Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_980_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
28 Мб
Скачать
300
https://t.me/medicina_free
P. Motie et al.
and distal ends. CNN architecture was trained to evaluate the visibility and location of the piriform aperture’s inferior line, which is located lower than the normal side in the cleft side. In addition, it evaluated microdontia, un-eruption, missing teeth, and medial inclination of the affected side lateral incisor. This information was extracted to classify the input data into the mentioned subcategories. Despite the errors (Figs.1 and 2), the model can be a potential assistant for clinicians in the detection of CAs and classifying them in CAs with or without CPs [95].
3.1.5 Salivary Glands’ Pathology
Salivary glands’ inammation happens due to different conditions like salivary ow obstruction, infection, and diseases such as Sjögren’s syndrome (SjS). SjS is a chronic inammatory autoimmune disease of salivary glands with unknown origination [96]. The main cause of obstructive sialadenitis is sialoliths. Sometimes patients with sialoliths are asymptomatic and stones are accidentally discovered in panoramic images. Even in asymptomatic patients, early removal of the stones is necessary because it can increase the possibility of infection and atrophy. Sialoliths can be misdiagnosed with odontogenic tumors, osteosclerotic
Fig. 1 An equal level of the inferior piriform aperture lines on the affected and healthy sides and normal alignment of lateral incisors resulted in a CA case undetected [95]
Fig. 2 The model detected a normal case as CA (the red box). Radiopaque lines of the hard palate are superimposed on the inferior line of the piriform aperture lines on both sides. The canine may have been wrongly recognized as the congenitally missing lateral incisor [95]
Application of Articial Intelligence in Diagnosing Oral and Maxillofacial Lesions…
https://t.me/medicina_free
301
or cemental lesions, especially when it’s located in the mandible and overlaps with mandibular bony structures [97]; in addition, obstructive sialadenitis and SjS can have very similar symptoms; therefore, they should be deliberately dis­tinguished from each other. Kise etal. conducted a study for nding sialadenitis and SjS.They divided the training dataset into three groups: obstructive sialad­enitis, SjS, and the control group. Among these three groups, CNN achieved the highest performance in the identication of SjS with signicantly higher sensi­tivity than specialist radiologists (83% vs. 72%). Conversely, both DL systems and radiologists achieved noticeably low total accuracy and sensitivity in detect­ing obstructive sialadenitis. The main reason is that chronic sialadenitis manifes­tation dramatically varies based on the disease stage, making the lesion type prediction more complex and challenging. This study states that obstructive sial­adenitis should always be included in the differential diagnosis because it pres­ents a wide range of characteristics from normal to abnormal depending on its stage [98].
Parotid gland tumors account for a small portion of head and neck tumors and most of them are benign. Surgical planning of these tumors is signicantly depen­dent on the tumor histological type. Fine needle aspiration is often used for preop­erative diagnosis of tumor type; however, it is expensive and time-consuming. Also, the sampling process increases the risk of infection and the tumor local recurrence resulting from tumoral cells’ spreading. Nevertheless, utilizing a tech­nique that is able to detect the tumor nature and location from the imaging modali­ties would signicantly enhance the clinical practice effectiveness. A CNN model architecture (modied ResNet model) was trained by MRI images detecting sali­vary gland tumors and classifying them as benign or malignant lesions. The train­ing dataset was labeled as (1) pleomorphic adenoma, (2) Warthin tumor, (3) malignant tumor (adenocarcinoma), or (4) free of tumor. The model showed high performance in distinguishing between benign and malignant tumors; however, still, among benign tumors, the differentiation accuracy of pleomorphic adenoma and Warthin tumors was low (misidentication of Warthin tumors as being pleo­morphic adenomas). The reason might have been the low number of Warthin tumors in the dataset and the highly similar manifestations of different benign tumors. Another weak point of the model was that the tumor segmentation was done manually, so auto segmentation of the tumoral area can be considered in future designs [99].
302
https://t.me/medicina_free
Outcomes
Accuracy/sensitivity/
specicity
CNN is effective in
the diagnosis of
OA in panoramic
images
Accuracy=0.84,
sensitivity=0.54,
specicity=0.94
CNN has a great
potential to detect
CAs and classify
them
Model 1:
recall=71.1%,
precision=74.5%
F-measure=70.9%
Model 2:
CNN can
effectively show
recall=82.1%,
precision=84.0%
F-measure=81.8%
micro-AUC, 0.93
the type of parotid
gland tumor at the
slice level
CNN can improve
the performance of
Recall=85%,
precision=100%,
P. Motie et al.
detecting
submandibular
gland sialoliths
sensitivity than
specialists in
F-measure=91.9%
Accuracy=70.3% CNN has more
detecting SjS
images
No. of images
for testing Modality
1292 images Panoramic
Type of lesion
detected
Hard tissue/TMJ
osteoarthritis
The goal of the
study
CNN for
classication
TMJ
Deep learning
task
classication
Algorithm
architecture
VGG16 Detection
images
593 images Panoramic
Hard tissue/cleft
alveolus and cleft
osteoarthritis
severity
CNN for
classication of
classication
ResNet AUC=0.82
InceptionV3
DetectNet Detection
palate
alveolar cleft lip
MRI Accuracy, 82.18%;
233 patients,
3791 images
Soft tissue/salivary
gland tumors
(pleomorphic
adenoma, Warthin
CNN for
detection and
classication of
salivary gland
Detection
classication
Modied
ResNet18
images
224 images Panoramic
tumor, and
adenocarcinoma)
Soft tissue/
sialoliths of the
tumors
detection of
DetectNet Detection CNN for
submandibular
gland
salivary gland
stones
images
150 images Ultrasonography
Soft tissue/
inamed salivary
glands
CNN for
identication of
parenchymal
changes of SMGs
classication
VGG16 Detection
Author/
year
Kim
etal./2020
Kuwada
etal./2021
Xia
etal./2021
Ishibashi
etal./2021
Kise
etal./2021
Application of Articial Intelligence in Diagnosing Oral and Maxillofacial Lesions…
https://t.me/medicina_free
Outcomes
Deep learning
achieves the same
values of accuracy
and sensitivity
compared to
specialists
automatically
segment sinuses
and evaluate
volumetric
assessments of
sinus inammation
AUC than the
radiologists and
comparable
sensitivity and
specicity to the
radiologists
Accuracy/sensitivity/
specicity
Accuracy=87.5%,
sensitivity=86.7%,
specicity=88.3%,
AUC=0.875
AUC=0.93 CNN has higher
303
images
No. of images
for testing Modality
490 images Panoramic
Type of lesion
detected
Soft tissue/
inamed sinuses
The goal of the
study
Deep learning for
diagnosis of
maxillary
Deep learning
task
classication
Algorithm
architecture
AlexNet Detection
sinusitis
510 patients CT scans Rho=0.82, p<0.001 CNN can
Soft tissue/
inamed sinuses
segmentation of
sinus cavities and
calculation of
Tiramisu Segmentation CNN for
sinus
opacication
score
Waters
radiograph
15,000
patients
Soft tissue/
inamed sinuses
Deep learning for
diagnosis of
maxillary
sinusitis
Detection
classication
Residual
Net
Author/
year
Murata
etal./2018
Humphries
etal./2020
Kim
etal./2019
304
https://t.me/medicina_free
P. Motie et al.
3.1.6 Sinusitis
Sinusitis is one of the most prevalent health complaints, with an estimated 20 mil­lion physician visits annually in the USA.Sinusitis is mainly caused by recent upper respiratory viral infection, allergic rhinitis, and also adjacent odontogenic infection. About 30% of maxillary sinusitis cases can arise from odontogenic factors like peri­apical or periodontal lesions of the maxillary teeth [100]. CT is the preferred imag­ing modality for denite assessment of paranasal sinuses in a demanded anatomical detail. Conventional radiographies such as Waters’ and Caldwell’s view are often used for initial examination of maxillary sinusitis [101]. Mucosal thickening exceeding 4mm thickness, uid collection, and cyst-like appearance of mucus are the characteristic radiographic ndings, indicating sinusitis [75]. In 2019, DL was applied to diagnose maxillary sinusitis on 80,475 Waters’ view radiographs, and its function was compared to that of the radiologists. The training and the validation dataset were labeled into four categories: normal, mucosal thickening (more than 4mm), visible air-uid level, and total opacication. Complicated cases like reten­tion cysts and images that couldn’t be labeled (i.e., the case showing sinus atelecta­sis) were excluded from the nal analysis. CT ndings were used as the reference standard in the test sets. In the testing process, most errors occurred when the model mistook the sinus bony wall with increased mucosal thickness and vice versa. Nevertheless, as the algorithm showed superior AUC and comparable sensitivity and specicity to those of radiologists, it might be helpful to be used as the “second reader” guiding inexperienced clinicians in sinusitis diagnosing and increasing the radiologists’ diagnostic consistency [102].
As was mentioned earlier, one of the reasons for maxillary sinusitis is the odon­togenic and periodontal infection of the maxillary posterior region teeth. On the other hand, most of the patients note a dental visit a month before the manifestation of the clinical symptoms, which means that a recent dental procedure might also be associated with odontogenic maxillary sinusitis (ODMS). Maxillary dental pain is reported in nearly one-third of patients with true rhinosinusitis. Cheek pain and discharge of purulent in the oral cavity are also counted as the common symptoms of ODMS [103]. Therefore, a signicant portion of sinusitis patients primarily visit a dentist, and panoramic radiography is the rst-order imaging modality for these patients. Accurate diagnosis of maxillary sinusitis on panoramic radiographies is challenging because anatomical structures near the sinuses, such as the hard palate and oor of the nasal cavity, can be overlapped on the sinus image. To support inex­perienced observers, a learning model was created using panoramic radiographs of healthy and inamed sinuses. More than 4mm mucosal thickness, uid accumula­tion, and/or a cyst-like appearance of mucous extending beyond one-third of the maxillary sinus were dened as sinusitis. Square regions of interest, including uni­lateral sinuses, were set and cropped out from the images (Fig. 3). Radiologists often recognize an inamed sinus by comparing it to the contralateral healthy sinus; however, the present model can sufciently diagnose the presence of inammation in single sinuses. This provides additional diagnostic support for inexperienced resi­dents, especially in cases with bilateral inamed sinuses or when both sinuses are healthy [75].
Application of Articial Intelligence in Diagnosing Oral and Maxillofacial Lesions…
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 3 Segmentation and cropping out the ROI (200*200 pixels) from both sides. (Reprint with permission from [75])
305
3.2 Implementation ofAI forOral andMaxillofacial
Corrective Surgeries
3.2.1 Orthognathic Surgeries
Orthognathic surgeries are often used to correct hard and soft tissue deformities and discrepancies that cannot be treated by conventional orthodontic treatments. The objective of orthognathic treatment is to use a combination of orthodontic and surgi­cal treatments to correct the dentofacial deformities concerning aesthetics and func­tion [104]. Recent advancements in digital radiographic imagery and photographs, especially the intraoral scanners, and also real-life demands from practitioners such as reconstruction, tridimensional morphometrics, automated treatment planning, and customized surgical setup planning in the management of orthognathic cases, are guiding the trends toward the use of AI in the context of orthognathic surgery procedures [105].
At the stage of diagnosis and treatment planning, either facial photographs or posteroanterior (PA) and lateral cephalograms are implemented to analyze the max­illofacial soft tissue and skeletal form, respectively, and thus investigate whether orthognathic surgery is needed or not. Based on soft tissue judgments, a CNN model was able to classify frontal and right prole photographs of patients with 89% accu­racy based on whether they required orthognathic surgery or not. In this model, after extracting feature maps from the frontal and lateral photographs by the backbone network, the global pooling layer vectorizes these high-level feature maps. This layer is a new replacement for the previous classier layers, sacrices less time for the calculation process, and doesn’t need xed input dimensions. Finally, the visu­alization map is created by the VisualBackProp method, highlighting the lips, chin, and teeth. Considering these sites, CNN will then predict the need for orthognathic surgery [106]. Another prediction of orthognathic surgery necessity was held by a DL model using lateral and PA cephalograms. In this study, two CNN models extracted the features from the posteroanterior and lateral cephalograms. A global average pooling (GAP) embedded the feature maps of the last convolution layers as a vector. To trace how the model inferences the images, relevant areas within each image mainly used for decision-making were visualized by feature visualization.
306
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 4 Feature map visualization highlighting the teeth and maxillofacial area [107]
P. Motie et al.
Figure4 shows the color-coded images showing the areas with high or low impact on this process. Similar to the surgeons, orthodontists, and radiologists, the imple­mented model determined the need for orthognathic surgery by focusing on the teeth and the maxillofacial regions with relative accuracy and thus can be used as an effective screening tool to predict the need for orthognathic surgery for both the patient and the maxillofacial surgeon/dentist [107].
In conventional surgical planning, a two-dimensional treatment plan is created after facial photographs and cephalometric analysis; in the next step, model surgery is performed by mounting the dental casts on an articulator using facebow records, and a surgical splint is then fabricated to guide the surgeon during the operation. Recent improvements in three-dimensional imaging methods, such as CBCT, facial scanning, and digital dental casts, have developed the utilization of three-dimen­sional virtual surgical planning (VSP) for orthognathic surgeries and the manufac­ture of surgical splints using CAD/CAM technology [108]. These virtual plannings are accessible in a web-based workow and the operating room, giving the chance to conduct the surgical plan with the attendance of the therapist team, including the maxillofacial surgeons and orthodontists. They also make it possible to run a user­dened 3D anthropometric analysis providing quantied information on the defor­mity. Using virtual surgical planning software enhanced by machine learning, simulation of the surgical processes such as the osteotomies of the skeletal struc­tures and repositioning of the segments would be possible, thus predicting the surgi­cal results, including the expected dental and skeletal movements. These simulations are executed through the use of 3D composite models. Such applications like the Mimics (Materialise N.V., Leuven, Belgium) receive DICOM data from computed tomography (CT), micro CT, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), confocal micros­copy, X-ray, and ultrasound. After reorienting input images, the anatomical struc­tures (either hard tissue or soft tissue) are then segmented. Finally, all necessary information from the region of interest (ROI) of the segmented images is gathered by superimposition or registration to create 3D models [109].We can also use these simulations to train the residents and educate the patients. In comparison to the conventional model surgery, this method saves up a signicant amount of time, increases the surgical procedure accuracy, and makes the process notably simple and effective [109, 110]. In addition, 3D digital treatment planning software allow the practitioners to visualize diagrams of each therapeutic approach and the nal result of each intervention. Clinicians can use the visualized diagrams to explain the
Application of Articial Intelligence in Diagnosing Oral and Maxillofacial Lesions…
https://t.me/medicina_free
307
procedure to the patients and enhance their understanding of the protocol. It also helps dialogue and planning where there is a multidisciplinary approach (ENT, gen­eral dentist, sleep specialist) [105]. The Dolphin “Treat” tool is another application designed for comprehensive surgical planning. The app receives the patients’ PA or lateral cephalograms or their submento-vertex (SMV) views as inputs and provides the users the access to numerous pre-designed plans by surgeons and researchers worldwide.
1
The outcome of orthognathic surgeries is affected by the long-term orthodontic treatment phase as well as the short-term surgical procedure. In addition, numerous interdependent variables such as bony structures, occlusion, periodontal health, oro­facial functions, and aesthetics should be noticed when the treatment plan is con­structed. A thorough understanding of surface aesthetics changes based on the planned movements of the bones is also essential; however, the soft tissue analysis is almost entirely clinical and subjective depending on the clinician’s experience and artistic sense. The results of these assessments usually tend to be imprecise and difcult to reproduce. One way to overcome these issues is to record 3D facial topography. This type of data contains more information than 2D data, and it can be utilized for creating a posttreatment facial shape predicting system [105, 111, 112]. Landmark-based geometric morphometric methods (GMMs) and DL are two avail­able machine learning methods that are related to 3D prediction. By GMM, we would be able to systematically map the morphology within a “morphospace” using homologous landmarks. Using a combination of DL and a GMM, Tanikawa etal. developed an articial intelligence system that predicts the 3D facial shape after orthodontic treatment and orthognathic surgery. In orthognathic surgeries, there is a nonlinear relationship between hard and soft tissue movements along with changes in different soft tissue sites. For instance, it has been shown that the changes in the malar-midfacial region after the maxillary advancement in LeFort I osteotomy are more pronounced than in the upper lip’s [113]. Therefore, the model was designed based on the nonlinear ratios between soft tissue changes and its underlying hard tissue. This simulated software not only was accurate enough to be utilized in clini­cal application but also is applicable in predicting any other 3D shapes after opera­tions, i.e., antiaging surgery, cancer surgery, and cosmetic surgery; however, since the records were gathered from surgeries performed in two hospitals, the model may only mimic the treatment outcomes of these facilities, and its generalizability is unclear [111].
The correction of the skeletal and soft tissue deformities includes manipulating the present anatomical structures. Putting together every single change made during surgical and orthodontic procedures results in the nal treatment outcome. To evalu­ate growth or treatment-related changes taking place between two time points, superimposition techniques are commonly used. For instance, either lateral cepha­lograms or dental casts have been used in orthodontics to assess the tooth and jaw movements during orthodontic treatments [114]. The development of intraoral scanners and new imaging techniques such as CBCT replaced the dental casts and
1
https://www.dolphinimaging.com/.
308
https://t.me/medicina_free
P. Motie et al.
lateral cephalograms with digital 3D models [115]. Since AI has made it possible to superimpose various digital images, it can be considered as a well-suited tool to monitor and handle the treatment follow-ups and also gives the opportunity to quan­tify and visualize the effects of the treatment on maxillofacial structures [105].
3.2.2 Rhinoplasty
Rhinoplasty is one of the most popular cosmetic interventions performed by sur­geons. The aim of this operation is usually aesthetic improvements and/or correc­tion of breathing problems by changing the osteocartilaginous architecture [116]. From the aesthetic point of view, the length of the nose should be equivalent to the height of the forehead and lower face, and the nasal width (from ala to ala) should be equal to the intercanthal distance. Plastic surgeons strive to achieve these propor­tions as well as keep a natural-looking appearance. In Borsting etal.’s study, before and after patient photographs were used to train a DL model to predict whether the patient has undergone rhinoplasty surgery or not. Compared to traditional machine learning methods, DL would be a well-adopted tool to assess plastic surgery proce­dures since it can be trained by real-world photographs taken by nonspecialized equipment such as mobile phone cameras. The model’s accuracy and precision were almost similar to that of the experts. This highly accurate DL model was further deployed as a mobile application making it accessible enough for surgeons, young residents, and trainers so it can be utilized in telemedicine consultations via elec­tronic communication; it also can be helpful in the management of cases having uncertain medical histories. Finally, the app would benet surgical trainers for edu­cational purposes as it allows them to observe several rhinoplasties in a large group of patients [117].
Today antiaging effects of rhinoplasty are not hidden to anyone. Many of the aging nose characteristic features would be manipulated and guided toward rejuve­nation during a successful rhinoplasty surgery. An AI algorithm was used to qualify these antiaging effects objectively. The model could successfully analyze the photo­graphic inputs taken from the frontal view of patients in a natural position (Fig.5); it also could evaluate the eyes and lips in a standard position by resizing and crop­ping images. This would rule out the effect of mood and self-perception on age evaluation, which is typically visible through facial expressions such as “smiling” and “frowning” [118].
Osteotomies would be needed in some rhinoplasty cases such as deviated, hunch­back noses with nasal bridge and/or a wide base. This technique should be con­ducted carefully since the osteotomy-related complications can cause permanent deformities in the patient, however, currently, the technique is entirely dependent on the surgeon’s tactile sense and hearing capabilities, and there is a lack of the sur­geon’s direct vision and access as it is often performed through minimally invasive subcutaneous approach to limit the remaining scars. A support vector machine (SVM) classication algorithm was developed and combined with an instrumental hammer to predict the bone tissue condition around the osteotome tip. SVM is a machine learning-based algorithm that creates hyperplanes to classify the dataset into different groups. These hyperplanes are optimized to yield prediction areas so
BF
cd
Application of Articial Intelligence in Diagnosing Oral and Maxillofacial Lesions…
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 5 Preoperatively, the ranking convolutional neural network software detects the patient as 24years old. Six months postoperatively, this same patient is detected as 22years old. (Reprint with permission from [118])
309
ab
B2F F2 2FB2B
Fig. 6 Schematic illustration of the different groups of impacts on the osteotome (light gray) in the bone tissue (dark gray) and fractures (white). (a) Bone to bone (B2B), (b) bone to fracture (B2F), (c) fracture to bone (F2B), (d) fracture to fracture (F2F). The group of each bone-osteotome system is indicated for each conguration. (Reprint with permission from [116])
that it is possible to separate the points of different classes from a dataset. Here the impacts were classied into four groups based on the bone-osteotome system (BOS) state (Fig.6), and the model was applied to predict the BOS status (i.e., the presence or absence of fracture around the osteotome tip) after each impact. This would help the surgeon determine the osteotome pathway and force, thus preventing uncon­trolled fractures and alerting the arrival to the frontal bone, which should be the end of the osteotome pathway [116].