Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3727_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
29 Мб
Скачать
324 Chapter 32 Diagnostic algorithm for chronic venous disorders
https://t.me/med1917
32.6 RADIOLOGIC IMAGING
Venous outow obstruction can play a key role in contrib­uting to the pathophysiology and symptom complex of initial-onset and recurrent varicose veins and more com­monly in venous ulceration. Increased resistance to venous outow in combination with valvular incompetence can be responsible for the recalcitrant ulcer. Computed tomog­raphy (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the venous system can conrm the presence of venous obstruc­tion (see Chapter 16). necessary for optimal evaluation of venous disorders when using CT. Large zones of the body can be imaged in a short period of time. However, ow artifacts can occur if homo­geneous mixing does not occur between the blood and con­trast. This is less true for the lower extremities compared to the large central veins in the thorax.
The most common compression syndrome is iliac vein compression syndrome (previously May-Thurner syn­drome). Cross-sectional imaging can provide accurate mea­surements of the degree of venous compression, though some concern exists regarding whether the requisite supine patient positioning during these studies reects normal physiology. is compressed by the right common iliac artery, though symptomatic compression of right-sided, external, or inter­nal iliac veins may also occur. tional imaging can reveal other causes of compression, such as pelvic masses, bone spurs, iliac artery aneurysms, retroperitoneal brosis, and inammatory processes. Each modality can also be useful for making the diagnosis of acute venous thrombosis and provide an accurate picture of overall clot burden, particularly in certain circumstances when the duplex examination is limited, such as in the presence of large wounds, morbid obesity, and marked interstitial edema. MRI remains a better imaging modality if orthopedic hardware is present.
38,39
Most commonly, the left common iliac vein
35–37
Intravenous contrast is usually
40,41
Furthermore, cross-sec-
32.7 INVASIVE IMAGING
visualization of the deep veins with this technique, the use of a tilt-table, Valsalva maneuver, and manual compression of the thigh may be helpful. Manual contrast injection in 10- to 20-mL boluses is preferred, rather than the use of a power injector. Retrograde transit of contrast without the visualization of valves highlights the incompetent veins and can be very helpful when contemplating possible treat­ments such as valve reconstruction or auto-transplantation.
Other salient points in optimizing the diagnostic poten­tial of venography include using selective and super-selec­tive cannulation of venous tributaries to provide better venous lling, maximizing valve closure by keeping the patient supine when performing retrograde cannulation (ipsilateral or contralateral), and using larger amounts of contrast over longer periods of injection time. Multiple planar views at 90-degree obliquities (e.g., 45-degree left anterior oblique versus 45-degree right anterior oblique) can help further reveal a venous stenosis that is not appre­ciated fully on a typical anterior-posterior image. When using a power injector for larger vein visualization, venous trauma can be avoided by using multiple side-hole cathe­ters and decreasing the injection pressure to approximately half that of arterial injections (200–400 pounds/inch).
32.7.2 Intravascular ultrasound
Despite the use of multiplanar projections with contrast venography, venous obstruction may be difcult to fully dene. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) has become the criterion standard for investigation of obstructive venous pathology. These include the various forms of iliac vein compression syndrome, external compression, scarring, synechiae, congenital abnormalities, and residual chronic thrombus (see Chapter 15). IVUS provides an accurate cross-sectional representation of pathology and may be more accurate than multiplanar venography and CT to denitively specify where lesions begin and end as well as measure diameters and areas. vide more accurate evaluation after intervention.
44,45
Similarly, IVUS can pro-
32.7.1 Contrast venography
Contrast venography remains vital to providing an accu­rate evaluation of venous anatomy, reux, and obstruction (see Chapter 14). Detailed descriptions of ascending and descending venography are beyond the scope of this dis­cussion, though the techniques described by Rabinov and
42
Paulin tively.
for dening venous outow obstruction. Venipuncture of a foot vein, popliteal vein, femoral vein, or common femoral vein is selected based on information from previous stud­ies. This technique allows both diagnostic evaluation and the potential for endovascular treatments. Insufation of a tourniquet on the calf can assist in lling the deep veins of the lower extremity if performing ascending venography from the injection of a foot vein.
tomic pattern of valvular reux and function. To maximize
and Kistner43 serve as thorough overviews, respec-
Ascending venography remains a primary technique
Descending venography allows denition of the ana-
32.8 DIAGNOSTIC ALGORITHMS
Evaluation of the patient presenting with one or multiple signs of CVD requires a thorough assessment to dene the underlying etiology and direct appropriate medical and/ or invasive treatments. Performing a thorough history and physical exam is the critical starting point to form a differ­ential diagnosis and guide next steps for diagnostic testing. Next, duplex ultrasonography can provide information regarding patency and competence of the deep and super­cial venous systems, as well as some hints as to whether obstruction may be present. For some patients, this pro­vides sufcient information to correctly diagnose and treat the underlying pathology, while more complex patient pre­sentations may require further evaluation. Duplex can also evaluate perforator veins and pelvic veins, vital for patients presenting with advanced (C5/6/6r) disease or whose symptom severity is not well-explained by ndings of a standard lower extremity duplex exam. Indirect noninva­sive tests are utilized less commonly than duplex in modern
References 325
https://t.me/med1917
practice but may give valuable information when standard duplex evaluation is not well tolerated (e.g., in the setting of ulcers or severe pain) or is inconclusive. Finally, either cross-sectional truncal imaging by CT or MRI and/or con­trast venography with IVUS may be needed to evaluate for compressive or occlusive venous pathology.
These diagnostic tests and imaging studies help the providers and team with directing treatment, predicting prognosis, and providing a baseline for comparison during follow-up. The algorithm presented (Figure 32.1) is designed to help the health care professional provide complete care
Paent presents with concern for
Perform complete history
and physical examinaon
Consistent with
lymphedema component
Consistent with venous
pathology
of these problems and further ensure that more signicant underlying venous pathophysiology is addressed. Additional pathology such as lymphedema and venous malformations may overlap with CVD; thus, the algorithm should not be an either/or decision but one that takes into account other con­comitant etiologies. While resources and treatment options can vary depending on the health care delivery system, the algorithm emphasizes diagnostic options in a logical order to provide a thorough and timely diagnosis. Lastly, the per­tinent guideline from the 2022 SVS, AVF, and AVLS Guide­lines for CVD has been provided.
9
CVD
Overlap with chronic pain
syndromes, restless legs,
etc.
32
Perform venous
Proceed with evaluaon
for lymphedema
duplex examinaon
Proceed with evaluaon
for chronic pain syndromes,
restless leg, etc.
Consider addional
indirect noninvasive tests
Consider cross-seconal imaging or invasive tests
32.1 The suggested algorithm for the diagnosis of CVD may vary depending on presentation, history, and physical examination.
Multiple diagnostic options and modalities exist and should follow this prescribed order, depending on the initial constellation of signs and symptoms. As determined by ndings, treatment can commence at any stage after complete history and physical exam­ination.
REFERENCES
• Randomized controlled trial * Systematic review
or meta-analysis Clinical practice guideline or
reporting standards
1. Beebe-Dimmer JL, Pfeifer JR, Engle JS, Schottenfeld D. The epidemiology of chronic venous insufciency and varicose veins. Ann Epidemiol. 2005 Mar;15(3):175–184.
2. Rabe E, Guex JJ, Puskas A, Scuderi A, Fernandez Quesada F. Epidemiology of
chronic venous disorders in geographically diverse populations: Results from the vein consult program. Int Angiol. 2012 Apr; 31(2):105–115. PMID: 22466974
3. Robertson L, Lee AJ, Evans CJ, Boghossian S, Allan PL, Ruckley CV, Fowkes FGR. Incidence of chronic venous disease in the Edinburgh Vein Study. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2013 Jan;1(1):59–67.
4. Lurie F, Passman M, Meisner M, Dalsing M, Masuda E, Welch H, et al. The 2020 update of the CEAP classication system and reporting standards. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2020 May;8(3):342–352.
5. Murad MH, Montori VM, Sidawy AN, Ascher E, Meissner MH, Chaikof EL, Gloviczki P. Guideline methodology of the society for vascular surgery including the experience with the GRADE framework. J Vasc Surg. 2011;53:1375–1380.
6. Guyatt G, Gutterman D, Bauman MH, et al. Grading strength of recommendations and quality of evidence in clinical guide­lines: Report from an American college of chest physicians task force. Chest. 2006;129:174–181.
7. O’Donnell TF, Jr, Passman MA, Marston WA, et al. Society for vascular surgery, american venous forum. Management of
326 Chapter 32 Diagnostic algorithm for chronic venous disorders
https://t.me/med1917
venous leg ulcers: Clinical practice guide­lines of the Society for Vascular Surgery and the American Venous Forum. J Vasc Surg. 2014;60(2 Suppl.):3S–59S.
8. Rathbun S, Norris A, Morrison N, et
al. Performance of endovenous foam sclerotherapy in the USA for the treatment of venous disorders: ACP/SVM/AVF/SIR quality improvement guidelines. Phlebo­logy. 2014;29:76–82.
9. Gloviczki P, Lawrence PF, Wasan SM,
Meissner MH, Almeida J, Brown KR, et al. The 2022 Society for Vascular Surgery, American Venous Forum, and Ameri­can Vein and Lymphatic Society clinical practice guidelines for the management of varicose veins of the lower extremities. Part I. Duplex scanning and treatment of supercial truncal reux: Endorsed by the society for vascular medicine and the international union of phlebology. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2023 Mar;11(2):231–261, e6.
10. Bradbury AW, Evans CJ, Allan PL, Lee A, Vaughan Ruckley C, Fowkes FGR. What are the symptoms of varicose veins? Edin­burgh Vein Study cross sectional popula­tion survey. BMJ. 1999;318:353–356.
11. Langer RD, Ho E, Denenberg JO, et al. Relationships between symptoms and venous disease: The San Diego population study. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165: 1420–1424.
12. Eberhardt RT, Raffetto JD. Chronic venous insufciency. Circulation. 2014 Jul 22;130(4):333–346.
13. Uhl JF, Cornu-Thenard A, Satger B, Carpentier PH. Clinical analysis of the corona phlebectatica. J Vasc Surg. 2012 Jan;55(1):150–153. PMID: 21975063
14. Becker DJ, Dick MM. Saphenous varix bruit in tricuspid valve incompetence. N Engl J Med. 1962 Oct 11;267:766–768.
15. Darvall MA, Sam RC, Adam DJ, Silverman SH, Fegan CD, Bradbury AW. Higher prevalence of thrombophilia in patients with varicose veins and venous ulcers than controls. J Vasc Surg. 2009;49:12335–
12341.
16. Brandt HR, de Lorenzo Messina MC, Hirayama JT, Belda W, Jr, Benabou JE, Criado PR. Prevalence of thrombophilia associated with leg ulcers. Br J Dermatol. 2009;160:202–203.
17. Calistru AM, Baudrier T, Gonvalves L, Azevedo F. Thrombophilia in venous leg ulcers: A comparative study in early and later onset. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2012;78:406.
*18. Tan MKH, Onida S, Laffan M, Davies AH.
Thrombophilia in non-thrombotic chronic venous disease of the lower limb—a systematic review. Br J Haematol. 2018 Dec;183(5):703–716.
19. Kalodiki E, Calahoras LS, Delis KT, Zouzias CP, Nicolaides AN. Air plethys­mography: The answer in detecting past deep venous thrombosis. J Vasc Surg. 2001;33:715–720.
20. Delis KT, Bjarnason H, Wennberg PW, Rooke TW, Gloviczki P. Successful iliac vein and inferior vena cava stenting ameliorates venous claudication and improves venous outow, calf muscle pump function, and clinical status in post-thrombotic syndrome. Ann Surg. 2007;245(1):130–139.
21. Nicolaides AN, Miles C. Photoplethys­mography in the assessment of venous insufciency. J Vasc Surg. 1987;5:405–412.
22. Raju S, Lucas M, Thaggard D, Saleem T, Jayaraj A. Plethysmographic features of calf pump failure in chronic venous obstruction and reux. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2023 Mar;11(2): 262–269.
23. Welch HJ, Faliakou EC, McLaughlin RL, Umphrey SE, Belkin M, O’Donnell TF, Jr. Comparison of descending phlebography with quantitative photoplethysmogra­phy, air plethysmography, and duplex quantitative valve closure time in assessing deep venous reux. J Vasc Surg. 1992 Dec;16(6):913–919; discussion 919–920.
24. McEnroe CS, O’Donnell TF, Jr, Mackey WC. Correlation of clinical ndings with venous hemodynamics in 386 patients with chronic venous insufciency Am J Surg. 1988 Aug;156(2):148–152.
25. Hirai M, Yoshinaga M, Nakayama R. Assessment of venous insufciency using photoplethysmography: A comparison to strain gauge plethysmography. Angiology. 1985;36:795–801.
26. Perhoniemi V, Salo JA, Haapiainen R, Salo H. Strain gauge plethysmography in the assessment of venous reux after subfascial closure of perforating veins: A prospec­tive study of twenty patients. J Vasc Surg. 1990;12:34–37.
•27. Padberg FT, Jr, Johnston MV, Sisto SA. Structured exercise improves calf muscle pump function in chronic venous insuf­ciency: A randomized trial. J Vasc Surg. 2004;39(1):79–87.
28. *Raju S, Knepper J, May C, Knight A, Pace N, Jayaraj A. Ambulatory venous pressure, air plethysmography, and the role of calf venous pump in chronic venous disease. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2019 May;7(3):428–440.
29. van Bemmelen PS, Bedford G, Beach K, Strandness DE. Quantitative segmental evaluation of venous valvular reux with duplex ultrasound scanning. J Vasc Surg. 1989;10:425–431.
30. van Bemmelen PS, Beach K, Bedford G, Strandness DE, Jr. The mechanism of venous valve closure. Its relationship to the velocity of reverse ow. Arch Surg. 1990;125:617–619.
31. van Ramshorst B, van Bemmelen PS, Hoe­neveld H, Eikelboom BC. The development of valvular incompetence after deep vein thrombosis: A follow-up study with duplex scanning. J Vasc Surg. 1994;19:1059–1066.
32. Labropoulos N, Tiongson J, Pryor L, Tas­siopoulos AK, Kang SS, Ashraf Mansour
M, Baker WH. Denition of venous reux in lower-extremity veins. J Vasc Surg. 2003 Oct;38(4):793–798.
33. Labropoulos N, Mansour MA, Kang SS, Gloviczki P, Baker WH. New insights into perforator vein incompetence. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1999;18:228–234.
34. Sandri JL, Barros FS, Pontes S, Jacques C, Salles-Cunha SX. Diameter-reux relationship in perforating veins of patients with varicose veins. J Vasc Surg. 1999 Nov;30(5):867–874.
35. Dupas B, el Kouri D, Curtet C, et al. Angiomagnetic resonance imaging of ilio­femorocaval venous thrombosis. Lancet. 1995;346(8966):17–79.
36. Chung JW, Yoon CJ, Jung SI, et al. Acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis: Evalua­tion of underlying anatomic abnormalities by spiral CT venography. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2004;15:249–256.
*37. Toh MR, Damodharan K, Lim M, Yap C,
Chong TT, Tang TY. Computed tomo­graphy venography versus intravascular ultrasound in the diagnosis of iliofemoral vein stenosis. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2020 Nov;8(6):1122–1123.
38. Kibbe MR, Ujiki M, Goodwin AL, Eskandari M, Yao J, Matsumura J. Iliac vein compression in an asymptomatic patient population. J Vasc Surg. 2004 May;39(5):937–943.
39. Zhu Q, Yang L, Zhu H, Kong W, Feng R, Luo J, Chen M, Wu D, Yu Q, Zhang R, Luo M. Prevalence of left iliac vein com­pression in an asymptomatic population and patients with left iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis: A multicenter cross-sectional study in southern China. Phlebology. 2022 Sep;37(8):602–609.
40. Park JY, Park KM, Cho SG, Hong KC, Jeon YS. Atypical iliac vein compression in patients with symptomatic May-Thur­ner syndrome. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2021 May;27(3):372–377.
41. Chen F, Deng J, Hu XM, Zhou WM. Compression of the right iliac vein in asymptomatic subjects and patients with iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis. Phlebo­logy. 2016 Aug;31(7):471–480.
42. Rabinov K, Paulin S. Roentgen diagnosis of venous thrombosis in the leg. Arch Surg. 1972;104:134–344.
43. Kistner RL, Ferris EB, Randhawa G, Kamida C. A method of performing descending venography. J Vasc Surg. 1986;4:464–468.
44. Forauer AR, Gemmete JJ, Dasika NL, et al. Intravascular ultrasound in the diagnosis and treatment of iliac vein compression (May–Thurner) syndrome. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2002;13:523–527.
45. Toh MR, Damodharan K, Lim M, Yap C, Chong TT, Tang TY. Computed tomography venography versus intravas­cular ultrasound in the diagnosis of ilio­femoral vein stenosis. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2020 Nov;8(6): 1122–1123.
CHAPTER
Compression therapy for chronic
(a)
(b)
https://t.me/med1917
venous disease and venous ulceration
Sergio Gianesini, Leo J. Daab, Erica Menegatti, Yung-Wei Chi,
33.1 RATIONALE
Compression therapy is rst-line treatment for chronic venous disease (CVD) with or without venous ulceration alone or in conjunction with other therapies (Figures 33.1 and 33.2). The goal is to improve symptoms and function-
33
Hugo Partsch, and Gregory L. Moneta
(c)
33.2 Large venous ulcer requiring 15 months for healing with
compression bandages/elastic stockings/nutritional supplemen­tation. On the left before treatment, on the right at 15 months.
ality, heal ulcers, and prevent ulcer recurrence. Patients with ulcers will not all heal rapidly or completely with compres­sion alone or as an adjunct to other therapies, and ulcer recurrence is a problem. include older age, obesity, deep venous reux, arterial insuf­ciency, poor compliance with therapy and long-standing or large ulcers, or multiple recurrences of ulceration.
Ambulatory compression can be with elastic stockings, paste gauze boots (Unna boot), and multilayer elastic wraps, dressings, and bandages. Pneumatic compression devices are also employed.
1
Risk factors for treatment failure
2,3
33.2 MECHANISM
33.1 Healing of a venous ulcer with an elastic stocking (a) 1
month, (b) 2 months, and (c) 3 months.
DOI: 10.1201/9781003328971-37
Ambulatory venous hypertension and the presence of ele­vated venous pressure at the ankle during exercise facilitate tissue damage associated with CVD. Specic mechanisms
327327
328 Chapter 33 Compression therapy for chronic venous disease and venous ulceration
https://t.me/med1917
are subjects of active research and include endothelial shear stress increase and neutrophil/monocyte activation. Increased capillary permeability promotes leakage of plasma proteins and cytokines into the extravascular space. A perivascular brin cuff can form, potentially impeding wound healing, but such cuffs are discontinuous around capillaries, and ulcers can heal despite their presence at the ulcer border. ping of leukocytes with release of harmful free radicals, proteolytic enzymes, and cytokines.
4
Increased venous pressure may lead to trap-
5
No matter the biochemical etiology of venous ulceration, ambulatory venous hypertension must be overcome to pro­mote healing. Compression therapy should create internal pressures evenly distributed within the leg to maximize effects of calf muscle contraction and optimize venous return: Pas­cal’s law, which states pressure applied to an enclosed system with an incompressible uid is evenly distributed.
6,7
Compres­sion promotes uid movement into the venous and lymphatic systems due to generating pressure gradients between the interstitial and intravascular space. The greater the pressure increase, the greater the force promoting venous return. Opti­mal pressures required for therapeutic effects are debated.
8
Gravity drives lower extremity intravenous pressure, with effects depending on body position. It must be over­come for the treatment of CVD. Leg vein intravenous pressure reects the weight of the blood column between the site of measurement and the right atrium. Supine ankle venous pressure is 10–20 mmHg.
9
Lower leg veins are nar­rowed by external pressures of 10–20 mmHg that restore valve competency, with veins totally occluded by pressures of 20 mmHg. Venous narrowing by such low pressures may explain the favorable effects of thromboprophylactic stockings exerting pressures of 15–20 mmHg in recumbent patients. During standing, lower leg intravenous pressures rise to 60 mmHg, depending on subject height, and exter­nal pressures of 35–40 mmHg are needed to narrow the veins, while venous occlusion requires pressures up to 70
10
mmHg.
The major hemodynamic effects of compression in upright subjects can therefore only be expected with interface pressures >35–40 mmHg. Based on microcircu­latory investigations and patient compliance proles, an upper limit of 60 mmHg for externally applied sustained compression appears safe without hindering compliance with therapy. Intermittent pressure peaks with walking can, however, considerably exceed 60 mmHg.
10
Complete venous closure may not be necessary. Valve competency is restored by external pressures far lower than needed to achieve vein closure. Properly tted graduated compression stockings result in venous rell time normal­ization and improved residual volume fractions linearly correlating with reux severity.
11,12
Calf ejection fraction may also be facilitated by stockings applying more pressure at the calf rather than with graduated compression apply­ing more pressure at the ankle.
13
Inelastic bandages, resistant to changes in leg circum­ference, produce more pronounced and sustained venous reux reductions compared to elastic material with the same resting pressure. Inelastic bandages applied with a resting pressure >50 mmHg demonstrate signicant reduc­tions in ambulatory venous pressure in patients with severe venous insufciency walking on a treadmill.
14
This may be explained by intermittent occlusion of leg veins exerted by ambulatory pressure peaks of 80 mmHg with inelas­tic bandages. Such effects cannot be achieved with elastic stockings that increase ambulatory interface pressures only 3–8 mmHg above resting pressures.
11
Many possible local skin and subcutaneous tissue micro­circulatory and hemodynamic variables may benet from compression therapy. Perimalleolar subcutaneous pressure increases with elastic compression, and increased subcuta­neous pressure should obviate Starling forces favoring cap­illary uid leak and create Starling gradients favoring uid movement from the interstitial space into lymphatics
15
(Fig-
ure 33.3). These observations correlate with the obvious fact
33.3 Wick needle and transducer for evaluating changes in subcutaneous metabolism mediated by external compression devices.
Straight
clamp
Needle
C-ARM
Transducer
Micrometer
33.3 Patient evaluation 329
Transmitted venous hypertension
Ulceration
Altered lymphatics
Epidermis
Dermis
Subcutaneous
https://t.me/med1917
Arteriole
Venule
33.4 Ulcer bed and underlying structure with potential altered environment.
conditions associated with CVD such venous thrombo­embolism; hypercoaguable states; and other medical con­ditions promoting edema such as cardiac, liver, and renal dysfunction need consideration, remembering strong com­pression applied to both lower extremities may shift consid­erable blood volume toward the heart. Strong compression may therefore be contraindicated in some patients with severe cardiac dysfunction. Systemic conditions that affect wound healing such as diabetes mellitus, immunosuppres­sion, and malnutrition are evaluated and improved as much as possible prior to and during compression therapy.
Findings associated with CVD include lower extrem­ity edema, varicose veins, and evidence of CVD-associated chronic skin changes of lipodermatosclerosis, hemosiderin
33.5 Tortuous subdermal capillary characteristic of advanced
chronic venous disease.
deposition, and evidence of previously healed ulcers: atro­phie blanche. A denitive diagnosis of ulceration secondary to CVD must be made prior to undergoing compression
that elastic and nonelastic bandages reduce lower extremity edema in CVD patients. With edema reduction, cutaneous and subcutaneous metabolism may improve, with enhanced oxygen diffusion and nutrient transport to skin and subcu­taneous tissue cellular elements.
Effects of compression therapy on alterations in cuta­neous and subcutaneous biochemistry remain largely unknown (Figure
33.4). Anti-inammatory cytokine interleukin 1 receptor antagonist (IL-1 Ra) levels increase with compression, with reductions of inammatory cyto­kines such as tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) partially responsible for increases in microvascular permeability and for proliferation of tortuous, elongated cutaneous cap­illaries prone to injury, correlating with ulcer healing
16–18
(Figure 33.5).
treatment of a leg ulcer. Venous insufciency and/or obstruc­tion must be documented in the noninvasive vascular labo­ratory or, in selected cases, by venography or intravascular ultrasound prior to initiating compression therapy.
Possible arterial insufciency must be assessed by physical examination and/or noninvasive studies. Venous ulceration with coexisting arterial insufciency, especially if severe, is difcult to heal with arterial insufciency—a recognized risk factor for nonhealing of venous ulcer­ation. the presence of severe arterial insufciency. Already dimin­ished skin perfusion pressures can be further diminished, leading to increased risk for critical ischemia. Compression may be essentially contraindicated in patients with an ankle-brachial systolic blood pressure ratio <0.5. However, patients with lesser degrees of arterial insufciency may tolerate and benet from compression therapy.
33.3 PATIENT EVALUATION
Finally, compression therapy works best when patients understand their disease and therapy goals. Prior to start­ing compression therapy, and at every clinic and/or home
About 70% of leg ulcers are venous.19 Evaluation of CVD patients therefore begins with a history and physical exam­ination to exclude nonvenous etiologies. Medication use;
health or wound care visit, patients must be educated about their disease and the need to comply with treat­ment plans.
Tissue hypoxia/ malnutrition
Fibrin deposition and edema
Dilated capillaries
20
Compression therapy can be counterproductive in
21
33
330 Chapter 33 Compression therapy for chronic venous disease and venous ulceration
https://t.me/med1917
33.4 FORMS OF COMPRESSION THERAPY
Two main actions associated with compression are edema reduction and hemodynamic improvement. The rst can be obtained with limited pressure doses. The latter requires specic compression features.
33.4.1 Compression dosage
Pressure exerted on the skin by a compression device is the “interface pressure.” It expresses the “dose” of pressure and magnitude of compression. Interface pressure data are conicting in that, with similar subcutaneous thicknesses and lower limb shapes, studies have showed variations of >50% in pressures applied to the subcutaneous tissue. The law of LaPlace provides a partial explanation for data variation. It indicates that limb shape can inuence inter­face pressure that is also related to the tension and number of compression layers applied and inversely correlated with limb circumference and widths of compressive bandages. All these variables, in turn, might have signicant conse­quences on the nal measured interface pressure of a com­pression garment or bandage.
Material stiffness is equally important to interface pres­sure in determining compression effects. Material stiffness reects a material’s ability to counteract lower limb expan­sion in response to swelling induced by gravitational forces. The static stiffness index is calculated by subtracting inter­face pressure at the B1 level (where the tendinous part of the gastrocnemius muscle turns into the musculature) in a supine subject from the B1 interface pressure with the subject standing. A static stiffness >10 indicates rigid/stiff compression (hemodynamic effects), while a value <10 is associated with elastic anti-edema effects.
33.4.2 Graduated elastic compression
stockings
Compression therapy is most common with gradient elas­tic compression stockings (ECSs). Natural compression occurs in an aquatic environment. This reects the Stevin law: where hydrostatic pressure exerts graduated com­pression on immersed limbs equivalent to 0.7 mmHg/cen­timeter of water. Conrad Jobst, were made to simulate gradient hydrostatic forces exerted by water in a swimming pool.
ECSs are available in various compositions, strengths, and lengths and can be customized. They may be round or at-knit, based on manufacturing process and desired nal elastic properties. Round-knit stockings are knitted seam­lessly along their entire length using the same number of needles but with stitch size variations. Flat-knit stockings are produced with the same stitch size. Different circum­ferences are created by changing needle numbers. Different compositions facilitate use in patients with different body shapes, leg sizes, and contours, providing the ability to adapt to different leg circumferences, deep skin folds, and/ or edema of the forefoot/toes.
Graduated ECSs are classied based on ankle absolute interface pressure. Different ranges of interface pressures
27
Gradient ECSs, initially developed by
22
23
24
25
26,27
28
27,29
TABLE 33.1 Different graduated compression stocking
classications based on interface pressure
USA (mmHg; U.S. standard)
15–20 15–20 15–17
20–30 20–36 18–21 30–40 >36 23–31 40–50 34–46 >50
France (mmHg; AFNOR)
10–15
Germany (mmHg; RAL)
are used in different regions of the world, fueling pre­scriber and user confusion (Table 33.1). ECSs are avail­able in four strengths based on interface pressure. Class 1, 10–15 mmHg, are available over the counter and through the internet. Class 2, 20–30 mmHg; class 3, 30–40 mmHg; and class 4, 40–50 mmHg generally require prescriptions.
ECSs are less bulky than other forms of compression therapy and can be worn with normal footwear and allow daily wound inspection. ECSs have the advantage that effects, unlike compressive bandages, are operator inde­pendent and dependent on ECS strength. However, ECSs must be worn to be effective and are easily removed or “forgotten” by noncompliant patients.
The benets of ECSs in compliant patients for healing of venous ulceration are well-documented. The rst rea­sonably rigorous study using modern statistical analysis was a retrospective review of 113 venous ulcer patients treated with below-knee 30–40 mmHg ECSs.
30
Complete ulcer healing occurred in 99/102 (97%) patients compliant with stockings versus 6/11 (55%) who were noncompli­ant (P < 0.0001). Mean healing time was 5 months. Ulcer recurrence was less in ECS-compliant patients; 29% at 5 years versus 100% at 3 years in noncompliant patients. Not all centers, however, have had such favorable results healing venous ulcers with ECSs. Older, less compliant patients and populations with higher percentages of recur­rent or long-standing ulcers will not do as well. Neverthe­less, modern reviews have further conrmed the utility of ECSs for healing venous ulcers.
31
Patient compliance begins with patient education and reinforcement at every ofce and clinic visit. Many patients are initially intolerant of compression because of hypersen­sitivity adjacent to ulcers or at sites of previously healed ulcers. This intolerance can sometimes be overcome by ini­tially tting the patient with lower-strength ECSs followed by higher-strength stockings. An obvious disadvantage is the added expense of “introductory” stockings.
Compliance with ECSs was evaluated in 3144 new CVD patients from 1998 to 2006. Full or partial compli­ance was reported by 37% of patients; 63% did not use the stockings or abandoned them. Thirty percent of noncom­pliant participants could not specify a reason for noncom­pliance; 25% did not have a prescription; 14% did not feel they helped; 13% reported a sensation of “cutting off” cir­culation; 8% felt the stockings were too hot; 2% reported limb soreness; 2% poor cosmesis; 2% unable to apply; 2% itching or contact dermatitis; and 2% cost.
32
33.6 Donning devices for elastic stockings. (A) Silk sleeves
https://t.me/med1917
allow the open-toe stocking to slip more easily onto the foot. The sleeve is pulled out after application. (B) The so-called “Butler” device. The patient loads the stocking on the wire frame, steps into it, and then pulls up on the device to apply the stocking.
Donning aids assist in the application of elastic stock-
33
With open-toe stockings, an inner silk sleeve can
ings. be placed over the forefoot to allow the stocking to slide smoothly during application. Another device allows the patient to load the stocking onto a wire frame. The patient steps into the stocking and pulls the device upward, thereby applying the stocking (Figure 33.6).
Evidence is not robust, but ulcer recurrence after heal­ing appears to be lessened by ECS and other forms of com­pression. unwillingness of many insurers to provide coverage for ECSs in spite of evidence demonstrating their cost-effectiveness.
34,35
An additional problem after ulcer healing is the
36
ECSs are used to prevent post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS), which results in 25%–50% of patients following deep venous thrombosis and can lead to venous ulceration. However, the SOX trial, a randomized, placebo-controlled trial, questioned the use of ECSs for PTS prevention.
37
Patients (n = 410) were randomly assigned to either 30–40 mmHg ECSs or placebo stockings, <5 mmHg of pressure, and followed for 2 years. The cumulative incidence of PTS was 14.2% in patients with the active ECSs and 12.7% in the placebo arm, indicating no ECS benet. Previous open-label, small, single-center studies did show a benet in using compression to prevent PTS.
38
While the utility of compression stockings for PTS prevention remains unclear, once someone has developed PTS, compression therapy remains a cornerstone of management.
ECS therapy improves quality of life (QoL) in patients with CVD. In a prospective study, 112 patients with CVD treated with 30–40 mmHg ECSs were administered a ques­tionnaire quantifying CVD symptoms, cosmesis, depres­sion, and sleep alterations, with overall improvement in severity scores at 1 month, with further improvements at
33.4 Forms of compression therapy 331
39
16 months. the spectrum of CVD: CEAP classes 1–6.
QoL improvement with ECSs extends across
40
33.4.3 Paste boots
A popular compression method was developed by the Ger­man dermatologist Paul Gerson Unna. The Unna boot has been used to treat venous ulcers for many years. There are many versions. It is basically a compression bandage: typi­cally a three- or four-layer dressing. It requires application by trained personnel. A rolled gauze bandage impregnated with calamine, zinc oxide, glycerin, sorbitol, gelatin, and magnesium aluminum silicate is rst applied with graded compression from the forefoot to just below the knee. Additional layers are continuous gauze dressing followed by an outer layer of elastic wrap applied with graded com­pression. The bandage stiffens after drying, and the result­ing rigidity aids in preventing edema. The supine resting pressure on the distal lower leg immediately after applica­tion may be 50–60 mmHg. Unna boots are changed weekly or sooner if the patient has signicant ulcer bed drainage. The Unna boot requires minimal patient involvement, providing continuous compression and topical therapy. An Unna boot also has disadvantages. It is uncomfortable for some patients, adversely affecting compliance. Ulcers cannot be monitored between applications. Application is labor intensive and the compression provided operator dependent. Patients can develop contact dermatitis to com­ponents of the Unna boot. A 15-year review of 998 patients with venous ulcers treated with Unna dressings found 73% of ulcers healed, with a median healing time of 9 weeks. A randomized, prospective study compared Unna boot to polyurethane foam dressing in 36 venous ulcer patients with superior healing over 12 months for the Unna boot patients (94.7% vs 41.2%).
42
33.4.4 Compressive bandages
Purported advantages of multilayered compressive dress­ings include long maintenance of compression, even com­pression distribution, and better exudate absorption. A wide variety of compression materials with different tex­tures are available, resulting in bandages with variable interface pressures and stiffness.
33.4.4.1 Classification
Bandages are classied according to the percent elongation of the material following application of a 10 N/cm force
0%–10% (rigid)
10%–100% (short stretch)
>100% (long stretch)
33.4.4.2 Pressure
Pressure, layers, components, and elastic properties (P-LA­C-E) are important features of compression bandages. The pressure delivered depends on the wrapping technique, limb radius/curvature, number of layers, and material elas­tic properties.
In the supine position, pressure ranges in the gaiter area
are classied according to a consensus conference proposal
33
41
43
:
332 Chapter 33 Compression therapy for chronic venous disease and venous ulceration
https://t.me/med1917
TABLE 33.2 Pressure ranges of compression bandages
measured supine at B1, where the Achilles tendon changes into the muscular component of the gastrocnemius muscle
Recommendation mmHg
Mild <20 Moderate 20–40 Strong 40–60 Very strong >60
47
(Table 33.2).43 Interface pressures exerted during standing and walking increase based on material elasticity. “Strong” and “very strong” bandages produce higher interface pres­sures than ECSs.
33.4.4.3 Layers
Single-layer bandages usually have an overlap of up to 50%. Multilayer bandages consist of several single-layer bandages.
33.4.4.4 Components
Bandage components are materials in compression ban­dages. For multilayer bandages, at least two different ban­dage materials are applied over each other for the length of the bandage. Beside padding, protection, and retention, bandage materials inuence interface pressure and stiffness (Figure
33.7).
33.4.4.5 Elastic properties
The elasticity of materials used in a compressive bandage (as well as fabrics in ECSs) is determined with in vitro measurements using extensometer devices that assess power exerted to distend the material and resulting stretch: a so-called hysteresis curve. achieve a pressure of about 40 mmHg at the gaiter area. “Strong” bandage material will need to be stretched less than “weak” bandage material to achieve this pressure.
Compressive bandages have varying degrees of stiffness, with stiffness dened as the increase in pressure applied per centimeter increase in leg circumference. A higher stiffness indicates relative bandage inelasticity. An inelastic bandage is dened as having a pressure increase of >10 mmHg mov­ing from a supine to standing position, whereas an elastic bandage has pressure increases <10 mmHg from supine to standing. High stiffness (inelasticity) bandages include ban­dages of two 5-meter-long, short-stretch bandages applied in opposite directions (e.g., Comprilan, Rosidal K, Pütter bandage). Inelastic kits have components of padding, foam material, short-stretch bandages, and a protecting hose­layer (Rosidal Sys bandage). The main component of these bandages is cotton, which is permeable to air, well toler­ated, and washable for reuse (Comprilan, Rosidal).
More layers of similar elastic materials create bandages with increased inelastic properties. This also happens when two ECSs are donned over each other or when several com­ponents of different materials are applied as friction increases between the rough surfaces of different layers which will, in addition to the ber elastic strain, oppose expansion of the
11
In general, one attempts to
33.7 Proper bandaging technique with 50% overlap with each
wrap around the leg.
leg to gravitational forces. Bandages with high friction are cohesive bandages that adhere to the underlying layer and adhesive bandages that adhere to the skin.
Applying several elastic layers over each other also cre­ates a bandage with rather high stiffness (four-layer bandage, Profore). The nal bandage exerts an interface pressure of about 40 mmHg on the supine distal lower leg. The Coban2 layer kit is two layers with adhesive surfaces. It is an easy-to­apply, stable, nonbulky, high-stiffness bandage.
There are two main disadvantages of inelastic ban­dages. Loss of pressure starts immediately after applica­tion. The initial resting pressure will decrease 25% 1 hour after application due to immediate limb volume decreases. Another disadvantage is proper application is difcult and requires training. Rapid pressure drops mean inelastic ban­dages are applied with much higher initial tension than elastic bandages. Inadequate bandaging technique may be the main reason for the poor outcomes in some studies.
Elastic bandages are the Ace bandage, Surepress, and Perfekta. Proguide kits consist of a padding layer and an elastic bandage. Elongation of elastic bandages leads to a low increase in pressure. Such bandages may exert a rela­tively high resting pressure but will only minimally increase pressure during walking (“low working pressure”). They are relatively easy to apply by untrained staff and patients. The main disadvantage is high resting pressure and the uncom­fortable feeling of the constricting force of the elastic bers. High resting pressure is also responsible for skin damage that may occur, particularly in patients with arterial disease and over sites prone to pressure such as the ankle tendon.
Stiffer, more inelastic bandages may have greater effects on deep venous hemodynamics than less stiff bandages. There are greater improvements in venous lling index with the short-stretch, more inelastic bandages.
44
45
33.4 Forms of compression therapy 333
https://t.me/med1917
A relatively stiff bandaging system (multilayer wrap of orthopedic wool, crepe bandages, and Coban bandages) used in 148 ulcerated limbs refractory to simple wraps found measurements of compression declined only 10% over 1 week and 74% of ulcers healed at 12 weeks.
46
A direct comparison between a relatively elastic ban­daging regimen and a relatively inelastic regimen random­ized venous ulcer patients to an elastic bandaging regimen (n = 57) or an inelastic regimen (n = 55). Larger ulcers took longer to heal with the elastic bandaging, but complete healing at 26 weeks was no different: 58% of those treated with the more elastic bandage and 62% of those treated with the inelastic system.
47
Dramatic results have been reported in healing very large venous ulcers with a heelless, open-toe, elastic, mul­tilayered compression device knitted into a tubular con­guration. One hundred and thirty-eight patients with very large venous ulcers (20–210 cm
2
) were randomized to treatment with the multilayered tubular device (n = 72) versus bandaging plus compression stockings (n = 66). Cumulative healing was 93% in the group treated with the multilayered tubular dressing and 51% in the group treated with bandaging plus compression stockings.
48
The Venous Ulcer Study IV, VenUS IV, a randomized, controlled trial involving 453 participants from 34 centers in England and Northern Ireland, stratied patients by ulcer duration and area to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of compression with two-layer hosiery versus four-layer compression bandages. The primary endpoint was time to heal. Maximum follow-up was 12 months. Median time to healing was 99 days in the hosiery group and 98 days in the bandage group. Economic analysis indicated a signicant advantage for the hosiery group.
53
Pertinent points for the use of compression bandages are summarized in Table 33.3.
33.4.5 Legging orthosis
Compression wraps using patient-adjustable strips appear competitive in clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness compared to bandaging. These devices require patient education in application and adjustment to reach desired interface pressures. They facilitate self-management by potentially obviating problems of other devices such as need for application by a professional, inadequate appli­cation, and decreased compression over time. Patients can maintain long-lasting consistent compression without fre­quent professional bandage changes.
54,55
Circ-Aid is such a legging orthosis consisting of multiple pliable, rigid, adjustable compression bands. The bands are held in place with Velcro wrap around the leg from the ankle to the knee (Figure 33.8). Bands are adjustable and compression tai­lored as limb edema decreases. Such devices are especially useful in patients unable or unwilling to wear ECSs and may be superior to ECSs in preventing limb swelling in advanced CVD limbs.
33.4.6 Pneumatic compression devices
External pneumatic compression devices are adjuncts for CVD treatment. edema or morbid obesity, they may be particularly useful. Single- or multi-chamber compression bladders are avail­able and should have dedicated protocols of ination/dea-
management are lacking, so individual patient application is largely empiric. Relative contraindications are arterial insufciency and uncontrolled congestive heart failure.
Pneumatic compression devices that provide sequential gradient intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) have received the most attention. Results with these devices suggest
56
For patients with CVD with severe
33
TABLE 33.3 Key points for compressive bandages
• Elastic bandages are easier to handle than inelastic bandages and may be applied by untrained staff or patients.
• Inelastic material should be applied with much higher resting pressure, pressing the bandage roll toward the leg as if molding clay. Patients should immediately walk for at least 30 minutes to decrease edema and decrease the pressure exerted by the bandage.
• Bandages are applied with less tension and ample amounts of orthopedic wool padding to patients with small ankle circumferences.
• The initial turn may start at the base of the toes, around the ankle, or between the heel and the dorsal tendon to x the bandage.
• Ankle joints are bandaged with maximal dorsal extension and the tendon protected with cotton.
• Overlapping is carried out in a spiral fashion or with gures of eight (herringbone pattern).
• The proximal end of a knee-high bandage covers the bular head.
• No gaps. Each turn overlaps the previous turn by 50% (Figure 33.6).
• Bandage materials must be nonallergenic.
• Pads can increase local pressure over ulcers or lipodermatosclerotic areas.
• Pain may indicate arterial ischemia, and the bandage must be removed immediately.
• Bandaging of the lower leg is sufcient for the majority of patients with CVD.
• Walking exercises are essential to optimize the effect of compression therapy. However, compression is also able to reduce edema in immobile patients or in those with severely restricted mobility. Inelastic xed bandages are preferred for this indication because of the lower resting pressure.
• After walking, pressure drops, and the bandage will loosen after a few days as edema decreases. It should then be changed or over­wrapped with a short-stretch bandage.
• The bandage is changed every 7 days on average, sooner if exudate is a problem.