Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_6022_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
36 Мб
Скачать
and no individuals with complete tetraplegia (12) will become community ambulators 1 year after injury. In the studies mentioned earlier, community ambulation was defined as the ability to walk more than 250 meters. Persons withparaplegia lacksufficienthip flexionbecause reciprocal gaitpatternmust utilize an energy-intensive swing-through, crutch-assisted method (11). This techniquerequiresarmandshouldergirdlestrengthsufficienttolifttheweight of the entire body and swing it forward—impractical for routine mobility becauseof the high rate ofenergyrequired, resultinginasubstantially slower walkingspeed(115).Thus,althoughanindividualmayutilizeaswing-through gait pattern to negotiate architectural barriers or to walk for exercise or psychologicalreasons, fewemploy thismannerof ambulationastheir primary modeofmobility.
Areciprocalgaitpatterncanbeutilizedwhenthereispelviccontrolwithat least3/5 strength inthehip flexors and inonequadriceps (116).This formof gait allows for knee stability without the use of a knee–ankle–foot orthosis (KAFO).Although a reciprocalgaitpattern requires less energythan a swing­throughpattern,therateofenergyexpenditureisstillhigherthanthatforable­bodied subjects. Those with incomplete injury are more likely to recover sufficient motor strength to permit reciprocal gait. Motor-complete, sensory­incompletelesionshavelesserprobabilityofrecoverythandomotor-incomplete lesions.Findingsofseveralstudies(37,40,41,43,46,47)examiningambulationas theprimaryoutcomemeasurearehighlightedinTable9.3.Althoughtheoverall ratesofcommunityambulationare76%forincompleteparaplegiaand46%for incomplete tetraplegia, results are greatly influenced by ASIA grade and the modalityofsensorysparing.
HusseyandStaufferdeterminedthatthereisadirectrelationshipbetweenLE strength and the ability to ambulate (116). They reported that “good pelvic control and active hip flexors and preferably one quadriceps muscle with functioninthefairorbetterrange”isrequiredforcommunityambulationwitha reciprocalgait pattern.Statedsimply,bilateralhip flexorsof at leasta 3/5and onekneeextensorofatleast3/5.Inanotherinvestigation,Crozierandcoworkers studied individuals with Frankel C (“motor useless”) injuries (117). They focusedontherecoveryofthequadricepsmuscleandreportedthatallpatients who had achieved quadriceps strength of at least 3/5 at 2 months following injuryprogressedto become functional ambulators, whereas only twoofeight patientswhohadnotattainedatleast3/5by2monthsachievedthisstatus.Itis believedthatstrengthgreaterthanorequalto3/5inthehipflexorsononeside
and greater than or equal to 3/5 quadriceps strength on the contralateral side allowssuccessfulcommunityambulation.Thisdegreeoffunctionwouldpermit useofone longlegbracewithafixedanklein dorsiflexionanda lockedknee and one short leg brace with a similarly dorsiflexed ankle. Proprioception, however,wouldalsoneedtobelargelyintact.
Waters and colleagues examined energy expenditure during walking with instrumented crutches that measured axial loading. Theyfound that the motor scoring system utilized by ASIA was a simple clinical measure that also correlatedstronglywithwalkingability(118).IndividualswithASIALEmotor scores(LEMS)of20orlesswereclassedaslimitedambulators.Thesepatients had slower average velocities, higher heart rates, subsequent greater energy expenditure, and greater axial loading exerted on assistive devices when compared to patients with LEMS of 30 or more who attained community ambulation status. Individuals with LEMS of 30 or more ambulated with physiologicparametersclosetothosedemonstratedbyable-bodiedsubjects.
Apart from residual strength, a patient’s balance, proprioception, and cognition are also important considerations in determining who will achieve communitymobilityasopposedtosimplysupervisedhouseholdambulation.
PredictionModelsBasedonLinearRegression A number of studies have looked at logistic regression analysis models for predictingneurological and functional outcomes(119–125).Wilsonet al. used both clinical and imaging data to predict functional outcome and found four factorsthatofferedprediction(119).Amongtheseareincludedbetterfunctional statuspredicted(1)bylesssevereinitialAISgradeanda(2)motorscoremore than50atadmission,and predictorsofworsefunctionaloutcome predictedby (3)olderageattimeofinjuryand(4)MRIsignalcharacteristicsconsistentwith spinal cord edema or hemorrhage. Kaminski et al. examined many different variables that could influence functional outcomes after traumatic SCI. The authorsfound thattheLTscore,followed bytheAIS classificationgrade,was the most powerful predictors. The next most influential factors included the Injury Severity Score (an anatomical scoring system that provides an overall score for patients with multiple injuries and hasbeen shownto correlate with disability) and the ASIA motor score (120). van Middendorp (121) (using clinical data) and Belliveau (122) (using clinical and demographic data) developed a model to predict ambulation at up to 1 year post-injury. van Middendorpreportedfivekeyprognosticvariablesforambulationthatincluded
age(cut-offat65years),motorscoresofthequadriceps(L3)andgastroc/soleus (S1)keymotorgroups,andlighttouchsensationatL3andS1dermatomes.This wasconfirmedbyothers(124).Inafurthervalidationofthesefactors,Hickset al. reported that further simplification of the prediction model would include threevariables (atadmission)including age(<65years), L3 motorscores, and LT scores at S1 at admission (123). For further details regarding predictive modelsofwhowillregaintheabilitytowalkafterSCI,pleaseseeChapter42.
CONCLUSION
The ability to predict outcome following spinal cord injury is extremely importantnotonlyforpersonswhosustainatraumaticinjuryandtheirfamilies, but also for the rehabilitation professionals charged with developing an appropriate plan of care and the researchers investigating the role of natural recovery in future therapeutic investigations. Factors involved in anticipating outcome have been reviewed in this chapter.In the past decades, the need to identify such early predictors has become increasingly critical, given the decreased length of both hospital andrehabilitationstays and the concomitant demandforprompt decision-making regarding discharge.Inaddition,research interventions,nowbeinginitiatedsoonafterinjury,underscorethesignificance of creating prediction models for the period immediately after injury. In the future,theemerging,interdisciplinaryfieldofgenomicswillmostlikelyplaya muchgreaterroleindeterminingprognosis.
REFERENCES
1. National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center. Facts and Figures at a Glance. Birmingham, AL:
UniversityofAlabamaatBirmingham;2016.
2. AmericanSpinalInjuryAssociation.InternationalStandardsforNeurologicalClassificationofSpinal
CordInjury.Atlanta,GA;2011,2015.
3. Waters RL, Adkins RH, Yakura JS. Definition of complete spinal cord injury. Paraplegia.
1991;29:573–581.doi:10.1038/sc.1991.85
4. Kirshblum SC, Botticello AL, Dyson-Hudson TA, et al. Patterns of sacral sparing components on
neurologic recovery in newly injured person with traumatic spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil.2016;97(10):1647–1655.doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2016.02.012
5. BurnsAS,LeeBS,DitunnoJFJr,etal.Patientselectionforclinicaltrials:thereliabilityoftheearly
spinalcordinjuryexamination.JNeurotrauma.2003;20:477–482.doi:10.1089/089771503765355540
6. Brown PJ, Marino RJ, Herbison GJ, et al. The 72-hour examination as a predictor of recovery in
motor complete quadriplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1991;72:546–548.
doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2010.07.242
7. Maynard FM, Reynolds GG, Fountain S, et al. Neurological prognosis after traumatic quadriplegia.
Three-yearexperienceofCaliforniaRegionalSpinalCordInjuryCareSystem.JNeurosurg.1979;50: 611–616.doi:10.3171/jns.1979.50.5.0611
8. HerbisonGJ,ZerbySA,CohenME,etal.Motorpowerdifferencewithinthefirsttwoweekspost-SCI
in cervical spinal cord quadriplegic subjects. J Neurotrauma. 1991;9:373–380. doi:10.1089/neu.1992.9.373
9. Mange KC, Ditunno JF, Herbison GJ, et al. Recovery of strength at the zone of injury in motor
complete and motor incomplete cervical spinal cord injured patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1990;71:562–565.
10. MarinoRJ,DitunnoJF,DonovanWH,etal.Neurologicrecoveryaftertraumaticspinalcord injury:
data from the model spinal cord injury systems. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80:1391–1396. doi:10.1016/S0003-9993(99)90249-6
11. Waters RL, Yakura JS, Adkins RH,etal. Recovery following completeparaplegia.ArchPhys Med
Rehabil.1992;73:784–789.
12. WatersRL,AdkinsRH,YakuraJS,etal.Motorandsensoryrecoveryfollowingcompletetetraplegia.
ArchPhysMedRehabil.1993;74:242–247.
13. Waters RL, Adkins RH, Yakura JS, et al. Motor and sensory recovery following incomplete
tetraplegia.ArchPhysMedRehabil.1994;75:306–311.doi:10.1016/0003-9993(94)90034-5
14. Waters RL, Adkins RH, Yakura JS, et al. Motor and sensory recovery following incomplete
paraplegia.ArchPhysMedRehabil.1994;75:67–72.doi:10.1016/0003-9993(94)90034-5
15. KrishnaV,AndrewsH,CarmaA,etal.Spinalcordinjury:howcanweimprovetheclassificationand
quantification of its severity and prognosis? J Neurotrauma. 2014;31:215–227. doi:10.1089/neu.2013.2982
16. ResnickDK.Updatedguidelinesforthemanagement ofacutecervicalspineandspinalcordinjury.
Neurosurgery.2013;72:1.doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e318276ee7e
17. Aarabi B, Walters BC, Dhall SS, et al. Subaxial cervical spine injury classification systems.
Neurosurgery.2013;72:170–186.doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e31828341c5
18. HelgesonMD,GendelbergD,SidhuGS,etal.Managementofcervicalspinetrauma:canaprognostic
classification of injury determine clinical outcomes? Orthop Clin North Am. 2012;43:89–96. doi:10.1016/j.ocl.2011.08.005
19. ChafetzRS,VogelLC,BetzRR,etal.Internationalstandardsforneurologicalclassificationofspinal
cord injury: training effect on accurate classification. J Spinal Cord Med. 2008;31:538–542. doi:10.1080/10790268.2008.11753649
20. ChhabraHS,KaulR,KanagarajuV.Dowehaveanidealclassificationsystemforthoracolumbarand
subaxial cervical spine injuries: what is the expert’s perspective? Spinal Cord. 2015;53(1):42–48. doi:10.1038/sc.2014.194
21. FawcettJW,Curt LA, Steeves JD, et al. Guidelinesfortheconductofclinicaltrialsforspinalcord
injury as develop by the ICCP panel: spontaneous recovery after spinal cord injury and statistical powerneededfortherapeuticclinicaltrials.SpinalCord.2007;45:190–205.doi:10.1038/sc.2014.194
22. American Spinal Injury Association/International Medical Society of Paraplegia (ASIA/IMSOP).
InternationalStandardsforNeurologicandFunctionalClassificationofSpinalCordInjury,Revised
2000.Chicago,IL:ASIA.
23. ZariffaJ,KramerJL,FawcettJW,etal.Characterizationofneurologicalrecoveryfollowingtraumatic
sensorimotor complete thoracic spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2011;49:463–471. doi:10.1038/sc.2010.140
24. LeeBA,LeibyBE,MarinoRJ.Neurologicalandfunctionalrecoveryafterthoracicspinalcordinjury.
JSpinalCordMed.2016;39(1):67–76.doi:10.1179/2045772314Y.0000000280
25. KirshblumS,MillisS,McKinleyW,etal.Lateneurologicrecoveryaftertraumaticspinalcordinjury.
ArchPhysMedRehabil.2004;85:1811–1825.doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2004.03.015
26. Ditunno JF,Cohen ME, Hauck WW,et al. Recovery of upper-extremity strength in complete and
incomplete tetraplegia: a multicenter study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81:389–393. doi:10.1053/mr.2000.3779
27. FischerCG,NoonanVK,SmithDE,etal.Motorrecovery,functionalstatus,andhealthrelatedquality
of life in patients with complete spinal cord injuries. Spine. 2005;30:2200–2207. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000181058.06412.a9
28. Steeves JD, Kramer JK, Fawcett JW, et al. Extent of spontaneous motor recovery after traumatic
cervical sensorimotor complete spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2011;49:257–265. doi:10.1038/sc.2010.99
29. Ditunno JFJ, Stover SL, Freed MM, et al. Motor recovery of the upper extremities in traumatic
quadriplegia:amulticenterstudy.ArchPhysMedRehabil.1992;73:431–436.
30. WilsonJR,DavisAM,KulkarniAV,etal.Definingage-relateddifferencesinoutcomeaftertraumatic
spinalcordinjury:analysisofacombined,multicenterdataset.SpineJournal.2014;14(7):1192–1198. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2013.08.005
31. Vaccaro AR, Daugherty RJ,SheehanTP,etal.Neurologicoutcomeof early versus late surgeryfor
cervicalspinalcordinjury.Spine.1976;22:2609–2613.doi:10.1097/00007632-199711150-00006
32. FehlingsMG,VaccaroA.WilsonJR,etal.Earlyversusdelayeddecompressionfortraumaticcervical
spinalcordinjury:resultsofthesurgicaltraininginacutespinalcordinjury study(STASCIS). Plos One.2012;7(2):e32037.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0032037
33. Yousefifard H, Rahimi-Moyaghar V. Baikpour M, et al. Early versus late spinal decompression
surgery in treatment of traumatic spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Emerg(Tehran).2017;5(1):e37.
34. Bracken MB.Steroids for acute spinal cord injury.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;CD001046.
doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001046
35. Hadley MN, WaltersBC. Introductiontotheguidelinesforthemanagementofacutecervicalspine
andspinalcordinjuries.Neurosurgery.2013;72(2):5–16.doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182773549
36. Fehlings MG, Wilson JR, Harrop JS, et al. Efficacy and safety of methylprednisolone sodium
succinate in acute spinal cord injury: a systematic review.Global Spine J. 2017;7(3S):116S–137S. doi:10.1177/2192568217706366
37. Foo D, Subrahmanyan TS, Rossier AB. Post-traumatic acute anterior spinal cord syndrome.
Paraplegia.1981;19:201–205.doi:10.1038/sc.1981.42
38. Marino RJ, Burns S, Graves DE, et al. Upper and lower extremity motor recovery after traumatic
cervicalspinalcordinjury:anupdatefromtheNationalSpinalCordInjuryDatabase.ArchPhysMed Rehabil.2011;92:369–375.doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2010.09.027
39. Spiess MR, Muller RM, Rupp R, etal.ConversioninASIAImpairmentScaleduringthefirstyear
aftertraumaticspinalcordinjury.JNeurotrauma.2009;26:2027–2036.doi:10.1089/neu.2008.0760
40. Crozier KS, Graziani V, Ditunno JF,et al. Spinal cord injury: prognosis for ambulation based on
sensory examination in patients who are initially motor complete. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1991;72:119–121.
41. OlesonCV,BurnsAS,DitunnoJF,etal.Prognosticvalueofpinprickpreservationinmotorcomplete,
sensory incomplete spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:988–992. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2004.09.031
42. ScivolettoG,FarchiS,LaurenzaL,etal.Impactofmultipleinjuriesonfunctionalandneurological
outcomesofpatientswithspinalcordinjury.Scand J TraumaResusc EmergMed.2013;21:42:1–7. doi:10.1186/1757-7241-21-42
43. OlesonCV,MarinoRJ,LeibyBE,etal.Influenceofagealone,andagecombinedwithpinprick,on
recoveryof walking functionin motor complete,sensory incomplete spinalcord injury.ArchPhys MedRehabil.2016;97:1635–1641.doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2016.01.024
44. StaufferES.Studyof100Paraplegics.RanchoLosAmigosPapers;1968.
45. PenrodLE,HedgeSK,DitunnoJF.Ageeffectonprognosisforfunctionalrecoveryinacute,traumatic
centralcordsyndrome.ArchPhysMedRehabil.1990;71:963–968.
46. Burns SP, Golding DG, Rolle WA, et al. Recovery of ambulation in motor-incomplete tetraplegia.
ArchPhysMedRehabil.1997;78:1169–1172.doi:10.1016/S0003-9993(97)90326-9
47. KayED,DeutschA,WuermserLA.Predictingwalkingatdischargefrominpatientrehabilitationafter
a traumatic spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88:745–750. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2007.03.013
48. Bosch A, Stauffer ES, Nickel VL. Incomplete traumatic quadriplegia. A ten-year review. JAMA.
1971;216(3):473–478.doi:10.1001/jama.1971.03180290049006
49. Merriam WF, Taylor TK, Ruff SJ, et al. Areappraisalof acute traumaticcentral cord syndrome. J
BoneJointSurgBr.1986;68(5):708–713.doi:10.1302/0301-620X.68B5.3782229
50. Roth EJ, Lawler MH, Yarkony GM. Traumatic central cord syndromes: clinical features and
functionaloutcomes.ArchPhysMedRehabil.1990;71:18–23.
51. Roth EJ, Park T, Pang T, et al. Traumatic cervical Brown-Séquard and Brown-Séquard plus
syndromes: the spectrum of presentations and outcomes. Paraplegia. 1991;29:582–589. doi:10.1038/sc.1991.86
52. StaufferES.Diagnosisand prognosisofacutecervicalspinalcordinjury.ClinOrthop. 1975;112:9–
15.doi:10.1097/00003086-197510000-00003
53. Anderson PP, Atkinson JL. Spinal shock. Mayo Clin Proc. 1996;71(4): 384–389.
doi:10.4065/71.4.384
54. Ditunno JF, Little JW, Tessler A, et al. Spinal shock revisited: a four-phase model. Spinal Cord.
2004;42:383–395.doi:10.1038/sj.sc.3101603
55. Ko HY, Ditunno JF Jr,GrazianiV,etal.Thepatternofreflexrecoveryduringspinal shock. Spinal
Cord.1999;37:402–409.doi:10.1038/sj.sc.3100840
56. More-O’FerrallD,DohertyJ,DitunnoJF.Uppermotorlesionvslowermotorneuronlesionsinlower
thoraciccompletespinalcordinjury.JSpinalCordMed.1988;21:18–19.
57. Calancie B, Molano MR, BrotonJG.Tendonreflexesfor predicting movement recovery after acute
spinal cord injury in humans. Clin Neurophysiol. 2004;115:2350–2363. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2004.04.028
58. Leis AA, Zhou HH, Mehta M, et al. Behaviour of the H-reflex in humans following mechanical
perturbation or injury to rostral spinal cord. Muscle Nerve. 1996;19(11):1373–1382. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4598(199611)19:11<1373::AID-MUS1>3.0.CO;2-9
59. BeersGJ,RaqueGH,WagnerGG,etal.MRimaginginacutecervicalspinetrauma.JComputAssist
Tomogr.1988;12:755–761.doi:10.1097/00004728-198809010-00007
60. Bondurant FJ, Cotler HB, Kulkarni MV, et al. Acute spinal cord injury. A study using physical
examination and magnetic resonance imaging. Spine. 1990;15:161–168. doi:10.1097/00007632-
199003000-00002
61. Chakeres DW,Flickinger F, Bresnahan JC, et al. MR imaging of acute spinal cord trauma. Am J
Neuroradiol.1987;8(1):5–10.
62. FlandersAE,ScaeferDM,DoanHT,etal.Acutecervicalspinetrauma:correlationofMRimaging
findings with degree of neurologic deficit. Radiology. 1990;177(1):25–33. doi:10.1148/radiology.177.1.2399326
63. GoldbergAL,DaffnerRH,SchapiroRL.Imagingofacutespinaltrauma:anevolvingmulti-modality
approach.ClinImaging.1990;14:11–16.doi:10.1016/0899-7071(90)90111-N
64. Kulkarni MV, McArdle CB, Kopanicky D, et al. Acute spinal cord injury: MR imaging at 1.5 T.
Radiology.1987;164:837–843.doi:10.1148/radiology.164.3.3615885
65. Mirvis SE, Geisler FH, Jelinek JJ, et al. Acute cervical spine trauma: evaluation with 1.5-T MR
imaging.Radiology.1988;166:807–816.doi:10.1148/radiology.166.3.3277249
66. SettP,CrockardHA.Thevalueofmagneticresonanceimaging(MRI)inthefollow-upmanagement
ofspinalinjury.Paraplegia.1991;29:396–410.doi:10.1038/sc.1991.55
67. Tracy PT, Wright RM, Hanigan WC. Magnetic resonance imaging of spinal injury. Spine.
1989;14:292–301.doi:10.1097/00007632-198903000-00009
68. Weirich SD, Cotler HB, Narayana PA, et al. Histopathologic correlation of magnetic resonance
imaging signal patterns in a spinal cord injury model. Spine. 1990;15:630–638. doi:10.1097/00007632-199007000-00004
69. WittenbergRH,BoetelU,BeyerHK.Magneticresonanceimagingandcomputertomographyofacute
spinal cord trauma. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1990;(260):176–185. doi:10.1097/00003086-199011000-
00029
70. Goldberg AL, Rothfus WE, Deeb ZL, et al. The impact of magnetic resonance on the diagnostic
evaluation of acute cervicothoracic spinal trauma. Skeletal Radiol. 1988;17:89–95. doi:10.1007/BF00365133
71. Hackney DB, Finkelstein SD, Hand CM, et al. Postmortem magnetic resonance imaging of
experimental spinal cord injury: magnetic resonance findings versus in vivo functional deficit. Neurosurgery.1994;35:1104–1111.doi:10.1227/00006123-199412000-00013
72. Hackney DB, Ford JC, Markowitz RS, et al. Experimental spinal cord injury: MR correlation to
intensityofinjury.J Comp Assist Tomogr. 1994;18(3):357–362. doi:10.1097/00004728-199405000-
00004
73. Metz GA, Curt A, van de MH, et al. Validation of the weight-drop contusion model in rats: a
comparative study of human spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma. 2000;17(1):1–17. doi:10.1089/neu.2000.17.1
74. Cotler HB, Kulkarni MV,Bondurant FJ.Magnetic resonanceimaging ofacute spinalcord trauma:
preliminaryreport.JOrthopTrauma.1988;2:1–4.doi:10.1097/00005131-198802000-00001
75. Schouman-ClaeysE,FrijaG,CuenodCA,etal.MRimagingofacutespinalcordinjury:resultsofan
experimentalstudyindogs.AmJNeuroradiol.1990;11:959–965.
76. HackneyDB,AsatoR,JosephPM,et al.Hemorrhageandedemainacutespinal cordcompression:
demonstrationbyMRimaging.Radiology.1986;161:387–390.doi:10.1148/radiology.161.2.3763906
77. Sato T, Kokubun S, Rijal KP, et al. Prognosis of cervical spinal cord injury in correlation with
magneticresonanceimaging.Paraplegia.1994;32:81–85.doi:10.1038/sc.1994.14
78. BlackwoodW.Vasculardiseaseofthecentralnervoussystem.In:BlackwoodW,MeyerA,Norman
RM,etal.,eds.Greenfield’sNeuropathology.Baltimore,MD:Williams&Wilkins;1963:71–115.
79. Kalfas I, WilbergerJ,GoldbergA, et al.Magnetic resonance imagingin acute spinal cord trauma.
Neurosurgery.1988;23:295–299.doi:10.1227/00006123-198809000-00002
80. Schaefer DM, FlandersA,Northrup BE, et al.Magnetic resonance imaging ofacutecervical spine
trauma. Correlation with severity of neurologic injury. Spine. 1989;14:1090–1095. doi:10.1097/00007632-198910000-00011
81. Bilgen M, Abbe R, Liu SJ, et al. Spatial and temporal evolution of hemorrhage in the hyperacute
phase of experimental spinal cord injury: in vivo magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2000;43:594–600.doi:10.1002/(SICI)1522-2594(200004)43:4<594::AID-MRM15>3.0.CO;2-1
82. PerovitchM,PerlS,WangH.Currentadvancesinmagneticresonanceimaging(MRI)inspinalcord
trauma:reviewarticle.Paraplegia.1992;30:305–316.doi:10.1038/sc.1992.74
83. FalconerJC,NarayanaPA, BhattacharjeeMB,etal.QuantitativeMRIofspinalcordinjuryina rat
model.MagnResonMed.1994;32:484–491.doi:10.1002/mrm.1910320410
84. Ramon S, DominguezR,Ramirez L, et al.Clinical and magnetic resonanceimagingcorrelation in
acutespinalcordinjury.SpinalCord.1997;35(10):664–673.doi:10.1038/sj.sc.3100490
85. Marciello MA, FlandersAE,Herbison GJ, et al.Magneticresonance imaging related toneurologic
outcomeincervicalspinalcordinjury.ArchPhysMedRehabil.1993.74:940–946.
86. Kulkarni MV, Bondurant FJ, Rose SL, et al. 1.5 tesla magnetic resonance imaging of acute spinal
trauma.Radiographics.1988;8:1059–1082.doi:10.1148/radiographics.8.6.3205929
87. LeypoldBG,FlandersAE,SchwartzED,etal.Theimpactofmethylprednisoloneonlesionseverity
followingspinalcordinjury.Spine.2007;32:373–378.doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000253964.10701.00
88. Leypold BG, Flanders AE, Burns AS. The early evolution of spinal cord lesions on MR imaging
following traumatic spinal cord injury. Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:1012–1016.
https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A0962
89. Aoyama T, Hida K, Akino M, et al. Ultra-early MRI showing no abnormality in a fall victim
presentingwithtetraparesis.SpinalCord.2007;45:695–699.doi:10.1038/sj.sc.3102014
90. SilbersteinM,TressBM,HennessyO.Predictionofneurologicoutcomeinacutespinalcordinjury:
theroleofCTandMR.AmJNeuroradiol1992;13:1597–1608.
91. ZohrabianVM,ParkerL,HarropJS,etal.CananatomiclevelofinjuryonMRIpredictneurological
level in acute cervical spinal cord injury? Br J Neurosurg. 2016;30(2):204–210. doi:10.3109/02688697.2015.1056089
92. TalbottJF,Whetstrone WD, Readdy WJ, et al. The brain and spinal injury center score: a novel,
simple,andreproduciblemethodforassessingtheseverityofacutecervicalspinal cord injury with axial T2-weighted MRI findings. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015;23:495–504. doi:10.3171/2015.1.SPINE141033
93. Miranda P, Gomez P, Alday R, et al. Brown-Sequard syndrome after blunt cervical spine trauma:
clinical and radiological correlations. Eur Spine J. 2007;16:1165–1170. doi:10.1007/s00586-007-
0345-7
94. Quencer RM, Bunge RP.The injured spinal cord: imaging, histopathologic clinical correlates, and
basicscienceapproachestoenhancingneuralfunctionafterspinalcordinjury.Spine.1996;21:2064–
2066.doi:10.1097/00007632-199609150-00002
95. FlandersAE,SpettellCM,TartaglinoLM,etal.Forecastingmotorrecoveryaftercervicalspinalcord
injury:valueofMRimaging.Radiology.1996;201:649–655.doi:10.1148/radiology.201.3.8939210
96. BoldinC,RaithJ,FankhauserF, et al. Predictingneurologicrecoveryincervicalspinalcordinjury
withpostoperativeMRimaging.Spine.2006;31:554–559.doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000201274.59427.a4
97. Schaefer DM, Flanders AE, Osterholm JL, et al. Prognostic significance of magnetic resonance
imaging in the acute phase of cervical spine injury. J Neurosurg. 1992;76:218–223. doi:10.3171/jns.1992.76.2.0218
98. HarringtonJF,LikavecMJ,SmithAS.Discherniationincervicalfracturesubluxation.Neurosurgery.
1991;29:374–379.doi:10.1227/00006123-199109000-00006
99. Fehlings MG, Rao SC, Tator CH, et al. The optimal radiologic method for assessing spinal canal
compromiseandcordcompressionin patients with cervical spinal cord injury. PartII:Resultsofa multicenterstudy.Spine.1999;24:605–613.doi:10.1097/00007632-199903150-00023
100. RaoSC,FehlingsMG.Theoptimalradiologicmethodforassessingspinalcanalcompromiseandcord
compression in patients with cervical spinal cord injury. Part I: an evidence-based analysis of the publishedliterature.Spine.1999;24:598–604.doi:10.1097/00007632-199903150-00022
101. KangJD,FiggieMP,BohlmanHH.Sagittalmeasurementsofthecervicalspineinsubaxialfractures
and dislocations. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994;76:1617–1628. doi:10.2106/00004623-199411000-
00004
102. HayashiK,YoneK,ItoH,etal.MRIfindingsinpatientswithacervicalspinalcordinjurywhodonot
show radiographic evidence of a fracture or dislocation. Paraplegia. 1995;33:212–215. doi:10.1038/sc.1995.47
103. Miyanji F, Furlan JC, Aarabi B, et al. Acute cervical traumatic spinal cord injury: MR imaging
findings correlated with neurologic outcome--prospective study with 100 consecutive patients. Radiology.2007;243:820–827.doi:10.1148/radiol.2433060583
104. Milhorat TH, Johnson RW, Milhorat RH, et al. Clinicopathological correlations in syringomyelia
using axial magnetic resonance imaging. Neurosurgery. 1995;37:206–213. doi:10.1227/00006123-
199508000-00003
105. JinkinsJR,ReddyS,LeiteCC,etal.MRofparenchymalspinalcordsignalchangeasasignofactive
advancementinclinicallyprogressiveposttraumaticsyringomyelia.AmJNeuroradiol.1998;19:177–
182.
106. Quencer RM,SheldonJJ,PostMJ,etal.MRIofthechronicallyinjuredcervicalspinalcord.AmJ
Roentgenol.1986;147:125–132.doi:10.2214/ajr.147.1.125
107. Schurch B, Wichmann W, Rossier AB. Post-traumtic syringomyelia (cystic myelopathy): a
prospectivestudyof449patientswithspinalcordinjury.JNeurolNeurosurgPsych.1996;60(1):61–
67.doi:10.1136/jnnp.60.1.61
108. Schwartz ED, Falcone SF,QuencerRM,etal.Posttraumaticsyringomyelia:pathogenesis,imaging,
andtreatment.AmJRoentgenol.1999;173:487–492.doi:10.2214/ajr.173.2.10430159
109. BodleyR.Imaginginchronicspinalcordinjury--indicationsandbenefits.EurJRadiol2002;42:135–
153.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0720-048X(02)00046-3
110. HesseltineSM,LawM,BabbJ,etal.Diffusiontensorimaginginmultiplesclerosis:assessmentof
regional differences in the axial plane within normal-appearing cervical spinal cord. Am J Neuroradiol.2006;27:1189–1193.
111. Demir A, Ries M, Moonen CT, et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging with apparent diffusion
coefficient and apparent diffusion tensor maps in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Radiology. 2003;229(1):37–43.doi:10.1148/radiol.2291020658
112. Shanmuganathan K, Gullapalli RP, Zhuo J, et al. Diffusion tensor MR imaging in cervical spine
trauma.AmJNeuroradiol.2008;29:655–659.doi:10.3174/ajnr.A0916
113. Cheran,S.,ShanmuganathanK,ZhouJ,etal.CorrelationofMRdiffusiontensorimagingparameters
withASIAmotorscoresinhemorrhagicandnonhemorrhagicacutespinalcordinjury.JNeurotrauma. 2011;28:1881–1892.doi:10.1089/neu.2010.1741
114. Mulcahey MJ, Samdani A, Gaughan J. Diffusion tensor imaging in pediatric spinal cord injury:
preliminary examination of reliability and clinical correlation. Spine. 2012;37:E797–E803. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182470a08
115. Waters RL, Lunsford BR. The energy cost of paraplegic locomotion. J Bone Joint Surg Br.
1985;67A:1245–1250.doi:10.2106/00004623-198567080-00016
116. HusseyRW,StaufferES.SpinalCordInjury:requirementsforambulation.ArchPhys MedRehabil.
1973;54:544–547.
117. Crozier, KS. Cheng LL, Graziani V, et al. Spinal cord injury: prognosis for ambulation based on
quadricepsrecovery.Paraplegia.1992;30:762–767.doi:10.1038/sc.1992.147
118. WatersRL,AdkinsR,YakuraJ,etal.Prediction ofambulatoryperformancebasedonmotorscores
derived from standards of the American Spinal Injury Association. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75:756–760.
119. WilsonJR,GrossmanRG,FrankowskiRF,etal.Aclinicalpredictionmodelforlong-termfunctional
outcome after traumatic spinal cord injury based on acute clinical and imaging factors. J Neurotrauma.2012;29(13):2263–2271.doi:10.1089/neu.2012.2417
120. KaminskiL,CordemansV,CernatE,etal.Functionaloutcomepredictionaftertraumaticspinalcord
injury based on acute clinical factors. J Neurotrauma. 2017;34(12):2027–2033. doi:10.1089/neu.2016.4955
121. van Middendorp JJ, Hosman AJ, Donders AR, et al. A clinical prediction rule for ambulation
outcomes after traumatic spinal cord injury: a longitudinal cohort study. Lancet. 2011;19;377(9770):1004–1010.doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)62276-3
122. BelliveauT,Jette AM, Seetharama S, et al. Developing artificial neural network models to predict
functioningoneyear aftertraumaticspinalcordinjury.ArchPhys MedRehabil.2016;97(10):1663–
1668.doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2016.04.014
123. Hicks KE, Zhao Y, Fallah N, et al. A simplified clinical prediction rule for prognosticating
independentwalkingafterspinalcordinjury:aprospectivestudyfromaCanadianmulticenterspinal cordinjuryregistry.SpineJ.2017;17(10):1383–1392.doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2017.05.031
124. Richard-Denis A, Feldman D, Thompson C, et al. Prediction of functional recovery six months
followingtraumaticspinalcordinjuryduring acute carehospitalization.J Spinal CordMed. 2017; 15:1–9.doi:10.1080/10790268
125. van Silfhout L, Peters AE, Graco M, et al. Validation of the dutch clinical prediction rule for
ambulation outcomes in an inpatient setting following traumatic spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2016;54(8):614–618.doi:10.1038/sc.2015.201