Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_1002_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
26 Мб
Скачать
228
28. Kimura W, Nagai H.Study of surgical anatomy for duodenum-preserving resection of the head of the pancreas. Ann Surg. 1995;221(4):359–63.
29. Nelson L, Moon RC, Teixeira AF, Galvão M, Ramos A, Jawad MA.Safety and effectiveness of single anastomosis duodenal switch procedure: preliminary result from a single institution. Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2016;29(Suppl 1):80–4.
30. Lee-Bion A Jr, Menahem B, Le Roux Y, Contival N.Single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass­sleeve gastrectomy: surgical technique. J Visc Surg. 2019;156(4):343–7.
31. Gebelli JP, Gordejuela AGR, Ramos AC, Nora M, Pereira AM, Campos JM, Ramos MG, Bastos ELS, Marchesini JB.SADI-S with right gastric artery ligation: technical systematiza­tion and early results. Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2016;29(Suppl 1):85–90.
32. Finno P, Osorio J, García-Ruiz-de-Gordejuela A, Casajoana A, Sorribas M, Admella V, Serrano M, Marchesini JB, Ramos AC, Gebellí JP. Single versus double-anastomosis duo­denal switch: single-site comparative cohort study in 440 consecutive patients. Obes Surg. 2020;30(9):3309–16.
33. Tacchino RM.Bowel length: measurement, predictors, and impact on bariatric and metabolic surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11(2):328–34.
34. Whitington PF, Emond JC, Whitington SH, Broelsch CE, Baker AL.Small-bowel length and the dose of cyclosporine in children after liver transplantation. N Engl J Med. 1990;322(11):733–8.
A. C. Ramos and E. L. D. S. Bastos
Chapter 23
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Robotic Duodenal Switch andSADI-S: Technical Aspects
AaronBornstein andAndreTeixeira
23.1 Introduction
As the incidence of morbid obesity continues to rise within the United States and throughout the world, bariatric surgery offers the most effective and durable solu­tion to combat this ongoing epidemic. While the sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-y gastric bypass comprise the most popular weight loss options, the biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BDP/DS or duodenal switch) and single anastomo­sis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) are the most effective weight loss surgeries available. The duodenal switch and SADI-S offer the greatest magnitude of excess weight loss (EWL) and the most signicant improvement and resolution of comorbid conditions, in particular type II diabetes and hyperlipidemia. However, despite their superior weight loss and comorbidity resolution, duodenal switch operations typically account for less than 5% of the bariatric surgeries per­formed worldwide. This is likely due to a combination of factors: patient selection, fear of long-term nutritional complications, and, most importantly, the technical skills required to perform the operation safely. The ability to perform this procedure using the robotic platform eases the technical demands of the operation allowing bariatric surgeons to more freely offer this surgical option [15].
A. Bornstein (*) Department of General and Bariatric Surgery, SSM Health St. Clare Hospital, St. Louis, MO, USA e-mail: aaron.bornstein@ssmhealth.com
A. Teixeira Department of Bariatric Surgery, Orlando Regional Medical Center, Orlando, FL, USA e-mail: andre.teixeira@orlandohealth.com
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023 A. Teixeira et al. (eds.), Duodenal Switch and Its Derivatives in Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25828-2_23
229
230
The robotic platform has several advantages from a technical standpoint when compared to standard laparoscopy: improved visualization, improved ergonomics, more precise dissection, and dexterity of the wristed instruments. These advantages allow surgeons to perform more complex operations in a minimally invasive man­ner. For the BPD/DS and SADI-S, the 3D visualization and dexterity of the robotic arms give the surgeon more control when dissecting around the duodenum and the ability to more easily perform all the anastomoses in a hand-sewn manner. Also, the improved angulation of the robotic stapler, as opposed to the laparoscopic stapler, allows the surgeon to create the sleeve gastrectomy and transect the duodenum with ease. This chapter will be dedicated to the technical aspects involved in performing these two operations using the robotic platform [68].
A. Bornstein and A. Teixeira
23.2 Biliopancreatic Diversion withDuodenal Switch
23.2.1 Patient Positioning andPort Placement
The patient is placed in the standard supine position with both arms out at right angles on padded arm boards. A footboard is used, and a padded belt is placed across the lower extremities to secure the patient to the table. Peritoneal access is obtained using either a Veress needle followed by an optical trocar or optical 5mm laparoscopic trocar in the left mid-abdomen near the mid-clavicular line. A 0° lapa­roscopic scope is used when accessing the abdominal cavity using either approach and then exchanged for the 30° laparoscopic camera to place the remaining trocars. The trocars are placed in a smile shape across the abdomen: 8mm right anterior axillary line a few ngerbreadths below the inferior edge of the liver, 12mm right mid-clavicular line near the level of the umbilicus, 8mm supraumbilical midline, 12mm left mid-clavicular line near the level of the umbilicus, and 8mm left ante­rior axillary line a few ngerbreadths beneath the ribs. The liver is then retracted toward the anterior abdominal wall. This can be done in several different ways at the discretion of the surgeon; routinely, I will place a 5mm subxiphoid trocar and place a laparoscopic toothed Alice grasper at the superior aspect of the hiatus, thus retract­ing the liver off of the stomach. Alternatively, a full length 2–0 Ethibond suture placed through the superior aspect of the hiatus and brought out through the abdom­inal wall on either side of the falciform ligament also works very well.
After the liver has been retracted, I run the bowel laparoscopically starting at the terminal ileum to a point roughly 250cm proximally, and a suture is placed in the mesentery to mark this point. The suture is also brought through the superior por­tion of the greater omentum which prevents the bowel from falling down into the pelvis. This can also be done robotically depending on surgeon preference. A mark­ing pen is used to mark the bowel proximal to the suture in order to ensure no twist­ing of the mesentery when the bowel is brought up to the duodenum for the anastomosis. Once the suture is placed and bowel marked, the patient is placed in
23 Robotic Duodenal Switch andSADI-S: Technical Aspects
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
231
10–15° reverse Trendelenburg, and the robot is brought in from the patient’s left side for docking. The instruments used for a duodenal switch from the patient’s right to left side are as follows: fenestrated bipolar grasper, assistant trocar/robotic 60mm SureForm stapler, 30° robotic camera, vessel sealer/robotic monopolar scis­sor/large needle driver, and tip-up grasper or cadiere. After the robot is docked, I begin with the duodenal dissection.
23.2.2 Duodenal Dissection
Beginning along the greater curvature of the pre-pyloric antrum, a plane is created between the antrum anteriorly and the pancreas posteriorly using the vessel sealer and the fenestrated bipolar grasper. The distal antrum is retracted anteriorly using either a cadiere or tip-up grasper. This plane is continued down to the duodenum, and a retro-duodenal tunnel is created in order to ensure a 1–2cm cuff of mobilized duodenum. It is important not to be overly aggressive during the retroduodenal dis­section which could lead to duodenal stump ischemia and subsequent stump blow­out or injury to the gastroduodenal artery posterior to the duodenal bulb which could lead to signicant hemorrhage. Once the retroduodenal tunnel is completed, a Penrose drain is placed through the tunnel in order to facilitate placement of the stapler during the transaction of the duodenum. Following the completion of the sleeve gastrectomy, the robotic stapler will be used to transect the duodenum at least 1cm distal to the pylorus. However, I do not transect the duodenum until after the sleeve gastrectomy portion of the procedure has been completed. It is easiest to bring the stapler in through the left mid-clavicular 12mm trocar as opposed to the right mid-clavicular site. I prefer to place the anvil side of the stapler through the retroduodenal tunnel given its thinner prole. The previously placed Penrose drain is retracted anteriorly to better expose the retroduodenal tunnel and ensure appropri­ate placement of the stapling device. Once the stapler has been placed, the Penrose drain is removed to ensure it is not incorporated within the staple line. I prefer to use a white load cartridge, but a blue load is perfectly acceptable when transecting the duodenum. I do not routinely oversew or reinforce the staple line of the duodenum.
23.2.3 Sleeve Gastrectomy
Starting along the greater curvature of the body of the stomach, the lesser sac is entered by dividing the branches of the gastroepiploic arcade using the vessel sealer. The dissection is then carried cephalad along the greater curvature up to the angle of His ensuring that the left crus is clearly identied, no redundant fundus is present posteriorly, and no evidence of a hiatal hernia exists. The inferior portion of the greater curvature dissection is then completed ensuring that a few arcade vessels
232
remain between the duodenal dissection plane and the greater curvature dissection to help avoid any ischemic complications as it relates to the duodeno-ileal anasto­mosis. After the dissection is completed, the calibration tube is advanced into the stomach with the assistance of the anesthesia provider and positioned along the lesser curvature of the stomach with the tip of the calibration tube in the antrum. The calibration tube is then placed on suction to help maintain its position within the stomach. The SureForm robotic 60mm stapling device, brought in through the right mid-clavicular trocar, is used to create the sleeve gastrectomy starting with a green load cartridge at the antrum followed by blue loads for the remainder of the gastric sleeve. It is important to note that the overall size of the sleeve gastrectomy created for a duodenal switch is slightly larger than that made for patients who undergo sleeve gastrectomy alone. This is done to help limit any risk for postoperative dys­phagia or oral intolerance.
A. Bornstein and A. Teixeira
23.2.4 Duodeno-Ileostomy
After the sleeve gastrectomy and duodenal transection have been completed, the suture used to mark the small bowel is located, the loop of the small bowel is brought up to the duodenum in an antecolic fashion, and a posterior suture line is created between the ileum and the duodenum using a suture of your choice; I prefer a 3–0 PDS or Stratax. For those surgeons who prefer a double-layer anastomosis, this suture will be carried around anteriorly after the inner layer has been completed. Generous enterotomies are created in both the duodenum and ileum using the robotic scissors ensuring that the anastomosis is wide, so as to avoid any concerns for anastomotic stricture. The enterotomies are sutured together using a 2–0 or 3–0 suture, commonly Vicryl. The suture used to create the posterior suture line is then brought anteriorly creating a two-layer anastomosis.
23.2.5 Ileoileostomy
After the duodeno-ileostomy (DI) has been created, attention is then turned to creat­ing the ileoileostomy. This begins by transection of the small bowel just proximal to the DI anastomosis using a white or blue load of the robotic stapler; this will serve as the biliopancreatic (BP) limb of the anastomosis. During this portion of the oper­ation, the robotic stapler is typically brought in through the left mid-clavicular 12mm trocar. Alternatively, a small window in the small bowel mesentery can be made using the robotic scissors and the stapler brought in via the right mid- clavicular 12mm trocar. The small bowel is then counted 125cm distal to the DI anastomosis and sewn to the distal BP limb in order to approximate the bowel loops needed to create the ileoileostomy. The approximated small bowel is then retracted toward the right upper quadrant to allow space for the robotic stapler to enter through the
23 Robotic Duodenal Switch andSADI-S: Technical Aspects
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
left- sided 12mm trocar to perform the anastomosis. Enterotomies are created in both the biliopancreatic and Roux limbs using robotic scissors. Using a white load of the robotic stapler, the anastomosis is created. The common enterotomy is closed in one or two layers depending on surgeon preference. I typically prefer to close the enterotomy in a single layer with a 3–0 PDS or Stratax suture in a running fashion. Once the common enterotomy has been closed, it is time to address the mesenteric defects.
233
23.2.6 Hernia Defects
There are two hernia defects created during this procedure: Peterson’s defect made from the antecolic DI anastomosis and the mesenteric defect from the ileoileostomy anastomosis. I do not routinely close Peterson’s defect after a duodenal switch; however, I will close the mesenteric defect. I typically close this defect with a run­ning 3–0 PDS or Stratax suture. I bring this suture onto the bowel as well to help avoid any kinking of the ileoileostomy. The use of absorbable or permanent suture for closure of the mesenteric defect is dependent on surgeon preference.
23.2.7 Anastomotic/Staple Line Leak Test
I typically test my DI anastomosis and gastric sleeve staple line with a combination of methylene blue dye administered via the calibration tube followed by air insuf­ation. For those who are concerned about the potential for anaphylaxis to the blue dye, air insufation with 1L per minute via the calibration tube is also adequate after the gastric staple line and DI anastomosis have been submerged in saline irri­gation. Another option is intraoperative endoscopy and air insufation leak test, but I nd this unnecessary and more time-consuming than the other previously men­tioned techniques. Next, I typically place a 19 Fr drain through the right lateral trocar site and place it in the subhepatic space near the duodenal dissection bed in order to monitor for postoperative duodenal stump leak and pancreatic leak. Lipase is sent from the drain on POD2 and the drain removed prior to discharge if normal.
23.3 Single Anastomosis Duodeno-Ileal Bypass
withSleeve Gastrectomy
The single anastomosis duodenal switch is a simple modication of the traditional switch. It was created in order to limit the risks of macronutrient deciencies and decrease the technical complexity of the duodenal switch, all while still achieving similar weight loss and resolution of comorbid conditions when compared to the
234
A. Bornstein and A. Teixeira
traditional duodenal switch. The length of the common channel can vary between surgeons but typically is 250–300cm, as opposed to the traditional duodenal switch which has a common channel length of 125–150cm. The technical aspects of the two procedures are identical with two exceptions: the ileoileostomy is not per­formed and, therefore, no mesenteric defects need to be closed [9].
23.4 Conclusion
The biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch and single anastomosis duodeno- ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy are the two most effective bariatric procedures with regard to overall weight loss and resolution of comorbid condi­tions. However, these operations are very technically demanding laparoscopically which has contributed to their limited use. The ability to employ the robotic plat­form to assist in these procedures gives the bariatric surgeon more control over the operation through better visualization, more precise dissection, and more ease when performing hand-sewn anastomosis. By approaching these operations in a stepwise manner, these complex bariatric procedures become less daunting and give the sur­geon the condence to offer their patients the full scope of weight loss procedures.
References
1. Nguyen NT, etal. The ASMBS textbook of bariatric surgery: Volume 1: Bariatric surgery.
NewYork: Springer; 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 1- 4939- 1206- 3_18.
2. SjostromL NK, Sjostrom CD, Karason K, Larsson B, Wedel H, etal. Effects of bariatric sur-
gery on mortality in Swedish obese subjects. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(8):741–52.
3. Prachard VN, Davee R, Already JC. Duodenal switch provides superior weight loss in the
super-obese (bmi>50kg/m2) compared with gastric bypass. Ann Surg. 2000;10:514–23.
4. Gracia JA, Martinez M, Elia M, Aguilella V, Royo P, Jimenez A, etal. Obesity surgery results
depending on technique performed: long-term outcome. Obes Surg. 2009;90:15.
5. Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, etal. Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-
analysis. JAMA. 2004;292:1724–37.
6. Van Koughnett JA, Jayaraman S, Eagleson R, Quan D, Wynsberghe AV, Schlachta C.Are there
advantages to robotic-assisted surgery over laparoscopy from the surgeon’s perspective? J
Robotic Surg. 2009;3:79–82.
7. Sudan R, Podolsky E.Totally robot-assisted biliary pancreatic diversion with duodenal switch:
single dock technique and technical outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:55–60.
8. Antanavicius G, Katsichtis T, Alswealmeen W, Assali M. Three hundred four robotically
assisted biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch operations with gradual robotic
approach implementation: short-term outcomes, complication prole, and lessons learned.
Obes Surg. 2020;30:3961–7.
9. Kallies K, Rogers AM.American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery updated state-
ment on single-anastomosis duodenal switch. SOARD. 2020;16:825–30.
Chapter 24
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Laparoscopic Biliopancreatic Diversion withDuodenal Switch: Surgical Technique
LaurentBiertho, LéonieBouvet-Bouchard, andPhilVourtzoumis
24.1 Introduction
Obesity is known as a multi-factorial, complex, chronic, and relapsing disease [1]. Although lifestyle changes remain a key factor in the treatment of obesity, bariatric surgery is considered as the only approach leading to signicant, long-term, bene­cial impact in patients with severe obesity. Several weight loss procedures are endorsed by medical and surgical societies, including “biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch” (BPD-DS), which is the subject of this chapter. The surgical principle of a biliary bypass goes back to 1923, as described by Mann and Williamson [2]. In 1973, Nicola Scopinaro adapted the technique to decrease caloric absorption by adding a distal gastrectomy and performed the rst biliopancreatic diversion [3]. The distal gastrectomy was necessary to decrease the risks of ulcers, but protein malabsorption, gastrointestinal side effects, and dumping syndrome were common. The technique was then modied in the late 1980s, to remove as much parietal cell located in the fundus and to increase the common channel length from 50cm to 100cm [4, 5]. This led to the creation of the BPD-DS, as we still know it (Fig.24.1). It was later adapted to the laparoscopic approach in 1999 [6] which led to dramatic reduction in peri-operative complication rates [7].
Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at
https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 3- 031- 25828- 2_24.
L. Biertho (*) · L. Bouvet-Bouchard · P. Vourtzoumis Department of Surgery, Institut Universitaire de cardiologie et pneumologie de Québec— Université Laval, Laval University, Quebec City, QC, Canada e-mail: Laurent.biertho@criucpq.ulaval.ca; leonie.bouvet-bouchard.med@ssss.gouv.qc.ca;
phil.vourtzoumis@mail.mcgill.ca
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023 A. Teixeira et al. (eds.), Duodenal Switch and Its Derivatives in Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25828-2_24
235
236
L. Biertho et al.
Fig. 24.1 Biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch
In short, the current BPD-DS technique we described in the present article includes three specic components. First, the sleeve gastrectomy provides some caloric restriction while decreasing acid production and accelerating gastric empty­ing. A 250-cm total alimentary limb is created to decrease caloric absorption. Finally, a 100-cm common channel is formed, where food bolus mixes with biliopancreatic
24 Laparoscopic Biliopancreatic Diversion withDuodenal Switch: Surgical Technique
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
237
juices, resulting in decreased protein and fat absorption and in a strong metabolic effect. Long-term outcomes, side effects, and complications have been described extensively in the literature [711], and we will focus this chapter on surgical tech­nique and peri-operative management.
24.2 Surgical Technique (Video 24.1)
24.2.1 Preoperative Evaluation
All bariatric patients are evaluated by a multidisciplinary team, including a bariatric surgeon, bariatric nurse, and dietician. Consultation with a dietician qualied in BPD-DS is of utmost importance to correct eating disorders and to educate patients on the recommended diet after BPD-DS (high-protein, very low-fat diet). Before surgery, a low-calorie, high-protein diet can also be used to decrease the size of the liver and the amount of intraperitoneal fat. A psychiatric or psychological evalua­tion is requested for patients with a history of mental health or when clinically indicated. Screening for diabetes, dyslipidemia, and obstructive sleep apnea is per­formed. These comorbidities are controlled prior to surgery, especially when mod­erate to severe sleep apnea is detected, and noninvasive positive pressure ventilation should be initiated before surgery.
Preoperative blood work consists of a complete blood cell count, liver enzymes, albumin, calcium, parathyroid hormone, vitamin D, vitamin A, vitamin B12, and iron panel. Preoperative nutritional deciencies should be detected and treatment initiated before surgery, to decrease the risks of poorly controlled deciencies in the postoperative period. In our practice, all patients receive a multivitamin complex that contains vitamin B1 (Centrum Forte©) and vitamin D3 supplementation (10,000U per day for 1month followed by 1000U per day until surgery) at least 3months before surgery.
24.2.2 Preparation andPatient Positioning
The patient is placed under general anesthesia and placed in the supine, split-leg position with both arms open (Fig.24.2). The surgeon stands between the patient’s legs, and the assistant to the left side, except for the sub-mesocolic part of the pro­cedure where they both are on the patient’s left side. Before the beginning of the surgery, appropriate antibiotic (cefazolin 2g IV for patients weighing 120kg and 3g for patients weighing >120kg) and deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis (hepa­rin 5000U SC 2hours before surgery) are given.