Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_894_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Preface to the Third Edition
- •Dedications and Acknowledgments
- •Contents
- •Contributors
- •Perineal Body
- •Anococcygeal Ligament
- •Pelvic Floor Muscles
- •Puborectalis Muscle
- •Iliococcygeus Muscle
- •Pubococcygeus Muscle
- •Introduction
- •Anal Canal Epithelium
- •Internal Anal Sphincter
- •Conjoined Longitudinal Muscle
- •External Anal Sphincter
- •Mesorectum
- •Presacral Fascia
- •Retrosacral Fascia
- •Waldeyer’s Fascia
- •Denonvilliers’ Fascia
- •Anorectal Spaces
- •Perianal Space
- •Intersphincteric Space
- •Submucous Space
- •Ischioanal/Ischiorectal Space
- •Supralevator Space
- •Retrorectal Space
- •Lateral Ligaments
- •Rectal Blood Supply
- •Superior Rectal Artery
- •Middle Rectal Artery
- •Inferior Rectal Artery
- •Physiology
- •Colonic Absorption
- •Colonic Motility
- •Rectal Function
- •The Pelvic Floor
- •The Anal Sphincter Complex
- •Internal Anal Sphincter (IAS)
- •Conjoined Longitudinal Muscle
- •References
- •2: Patient Evaluation
- •Introduction
- •Anatomy
- •History
- •Chief Complaint
- •Bowel Habits
- •Personal History
- •Common Complaints
- •Bleeding
- •Pain
- •Itching
- •Incontinence
- •Constipation
- •Physical Examination
- •Abdominal Examination
- •Anorectal Examination
- •Visual Inspection
- •External Palpation
- •Digital Rectal Examination
- •Diagnostic Studies
- •Anoscopy
- •Proctoscopy
- •Flexible Sigmoidoscopy
- •Endoluminal Ultrasound
- •Computed Tomography
- •Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- •Physiologic Testing
- •Summary
- •References
- •3: Anorectal Physiology Testing
- •Introduction
- •Techniques
- •Anorectal Manometry
- •Balloon Expulsion
- •Electromyography
- •Needle Electrode EMG
- •Surface Electrode EMG
- •Rectal Pressure Testing (Manometry)
- •Cinedefecography
- •Magnetic Resonance Defecography
- •Pudendal Nerve Terminal Motor Latency Testing (PNTML)
- •Clinical Considerations
- •Hirschsprung’s Disease
- •Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS)
- •Anismus
- •Perineal Descent
- •Fecal Incontinence
- •Summary
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Anorectal Malformations
- •Embryology
- •Associated Anomalies
- •Presentation
- •Management
- •Divided Colostomy
- •Posterior Sagittal Anorectoplasty
- •Bowel Management
- •Hirschsprung’s Disease
- •Pathophysiology
- •Presentation
- •Neonatal Obstruction
- •Childhood Constipation
- •Hirschsprung’s-Associated Enterocolitis (HAEC)
- •Diagnosis
- •Contrast Enema
- •Anorectal Manometry
- •Rectal Biopsy
- •Suction vs. Full-Thickness
- •Management
- •Surgical Approaches
- •Swenson
- •Duhamel
- •Soave
- •Modern Approach
- •Long-Segment Disease
- •Complications
- •Incontinence
- •Constipation
- •HAEC
- •Reoperation
- •Laparoscopic-Associated Anorectoplasty (LAARP)
- •Fistula-in-ano/Perianal Abscess
- •Anal Fissure
- •Rectal Prolapse
- •Solitary Rectal Ulcer Syndrome (SRUS)
- •Sexual Abuse
- •References
- •5: Perioperative Management
- •Introduction
- •Preoperative Care
- •Patient Education
- •Aspirin Use
- •Bowel Preparation
- •Perioperative Care
- •Antibiotic Prophylaxis
- •Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) Prophylaxis
- •Perioperative Intravenous Fluids
- •Postoperative Care
- •Enhanced Recovery
- •Patient Education
- •Antibiotics
- •Sitz Baths
- •Wound Care
- •Diet
- •Bowel Regimen
- •Pain Management
- •Topical Analgesia
- •Outpatient Follow-Up
- •Ambulatory Surgery Outcomes
- •Complications After Anorectal Surgery
- •Acute Complications
- •Infection
- •Urinary Retention
- •Hemorrhage
- •Chronic Complications
- •Fecal Incontinence
- •Anal Stenosis
- •Chronic Pain
- •Summary
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Positioning
- •Anesthetic Techniques
- •General Anesthesia
- •Regional Anesthesia
- •Monitored Anesthetic Care (MAC)
- •Local Anesthesia
- •Lighting
- •Instrumentation
- •Anoscopes
- •Speculums
- •Retractors
- •Supporting Material
- •References
- •7: Functional Anorectal Disorders
- •Introduction
- •Anismus
- •Perineal Descent Syndrome
- •Solitary Rectal Ulcer Syndrome
- •Sigmoidocele
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Abdominal Approaches
- •Open Rectopexy
- •Laparoscopic Rectopexy
- •Mesh Techniques
- •Laparoscopic Mesh Rectopexy
- •Results of Mesh Rectopexy
- •Ventral Mesh Rectopexy
- •Resection Rectopexy
- •Perineal Approaches
- •Perineal Rectosigmoidectomy
- •Delorme
- •Anal Encirclement
- •Recurrent Rectal Prolapse
- •Rectal Intussusception
- •References
- •9: Fecal Incontinence
- •Introduction
- •Normal Continence
- •Evaluation
- •Treatment
- •Conservative Management
- •Non-surgical Devices
- •Surgical Management
- •Sphincter Augmentation
- •Malone Antegrade Continence Enema
- •Colostomy
- •References
- •10: Anorectal Abscess and Fistula in Ano
- •Introduction
- •Anatomy
- •Abscess
- •Etiology and Pathophysiology
- •Evaluation
- •Symptoms
- •Physical Examination
- •Diagnostic Imaging
- •Treatment
- •General Principles
- •Operative Management
- •Catheter Drainage
- •Primary Fistulotomy
- •Antibiotics
- •Postoperative Care
- •Complications
- •Recurrent Abscess
- •Incontinence
- •Special Considerations
- •Necrotizing Anorectal Infection
- •Treatment
- •Management
- •Fistula-in-Ano
- •Pathophysiology
- •Etiology
- •Evaluation
- •Symptoms
- •Physical Examination
- •Imaging
- •Treatment
- •General Principles
- •Operative Management
- •Fistulotomy
- •Staged Fistulotomy
- •Endoanal Advancement Flap
- •Anal Fistula Plug
- •Fibrin Glue
- •Stem Cells
- •Summary
- •References
- •11: Rectovaginal Fistula
- •Introduction
- •Etiology
- •History
- •Medical Management
- •Crohn’s-Related RVF
- •Surgical Management
- •Simple Fistula Repair
- •Endorectal Advancement Flap
- •Biologic Repairs
- •Overlapping Sphincteroplasty (OS)
- •Perineoproctotomy (PP)
- •Complex Fistula Repair
- •Bulbocavernosus Muscle Flap
- •Gracilis Muscle Transposition Flap (GMTF)
- •Transperineal Omental Flap (TPOF)
- •Resection Repair
- •Bricker Patch Repair
- •Stent Repair
- •Crohn’s-Related RVF Repair
- •Ileoanal Pouch–Vaginal Fistula (IPVF) Repair
- •Diversion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Rectocele
- •Diagnosis
- •Physical Examination
- •Imaging/Anorectal Physiologic Tests
- •Treatment
- •Nonoperative
- •Operative
- •Transvaginal (Posterior Colporrhaphy)
- •Transperineal
- •Transanal
- •Laparoscopic Rectocele Repair Technique
- •Diagnosis
- •Treatment
- •Medical
- •Surgical
- •Apical Prolapse
- •Enteroceles
- •Perineal Hernia
- •Primary Perineal Hernia
- •Secondary Perineal Hernia
- •Transabdominal Repair
- •Laparoscopic Repair
- •Perineal Repair
- •Summary
- •References
- •13: Pruritus Ani
- •Introduction
- •Etiology
- •Idiopathic Pruritus Ani
- •Dietary Factors
- •Secondary Pruritus Ani
- •Infectious Agents
- •Viruses
- •Parasites
- •Organic Colorectal Conditions
- •Dermatologic
- •Neoplastic Disease
- •Systemic Diseases
- •Psychological
- •Drugs
- •Patient Evaluation
- •History
- •Physical Examination
- •Treatment
- •Recent Advances
- •Summary
- •References
- •Anal Fissure
- •Introduction
- •Pathogenesis
- •Presentation
- •Medical Therapy
- •Operative Therapy
- •PLIS Operative Techniques
- •Alternative Treatment Concepts
- •Subcutaneous Fissurotomy
- •Dilation
- •Flaps
- •Simple Cutaneous Advancement Flap
- •V-Y Advancement Flap
- •Unique Situations
- •Post-PLIS Fissure
- •Hypotonic Fissure
- •Extreme Pain
- •HIV-Related Fissure
- •Non-healing Wounds
- •Anal Stenosis
- •Introduction
- •Pathogenesis
- •Presentation
- •Medical Treatment
- •Dilation
- •Operative Therapy
- •Stricturoplasty
- •Flaps
- •Mucosal Advancement Flap
- •Y-V Advancement Flap
- •V-Y Advancement Flap
- •House Flap
- •Diamond-Shaped Flap
- •Rotational “S” Flaps
- •References
- •15: Pilonidal Disease
- •Background
- •Etiology
- •Clinical Presentation/Diagnosis
- •Treatment
- •Non-operative Management
- •Operative/Excisional Management
- •Basic Procedures
- •Complex Procedures
- •Karydakis Flap
- •Cleft Lift Procedure
- •Rhomboid/Limberg Flap
- •Disease Recurrence
- •References
- •16: Perianal Hidradenitis Suppurativa
- •Introduction
- •Pathogenesis
- •Bacteria
- •Imaging
- •Medical Treatment
- •Antibiotics
- •Steroids
- •Anti-TNF Agents
- •Surgical Treatment
- •Squamous Cell Carcinoma
- •References
- •17: Hemorrhoidal Disease
- •Introduction
- •Anatomy
- •Pathophysiology
- •Etiology
- •Evaluation
- •Symptoms
- •Examination
- •Treatment
- •General Principles
- •Internal Hemorrhoids
- •Flavonoids
- •Rubber Band Ligation
- •Infrared Photocoagulation
- •Sclerotherapy
- •Cryotherapy
- •Electrocautery
- •Dilatation
- •Internal Anal Sphincterotomy
- •Transanal Hemorrhoidal Dearterialization (THD)
- •External Hemorrhoids
- •Acute Thrombosis
- •Operative Hemorrhoidectomy
- •Alternate Energy Sources
- •Special Considerations
- •Summary
- •References
- •Introduction
- •History
- •Physical Examination
- •Anoscopy/Rigid Proctoscopy
- •Imaging/Testing
- •Acute Pelvic Pain
- •Thrombosed External Hemorrhoid
- •Anal Fissure
- •Anorectal Abscess
- •Pruritus Ani
- •Hidradenitis Suppuritiva
- •Infectious
- •Gonorrhea
- •Chlamydia
- •Herpes Simplex/Zoster
- •Syphilis (Treponema Pallidum)
- •Chancroid (Haemophilus Ducreyi)
- •Granuloma Inguinale (Calymmatobacterium Granulomatis)
- •Perianal Crohn’s Disease
- •Proctitis/Pouchitis
- •Radiation
- •Anal Stricture
- •Anal/Rectal Cancer
- •Rectal Prolapse
- •Retrorectal Tumors
- •Prostatitis
- •Gynecological Causes
- •Neurogenic Pain
- •Chronic Pelvic Pain
- •Urogynecological Causes
- •Pelvic Floor Pain Syndrome
- •Levator Ani Syndrome
- •Proctalgia Fugax
- •Coccygodynia
- •Pudendal Neuralgia
- •Summary
- •References
- •19: Anal Neoplasms
- •Introduction
- •Anatomy
- •Anal Squamous Cell Cancer
- •Etiology
- •Diagnosis
- •Staging
- •Treatment
- •Salvage Treatment
- •Functional Results After Radiotherapy
- •Anal Adenocarcinoma
- •Anal Melanoma
- •Sarcoma/Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST)
- •Paget’s Disease
- •High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion
- •Anal Margin Squamous Cell Cancer
- •Anal Margin Basal Cell Cancer
- •References
- •20: Anal Intraepitheial Neoplasia
- •Introduction
- •Prevention
- •Screening
- •Diagnosis
- •Treatment
- •Expectant Management
- •Ongoing Surveillance
- •Summary
- •References
- •21: Rectal Carcinoma: Imaging for Staging
- •Introduction
- •Imaging Modalities
- •Endorectal Ultrasound
- •Lymph Node Involvement
- •Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- •MRI Technique
- •Lymph Node Involvement
- •Pelvic Side Wall Lymph Nodes
- •Extramural Vascular Invasion
- •Evaluating Tumour Response
- •Hepatic Metastases
- •Pulmonary Metastases
- •Peritoneal Metastases
- •Summary
- •References
- •22: Rectal Carcinoma: Operative Treatment, Transanal
- •Local Approaches to Rectal Cancer
- •Transanal Excision (TAE)
- •Transanal Endoscopic Surgery
- •Intraoperative Complications
- •Peritoneal Entry
- •Conversion
- •Positive Margins
- •Postoperative Complications
- •Functional Outcomes
- •Future Directions: Transanal TME (TATME)
- •Summary
- •References
- •23: Rectal Cancer: Operative Treatment Transabdominal
- •Overview
- •Preoperative Evaluation
- •Preoperative Imaging Studies
- •Staging
- •T2N0 Rectal Cancer
- •Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
- •Distant Metastatic (M1) Disease
- •Surgical Considerations
- •Radical Resection
- •Total Mesorectal Excision
- •Circumferential Resection Margin
- •Distal Resection Margin
- •Reconstruction Options Following Low Anterior Resection
- •Temporary Diversion Following Low Anterior Resection
- •Abdominoperineal Resection
- •Abdominal Dissection: Minimally Invasive Versus Open Technique
- •Perineal Dissection: Prone Versus Lithotomy Positioning
- •Perineal Reconstruction Options
- •Surgical Technique
- •Blood Supply
- •Autonomic Pelvic Nervous System
- •Open Abdominal Dissection
- •Robotic Total Mesorectal Excision
- •Transanal Extraction Techniques
- •Postoperative Care
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
- •Total Mesorectal Excision
- •Neoadjuvant Therapy
- •Chemoradiation
- •Intraoperative Radiation Therapy
- •Endoluminal Brachytherapy
- •Surgery Related Outcomes Post Chemoradiation
- •Adjuvant Therapy
- •Adjuvant Chemotherapy
- •Induction vs. Adjuvant Chemotherapy
- •Adjuvant Chemotherapy Following PCR
- •Adjuvant Radiotherapy
- •Chemoradiation
- •Metastatic (Stage IV) Rectal Cancer
- •Recurrent Rectal Cancer
- •Summary
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Benign
- •Adenomatous Polyps
- •Treatment
- •Natural History
- •Malignant Polyps
- •Large Rectal Villous Tumors
- •Hyperplastic Polyps
- •Juvenile Polyps
- •Cronkhite-Canada Syndrome
- •Hamartomatous Polyps
- •Lipomas
- •Hemangiomas
- •Solitary Rectal Ulcer Syndrome/Colitis Cystica Profunda
- •Leiomyomas
- •Malignant
- •Leiomyosacrcoma
- •Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST)
- •Carcinoid Tumors
- •Carcinoid Carcinomas
- •Lymphoma
- •Retrorectal/Presacral Tumors
- •Melanoma
- •References
- •26: Retrorectal (Presacral) Tumors
- •Introduction
- •Anatomy
- •Congenital Lesions
- •Cystic Lesions
- •Developmental Cysts
- •Duplication Cysts (Enterogenous)
- •Tail Gut Cysts (Cystic Harmatomas)
- •Anterior Sacral Meningocele
- •Solid Lesions
- •Sacrococcygeal Chordomas
- •Neurogenic Tumors
- •Osseous Tumors
- •Miscellaneous Tumors
- •Imaging
- •Preoperative Biopsy
- •Management
- •Surgical Approach
- •Posterior Approach
- •Outcomes
- •Malignant Lesions
- •Benign Lesions
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Sexually Transmitted Anorectal Disorders
- •Bacterial Infections
- •Gonorrhea
- •Chlamydia Trachomatis: Lymphogranuloma Venereum (LGV)
- •Chancroid
- •Granuloma Inguinale
- •Syphilis
- •Viral Infections
- •Herpes Simplex

60
I. M. Paquette and J. I. S. Bleier
Defecography: anorectal deformities with a functional origin (prolapse, intussusception, rectocele).
Radiol Med. 1994;87(6):789–95.
112. Soares FA, Regadas FS, Murad-Regadas SM,
Rodrigues LV, Silva FR, Escalante RD, etal. Role
of age, bowel function and parity on anorectocele pathogenesis according to cinedefecography and anal manometry evaluation. Color Dis.
2009;11(9):947–50.
113. van Dam JH, Ginai AZ, Gosselink MJ, Huisman
WM, Bonjer HJ, Hop WC, etal. Role of defecography in predicting clinical outcome of rectocele
repair. Dis Colon Rectum. 1997;40(2):201–7.
114. Thapar RB, Patankar RV, Kamat RD, Thapar RR,
Chemburkar V. MR defecography for obstructed
defecation syndrome. Indian J Radiol Imaging.
2015;25(1):25–30.
115. Reginelli A, Di Grezia G, Gatta G, Iacobellis F,
Rossi C, Giganti M, etal. Role of conventional radiology and MRi defecography of pelvic oor hernias.
BMC Surg. 2013;13(Suppl 2):S53.
116. Piloni V, Tosi P, Vernelli M. MR-defecography in
obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS): technique,
diagnostic criteria and grading. Tech Coloproctol.
2013;17(5):501–10.
117. Cappabianca S, Reginelli A, Iacobellis F, Granata
V, Urciuoli L, Alabiso ME, et al. Dynamic MRI
defecography vs. entero-colpo-cysto-defecography
in the evaluation of midline pelvic oor hernias
in female pelvic oor disorders. Int J Color Dis.
2011;26(9):1191–6.
118. Mortele KJ, Fairhurst J. Dynamic MR defecography of the posterior compartment: indications, techniques and MRI features. Eur J Radiol.
2007;61(3):462–72.
119. Hetzer FH, Andreisek G, Tsagari C, Sahrbacher
U, Weishaupt D. MR defecography in patients
with fecal incontinence: imaging ndings and
their effect on surgical management. Radiology.
2006;240(2):449–57.
120. Roos JE, Weishaupt D, Wildermuth S, Willmann
JK, Marincek B, Hilker PR.Experience of 4 years
with open MR defecography: pictorial review of
anorectal anatomy and disease. Radiographics.
2002;22(4):817–32.
121. Paetzel C, Strotzer M, Furst A, Rentsch M, Lenhart
M, Feuerbach S. Dynamic MR defecography for
diagnosis of combined functional disorders of the
pelvic oor in proctology. Rofo. 2001;173(5):410–5.
122. Hilker PR, Debatin JF, Schwizer W, Schoenenberger
AW, Fried M, Marincek B.MR defecography: depiction of anorectal anatomy and pathology. J Comput
Assist Tomogr. 1998;22(5):749–55.
123. Vitton V, Vignally P, Barthet M, Cohen V, Durieux
O, Bouvier M, etal. Dynamic anal endosonography
and MRI defecography in diagnosis of pelvic oor
disorders: comparison with conventional defecography. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54(11):1398–404.
124. Pradal-Prat D, Mares P, Peray P, Lopez S, GagnardLandra C.Pudendal nerve motor latency correlation
by age and sex. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol.
1998;38(8):491–6.
125. Laurberg S, Swash M.Effects of aging on the anorectal sphincters and their innervation. Dis Colon
Rectum. 1989;32(9):737–42.
126. Vernava AM 3rd, Longo WE, Daniel GL.Pudendal
neuropathy and the importance of EMG evaluation of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum.
1993;36(1):23–7.
127. Vaccaro CA, Cheong DM, Wexner SD, Nogueras
JJ, Salanga VD, Hanson MR, etal. Pudendal neuropathy in evacuatory disorders. Dis Colon Rectum.
1995;38(2):166–71.
128. Loganathan A, Schloithe AC, Hakendorf P, Liyanage
CM, Costa M, Wattchow D. Prolonged pudendal
nerve terminal motor latency is associated with
decreased resting and squeeze pressures in the intact
anal sphincter. Color Dis. 2013;15(11):1410–5.
129. Suilleabhain CB, Horgan AF, McEnroe L, Poon FW,
Anderson JH, Finlay IG, et al. The relationship of
pudendal nerve terminal motor latency to squeeze
pressure in patients with idiopathic fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44(5):666–71.
130. Chen AS, Luchtefeld MA, Senagore AJ, Mackeigan
JM, Hoyt C. Pudendal nerve latency. Does it predict outcome of anal sphincter repair? Dis Colon
Rectum. 1998;41(8):1005–9.
131. Vaccaro CA, Cheong DM, Wexner SD, Salanga VD,
Phillips RC, Hanson MR. Role of pudendal nerve
terminal motor latency assessment in constipated
patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 1994;37(12):1250–4.
132. Lubowski DZ, Swash M, Nicholls RJ, Henry
MM. Increase in pudendal nerve terminal motor
latency with defaecation straining. Br J Surg.
1988;75(11):1095–7.
133. Rakas P, Liapis A, Karandreas A, Creatsas
G.Pudendal nerve terminal motor latency in women
with genuine stress incontinence and prolapse.
Gynecol Obstet Investig. 2001;51(3):187–90.
134. Pfeifer J, Salanga VD, Agachan F, Weiss EG, Wexner
SD. Variation in pudendal nerve terminal motor
latency according to disease. Dis Colon Rectum.
1997;40(1):79–83.
135. Birnbaum EH, Stamm L, Rafferty JF, Fry RD,
Kodner IJ, Fleshman JW. Pudendal nerve terminal motor latency inuences surgical outcome in
treatment of rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum.
1996;39(11):1215–21.
136. Tomita R, Igarashi S, Ikeda T, Koshinaga T, Fujisaki
S, Tanjoh K.Pudendal nerve terminal motor latency
in patients with or without soiling 5 years or more
after low anterior resection for lower rectal cancer.
World J Surg. 2007;31(2):403–8.
137. Matsuoka H, Masaki T, Sugiyama M, Atomi
Y. Pudendal nerve terminal motor latency in
evaluation of evacuatory disorder following low
anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. HepatoGastroenterology. 2007;54(77):1426–9.
138. Lim JF, Tjandra JJ, Hiscock R, Chao MW, Gibbs
P. Preoperative chemoradiation for rectal cancer

3 Anorectal Physiology Testing
61
causes prolonged pudendal nerve terminal motor
latency. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49(1):12–9.
139. Snooks SJ, Setchell M, Swash M, Henry MM.Injury
to innervation of pelvic oor sphincter musculature
in childbirth. Lancet. 1984;2(8402):546–50.
140. Wexner SD, Marchetti F, Salanga VD, Corredor
C, Jagelman DG. Neurophysiologic assessment of the anal sphincters. Dis Colon Rectum.
1991;34(7):606–12.
141. Lefaucheur J, Yiou R, Thomas C.Pudendal nerve terminal motor latency: age effects and technical considerations. Clin Neurophysiol. 2001;112(3):472–6.
142. Tam PK. Hirschsprung’s disease: a bridge for science and surgery. J Pediatr Surg. 2016;51(1):18–22.
143. Zuelzer WW, Wilson JL. Functional intestinal
obstruction on a congenital neurogenic basis in
infancy. Am J Dis Child. 1948;75(1):40–64.
144. Whitehouse FR, Kernohan JW. Myenteric plexus
in congenital megacolon; study of 11 cases. Arch
Intern Med (Chic). 1948;82(1):75–111.
145. Tang YF, Chen JG, An HJ, Jin P, Yang L, Dai ZF,
etal. High-resolution anorectal manometry in newborns: normative values and diagnostic utility in
Hirschsprung disease. Neurogastroenterol Motil.
2014;26(11):1565–72.
146. Martellucci J. Low anterior resection syndrome:
a treatment algorithm. Dis Colon Rectum.
2016;59(1):79–82.
147. Carrillo A, Enriquez-Navascues JM, Rodriguez A,
Placer C, Mugica JA, Saralegui Y, et al. Incidence
and characterization of the anterior resection syndrome through the use of the LARS scale (low anterior resection score). Cir Esp. 2016;94(3):137–43.
148. Hou XT, Pang D, Lu Q, Yang P, Jin SL, Zhou YJ,
et al. Validation of the Chinese version of the low
anterior resection syndrome score for measuring
bowel dysfunction after sphincter-preserving surgery among rectal cancer patients. Eur J Oncol Nurs.
2015;19(5):495–501.
149. Samalavicius NE, Dulskas A, Lasinskas M, Smailyte
G. Validity and reliability of a Lithuanian version
of low anterior resection syndrome score. Tech
Coloproctol. 2016;20:215–20.
150. O'Riordain MG, Molloy RG, Gillen P, Horgan A,
Kirwan WO.Rectoanal inhibitory reex following
low stapled anterior resection of the rectum. Dis
Colon Rectum. 1992;35(9):874–8.
151. Bleier JI, Maykel JA.Outcomes following proctectomy. Surg Clin North Am. 2013;93(1):89–106.
152. Podzemny V, Pescatori LC, Pescatori
M. Management of obstructed defecation. World J
Gastroenterol. 2015;21(4):1053–60.
153. Mathers SE, Kempster PA, Swash M, Lees
AJ.Constipation and paradoxical puborectalis contraction in anismus and Parkinson’s disease: a dystonic phenomenon? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry.
1988;51(12):1503–7.
154. Kuijpers HC, Bleijenberg G. The spastic pelvic
oor syndrome. A cause of constipation. Dis Colon
Rectum. 1985;28(9):669–72.
155. Kuijpers HC, Bleijenberg G, de Morree H. The
spastic pelvic oor syndrome. Large bowel outlet
obstruction caused by pelvic oor dysfunction: a
radiological study. Int J Color Dis. 1986;1(1):44–8.
156. MacDonald A, Shearer M, Paterson PJ, Finlay
IG. Relationship between outlet obstruction constipation and obstructed urinary ow. Br J Surg.
1991;78(6):693–5.
157. Heymen S, Wexner SD, Gulledge AD.MMPI assessment of patients with functional bowel disorders.
Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;36(6):593–6.
158. Sullivan ES, Leaverton GH, Hardwick
CE. Transrectal perineal repair: an adjunct to
improved function after anorectal surgery. Dis Colon
Rectum. 1968;11(2):106–14.
159. Khubchandani IT, Sheets JA, Stasik JJ, Hakki
AR. Endorectal repair of rectocele. Dis Colon
Rectum. 1983;26(12):792–6.
160. Sehapayak S. Transrectal repair of rectocele:
an extended armamentarium of colorectal surgeons. A report of 355 cases. Dis Colon Rectum.
1985;28(6):422–33.
161. Picirillo MTT, Yoon K, Patino Paul R, Lucas J,
Wexner S. Rectoceles: the incidence and clinical
signicance. Tech Coloproctol. 1996;2:75–9.
162. Block IR. Transrectal repair of rectocele
using obliterative suture. Dis Colon Rectum.
1986;29(11):707–11.
163. Karasick S, Karasick D, Karasick SR.Functional disorders of the anus and rectum: ndings on defecography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993;160(4):777–82.
164. Siproudhis L, Ropert A, Lucas J, Raoul JL,
Heresbach D, Bretagne JF, et al. Defecatory disorders, anorectal and pelvic oor dysfunction: a
polygamy? Radiologic and manometric studies in 41
patients. Int J Color Dis. 1992;7(2):102–7.
165. Karlbom U, Graf W, Nilsson S, Pahlman L. Does
surgical repair of a rectocele improve rectal emptying? Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;39(11):1296–302.
166. Hawksworth W, Roux JP.Vaginal hysterectomy. J
Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp. 1958;65(2):214–28.
167. Jorge JM, Yang YK, Wexner SD. Incidence and
clinical signicance of sigmoidoceles as determined
by a new classication system. Dis Colon Rectum.
1994;37(11):1112–7.
168. Jorge JM, Wexner SD, Ehrenpreis ED, Nogueras
JJ, Jagelman DG. Does perineal descent correlate
with pudendal neuropathy? Dis Colon Rectum.
1993;36(5):475–83.
169. Barisic GI, Krivokapic ZV, Markovic VA, Popovic
MA.Outcome of overlapping anal sphincter repair
after 3 months and after a mean of 80 months. Int J
Color Dis. 2006;21(1):52–6.
170. Gilliland R, Altomare DF, Moreira H Jr, Oliveira
L, Gilliland JE, Wexner SD. Pudendal neuropathy is predictive of failure following anterior
overlapping sphincteroplasty. Dis Colon Rectum.
1998;41(12):1516–22.
171. Londono-Schimmer EE, Garcia-Duperly R,
Nicholls RJ, Ritchie JK, Hawley PR, Thomson

62
I. M. Paquette and J. I. S. Bleier
JP. Overlapping anal sphincter repair for faecal incontinence due to sphincter trauma: ve
year follow-up functional results. Int J Color Dis.
1994;9(2):110–3.
172. Bravo Gutierrez A, Madoff RD, Lowry AC, Parker
SC, Buie WD, Baxter NN. Long-term results of
anterior sphincteroplasty. Dis Colon Rectum.
2004;47(5):727–31. discussion 31–2
173. Karoui S, Leroi AM, Koning E, Menard JF, Michot
F, Denis P. Results of sphincteroplasty in 86
patients with anal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum.
2000;43(6):813–20.
174. Malouf AJ, Norton CS, Engel AF, Nicholls RJ,
Kamm MA. Long-term results of overlapping
anterior anal-sphincter repair for obstetric trauma.
Lancet. 2000;355(9200):260–5.
175. Ratto C, Litta F, Parello A, Donisi L, De Simone V,
Zaccone G.Sacral nerve stimulation in faecal incontinence associated with an anal sphincter lesion: a
systematic review. Color Dis. 2012;14(6):e297–304.
176. Johnson BL 3rd, Abodeely A, Ferguson MA, Davis
BR, Rafferty JF, Paquette IM.Is sacral neuromodulation here to stay? Clinical outcomes of a new treatment for fecal incontinence. J Gastrointest Surg.
2015;19(1):15–9. discussion 9–20.
177. Hull T, Giese C, Wexner SD, Mellgren A,
Devroede G, Madoff RD, etal. Long-term durability of sacral nerve stimulation therapy for
chronic fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum.
2013;56(2):234–45.
178. Quezada Y, Whiteside JL, Rice T, Karram M, Rafferty
JF, Paquette IM.Does preoperative anal physiology
testing or ultrasonography predict clinical outcome
with sacral neuromodulation for fecal incontinence?
Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(11):1613–7.
179. Brouwer R, Duthie G.Sacral nerve neuromodulation
is effective treatment for fecal incontinence in the
presence of a sphincter defect, pudendal neuropathy, or previous sphincter repair. Dis Colon Rectum.
2010;53(3):273–8.

Congenital andPediatric Anorectal
Conditions
AnneKimMackow
4
Abbreviations
HAEC Hirschsprung’s associated
enterocolitis
LAARP Laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty
PSARP Posterior sagittal anorectoplasty
RAIR Recto-anal inhibitory reex
SRUS Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome
VACTERL Vertebral, anorectal, cardiac, tracheo-
esophageal, renal, limb anomalies
Introduction
An understanding of the common pediatric anorectal problems is important for the practicing surgeon. Although some adult conditions such as anal
ssure and prolapse occur in children, the presentation and management may be quite different.
Patients with the more unusual problems such as
Hirschsprung’s disease and imperforate anus may
have difculties well into adulthood. Indeed, some
patients with Hirschsprung’s disease may not present until adulthood. Awareness of these problems
assists in appropriate management.
A. K. Mackow ()
Division of Pediatric Surgery, Rainbow Babies and
Children’s Hospital, University Hospitals,
Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
e-mail: Anne.kim@uhhospitals.org
Anorectal Malformations
Following an extensive report of the embryology
and anatomy of patients with anorectal malformations by Ladd and Gross in 1934 [1], there was
an effort made in 1970 to classify anorectal malformations as low, intermediate, or high based on
the position of the distal end of bowel with
respect to the puborectalis or levator sling [2].
Their initial work has been further elucidated
over time, with these malformations being most
easily understood by the presence of a stula and
its connection to the genitourinary tract or
perineum. The location of the stulous connection has important implications on the presence
of associated congenital anomalies and longterm outcomes in terms of continence and constipation [3, 4]. The overall incidence of
anorectal malformations has been reported as
1in 5000 live births [5].
Classication
Anorectal malformations encompass a wide
spectrum of anomalies, including rectal atresia
or stenosis, imperforate anus without a stula
and perineal stulas (Table4.1), which occur in
both males and females. In rectal atresia (~1% of
malformations), the anus appears normal externally, but there may be a narrowing or atresia
noted on attempt to pass a probe for rectal tem-
© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019
D. E. Beck et al. (eds.), Fundamentals of Anorectal Surgery,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65966-4_4
63

64
Table 4.1 Classications of anorectal malformations
Male Female
Perineal stula
Rectourethral stula Rectovestibular stula
Rectobulbar
Rectoprostatic
stula
Imperforate anus without stula
Rectal atresia
Complex defects
Modied from [6]
Cloaca
Common channel <3cm
Common channel >3cmRectobladder neck
A. K. Mackow
perature measurement [3]. Patients with imperforate anus without a stula (~5% of
malformations), have a blind end of rectum,
which is generally located within 2 cm of the
perineum. There appears to be an association
between this particular malformation (5–10% of
anorectal malformations overall) and trisomy
21—although 2% of patients with anorectal malformations have trisomy 21, 95% of them have
an imperforate anus without a stula [7, 8].
Finally, perineal stulas are usually thought to
be an anteriorly-displaced anus. On examination, there is a small perineal opening that is stenotic and appears to be anterior to the center of
the sphincter. Because these openings are
obstructively small and are not centered within
the sphincteric complex, these are best thought
of as a stula to the perineum rather than a true
displacement of the anus itself.
In males (Fig. 4.1), anorectal malformations
may involve stulas between the rectum and the
urethra at the level of the bulbar or prostatic portions of the urethra, or the bladder neck. The most
common male defect is the rectourethral bulbar
stula, a connection of the rectum to the lower
portion of the urethra; this occurs in up to 50% of
male cases [3]. Fortunately, these also tend to
have good prognoses with respect to continence
and sphincteric function. In contrast, those stulas that open into the prostatic, or upper portion
of the urethra, tend to have more problems with
sacral anomalies and poor sphincter control.
About 10% of males with anorectal malformations have bladder neck stulas and these tend to
follow suit with the rectoprostatic stulas. In
general, management of these patients is surgi-
Fig. 4.1 Male anorectal malformation—the perineal
raphe is prominent and the gluteal cleft less pronounced
than usual. The lack of an anus in this child should prompt
examination for meconium along the raphe during the rst
24h of life
cally staged, utilizing an initial colostomy and
later denitive repair of the stula.
Females generally have two types of stulas—either a rectovestibular stula (Fig. 4.2a)
with an abnormal connection of the rectum to the
posterior aspect of the vaginal introitus or a cloacal anomaly (Fig.4.2b). Although the term rectovaginal is used freely with respect to these
stulas, the actual incidence of these anomalies
is only 1% [9]. This is an important distinction
because when the anomaly is not clearly rectovestibular, there may be an assumption that the
anomaly is rectovaginal in nature, when it is
actually a cloaca—a common, often small, orice that empties the urinary, vaginal and intestinal tracts. The conjoined openings of the urinary,
genital and colorectal systems may cause
obstruction of any of these outlets such that urinary or vaginal ostomies need to be created,
potentially with a concomitant colostomy and
mucous stula for initial diversion. Eventual
detailing of the anatomy requires a combination
of contrast studies to evaluate the shape and connection of the genitourinary tracts and distal
colostomy, as well as cystoscopy and exam
under anesthesia to evaluate the length of the
common channel. The incorrect initial assumption that a cloaca is a rectovaginal stula will
lead to the need to address the urogenital sinus at
a later point.

4 Congenital andPediatric Anorectal Conditions
65
a
b
Fig. 4.2 Female anorectal malformations. (a)
Rectovestibular stula in an older child, with the rectal
opening visualized within the posterior aspect of the
introitus. (b) Cloaca with diminutive external orice
Rectovestibular stulas, because they offer
ready egress for stool, allow for a broader range
of management, as neonates may be able to stool
through a stula if it is large enough. If the patient
is relatively small or systemically ill, and their
stula can be dilated, they may be able to have
denitive surgical treatment delayed.
Embryology
During the third week of gestation, a common
cavity connects the allantois (which may give rise
to the bladder), the mesonephric ducts (eventually giving rise to the ureter and gonads) and the
hindgut, which are bound by the cloacal membrane. Although the exact process of septation
between the anorectal and genitourinary tracts is
still under investigation [10], the prevailing
thought has supported the presence of a urorectal
septum that arises craniocaudally and migrates
toward the cloacal membrane, as well as the
ingrowth of lateral (Rathke) folds before the cloacal membrane ruptures during the seventh week
[6]. The muscles of the levator and sphincteric
complex form between weeks 6–9, but the
sphincteric complex is matured by the end of the
third month of gestation [10, 11]. The development of the external genitalia is ongoing after this
point and not included in this discussion.
Associated Anomalies
Anorectal malformations are part of the range of
anomalies associated with the VACTERL
sequence (vertebral, anorectal, cardiac, tracheoesophageal, renal, limb anomalies). The evaluation for these involves sacral x-rays to evaluate
for sacral and spinal defects such as spina bida,
and an eventual sacral ultrasound or MRI (if
older than 3months of age) to rule out the presence of a tethered cord, which can be found in
24% of these patients (11% of those with rectovestibular stula and 29% of those with cloaca), depending on the severity of their defect
[12]. Smaller ratios of the coccygeal-sacroiliac
distance to the sacroiliac-iliac crest distance are
predictive of the severity of the malformation and
presence of tethered cord [3, 12]. Sacral ultrasound has been reported to be 80% sensitive and
89% specic for the presence of tethered cord,
and can be conrmed with MRI [13]. Cardiac
defects should be evaluated with an echocardiogram. Tracheoesophageal stula is generally
clinically apparent at birth if esophageal atresia is
present, but may be challenging to identify until
later in life if it involves an H-type defect with an
intact esophagus. Renal or genitourinary malformations are comprised primarily of renal agenesis and vesicoureteral reux that do not generally
necessitate immediate intervention at birth. Limb
anomalies can be evaluated and treated on an
elective basis by a pediatric orthopedist.
Of these anomalies, genitourinary (in almost
50%) and sacral (in almost 30%) defects are far
more likely in patients with higher stulas with
respect to the perineum [4]. As seen in Table4.2,

66
Table 4.2 Fistula level as related to associated anomalies and functional outcomes
%GU anomaly if
Fistula level
Rectal
atresia
Perineal 0 00 100 100 0 29 0
Vestibular 30 80 93 66 30 61 5
Bulbar 25 55 81 34 65 55 0
No stula – – 77 52 39 50 0
Vaginal 72 83 75 0 100 25 0
Cloaca 88 82 71 37 68 28 19–64
Prostatic 66 79 67 26 74 41 7
Bladder
neck
Data from [3, 4]
N.B.Data taken as percentages from below references to show trends of outcomes and presence of anomalies based on
stula level.
a
As determined by common channel length shorter or longer than 3cm
% GU
anomaly
– – 100 100 0 40 0
92 93 16 0 83 18 10
also has spinal
anomaly
% voluntary BM% total fecal
continence
%
soiling% constipation
A. K. Mackow
% urinary
incontinence
a
patients with sacral defects are even more likely
to have genitourinary defects. In addition, functional outcomes for these patients tend to be
poorer if the stula is higher, with rates of voluntary bowel movement control and fecal continence being far better and rates of soiling far less
in patients with lower stulas. In contrast, the
rates of constipation tend to be higher in patients
with relatively lower stulas. Urinary incontinence was primarily seen in patients with higher
stulas, such as to the bladder neck, and in cloacal anomalies with a longer common channel
(dened as greater than 3cm) [3].
An interesting association between anorectal
anomalies, sacral defects and presacral mass was
rst described by Currarino in 1981 [14].
Presacral masses may represent teratoma, meningocele or enteric cysts. Interestingly, when associated with Currarino syndrome, these masses are
less likely to undergo malignant transformation
than are sacrococcygeal teratomas presenting in
isolation [15].
Presentation
Patients with these anomalies generally present
early in the neonatal period, and depending on
the level of their stula, may have abdominal distention related to obstruction. After the recogni-
tion of a lack of an anus, further evaluation differs
depending on what is noted on perineal exam. As
stated previously, if a patient has features that
correspond to trisomy 21 or a known diagnosis,
and have an imperforate anus, they are more
likely to have no stula. Male infants with a perineal stula may have green, white or dark meconium noted along the midline raphe of the penis
or scrotum, or what is termed a “bucket handle
deformity” overlying the anus (Fig.4.1). If meco-
nium can be expressed from the urethral meatus,
that is a clear indication of some stulous connection of the rectum to some portion of the urinary tract.
As for female infants, the lack of an anal opening should prompt evaluation of the introitus. This
is best effected by placing outward manual traction on the labia. If there is a rectovestibular stula, it will be noted in the posterior aspect of the
vestibule (Fig.4.2). If there is a true rectovaginal
stula, it may be noted above the level of the
hymenal opening. However, the likelihood of
identifying this in a neonate, given its size, is very
low. As for cloacal anomalies, these may present
in a number of ways. Beyond the abdominal distention that would be caused by the inability to
effectively pass stool, the neonate may present
with a lower abdominal mass that is comprised of
either a distended bladder or vagina (hydrocolpos). The urinary tract obstruction is generally a

4 Congenital andPediatric Anorectal Conditions
67
result of a back-lling of the vagina from the urinary tract, which can accumulate so much uid
that it obstructs the urethra. It is of critical importance to ensure adequate decompression of the
urinary system, either via intermittent catheterization of the cloacal opening or by urgent surgical
intervention, often with the use of a suprapubic or
vaginostomy tube. Initial intraoperative assessment of these patients involves careful endoscopic
evaluation to evaluate the anatomy of the various
tracts and to measure the length of the common
channel as this predicts the need for abdominal
approach and the anticipated complexity of such a
repair. Vaginal and uterine duplication may be
present to varying extents, sometimes with a vaginal septum in a single vaginal opening [9, 13].
Management
Immediate management of the patient, once it
has been established that they have adequate urinary drainage and resuscitation, should involve
workup for potentially life-threatening associated anomalies, obtaining echocardiography and
passing a nasogastric tube to establish esophageal continuity. If the patient is stable, sacral
anomalies can be assessed with a sacral x-ray,
and ultrasound of the sacrum and abdomen can
be obtained to assess for tethered cord or renal
anomalies. In addition, abdominal ultrasound can
help demonstrate hydrocolpos or bladder distention if not clinically evident.
If no obvious stula is noted, an “invertogram”
can be taken after 16–24 h, keeping the patient
with the perineum elevated to evaluate the bowel
gas pattern to determine the level of the distalmost
rectum and measure its distance to the perineum
(Fig.4.3a). If performed too early, it is possible
that not enough air will have accumulated in the
GI tract to allow for satisfactory delineation of the
rectum [1, 6]. Additionally, it may take 20–24h
for meconium to have been forced into the stula
to become obvious in the urine or along the
perineum [6].
By 24h of age, the surgeon should have accumulated enough information to determine if they
should proceed with a colostomy and staged proce-
a
b
Fig. 4.3 Diagnostic imaging for operative planning for
repair of anorectal malformations: (a) Cross-table lateral
radiograph, high rectum. (b) Distal colostogram showing
a rectourethral bulbar stula. Reprinted with permission
from [6] © 2012 Elsevier
dure, or whether primary repair is reasonable [6,
16]. The decision about staging depends on the
ability to initially identify the level of the stula. If
the distal pouch is sufciently low or if the stula is
perineal or rectovestibular in nature, it is reasonable to perform a primary repair with anoplasty or
limited sagittal anorectoplasty. If the stula is
higher or the rectal pouch is above the coccyx on
the invertogram, a divided colostomy should be
created in the left lower quadrant of the abdomen.

68
A. K. Mackow
Divided Colostomy
Peña describes creating a divided colostomy
using an oblique left lower quadrant incision with
maturation of a descending colostomy at one end
of the incision, and a smaller, skin level mucous
stula at the other end of the incision [17]. These
recommendations came from their experience
with ostomy complications in patients cared for
at other institutions, with notable complications
including mislocation of the stoma and stomal
prolapse. Problems related to location of the
stoma involved stomas that were too close
together, allowing for fecal contamination of the
distal limb, and with fecal impaction in that distal
limb causing problems during the eventual anoplasty. Another problem relates to bringing up the
proximal ostomy such that there is too short an
intervening segment to allow for a tension-free
anoplasty at the time of denitive repair. This is
obviated by maintaining the retroperitoneal
attachments of the descending colon where the
stoma is created, which also helps to prevent mistaking the proximal for the distal colon. In addition, the relative xation of the colon at this point
would help prevent prolapse of the colostomy by
maturing a non-mobile segment of bowel.
Preventing stoma prolapse for the mucous stula
is aided by tacking part of the mobile bowel to
the anterior abdominal wall approximately
6–7 cm from the stoma and creating a small,
skin-level stoma [17].
The goal of temporary diversion is to allow
the passage of stool and provide for eventual anorectoplasty with the protective nature of this
colostomy. The anorectoplasty will be less complicated if there is no need to take down the
colostomy, as well as by assuring that the distal
colon is adequately clean of stool before creation
of the mucous stula. If the distal colon becomes
impacted with stool, the anorectoplasty will be
made difcult by the dilation of this portion of
the colon. In addition, part of the importance of
creating a good distal colostomy would be the
eventual performance of a high-pressure distal
colostogram (Fig. 4.3b), in which a balloonbased urinary catheter could be introduced into
the distal colostomy, held on some tension so that
the balloon occluded the external tract, and then
contrast applied under pressure to help delineate
the distal rectum and stula to whichever portion
of the urinary tract that it involved [18]. This is
often done 6–8weeks after the initial colostomy
creation.
Posterior Sagittal Anorectoplasty
Denitive repair of these malformations is
affected by posterior sagittal anorectoplasty
(PSARP) as described by Peña in 1982 [19].
Prior to this time, different techniques had been
tried, ranging from cruciate perforation of a thin
distal membrane to joint abdominoperineal
approaches to attempting to pull the rectum
through the puborectalis sling, with varying success [1, 20, 21]. Interestingly, Ladd and Gross
described a midline dissection undertaken with
the patient in lithotomy position, resulting in a
similar exposure and placement of the rectum
within the center of the sphincter complex in a
similar manner to that of the PSARP, but with
more discouraging results at the time of their
report [1]. In the PSARP technique, the patient is
positioned prone and an electrical stimulator is
used to identify the sphincter muscle components
before the structures are divided in the midline
from the coccyx to the perineum. The midline
dissection allows for a relatively bloodless eld
and the identication of the fascia surrounding
the rectum once the anal sphincteric and levator
muscular complexes have been divided. It is of
critical importance to avoid rectal ischemia by
maintaining the dissection on the surface of the
rectum but not damaging the rich intramural
blood supply.
In males, the rectum should be opened to identify the stula within the tract (Fig.4.4); ne silk
sutures are placed to provide uniform traction on
the rectal wall as it is opened. Once the stula is
identied, a submucosal dissection should be
undertaken to separate the urethral wall from the
stula. The stula is then divided close to the urethra and the site marked for eventual closure with
absorbable suture. The rectum is then circumferentially dissected, with the anterior dissection
undertaken once the majority of the posterolateral dissection has been completed, as the plane
between the rectum and seminal vesicles is very

fg hij
de
4 Congenital andPediatric Anorectal Conditions
69
a
Fig. 4.4 Essential steps for posterior sagittal anorectoplasty in male patients—(a) Planned posterior sagittal
incision. (b) Posterior sagittal approach with the parasagittal bers and ischiorectal fat split in the midline. (c)
Posterior rectal wall exposed. (d) Posterior rectal wall
opened in the midline. (e) Posterior rectal wall opened
going anteriorly until the rectourethral stula is identied.
(f) Separation of the rectum from the posterior urethra
with dissection above the stula. (g) The rectum fully
bc
thin-walled. Once the rectum has been separated
from the urinary tract and fully mobilized, the stula is closed with absorbable suture and the perineal body closed in layers. The rectum is then
situated within the sphincter complex. The levator ani is then closed posterior to the rectum, taking care to incorporate some sutures to the rectal
wall to help prevent prolapse. The skin is then
closed in midline and the anoplasty completed
with circumferential, interrupted long-term
absorbable suture [6, 19].
If the stula is perineal, uniform traction can
be initiated and maintained by using ne silk
sutures through the edges of the stula as it is dissected away from the surrounding tissue, but the
remainder of the procedure is the same, with the
exception of having to close a urinary stula. For
mobilized and in this case tapered. Sutures are placed
anteriorly to close the perineal body. (h) The rectum
pulled though and placed within the limits of the sphincter
mechanism. (i) Closure of the levator and tacking of the
posterior edge of the muscle complex to the posterior rectal wall. (j) Closure of the posterior sagittal incision and
completed anoplasty. Reprinted with permission from [6]
© 2012 Elsevier
higher rectal pouches, as to the bladder neck,
length is obtained by an abdominal approach
with ligation of the arterial branches close to the
wall of the rectum so that the distal rectum continues to rely on its intramural blood supply as
supplied by the main trunk of the inferior mesenteric artery [6, 19].
In females with rectovestibular stulas, the
rectal wall is identied within the base of the
midline wound and dissection proceeds with use
of ne silk sutures to mark the edges of the stula
and separate it from the introitus. As mentioned
above, the anterior dissection requires careful
attention to separate the rectum from the very
thin vaginal wall.
Cloacal anomalies, because of the involvement of the entire urogenital tract, are even more
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
