Courtesy of Francis J. Scholz, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Lahey Clinic, Burlington, MA, USA)
eration response on exposure to beryllium. Beryllium seems to induce production of proinflammatory cytokines and growth factors that lead to granuloma formation.
Management of CBD includes cessation of beryl­lium exposure and the use of systemic corticosteroids. However, once pulmonary fibrosis has developed,
10 Berylliosis
corticosteroid therapy cannot reverse the scarring of lung tissue (Flors et al. 2010; Sood 2009).
Berylliosis, or chronic beryllium disease (CBD), is an immunologically mediated granulomatous lung dis­ease due to beryllium sensitization (Flors et al. 2010).
11 Inflammatory Myopathies
CBD is characterized by abnormal formation of inflammatory noncaseating granulomas that causes widespread scarring and most commonly interstitial pulmonary fibrosis. Mediastinal lymph nodes are also involved. A granuloma development may also occur in other organs, including extrapulmonary lymph nodes, skin, subcutaneous tissue, salivary glands, myocardium, liver, and skeletal muscle. Beryllium is a light-weight metal with variable physical and chemical properties that include stiffness, corrosion resistance, and electrical and thermal conductivity. Genetic predispositions seem to have a major role in the development of CBD. A variant of the major histocompatibility complex HLA-DPb1(Glu 69) has been found in many patients (Richeldi et al. 1993).
The symptoms of CBD are dry coughing, fatigue, weight loss, chest pain, increasing shortness of breath, and sometimes also dysphagia due to lymph node impingement on the esophagus. CBD has many similarities with other granulomatous diseases such as tuberculosis, syphilis, and fungal infection. The symptoms are mainly due to extrinsic compression of the esophagus leading to solid bolus dysphagia (Fig. 2).
Inflammatory myopathies include polymyositis, der­matomyositis, and inclusion body myositis (IBM) (Bella and Chad 1996). These inflammatory myopa­thies are characterized by mononuclear inflammatory cell infiltrates, myofibrillar necrosis, and regeneration. In polymyositis, T-lymphocyte cells, monocytes, and plasma cells are located in fascicles within the end­omysial connective tissue. Dermatomyositis is char­acterized by the presence of atrophic fibres in the periphery of the fascicles. Unlike in polymyositis, the inflammatory cells are localized in the perivascular area and in the perimysial connective tissue and not in the endomysium. Microvascular changes are also common. Similarly to polymyositis, in IBM inflam­matory cells are located in the endomysium. Patients with polymyositis, dermatomyositis, and IBM develop symmetric proximal muscle weakness. Muscle biopsy shows myositis. Patients also have elevated levels of serum creatine phosphokinase. Atypical EMG findings are also seen. In patients with dermatomyositis, there is also a characteristic skin involvement in the form of heliotrope exanthema or Gottron’s papules on the knuckles.