Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3727_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
29 Мб
Скачать
314 Chapter 31 Clinical presentation and assessment of patients with venous disease
https://t.me/med1917
malignancy. If there is concern about the adequacy of the deep venous outow, the arm can be observed for swelling after application of a light supercial tourniquet. Symptoms of PE should prompt a full cardiorespiratory examination.
31.3 THE LOWER LIMB
Chronic venous disease is extremely common in the West­ern world, with a variable incidence reported worldwide. Up to 80% of the general population will display evidence of venous disease, with 20%–64% suffering from varicose veins and 1%–2% affected by venous ulceration. markedly increases in the elderly population. Venous dis­ease is known to negatively impact quality of life a signicant association with depression.
14
Furthermore, European and U.S. data have estimated the cost of venous disease to be approximately 1%–2% of the annual health care budget.
15
31.3.1 Superficial venous
thrombophlebitis
SVT can occur spontaneously or secondary to trauma or intervention. Iatrogenic injury from intravenous cannu­lation and infusion of causative agents is the most com­mon cause in normal veins. This can present as a tender lump or cord along the course of the vein. Treatment is via removal of the intravenous catheter, and resolution of the condition can take months. Iatrogenic thrombophlebi­tis may be complicated by bacterial infection, particularly in patients undergoing long-term intravenous cannulation. Septic phlebitis and suppurative thrombophlebitis are seri­ous complications requiring antibiotic treatment and even surgical debridement in some cases. Systemic features and abscess formation are uncommon.
SVT can also arise in association with a known or occult malignancy and, in this circumstance, is often migratory. It may also be associated with thrombophilia.
Thrombophlebitis can occur in diseased varicose veins in the form of sterile thrombosis. This is particularly com­mon in pregnancy and presents as a hard, tender knot in the vein, with intense pain and overlying erythema. The inammatory process can extend beyond the vein wall, resulting in bleeding. Phlebitic episodes in varicose veins are an indication for interventional treatment.
The main risk with SVT is the development of deep venous propagation. The risk of venous thromboembolism can be as high as 25% in the acute setting and up to 10% at 3 months follow-up, challenging the widely held belief that SVT is a benign entity.
The diagnosis of SVT is made based on the history and clinical examination, which often reveals erythema, warmth, and tenderness (Figure 31.3). Upon resolution, there is often a residual mass or cord in the affected super­cial vein.
Duplex ultrasound assessment can help characterize the extent of SVT and the presence of any deep venous prop­agation, which may be present in the absence of clinical symptoms.
16
12
This
13
and has
31.3 Supercial thrombophlebitis of the left thigh.
31.3.2 Deep venous thrombosis
DVT leading to PE is a leading cause of preventable hos­pital death in adult patients, with an annual incidence of 1:1000 adults. hypercoagulability) and environmental (surgery, hospital­ization, trauma, pregnancy, hormone therapy, obesity, and cancer) factors. It is of paramount importance that a possi­ble diagnosis of DVT be considered in patients at risk and that appropriate risk assessment tools are employed as a preventative measure in these patients.
The mortality rate of those diagnosed with PE is approximately 10%. Cadaveric studies have, however, identied PE in up to 30% of individuals with a DVT, high­lighting the fact that many PEs are subclinical. In fact, CT pulmonary angiography is now able to identify very small, subclinical pulmonary emboli.
It is helpful to consider the development of DVT in two phases: embolic (early) and thrombotic (late). In the early phase, the thrombus is nonocclusive and not yet organized. As a result, there is no swelling, inammation, or disten­sion of supercial collateral veins, and the leg may appear quite normal despite a signicant risk of embolism. In the late phase, the thrombus becomes occlusive and causes a phlebitic reaction, anchoring it to the vein wall; in addi­tion, inammatory signs and symptoms due to peri-phlebi­tis become apparent. The patient develops all the “typical” clinical features of DVT. At this stage, however, the risk of PE is low. The clinical diagnosis of DVT is difcult to make due to the poor sensitivity and specicity of clinical signs. Even when symptoms are present, studies show that fewer than half of such patients have a DVT. Homan sign (pain in the calf elicited upon passive dorsiexion of the foot in a patient in the supine position with the knee exed) is unre­liable, painful, and should not be performed.
The Wells scoring system probability of a patient having DVT before diagnostic tests are performed (see Chapter 18, Table 18.1). Patients with a score of 2 or more are more likely to have DVT.
Anatomically, it is useful to consider three patterns of disease (calf, femoral, and iliofemoral), although throm­bosis is a dynamic process and proximal propagation is common.
17
Risk factors include innate (age and
18
19
is used to determine the
31.3 The lower limb 315
https://t.me/med1917
Calf vein thrombosis is usually localized to one or two of the three major veins of the lower leg. Often, the thrombi are nonobstructive, and due to the pairing of tibial and peroneal veins, venous drainage may remain adequate. Calf tenderness may be present, but signicant swelling is usually absent. In fact, most patients have no symptoms or signs whatsoever. About 20%, if untreated, may propagate into an above-knee deep vein. Calf vein thrombosis is the most common site of lower limb DVT and may propagate to the femoral vein. When the popliteal or femoral vein is involved, there may be swelling at the ankle and at the calf of greater than 1 cm in most patients, but this rarely extends above the patella unless outow via the deep fem­oral vein is compromised.
Iliofemoral DVT may originate in the pelvic veins and not involve the distal femoral or calf veins in over 30% of patients. Consequently, duplex ultrasound commonly fails to detect it. Clinically, thigh swelling can be present in addi­tion to calf swelling. If the inferior vena cava is involved, signs and symptoms are usually bilateral. This type of thrombosis frequently has a marked inammatory compo­nent, especially in pregnant women. Patients suspected of having this condition are best investigated via contrast CT venography or magnetic resonance venography.
31.3.3 Phlegmasia cerulea dolens
Phlegmasia cerulea dolens is very rare and describes total venous outow obstruction. In the lower limb, this usually affects the iliocaval or the iliofemoral segment with rapid extension into deep and supercial veins. Phlegmasia of the lower limb sequesters a considerable proportion of the patient’s blood and body uids, especially if bilateral. This can result in severe systemic effects, which may include hypovolemic shock and renal failure, in addition to the signs and symptoms, including venous gangrene.
31.3.4 Arteriovenous malformations
These most commonly affect the lower limb; KTS and PWS can present with abnormal varicosities.
KTS is a low-ow vascular malformation with capil­lary, venous, and lymphatic abnormalities. Patients char­acteristically exhibit the clinical triad of port wine stain, varicose veins, and limb hypertrophy. The lower limb is affected in approximately 70% of individuals. with KTS can present with SVT and bleeding from enlarged supercial veins. Typically, the varicose veins can present as anomalous veins or persistent embryonic veins; these are present in 72% of patients with KTS. The most common abnormality is the persistence of a lateral embryonic vein, identiable in the lateral thigh and not joining the deep system. Abnormal medial or suprapubic veins are less com-
20
mon.
PWS usually affects the lower limb and is character­ized by the presence of high-ow arteriovenous stulae. Patients present with cutaneous capillary malformations, limb hypertrophy, and arteriovenous malformations. Supercial veins are prominent secondary to increased pressure. A bruit, or machinery murmur, is audible in the affected limb, and a thrill is palpable throughout the car­diac cycle.
16
Patients
31.3.5 Varicose veins
31.3.5.1 Epidemiology
Varicose veins are a common venous presentation, often found in older patients, those with a positive family his­tory, and in individuals with a high BMI. Height is an addi­tional risk factor recently reported to be associated with the presence of varicose veins. Their prevalence is expected to continue to rise due to the aging population and obesity epidemic.
Varicose veins can be primary or secondary. Primary varicosities arise spontaneously and can be associated with underlying incompetence, or reux, in the supercial veins, or in the junctions between the supercial and deep venous systems (saphenofemoral, saphenopopliteal, or perforator incompetence). Secondary varicosities arise as a result of underlying pathology that has led to the devel­opment of venous hypertension in the supercial venous system. This includes DVT, deep venous incompetence, an intra-abdominal mass causing pressure on the pelvic veins, and obesity.
31.3.5.2 Trunk varices
Truncal varices are varicose veins originating from the main stem and/or major tributaries of the great saphenous vein (GSV) (80% of cases) and/or the small saphenous vein (SSV) (20% of cases). They are usually ≥3 mm in diame­ter, lie subcutaneously, are palpable, and do not discolor or affect the overlying skin. Although more women than men present for assessment and treatment of their varicose veins, the actual prevalence is roughly equal between the sexes.
31.3.5.3 Reticular varices
These veins lie deep in the dermis, are 2–3 mm in diameter, are not palpable, and may render the overlying skin blue in color. They do not blanch on pressure and may or may not be associated with trunk varices.
31.3.5.4 Telangiectasia
Also termed spider or hyphen web veins, they are intrader­mal, 1 mm or less in diameter, impalpable, blanching, and render the overlying skin purple or bright red. Again, they may be associated with trunk and reticular varices and are present in 80% of adults.
31.3.5.5 Symptoms
The presentation of venous disease occurs across a spec­trum, including asymptomatic disease, varicose veins, skin changes, and ulceration. This is best described and assessed via the CEAP (Clinical, Etiological, Anatomical, Patho­physiological) classication, an international system that enables the assessment of venous disease and its severity (see Chapter 9, Table 9.1).
Thread and reticular veins can be unsightly but are not symptomatic. Although rarely life threatening, trunk var­icose veins can have a signicant detrimental effect on a patient’s quality of life that should not be ignored. rate of depression with trunk varicose veins is more than double that of the general population.
21,22
13
The
14
This may be due
31
316 Chapter 31 Clinical presentation and assessment of patients with venous disease
https://t.me/med1917
in part to the cosmetic aspect and in part to the chronicity of the signs and symptoms of venous disease, which can interfere with patients’ daily activities.
Previous local guidance in the UK advised general prac­titioners to refer a patient with varicose veins to secondary care only in the presence of what was dened as advanced disease (C4–C6). Lower CEAP grades were to be man­aged in the community with conservative measures, such as compression and lifestyle advice. Referral to secondary care was warranted in the presence of ulceration, bleeding, progressive skin changes, recurrent SVT, and symptoms having a severe impact on quality of life.
However, the evidence for this approach is lacking and intervention on symptomatic varicose veins has been shown to be a clinically and cost-effective exercise in multi­ple randomized controlled trials. This has led to changes in recommendations both in the UK and internationally, with a greater emphasis on treating symptomatic venous disease before it progresses to skin damage and ulceration. This is exemplied by the Society of Vascular Surgery (SVS), Euro­pean Society of Vascular Surgery (ESVS), and the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines (Table 31.1).
23–25
Patients with varicose veins can be challenging to assess, as they may present with a wide variety of lower limb symptoms, including aching, a dragging feeling, heavi­ness and tension, swelling, tiredness, restless legs, nocturnal cramps, and itching. These symptoms are not specic to varicose veins and are extremely common in the general population. It is important to consider differential diagno­ses (e.g., back pain) and arrange for the appropriate inves­tigations to conrm the clinical suspicion. Management of patient expectations is paramount in the presence of non­specic symptoms, particularly when discussing treatment options. In a patient with evidence of reux on venous duplex, it is important to inform them that intervention may not resolve their symptoms.
31.3.6 Chronic venous insufficiency
Varicose veins are a manifestation of chronic venous dis­ease. Chronic venous insufciency (CVI) describes compli­cations from the presence of elevated venous pressures in the lower limb, resulting in the cutaneous changes that are characteristic of the disease. Ultimately, this leads to skin damage, which may result in ulceration of the lower leg.
31.3.6.1 Symptoms
All the symptoms described earlier for varicose veins may be associated with CVI, and there is a stronger relationship between symptoms and disease severity in this group. This group of patients is signicantly older and, as such, comor­bidities are more common, including peripheral vascular disease and diabetes. When assessing these patients, arterial disease and musculoskeletal problems should not be over­looked. Unlike patients with simple varicose veins, in whom actual swelling is unusual, most patients with CVI have a degree of edema. This is usually of mixed etiology: venous hypertension, cardiac failure, and a degree of lymphedema. Severe pain is unusual and suggests that the patient may have coexisting arterial disease and/or infection.
31.3.6.2 History
This should explore the current episode of skin change/ venous ulceration and any previous episodes. A history of vascular risk factors should be taken, including previous thrombotic episodes; vascular and nonvascular interven­tions to the lower limb, pelvis, and abdomen; malignancy; arterial risk factors; diabetes; autoimmune disease; and smoking. A general history, including family history, med­ications, and allergies, should also be taken. Furthermore, patients should be asked if venous symptoms are present, such as itching, restlessness, aching, heaviness, swelling, and fatigue.
TABLE 31.1 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance 2013
Referral to a vascular service
• Patients with symptomatic primary or recurrent varicose veins
• Patients with skin changes, such as pigmentation or eczema, thought to be caused by chronic venous insufciency
• Supercial venous thrombosis and suspected venous incompetence
• A venous leg ulcer
• A healed venous leg ulcer
• Immediate referral to a vascular service is warranted if there is a bleeding varicose vein Imaging
• Duplex ultrasound should be used to conrm the diagnosis of varicose veins and the extent of truncal reux and to plan treatment for individuals with suspected primary or recurrent varicose veins
Treatment
• Endothermal ablation (radiofrequency or laser) is rst line
• If endothermal ablation is unsuitable, offer ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy
• If ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy is unsuitable, offer surgery
• If incompetent tributaries are present, consider treating them at the same time
• Do not offer compression hosiery to treat varicose veins unless interventional treatment is unsuitable
• Intervention should be avoided in pregnancy, where compression stockings should be offered instead
Source: Adapted from National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2013). Varicose veins: diagnosis and management. (NICE guideline CG168). www. nice.org.uk/guidance/cg168/resources/varicose-veins-diagnosis-and-management-pdf-35109698485957.
31.3 The lower limb 317
https://t.me/med1917
31.3.6.3 Examination findings
31.3.6.3.1 Position
The patient should be examined standing under a good light and in a warm room. Patients may feel faint, and a support should be available. The examiner should ideally be level with the lower limbs (e.g., sitting on a small tool with the patient on a platform with a handrail for balance).
31.3.6.3.2 Inspection
Varicose veins are dilated and tortuous due to the patho­logical reux being commonly, but not exclusively, associ­ated with a cephalad incompetent valve. The main trunks themselves may be dilated, but they are rarely tortuous, as they are supported by the deep fascia. The distribution of varices can give an indication as to whether they are GSV or SSV tributaries (or both) (Figure 31.4). However, in obese patients or those with a history of previous sur­gical intervention, the anatomy may be less well dened. In thin, athletic patients, highly visible and enlarged veins may be erroneously considered to be pathological. These are uniformly dilated and do not exhibit tortuosity. It is also important to note the presence of telangiectasia during inspection.
Veins lying in an abnormal distribution (such as later­ally along the leg, vulval, or in the abdominal wall) are sug­gestive of a congenital cause, an underlying pathological
process (e.g., intra-abdominal mass), or pelvic congestion syndrome.
The signs of CVI include corona phlebectatica, venous eczema, lipodermatosclerosis, hemosiderin deposition, and open (or healed) ulceration. These are most often found around the gaiter area, above the medial malleolus. Corona phlebectatica describes a fan-shaped are of small intrader­mal varices on the medial aspect of the ankle and foot. The apex of the are is in the region of one or more incompe­tent perforators and fans out toward the sole of the foot. Lipodermatosclerosis may be acute or chronic. In the acute phase, it is an inammatory reaction that may be mistaken for cellulitis or phlebitis. It will overlie an area of perforator incompetence, but, unlike cellulitis, the overlying skin will not be warm. In the chronic phase, the skin of the mid to lower calf is pigmented, shiny, hard to the touch, and xed to the underlying chronically inamed and contracted sub­cutaneous tissue. Surrounding dermatitis is common, and there may be a sensitivity reaction to topical medication applied to the area. White scar tissue (atrophie blanche) is often present. The site of lipodermatosclerosis relates to maximum ambulatory pressure, usually communicated by incompetent perforators, which cause localized high-pres­sure damage to the surrounding tissues and skin. This also applies to the sites of ulceration, although as ulcers increase in size, this association becomes less dened. An ulcer char­acterized by a location or shape typical of pressure damage is an important pointer to coexisting arterial disease (see Table 31.2).
31
31.4 Varicose veins in the right great saphenous vein distribution.
31.3.6.3.3 Palpation
Features such as temperature change, the presence of pulses or thrills, tenderness, induration, and edema provide useful information regarding the underlying disease process. The varicosities should also be palpated and an assessment of their course determined. In individuals with bilateral vari­cose veins, an abdominal and groin examination is essen­tial to identify signs of intra-abdominal pathology.
Clinical tests such as the “tap” test of Chevrier or the Trendelenburg test have been historically employed to help assess the patient with venous disease. The “tap” test of Chevrier consists of percussing over a varix while palpat­ing caudally to help trace out the vein. A palpable trans­mitted impulse suggests an incompetent vein between the two sites. The Trendelenburg test consists of applying a tourniquet to the upper thigh to compress the GSV. The patient is then asked to stand, with the examiner assessing for supercial vein lling. The test can be repeated at differ­ent levels to identify the level of incompetence. Handheld Doppler can be used as an adjunct to insonate over the site of incompetence. Again, this was said to be useful in the obese patient but has been found to have a sensitivity of as low as 56% at the saphenofemoral junction and 23% at the saphenopopliteal junction. been found to be poorly predictive of venous anatomy and should not be relied upon to plan surgery. Duplex ultra­sound is the gold-standard investigation tool permitting anatomical and hemodynamic assessment of the supercial and deep venous systems.
26
Overall, these tests have
318 Chapter 31 Clinical presentation and assessment of patients with venous disease
https://t.me/med1917
TABLE 31.2 Differential diagnosis of leg ulceration
Clinical features Arterial ulcer Venous ulcer
Gender Men > women Women > men Age >60 years 40–60 years, but patients may not present
until much older; multiple recurrences
Risk factors Smoking, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, hyper-
tension
Past medical history Most have a clear history of peripheral,
coronary, and cerebrovascular disease
severe neuropathy. Pain may be relieved by dependency.
Site Pressure areas (malleoli, heels, metatarsal
heads, fth metatarsal base) Edge Regular, “punched-out,” indolent Irregular, with neo-epithelium Base Deep, green (sloughy), or black (necrotic)
with no granulation tissue, exposing major
tendons, bones, and joint Surrounding skin Features of chronic ischemia (hairless, dry,
pale) Veins Empty, guttering on elevation Full, usually varicose Swelling Absent Present
Previous deep venous thrombosis, throm­bophilia, varicose veins
>20% clear history of deep venous thrombosis. History suggestive of occult deep venous thrombosis is very common (e.g., leg swelling after childbirth, hip/knee replacement, or long bone fracture).
Approximately 30% have pain, but it is not usually severe and may be relieved upon elevation
Medial (70%) and lateral (20%) or both malleoli and gaiter area
Pink and granulating, may be covered in a yellow-green slough
Lipodermatosclerosis (pigmentation, indu­ration, varicose eczema, atrophie blanche)
31.3.6.3.4 Venous leg ulcer assessment
Ulcer assessment (Figure 31.5) should include:
1. Description of the ulcer, concentrating on the features outlined in Table 31.2
2. Pulse status and ankle-brachial index (ABI)
3. Gait and, in particular, ankle mobility
4. General physical examination
In general, we recommend using the revised Venous Clini­cal Severity Score (VCSS) for patients with chronic venous disorders for grading of clinical severity of the disease and for assessment of post-treatment outcome (see Chapter 78, Table. 78.2).
31.4 CONCLUSION
Venous disease is common and is often accompanied by nonspecic symptoms, such as aching and swelling. This condition may be associated with a signicant risk of mor­bidity and can present in a variety of modalities depending on which part of the venous system is affected. A thor-
ough history and clinical examination can provide crucial information on the underlying pathology and help guide investigations and management, as recommended and sum­marized by clinical practice guidelines.
31.5 Ulceration in the gaiter area of the left lower limb.
23–25
References 319
https://t.me/med1917
Best Practice Statements 31.0 of the American Venous Forum on the clinical presentation and assessment of patients with venous disease
No. Best practice Statements
31.1 In patients with suspected upper extremity venous disease, clinical examination of the upper limb, inspection with compari­son with the contralateral limb, palpation, auscultation, and examination of the axilla for adenopathy should be performed. In patients with adenopathy or swollen arms, we recommend examination of the breast to exclude malignancy.
31.2 In patients with suspected acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the lower extremities, we recommend inspection (edema, cyanosis, and varicosity), palpation (tenderness and pitting edema), auscultation (arterial bruit, heart and lung examination), and examination of the deep and supercial veins and calf muscles.
31.3 To predict the pretest probability of DVT, the clinical scoring system of Wells can be used.
31.4 In patients with varicosity and chronic venous insufciency of the lower extremities, clinical examination should include inspection (varicosity, edema, skin discoloration, corona phlebectatica, ulcer, and lipodermatosclerosis), palpation (cord, varicosity, tenderness, induration, reux, pulses, and thrill), auscultation (bruit), and examination of the groin and abdomen (masses, collateral veins, or lymphadenopathy) and ankle mobility.
31.5 Clinical presentation of patients with varicose veins may include symptoms like aching, heaviness and tension, sensation of swelling, tiredness, restless legs, nocturnal cramps, and itching. There appears to be little or no relationship between these symptoms and the presence and severity of varicose veins or the pattern and severity of reux.
31.6 For patients with chronic venous disorders, the revised Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) is useful for grading clinical severity and for assessment of post-treatment outcome.
REFERENCES
31
* Systematic review or
meta-analysis
Clinical practice guideline or
reporting standards
1. Kotsikoris I., Papas T.T., Papanas N., Maras D., Tsiantula P., Pavlidis P., Andrikopoulou M., Kotsiou S., Maltezos E., Bessias N. Characteristics of patients presenting to the vascular emergency department of a tertiary care hospital: A 2-year study. BMC Res Notes. 2011 Nov 3;4:481. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500­4-481. PMID: 22051248; PMCID: PMC3220668.
2. Green D.P., Hotchkiss R.N., Pederson W.C., Wolfe S.W. Principles of microvas­cular surgery. In: Green’s Operative Hand Surgery, 5th Ed. Elsevier Health Sciences, Philadelphia, 2005.
3. Colletti G., Valassina D., Bertossi D., et al. Contemporary management of vascular malformations. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;72(3):510–528.
4. Kaufman J., Lee M. Vascular and Inter­ventional Radiology: The Requisites, 2nd Ed. Elsevier Health Sciences, Philadelphia,
2013.
5. Dugas J.R., Weiland A.J.Vascular patho­logy in the throwing athlete. Hand Clin. 2000;16(3):477–485.
6. Alla V.M., Natarajan N., Kaushik M., et al. Paget–Schroetter syndrome: Review of pathogenesis and treatment of effort thrombosis. West J Emerg Med. 2010;11(4):358–362.
7. Sajid M.S., Ahmed N., Desai M., et al. Upper limb deep vein thrombosis: A literature review to streamline the protocol for management. Acta Haematol. 2007;118(1):10–18.
8. Yamashita Y., Morimoto T., Amano H., Takase T., Hiramori S., Kim K., Oi M., Akao M., Kobayashi Y., Toyofuku M., Izumi T., Tada T., Chen P.M., Murata K., Tsuyuki Y., Saga S., Nishimoto Y., Sasa T., Sakamoto J., Kinoshita M., Togi K, Mabuchi H., Takabayashi K., Yoshikawa Y., Shiomi H., Kato T., Makiyama T., Ono K., Kimura T. COMMAND VTE registry investigators. Deep vein thrombosis in upper extremities: Clinical characteristics, management strategies and long-term outcomes from the COMMAND VTE registry. Thromb Res. 2019 May;177:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2019.02.031. Epub 2019 Feb 25. PMID: 30825719.
9. Kahn S.R., Elman E.A., Bornais C., Blostein M., Wells P.S. Post-thrombotic syndrome, functional disability and quality of life after upper extremity deep venous thrombosis in adults. Thromb Haemost. 2005 Mar;93(3):499–502. doi: 10.1160/TH04-10-0640. PMID:
15735801.
10. Kakkos S.K., Gohel M., Baekgaard N., Bauersachs R., Bellmunt-Montoya S., Black S.A., Ten Cate-Hoek A.J., Elalamy I., Enzmann F.K., Geroulakos G., Gottsä­ter A., Hunt B.J., Mansilha A., Nicolaides A.N., Sandset P.M., Stansby G., Esvs Gui­delines Committee, de Borst G.J., Bastos Gonçalves F., Chakfé N., Hinchliffe R., Kolh P., Koncar I., Lindholt J.S., Tulamo
R., Twine C.P., Vermassen F., Wanhainen A., Document Reviewers, De Maeseneer M.G., Comerota A.J., Gloviczki P., Kruip M.J.H.A., Monreal M., Prandoni P., Vega de Ceniga M. Editor’s Choice—European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2021 clinical practice guidelines on the mana­gement of venous thrombosis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2021 Jan;61(1):9–82. doi:
10.1016/j.ejvs.2020.09.023. Epub 2020 Dec 15. PMID: 33334670.
*11. Thiyagarajah K., Ellingwood L., Endres
K., Hegazi A., Radford J., Iansavitchene A., et al. Post-thrombotic syndrome and recurrent thromboembolism in patients with upper extremity deep vein thrombosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Thromb Res. 2019; 174:34.e9.
12. Beebe-Dimmer J.L., Pfeifer J.R., Engle J.S., et al. The epidemiology of chronic venous insufciency and varicose veins. Ann Epidemiol. 2005;15(3):175–184.
13. Darvall K.A., Bate G.R., Adam D.J., et al. Generic health-related quality of life is signicantly worse in varicose vein patients with lower limb symptoms independent of CEAP clinical grade. Eur J Vasc EndovascSurg. 2012;44(3):341–344.
14. Sritharan K., Lane T.R., Davies A.H. The burden of depression in patients with symptomatic varicose veins. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2012;43(4): 480–484.
15. Van den Oever R., Hepp B., Debbaut B., et al. Socioeconomic impact of chronic venous insufciency. An underestimated
320 Chapter 31 Clinical presentation and assessment of patients with venous disease
https://t.me/med1917
public health problem. Int Angiol. 1998;17(3):161–167.
16. Decousus H., Quere I., Presles E., Becker F., Barrellier M.T., Chanut M., et al. Supercial venous thrombosis and venous thromboembolism: A large, prospective epidemiologic study. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152:218.e24.
17. Cushman M. Epidemiology and risk factors for venous thrombosis. Semin Hematol. 2007;44(3):62–69.
*18. Dentali F., Ageno W., Becattini C., et
al. Prevalence and clinical history of incidental, asymptomatic pulmonary embolism: A meta-analysis. Thromb Res. 2010;125(6):518–522.
19. Wells P.S., Anderson D.R., Bormanis J., et al. Value of assessment of pretest probability of deep-vein thrombo­sis in clinical management. Lancet. 1997;350(9094):1795–1798.
20. Jacob A.G., Driscoll D.J., Shaughnessy W.J., et al. Klippel–Trenaunay syndrome: Spectrum and management. Mayo Clin Proc1. 998;73(3):28–36.
21. Eklöf B., Rutherford R.B., Bergan J.J., et
al. Revision of the CEAP classication for chronic venous disorders: Consensus state­ment. J Vasc Surg. 2004;40(6):1248–1252.
22. Lurie F., Passman M., Meisner M.,
Dalsing M., Masuda E., Welch H., Bush R.L., Blebea J., Carpentier P.H., De Maeseneer M., Gasparis A., Labro­poulos N., Marston W.A., Rafetto J., Santiago F., Shortell C., Uhl J.F., Urbanek T., van Rij A., Eklof B., Gloviczki P., Kistner R., Lawrence P., Moneta G., Padberg F., Perrin M., Wakeeld T. The 2020 update of the CEAP classication system and reporting standards. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2020 May;8(3):342–352. doi: 10.1016/j. jvsv.2019.12.075 (Epub 2020 Feb 27. Erratum in: J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2021 Jan;9(1):288. PMID:
32113854).
23. Gloviczki P., Comerota A.J., Dalsing
M.C., et al. The care of patients with varicose veins and associated chronic venous diseases: Clinical practice guidelines of the Society for Vascular Surgery and the American Venous Forum. J Vasc Surg. 2011;53(5 Suppl.): 2S–48S.
24. De Maeseneer M.G., Kakkos S.K., Aherne
T., Baekgaard N., Black S., Blomgren L., Giannoukas A., Gohel M., de Graaf R., Hamel-Desnos C., Jawien A., Jaworuc-
ka-Kaczorowska A., Lattimer C.R., Mosti G., Noppeney T., van Rijn M.J., Stansby G., Esvs Guidelines Committee, Kolh P., Bastos Goncalves F., Chakfé N., Coscas R., de Borst G.J., Dias N.V., Hinchliffe R.J., Koncar I.B., Lindholt J.S., Trimarchi S., Tulamo R., Twine C.P., Vermassen F., Wanhainen A., Document Reviewers, Björck M., Labropoulos N., Lurie F., Man­silha A., Nyamekye I.K., Ramirez Ortega M., Ulloa J.H., Urbanek T., van Rij A.M., Vuylsteke M.E. Editor’s Choice—European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2022 clinical practice guidelines on the management of chronic venous disease of the lower limbs. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2022 Feb;63(2):184–267. doi: 10.1016/j. ejvs.2021.12.024. Epub 2022 Jan 11. Erratum in: Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2022 Aug-Sep;64(2–3):284–285. PMID:
35027279.
25. National Institute for Health and Care
Excellence. Varicose veins in the legs. NICE Qual Stand. 2014;67:1–30.
26. Rautio T., Perala J., Biancari F., et al. Accuracy of hand-held Doppler in planning the operation for primary varicose veins. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2002;24(5):450–455.
CHAPTER
32
https://t.me/med1917
Diagnostic algorithm for chronic
venous disorders
Amani D. Politano and Robert B. McLafferty
32.1 INTRODUCTION
Chronic venous disease (CVD) is a common afiction, with a prevalence of up to 64%, The diagnosis of telangiectasia, varicose veins, edema with inammatory changes, and venous ulcers starts with a well­rooted understanding of venous anatomy and pathophys­iology, as outlined in previous chapters. While advances in physiologic testing and duplex and radiologic imaging continue to be made in the eld of CVD, a thorough and directed history and physical examination can lead the pro­vider to the proper clinical assessment conrmed by sup­plementary tests as needed.
This chapter provides a framework for the diagnostic evaluation of CVD, with a thorough history and physical examination being the bedrock to guide further evaluation. These guidelines therefore aim to organize the evaluation of patients with CVD from the history and physical exam­ination to next steps in physiologic venous testing, duplex imaging, or more advanced radiologic imaging.
Characterization of CVD should follow the most recent Clinical, Etiologic, Anatomic, and Pathophysio­logic (CEAP) classication system. described in detail in Chapter 9, the CEAP classication system is a joint venture between the Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS), the American Venous Forum (AVF), and the American Vein and Lymphatic Society (AVLS). The basic CEAP classication should be used for every patient in the clinical setting, and the full or advanced CEAP classica­tion for research purposes. This chapter will focus on the full spectrum of the clinical class continuum in the diag­nostic evaluation of CVD. Many clinical practice guidelines have been published on the diagnosis and treatment of CVD with the use of GRADE (Grading of Recommenda­tions Assessment, Development and Evaluation) criteria. In this chapter, the focus is on providing the clinician with an integrated diagnostic approach without relying exten­sively on the specic GRADE recommendations.
1,2
which increases with age.3
4
Revised in 2020 and
5–9
32.2 HISTORY OF THE DISEASE
In taking a complete history for CVD, the use of open-ended questions remains paramount to retrieving valid informa­tion about symptoms. This may be especially pertinent for
patients with lower clinical classications, whereby allow­ing for uninterrupted answers often can reveal important symptoms that could be missed with initial closed-ended questions. Simple questions such as “Can you describe what bothers you about your legs?” or even “What brings you to see me today?” provide a launch pad for under­standing a patient’s concerns or how their symptoms affect their daily life. The provider can ask the patient to be more specic about certain aspects of the history and follow up with directed questions and pertinent negatives. This tech­nique of open-ended questions with uninterrupted answers from the patient followed by directed questions should also provide a framework for thorough documentation, which often is required for insurance coverage.
Symptoms from CVD, and particularly varicose veins, can vary from patient to patient and may be vague. While some patients may be asymptomatic, others have symp­toms that can be revealed with a careful history. Some patients may have difculty articulating their concerns or may not realize that these vague symptoms are a manifes­tation of their venous disease. Common symptoms include dull pain, aching, pressure, throbbing, heaviness, tiredness, restlessness, itching, burning, tension of the skin, cramping, and mild edema. Generally, these symptoms are exacer­bated with limb dependency and relieved with elevation or rest. More severe symptoms such as marked edema, der­matitis, hyperpigmentation, corona phlebectatica, atrophie blanche, lipodermatosclerosis, ulceration, and skin ero­sion with hemorrhage can be present solely with super­cial venous valvular incompetence, but often are seen with concomitant deep valvular insufciency. On the opposite end of the CVD spectrum, telangiectasias are often consid­ered cosmetic nuisances and assumed to be asymptomatic, but they too can illicit symptoms similar to varicose veins. Furthermore, their presence in association with correlative symptoms might indicate more severe underlying CVD and warrant further physiologic testing.
In addition to eliciting the presence of symptoms asso­ciated with CVD, it is vital to obtain details regarding both the severity and duration of these symptoms. A history of venous complications such as deep venous thrombosis or supercial thrombophlebitis, major lower extremity trauma, or prior surgical interventions (for treatment of venous pathology, orthopedic procedures, or inguinal or retroperitoneal surgery) should be obtained. Personal risk
9–12
DOI: 10.1201/9781003328971-36
321321
322 Chapter 32 Diagnostic algorithm for chronic venous disorders
https://t.me/med1917
factors such as hypercoagulable state, obesity (document­ing body mass index), occupation with long durations of standing, history of constipation, or periods of prolonged bed rest are also important to document. A family history for diverse types of acute and chronic venous disease as well as blood clots should be obtained. Other relevant informa­tion that should be recorded include the use of venotonic medications, compression hosiery, leg elevation, exercise, or weight loss to ameliorate the symptoms. In women, pain can worsen during the menstrual cycle or pregnancy sec­ondary to increased total body uid volume and/or higher circulating levels of estrogen. Questions should also assess for the presence of concomitant inguinal, perineal, vulvar, and/or vaginal varicosities. For men, a history of varicocele or scrotal varicosities should be sought.
The differential diagnosis of lower extremity pain includes claudication secondary to peripheral arterial disease (calf muscle pain that comes with walking and is relieved with rest) or venous claudication (a more global bursting pain in the lower extremity muscles that comes with walking and is slow to abate with cessation). The dif­ferential diagnosis for leg swelling includes primary lymph­edema or lipedema, and the overlap between lymphedema and CVD can be difcult to parse out in terms of which entity is the primary diagnosis. Other clinical entities that can overlap or have similar symptoms include restless leg syndrome, arthritic disorders, neuropathic pain, complex regional pain syndrome, and other chronic pain syndromes of the lower extremities. The presence of one or more of these diagnoses in addition to clear signs of CVD could cloud the prediction of improvement with treatment of CVD and may warrant modied expectations for both the patient and the provider.
For patients presenting with venous ulcers, documen­tation should include history of prior ulcers, duration of open ulcers, and current rate of healing (e.g., ulcer growth, recession, or stagnation). For the current ulcer, the loca­tion, size, appearance, and whether there are signs and symptoms of infection present should be recorded. Past and current treatment regimens specic to the ulcer are also important to document.
32.3 PHYSICAL EXAMINATION
phlebectatica, and evidence of healed or active ulceration. Location, size, depth, color, and number of ulcerations should be noted. The presence of an underlying congeni­tal arteriovenous or venous malformation may be revealed by the presence of a well-demarcated, purplish pigmented area of the skin (port wine stain) or limb hypertrophy. Inspection should also concentrate on the presence of scars, particularly in the distribution of previous vein stripping, harvest, ablation, and/or phlebectomy.
Rarely, auscultation in the vicinity of varicose veins may
reveal a bruit.
14
Patients with a history of lower extremity
10–12
trauma may have an arteriovenous stula as the underly­ing etiology of varicose veins. Congenital arteriovenous or venous malformations can appear as a large, isolated, grapelike cluster of veins or as a moderate-to-large cluster of smaller vessels appearing with a reddish-bluish hue that penetrate more deeply into fatty and muscular layers of the limb. A bruit is not necessary to conrm this etiology.
Palpation to aid in dening the extent and pattern of CVD is extremely important. With the patient standing, incompetent dilated veins that are not readily visualized can be palpated. This may be true when only telangiecta­sia or venous ulcer is present by inspection. Palpation can also help dene a more complete outline of varicose veins, particularly in the thigh region of overweight patients. Supercial thrombophlebitis can be appreciated as nod­ules, sometimes tender, within varicose veins, while older areas of thrombosis are felt as cords that may or may not be contiguous with other varicosities. A thrill can be pal­pated in some patients with a traumatic arteriovenous s­tula. Careful palpation can also help ascertain more serious signs of infection by detecting the extent of tenderness and induration. Outlining the extent of lipodermatosclerosis by palpation may also guide the physician as to which areas to avoid for phlebectomy or to focus on for perforator treat­ment.
Patients should also be examined in the supine position. An abdominal examination may indicate masses causing venous obstruction. Varicose veins that persist or are slow to dissipate in the supine position may suggest venous out­ow obstruction. Pulse examination of the femoral, pop­liteal, dorsal pedal, and posterior tibial arteries should be performed.
The physical examination should take place in a warm, well-illuminated room with the patient in the standing position. With the patient’s legs completely disrobed, care­ful inspection is conducted and patterns of telangiectasia, reticular veins, and varicose veins are noted. Clusters of tel­angiectasias can appear as skin blemishes or venous lakes (blue-purple compressible papules ranging from 0.2 mm to 1 mm in size). They are often present in the posterolateral thigh and popliteal fossa. ference measurements should be performed to reveal more subtle edema that may not be detected with simple visual assessment. Additionally, inspection for other, more seri­ous signs of CVD in the gaiter area (ankle to mid-calf) is performed. These include dermatitis, hyperpigmentation, lipodermatosclerosis, cellulitis, atrophie blanche, corona
13
Ankle, calf, and thigh circum-
32.4 LABORATORY EXAMINATION
Patients with CVD should have blood and/or urine test­ing depending on their history, physical examination, and treatment plan. Recurrent venous thrombosis, venous ulcer before age 50, or recurrent or recalcitrant venous ulcer may require screening for hypercoagulability (see Chapter sis ulcers or those with suspected infection may require a complete blood count, metabolic panel, and inamma­tory markers. Diabetic patients, especially those present­ing with ulcerations, should have their hemoglobin A checked within the last 3 months as a marker for trends in glucose control, which may provide an actionable treat­ment need.
10).
15–18
Patients with long-standing venous sta-
C
1
32.5 Diagnostic vascular laboratory 323
https://t.me/med1917
32.5 DIAGNOSTIC VASCULAR LABORATORY
In addition to obtaining the history and physical exam­ination, imaging studies are critical to dening the patho­physiology of CVD. Indirect and direct noninvasive testing for CVD performed in a vascular laboratory by an experienced technologist allows characterization of the anatomic and pathologic categories of the CEAP classi­cation. Delineation of venous reux, obstruction, and calf muscle pump dysfunction are important to the diagnostic algorithm, particularly in the presence of varicose veins and venous ulcers. These tests may also be applicable to patients with telangiectasia, depending on accompanying leg symptoms.
32.5.1 Indirect noninvasive tests
Several indirect noninvasive vascular laboratory tests dene the presence and distribution of venous obstruction, reux, and calf muscle pump dysfunction. form of plethysmography (see Chapter 13). These various tests enable most vascular laboratories to measure venous rell time and/or venous outow. For patients with more advanced CVD and venous ulcers, selective use of venous plethysmography is recommended when direct noninvasive testing with the use of duplex ultrasound does not provide denitive diagnostic information.
Typically, venous rell times are determined using pho-
toplethysmography (PPG).
21–24
consecutive plantar exions of the ankle to evacuate the blood from the lower extremity, causing venous pressure
24
to fall.
If the valves are competent, rell to the baseline pressure through the arterial circuit takes longer than 25 seconds. Reaching the baseline plateau in 20 seconds or less indicates venous valvular reux. Selective placement of tourniquets or cuffs inated to approximately 40 mmHg on the thigh or below the knee during subsequent evalua­tions to occlude the great saphenous vein and other super­cial tributaries allows some delineation of supercial versus deep venous valve incompetence.
Venous outow can be measured with impedance and/ or strain gauge plethysmography. the supine position and the legs elevated 15–20 degrees, thigh cuffs are inated to 50–80 mmHg to occlude venous outow. When the venous capacitance pressure equalizes the occluding pressure from the arterial inow of blood, the cuffs are rapidly deated. Just prior to cuff deation, total venous capacitance is compared between the limbs. Limbs with acute or chronic thrombus may have less venous capacitance. The rate of decline over 3 seconds compared to the baseline capacitance evaluates for venous outow obstruction. A leg that is slow to empty could have thrombus more proximally. The presence of developed col­lateral venous circulation or venous duplicity can lead to a false-negative test.
Another use of air plethysmography includes the eval­uation of calf muscle pump dysfunction. air-lled plastic bladder surrounding the lower extremity,
19,20
Many utilize some
7
Seated patients perform
25,26
With the patient in
22,27,28
With an
the system is calibrated with a known volume of air, and changes in air pressure within the bladder are recorded as the patient performs specic maneuvers. The changes in venous capacitance are reected by the changes in calf diameter. In someone with calf muscle pump failure, min­imal blood exits the limb with each ankle dorsiexion, yielding a markedly reduced ejection fraction and a high residual volume. Air plethysmography also evaluates other important physiologic parameters, including venous vol­ume, venous lling index, and residual volume fraction (see Chapter
13).
32.5.2 Direct noninvasive tests
The criterion standard for the assessment of venous valvular incompetence remains duplex ultrasound (see Chapters
11 and 12). mography techniques described, venous duplex allows for assessment of occlusive disease as well as reux and fur­ther provides information on venous anatomy. Described by van Bemmelen and colleagues, a complete lower extremity duplex examination includes visualization of the common femoral, femoral, popliteal, posterior tibial, and great and small saphenous veins. in the standing position, patients use a handrail and dan­gle the leg in question while the examiner insonates the aforementioned venous segments with an appropriately sized cuff placed approximately 5 cm below the probe. Depending on cuff position, ination pressures from 80 mmHg (thigh) to 120 mmHg (foot) are needed to over­come venous hydrostatic pressure and ensure complete venous evacuation. After maintaining an ination for 3 seconds, the cuff is rapidly deated within 0.3 seconds or less. Venous valves with normal function respond rapidly with cuff deation, with 95% demonstrating complete cessation of reverse ow within 0.3 seconds. Therefore, pathophysiologic reversal of ow that is greater than
0.5 seconds in the supercial veins and deep calf veins, greater than 1 second in the femoropopliteal veins, or greater than 0.35–0.5 seconds in the perforator veins is considered abnormal, with 0.5 seconds the recommended value in the 2022 SVS/AVF/AVLS practice guidelines.
Duplex ultrasonography is also useful in the identi­cation of perforating veins. With the legs in an exag­gerated reverse Trendelenburg or sitting position, duplex can be used to visualize perforating veins along the medial and lateral calf. Outward ow from the deep to the supercial venous system with calf compression or exion may indicate incompetence. Others have looked at the overall diameter of perforating veins, stating that incompetence is present if the diameter is greater than
3.5 mm.
33,34
Both the provider and the vascular lab should be procient in the identication of large perfo­rators of the lower leg that communicate between the deep and supercial venous systems. In addition, even after removal of axial supercial veins from the lower leg, a large perforator may be present and contribute to continued venous hypertension. This evaluation becomes increasingly important in the presence of recalcitrant or recurrent venous ulcers.
7,9
Similar to some of the plethys-
29–31
While examined
9,32
32