Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3722_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
30 Мб
Скачать
2 Seeing aPatient withaWound
infectious disease referral and surgical debridement should be considered. Depending on the wound care specialist’s discretion, patients may be started on an empiric antibiotic or wait for a microbiologic diagnosis. A swab culture allows the physician to identify the underlying cause of the chronic wound [10].
Site of Cultures: Should be the area of infec­tion in the wound base that may be discolored or hypertrophic with drainage. Wounds should rst be washed with sterile water so that the wound swabs are not taken from heavily contaminated areas that may give false culture results. Once resulted, culture-directed antibiotic therapy can be started or adjusted [10].
13
Fig. 2.9 Chronic wound with bone and joint exposed is highly suspicious for chronic osteomyelitis
2.7 When Should IBiopsy?
HannahK.Park
Bone biopsy is necessary if there is suspicion of bone infection. This can be done with:
1. Ronguer
2. Jamshidi needle
3. Trephine
4. Craig needle
When assessing wound infection, wound biopsy was not shown to assess wound infection differently from wound cultures taken with a wound swab. Assessments did not signicantly differ when specic microorganisms were cultured nor for different wound types. It is rec­ommended to perform a wound swab initially as there is less burden on the patient of enlarging the wound or creating pain/fear compared to a wound biopsy.
However, if the chronic wound is not healing with standard methods, and there are clinical signs of possible skin malignancy, wound biopsy should be performed. Clinical signs to look out for are abnormal wound borders, bleeding, abnor­mal discoloration (black or blue), changing shape and size, and various levels of thickness (Fig.2.9).
1. Excisional biopsy
2. Incisional biopsy
3. Punch biopsy
2.8 How Do IBiopsy aWound?
NicholasAlianello
Most lower extremity wounds can be classied by etiology, the majority being in patients with diabetes in conjunction with peripheral neuropa­thy, ischemia, and sometimes both. A foot and ankle deformity and/or area of increased pressure lends itself to wound formation in the above­mentioned patient.
When to biopsy a wound?
1. When a wound presents in atypical anatomi­cal site (e.g., Dorsum of the foot).
2. Etiology and appearance of wound are atypi­cal and do not fall into normal classication.
3. When a wound fails to improve despite strict adherence to standard wound healing principles.
How to biopsy the wound:
Cleanse wounds with sterile saline. Anesthetize the wound with local anesthesia if needed. Remove full-thickness sample of tissue from center of lesion/ulcer. It is okay to take sam­ples from multiple areas of the wound if the
14
N. Alianello et al.
lesion is big enough. Use a camera and picture to document the wound appearance and location of biopsy to assist pathology in diagnosis.
Incision biopsy: Use a 15-blade and take a full-thickness section of the ulceration. Send the sample in formalin to pathology.
Punch biopsy: Type of incisional biopsy by use of cylindrical blade. Creates full-thickness sample. Comes in multiple sizes – 4 mm and 6 mm are most commonly used for lower extremity wounds. This is also sent in formalin to pathology.
2.9 When Should INot Debride?
NicholasAlianello
1. In ischemic wounds with dry/stable eschars
(Fig.2.10) prior to vascular intervention.
(a) Debridement will only lead to worsening
tissue death and likely expose bone.
(b) Always await vascular intervention to
ensure level of debridement and tissue removal will be adequate to heal.
2. All pressure ulcers with dry stable eschars. Even when these ulcers have adequate perfu­sion you should avoid removing the dry stable eschar. Removing the dry eschar will likely expose bone as these pressure injuries occur at boney prominences of the extremity.
(a) One should focus on enzymatic debride-
ment and avoid sharp debridement until the periphery of the eschar begins to lift from the wound base and becomes mobile. When the eschar breaks down or is loose, then it is adequate to debride (Figs.2.11,
2.12, 2.13, and 2.14).
Fig. 2.10 Dry eschar of second and fth toe
Fig. 2.11 Dry eschar along the heel. DO NOT debride
lesion. Begin Enzymatic debridement with collagenase application to wound base daily
Fig. 2.12 Heel eschar after collagenase application. Eschar begins to loosen from peripheral of wound base and becomes mobile
2 Seeing aPatient withaWound
15
Fig. 2.13 Heel eschar is now mobile enough to remove without exposing bone. Continue collagenase application to assist in brotic tissue removal
Fig. 2.14 Heel eschar with wound base now granular with no exposed bone. It is now ok to return to sharp debridement
3. Pyoderma gangrenosum wounds: Wound management should focus on pathergy avoid­ance. NO debridement, dressing management, and overall disease management with sys­temic medications are mainstay treatment.
2.10 Identifying andManaging
Calciphylaxis
NicholasAlianello
Identication: Start off as small plaques/eschar that worsen and form larger lesions. They form a lacy appearance and are acutely painful (Fig. 2.15). Eventually, the plaques form deep,
Fig. 2.15 Calciphylaxis of lower extremity
ischemic ulcers. Normally found on areas of body with high amounts of adipose tissue (trunk and thighs).
Wound Management: Due to intense pain associated with wounds, sharp debridement is difcult. Enzymatic debridement of brous tis­sue and eschar is best performed with “collage­nase” applied during daily dressing changes. Proper wound dressings are paramount to control moisture balance. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy should be used when wound healing stalls.
The complexity of the diagnosis calls for a total team approach to treat underlying systemic disease.
2.11 When Do IWound Vac?
NicholasAlianello
A wound vac should be used in wounds with depth that need assistance in increasing granulation tissue within the wound base.
In most cases, the wound vac is used as adjunctive therapy after aggressive surgical debridement that leaves a wound with a deep decit (Figs.2.16 and 2.17).
To allow for epidermal growth, a wound base must be granular and must be at the level of the skin. A wound vac uses negative pressure therapy to promote granulation through capillary budding at the wound site. The goal is to increase granula­tion tissue to eliminate wound depth.
16
Fig. 2.16 Deep wound after fourth digit amputation
N. Alianello et al.
Standard treatment protocol calls for pressure to be set at 125mmHg with oscillation between continuous and intermittent suction.
2.12 Ooading
NicholasAlianello
When to ofoad: When wounds occur on the plantar surface of the foot, there is a need to elim­inate the vertical plantar peak pressure associated with walking (diabetic neuropathic foot ulcers).
2.12.1 Options forOoading
1. Total Non-weight Bearing: Crutches,
Wheelchair, Knee Scooter.
2. Total Contact Cast: Gold standard for ofoad-
ing DFUs.
3. Wedge Shoes (Half shoes).
4. Removable Cam Walker with ofoading
pad.
5. Felt/foam pads and donut pads were applied
to surgical shoe.
6. Extra-depth shoe with custom cut-out tri-
laminate insert.
Fig. 2.17 Wound vac placement along wound base of fourth digit amputation
2.12.2 When toMake aChange?
The issue with aggressive ofoading is the impractical nature of requesting a patient to remain off the foot for the lifetime of the wound. Non-compliance is high. The recommendation is that you aggressively ofoad immediately when a wound forms. Recommend strict non-weight bearing (NWB) or Total Contact Cast during the initial treatment plan. As the wound heals and becomes smaller, you can transition to the wedge shoe or ofoading pads (Figs. 2.18, 2.19, 2.20, and 2.21).
Large deep wounds: Strict NWB, Total Contact Cast, Wedge Shoes.
Small, shallow wounds: Felt/Foam Pads, Removable Cam walker, Extra-depth shoe.
2 Seeing aPatient withaWound
17
Fig. 2.20 Ofoading pads
Fig. 2.18 Total contact cast
Fig. 2.19 Wedge shoe
Fig. 2.21 Accommodative padding
18
N. Alianello et al.
2.13 Oxygen Therapy intheTreatment ofChronic Wounds
J.KarimEad and DavidG.Armstrong
Wound healing represents a comprehensive series of well-orchestrated physiological reactions that create an orderly healing cascade [11]. This pro­cess theoretically includes four key overlapping phases: hemostasis, inammation, proliferation, and remodeling. It progresses along a continuum that should result in the restoration of anatomical and functional integrity [12]. Acute wounds in a relatively healthy host will continue through the wound healing cascade quickly due to the robust utilization of intrinsic growth factors, cytokines, and matrix proteins that keep the wound on a well-regulated trajectory [11].
In contrast, chronic wounds manifest when the normal healing cascade is interrupted at one or more points during the phases of wound heal­ing (often stagnating in the inammatory or pro­liferative phases [13]. Various theories have been proposed to explain why some wounds become chronic and non-healing. Despite the etiological differences in chronic wounds, they often share common pathogenic features. Common causes for chronic inammation include various inammatory-based comorbidi­ties, infection, an externally induced pressure injury, devitalized tissue that has been incom-
pletely debrided, mechanical insults from retained foreign body, and hypoxia secondary to ischemia [14]. Initial efforts should focus on correcting or ruling out these causes of wound chronicity. Normal tissue repair is a dynamic process that balances decient and excessive healing (Fig.2.22).
2.13.1 The Simple SALSA Wound Treatment Guideline: Vertical andHorizontal Approach
• If a wound does not reduce in size by 40% or
more after 4 weeks of standard-of-care treatment, consider the utilization of alterna­tive advanced therapies [15, 16].
– The “Vertical” approach is to ll/provide
coverage for vital structures using negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT).
NPWT promotes localized perfusion, increased granulation tissue formation, and facilitates wound closure.
– The “Horizontal” component is achieved
via skin grafting (bioengineered or autolo­gous split-thickness skin grafts).
Ofoading is a vital component of wound healing that should be integrated in any treatment algorithm.
• If the wound is older than 3–4months or not
responsive after 4weeks of therapy; consider biopsy to rule out malignancy).
Fig. 2.22 Wound healing is a balance
2 Seeing aPatient withaWound
19
*SALSA=The Southwestern Academic Limb
Salvage Alliance (SALSA).
Chronic wounds are comprised of pro­inammatory cytokines and proteases that disrupt extracellular matrix communication with other cells in the wound [16]. During these inammatory states, there is increased oxygen consumption and vascular dysfunction within the wound environment causing hypoxic tissue formation [17]. Oxygen is recognizably essential for life itself, and it is no less essential for wound healing and tissue repair. It is a necessary co-factor for several oxygen-dependent biochemical processes that are vital in the wound healing cascade. The two main oxygen-based therapies include hyperbaric oxygen and topically based oxygen therapies.
2.13.2 Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy
Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) might be considered in situations of chronic wounds that have not responded to the standard of care. Today there are several approved applications and indications/contraindications for HBOT [18]. HBOT mechanism of action on chronic wounds includes localized vascular modulation, angiogenesis, leukocyte oxidative killing, growth factor proliferation, and immune cell revitalization (Fig.2.23) [19]. Treatment protocols for HBOT vary depending on the suspected pathophysiology.
Simply put, HBOT is utilized to help restore abnormal tissue oxygen tension by applying basic physical gas laws. In certain circumstances, hyperbaric oxygen therapy represents the primary treatment modality, while in others it is an adjunct to surgical or pharmacologic interventions. Treatment is typically performed in either a mono- or a multi-place chamber. In a monoplace
chamber, a single patient occupies an entire chamber and is pressurized with 100% oxygen. The patient breathes the ambient chamber oxy­gen directly. Whereas a multi-place chamber holds two or more people and is pressurized with compressed air while patients breathe 100% oxygen (with masks, head hoods, or endotracheal tubes) [20]. It should be noted that HBOT studies have been ridiculed for signicant bias and large numbers of dropouts or adverse events. There will likely be a decline in the use of HBOT therapy without robust evidence regarding optimal therapy for specic wounds.
2.13.3 Topical Oxygen Therapy
Over the years, there has been some controversy as to whether topical oxygen therapy (TOT) can be utilized as a wound healing agent (Fig.2.24). TOT has been in clinical use for over 50years with encouraging pre-clinical and clinical studies [21]. However, early studies were observational, including several comparative cohort studies. Even when conducted prospectively, lack of randomized (blinded) studies have led many to suspect its efcacy in the treatment of chronic wounds [22].
There are three general types of delivery sys-
tems for TOT:
1. Continuous delivery of oxygen (CDO) at neg­ligible pressures.
2. Low constant pressure delivery in a contained chamber.
3. Higher cyclically pressurized (humidied delivery in a contained extremity chamber).
As previously mentioned, chronic wounds are
typically hypoxic, in that the partial pressure of
HBOT
Fig. 2.23 Oxygen and its potential effects on wound healing
fibroblast
replaction
collagen angiogensis
immune
cell
modulation
Wound
Healing
20
N. Alianello et al.
O2 Modality
Topical O2 Therapy
HBOT
Fig. 2.24 Head-to-head HBOT vs TOT
Indications Relative Cost Level of evidence
VLU, DFU
(Neuro/Neuro ischemic)
Neuropathic, ischemic
ulcers
oxygen (pO2) at the central aspect of the wound is often insufcient to support vital biochemical pro­cesses required for wound healing and tissue repair. Providing localized topical oxygen can potentially raise pO2 levels to better optimize enzymatic/cellular function. It should be empha­sized that on a molecular level, oxygen is the rate limiting substrate for many vital biochemical reac­tions in cellular metabolism. Molecular oxygen is, of course, also necessary for the synthesis of nitric oxide (NO) that regulates vasodilation [22].
Oxygen-dependent processes, relevant to
wound healing, include the following:
Problems w/ evidence
+++
+++
Several RCTs,
observational, meta-
analysis positive results
Few RCT's showing
efficacy
Numerous devices difficult to compare
Observer bias, high
drop out rates/ adverse
events
• Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)
levels.
• Angiogenesis.
• Enhance collagen deposition.
Three recent systematic reviews with meta­analyses focused on the clinical effectiveness of TOT for healing chronic diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) [2224]. All three studies indicated that TOT (using CDO and cyclically pressurized devices) can signicantly improve wound healing among people with chronic DFUs [23, 25].
• Mitochondrial-driven adenosine triphosphate (ATP).
– Production for chemical/cellular energy.
• Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase.
– Production of ROS (“respiratory burst”)
involved in signal transduction of growth factors, cellular recruitment, and bacterial killing.
In animal models, TOT mechanism of action
has been demonstrated to increase/improve the following:
• Central wound pO2 from a baseline of 5–7mmHg to levels of >40mmHg 4min into treatment.
2.14 Skin Substitutes andMatrixes Demystied
J.KarimEad and DavidG.Armstrong
Advances in cell biology and tissue engineering have led to an increase in the quantity and quality of biological wound dressings, also referred to as biologics, skin substitutes, or matrixes [26]. Skin substitutes are a diverse group of biologics or biosynthetic materials that can provide tempo­rary or permanent coverage of open or ulcerated skin lesions (Fig. 2.25) [27]. These advanced modalities can be a combination of cellular or acellular tissue products, both human and animal derived such as from human placenta, foreskin allografts, sh scales, and other sources. It is
2 Seeing aPatient withaWound
21
Skin
Substitutes
Tissue
Layer
Epidermal Dermal Epi-Derm
Fig. 2.25 Skin substitutes
essential purpose is to stimulate the host to regenerate lost tissue and replace the wound with functional skin.
Cellular-based therapies, also called bioengi­neered cellular therapies are comprised of skin cells (broblasts, keratinocytes, or both) that cre­ate a new source of growth factors, cytokines, and enzymes that promote wound healing and tissue regeneration. For example, one possible treatment option for non-healing ulcers is the use of platelet-rich plasma or platelet-rich brin, which have recently been developed into multilayered patches comprising autologous leucocytes, platelets, and brin. These patches can be made at the bedside without adding any reagents. This autologous therapy can potentially aid in the release of several key cytokines and growth factors involved in tissue repair, angiogenesis, and inammation [27].
Goals for treating acute and chronic wounds with skin substitutes are to:
• Provide temporary coverage or permanent
wound closure.
• Reduce healing time.
• Reduce post-operative contracture.
• Improve function.
• To decrease morbidity from more invasive
treatments such as skin grafting.
Chronic non-healing wounds are often second­ary to systemic pathological processes, it is critical that skilled medical personnel encompass a holis-
Origin
Allograft Autograft Xenograft
tic approach in their treatment pathways. In 2019, Samsell etal. conducted a cost-effectiveness study on eight skin substitutes, they found that the costs of a skin substitute itself did not necessarily cor­relate with its healing efcacy. Snyder etal. con­ducted a follow-up head-to-head comparative analysis on ve skin substitutes and found that an autologous-based graft was more cost-efcient as an advanced therapy in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers when compared to four other advanced cellular- based tissue products [28].
Armstrong etal. retrospectively analyzed data from the Medicare Limited Dataset [29]. They took a close look at patients receiving care for lower extremity diabetic foot ulcerations treated with advanced treatment (AT) versus no advanced treatment (NAT). The advanced treatment included patients receiving skin substitutes (cellular and acellular dermal grafts) derived mostly from human placental membranes and animal tissue sources [22].
Key variables in the study included major and minor amputations, emergency department (ED) visits, and hospital readmissions. It was discovered that AT for diabetic ulcers resulted in fewer Major and Minor amputations, ED visits, and Re-Admissions when compared to NAT.
These ndings emphasize the importance of choosing the appropriate advanced skin substitutes that are both effective and cost efcient when considering a treatment plan for patients with non-healing lower extremity wounds.
22
N. Alianello et al.
2.15 This Patient Needs tobeAdmitted Now
J.KarimEad and DavidG.Armstrong
The incidence of skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI) in the general population has been increasing in recent years. Consequently, increas­ing the number of patients being seen and treated in the Emergency Department (ED), as well as admitted to the hospital. It is vital for medical personnel to utilize evidence-based consensus guidelines for the management of suspected SSTI [30]. These conditions are subdivided into spe­cic categories (non-purulent, purulent, ulcer­ative, and recurrent/refractory SSTI) (Fig.2.26). Recent data suggests that lower extremity-based ED visits generate 81.2% hospital admission rate with an annual bill of at least $1.2 billion in the United States alone [12].
The likelihood of hospital admission, amputa­tion, and other subsequent adverse outcomes is associated with three key factors [31]:
The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) recommends clinicians to consider the possibility of infection occurring in any foot/ lower extremity wound (especially in the diabetic patient) [29]. If an in-ofce patient presents with signicant tissue loss, a thorough history and physical exam should be performed. If there are obvious signs of either infection or ischemia, hospital admission should be advised (Fig.2.27).
Redness/Pain
Skin Warmth
Swelling/
Purulence
1. Wound severity (degree of tissue loss)
2. Ischemia
3. Foot infection
Non Purulent SSTI:
• cellulitis
• ersipelas
Purulent SSTI:
• Abscesses
• Cellulitis w/ pustules
Ulcerative SSTI
• Chronic ulceration (lower extremity)
Recurrent/Refactory SSTI
• More than 3 occurences per year of either non-purulent or purulent SSTI
Classic Signs of Infection
Fig. 2.27 Evidence of infection includes classic signs of inammation
Fig. 2.26 SSTI denitions