Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_6022_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана
.pdf







REFERENCES
1. DitunnoPL,PatrickM,StinemanM,etal.Whowantstowalk?PreferencesforrecoveryafterSCI:a
longitudinalandcross-sectionalstudy.SpinalCord.2008;46(7):500–506.doi:10.1038/sj.sc.3102172
2. WorldHealthOrganization.International ClassificationofFunctioning,DisabilityandHealth:ICF.
Geneva,Switzerland:Author;2001.
3. Kirshblum SC, Burns SP, Biering-Sorensen F, et al. International standards for neurological
classification of spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2011;34(6): 535–546.
doi:10.1179/204577211X13207446293695
4. Keith RA, Granger CV,Hamilton BB,et al.The functionalindependence measure: a new tool for
rehabilitation.AdvClinRehabil.1987;1:6–18.
5. ItzkovichM,GelernterI,Biering-SorensenF,etal.TheSpinalCordIndependenceMeasure(SCIM)
version III: reliability and validity in a multi-center international study. Disabil Rehabil.
2007;29(24):1926–1933.doi:10.1080/09638280601046302
6. WhiteneckGG,CharlifueSW,GerhartKA,etal.Quantifyinghandicap:anewmeasureoflong-term
rehabilitationoutcomes.ArchPhysMedRehabil.1992;73(6):519–526.
7. MarinoRJ,SheaJA,andStinemanMG.Thecapabilitiesofupperextremityinstrument:reliabilityand
validity of a measure of functional limitation in tetraplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil.
1998;79(12):1512–1521.doi:10.1016/S0003-9993(98)90412-9
8. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): i—conceptual
framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30(6):473–483. doi:10.1097/00005650-199206000-
00002
9. Dijkers M. Quality of life of individuals with spinal cord injury: a review of conceptualization,
measurement, and research findings. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2005;42:87–110.
doi:10.1682/JRRD.2004.08.0100
10. DijkersMP.Issuesintheconceptualizationandmeasurementofparticipation:anoverview.ArchPhys
MedRehabil.2010;91(9Suppl):S5–S16.doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2009.10.036
11. MahoneyFI,,BarthelDW.Functionalevaluation:thebarthelindex.MdStateMedJ.1965;14:61–65.
12. Jette AM, Tulsky DS, Ni P, et al. Development and initial evaluation of the spinal cord injury-
functionalindex.ArchPhysMedRehabil.2012;93(10):1733–1750.doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2012.05.008
13. TulskyDS, Jette AM,Kisala PA,etal.Spinalcord injury-functional index:item banks to measure

physical functioning in individuals with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil.
2012;93(10):1722–1732.doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2012.05.007
14. BondTG,FoxCM.Applyingthe Rasch Model: Fundamental MeasurementintheHumanSciences.
Mahwah,NJ:Erlbaum;2001.
15. Marino RJ. Domains of outcomes in spinal cord injury for clinical trials to improve neurological
function.JRehabilResDev.2007;44(1):113–122.
16. AmstersD,SchuursS,PershouseK,etal.Factorswhichfacilitateorimpedeinterpersonalinteractions
andrelationshipsafterspinalcordinjury:ascopingreviewwithsuggestionsforrehabilitation.Rehabil
ResPract.2016;2016:1–13.doi:10.1155/2016/9373786
17. Rust KL and Smith RO. Assistive technology in the measurement of rehabilitation and health
outcomes: a review and analysis of instruments. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;84(10):780–793.
doi:10.1097/01.phm.0000179520.34844.0e
18. JetteAM,SlavinMD,NiP,etal.DevelopmentandinitialevaluationoftheSCI-FI/AT.JSpinalCord
Med.2015;38(3):409–418.doi:10.1179/2045772315Y.0000000003
19. Slavin MD, Ni P,Tulsky DS, et al. Spinal cord injury-functional index/assistive technology short
forms.ArchPhysMedRehabil.2016;97(10):1745–1752.e7.doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2016.03.029
20. HeinemannAW,DijkersMP,NiP,etal.MeasurementpropertiesoftheSpinalCordInjury-Functional
Index (SCI-FI) short forms. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95(7):1289–1297.e5.
doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2014.01.031
21. Bjorner JB, Chang CH, Thissen D, et al. Developing tailored instruments: item banking and
computerized adaptive assessment. Qual Life Res. 2007;16(Suppl 1):95–108. doi:10.1007/s11136-
007-9168-6
22. GershonRC.Computeradaptivetesting.JApplMeas.2005;6(1):109–127.
23. Dijkers MP, Whiteneck G, El-Jaroudi R. Measures of social outcomes in disability research. Arch
PhysMedRehabil.2000;81(12Suppl2):S63-80.doi:10.1053/apmr.2000.20627
24. StreinerDL,NormanGR.HealthMeasurement Scales.APracticalGuide totheirDevelopmentand
Use.Oxford,UK:OxfordUniversityPress;2003.
25. Mokkink LB, Prinsen CA, Bouter LM, et al. The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of
healthMeasurementINstruments(COSMIN)andhowtoselectanoutcomemeasurementinstrument.
BrazJPhysTher.2016;20(2):105–113.doi:10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0143
26. Johnston MV, Graves DE. Towards guidelines for evaluation of measures: an introduction with
application to spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2008;31(1):13–26.
doi:10.1080/10790268.2008.11753976
27. PostMW.Whattodowith“moderate”reliabilityandvaliditycoefficients?ArchPhysMedRehabil.
2016;97(7):1051–1052.doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2016.04.001
28. TerweeCB,DekkerFW,WiersingaWM,etal.Onassessingresponsivenessofhealth-relatedquality
of life instruments: guidelines for instrument evaluation. Qual Life Res. 2003;12(4):349–362.
doi:10.1023/A:1023499322593
29. FeenyDH,EckstromE,WhitlockEP,etal.AHRQMethodsforEffective HealthCare:APrimerfor
SystematicReviewersontheMeasurementofFunctionalStatusandHealth-RelatedQualityofLifein
OlderAdults.Rockville,MD:AgencyforHealthcareResearchandQuality;2013.
30. MarinoRJ,KernSB,LeibyB,etal.Reliabilityandvalidityofthecapabilitiesofupperextremitytest
(CUE-T) in subjects with chronic spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2015;38(4):498–504.
doi:10.1179/2045772314Y.0000000272
31. Copay AG, Subach BR, Glassman SD, et al. Understanding the minimum clinically important
difference: a review of concepts and methods. Spine J. 2007;7(5):541–546.
doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2007.01.008
32. Wu X, Liu J, Tanadini LG, et al. Challenges for defining minimal clinically important difference
(MCID)afterspinalcordinjury.SpinalCord.2015;53(2):84–91.doi:10.1038/sc.2014.232
33. Lawton G, Lundgren-Nilsson A, Biering-SorensenF, et al. Cross-culturalvalidity of FIMin spinal

cordinjury.SpinalCord.2006;44(12):746–752.doi:10.1038/sj.sc.3101895
34. MeyersAR,AndresenEM.Enablingourinstruments:accommodation,universaldesign,andaccessto
participation in research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81(12 Suppl 2):S5–S9.
doi:10.1053/apmr.2000.20618
35. Marino RJ, Huang M, KnightP, etal. Assessing selfcarestatus in quadriplegia:comparison of the
quadriplegia index of function (QIF) and the functional independence measure (FIM). Paraplegia.
1993;31(4):225–233.doi:10.1038/sc.1993.41
36. Bierman AS. Functional status: the sixth vital sign. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16(11):785–786.
doi:10.1111/j.1525-1497.2001.10918.x
37. Commission on the Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities. CARF International. 2017.
http://www.carf.org
38. CentersforMedicare&MedicaidServices.IRFQualityReportingSpotlight&Announcements.2017
https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/IRF-QualityReporting/Spotlights-Announcements.html
39. CampbellDT,StanleyJC.ExperimentalandQuasi-ExperimentalDesignsforResearch.Chicago,IL:
RandMcNallyandCompany;1963.
40. WhiteneckG,GassawayJ,DijkersMP,etal.Relationshipofpatientcharacteristicsandrehabilitation
services to outcomes following spinal cord injury: the SCIRehab project. J Spinal Cord Med.
2012;35(6):484–502.doi:10.1179/2045772312Y.0000000057
41. UniformDataSystemforMedicalRehabilitation.UniformDataSystemforMedical Rehabilitation.
2017http://www.udsmr.org/Default.aspx
42. American Medical Rehabilitation Providers Association. Welcome to eRehabData.com. 2017.
https://web2.erehabdata.com/erehabdata/index.jsp
43. Granger CV,Deutsch A, Russell C, et al. Modificationsof the FIM instrument underthe inpatient
rehabilitation facility prospective payment system. Am J Phys Med. 2007;86(11):883–892.
doi:10.1097/PHM.0b013e318152058a
44. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. CARE Item Set and B-CARE. 2015.
https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/Post-Acute-CareQuality-Initiatives/CARE-Item-Set-and-B-CARE.html
45. Dijkers M. Quality of life after spinal cord injury: a meta analysis of the effects of disablement
components.SpinalCord.1997;35(12):829–840.doi:10.1038/sj.sc.3100571
46. Donnelly C and Carswell A. Individualized outcome measures: a review of the literature. Can J
OccupTher.2002;69(2):84–94.doi:10.1177/000841740206900204
47. OttenbacherKJandCusickA.Goalattainmentscalingasamethodofclinicalserviceevaluation.Am
JOccupTher.1990;44(6):519–525.doi:10.5014/ajot.44.6.519
48. DijkersMP.Individualizationinqualityoflifemeasurement:instrumentsandapproaches.ArchPhys
MedRehabil.2003;84(4Suppl2):S3–S14.doi:10.1053/apmr.2003.50241
49. OnlineSurveysbyZoomerang.Boomerang.com.2017.www.zoomerang.com
50. Butcher JN, Perry J, Hahn J. Computers in clinical assessment: historical developments, present
status,andfuturechallenges.JClinPsychol.2004;60(3):331–345.doi:10.1002/jclp.10267
51. TulskyDS,KisalaPA,VictorsonD,etal.OverviewoftheSpinalCordInjury--QualityofLife(SCI-
QOL) measurement system. J Spinal Cord Med. 2015;38(3):257–269.
doi:10.1179/2045772315Y.0000000023
52. Stone AA, Shiffman S. Capturing momentary,self-report data: a proposal for reporting guidelines.
AnnBehavMed.2002;24(3):236–243.doi:10.1207/S15324796ABM2403_09
53. SeekinsT,IpsenC,ArnoldNL.Usingecologicalmomentaryassessmenttomeasureparticipation:A
preliminarystudy.RehabilPsychol.2007;52(3):319–330.doi:10.1037/0090-5550.52.3.319
54. RullierL,AtzeniT,HuskyM,etal.Dailylifefunctioningofcommunity-dwellingelderlycouples:an
investigation of the feasibility and validity of ecological momentary assessment. Int J Methods
PsychiatrRes.2014;23(2):208–216.doi:10.1002/mpr.1425
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
