Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_898_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
33 Мб
Скачать
24

References

1. Reynolds Jr W. The fi rst laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JSLS. 2001;5(1):89–94. PubMed PMID: 11304004. Pubmed Central PMCID: 3015420.
2. Shukla PJ, Barreto G, Gupta P, Shrikhande SV. Laparoscopic sur­gery for colorectal cancers: current status. J Minim Access Surg. 2006;2(4):205–10. PubMed PMID: 21234147. Pubmed Central PMCID: 3016481.
3. Jayne DG, Thorpe HC, Copeland J, Quirke P, Brown JM, Guillou PJ. Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2010;97(11):1638–45. PubMed PMID: 20629110.
4. Hatzinger M, Kwon ST, Langbein S, Kamp S, Hacker A, Alken P. Hans Christian Jacobaeus: inventor of human laparoscopy and thoracoscopy. J Endourol. 2006;20(11):848–50. PubMed PMID:
17144849.
5. Vilos GA, Ternamian A, Dempster J, Laberge PY. The Society of O, Gynaecologists of C. Laparoscopic entry: a review of techniques, technologies, and complications. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2007;29(5):433–65.
6. Passerotti CC, Begg N, Penna FJ, Passerotti AM, Leite KR, Antunes AA, et al. Safety profi le of trocar and insuffl ation needle access sys­tems in laparoscopic surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;209(2):222–32. PubMed PMID: 19632599.
7. Theodoropoulou K, Lethaby DR, Bradpiece HA, Lo TL, Parihar A. Direct trocar insertion technique: an alternative for creation of pneumoperitoneum. JSLS. 2008;12(2):156–8. PubMed PMID:
18435888. Pubmed Central PMCID: 3016192.
8. Docherty JG, McGregor JR, Akyol AM, Murray GD, Galloway DJ. Comparison of manually constructed and stapled anastomoses in colorectal surgery. West of Scotland and Highland Anastomosis Study Group. Ann Surg. 1995;221(2):176–84. PubMed PMID:
7857145. Pubmed Central PMCID: 1234951.
9. Slieker JC, Daams F, Mulder IM, Jeekel J, Lange JF. Systematic review of the technique of colorectal anastomosis. JAMA Surg. 2013;148(2):190–201. PubMed PMID: 23426599.
10. Chan D, Bishoff JT, Ratner L, Kavoussi LR, Jarrett TW. Endovascular gastrointestinal stapler device malfunction dur­ing laparoscopic nephrectomy: early recognition and management. J Urol. 2000;164(2):319–21. PubMed PMID: 10893574.
11. Deng DY, Meng MV, Nguyen HT, Bellman GC, Stoller ML. Laparoscopic linear cutting stapler failure. Urology. 2002;60(3):415–9. discussion 9-20. PubMed PMID: 12350475.
12. Mery CM, Shafi BM, Binyamin G, Morton JM, Gertner M. Profi ling surgical staplers: effect of staple height, buttress, and overlap on staple line failure. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008;4(3):416–22. PubMed PMID: 18226977.
13. Ho YH, Ashour MA. Techniques for colorectal anastomosis. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16(13):1610–21. PubMed PMID: 20355239. Pubmed Central PMCID: 2848369.
14. Brescia A, Mari FS, Favi F, Milillo A, Nigri G, Dall’oglio A, et al. Laparoscopic lower anterior rectal resection using a curved stapler: original technique and preliminary experience. Am Surg. 2013;79(3):253–6. PubMed PMID: 23461949.
M.D. Jafari et al.
15. Phillips CK, Hruby GW, Durak E, Lehman DS, Humphrey PA, Mansukhani MM, et al. Tissue response to surgical energy devices. Urology. 2008;71(4):744–8. PubMed PMID: 18289646.
16. Knight DJ, Mahajan R. Patient positioning in anaesthesia. Continuing Education Anaesthesia. Critical Care & Pain. 2004;4(5): 160–3.
17. Jiang X, Anderson C, Schnatz PF. The safety of direct trocar versus Veress needle for laparoscopic entry: a meta-analysis of random­ized clinical trials. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech Part A. 2012; 22(4):362–70. PubMed PMID: 22423957.
18. Hashizume M, Sugimachi K. Needle and trocar injury during lapa­roscopic surgery in Japan. Surg Endosc. 1997;11(12):1198–201. PubMed PMID: 9373293.
19. Jansen FW, Kolkman W, Bakkum EA, de Kroon CD, Trimbos­Kemper TC, Trimbos JB. Complications of laparoscopy: an inquiry about closed- versus open-entry technique. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190(3):634–8. PubMed PMID: 15041992.
20. Palmer R. Safety in laparoscopy. J Reproduct Med. 1974;13(1):1–
5. PubMed PMID: 4276707.
21. Teoh B, Sen R, Abbott J. An evaluation of four tests used to ascertain Veress needle placement at closed laparoscopy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2005;12(2):153–8. PubMed PMID:
15904620.
22. Dingfelder JR. Direct laparoscope trocar insertion without prior pneumoperitoneum. J Reproduct Med. 1978;21(1):45–7. PubMed PMID: 151144.
23. Hasson HM. A modifi ed instrument and method for laparoscopy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1971;110(6):886–7. PubMed PMID:
4254516.
24. Lal P, Vindal A, Sharma R, Chander J, Ramteke VK. Safety of open technique for fi rst-trocar placement in laparoscopic surgery: a series of 6,000 cases. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(1):182–8. PubMed PMID: 21853393.
25. Merlin TL, Hiller JE, Maddern GJ, Jamieson GG, Brown AR, Kolbe A. Systematic review of the safety and effectiveness of meth­ods used to establish pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg. 2003;90(6):668–79. PubMed PMID: 12808613.
26. Litwin DE, Darzi A, Jakimowicz J, Kelly JJ, Arvidsson D, Hansen P, et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) with the HandPort system: initial experience with 68 patients. Ann Surg. 2000;231(5):715–23. PubMed PMID: 10767793. Pubmed Central PMCID: 1421059.
27. HALS Study Group. Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery vs stan­dard laparoscopic surgery for colorectal disease: a prospective ran­domized trial. Surg Endosc. 2000;14(10):896–901. PubMed PMID:
11080399.
28. DeSouza A, Domajnko B, Park J, Marecik S, Prasad L, Abcarian H. Incisional hernia, midline versus low transverse incision: what is the ideal incision for specimen extraction and hand-assisted lapa­roscopy? Surg Endosc. 2011;25(4):1031–6. PubMed PMID:
20737171.
29. den Boer KT, Herder JL, Sjoerdsma W, Meijer DW, Gouma DJ, Stassen HG. Sensitivity of laparoscopic dissectors. What can you feel? Surg Endosc. 1999;13(9):869–73.
30. Smith R, Pasic R. The role of vessel sealing technologies in laparo­scopic surgery. Surg Technol Int. 2008;17:208–12. PubMed PMID:
18802904.

Surgical Anatomy

Todd D. Francone and Ron G. Landmann
3
K e y P o i n t s
• A thorough understanding of the anatomy is imperative for proper exposure during minimally invasive operations. Every effort must be made to gain a clear understanding of the relationship and spacial arrangement of vital struc­tures prior to proceeding with dissection.
• Excellent exposure, meticulous technique, and proper assistance cannot be overstated and are essential compo­nents to providing appropriate care to the patient, improv­ing outcomes, and minimizing complications.
• Tension/counter-tension is an essential maneuver in devel­oping and maintaining correct exposure of planes during any minimally invasive colon and rectal procedure.
• Retroperitoneal structures are always at risk during lapa­roscopic colectomy and must be identifi ed and avoided throughout the dissection: right colectomy (duodenum), transverse colectomy (pancreas and mesenteric vessels), left colectomy (ureter/gonadal vessels, autonomic nerves), and pelvic dissection (ureter, hypogastric nerves).

Introduction

Laparoscopic and robotic dissection of the abdominal colon and rectum have become increasingly utilized both for benign and malignant disease processes. Based on the underlying disease, and sequela of such processes, practicing and
T. D. Francone , M.D., M.P.H. (*) Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Lahey Health and Medical Center , Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Tufts University Medical Center , 41 Mall Road , Burlington , MA 01805 , USA
Todd.d.francone@lahey.org
e-mail: R. G. Landmann , M.D., F.A.C.S., F.A.S.C.R.S.
Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine , Mayo Clinic , 4500 San Pablo Road , Jacksonville , FL 32224 , USA
landmann.ron@mayo.edu
e-mail:
becoming facile with the various approaches will make exposure safer, quicker, and more reproducible.
A fundamental understanding of the surgical anatomy allows the surgeon to have the ability to proceed in a safe manner, perform an appropriate oncological resection, and allow for additional diagnostic and therapeutic maneuvering while maximizing quality of life and simultaneously reduc­ing morbidity.
Anatomy of Colonic Mesenteric Vasculature
Ileocolic, Middle Colic, and Right Colic Arteries (Figs.
A clear understanding of colon mesenteric vascular anatomy is critical in performing laparoscopic colon resections. A thorough knowledge of vascular anatomy is especially impor­tant when performing resections for colon cancer where high ligation of mesenteric vessels is required.
Based on numerous anatomic, pathological, surgical, and radiologic studies, considerable variation exists in colonic vasculature (Fig. 3.3a–d ). These variations need to be con- sidered when approaching any dissection. One such example is that of the right colic artery (RCA) as a direct tributary of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) – this occurs in only 11 % of cases. Depending on the study, the RCA is a derived from branches of the ileocolic (ICA) and middle colic arter­ies (MCA) in up to 80-100 % of patients. Other variations include single (95 %) and double (4 %) MCA’s. When a double-MCA was found, the RCA was invariably absent. Rather than the typical SMA origin, the MCA itself can orig­inate from either hepatic or distal splenic arteries.
Pearl : When performing right colectomy, one can take
advantage of the constancy of the ileocolic vessels . The ileo­colic artery always courses toward the ileocecal junction (Fig. 3.1 and 3.2 ) . By identifying the terminal ileum and the cecal junction and gently retracting the mesentery near the
3.1 , 3.2 and 3.3 )
H.M. Ross et al. (eds.), Minimally Invasive Approaches to Colon and Rectal Disease: Technique and Best Practices, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-1581-1_3, © Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015
25
26
T.D. Francone and R.G. Landmann
Fig. 3.1 Demonstrates relationship of ileocolic pedicle, right colon, and transverse colon. Oftentimes, the duodenum can be seen in a relatively avascular plane toward the base of the mesentery and takeoff of the ileocolic pedicle
Fig. 3.2 Relationship of the ileocolic pedicle to the duodenum and right colon
ileocolic junction anteriorly and laterally, the ileocolic vessel will be tented or “bow stringed” for easy identifi ca­tion . The ileocolic artery is also the fi rst and usually the only branch of the SMA located just below the duodenal sweep . Prior to ligating the ileocolic pedicle, the duodenal sweep located just above and near the origin of the duode­nal sweep must be identifi ed in order to avoid inadvertently injuring the SMA Ileocolic pedicle (Fig. 33.4) .
Gastrocolic Trunk
An extreme caution should be exercised when dissecting the proximal transverse colon mesentery away from the duodenum and the head of the pancreas. Henle’s gastrocolic
Fig. 3.3 a–d Variations in the blood supply to the right colon. With permission from Yuko Tonohira
3 Surgical Anatomy
27
trunk, a communicating vein between the gastroepiploic vein and the right branch of the middle colic vein or the main middle colic vein, courses behind the proximal transverse colon mes-
Fig. 3.4 Superior mesenteric artery and its branches. With permission from Yuko Tonohira
entery. Aggressive dissection in this area can tear the gastro­colic trunk, causing diffi cult to control hemorrhage.

The Inferior Mesenteric Artery and Its Branches

The inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) is the last branch of the aorta prior to its bifurcation into the iliac vessels. The takeoff of the IMA occurs roughly at the level of L3 ver­tebrae, while the bifurcation resides roughly around L4 vertebrae of the anterior aorta and slightly to the left. The IMA and its branches are the vascular supply to the hind­gut structures including the distal transverse, descending, and sigmoid colon, as well as the rectum. The left colic artery is the fi rst branch off the IMA and is typically located 2 cm from the origin of the IMA from the aorta. The distal transverse colon and descending colon are vas­cularized via the ascending branch of the left colic artery. The bloody supply to the distal portion of the descending colon and proximal sigmoid colon is carried by the descending branch of the left colic artery . Distally, the IMA gives off various sigmoid branches. As the IMA courses over the left common iliac artery and vein, it gives rise to its terminal branch, the superior rectal artery (Figs. 3.5 and 3.6 ). As its name indicates, the superior rec- tal artery supplies the upper rectum in addition to the dis­tal sigmoid colon. As the vessel courses into the pelvic cavity, it splits into two branches, which descend the lat­eral aspects of the rectum within the mesorectum and endopelvic fascia [ 1 , 2 ].
Fig. 3.5 Blood supply to the left colon
28
T.D. Francone and R.G. Landmann
In benign disease, the left colic artery can often be pre-
served by dividing the superior rectal artery (IMA as it
crosses over the left common iliac artery), thereby main-
taining collateral fl ow to the distal descending colon and
proximal sigmoid colon . Typically, this is not a limiting
factor in achieving adequate mobilization of the colon
into the deep pelvis .
Splenic Flexure
The vascular anatomy distal to the middle colic artery and near the splenic fl exure is variable. Connections between the left and the middle colic arteries are common. Most commonly (33 %), the ascending and descending branches of the left colic artery communicate through the marginal vessels. An additional third branch off the left colic communication with the middle colic (25 %) or the left colic artery as single arcade attached to the marginal vessels (25 %) is less frequent. In minority of cases (14.5 %), an accessory left colic artery arises from the superior mesen­teric artery (Fig. 3.8 ).
Embryologic Surgical Planes
Fig. 3.6 Mobilization of the IMA. Arrows point to the direction of
mobilization toward the pedicle
Fig. 3.7 Mobilization of the IMA. Arrows point to the direction of mobilization toward the pedicle. With permission from Yuko Tonohira
Pearls :
There are no arterial branches coming off the IMA pos-
teriorly . Dissection behind the IMA gives avascular access to the retroperitoneum . Dissection in this plane is best initiated at the level of the sacral promontory where there is the greatest separation between the retroperito­neal structures and the IMA (Fig. 3.7 ) .
During embryologic development, the colon starts off as a midline structure. As the embryo develops, the colon rotates laterally and fuses with the retroperitoneum. The white line of Toldt represents the lateral fusion line between the colon and the retroperitoneum (Fig. 3.9a, b ). Regardless of type of dissection approach (medial to lat­eral vs. lateral to medial) one uses during a laparoscopic colectomy, the ultimate goal is to separate the colon and its mesentery away from the retroperitoneal structures and develop the colon as a midline structure. When performing the lateral-to-medial approach, the dissection must be started along or just medial to the white line of Toldt (Fig. 3.10a, b ). Dissection in this area will allow an entry into the appropriate plane between the colon mesentery and the retroperitoneum. On the other hand, dissecting lat­eral to the white line will likely lead directly into the retro­peritoneal space and will increase the likelihood of causing unwanted bleeding and injury to the retroperitoneal struc­tures. When performing medial-to-lateral dissection, the mesenteric vessels are isolated and ligated before gaining an access into the retroperitoneum (Fig. 3.10a, b ). Because there is no fusion plane between the colon mesentery and the retroperitoneum in the midline, closest to the named vessels, there is a tendency to veer off from the proper dis­section plane (Fig. 3.11a ). The surgeon has to make a con- scious effort to stay within the appropriate surgical plane (Fig. 3.11b ). The mantra “purple goes down” is useful to remind ourselves from getting too deep into the retroperi­toneal space.
3 Surgical Anatomy
Fig. 3.8 Variations in the blood supply to the left colon and splenic fl exure (1, 2, 3 = Variations in left colic artery branches). With permission from Yuko Tonohira
29
Fig. 3.9 ( a) Embryologic planes of the left colon ( C colon, U ureters, G gonadal vessels, IVC inferior vena cava, A aorta). (b) In the adult, the colon has fused ( green arrows ) to the retroperitoneum. With permission from Yuko Tonohira
Fig. 3.10 ( a ) Mobilization of the left colon through the white line of Toldt ( red arrow ); ( b ) continued dissection in the correct plane leaving the gonadal vessels and ureters in the retroperitoneum. With permission from Yuko Tonohira
30
Fig. 3.11 ( a ) Continuing mobili- zation in the posterior plane ( wrong plane ) will lead to eleva- tion and possible damage to the ureter. ( b ) The correct plane is above the gonadals and ureter, leaving them in the retroperito­neum. With permission from Yuko Tonohira
T.D. Francone and R.G. Landmann
Fig. 3.12 When mobilizing the terminal ileum mesentery, care must be taken to visualize the ureter which travels over the psoas and crosses the right external iliac artery
T h e U r e t e r
The ureters lie under the parietal peritoneum and rest on the anterior surface of the psoas muscle (Fig. 3.12 ). The right and left ureters both follow a straight path from the renal pelvis to the pelvic, 4–5 cm laterally to the IVC and the aorta, respectively (Fig. 3.13 ). The ureters then cross over the iliac vessels to enter the pelvic brim. The right ureter classically traverses the external iliac artery (Figs. 3.16 and
3.17 ), whereas the left ureter lies slightly more medial and typically crosses the common iliac artery. The ureters then run posterior and inferior on the lateral pelvic sidewall. In males, the ureters continue to course medially and pass between the vas deferens (anterior) and the seminal vesi­cles (posterior). In females, the ureter descends posterior to the ovary and into the base of the broad ligament passing under the uterine artery. In males and females, the ureter enters the posterolateral surface of the bladder and travels at an oblique angle for approximately 2 cm until it forms the trigone [ 3 ].
In the course of performing laparoscopic right colectomy, the right ureter is typically not encountered when dissecting the right colon mesentery away from the retroperitoneal structures. Rather, the right ureter is typically visualized when the terminal ileum mesentery is sharply dissected away from the retroperitoneum over the pelvic brim (Fig. 3.19 ).
When performing a laparoscopic left colectomy or pelvic dissection, the ureters may be encountered in two locations: (1) where they cross over the common iliac vessels and (2) the lateral walls of the pouch of Douglas as they course beneath either the vas deferens or the uterine artery (Fig. 3.20 ). When dissecting behind the IMA into the retro- peritoneal space, the left ureter is located medial to the gonadal vessels (Fig. 3.21 ). When developing the plane anteriorly, theoretically the ureters should not be seen at this level [ 4 , 5 ].
Pearls :
Prior to dividing the IMA pedicle, the ureter must be
visualized and dissected out of harm’s way .
If the left ureter is not visualized and the psoas muscle
appears bare, the plane of dissection is likely to be too
deep . The left ureter and gonadal vessels may be adherent
to the left colon mesentery in this case .
The Gonadal Vessels
The gonadal arteries typically arise from the anterior aorta just below the renal artery. Unlike the ureter, the gonadal vessels travel oblique toward the pelvic inlet. The gonadal arteries cross the abdominal ureters approximately halfway between the pelvic inlet and the renal pelvis. The ovarian vessels enter the broad ligament of the ovary at the pelvic brim. The testicular vessels cross the pelvic brim between the sacroiliac joint and the inguinal ligament to enter the deep inguinal ring. After traveling their respective courses, the right ovarian and testicular vein generally join the infe­rior cava while the left gonadal vein commonly joins the left renal vein [ 3 ].
3 Surgical Anatomy
Fig. 3.13 Course of the ureters on the psoas
31
Fig. 3.14 Entry into the presacral space. Notice the course of the ureter and the nerves at this level
Anatomy of the Pelvis
Low anterior (rectal) resection requires an intimate knowledge of the pelvic anatomy. Appropriate understanding of the com­partments and structures within these areas permits an easier, safer, more reproducible, and oncologically sound resection.
Posterior and Lateral Compartments
The posterior compartment of the pelvis is comprised of the presacral fascia, rectum with its associated mesorectum, and surrounding fascia propria (Fig.
3.20 ). The presacral fascia
overlies the concavity of the bony sacrum and coccyx
3.18 and 3.23 ). It contains the middle sacral artery, the
(Figs. autonomic nerves, and the presacral veins known for causing perilous bleeding during a pelvic dissection [ 6 , 7 ]. The rectum is enclosed by the fascia propria of the rectum, an investing extension of the endopelvic fascia. It encloses the mesorec­tum, fat, nerves, and the blood supply along the lateral extra­peritoneal stalks of the rectum. The rectogenital septum marks the anterior border of the posterior pelvic compart­ment. The septum is clearly marked by the visceral pelvic fascia or Denonvilliers fascia that separates the extraperito­neal rectum anteriorly from the vagina (Figs. 3.24 and 3.25 ) or prostate and seminal vesicles [ 8 ]. Developing the plane anterior to the fascia propria or extramesorectal plane may lead to resection of Denonvilliers fascia and is associated with an increased risk of bladder and sexual dysfunction due to sacrifi ce of branches of the pelvic plexus of the hypogastric nerves.
Pearls :
Development of Denonvilliers fascia can be diffi cult and
is often facilitated by developing the posterior and lat-
eral planes initially and extending them circumferen-
tially to the anterior plane .
If done correctly, the surgeon will notice an “open
C”-type or “opening-zipper” confi guration of this fascia
that will demarcate the appropriate dissection plane
(Figs. 3.26 and 3.27 ) . In this instance, starting from a
known to unknown dissection will help identify the
appropriate dissection plane with loose alveolar tissue
as the defi nitive marker .
32
Fig. 3.15 The right ureter will traverse the external iliac artery, while the left ureter will cross the travel slightly more medial crossing the left common iliac vessels
T.D. Francone and R.G. Landmann
Fig. 3.16 Entry into the presacral space. Notice the course of the ureter and the nerves at this level
Innervation
The colon and rectum are innervated by the sympathetic and parasympathetic systems. The sympathetic supply of the left colon and the rectum arises from L1 to L3 and is distributed through the lumbar splanchnic nerves via the aortic and inferior mesenteric plexuses and the sacral splanchnic
nerves through the superior and inferior hypogastric plex­uses (Fig. 3.28 ). The preganglionic fi bers synapse in the preaortic plexus, while postganglionic fi bers travel along the IMA and superior rectal artery to the intestine. These nerves typically overlie the aorta, and care must be taken to identify and preserve these during dissection and ligation of
3 Surgical Anatomy
Fig. 3.17 The right ureter will traverse the external iliac artery, while the left ureter will cross the travel slightly more medial crossing the left common iliac vessels
33
Fig. 3.18 Course of the ureter as it enters the pelvic sidewall and travels under the uterine artery (vas deferens) and into the bladde